Tag: Fayose

  • Presidency: Fayose is confused, needs prayers

    Presidency: Fayose is confused, needs prayers

    •‘He should produce evidence linking Buhari’s wife to U.S. congressman’

    THE Presidency yesterday faulted an attempt by Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose to link President Muhammadu Buhari’s wife, Aisha, to United States (U.S.) Congressman William Jefferson’s bribery scandal.

    Jefferson was convicted for the offence in 2009.

    According to a statement by the Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Malam Garba Shehu, Fayose’s position was shameless and blatant distortion of facts.

    He said the Presidency would ordinarily have ignored Fayose as he “is a man childishly obsessed with the desire to grab the headlines and insulting people at will because of his incurably boorish instincts”.

    But the Presidency, he said, decided to react on the issue in order not to allow Fayose mislead innocent Nigerians.

    He added that ignoring the governor risked giving traction and credibility to outright and brazen falsehoods inconsistent with the status of anybody that calls himself a governor or leader.

    The presidential aide explained that Mrs. Aisha Buhari had no direct, indirect or the remotest connection with William Jefferson’s corruption scandal in the U.S.

    He challenged Fayose to tell Nigerians if the so-called Aisha, whose pictures he proudly, but ignorantly shared, was the same Aisha married to President Muhammadu Buhari, or if the Aisha of his idle imagination had any relationship by blood or any relationship in whatever form with Buhari’s wife.

    He urged the governor to produce evidence from the records of investigation and subsequent trial of Jefferson to prove that the president’s wife was in anyway linked to that scandal.

    The presidential aide asked Fayose to show proof when and where Mrs. Buhari was invited for interrogation in connection with the Congressman’s bribery scandal, let alone indicted for a crime locally or abroad.

    Shehu explained that common names alone were not enough to automatically link innocent people to crimes or scandals, especially in an era of identity thieves.

    He said free speech did not entitle Fayose to falsely accuse innocent people of crimes they knew nothing about.

    He said Mrs. Buhari was entitled to protect her reputation from being recklessly maligned, stressing that political opposition was not a licence to attack people’s reputation brazenly without legal consequences.

  • Fayose accuses Fed Govt of plotting to destabilise Ekiti

    Fayose accuses Fed Govt of plotting to destabilise Ekiti

    Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose has raised the alarm, accusing the Federal Government of plots to destabilise the state with the arrest and detention of his Chief of Staff, Chief Dipo Anisulowo.

    According to the governor, four members of the state’s House of Assembly are slated for arrest and detention for alleged treason.

    Fayose, who spoke at a news conference in Abuja yesterday, said the plot was being hatched by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Mr. Babachir Lawal and an unnamed Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN).

    Fayose said: “A few days ago, we got it on good authority that there was a meeting with some politicians from Ekiti State, including an Ekiti born Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and a self-professed human rights activist by agents of the Federal Government, with the agenda solely, on how to bring down my administration as the governor of the state.

    “Activities of these elements that are obviously afraid of facing another electoral defeat in 2018 are being coordinated through the office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Mr. Babachir Lawal and the Attorney General of the Federation.

    “Certain top functionaries of the Ekiti State government and some important members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Ekiti State, and some associates of mine, have now been pencilled down for arrest and indefinite detention by the EFCC under the guise of investigating the funds spent by the PDP on the June 21, 2014 governorship election and the Presidential election.

    “The game plan is to make those to be arrested get detained indefinitely, forced to make statements incriminating me, while at the same time feeding the public with orchestrated fake reports, using their usual media organs.

    “This is coming after their failure to use the Department of State Service (DSS) to coerce members of the State House of Assembly to buy into the impeachment plot against me with a view to silencing me, being a  major voice of the opposition.

    “To achieve this sinister plot against the government and people of Ekiti State, we have been informed that some of their trusted allies in the EFCC have been mobilised to move to Ekiti any moment from now.”

    The governors advised the government and its agents to wait till the end of his tenure in 2018, when he would be available to answer any of their questions, no matter how unreasonable.

  • Fayose’s strike: Lawyer in court  for state of emergency in Ekiti

    Fayose’s strike: Lawyer in court for state of emergency in Ekiti

    Lagos-based lawyer and an indigene of Ekiti State, Kabir Akingbolu, has sued Governor Ayodele Fayose before a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos for allegedly joining workers’ strike.

    The workers are on strike over their unpaid salaries.

    Joined as co-defendants in the suit are the Attorney General of Ekiti State, the Accountant General of the Federation and the President, Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    Akingbolu, in an Originating Motion dated June 10, prayed the court to declare that the first defendant, Fayose, cannot legally embark on an industrial strike and that “his abdication of duty in a reckless abandonment” is a violation of the oath of office taken by him.

    He prayed the court for a declaration that the first defendant has lost his position as a governor, having failed to transmit power to his deputy as envisaged by the constitution.

    Akingbolu asked the court for an order directing the fourth defendant, the President, to in line with Section 305 of the Constitution, declare a state of emergency in Ekiti State to avert break down of law and order, since there is a vacuum in governance.

    He asked for an order of the court that the third defendant, the Accountant General of the Federation, should not release any allocation to Ekiti State account by virtue of the indefinite strike embarked upon by the 1st defendant.

    The plaintiff, who sought five reliefs, asked the court to determine, having regard to Section 176 of the Constitution, whether the strike embarked upon by the first defendant does not amount to abdication of duties; that considering the provision of Section 176 subsection (1) and (2) of the Constitution, whether the abdication of duty by the first defendant is not a violation of the Oath of office taken by him as the governor.

    He urged the court to determine, “having regard to the combined effect of Sections176 and 183 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999(as amended, whether the first defendant can legally embark on an Industrial strike; considering the combine provisions of Sections 176, 183, 189, and 190 of the 1999 Constitution(as amended), whether the  defendant has not lost his position as a governor since he has failed to transmit power to his deputy as envisaged by the constitution before embarking on the strike.

    He further asked the court to determine that “given the state of the law with regard to the office of the governor, whether a governor who abdicated his position without transmitting power to the deputy when he is not capable of discharging his duties as a governor is not deemed to have forfeited his seat for abscondment.

    He added that given the provision of Section 305 of the Constitution on the power of President to declare a state of emergency in any state of the Federation, whether the fourth defendant is not justified to declare a state of emergency in Ekiti State in view of the strike embarked upon by the first defendant.

    No date has been fixed for hearing.

  • Fayose: Ekiti won’t contribute to school feeding programme

    Fayose: Ekiti won’t contribute to school feeding programme

    The school feeding rogramme proposed by the Federal Government should be done without any financial contribution from the states, Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose said yesterday.

    He said it was wrong for the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led Federal Government to ask state governments for a 40 per cent counterpart funding for the project.

    “The Federal Government is already looking for excuses for the impending failure of the programme by asking states to contribute 40 per cent to the scheme,” Fayose said in a statement.

    He said the school feeding programme was purely a contract between the APC-led Federal Government and Nigerians.

    “Were the states consulted before the APC made the promise during the presidential campaign?” the governor queried.

    “How can you make a promise and win election on the basis of that promise and now expect states to help you to fulfil the promise? That to me is fraud,” he added.

    According to Fayose, Ekiti State and other states in the country deserve to benefit from the programme without assisting the Federal Government with any 40 per cent counterpart funding.

    The governor said the APC-led Federal Government should rather blame itself for failing to do proper study on the practicability of the scheme before promising Nigerians, instead of looking for who to blame for not fulfilling the school feeding promise.

    “Apart from the fact that Ekiti State lacked the financial wherewithal to provide counterpart fund for such a programme, it is the duty of President Muhammed Buhari and his APC that won election on the basis of their promise to give free meal to school pupils to fulfil the promise without placing any burden on other tiers of government.

    “Nigerians should come to terms with the reality that the Federal Government is already looking for a ready alibi for the impending failure of the school feeding programme.

    “The Federal Government knows that 80 per cent of the states lack the financial will to be able to contribute the 40 per cent counterpart fund for the programme and the time the programme eventually fails, Nigerians will be told that it failed because states did not key in to it.

  • Fayose phantasmagoria

    The above headline sounds like the title of an epic poem isn’t it? For that land thick with intellectuals as there thickets, Ekiti State today presents a perfect setting for literary works of magical propensities. As events shift rapidly from the farcical to the absurd, the stage seems being set for a dire denouement.

    If you are minded like Hardball, you are bound to be apprehensive about the turn of events in the country generally. But the Ekiti situation comes with peculiarly unnerving presentiments. To put it plaintively and unbeknown to many, governance has crashed in many states across the country for sure. What we see daily is a façade that is bound to be stripped of its cover sooner.

    But Ekiti seems to take the prize. With the giddy over-lordship of a fellow who goes by the tag, Ayo Fayose moving in frenziedly from the bohemian farce to the apocalyptic, many discerning minds are furrowed with deep worries. Lines from Y.B.Yeats’ “The Second coming” keep flashing across the mind:

    Turning and turning in a widening gyre…

    Workers in Ekiti State have been on strike since May 26, for non-payment of salaries for several months. Ekiti is not the only state where citizens have been reduced to destitution by popinjay governors. But Governor Fayose makes an especial mockery of this deathly human condition.

    He is inured. He responds with a most juvenile broadcast recently: “I want to tell workers that I have placed myself on indefinite strike in solidarity with you. I shared (sic) your pains but it is rather unfortunate that a man cannot give what he doesn’t have.

    “I have told you the true position of the finances of the state, of which you have played critical roles in the allocation of the federal allocations (sic) to relevant sectors which shows how well I have carried you along (sic) since the dwindling revenue to state commenced (sic)…

    “… But the present situation is very unfortunate and we have to learn to live with it until the country wriggle (sic) out of it and things will change for better.

    “I want to say that I will be expecting you back to your offices when you are ready to return to work. I shall be expecting you because presently (sic) I am handicapped and there is nothing I can do…”

    An elementary school valedictorian would have mustered a better address. But he did not stop at this nonsensical talk, he made a show of marching on the streets with workers.

    And in a moment of uncommon candour, he noted above that “I am handicapped, there is nothing I can do”

    Brilliant self- analysis; Fayose is truly handicapped. And Yeats gives more perspective:

    The best lack conviction, while the worst

    Are full of passionate intensity

    But what Fayose can do is to resign immediately.

  • Fayose, APC trade accusations over Ekiti debt profile

    Fayose, APC trade accusations over Ekiti debt profile

    •Party urges DMO to clarify state’s liability

    Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose and the All Progressives Congress (APC) have disagreed over the state actual debt profile.

    The governor alleged that the N25 billion bonds taken from the capital market and N31 billion commercial loans taken by the Kayode Fayemi administration were responsible for his inability to pay workers’ salaries.

    But the APC, while admitting that its administration led by Dr. Fayemi took the N25 billion bond to execute legacy projects, described Fayose’s allegation of taking another N31 billion commercial loan as a “blatant lie which is far from the truth”.

    The party called on the Debt Management Office (DMO) of the Federal Ministry of Finance to speak out and clarify Ekiti’s debt status.

    The APC, in a statement also yesterday by its spokesman, Taiwo Olatunbosun, said a clarification from DMO has become imperative.

    The statement accused the governor of “giving inconsistent figures on different occasions that had cast doubts on the integrity of the state’s financial application.”

    Fayose, in a statement yesterday by his Chief Press Secretary, Idowu Adelusi, alleged that N1.2 billion is being deducted monthly from the state’s allocation to service loans obtained by the Fayemi administration.

    He accused the APC of “gingering Labour to remain adamant on the issue of strike”.

    The governor claimed that if the N1.2 billion being deducted is added to the state’s monthly allocations, his administration will not owe workers.

    Fayose said he was surprised that when Fayemi took the loans, which allegedly made payment of workers’ salaries difficult, the labour did not kick against the move.

    The governor alleged that the strike had been politicised because of his “criticism of the bad policies of the Federal Government and his fight against tyranny”.

    He wondered why some states where workers were owed more salaries than Ekiti were still enjoying the understanding of labour.

    Fayose accused the Fayemi administration of inflating figures of the monthly Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) for “political reasons and giving the labour wrong information and false hope”.

    “A state like Ekiti without any industry and Fayemi administration would post that it realised between N600 million and N700 millio0n monthly from IGR whereas in the actual sense Ekiti IGR had never gone beyond N300 million or N350 million monthly,” the governor said.

    Fayose said he was surprised that the labour, which praised him for transparency, was now blackmailing him as if he had kept Ekiti money somewhere.

    “The labour should hold the Fayemi Administration responsible for the economic woes in the state and stop castigating me,” Fayose said.

    He said: “During my first term, I did not borrow a dime to run the state. I paid salaries on 22nd of every month. When I was going in October 2006, I left N10.4 billion in government coffers.

    “As a responsible governor, the state cannot be financially buoyant and I will refuse to pay the workers. A child cannot ask a good father for fish and the father will give him stone. I have been sounding the warning about the nation’s economy since last year.”

    The governor explained: “For the N25 billion bond Fayemi took from the capital market, the state pays over N600 million monthly to service it and we will pay till 2022.

    “On the bond money, there is an irrevocable standing order for the monthly deductions; the Federal Government has no power over that. It was the commercial loans they took that were converted to bail-out funds by the Federal Government and we pay over N300 million to service the debts monthly and that will subsist till 2036.

    “Also, they left debts on fertilser, vehicles purchased for different reasons and groups and other commitments for which over N100 million is deducted from our monthly allocation. If these funds are not deducted and we have them at hand, our situation would have been better than this.”

    Denying Fayose’s allegations, Olatunbosun said: “In a programme he appeared on Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) recently, he put the deductions at N1.5 billion. But again few days later on Africa Independent Television (AIT), he said the figure is N600 million. We make bold to say that Fayose’s claim of N1. 2 billion deduction from Ekiti monthly allocation is total fallacy and Fayose’s creation to justify his inability to pay workers’ salary.

    “How he spent the bailout was not clear because he collected the bailout cash of N9.6 billion at the time Ekiti was owing only one month salary, which he falsely quoted at N2.6 billion and so how he spent N9.6 billion to pay a month salary remains unclear.”

    Accusing Fayose of “deliberate and malicious misrepresentation of facts”, he challenged him to produce in writing, the purported commendation he received from the EFCC and the ICPC over the N9.6 billion bailout fund he is yet to account for.

    On Fayose’s claim that the Fayemi administration borrowed another N31 billion commercial loan apart from the N25 billion bond, Olatunbosun challenged Fayose to provide evidence of this loan and what it was used for “since records are there in the office of the Account General if he is sure of his facts”.

    “The truth of the matter is that Fayose has resorted to blatant lies to cover up his many shady financial transactions and misapplication of state funds,” the APC spokesman said.

    On Fayose’s allegation that the IGR of the state was never N600 million during the Fayemi administration, Olatunbosun referred him to the published audited accounts of the state signed by the then Auditor General “instead of persistent lies to cover up his financial recklessness which accounted for his inability to pay workers.

    Urging the governor to present the schedules of payments as he claimed for public scrutiny, the APC spokesman said it was not enough to deceive the public that he always presented federal allocation receipts to workers to see first-hand the financial status of the state.

    He added that actual monthly receipts and myriads of unbearable taxes imposed on Ekiti people and pupils in primary schools did not support his claim of cash squeeze.

    He said: “Fayose only wants to confuse Ekiti people with the ‘more you look, the less you see’ analysis of the financial position of the state that has become his trademark.”

    “On his claim that he left N10 billion in Ekiti coffers during his aborted first tenure, this is a lie that has been debunked many times.

    “Fayose, who is an advocate of governments not borrowing beyond their tenure and vowed on his inauguration in 2014 not to borrow kobo during his tenure, has already borrowed N19.6 billion, which deduction is obviously beyond his tenure, thus showing his insincerity and demagoguery, Olatunbosun said.

  • Alleged travel ban: Fayose petitions NHRC, UN, others

    Alleged travel ban: Fayose petitions NHRC, UN, others

    Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose has petitioned the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) over a claim that the Federal Government had placed travel ban on him.

    The petition filed on his behalf by the state’s House of Assembly also complained about the alleged refusal of an agent of the Federal Government, the Department of State Services (DSS), to obey a Federal High Court judgment, ordering it to pay N5 million damages on the illegal arrest and detention for 18 days of a member of the House, Afolabi Akanni.

    The National Assembly, Amnesty International, Embassies of the United States (U.S.) and the United Kingdom (UK) were also copied with the petition.

    Fayose, few weeks ago, wrote to Chinese government, urging it to refuse financial aid to the Federal Government.

    The petition signed by the Speaker, Kolawole Oluwawole, was submitted yesterday in Abuja, to NHRC’s Executive Secretary, Prof. Bem Angwe, who assured that his commission would investigate the petition.

    The Deputy Speaker, Ekiti State House of Assembly, Segun Adewumi, who submitted the petition, was accompanied by the Chairman, House Committee on Information, Gboyega Aribisogan and Chairman House Committee on Health, Dr. Samuel Omotoso.

    The petition reads: “We write to bring to your attention another impending infringement on the rights of the Governor of our state, Mr. Ayodele Fayose and by extension the entire Ekiti by the Federal Government.

    “A few weeks ago, our governor was reliably informed that President Muhammadu Buhari had directed that he should be banned from travelling outside Nigeria. This reliable information was to be confirmed through reports in two major national dailies on Sunday, May 29, 2016 titled: ‘2 govs under watch, face travel ban’.

    “From our findings, one of the governors being referred to is our own governor, and we wish to state like we have always done that we, the members of Ekiti State House of Assembly are with the governor on everything that he does.

    “Even ordinary Nigerians do not require clearance from the Department of State Services (DSS) or any security agency to travel outside Nigeria unless in compliance with court order, and as at today, there is no court order placing travel restriction on our governor. Issues concerning Governor Fayose cannot even be entertained in any court by virtue of the immunity he enjoys as provided in Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    “We however know as always that this latest plot is as a result of our governor’s critical stance on President Buhari’s government and its anti-people’s policies, and we make bold to say that no amount of intimidation, harassment and oppression will cowed the governor from exercising his fundamental rights to freedom of expression and to hold opinions as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended).

    “We are aware that this is coming as a result of the failure of the President Buhari-led APC government’s plot to use the DSS to coerce the House of Assembly members into the plot of removing the governor.”

    The lawmakers said it was worrisome that the Federal Government would consider the idea of compelling a sitting governor in Nigeria that enjoys Constitutional Immunity like the President to obtain clearance from the Director General DSS, who is an appointee of the President before travelling out of Nigeria.

    The letter noted  that in 1984 when President Buhari was a military Head of State, late Chief Obafemi Awolowo was prevented from travelling outside Nigeria for medical treatment, “thereby leading to his (Awolowo) untimely death in 1987”.

    It added: “The international passports of late Ooni of Ife, Oba Okunade Sijuwade; late Emir of Kano Alhaji Ado Bayero and late Obi of Onitsha, Ofala Akulalia Alphonsus Ogugua were also seized and they were restricted to their palaces just because they travelled to Israel for business.

    “We therefore wish to state on behalf of Governor Ayodele Fayose that as an opposition figure, he cannot be cowed by this pettiness from the presidency.”

    Angwe commended members of the House of Assembly for their commitment to the sustenance of rule of law in the country and cooperation with the executive arm of government in Ekiti State.

     

     

  • Fayose’s order against herdsmen condemnable, says brother

    Fayose’s order against herdsmen condemnable, says brother

    Oluwasegun Fayose, the Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose’s eldest brother , has condemned the latter for instructing farmers to attack herdsmen.

    He said the governor’s directive did not portray him as a true leader.

    Oluwasegun, in an interview with The Nation in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, said his brother was embarrassing the family by some of his actions and utterances.

    According to him, “leaders are not supposed to make comments that are capable of inciting the public or bringing their family’s name into disrepute.

    “I totally disagree with him. I do not like what he is doing. He is dragging the family name in the mud. I read in national dailies that Ayo Fayose was inciting Ekiti people against herdsmen.

    “I have never seen where a leader talks like this before. I spent most of my life in Europe. I left Nigeria in 1976. My children are still there. I want them to be able to come home. I do not want to be harassed. Let it be on record that I do not support this kind of aggressive method of governance. He is too vulgar for my liking.”

    Rather than making utterances that do not portray him and the Fayose family as noble, Oluwasegun advised, the governor should keep quiet.

  • NLC to Mimiko, Fayose: non-payment of workers’ salaries a crime

    The Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) at the weekend told governors of Ondo and Ekiti states that non-payment of salaries to workers is a crime.

    In separate letters to Ondo State Governor Olusegun Mimiko and his Ekiti State counterpart, Ayodele Fayose, NLC President Ayuba Wabba said though the congress was aware of the economic challenges facing the country, it was not an excuse to owe workers and pensioners.

    Wabba, in his letter to Mimiko, said: “We are not unaware of the present socio-economic challenges in the country.  However, in our estimation, this should not be an acceptable reason for not paying five months salaries and pensions at the level of the state, and four months salaries and pensions at the level of local government and teachers.

    “Sir, you do not need a lecture from anyone to know that non-payment of salaries and pensions for months on end, constitutes a crime against the workers, pensioners and their families, whose lives and obligation to man and God and their sense of self-worth have been put in jeopardy.

    “As one with activist background and one with whom we have had collaboration, these issues are clear and self-evident, and therefore need no belabouring.

    “Your excellency, in these difficult moments in our nation, we no doubt have limited choices, but choices, all the same.  One of these choices is to take a critical look at government expenditure, especially in the areas of political appointments, patronage and allied costs.

    “We similarly call for the renewed drive in the internally-generated revenue.  We have reason to believe that when these initiatives are complimented by the bail-out funds released by the Federal Government, the twin issues of salaries and pensions will not be such a burden.

    “As we noted in our letter to you on the 40th anniversary celebration of Ondo State, you have left a legacy.  We urge you to do all that is necessary to sustain this legacy.  Accordingly, we will not relent in urging you to put in motion the necessary logistics for the commencement of the payment of these salaries and pensions”.

    Wabba also asked Fayose to take steps to bring the strike to an end.

    He said the congress was ready to act as a mediator between the striking workers and the state government to find a solution to the dispute.

    “The issues that led to this strike action are well-known to you and include the non-payment of five months’ salary arrears and pensions; non-implementation of promotion report since 2014; issues around staff verification exercise in 2015; and refusal of government to disclose the actual monthly IGR.

    “We are not unconcerned about the prevailing socio-economic challenges in the polity.  In our view, however, this does not constitute an acceptable rationale for owing workers and pensioners for so long.  A labourer, the Holy Books, tell us, deserves his wages.  Stripped of his wages, he is reduced to a slave without rights or privileges.

    “In the instant case, the workers and pensioners in the state have been pulverised into submission due to the default in the payment of their salaries and pensions to the extent that they are unable to perform their obligations to God, man and the state.

    “We believe this painful situation could be minimised, if not entirely reduced, if government gives consideration to managing the cost of governance, raising the IGR profile and appropriately applying the bail-out funds given by the Federal Government.

    “We urge you to bring this strike action speedily to an end by commencing the process of payment and establishing a platform for dialogue at which the leadership of the workers at the state level could be availed of what accrues to the coffers of the state monthly.

  • Fayose: why l’m unable to pay workers

    Fayose: why l’m unable to pay workers

    •Ekiti governor writes NLC

    Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose has replied the President of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Ayuba Wabba, attributing the state’s inability to pay workers salary regularly to the current downturn in the nation’s economy and the heavy loan burden left by his predecessor.

    The governor, in his response to the NLC President’s letter on the ongoing workers strike in the State, called on the NLC to join the advocacy for fiscal restructuring in Nigeria with a view to reviewing the federation allocation formula in favour of states, towards a lasting solution to the palpable indigent status of most states.

    The letter reads: “I write to acknowledge your correspondence on the current strike action by workers in Ekiti State and I thank you for the expression of concern for the welfare of workers and suggestions on boosting internally generated revenue.

    “I want to state clearly that the issues listed in the statement represent the claims of the leadership of Labour in Ekiti State upon which their rather hasty resort to industrial action was premised.

    Government does not agree with most of the  issues, as stated by labour, and had since commenced dialogue with them. The discussions are ongoing and I hope that ressolution(s) will be achieved soon.

    “Let me put on record, the demonstrable commitment of my Government to governance principles of accountability, transparency and commitment to the welfare of workers.

    “It is an open secret that I paid workers on or before the 22nd of each month during my first tenure.

    “It is also known that the current economic downturn is a national issue and consequently the inability of most state governments to meet wage obligations as at when due.

    “Our case is further made more precarious in Ekiti State by the heavy burden of debt left by the immediate past APC government on which over N1 billion is being deducted from the state allocation monthly.”