Tag: Fani-Kayode

  • Osiyemi slams Fani-Kayode

    Osiyemi slams Fani-Kayode

    A former chairman of Mushin local government in Lagos State, Prince Bayo Osiyemi, has carpeted the Director of Media and Publicity to former President Goodluck Jonathan’s campaign, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, for advocating Cromwell’s treatment for political leaders.

    Declaring the call as “an indirect insurrection against a validly elected democratic government”, Osiyemi said Fani-Kayode’s description amounts to “treason, pure and simple.”

    Osiyemi, in a statement yesterday, wondered why the former Aviation Minister did not make similar calls under the Jonathan administration.

    According to him: “One could have ignored his call…, but those who are too young to know where he was coming from might be misled into thinking that he had any patriotic fervor in his veins.”

    He urged Nigerians to ignore Fani-Kayode’s ranting, stating that security agencies should not “dignify a paper tiger of no known political worth the attention he doesn’t deserve.”

  • ‘Born-Again’ Fani-Kayode

    The history of his life is replete with many scars of ‘war’. Like or hate him, Femi Fani-Kayode, lawyer, politician is a good writer and wonderful debater. He is neither shy from stoking the fire of controversy nor afraid to do battle with real or imagined enemies. He is also resplendent in good fashion attires. Whenever he appears in public either in his well-tailored suit, blazer or custom-made native ensemble –Kaftan or Agbada– with his designer sun shades to match, he always stands out.

    Femi has been in the news for all his adult life. In the last seven years, he has been in and out of courts battling to save himself from those who were bent on railroading him to Siberia. But last week Wednesday, July 1, the outspoken and controversial dude had cause to smile. On that day, the two surviving counts of a 40-count charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, in 2008, were decided in his favour. Consequently, the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos discharged and acquitted the former Minister of Aviation and one-time Minister of Culture and Tourism of the charges of money laundering brought against him.

    Delivering her judgment, Justice Rita Ofili Ajumogobia, noted that the case of the prosecution was “feeble” and without cogent evidence on which a finding of guilt could be based. It is also important to mention that the original charge brought against Fani-Kayode in 2008 before Justice Ramat Mohammed carried 40 counts of misappropriation of public funds and money laundering of several amounts totalling about 100 million naira or more. When Justice Ajumogobia took charge of the case, the court dropped 38 of the charges in November 2014 as the facts and evidence were not enough to sustain a charge. The last two counts of laundering the sum of 2.1 million naira are those for which Fani-Kayode has now been absolved.

    The EFCC team, led by Festus Keyamo failed to prove all the elements of the alleged crime arising from the Money Laundering Act. The court identified that the allegation was concerned with conducting transactions exceeding N500, 000 in cash without going through a financial institution, which is prohibited under the Money Laundering Act. To establish its case, the EFCC called Police Superintendent Agbaje (amongst other witnesses) who was a former aide of Fani-Kayode during his time as the Minister of Culture and Tourism. The witness testified that he received sums exceeding that allowed amount from Fani-Kayode with instructions to deposit the same in the latter’s account. Evidence of deposits made into Fani-Kayode’s accounts was also tendered.

    The court however found that the prosecution’s case could not be sustained as, first, the oral evidence of the witness in court contradictéd his earlier written statement and in such cases, the court finds such witnesses to be unreliable. Furthermore, there was nothing in the prosecution’s case showing the source of the money, nor proof that amounts exceeding N500, 000 was received by Fani-Kayode in cash. There remained a doubt as to whether the sums in Fani-Kayode’s accounts were not received in tranches and the court decided on the side of the defendant.

    In its judgment, the court highlighted that the source and motive of receiving the money is irrelevant since the issue was about cash transactions exceeding N500, 000 without going through a financial institution. This seemed to aid Fani-Kayode’s case as the testimony by one of his witnesses that the alleged sums were received from tenants occupying some of the former minister’s properties was also considered doubtful by the judge.

    As always, Nigerians may decry the judgment as another failure by the anti-corruption agency to put together a credible case. Some may even cry judicial foul play in acquitting the former minister. However, it should be pointed out that the court acknowledged Keyamo’s dexterity in prosecuting the case and differentiated him from other less diligent prosecutors. It appears only that the powers that be at the time, gave a mandate for the prosecution of the former minister even without enough substance to sustain a conviction. The yearnings by the public to see corrupt officials tried and convicted may also lead to hurried charges lacking depth.

    Now, a casual observer may well see some merit in Fani-Kayode’s insistent claims throughout the case that the charges were politically motivated. Given the way the case has finally turned out and the sequence of events in the case, a view that the charges were hurriedly drafted to satisfy some political exigency during the late President Umaru Yar’ Adua’s administration cannot be faulted. The verdict is now in and ‘the innocent man’ has been acquitted.

    At last, Femi has enjoyed a victory after suffering huge criticism in the run up to the last Presidential election in which he was at the head of the media campaign team put in place for former President Goodluck Jonathan’s re-election. Jonathan lost woefully in that election. Femi’s campaign appointment at that time, which came after his brief romance with the then-opposition party, the All Progressives’ Congress, APC, drew a lot of flak from people. He was described as a two-faced, inconsistent player in the political arena with wavering ideologies. His often unreserved comments in the media have led to much criticism.

    Perhaps, basking in the euphoria of his latest victory, Femi has announced his desire to change his last name from Fani-Kayode to Olukayode as a tribute to God for delivering him from his legal entanglement. Coming from a man whose ideology and political stance has changed severally over the years like a chameleonic metamorphosis, this may be a tad comical. Beyond that, however, it is hoped that the change will resonate throughout his person too and his knack for insensitive remarks in the press will be lessened at the same time. His brazen comments about other political figures who are not in his chosen camp and unsavoury remarks on other issues including the much publicised condemnation of the Igbos, have put a label of a loose cannon on the otherwise well educated man.

    The man may have an unbridled tongue and a penchant for attracting controversy, but the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has determined that at least, in respect to the charges brought against him, he is innocent. Whether the EFCC goes on appeal or not, which is doubtful, this is the reality for now. Often in the business world, it is common for a company to change its brand name to distance itself from some negative publicity or project a new, better image for itself. It is the hope that if the former Minister does make good on his name change, then, we will see more of the reasoned educated man, cultured in speech and expression and less of the political chameleon and controversy magnet that Fani-Kayode has come to be known to be.

    An important lesson here should not be lost. In spite of all the dirty hate propaganda Femi mounted against President Muhammadu Buhari’s candidacy during the last electioneering campaigns, he still got a good deal from the court last week. It was the Russian Writer, Count Leo (Nikolayevich) Tolstoy (1828-1910) who, in What I Believe (1884) wrote: “There is only one way to put an end to evil, and that is to do good for evil.” This self-acclaimed poet and historian must now revisit his own history and see where he needs to do better. Poets are known to be great self-critics and “Mr Olukayode” must now find the discipline to do just that going forward.

    This self-acclaimed poet and historian must now revisit his own history and see where he needs to do better. Poets are known to be great self-critics and “Mr Olukayode” must now find the discipline to do just that going forward

     

  • ‘Born-Again’ Fani-Kayode

    The history of his life is replete with many scars of ‘war’. Like or hate him, Femi Fani-Kayode, lawyer, politician is a good writer and wonderful debater. He is neither shy from stoking the fire of controversy nor afraid to do battle with real or imagined enemies. He is also resplendent in good fashion attires. Whenever he appears in public either in his well-tailored suit, blazer or custom-made native ensemble –Kaftan or Agbada– with his designer sun shades to match, he always stands out.

    Femi has been in the news for all his adult life. In the last seven years, he has been in and out of courts battling to save himself from those who were bent on railroading him to Siberia. But last week Wednesday, July 1, the outspoken and controversial dude had cause to smile. On that day, the two surviving counts of a 40-count charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, in 2008, were decided in his favour. Consequently, the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos discharged and acquitted the former Minister of Aviation and one-time Minister of Culture and Tourism of the charges of money laundering brought against him.

    Delivering her judgment, Justice Rita Ofili Ajumogobia, noted that the case of the prosecution was “feeble” and without cogent evidence on which a finding of guilt could be based. It is also important to mention that the original charge brought against Fani-Kayode in 2008 before Justice Ramat Mohammed carried 40 counts of misappropriation of public funds and money laundering of several amounts totalling about 100 million naira or more. When Justice Ajumogobia took charge of the case, the court dropped 38 of the charges in November 2014 as the facts and evidence were not enough to sustain a charge. The last two counts of laundering the sum of 2.1 million naira are those for which Fani-Kayode has now been absolved.

    The EFCC team, led by Festus Keyamo failed to prove all the elements of the alleged crime arising from the Money Laundering Act. The court identified that the allegation was concerned with conducting transactions exceeding N500, 000 in cash without going through a financial institution, which is prohibited under the Money Laundering Act. To establish its case, the EFCC called Police Superintendent Agbaje (amongst other witnesses) who was a former aide of Fani-Kayode during his time as the Minister of Culture and Tourism. The witness testified that he received sums exceeding that allowed amount from Fani-Kayode with instructions to deposit the same in the latter’s account. Evidence of deposits made into Fani-Kayode’s accounts was also tendered.

    The court however found that the prosecution’s case could not be sustained as, first, the oral evidence of the witness in court contradictéd his earlier written statement and in such cases, the court finds such witnesses to be unreliable. Furthermore, there was nothing in the prosecution’s case showing the source of the money, nor proof that amounts exceeding N500, 000 was received by Fani-Kayode in cash. There remained a doubt as to whether the sums in Fani-Kayode’s accounts were not received in tranches and the court decided on the side of the defendant.

    In its judgment, the court highlighted that the source and motive of receiving the money is irrelevant since the issue was about cash transactions exceeding N500, 000 without going through a financial institution. This seemed to aid Fani-Kayode’s case as the testimony by one of his witnesses that the alleged sums were received from tenants occupying some of the former minister’s properties was also considered doubtful by the judge.

    As always, Nigerians may decry the judgment as another failure by the anti-corruption agency to put together a credible case. Some may even cry judicial foul play in acquitting the former minister. However, it should be pointed out that the court acknowledged Keyamo’s dexterity in prosecuting the case and differentiated him from other less diligent prosecutors. It appears only that the powers that be at the time, gave a mandate for the prosecution of the former minister even without enough substance to sustain a conviction. The yearnings by the public to see corrupt officials tried and convicted may also lead to hurried charges lacking depth.

    Now, a casual observer may well see some merit in Fani-Kayode’s insistent claims throughout the case that the charges were politically motivated. Given the way the case has finally turned out and the sequence of events in the case, a view that the charges were hurriedly drafted to satisfy some political exigency during the late President Umaru Yar’ Adua’s administration cannot be faulted. The verdict is now in and ‘the innocent man’ has been acquitted.

    At last, Femi has enjoyed a victory after suffering huge criticism in the run up to the last Presidential election in which he was at the head of the media campaign team put in place for former President Goodluck Jonathan’s re-election. Jonathan lost woefully in that election. Femi’s campaign appointment at that time, which came after his brief romance with the then-opposition party, the All Progressives’ Congress, APC, drew a lot of flak from people. He was described as a two-faced, inconsistent player in the political arena with wavering ideologies. His often unreserved comments in the media have led to much criticism.

    Perhaps, basking in the euphoria of his latest victory, Femi has announced his desire to change his last name from Fani-Kayode to Olukayode as a tribute to God for delivering him from his legal entanglement. Coming from a man whose ideology and political stance has changed severally over the years like a chameleonic metamorphosis, this may be a tad comical. Beyond that, however, it is hoped that the change will resonate throughout his person too and his knack for insensitive remarks in the press will be lessened at the same time. His brazen comments about other political figures who are not in his chosen camp and unsavoury remarks on other issues including the much publicised condemnation of the Igbos, have put a label of a loose cannon on the otherwise well educated man.

    The man may have an unbridled tongue and a penchant for attracting controversy, but the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has determined that at least, in respect to the charges brought against him, he is innocent. Whether the EFCC goes on appeal or not, which is doubtful, this is the reality for now. Often in the business world, it is common for a company to change its brand name to distance itself from some negative publicity or project a new, better image for itself. It is the hope that if the former Minister does make good on his name change, then, we will see more of the reasoned educated man, cultured in speech and expression and less of the political chameleon and controversy magnet that Fani-Kayode has come to be known to be.

    An important lesson here should not be lost. In spite of all the dirty hate propaganda Femi mounted against President Muhammadu Buhari’s candidacy during the last electioneering campaigns, he still got a good deal from the court last week. It was the Russian Writer, Count Leo (Nikolayevich) Tolstoy (1828-1910) who, in What I Believe (1884) wrote: “There is only one way to put an end to evil, and that is to do good for evil.” This self-acclaimed poet and historian must now revisit his own history and see where he needs to do better. Poets are known to be great self-critics and “Mr Olukayode” must now find the discipline to do just that going forward.

    This self-acclaimed poet and historian must now revisit his own history and see where he needs to do better. Poets are known to be great self-critics and “Mr Olukayode” must now find the discipline to do just that going forward

     

  • Court acquits Fani-Kayode of money laundering charge

    Court acquits Fani-Kayode of money laundering charge

    A Federal High Court in Lagos yesterday discharged and acquitted a former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, of the money laundering charges filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia held that the prosecution did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that  Fani-Kayode was guilty as charged.

    She described EFCC’s case as “feeble”, adding that the testimony of the fourth prosecution witness (PW4), Supo Agbaje, who testified that Fani-Kayode gave him cash to pay into his account, was not reliable.

    According to her, PW4’s testimony was contradictory, even as the prosecution did not show proof that Fani-Kayode received the money in cash.

    “Any doubt must be resolved in favour of the accused person,” the judge said.

    She added: “The solitary issue for determination is whether the prosecution has been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt the elements of the offence committed.

    “The giver of the money to PW4 remains unclear. The oral testimony of PW4 before this court is at variance with his earlier voluntary submission before the EFCC.

    “I find unreliable the testimony of PW4 that it was the accused person that gave him the sums of money to pay into his account.

    “His testimony before this court seems to be an afterthought by the fact that PW4 who was stated by the prosecution to be at large initially suddenly resurfaced to give testimony on behalf of the prosecution.

    “The law is trite that where there are two or more conflicting testimonies by a witness, such testimonies must be discarded by the court,” the judge said.

    One of Fani-Kayode’s witnesses had claimed that the amount were proceeds of rent paid by those living in the former minister’s estate.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia said even though the claim was also doubtful, the source and motive of receiving the money was irrelevant since the issue was about cash transactions exceeding N500,000 without going through a financial institution.

    “I do not agree with the prosecution that evidence of deposits in the bank account of the accused person without more is sufficient evidence to show that the latter received cash payments from unknown sources of sums above the statutory threshold of N500,000.

    “The fallacy in such argument lies in the fact that it would remain unclear as to whether the accused person received the alleged sums in tranches,” she said.

    She said it was necessary for sufficient and unequivocal evidence to be put before the court as to how and in what manner the monies were actually received, which she said EFCC failed to do.

    “By the fact that the giver and source of the money are hazy and unproven, it remains the law that where there are doubts or insufficient evidence linking the accused person with the elements and ingredients of the offence, a court must discharge him as a matter of law,” she held.

    In all, she found that the allegations against Fani-Kayode were not successfully proven, as the source of the money was unclear.

    “It is apparent that the prosecution’s case is feeble and has failed to establish that the accused person made or accepted cash deposits exceeding the authorised limits and did not do so through a financial institution.

    “The prosecution has, therefore, failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that an offence has been committed under Section 15 (1) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act 2004.

    “I am of the considered view that the accused person, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, in the absence of copious evidence before the court, ought to be discharged and acquitted of the two surviving counts of the amended charge and I so hold,” the judge held.

    She praised prosecution counsel Festus Keyamo for his activism and dexterity in swiftly prosecuting the case, saying if other prosecutors were like him, several pending criminal cases would have been decided.

    Fani-Kayode, who was Director of Media and Publicity of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Campaign in this year’s general election, was accused of making a transaction exceeding N500,000 on September 20, 2006, which was not done through a financial institution.

    He was said to have accepted N2.1 million in cash, which was paid into his personal bank account by his aide, Supo Agbaje, while he served as Minister of Culture and Tourism.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia had, last November 17, directed Fani-Kayode to defend two of 40-count money laundering charges.

    The judge held that the commission did not prove the other counts sufficiently and partially upheld Fani-Kayode’s no-case submission.

    She discharged and acquitted him of the rest of the 38 counts on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove “elements” of the allegations.

    Fani-Kayode, therefore, defended counts 25 and 26.

    Fani-Kayode, in the course of his public service, was also accused of stealing N19.5 billion aviation intervention fund and another N6.5 billion. He was later accused of laundering N200 million.

    Keyamo indicated that EFCC might appeal the judgment, saying: “We’ll sit down at the corporate level and take a decision.”

    After the verdict, Fani-Kayode, in a statement, said: “I am delighted, humbled and relieved by this verdict. In the last seven years, I have been subjected to the most malicious, vicious, sinister, well-orchestrated, insidious and devastating form of political persecution and wickedness.

    “The whole process almost destroyed my life, my family, my reputation, my health and my career. I thank God for his goodness, His mercy and for the fact that today, the whole nightmare has finally come to an end.”

    He said he would no longer be known as David Oluwafemi Fani-Kayode, “but instead, it shall be David Oluwafemi Olukayode. Olukayode means ‘the Lord has brought me joy’ and today he has done precisely that”.

    “From this day, in honour of Him and as a small tribute to my love for and total dependence on Him, that shall remain my family name.”

    He added that following the verdict, he would be travelling out for the first time in seven years for “a short holiday and a long overdue medical examination”.

  • EFCC to respond to Fani-Kayode acquittal

    EFCC to respond to Fani-Kayode acquittal

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) said on Wednesday that it would respond to the acquittal of Mr Femi Fani-Kayode, a former Minister of Aviation, after a review of the judgement.

    Mr Wilson Uwujaren, Spokesman of EFCC, in a statement in Abuja, said the commission was making effort to obtain a certified true copy of the judgment.

    “The EFCC today (Wednesday) received with shock, the ruling of Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia of the Federal High Court, Lagos, acquitting Fani-kayode.

    “The commission is making effort to obtain a certified true copy of the ruling, to enable it to respond appropriately after careful review of the judgment,” he said.

    Ofili-Ajumogobia, in the judgement in Lagos on Wednesday, acquitted the former minister of a two-count charge of money laundering preferred against him by the EFCC.

    She said the acquittal followed the failure of the prosecution to provide enough evidence linking Fani-Kayode to money laundering.

    Fani-Kayode was arraigned by the EFCC for laundering about N100 million during his tenure as Minister of Culture and Tourism and subsequently, Minister of Aviation.

  • Fani-Kayode cleared of corruption charges

    The Federal High Court in Lagos on Wednesday discharged and acquitted a former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, of the money laundering charges filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia held that the prosecution did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was guilty as charged.

    She described EFCC’s case as “feeble,” adding that the testimony of the fourth prosecution witness (PW4) Supo Agbaje, who testified that Fani-Kayode gave him cash to pay into his account was not reliable.

    According to her, the PW4’s testimony was contradictory, even as the prosecution did not show proof that Fani-Kayode received the money in cash.

    “Any doubt must be resolved in favour of the accused person,” the judge said.

    She added: “The solitary issue for determination is whether the prosecution has been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt the elements of the offence committed.

    “The giver of the money to PW4 remains unclear. The oral testimony of PW4 before this court is at variance with his earlier voluntary submission before the EFCC.

    “I find unreliable the testimony of PW4 that it was the accused person that gave him the sums of money to pay into his account.

    “His testimony before this court seems to be an afterthought by the fact that PW4 who was stated by the prosecution to be at large initially suddenly resurfaced to give testimony on behalf of the prosecution.

    “The law is trite that where there are two or more conflicting testimonies by a witness, such testimonies must be discarded by the court,” the judge said.

    One of Fani-Kayode’s witnesses had claimed that the monies were proceeds of rent paid by those living in the former minister’s estate.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia said although the claim was also doubtful, the source and motive of receiving the money is irrelevant since the issue was about cash transactions exceeding N500,000 without going through a financial institution.

    “I do not agree with the prosecution that evidence of deposits in the bank account of the accused person without more is sufficient evidence to show that the latter received cash payments from unknown sources of sums above the statutory threshold of N500,000.

    “The fallacy in such argument lies in the fact that it would remain unclear as to whether the accused person received the alleged sums in tranches,” she said.

     

  • Fani-Kayode cleared of corruption charges

    The Federal High Court in Lagos on Wednesday discharged and acquitted a former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, of the money laundering charges filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia held that the prosecution did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was guilty as charged.

    She described EFCC’s case as “feeble,” adding that the testimony of the fourth prosecution witness (PW4) Supo Agbaje, who testified that Fani-Kayode gave him cash to pay into his account was not reliable.

    According to her, the PW4’s testimony was contradictory, even as the prosecution did not show proof that Fani-Kayode received the money in cash.

    “Any doubt must be resolved in favour of the accused person,” the judge said.

    She added: “The solitary issue for determination is whether the prosecution has been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt the elements of the offence committed.

    “The giver of the money to PW4 remains unclear. The oral testimony of PW4 before this court is at variance with his earlier voluntary submission before the EFCC.

    “I find unreliable the testimony of PW4 that it was the accused person that gave him the sums of money to pay into his account.

    “His testimony before this court seems to be an afterthought by the fact that PW4 who was stated by the prosecution to be at large initially suddenly resurfaced to give testimony on behalf of the prosecution.

    “The law is trite that where there are two or more conflicting testimonies by a witness, such testimonies must be discarded by the court,” the judge said.

    One of Fani-Kayode’s witnesses had claimed that the monies were proceeds of rent paid by those living in the former minister’s estate.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia said although the claim was also doubtful, the source and motive of receiving the money is irrelevant since the issue was about cash transactions exceeding N500,000 without going through a financial institution.

    “I do not agree with the prosecution that evidence of deposits in the bank account of the accused person without more is sufficient evidence to show that the latter received cash payments from unknown sources of sums above the statutory threshold of N500,000.

    “The fallacy in such argument lies in the fact that it would remain unclear as to whether the accused person received the alleged sums in tranches,” she said.

     

  • Money-laundering: Fani-Kayode knows fate today

    Judgment will be delivered today in the trial of a former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode.

    The former Director of Media and Publicity of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Campaign is accused of money laundering.

    Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia decided not to deliver the verdict on June 18 because the prosecution counsel, Mr. Festus Keyamo, was absent.

    Fani-Kayode, while serving as minister of Culture and Tourism, was accused of making a transaction exceeding N500,000 on September 20, 2006, which was not done through a financial institution.

    He was accused of accepting N2.1 million in cash, which was paid into his personal bank account by his aide, Supo Agbaje.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to the alleged offence, which the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) said contravened the Money Laundering Act.

    The judge had, last November 17, directed Fani-Kayode to defend two of the 40-count charges.

    The judge held that the commission did not prove the other counts sufficiently and partially upheld Fani-Kayode’s no-case submission.

    She discharged and acquitted him of the rest of the 38 counts on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove “elements” of the allegations.

    Fani-Kayode, therefore, defended counts 25 and 26.

     

  • Money-laundering: Fani-Kayode knows fate Wednesday

    Judgment will be delivered on Wednesday in the trial of a former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode.

    The former Director of Media and Publicity of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Campaign was accused of money laundering.

    Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia chose not to deliver the verdict on the earlier date, June 18, because the prosecution counsel, Mr. Festus Keyamo, was absent.

    Fani-Kayode was accused of making a transaction exceeding N500,000 on September 20, 2006, which was not done through a financial institution.

    Fani-Kayode, according to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, collected N2.1 million cash paid into his personal bank account by his aide, Supo Agbaje, while he served as Minister of Culture and Tourism.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to the alleged offence which the EFCC aid contravenes the Money Laundering Act.

    The judge had, last November 17, directed Fani-Kayode, to defend two of 40-count money laundering charges.

    The judge held that the commission did not prove the other charges sufficiently and partially upheld Fani-Kayode’s no-case submission.

     

  • Money laundering: Judgment  in suit against Fani-Kayode July 1

    Money laundering: Judgment in suit against Fani-Kayode July 1

    Judgment in the trial of a former Minister of Aviation Chief Femi Fani-Kayode for alleged money laundering was stalled yesterday due to the absence of prosecuting counsel Mr. Festus Keyamo.

    Chief Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN) urged the judge to go on and deliver the judgment since it was ready.

    He said the law did not make it mandatory that a prosecuting counsel must be present before a judgment is delivered in a criminal trial.

    The senior advocate said even if someone is holding a watching brief for the prosecuting counsel, the judgment could still be delivered.

    But Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia insisted that she was more comfortable reading the judgment in Keyamo’s presence.

    She stood the case down for 10 minutes to enable the lawyer from Keyamo’s chambers, Mr. Festus Afeiyodion, to confirm from his principal the day he would be available.

    About an hour later, Afeiyodion told the judge that Keyamo requested for a short stand-down to enable him come, as he was handling another matter elsewhere.

    “Mr. Keyamo asked that the matter be stood down till 1.30pm. By then, he would be through and be here personally. In the alternative, he suggested that any other day could be chosen and he will be here,” Afeiyodion said.

    Adedipe, after briefly conferring with Fani-Kayode, said they would not mind waiting till 1.30pm.

    However, the judge said she would prefer not to deliver the judgment under pressure as the day would have been far gone by that time.

    Apparently to prove that the judgment was indeed ready, she displayed a typewritten material on her tablet, saying she prefers to read it out at a convenient time.

    Fani-Kayode was accused of making a transaction exceeding N500,000 on September 20, 2006, which was not done through a financial institution.

    He was alleged to have accepted N2.1 million in cash, which was paid into his personal bank account by his aide, Supo Agbaje, while he served as Minister of Culture and Tourism.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to the alleged offence, which the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) said contravenes the Money Laundering Act.

    The judge, last November 17, directed Fani-Kayode to defend two of 40-count money laundering charges initially brought against him.

    Holding that the commission did not prove the other counts sufficiently, she partially upheld Fani-Kayode’s no-case submission.

    She discharged and acquitted him of the 38 counts on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove “elements” of the allegations.

    The judgment has been adjourned till July 1.