Tag: Federal Capital Territory (FCT)

  • Court urged to halt demotion of policemen

    The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) has been urged to halt an exercise by the Police Service Commission (PSC) to demote some police officers recently promoted for “gallantry and superlative performances.”

    The request if contained in a fundamental rights enforcement suit the incorporated Trustees of the Initiative Against Human Rights Abuse and Torture.

    It is the plaintiff’s contention that the nation’s extant laws prohibit punishment being applied for an offence which was not in existence as at the time of its commission, just as no policy or law can be applied in retrospect.

    The suit filed on Tuesday has the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the PSC as defendants.

    The group’s Field Coordinator, Chukwuma Unamka stated, in a supporting affidavit, that the affected policemen, promoted between 2015 to date, contacted the plaintiff organisation and expressed their fears of impending demotion exercise.

    He added:”They were among the officers of the Nigerian police force promoted from 2015 to date under the special promotion practice of the Nigerian police force

    “Before their promotion, many other officers of the Nigerian Police Force from 1999 to 2015 had benefited from the practice and till date none of them had been demoted for that reason.

    “The police force has a promotion procedure, but the said procedure for many years allowed for an exception wherefore instead of waiting for 3 years and attendances of course for promotions, officers who had distinguished work either as aides or rescue teams who had performed very well, were promoted.

    “There was also a practical exception, where officers who had waited for so long before their last promotion but who are seen to deserve more were promoted to be at par with their contemporaries.

    “This practice had been on, until recently when the 2nd respondent reviewed same and condemned the practice in their press release dated 14th September, 2018 stated that such practice should never occur again and called on the 1st respondent to ensure so.

    “They have received on good information that there is a move to demote them to their previous ranks on the orders of the 2nd respondent and that it should affect only officers promoted from 2015 to date.

    “If nothing is done swiftly to stop this, it would lead to a breach of their rights to freedom from discrimination and it will be most unjust.

    “The new policy to trash the practice of special promotion should be a new one as it is and not meant to demote any officer promoted at the time it was not in operation or in force.

    “It will be discriminatory to demote the 2015 to date category and leave others who have benefited from the same practice.”

    Read Also: Court remands husband in prison over wife’s death

    The plaintiff wants the court to make an order directing the respondents to cease action on the demotion of any of the officers, as any action so taken will amount to a breach of Section 42 and 36 (8) of the Constitution.

    It also seeks an order enforcing the fundamental right of the applicant to freedom from discrimination and fair hearing and right not to be punished for an act which at the time it was committed was a matter of practice’’.

    The plaintiff also seeks a declaration that the practice of special promotions within the Nigerian Police Force, which led to the promotion of police officers from 2015 date, is proper and legitimate and any attempt to demote any of the officers so promoted in line with the recent press release of the 1st and 2nd  respondents dated 14th September, 2018, would amount to breach of  the affected officers’ rights to freedom from discrimination and right not to be punished for an act which  was not an offence in practice at the time it was done as provided in sections 42 and 36 (8) of the Constitution.

  • Court urged to stop APC’s ‘exorbitant fees’

    Party member claims huge fees hamper citizens’ right to parcipate in governance

     

    The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja has been urged to declare as unlawful the decision of the ruling All Progressives Party (APC) to charge “exorbitant fees” for forms for elective positions.

    The court is equally asked to restrain the APC from further selling its nomination and expression of interest forms at the current fees on the grounds that such huge cost hampers citizens’ right to participate in election and governance processes.

    The above form part of the prayers in a suit filed on Wednesday by an aggrieved member of the APC in Delta State, Chief Sunny Ofehe, who said he planned to contest the state’s governorship seat on the platform of the APC.

    The suit marked: CV/2717/18, filed by Ofehe’s lawyer, Malachy Ugwummadu, has the APC and its National Chairman, Adams Oshiomhole, as  defendants.

    Ofehe, who stated that he had built political structures across the state in his bid to actualise his governorship aspiration in the 2019 election, described the sum of N22.5m imposed by the APC on governorship aspirants as “unreasonable”, “huge”,  “excessive” and “prohibitive”.

    He argued that “the increase of the fees of the expression of interest and nomination forms from existing N500,000 and N5m to N2.5m and N20m, respectively” was “oppressive”.

    Ofehe further argued that by virtue of Article 2,9(i), 9(9.3) of the APC constitution 2014 (as amended) and sections 176 and 177 of the Nigerian Constitution,  he is, being a bonafide member of the party, qualified to seek nomination for the governorship position of Delta State on the platform of the APC.

    Read Also: $10.1b cash demand: MTN takes CBN, AGF to court

    He equally argued that by virtue of sections 40, 42 (1) (2) of the Nigerian Constitution, and more particularly section 87(3) of the Electoral Act 2010, the court “is sufficiently vested with both the vires and jurisdiction to guarantee that the plaintiff is accorded equal and unfettered access and opportunity to belong, associate and participate in the affairs of the1st defendant”.

    In an affidavit of urgency he filed with the suit, Ofehe stated that it would be in the interest of justice to hear the matter expeditiously”   because  “the return of the forms has been fixed for Wednesday, September 12, 2018.”

    Ofehe who said he had “printed posters, consulted widely, engaged agents, provided administrative and campaign offices across the state”, would be foreclosed from participating in the process if the case was not assigned and heard urgently.

    The plaintiff argued that, by virtue of the provision of Article 13 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, the imposition of the allegedly exorbitant fees had precluded or foreclosed him from freely participating in the government of his country and Delta State.

    The plaintiff wants the court to declare the fees as “oppressive, discriminatory, exclusionary, illegal, unconstitutional and therefore, null and void”.

    He also wants the court to declare, among others, “That the imposition of the excessive sum of N22.5m as fees for expression of interest and nomination forms for governorship position in the primaries of the 1st defendant (APC) is oppressive, discriminatory, exclusionary, illegal, unconstitutional and therefore, null and void.”

    Ofehe prayed the court to declare “that the trend and practice of imposition of huge, prohibitive and excessive charges and fees on political office aspirants including the plaintiff is provenance of corruption in Nigerian politics”.

    He also urged the court to make an order “mandating the defendants to revert to the previous and original fees payable for expression of interest and nomination forms for the post of governorship position in the primaries of the 1st defendant”.

    The plaintiff is equally seeking “an order of perpetual injunction restraining the 1st defendant from selling, collecting and acting on nomination form for governorship position at the cost of, 22,500,000.

    He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from continuing with the sales of nomination form and payment for expression of interest for governorship position in the primaries of the 1st defendant in the exorbitant and unreasonable cost of N22, 500,000.”

    Ofehe filed, along with the substantive suit, a motion ex-parte for interim injunctions and a motion on notice for interlocutory injunctions.

    Among the interim injunctions, he seeks, include an order of interim injunction restraining the defendants from “implementing, collecting or further collecting” the sum of N22.5m as the fees for nomination and expression of interest forms for the governorship position.

    He wants an order of interim injunction “stopping aspirants for the scheduled APC party primaries in Delta State from returning or further returning the collected nomination and expression interest forms”.

    Ofehe wants the court to restrain the defendants from further receiving “the already collected forms from governorship aspirants in Delta State”.

    He urged the court to grant the interim orders of injunction pending the hearing of his motion on notice for interlocutory injunctions.

    The case is yet to be assigned for hearing.

  • APC Primaries: We will respect guidelines – Oshiohmole

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) has pledged to ensure compliance with the electoral guidelines, fairness and justice as well as observe all the principles of internal democracy while conducting its forthcoming party primaries.

    The National Chairman of the APC, Comrade Adeams Oshiomhol, gave the assurance when he spoke to State House correspondents at the end of the APC Caucus meeting held at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, on Tuesday night.

    He confirmed that the meeting discussed the upcoming party primaries based on the Timetable and Schedule of Activities for the 2019 general elections as released by the Independent National Electoral Commission ( INEC ) in January.

    The News men report that the timetable covered the Presidential, National and State Assembly, Governorship and the Federal Capital Territory ( FCT ) Council elections.

    The timetable, which was issued by the INEC Chairman, Prof. Yakubu Mahmoud, in Abuja, indicated that party primaries for the Presidential, Governorship, Federal and State Elections would begin on Aug. 18 to end on Oct. 7, 2018.

    The Federal Capital Territory Area Council Elections would commence on Sept. 4 to end on Oct. 27.

    According to Oshiohmole, the APC is obliged to comply with the INEC guidelines because the rules are derived from the provisions of the nation’s Electoral Act.

    “The meeting just had a conversation around the forthcoming primaries.
    “As you know, based on INEC timetable on primaries, this is the season from the President down to House of Assembly and the exercise must end on Oct. 7 according to INEC guidelines.

    “We are obliged to comply with the guidelines because the guidelines are derived from the provisions of the Electoral Act.

    “So, we basically discussed how to ensure full compliance with the INEC guidelines and also ensure that that we observe all the principles of internal democracy, participation, ensuring fairness and justice.

    “I think those are the issues basically,’’ he said.

    The chairman maintained that APC as the governing party had since resolved to respect the electoral act and the APC’s constitution while conducting its activities to ensure justice for all members.

    Read Also: Zeus Polls predicts big APC win in 2019

    He announced that the resolutions at the APC Caucus meeting would be tabled at the National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting of the party fixed for Thursday for deliberation and possible endorsement.

    “By Thursday we will go to NEC where the formal decisions will be rectified and once they are rectified there will be no problem; they are not being kept because every member of the party and indeed Nigerian are entitled to know how we agreed about the exercise.

    “But I think everybody has confidence that we will do very credible primaries to ensure that those who fly the flag of the party have the mandate of their various constituencies,’’ Oshiomhole said.

    The meeting was attended by Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo and members of the National Executive Committee of the APC led by its chairman.
    Others at the meeting were APC governors of Borno, Jigawa, Niger, Plateau, Kogi, Adamawa, Ondo, Kano, Ogun, Oyo, Katsina, Osun, Yobe, Nasarawa, Kebbi, Imo and Lagos States.

    Also at the meeting were former governor of Ekiti state, Mr Segun Oni; Majority Leader of the House of Representatives Femi Gbajabiamila; former Ebonyi governor, Mr Martin Elechi; former Borno governor Ali Sheriff; former Lagos state military administrator Buba Marwa; retired Gen. Lawrence Onoja; Chief Jim Nwobodo, and Sen. Kabiru Gaya.

    Former APC National Chairman, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun; former Enugu state governor Sylva Chime, and former Edo governor Oserheimen Osunbor also attended the meeting.

    Others that attended were the former President of the Senate Ken Nnamani; former Ekiti state governor Niyi Adebayo; former Akwa Ibom governor Godswill Akpabio; former Bayelsa governor Timipre Sylva; former Petroleum

    Minister Don Etiebet, and the Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed.
    Some members of the National Assembly from the two chambers were also in attendance.

  • Abuja light rail to cost $1.3b

    Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Malam Muhammad Bello has said that the Federal Executive Council (FCT), in 2017, approved $1.3 billion for the construction of the entire Abuja light rail project.

    He said the implementation of the project has been divided into phases, with phase 1 commissioned at the cost of $823million.

    Bello disclosed this at the inauguration of the light rail project.

    He said: “The Federal Executive Council approved the project in 2017 for construction by CCECC at a cost of US$1.3billion. We hope that the Minister of Finance would consider putting this key project in the next borrowing plans, the Minister of Budget and National Planning would agree to it, the National Assembly would approved it and that China Exim Bank would fund it as a mark of goodwill for the cordial relationship between our two countries.

    “The Abuja Rail Mass Transit System is an integral part of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Transportation Master Plan designed primarily to transport large number of commuters and goods between Satellite Towns into the Metropolitan Public Transport system and the different Phases of the Federal Capital City (FCC). The Abuja rail system is packaged into 6 Lots planned for phased development, based on preferential demand and available financial resources The Abuja Rail Mass Transit System is planned to integrate with the National Rail Network when eventually completed.

    “The Abuja rail is divided into Six (6) Lots and with total length of 290 kilometres. The Lots are: Lot3: From Transportation Centre via ldu lndustrial Zone ‘0 Nanmad’i Azikwe international Airport; Lot 4; From Kuje Satellite town to Karshi Satellite town with the  remaining legs of the Transit way line 2; Lot 5: From Kubwa via Bwari to Suleja; and Lot 6′. From Airport via Kuje and Gwagwalada to Dobi.

    “Implementation of the project has been divided into phases, with phase 1 being what we are commissioning today. The segment consists of Lot 1A & 3 with a total length of 45.3 kilometres. Lot1A: starts at ldu lndustrial Zone via Gwagwa-Diedie and terminates at Gbazango Station in Kubwa (18km); Both Lots connect at the ldu Station to enable easy passenger transfer with the National Rail line linking Kaduna  and Abuja.

    “The project cost US$823,540,545.87 funded 60% by the China- Exim Bank and 40% by the Federal Capital Territory Administration (F CTA). Scope of work include 45.3km 0f double standard gauge rail tracks a maintenance deport, training school, operations control centre and 12 Stations, Abuja Metro Station, Stadium Station, Kukwaba I (National Park Station), Kukwaba ll (Ring Road Station), Wupa Station, Idu Station, Bassaniiwa Station, Airport Station, Gwagwa Station, Deidei Station, Kagini Station and Gbazango Station.”

    The minister said that the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) has also taken delivery of the three coaches meant for initial operations while awaiting the arrival of the rolling stock of 48 coaches.

    Bello said FCTA has concluded an infrastructure soft loan agreement with Exim Bank of China for the supply of the remaining coaches, including their maintenance for three years at a cost of US$194,008,602.43 adding that the Bank would fund the project to the tune of US$157,001,049.89 (85%), while the FCTA would bring in a counterpart fund of US$37,007,552.54 (15%).

    He said: “the rail tracks, signalling, stations and other infrastructure were completed in December, 2017, 6 months ago. In line with International best practices, we spent 2 months testing the rail system without passengers, one month with passengers. i am pleased to state that the Federal Ministry of Transportation after working closely with our team of Engineers, the Construction Company China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) and the protect Consultants, Messrs Transurb Technical Ltd has granted the Abuia Rail Mass Transit Project (ARMT) (Lot 3 & Lot 1A) Safety Certificate for Commercial Operations. We have also worked and are working closely with the Nigerian Railway Corporation (NRC) In the implementation of the project and they have granted relevant approvals for Operations.

  • Abuja revs master plan machine

    The Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja is one of the fastest growing cities in the world. Its population, now at  2.5 million, is also growing rapidly.

    What about order in the city?

    Every administration has always sought to keep the nation’s capital tidy through a master plan drawn up strictly for that purpose. The plan envisages a city where houses are built in proper places, not anywhere the builders please.

    During the era of former FCT minister who is now the Kaduna State governor, Malam Nasir el-Rufai, most residents of the FCT were made to comply with the master plan even when the then minister was tagged “an evil man” for demolishing illegal structures.

    Findings revealed that many just do whatever they like without following the rule of law guiding the city.

    Successive governments after that of el-Rufai have been trying to maintain the legacy he left behind despite the difficulty and challenges.

    As the 2019 elections draw near, the authorities in the FCT want everyone to behave themselves. Do not put up anything in the wrong place, or you will see the master plan machine coming after you.

    The Coordinator of Abuja Metropolitan Management Council (AMMC), Umar Shuaibu, in an interview with Abuja Review vowed to strictly follow the Abuja Master Plan no matter who may oppose it.

    Shuaibu said any building without approval will be demolished, bemoaning the level of vandalism going on in the city.

    “This year alone,” he said, “we have paid N1.5 billion on electricity. So you can see how expensive it is and what we are facing. Many people are bent on defacing the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and by doing things contrary to the development plan of the city.”

    He also disclosed that as the 2019 elections approach, any politician, political party or individual caught pasting posters within the city centre and any unauthorised places will be fined and charged to court.

    The AMMC boss, while explaining the categories of levies, said individuals will be made to pay N500 thousand and organisations will pay N1 million.

    He spoke extensively on efforts of the agency and how to keep Abuja on the right track.

    He said, “We face so many challenges. Whenever anyone is given allocation he or she has to come to us for building plan approval. The major challenge we have here is some people will decide to cut corners even if they are given approval and start building without approval, thereby building contrary to the plan. For those that build without approval develop ghettos, building unauthorised structures and without plan. And those places might have been marked road corridors, high tension and no-go areas people develop on them.

    “All these are our major challenges. Where an area is marked for green you cannot put up a structure because when you put up a structure there it will collapse. These are also challenges. We also provide street lights, drainages but some indiscipline Nigerians who are bent on destroying Abuja master plan are stealing these facilities. We have serious vandalisation of our street lights. And the cost of providing all these facilities is high. Maintaining them is also much that is the reason why we are paying high bills to Abuja Electricity Development Company (AEDC).

    “To keep the Abuja master plan you have to enforce, that is why we are regulating and enforcing the law by ensuring that people do the right thing. When you do not enforce people will not comply. That is why you will see so many buildings that we have marked. We mark for demolition, we give notice to stop work for those who did not comply. If we are not enforcing that law Abuja will not be as beautiful as this because Abuja is developing every day and buildings are coming up every day.

    “On several occasion, we have have driven people away from a lot of places, especially at A.Y.A. You can imagine we provided bus stop at several places but people will still prefer to pick passengers at an unauthorised places within the city. We do not have any choice then to start arresting these people. In a city like Abuja we do not want to see people hawking especially at places that are not authorised. We are forced to be arresting them. Hawking in the street is not done in other capital cities across the world. We have tried to provide where the informal sector can practice there trade. We cannot allow people to deface Abuja.

    “The best option for offenders is to arrest them and take them to mobile court and charge them to pay. This step will make the people to do the right thing. Our task force are not resting in ensure that they force people to do the right thing. In the task force we have all the security operatives represented to make sure that whatever clearance that we need is achieved.

    “In the cause of this job we have been receiving threats from the individuals that though that they are above the law and can do anything. Most time they beat our people on duty. Anybody that past posters at an unauthorised place will be charged to court. For individual the fine is N500 thousand and for organisation is one million Naira. People must know that they cannot past posters anywhere in Abuja now.

    “We have gone to political parties and we have carried out several campaigns to let them know that posters are not to be pasted anyhow in Abuja. In doing our job we are only managing the little resources at our disposal, no government agency will say that the budgetary provision is enough.”

     

  • CJN frowns at rising case of police detention, extortion

    …Orders inspection of detention facilities

     

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen has frowned at the rising cases of unlawful detention, extortion and related acts by security agencies, particularly the police.

    To address the development, the CJN has directed states’ Chief Judges, including that of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to detail Chief Magistrates to henceforth, conduct inspection of police stations or other places of detention, other than prisons.

    The directive, the CJN said, is in line with the provision of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), particularly in Section 34 (1) and (2).

    Onnoghen also directed Chief Judges to set up appropriate mechanisms to ensure compliance with the stated provisions of the ACJA on police brutality and inordinate arrests among others.

    The CJN’s Media Aide, Awassam Bassey said, in a statement on Thursday, that the directive is contained in “a Practice Direction issued on June 20 June, 2018 on the role of magistrates in curbing police brutality under the ACJA.”

    Read Also:Killings: Police boss tasks operatives on Vigilance

    Part of the Practice Direction reads: “I have observed, and received several complaints of the horrific incidents of Police brutality, inordinate arrest, detention and extortion of innocent Nigerians by Officers across the country.

    “These incidents have assumed frightening proportions in recent times. The Magistrate Courts are currently overwhelmed with cases of such brutality, inordinate arrests and detention of Citizens.

    “As we approach election year, it is imperative that we curb these excesses through the instrumentality of the statutory powers of the courts.”

    Also Thursday, Onnoghen advocated increased application of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (ADR) by courts.

    He spoke while commissioning the Court of Appeal’s Mediation Center in Abuja,.

    The CJN said it was now necessary the judiciary to deploy multi-modal justice delivery system to ensure speedy determination of cases.

    He added: “It is hoped that this initiative will see the center grow to become a veritable alternative to the rigours of courts.”

    President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, discribed the Court of Appeal Mediation Centre as first of its kind in the entire West African region.

    Bulkachuwa said: “The Court of Appeal’s Mediation Centre would provide a platform that will encourage disputing parties in reaching an expeditious resolution of their disputes in good faith; and in a fair and efficient manner.

    “The Centre will improve access to justice, user confidence in the court system, lighten the Court’s docket and invariably afford the conventional Court ample time for such matters or issues that are best solved through litigation.

    “This is a giant stride in the right direction as Appellate Courts in countries like America, Canada, Australia, India, Singapore, and Mauritius have already achieved phenomenal successes in that regard.

    “I wish to humbly appeal to members of the Bar to give appellate mediation in this court their maximum cooperation. We must bear in mind that our primary objective as officers in the Temple of justice is to do justice; and that justice delayed is justice denied”.

  • Court says AGF can defend Diezani’s ally’s suit against UK agencies

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Apo, Abuja has said the office of Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) or any lawyer from the office was qualified to defend agencies and officials of the United Kingdom (UK) sued in Nigeria by an ally to ex-Petroleum Minister, Diezani Alison-Madueke.

    Justice Olukayode Adeniyi made the pronouncement while ruling on the objection raised by Benedict Peters (ally to the ex-minister) and three of his companies – Collinwood Limited, Rosewood Investment Limited and Walworth Properties – against the appearance of lawyers from the office of the AGF for the foreign officials and agencies in a suit they filed.

    Peters, Collinwood, Rosewood and Walworth had, on December 29, 2017 filed the suit marked: FCT/HC/CV/0536/17 seeking to set aside three orders given on April 13 and 29, 2016 by the Federal High Court in Abuja and on October 19, 2017 by the Crown Court in Southwark, UK.

    The orders for interim forfeiture prohibited the disposal of the assets in Nigeria and UK in respect of which the orders were made, pending the conclusion of on-going investigations into allegations of money laundering against the ex-minister, on whose behalf investigators believed the plaintiffs acted.

    Read Also:Congress: INEC, APC urge court to reject motion to stop Lagos delegates

    It is the contention by Peters, Collinwood, Rosewood and Walworth that the attached properties belonged to them and not to the ex-Petroleum Minster.

    Mike Ozekhome (SAN), who filed the suit for the plaintiffs, listed the AGF, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), UK; Helen Hughes (an official of CPS), The National Crime Agency (NCA), UK; Stacey Boniface and John Bavister (both investigators for NCA) as defendants.

    At the commencement of hearing in the case, lawyers from the office of the AGF announced appearances for the AGF and the foreign agencies and officials, a development the plaintiffs objected to. They argued that Nigerian government’s lawyers could not represent UK officials and agencies sued in Nigeria.

    In his ruling on June 11 this year, Justice Adeniyi upheld the AGF’s argument that Nigerian government’s lawyers could represent the UK agencies and officials in view of existing legal treaties and agreements between both countries.

    The judge identified the agreements as the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters within the Commonwealth (Enactment and Enforcement Act, No: 13 of 1998 and the Treaty Series No: 18 (1994) otherwise known as the Agreement between Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and North Ireland and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, concerning investigation and prosecution of crime and confiscation of proceed of crime.

    Justice Adeniyi noted that, since the UK officials and agencies had acted based on the mutual legal agreement and treaties in securing the order given by the Crown Court in Southwark in favour of the Nigeria, it was wrong to seek to prevent the AGF and lawyers from his office from relying on the said agreement and treaties to represent the foreign officials and agencies before a Nigerian court.

    The judge said such representation by the either the AGF or lawyers from his office becomes more appropriate when the suit was as a result of the assistance the foreign agencies and officials rendered to the Nigerian government in securing the order for the temporary forfeiture of the properties in London allegedly linked to the ex-Petroleum minister.

    Justice Adeniyi said: “The plaintiff has not established that the representation of the foreign agencies and officials, by the AGF or officials from his office, were not authorised by them (the foreign officials and agencies) and that the representation will prejudice them (the plaintiffs).

    “The instant suit is a fall out of the seizure of properties allegedly acquired by erstwhile Minister of Petroleum, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke. The representation of the AGF or officers from his office is in order.

    “I see no constitutional disability restraining the AGF and any officer from the office from appearing for 3-7th defendants. I fine no merit in this objection. It is overruled and dismissed,” the judge said.

    Justice Adeniyi adjourned to June 22 for the hearing of objection raised against the competence of the suit by the 3-7th defendants and the application by the plaintiffs for interlocutory injunctions.

  • Breaking: Court sentences Dariye to 16 years imprisonment

    …Convicted on charges of criminal breach of trust, criminal misappropriation

     

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Gudu, Abuja has sentenced former Governor of Plateau State, Joshua Chibi Dariye to a cumulative term of imprisonment of 16 years.

    Dariye’s sentence followed his conviction on 15 counts on the offences of criminal breach of trust and criminal misappropriation. The court freed him on eight of the 23 counts contained in the charge on which he was tried.

    Read Also:Court adjourns Dariye ’s alleged N1.162bn fraud trial

    Justice Olubukola Banjoko, in a judgment on Tuesday sentenced Dariye,  a serving All Progressives Congress (APC) Senator, representing Plateau Central, to two years for misappropriation and 14 years for criminal breach of trust.

    According to the judge, the sentences are to run concurrently, implying that Dariye may end up spending 14 years in custody.

    Justice Banjoko, who commended the prosecution for a job well done, said the prevalence of corruption and criminality in the nation’s public space requires drastic measures if we must curb the vices.

     

    Details later…

  • Updated: Court sentences ex-Taraba governor to 28 years imprisonment

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Gudu, Abuja has sentenced former Taraba State Governor, Reverend Jolly Nyame to a cumulative jail term of 28 years, without an option of fine.

    In a judgment on Wednesday, Justice Adebukola Banjoko convicted the ex-governor on 27 out of the 41 counts contained in the charge filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in July 2007.

    The breakdown of the sentence is as follows: 14 years upon conviction for the offence of criminal breach of trust; seven years for receiving gratification; five years for obtaining valuable public properties without consideration, and two years for criminal misappropriation.

    The judge said the sentences would run concurrently, implying that the ex-governor may end up spending 14 years in prison.

    Justice Banjoko, who said the defendant betrayed his claim to be a clergyman and Reverend, wondered why it was only the ex-governor that was prosecuted in view of the level of impunity displayed, while Nyame was in office.

    The judge, in the over 300-page judgment, which she read for over six hours, said after carefully examining all the evidence tendered by the prosecution, she was left with no option than to conclude that it was “either Nyame entered into office without a corrupt mind, but later became corrupt or he was corrupt ab-initio.”

    The judge said: “There was such a crazy level of corruption in the air in Taraba State Ministry of Finance. It is however amazing that none of the officials were arraigned. ”

    She said the evidence before the court showed that while officials that served under the defendant were returning their loot to the EFCC after they were questioned, Nyame “was still busy committing more crime”.

    The judge noted that one of such crimes included the N100m the defendant withdrew from the state coffers ostensibly to host former President Olusegun Obasanjo, who paid a one-day visit to Taraba State in 2007.

    Justice Banjoko said there was a nexus between Nyame and the fictitious N250m contract that was awarded for the bulk purchase of stationery and office equipment.

    The judge noted that Nyame had through his then Commissioner of Finance, Alhaji Abubakar Tutare, approved a memo for that contract which was awarded to a firm, Saman Global Ventures, on January 1, 2005, sidelining key officials of the Ministry of Finance in the process.

    She said: “The defendant gave that memo life by giving his approval”, the court held, noting that N180m was subsequently diverted from the conctract sum and handed to the ex-governor.”

    The judge, though noted that the evidence against the ex-governor in respect of the transaction was “circumstantial,” because no other document had his signature except the memo, she said the manner funds were approved and released from the Taraba State treasury, showed that the defendant acted in breach of his oath of office.

    “It is disheartening to note that between 2004 to 2005, the Ministry of Finance in Taraba State was specially an enclave; it was a den of criminal activities, best illustrated with Ali Baba and the 40 thieves.

    “The court finds the defendant guilty as charged. The clear purpose of the money was diversion.  There was no evidence of purchase of the stationary”, Justice Banjoko held.

    Besides, the Judge held that Nyame repeatedly approved release of funds to the firm despite being aware that it neither purchased the stationery nor executed any contract.

    She said there was no evidence that Nyame, who had within five weeks, moved over N345m from the Taraba State coffers for purchase of stationery, made any attempt to prosecute the firm or to set up a panel of inquiry, when the fraud was brought to his attention.

    The judge said the defendant “dishonestly” diverted public funds through the Taraba State liaison office, on the guise that it was used for the purchase of rice that was shared to his supporters.

    “The progenitor of this impunity was no one else than the defendant himself. The defendant cannot feign ignorance of this colossal fraud.

    “He who approves must be accountable to what he approved. The defendant had the dominion over the state fund and only he could say open-sesame to the vault of Taraba State.

    “The defendant cannot escape responsibility or cling to the thin plank of mere approval, “the jude said.

    Justice Banjoko added that the defendant committed “criminal breach of trust beyond reasonable doubt,” by approving N111m to host guests when the Mambilla Power Project was commissioned.

    The judge, while finding Nyame guilty of receiving gratification to the tune of N80m, said she was amazed that the defendant, in an effort to defend the charge, “provided the entire arsenal for the prosecution.”

    She noted Nyame was also very inconsistent, particularly as it relates to issues surrounding the presidential visit and security votes.

    The judge rejected the prayer by the defence for an option of fine.

    Justice Banjoko said she rejected Nyame’s plea for leniency because of the overwhelming evidence and facts of the case.

    The judge added: “The citizens of Taraba had elected the defendant, a clergyman, in three separate occasions to govern them, which shows constant level of trust.

    “The expectation must have been so high. As a Reverend, he must have been seen as an epitome of morality, piety and everything good.

    “How will Reverend Nyame begin to explain to people of Taraba State his actions and inactions? How can he justify causing such a colossal loss to the state?”

    Justice Banjoko said Nyame comitted “catalogue of crimes” a month before he vacated office, “while under intense searchlight from security agencies.”

    She said the court would be failing in its responsibility “if it fails to impose the full sanction”.

    The judge, who noted that the defendant “behaved like a common thief with unbridled greed”, said the sentence passed on him would serve as a deterrent to other public office holders.

    The court directed EFCC to return all the funds it recovered in the process of its investigation into the case to the coffers of Taraba State.

    The judgment came about 11 years after Nyame, who served as Governor between May 29, 1999, to May 29, 2007, was first arraigned on the 41-count charge in which he was accused of looting the state’s funds to the tune of N1.64billion.

    Earlier before the court sat, indication that a major development was in the offing was evident in the number of armed security that took charge of security within and around the hitherto quiet court premises.

    After being subjected to a session of search at the court’s main entrance, visitors were again frisked before allowed entry into the courtroom.

    Dressed in a dark brown kaftan with a cap to match, Nyame entered the courtroom at about 9.02am.

    Read Also:N1.64bn fraud suit: Nyame to know fate on May 30

    Justice Banjoko came into the courtroom around 9.40am. She first attended a case before directing that the case involving Nyame be called. It was around 9.46am.

    When the case was called, Nyame, who sat on the second-to-the-last row on the right  side of the courtroom, walked to the dock located on the left hand side of the courtroom, a few distance from where the judge sat.

    The judge began reading the judgment at about 9.51am, with Nyame seated calmly in the dock.

    At a point when the judge announced the conviction of the defendant, Nyame, who had all along lowered his head, raised it and looked towards the judge.

    There also a sudden murmuring by the court’s audience, among who were the defendant’s associates, supporters and friends.

    After convicting the defendant, Justice Banjoko stood down the case for some time, but returned later to pronounce the sentence.

    Immediately the judge rose after pronouncing the sentence, Nyame, who was still sitting in the dock, was surrounded by armed security personnel.

    By 4pm, the security personnel and prison officials were seen still awaiting the completion of the necessary documents before he could be taken the ex-governor, who looked troubled, to prison.

    The EFCC had charged Nyame with 41 counts of criminal breach of trust, criminal misappropriation, taking gratification and obtaining valuable thing without consideration.

    The prosecution’s case against the ex-governor relates mainly to the allegation of his diversion of N1.64bn of Taraba State’s funds while he was governor.

    In the course of trial, the prosecution led by Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), called 14 witnesses and closed its case on November 22, 2016.

    Nyame called four witnesses in his defence, including himself.

    Meanwhile, the judge is expected to deliver judgment on June 12 this year, in the trial of former Plateau State Governor, Joshua Dariye (now a serving Senator).

    Dariye is facing a 21-count charge bordering on money laundering and diversion of Ecological Fund to the tune of N1.162 billion.

  • Engage in agriculture, FCT FADAMA coordinator urges youths

    Mr Usman Adangara, the Federal Capital Territory ( FCT ), Fadama Development Project coordinator, has called on the youth to engage in farming so as to support the government’s efforts towards economic development.

    Adangara made the call in an interview with the newsmen in Gwagwalada, FCT on Saturday.

    He said farming is a rewarding and lucrative profession; that is why the youth should be encouraged to engage in crop growing.

    “Farming is also a source of livelihood for many people in this country and should be given adequate attention for economic development.

    “Agriculture contributes to national revenue, food production, employment opportunity, foreign exchange and food security.

    Read Also: FCTA trains staff in computer basics

    “I urge the youths in this country to embrace farming so that they can be self -employed and reliant,” he said.

    He also advised youths to key into livestock farming describing it as an important area of agriculture critical to the nation’s economic development.

    The coordinator called on the Federal Government to provide soft loans to farmers to enhance agricultural production in the country.

    The coordinator said the Fadama project was committed to boosting agricultural activities through training, technical assistance, addition financing and support for farmers across the FCT.

    Adangara added that the project also aims to increase income for farmers, agro-processors, create better forum for conflict resolution and crisis management which are conditions for peaceful coexistence.

    NAN