Tag: Fani-Kayode

  • Fani-Kayode’s witness lied to court, says EFCC

    Fani-Kayode’s witness lied to court, says EFCC

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday accused the second defence witness (DW2) in the trial of Director of Media and Publicity of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Campaign Organisation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, of lying to the court.

    The witness, Aderemi Ajidaun, who said he was Fani-Kayode’s childhood friend and former chief of staff when the defendant was the Minister of Culture and Tourism, testified at the former minister’s trial before Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia of the Federal High Court in Lagos.

    EFCC’s lawyer Mr Festus Keyamo, while cross-examining the witness, accused him of being in court to “help” his friend and was not telling the truth.

    Fani-Kayode was accused of making a transaction exceeding N500,000 on September 20, 2006, which was not done through a financial institution, by accepting N2.1 million in cash, which was paid into his personal bank account by his aide, Supo Agbaje, while he served as Minister of Culture and Tourism.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to the alleged offence which EFCC said contravenes the Money Laundering Act.

    The first defence witness, Kola Olapoju, had testified on Monday that he was the administrator of the late Fani Kayode’s estate, and that the defendant directed him to withdraw money from the estate’s accounts, which he intended to use for the renovation of his personal house.

    Testifying yesterday, Ajidaun said he was in his office when Olapoju brought the cash on September 21, 2006 and asked to see Fani-Kayode, who was away.

    “I asked him to go and deposit it in the bank since the accused did not handle cash. When he (Olapoju) said he was in a rush to return to Lagos, I called Agbaje and asked him to follow Olapujo to the bank. Again on September 29, I received a call from Mr Olapoju. He said he had certain monies for the accused who was not in the office, neither was I. I also asked him to contact Agbaje to assist him,” the witness said.

    According to him, Agbaje, who was one of Fani-Kayode’s personal assistants, did not have direct access to the former minister.

    But this contradicted earlier evidence by Agbaje that it was Fani-Kayode who personally gave him the cash to pay into his account.

    “Agbaje never had direct access to Fani-Kayode and could not have collected cash from him. Every staff had to pass through me to reach the honourable minister,” Ajidaun said.

    At this point, Keyamo asked the witness: “Will it surprise you that Mr Agbaje came to this court and never mentioned you?” Ajidaun replied: “I’ll be very surprised.”

    Keyamo said: “Agbaje said the accused person (Fani-Kayode) gave him the money. It means that between the two of you, someone is telling this court a lie.” The witness said: “My account is the truth.”

    The prosecutor asked Ajidaun: “Do you want to re-iterate that a Personal Assistant never had access to the accused person?” The witness replied: “There were 12 personal assistants. They might be PAs to the minister, but they were responsible to me primarily.”

    Keyamo then accused him of lying, saying: “I suggest to you that you have come to this court to help a friend of 50 years standing and you are not telling the court the truth.”

    The witness denied the allegation, saying: “I’ve never told lies regarding this case even though certain people had asked me to lie. I have not done so on this occasion.”

    Ajidaun said even though it was not the normal practice for people to bring cash to Fani-Kayode’s office, he did not find the monies brought by Olapoju unusual.

    He also said he did not remember whether other aides made lodgments to Fani-Kayode’s account.

    Earlier, Olapoju, who said he had been the estate’s co-administrator for 14 years, claimed it was not the first time Fani-Kayode would ask him to withdraw money from the estate’s account for him.

    He said in the case of the transactions for which Fani-Kayode was charged, the former minister asked him to give him the money for his renovation project, adding that when he brought the money, the chief of staff directed him to deal with Agbaje, even though he did not get back to Fani-Kayode that the money had been paid.

    Keyamo asked the witness if he was aware that Fani-Kayode’s account had a balance of N8.5million, far more than the N2.1million purportedly meant to pay the artisans renovating the house.

    Olapujo said: “I now know that the balance was more than the cash I brought.”

    The witness said he did not see Agbaje pay in the money, as he left him at the bank and went to the airport, and that he did not know whether Fani-Kayode spoke to Agbaje on phone after he had left.

    Fani-Kayode’s lawyer, Mr Wale Akoni (SAN), said the former minister would call one more defence witness.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia adjourned till March 26 for continuation of trial.

  • Money laundering: Keyamo’s absence stalls Fani-Kayode’s trial

    The trial of the Director of Media and Publicity of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Presidential Campaign Organisation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, was stalled on Monday at the Federal High Court in Lagos.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arraigned the former minister of Aviation over an alleged money laundering.

    The trial, however, could not go on because the prosecution’ counsel, Mr. Festus Keyamo, was absent in court.

    Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia had adjourned for the former minister to open his defence.

    Fani-Kayode, accompanied by some aides, was in court and duly went into the dock when the case was called.

    However, Mr. Somadina Okore, who represented EFCC, drew the court’s attention to a letter by Keyamo, saying he would not be available.

    He said Keyamo had another case at the Federal High Court in Yola, and that he had asked that a new date be fixed so that he could prosecute the matter himself.

    Fani-Kayode’s lawyer, Mr. Wale Akoni (SAN), said he was aware of the letter and that he had no objection to the request for an adjournment.

    He also reminded the court that the matter was adjourned till Tuesday, adding that if it was convenient for the court, his client would return to stand trial.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia had discharged and acquitted Fani-Kayode of 38 out of 40 counts of alleged money laundering.

    The judge, while ruling on the defendant’s no-case submission on November 17, last year, held that the commission did not prove the other charges sufficiently.

    She partially upheld Fani-Kayode’s no-case submission and directed him to open defence in two charges (25 and 26).

    She discharged and acquitted him on the 38 other charges on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove “elements” of the allegations.

     

  • We are not for interim government, poll shift – PDP

    We are not for interim government, poll shift – PDP

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has denied alleged plots to install an interim government in the country if President Goodluck Jonathan loses the presidential election. The party also denied rooting for a shift in the February poll.

    The opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) has accused the ruling party of instigating a shift in dates of election and plotting to scuttle the poll, with the view to installing an interim government in the country.

    But Director of Media and Publicity of the PDP presidential campaign organisation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, denied the allegations, describing them as disingenuous, tenuous and shameful.

    “This is because it is common knowledge that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria does not provide for the Interim Nation Government contraption that the APC talks about,” Fani-Kayode stated at a press briefing in Abuja on Wednesday.

    The PDP faulted the spokesman of the APC, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, accusing him of building up seemingly scary scenarios to create tension, cause panic in the polity and incite supporters of his party and well-meaning Nigerians against the Federal Government, President Goodluck Jonathan and the PDP.

    The ruling party urged the Nigerian people to discountenance APC and Lai Mohammed’s “petty lies,” assuring all arms of government were patriotically committed to discharging their constitutionally-prescribed responsibilities and duties.

    He said: “We believe that the APC’s unconscionable alarm is part of its characteristic and habitual propaganda through which it has over and over again imposed its skewed agenda on many undiscerning Nigerians.

    “We are constrained to take this opportunity to paint an accurate portrait of the APC and its leaders. It is time for us to expose them for what they really are. The truth is that they are agents of destabilisation.

    “These are comprise of retrogressive elements that are desperate to take power just for the sake of it. If they ever succeed in taking power in this country, God forbid, they will take the country back into darkness because they represent darkness and everything that is reprehensible.

    “We, as a party, will not allow them to damage the good work that the PDP, most especially the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan, has done to transform our nation.

    “The APC can go on its illusive flight of self-importance, but it is now increasingly clear to every Nigerian at home and in the Diaspora as well as members of the International Community that the opposition party is excessively desperate for presidential power and has imported unrestrained violence into our body-politic.

    “The truth is that they cannot win the forthcoming elections and they know it. That is why they have come up with the allegation of Interim National Government. Those who want Interim National Government are the APC and some elements that are secretly behind their party.

    “Their plan is to prepare a fertile ground upon which to discredit our anticipated victory at the polls, unleash anarchy and violence on the country after they lose so that we would not be able to enjoy our victory. By the grace of God and the support of a vast majority of Nigerians, their plan will fail.

    Fani-Kayode accused the APC of subjecting the nation to what he described as a dress rehearsal of the monumental violence that the  party was planning.

  • APC shielding Buhari from debate – PDP

    Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential campaign organisation on Friday flayed the decision of the All Progressives Congress (APC) to shun the presidential debate being organised by the Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria (BON).

    In a statement signed by its Director of Media and Publicity, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, the PDP said the APC was trying to shield its presidential candidate, Gen. Mohammadu Buhari’s “intellectual laziness” and “inability to constructively engage contemporary national issues” in a live television and radio debate.

    The statement said the APC knew that Buhari would flunk it if subjected to the rigours of debate on issues of national governance and development.

    Fani-Kayode said the APC had already expressed its concerns when approached by an unnamed international news channel for a debate, about the intellectual acumen of Buhari, and had assured the said news channel that it was only comfortable with its vice presidential candidate, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, who has capacity to feature brilliantly on the programme.

    “We have just read a report in the media credited to the APC Presidential Campaign Organisation that the party would not allow its candidate, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, to participate in the radio and television presidential debate organised by the Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria (BON).

    “The APC accused the organisers of the debate of unhidden bias and campaign of calumny by some key organisers of the programme against the corporate political interest of the party and its candidates.

    “Whilst we will not bother ourselves with the many reasons adduced by the APC, we wish to state that we see the APC decision as an attempt to shield its presidential candidate from displaying his intellectual laziness and inability to constructively engage contemporary national issues in a live television and radio debate.

    “We had envisaged that the APC would be reluctant to expose Buhari to the rigours of a live television debate because the opposition party knows that its candidate will flunk it.
    “If the APC truly believes that it is a party of progressive intellectuals, as it claims, it should allow Buhari to prove that at the debate.

    “Should the APC fail to participate in the debate, it would also show the disdain both the party and its candidate have for the Nigerian people, denying them the opportunity to make informed choices on the basis of what each candidate will articulate as propositions on issues that will be raised.

    “We are convinced that Buhari does not have what it takes to sustain a coherent argument on germane issues of governance and development.

    “We challenge Buhari to a debate on any national and international medium of mass communication and our candidate, President Goodluck Jonathan will be ready to participate.

    “On the other hand, President Jonathan’s running mate, Vice President Namadi Sambo, is also ready to participate in the debate and any other debate.

    “Our presidential candidate and his running mate will not raise flimsy and escapist excuses such as ‘unhidden bias’ and the like, since we believe that they are well-rounded intellectuals who have been prepared by their experience in office to answer any question under the sun on the governance of our nation.”

  • Fani-Kayode denies tampering with e-mail document on Buhari

    The Director of Media and Publicity of President Goodluck Jonathan’s campaign organisation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, has denied tampering with an electronic mail sent to one Sadiq Alabi by the Cambridge University archives regarding the certificate of the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Gen. Muhammadu Buhari.

    Alabi’s friend, Suraj Oyewale, had accused Fani-Kayode of manipulating the said e-mail by altering some of the contents for sinister reasons.

    The original e-mail sent to Alabi by Cambridge Archives Delivery Officer, Jacky Emerson, confirmed that the institution offered Hausa language in its West African School Certificate in 1961.
    Oyewale accused Fani-Kayode of doctoring the said e-mail, inserting extraneous contents which tended to denigrate the person and reputation of Gen. Buhari into the original mail.

    But Fani-Kayode has denied tampering with the said e-mail.

    A statement issued on Tuesday by his aide, Mr. Sufuyan Ojeifo, said Fani-Kayode was not aware of the existence of the said e-mail.

    The statement said: “Chief Fani-Kayode wishes to state clearly that he never issued a statement signed by him in his capacity as spokesperson of the PDP Presidential Campaign neither did he address a press conference nor briefing where he referred to the Cambridge document in question. He also did not validate the content of the said document on any occasion.

    “As far as he is concerned, he, as a person, does not know of the existence of the said Cambridge e-mail document and what the content is all about. He never commented on the content of the document and therefore how that translated into forgery beats the imagination. To be clear, he has not been in touch with Cambridge to request for any information in respect of the issue in question.

    “What he has done, especially during his last press conference on Gen. Buhari’s published statement of result was to make assertions to the effect that the statement of result was forged and illegally procured; and had called on the police to track down the masterminds of the forgery.

    “For the record, it is important to state that the media report on which the allegation of manipulation against Chief Femi Fani-Kayode was grounded happens to be the THISDAY news report of Monday, January 26, 2015 with the headline “Certificate Saga: Hausa Language Was Not Offered in 1961, says Report.

    “The news report was apparently muddled up in its facts and presentation in paragraph 13 wherein it said that Chief Fani-Kayode ‘claimed that he came across an e-mail dated Thursday, January, 2015 from the institution’s (Cambridge) Archives Delivery Service Officer, Jacky Emerson, to one Sodiq Alabi who requested confirmation if the examination body offered Hausa Language in the 1961 West African Examination it organized.

    “It is hereby categorically stated that there is no such press statement anywhere in the whole wide world signed by Chief Fani-Kayode wherein he made any such claim.
    “The other references to Chief Fani-Kayode in the THISDAY news report were a recall or tie-back of all that he said at his press conference in Abuja last Thursday on the forged statement of result purported to be Gen. Buhari’s.

    “The allegation of manipulation against Chief Fani-Kayode is, therefore, indicative of desperation by the opposition who should have spoken to the issue of whether or not Gen. Buhari has a certificate or not.”

  • PDP accuses Buhari of perjury over certificate

    PDP accuses Buhari of perjury over certificate

    The presidential campaign organisation of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has accused the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, of perjury.

    Addressing a press conference in Abuja on Wednesday, the Director of Media and Publicity of the organisation, Mr. Femi Fani-Kayode, urged Buhari to withdraw from the contest and to apologise to Nigerians.

    Fani-Kayode was reacting to claims by the Nigerian Army that although Buhari obtained the West African School Certificate in 1961, copies of his certificate could not be found in Army records.

    Consequently, Buhari had said he would contact authorities of the Government College, Katsina, to furnish him with copies of the certificate.

    But the PDP insisted that the APC flag bearer had committed a “grave criminal offence” under the law and constitution.

    The statement said: “Information reaching us now has shown that the presidential candidate for the All Progressives Congress (APC), Gen. Muhammadu Buhari has disclosed today in Kano at a press conference that the affidavit he swore to in which he claimed that his credentials were in the custody of the military was not true after all.

    “The implication of the action of this so-called “Mr. Clean” is nothing but perjury and we all know that this is a grave criminal offence under our laws and constitution.
    “We urge Buhari and his party to do the right thing and tender an unreserved apology to the Nigerian people, throw in the towel and report to the nearest police station for interrogation and prosecution.

    “Anything less than that would be an insult to the collective intelligence and integrity of the Nigerian people. We also urge the Nigerian Armed Forces to consider the possibility of stripping him of his rank and privileges given the fact that he was never qualified to join the Nigerian army as a commissioned officer in the first place because he never had the prerequisite qualifications which was a school certificate.

    “Given this, at best Buhari should never have been anything more than a non-commissioned officer.”

    The President’s campaign organisation also blamed Buhari and APC supporters for the reported attack by suspected thugs on the convoy of President Goodluck Jonathan during the President’s campaign rally in Katsina on Tuesday.

    “We consider that action despicable, barbaric, shameful and highly reprehensible. It shows very clearly the violent nature, disposition and character of those individuals that were involved and the presidential candidate that they support.

    “The Katsina show of shame was the first case of violence unleashed on our candidate by supporters of the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, after the signing of the historic Abuja Accord by the presidential candidates of all the parties participating in the election. The purpose of that Accord was to discourage violence before, during and after the election.

    “The laudable intention of the Accord has now been irresponsibly violated by a group of miscreants and vandals whose leader has proved to be wholly incapable of keeping them in check and restraining them from indulging in violence. It is worrisome that this kind of violent reaction would manifest when the election has not held and their candidate has not yet lost.

    “We are taking this opportunity to serve notice today that by the grace of God and the support of the well-meaning Nigerian electorate, Gen. Buhari will suffer a crushing defeat in the hands of our candidate, President Jonathan, at the polls.”

     

  • Fani-Kayode, Mohammed differ over attack on Buhari

    Fani-Kayode, Mohammed differ over attack on Buhari

    HE Director of Media and Publicity of President Goodluck Jonathan’s campaign organisation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode and the All Progressives Congress (APC) National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, differed yesterday on a plan by the PDP to direct attacks on Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, during campaign for next month’s presidential election.

    Fani-Kayode, in Abuja yesterday, said the PDP would  expose the alleged “atrocities” committed by the APC presidential candidate (Buhari), when he was in power as military head of state.

    He added that demystifying Buhari remained the main issue in the presidential campaign

    Fani-Kayode said: “It is our intention to expose Gen. Buhari for what he really is, what he stands for and the great danger that his candidacy portends for the unity of the Nigerian state, and the peace and well-being of the Nigerian people.”

    But, Mohammed said the APC was not surprised by the “outburst of Fani-Kayode”, adding that his statement was “full of contradictions.”

    The APC spokesman noted that Fani-Kayode promised that  the PDP would engage in issues based campaign, but ended up attacking the person of Buhari.

    He argued that it was true that Buhari was a former military head of state, but insisted that he has submitted himself to party politics in the last 12 years.

    The APC spokesman emphasised that “Buhari is the best man for the presidency”.

  • Jonathan’s campaign to go after Buhari – Fani-Kayode

    Jonathan’s campaign to go after Buhari – Fani-Kayode

    President Goodluck Jonathan’s campaign organisation has vowed to direct its attacks on the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, saying demystifying the former head of state remained the main issue in the president’s campaign.

    The Director of Media and Publicity of the President’s campaign team, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, who stated this at a press conference in Abuja on Wednesday, vowed to expose the “atrocities” committed by Buhari when he was in power.

    He said: “It is our dull intention to expose Gen. Muhammadu Buhari for what he really is, what he stands for and the great danger that his candidacy portends for the unity of the Nigerian state and the peace and well-being of the Nigerian people.

    “We believe that it is a struggle between light and darkness. We believe that Gen. Buhari represents the darkness and that President Jonathan represents the light.

    “We believe that Gen. Buhari represents a return to an ugly past which is best forgotten, while President Jonathan represents our hope for a greater and better future.

    “We believe that the APC, on which platform Gen. Buhari is contesting the presidential election, represents everything that is unholy and unwholesome in our society and that the Peoples Democratic Party represents all that is decent and good.

    “We believe that the much-vaunted ”change” campaign of Gen. Buhari represents nothing but a change from good to evil. If you want a positive change, you cannot expect to get it from a man like Gen. Buhari whose democratic credentials are questionable and whose record in public office is shameful and disastrous.

    “Most people do not remember the atrocities that he committed when he was in power and it is our intention to document them and remind the Nigerian people about them.

    “Most people have chosen to ignore the number of things that Gen. Buhari has said and the number of things that he has done over the last few months and years that have brought carnage, division and strife in our society and that prove that he is not the sort of person that can be trusted with power.

    “It is our intention to bring those things to the attention of the Nigerian people so that they can make an informed choice.

    “We do not believe that Nigeria ought to be run by a man that is not capable of tolerating dissent or by a political party like the APC that has no sense of remorse, restraint or decency and that is not capable of accepting a plurality of views.”

    Ironically, Fani-Kayode said the President’s campaign organisation would not indulge in cheap propaganda, mudslinging and deceit, adding that the February election is a battle for the soul and destiny of the nation.

    According to him, President Jonathan has earned the right for a second term, stressing that the country has reached the crossroads at this point in its history.

  • EFCC yet to appeal Fani-Kayode’s partial acquittal

    EFCC yet to appeal Fani-Kayode’s partial acquittal

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is still considering whether to appeal the partial acquittal of a former Minister of Aviation, Chief Femi Fani- Kayode.

    Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia of the Federal High Court in Lagos had recently discharged and acquitted Fani-Kayode of 38 out of 40 counts of alleged money laundering.

    EFCC’s lawyer, Mr Festus Keyamo, on Monday said he was still waiting for the commission’s instructions 22 days after the verdict was delivered.

    “No appeal has been filed. I’m still waiting for my client’s instructions,” he told our correspondent.

    The judge, on November 17, held that the commission did not prove the other counts sufficiently.

    She partially upheld Fani-Kayode’s no-case submission and directed him to open defence in two counts (25 and 26).

    She discharged and acquitted him of the rest of the 38 counts on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove “elements” of the allegations.

    Count 25 reads: “That you, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, on or before September 20, 2006, while serving as the Minister of Culture and Tourism, in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this court, made a transaction exceeding N500,000, which was not done through financial institution, by accepting cash payment of N1 million, which sum was further paid into your personal account number 103450252601 with First Inland Bank Plc, Apapa branch, now First City Monument Bank (FCMB), through Supo Agbaje, your administrative worker, now at large.”

    Count 26 reads: “That you, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, on or before September 20, 2006, while serving as the Minister of Culture and Tourism in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this court, made a transaction exceeding N500,000, which was not done through financial institution, by accepting cash payment of N1.1 million, which sum was further paid into your personal account number 103450252601 with First Inland Bank Plc Apapa branch, now FCMB, through Supo Agbaje, your administrative worker, now at large.”

    The alleged offences contravene the provisions of the Money Laundering (prohibition) Act, 2004.

    The trial was stalled on Monday as the defence counsel sought an adjournment.

    When the case was called, Keyamo reminded the court that the case was for the accused to enter his defence on the two counts.

    But Fani-Kayode’s lawyer, Mr. Wale Akoni (SAN), said although the matter was the defence to open its case, he would require more time to put his “house” in order.

    He, therefore, prayed the court for an adjournment to enable him regularise his processes.

    Keyamo did not oppose the application.

  • Re: Fani Kayode’s some hard   questions for Buharists

    Re: Fani Kayode’s some hard questions for Buharists

    To get involved in any discourse with Femi Fani Kayode, the ‘most brilliant’ Nigerian polemicist, must be the equivalent of throwing oneself into a conundrum

    It is curious how some scions of thoroughly illustrious Yoruba fathers easily lose it once they are close to the power loop and this is usually in spite of being very educated in their own right. Examples are too many to delay us here but writing recently on the phenomenon, Dr Jide Oluwajuyitan of The Nation attributed it to an infernal fear of having to live below the stinking opulence they were used to growing up. But should that be enough reason to lose one’s integrity and overall bearing?

    To get involved in any  discourse with  Femi Fani Kayode, the ‘most brilliant’ Nigerian polemicist, must be the equivalent of throwing oneself into a conundrum of unending self promotion by a man who so loves  President  Jonathan any criticism of the number one citizen is a dagger in his throat.  Femi obviously has more than enough reasons to love a man who has the power to cause the EFCC, or any anti-graft body for that matter, to withdraw court cases, even if there are enough grounds to secure conviction. Add to this the need for the young man to be adequately compensated for dumping the APC.  It is small matter if, like he did to former President Obasanjo, he had severally thrashed the president before his Pauline conversion in an archetypical case of crass opportunism.

    Let me briefly narrate a not too dissimilar story. I once wrote on these pages an article that was very critical of my aburo, Akin Osuntokun.  That was during the Obasanjo era when he, Fani-Kayode and Segun Awolowo were top men in the Villa with Fani Kayode  eagerly playing  the president’s armour bearer, throwing tantrums at whoever it was who disagreed with President Obasanjo on any issue.  Osuntokun, not exactly as acerbic, was not particularly far behind. That was what triggered my article.  Being Obasanjo’s blue-eyed boys, Akin could very easily have got me arrested and heavens would not have fallen.

    But he chose differently. He telephoned me, remonstrating: Egbon, you were very unkind to me in your column today and he went on to explain why, out of sympathy to an old man, he felt constrained to always defend President Obasanjo who, in truth, was having a real bad press.  I then asked him if he knew a certain Segun Awolowo to which he said, of course, yes. I went further to ask if he had ever seen him insult anybody to which he said no, even though they were both in Obasanjo’s service.

    I then reminded him that, like Segun, he too is from a lofty pedigree and should therefore be guided in whatever he does. Not once again did I see him roughly address anybody in defence of Obasanjo.  Not so a truculent Fani Kayode who forever sees himself in superlatives and as having a divine right to act with impunity. Nobody, not a Wole Soyinka or a Muhammadu Buhari, is immune to his uncultured tongue.

    Now, coming to matters of the moment, if anything surprised me in his recent tirade titled: Some Hard Questions For The Buharists, it is the statement credited to Opeyemi Agbaje, an astute professional I had interacted with severally.  According to Fani-Kayode, the following are Ope’s questions: ”How come the only debates we have in Nigeria are over a “Muslim-Muslim” ticket? How come the opposition party’s instincts are always in that direction-Nuhu Ribadu/Fola Adeola? How come a discussion of a Christian-Christian presidential ticket is completely inconceivable? How come Buhari, who even in a military regime instituted a Muslim-Muslim/North-North ruling clique along with Idiagbon and eight or nine out of 11 Supreme Military Council members, is now testing the ground again with another possible Muslim-Muslim pairing? Is it that we have a shortage of capable Christians in Nigeria?”

    Given Agbaje’s  assiduity,  these questions  should rather  be  directed to  a  president  for whom,  going to Jerusalem, when not kneeling before pastors, has  become an annual ritual.  The president it is, who not only frequents Jerusalem but ensures that jet-owning pastors are in tow. He, it is, who has completely politicised religion that integrity and efficiency have been pushed far into the background as determining factors for office. Opeyemi should cast his mind back to 2011 and tell Nigerians who and who were more qualified to take Nigeria out of its present morass than the duo of Nuhu Ribadu and Fola Adeola.  These are relatively young men you would never see romancing corruption or directing that corruption charges be withdrawn from courts; men who will never protect corrupt ministers or aides. It is essentially to mask these foibles, these predilections in some quarters, that religion has been deliberately imported, as a façade, into our politics.

    As to why not a Christian -Christian ticket, the APC as a thinking party, must reasonably walk away from the religious booby traps the president and his minders, especially the CAN leadership, have woven into our politics. A ticket of same religion has since been rendered completely unreasonable for any party that wants to win election. Nor could it be a Muslim/Muslim ticket for the same reasons and the eagerness of the Metuh’s of this world to dub the APC a Moslem party. APC is considering a Moslem Presidential candidate because equity demands that it should be the turn of the mostly Muslim North to have its turn at the presidency, come 2015, or for how long can we keep a part of the country away from power in a democracy?

    Fani Kayode also quoted the views of one Oladeji in support of his quaint views but to treat those views with more than a benign neglect is to waste precious time on nothing.  Described by Fani Kayode as a seasoned and experienced journalist on the stable of Mr Nda Isaiah’s Leadership newspaper, it should not be difficult to see where Oladeji is coming from and what motivations drive him.

    Fani Kayode’s uneasiness is, however, much simpler, as he personally elected to put himself in a bind by promising what he could not deliver.  His defecting to the APC, in the first place, is allegedly, the result of a promise he gave to a well-heeled northerner to influence the emergence of a Christian northerner as APC’s presidential candidate. He bolted the minute he saw the futility of that self-inflicted assignment. We should therefore expect more of his diatribes against APC leaders as we inch towards the elections. Only that this time around, he demonstrated a level of illogicality so unbecoming of one so seemingly brilliant.

    Among other things, he had written:

    “… in the APC-controlled Lagos State today 80 per cent of State House of Assembly members are Muslims, 80 per cent of Local Government Area Chairmen are Muslims, 80 per cent of National Assembly members are Muslims and 80 per cent of Commissioners and key government functionaries are Muslims.  It is also a fact that every single state that is under the control of the APC in the south west today is governed by a Muslim whilst 90 per cent of APC governors throughout the Federation are Muslims’. Then he concludes jubilantly: ‘That is the APC for you. With them you will never see what you will get until it is too late.”

    Now if this young man were in full control of himself, shouldn’t he have remembered that this had been the position long before the merger of the parties and the founding of APC?  This inexplainable gaffe should be enough to tell Nigerians how desperation has driven Fani-Kayode to his misadventures.

    Having also failed miserably to add any value to Senator Omisore’s quest for the governorship seat in Osun State, in respect of which he must have characteristically promised much to his new friends, and given his gift of the garb, I will advise this young man to try his schemes towards emerging a top member of the Jonathan  campaign; that is, if his  loquaciousness would not turn awry for both party and candidate.