Tag: funds

  • ASCSN to govt: Protect pension funds

    ASCSN to govt: Protect pension funds

    The Association of Senior Civil Servants of Nigeria (ASCSN) has urged the Federal Government to offer ‘adequate protection’ to the N5.3 trillion workers contributory pension funds.

    Its President, Comrade Bobboi Bala Kaigama said the fund is  workers’ money meant to offset their terminal benefits when they retire.

    He said: “We are worried and disturbed that government functionaries are now making persistent efforts to lay their hands on the contributory pension funds in the name of funding infrastructure.

    “We say capital ‘NO’ to this retrogressive move. Our officials need to understand that the pension funds are not idle funds, but are funds invested mainly in safe instruments like money and bonds markets. We make bold to say that our country is not yet ripe for utilising pension funds for building infrastructure.

    “Our federal, states and local governments are corrupt and incompetent in recovering public funds. We, therefore, strongly advise government to look elsewhere to raise funds for their projects. Contributory pension fund is a no go area and workers and their unions are more than prepared to fight with everything they have to resist pressures to touch and toy with workers future.”

    He called for stiffer sanctions for those who looted pension funds, saying that this would act as deterrent to others.

    He appealed to the federal and state governments to ensure that pensioners were paid their gratuities and monthly stipends promptly.

  • Should pension funds be used to bridge housing gap?

    Should pension funds be used to bridge housing gap?

    As at last March, pension fund stood at N5.9 trillion, provoking calls for its investment in housing. About N59 trillion is required to bridge the 17 million housing gap. But, should the accumulated pension fund be so used? Stakeholders are divided over the issue, reports  MUYIWA LUCAS.

    Stakeholders in the housing and pension sectors are divided over the propriety of the deployment of the huge pension funds to close the housing gap in the country.

    The National Pension Commission (PenCom) Director-General, Mrs. Chinelo Anohu-Amazu, said the 2014 Pension Reform Act, as reviewed, provided opportunities for increased investment of pension funds in infrastructure and housing development. The act, according to him, also allowed for a percentage of contributing workers’ Retirement Savings Accounts (RSA) balance to be used as equity contribution for mortgage.

    Represented by Mr. Ibrahim Kangiwa, at a Mandatory Continuous Professional Development Programme of the Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuers, Lagos State Branch, the DG, however, noted that investment of the fund in housing was limited by the cumbersome nature of housing investment.

    Presenting a paper titled: An overview of the Pension Reform Act 2014 and the provision for investment outlets in real estate sector, Mrs Anohu-Amazu said as at last May, the total value of pension fund assets under the management of the licensed pension operators stood at N5.6 trillion.

    The DG explained that there was an effort by PenCom to increase pension investment in infrastructure and housing, and consequently urged stakeholders in pension administration to utilise the provisions of the Act for the provision of more infrastructure and real estate development in the country.

    She explained that the new Pension Reform Act (PRA 2014), has made provisions for states and local governments to embark on pension fund investments in the housing sub-sector, a sharp contrast from the 2004 Act, which only included the Federal Government service. Pension contribution rate has since increased from 7.5 per cent for the employers and 7.5 per cent for employees to 10 per cent employers and eight per cent employees respectively.

    Though she said the pension fund may not be used for real estate investment, Mrs Ahonu-Amazu expressed the readiness of PenCom to support mortgage financing as this will create more jobs, urging stakeholders in the real estate sector to device means of ensuring massive investments in housing provision, since the Act made provisions for increased investments in infrastructure and housing development.

    “Direct investment is currently not allowed due to liquidity and valuation issues. Traditionally, real estate is complex; when you need to get your fund out, real estate may not be easily disposable,” she said.

    The Association of Estate Agents in Nigeria Chairman, Mr. Chudi Ubosi, in his presentation, titled: ‘Investment of pension Fund and idle funds in housing development: The estate surveyor and valuer’s perspectives’’, argued that with about 17 million housing deficit, and the demand for housing put at 10:1 for demands and supply, about N59 trillion would be required to bridge the gap in housing. He said the sector contributes about 1.3 per cent to the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    Ubosi regretted that housing is still low,  saying that Lagos State, which has been described as the most vibrant property market in the country, still has home ownership at less than 20 per cent, and about 1, 500 net settlers daily in the state. He argued that all limiting laws and regulations preventing deployment of pension funds as well as direct investments in housing infrastructure be repealed without further delay.

    “Nigeria is one of the few countries in the world with no mortgage. Funds may just be in the banks; there is the need to create financial products and mortgage backed securities,” he said, adding that the investment in housing should also focus on the lower end of the housing pyramid, while regulations should be amended to allow the PFAs put money in the Fund to enable them invest in housing.

    However, the Managing Director, Stanbic IBTC Pension Managers Limited, Mr. Eric Fajemisin, disagreed with Ubosi, stressing that pension funds have not been idle.   The majority of the funds, according to him, are being used for infrastructural development in the country.

    Fajemisin, who spoke on: “Challenges and benefits for investment of pension fund in housing development in Nigeria and global approach, said one of the challenges in pension administration is that of about 180 million Nigerians, only a meagre seven million, representing four per cent, as at last March, are registered in the scheme.

    The Stanbic IBTC Pension managers chief stressed that if Nigerians participate in the mortgage sector, it could contribute between 30 and 70 per cent to the nations’ GDP, reduce poverty and improve standard of living in the country.

    He said the Federal Mortgage Bank (FMB) estimated that about N56 trillion would needed to meet the shortfall in Nigerian housing need, but the sources of housing finance are not adequately equipped to fund the supply deficits.

    “The housing sector is supported by favourable demographics, but fraught with a huge supply deficit and ineffective demand. It can play a special role in the economic dialogue in Nigeria as it generates employment, increases productivity, raises standard of living and alleviates poverty,” he said.

    NIESV, Lagos branch Chairman, Mr. Offiong Ukpong, said the pension fund, if well utilised, could solve the country’s housing needs and be a secured investment for the future. “If N20, 000 can buy a transistor radio for a worker now and instead of buying it, he decides to invest that money into pension fund, by the time he would be exiting the fund in 30 years, would that same money buy him the same appliance or furniture? Obviously not,’’ he argued.

    The chairman of the occasion and a former president of the institution, Mr. Yinka Sonaike, said housing has been a recurring decimal in the country and that efforts should be geared towards reducing its deficit.

  • Should pension funds be used to bridge housing gap?

    Should pension funds be used to bridge housing gap?

    The pension fund stood at N5.9 trillion last March, provoking calls for its investment in housing. About N59 trillion is required to bridge the 17 million housing gap. But, should the accumulated pension fund be so used? Stakeholders are divided over the issue, reports  MUYIWA LUCAS.

    Stakeholders in the housing and pension sectors are divided over the propriety of the deployment of the huge pension funds to close the housing gap in the country.

    The National Pension Commission (PenCom) Director-General, Mrs. Chinelo Anohu-Amazu, said the 2014 Pension Reform Act, as reviewed, provided opportunities for increased investment of pension funds in infrastructure and housing development. The act, according to him, also allowed for a percentage of contributing workers’ Retirement Savings Accounts (RSA) balance to be used as equity contribution for mortgage.

    Represented by Mr. Ibrahim Kangiwa, at a Mandatory Continuous Professional Development Programme of the Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuers, Lagos State Branch, the DG, however, noted that investment of the fund in housing was limited by the cumbersome nature of housing investment.

    Presenting a paper titled: An overview of the Pension Reform Act 2014 and the provision for investment outlets in real estate sector, Mrs Anohu-Amazu said as at last May, the total value of pension fund assets under the management of the licensed pension operators stood at N5.6 trillion.

    The DG explained that there was an effort by PenCom to increase pension investment in infrastructure and housing, and consequently urged stakeholders in pension administration to utilise the provisions of the Act for the provision of more infrastructure and real estate development in the country.

    She explained that the new Pension Reform Act (PRA 2014), has made provisions for states and local governments to embark on pension fund investments in the housing sub-sector, a sharp contrast from the 2004 Act, which only included the Federal Government service. Pension contribution rate has since increased from 7.5 per cent for the employers and 7.5 per cent for employees to 10 per cent employers and eight per cent employees respectively.

    Though she said the pension fund may not be used for real estate investment, Mrs Ahonu-Amazu expressed the readiness of PenCom to support mortgage financing as this will create more jobs, urging stakeholders in the real estate sector to device means of ensuring massive investments in housing provision, since the Act made provisions for increased investments in infrastructure and housing development.

    “Direct investment is currently not allowed due to liquidity and valuation issues. Traditionally, real estate is complex; when you need to get your fund out, real estate may not be easily disposable,” she said.

    The Association of Estate Agents in Nigeria Chairman, Mr. Chudi Ubosi, in his presentation, titled: ‘Investment of pension Fund and idle funds in housing development: The estate surveyor and valuer’s perspectives’’, argued that with about 17 million housing deficit, and the demand for housing put at 10:1 for demands and supply, about N59 trillion would be required to bridge the gap in housing. He said the sector contributes about 1.3 per cent to the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    Ubosi regretted that housing is still low,  saying that Lagos State, which has been described as the most vibrant property market in the country, still has home ownership at less than 20 per cent, and about 1, 500 net settlers daily in the state. He argued that all limiting laws and regulations preventing deployment of pension funds as well as direct investments in housing infrastructure be repealed without further delay.

    “Nigeria is one of the few countries in the world with no mortgage. Funds may just be in the banks; there is the need to create financial products and mortgage backed securities,” he said, adding that the investment in housing should also focus on the lower end of the housing pyramid, while regulations should be amended to allow the PFAs put money in the Fund to enable them invest in housing.

    However, the Managing Director, Stanbic IBTC Pension Managers Limited, Mr. Eric Fajemisin, disagreed with Ubosi, stressing that pension funds have not been idle.   The majority of the funds, according to him, are being used for infrastructural development in the country.

    Fajemisin, who spoke on: “Challenges and benefits for investment of pension fund in housing development in Nigeria and global approach, said one of the challenges in pension administration is that of about 180 million Nigerians, only a meagre seven million, representing four per cent, as at last March, are registered in the scheme.

    The Stanbic IBTC Pension managers chief stressed that if Nigerians participate in the mortgage sector, it could contribute between 30 and 70 per cent to the nations’ GDP, reduce poverty and improve standard of living in the country.

    He said the Federal Mortgage Bank (FMB) estimated that about N56 trillion would needed to meet the shortfall in Nigerian housing need, but the sources of housing finance are not adequately equipped to fund the supply deficits.

    “The housing sector is supported by favourable demographics, but fraught with a huge supply deficit and ineffective demand. It can play a special role in the economic dialogue in Nigeria as it generates employment, increases productivity, raises standard of living and alleviates poverty,” he said.

    NIESV, Lagos branch Chairman, Mr. Offiong Ukpong, said the pension fund, if well utilised, could solve the country’s housing needs and be a secured investment for the future. “If N20, 000 can buy a transistor radio for a worker now and instead of buying it, he decides to invest that money into pension fund, by the time he would be exiting the fund in 30 years, would that same money buy him the same appliance or furniture? Obviously not,’’ he argued.

    The chairman of the occasion and a former president of the institution, Mr. Yinka Sonaike, said housing has been a recurring decimal in the country and that efforts should be geared towards reducing its deficit.

  • Senate Committee charges FRC on intervention funds

    The Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRC) has been charged to investigate how banks utilise intervention funds

    This challenge was posed by the Senate committee on Trade and Investment during an oversight visit to the Council in Lagos at the weekend.

    The Chairman of the committee, Senator Fatimat Raji Rasaki, charged the FRC to go after the banks handling intervention funds to ensure that they give proper accounts.

    Unimpressed with how some of the intervention funds meant for dedicated sectors are being used, Rasaki said the FRC by its position as the body which receive financial reports of banks, should use its expertise to curb abuse of the funds.

    While commending the body for its work on maintaining of accounting and other financial standards, the committee chairman called for increased funding of the FRC to ensure adequate performance of its role without compromising standards.

    Briefing members of the committee, the Executive Secretary of the FRC, Mr Jim Obazee, said work has already advanced in the production of a new uniform code of corporate governance for the country.

    He, however, noted that work has been slowed down by legal challenges by some stakeholders, while projecting that the code would be functional by the third quarter of the year.

    He said the code would correct lapses such as insiders dominated boards, non-independent corporate boards of companies, absence of minority voices on boards, inadequate board monitoring and supervision of the executive as well as compromisable and ineffective audit function and committees.

  • Ex-UI VC urges Fed Govt to include research funds in budget

    A former  Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ibadan (UI), Prof Olufemi Bamiro, has urged the Federal Government  to make provisions for research funds in appropriation bills.

    His position was shared by a university don Prof Layi Fagbenle  at the book lunch to celebrate the 81st birthday of Prof Babajide Lucas.

    The book was entitled: “Renewable Natural Resoruces Engineering: Essays in honour of Canon Prof Babajide Lucas”.

    Bamiro said:  “This is a country that has depended so much on oil,  which has become traditional energy, but surely we can see now the way the world is going, everybody is looking towards renewable energy. We have to look into the direction of solar energy supply. In Nigeria, we still need to be serious in our energy drive because the world  is moving away from oil and gas to the renewable and the non- renewable, which must be utilised.”

    Fagbenle  said: “ When nations are focused on research result, they will get developed and many problems will be solved. I know what my student go through before they can be able to finish their research work due to funding.”

    The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ibadan, Prof Idowu Olayinka, who was represented by the Deputy VC Administration, Prof Emilolorun Ayilari, described Lucas as a disciplinarian and educationist.

  • Fed Govt advised to channel recovered funds into agric

    The Federal Government has been urged to channel recovered funds into agriculture to achieve food security as well as increase the sector’s contribution to the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP).

    Founder, Uplifting Women through Farming (UWTF), an agro-based not-for-profit organisation, Mrs Afoma Adigwe, said channelling the recovered funds into agriculture would benefit Nigerians. She warned that food security should not treated with levity.

    The agriculturist, who participated in THAIFEX – World of Food Festival in Thailand, told our reporter that Nigeria is lagging behind in food security.

    She said directing the looted funds into agriculture would enable farmers to feed the nation.

    “We have lands in the country; we have what it takes to feed the nation, but farmers need support from government. We have what it takes to grow enough rice for the entire nation and even for export. Investors in Thailand are willing to come and invest in our agricultural sector in Nigeria, but we need government support to grow the sector,” she said.

    She urged the Federal Government to channel the recovered looted to the agric sector through Agriculture banks, Microfinance banks and agriculture-based co-operative societies.

  • On more bailout funds for the insolvent states

    The federal government has announced that it is giving the financially insolvent states fresh bailout loans of N90 billion. It will be the third time in less than a year that the Buhari APC federal government has been constrained, against its better judgment, to come to the rescue of these 27 insolvent states with huge bail- out funds. As expected, the two previous financial bailouts did not solve the deep-seated financial problems of the states. The funds were merely used by the insolvent states to clear up part of their outstanding salary arrears. After that, new arrears of salary piled up with the affected states not being able to do anything about it. What they currently receive monthly from the federation accounts is not enough to meet their current basic monthly wage bill. And, predictably, they have not been able to generate new funds internally to fill this gap in their revenue.

    But after receiving billions of naira in previous bailouts, the report of a federal financial investigation team into the disbursement of the federal bailout funds showed that many of the governors of the insolvent states simply diverted the bailout funds to personal and other non productive purposes. The question now arises whether these federal financial bailouts provide a final solution to the worsening financial plight of the insolvent states. In other words should the federal government continue to bail out these insolvent states? Is this financially sustainable?

    I do not think so. Even if these bailouts are sustainable, it is a negation of the federal system of government for the federal government to continue to hand the state governments financial bailouts. It is tantamount to rewarding incompetent and corrupt state governments. Except in emergency situations the federal government is not under any constitutional obligation to give the states financial handouts. It derogates from the financial autonomy of the states which demands that, in a truly federal system of government, the states should generate the financial resources required by them to run their respective governments. If they are not able to do so, then they are obviously not financially viable and should be scrapped. Handing them bailouts, which have to be repaid, is an intolerable financial burden on our country and tax payers.

    These insolvent states were created during the long period of military rule in Nigeria without any thought being given to their financial viability. After independence in 1960, only the then Mid-West region was created constitutionally from the then Western Region during the Balewa civilian federal government. And this was made possible only by the 1962 internal crisis in the AG, the ruling party in the Western Region. The creation later of so many new states was a major political blunder of military rule in our country. It made military rule popular, but it did not fully consider the economic implications involved in the creation of such a large number of new states. The creation of these states was certainly politically motivated. In May, 1967, General Gowon first divided the country into 12 states. This was after Ironsi’s Unification Decree 34 of May 24, 1966, that purportedly dissolved the existing four regions into provincial administrations. The decree was unpopular in the country and led to the military ouster of Ironsi from power.  Gowon’s purpose in creating the 12 new states was to undermine Ojukwu’s bid for the secession of the so-called Biafra from Nigeria, and to legitimise his military government. The decision was popular with the ethnic minorities in the old Eastern Region that had been agitating for years for a separate state of their own; in much the same way as the minorities in the old Western Region had also been demanding the creation of a separate Mid-West state from the old Western Region. Since then, under military rule, the number of new states has increased to 36 now. The surge in oil revenues masked the fact that, without the oil revenues, most of these new states were not financially viable. With so many unviable states the centre became stronger and more financially dominant. What now pass as states were, in fact, administrative provinces inherited during colonial rule. This was why our federal system of government at independence was based on only three regions, not the multiplicity of states that we now have. The departing colonial power had refused to create new states.

    In their defence of financial bail outs, the states argue that it is the fall in their share of revenue from the federation account that is responsible for the financial mess in which they now find themselves. But the source of their financial plight goes beyond that. The truth of the matter is that they have just been as financially profligate and reckless as the federal governments we have had to put up with for a long time. Many of the state governors are under investigation by the EFCC for massive corruption. Examples of these corrupt and convicted state governors include Ibori of Delta and Alam of Bayelsa. If the state governors are thoroughly investigated as they should be, I have absolutely no doubt that the findings of such investigations will be just as shocking as the current revelations regarding the vast scale of corruption under the Jonathan PDP federal government.

    My second reason for objecting to the indefinite bail out of the states is that the federal government itself is, as we have seen, in an equally deplorable and shocking financial situation. It is desperately short of funds too and is having to put on hold many critical infrastructure capital projects. It is currently running a huge deficit budget of roughly 50 per cent and is hoping to borrow half of this year’s budget from external sources. But external lenders generally refrain from lending for budgetary support, as is the case now in our country. So, from where will the federal government get the bailout funds for the financially ailing states? The answer is that it will have to resort to more borrowing from the CBN. In other words, new money will be created to fund these insolvent states. This will have the predictable effect of crowding out borrowing by the private sector, and of undermining stability in our macro economy. Our domestic debt, already bigger than our external debt, will increase further.

    The media reported further that the federal government intends to impose some stringent financial conditions on the states being bailed out. But these conditions will not work and will not deter the governors of the states concerned from continuing with their financial profligacy in the belief that they will be bailed out again by the federal government. At that point it will be difficult for the federal government to cut them off from the bailout funds on which they will have become utterly dependent. One of the arguments advanced by the military in support of the creation of new states was that it would spread economic development in the new states to the grass roots. But that has not proved to be the case. Apart from such symbolic projects as flyovers in the states capitals, new official residence for the governors, new states assemblies, a few model colleges, and sub-standard state universities, the poor in the states cannot be said to have really benefitted from the creation of states, where the political elite continue, with unabated vigour, to cream off revenues accruing to the states. The real beneficiaries of the financial bailouts are the rich, not the poor. In fact, the poor are worse off now than ever before. We are a poor country and we cannot expect to build a prosperous economy on handouts to insurgents and militants, or on subsidies and bailouts to insolvent states. A few years ago hefty financial bailouts were given to the commercial banks. Are they healthier or more efficient now? Many of them are already in distress.

    The long term solution to this lingering financial mess in the states is to device the constitutional means of reducing the number of states to not more than 12. It is even better to collapse them into six regions. This is what the call for the restructuring of Nigeria’s federalism should be about. It is far easier and more economical to manage six or twelve states than the existing 36 with all the paraphernalia of pseudo governments that cannot inherently carry out their basic financial obligations. Obviously, this will be politically difficult. The only alternative is for the federal government’s share of the national revenue to be reduced and distributed among the states. But while the existing 50 per cent share of the federal government in the national revenue is too large, due care should be taken in this regard. We cannot afford to have a weak federal government that is placed in such an invidious financial situation that it cannot carry out its basic responsibilities to the nation in defence, national security, and external affairs, Already the corporate existence of our country is being threatened by several centrifugal forces. We need a strong federal government and institutions to hold our fragile country together.

  • ‘Unemployment, job losses depleting pension funds’

    ‘Unemployment, job losses depleting pension funds’

    The Federal Government is eyeing the N5.4 trillion pension funds to develop infrastructure. But the fund is dwindling because of unemployment and joblessness, according to Usman Suleiman, Future Unity Glanvills Pensions Limited (FUG Pensions) Managing Director. The number of Contributors to the Retirement  Savings Account (RSA) has reduced because of retrenchment, he notes. He tells Omobola Tolu-Kusimo that there has to be a template to take care of long term investment, safety and returns on investment (RoI) if pension funds must be used for infrastructure development.

    How would you assess the economy against the backdrop of the challenges?

    A major issue still standing as an obstacle to the overall recommencement of economic activities is the issue of power generation consequent upon lack of gas. This is because a significant number of our power generation infrastructure is based on the thermal system, which is powered by gas. The existing hydro power station cannot generate enough power to significantly improve supply to the national grid. Unfortunately, we do not have other alternative sources of power generation such as coal, which we have in abundance in this country. There should have been power plants based on coal in Enugu, Kogi and Gombe States.

    Of course, we know that Ashaka Cement is building a small power plant in Gombe based on coal, but there should have been a major plant based on coal. The construction of Mambilla power plant, which is planned to be a huge plant that will generate over 3000 megawatts should have taken off. The whole of the Sahelian region-Sokoto, Jigawa and Borno, should have had solar power plants located severally. If this had happened, we will not be so much tied to thermal plants. As it is presently, all the major plants including the biggest one, the Egbin thermal plant based in Ikorodu, Lagos, are based on gas. With what is happening now in the Niger Delta, where the gas is sourced from and along the routes where the pipes pass, it becomes a very challenging situation. The issue of vandalism of gas pipelines will have to be addressed and clearly, it is not just an issue of vandalism, it has so many sore factors both political and economic. This is a major obstacle to the forward movement of the economy. For us in FUG, we continue to maintain our optimism and sustain the expectation that we will be able to achieve our medium term goals, substantially, in the second quarter of this year.

    So far,  since we commenced business, particularly in the second quarter, we have been  able to recover part of what we were not able to fully achieve last year.

    Many organisations have closed shops. some in operation have scaled down. How have these affected pension funds administration?

    It affected our business in two ways. The first has to do with when you have a depreciation in the wealth of employment generation, it automatically affects our business in terms of the new accounts that we generate. Secondly, it affects our business in terms of having to service the employees, who are now out of job and would require to sustain themselves. The law has provided that in the event of job loss and inability to get another job for a period of four months and above, an account holder can apply to access 25 per cent of the balance of their pension account. This is an amount that would have remained in their account being invested and growing. But, because of the circumstances of being laid off, the owner of the account will come and withdraw 25 per cent of it for consumption, meaning that it will go off and it is the 75 per cent remaining that will be invested and no new inflow will come in until that retrenched employee gets another job and starts contributing again.

    If the employee fails to get another job and he is 50 years, he will then come back as a retiree to fully access that account by taking lump sum and receiving pension, which he would not have done if he was employed. So, these are the two parts in which our business is affected. It is the reality, as I stated, it is a situation that I can see improving from the third quarter of this year. We anticipate that as these companies start investing again, a lot of those in the labour market will actually be called back to employment. And the government itself is targeting employment generation as one of its core objectives with agriculture in particular and private sector employment generation as the other. For us, generating employment in all sectors is good for our business.

    The Federal Government wants to use pension funds to bridge infrastructure gaps, what are the issues?

    First of all, let me state that it is not an issue of accessing the money. The government has been accessing the money with 70 per cent of the money invested in Federal and state government bonds. When we say 70 per cent, it means that 70 per cent of N5.4 trillion is in bonds and those bonds could fund anything. But, what we are talking about here is funding capital projects and the question is: How are you going to do it? PFAs are not project managers. We don’t have the capacity of phasing, packaging and funding projects. The capacity that we have is to manage and invest the funds for long term with safety and return as our goal. We are, therefore, available and ready to fund projects that meets these reqirements. The requirements are of safety and reasonable return.  But, how do you generate those projects? It is the parties that want to implement those projects that have the responsibility of packaging the projects to meet the requirement that will enable pension funds go into the funding of those projects. What we have been saying is let project promoters, either government institutions, private sector, multilateral agencies or development finance institutions create vehicles for generating, developing and presenting the projects to us. Once these projects meet our requirements, they meet the international best practices, which are known to everybody, the funds will definitely go into funding of the projects because that’s what we want. The government could make those bonds specific by floating a bond for funding a particular bridge such as the second Niger Bridge, proposed bridge in Nasarawa across the Benue River or package a bond specifically for funding the East/West rail line. The project promoters and managers will then develop and package the projects for financing. In the absence of such projects, there is a little we can do other than to invest in whatever available classes of assets are there.

    With the situation of the economy, how confident are you in investing pension funds in the capital market?

    Pension funds will always be invested in the capital market, but the significance will depend on the strategies of the particular investment manager. Not all PFAs will have same exposure every time in the capital market. However, at present, the average is just about eight per cent exposure of the funds under management in the capital market. But you can be sure that investment managers in the PFAs are watching the market on a regular basis and carrying out analyses. We anticipate that with the deregulation of the exchange regime and deregulation of petroleum downstream, foreign portfolio investors, who play a significant role in making the markets, will start coming back. And when they come back, initially, there might be profit taking and so on and so forth, but we anticipate that the market will start looking upwards and then investing managers in PFAs will start taking positions. So, but even at present, we have pension funds in the capital market.

    How did your firm fare last year? What is its present position?

    Last year was generally a difficult one for the economy as a whole for obvious reason. The year 2015 was an election year and there was a lot of apprehension in the country in terms of the political direction and the future. There was a lot of fear about crisis arising from election, particularly when the election dates were shifted to over a period of some weeks. However, as it turned out, the elections were concluded successfully. The country avoided crisis and the new administration took off at the end of May. This doused a lot of tension and therefore, made a lot of investors and the public to realise that we could in fact, have confidence in the future. Investors and the public then positioned to look and understand the focus of the new administration. But it took a little bit of time for the administration to fully settle, get the cabinet running and come up with concise and clear policy directions. This took almost the end of the year and for that reason, the economy became very slow. For us in the pension industry, this naturally affected our performance in terms of growth and registration.

    Specifically, how was your sector affected?

    We are in the contributory pension scheme, effectively meaning that unlike the defined benefit, it is totally and completely dependent on employment generation and employees opening Retirement Savings Accoumt (RSAs).  As a consequence of slowing down of economic activities and the waiting stance of investing public, there was a lull in employment generation over that period, not only in the private sector, which is supposed to be the major employer, but in the public sector, including both Federal and states.

    For this reason, there wasn’t very significant growth in the number of employees registered into the system. However, in spite of this circumstance, we in FUG have been able to weather that storm and move into 2016 with the confidence of being able to move towards achieving our projections for the medium term strategy plan. At the beginning of the first quarter of this year, semblance of direction was being identified, particularly in relations to policies that have to do with exchange rate and petroleum pricing.

    In the second quarter, even though there is no clear cut policy statement, it is clear that the exchange rate regime is now liberalised. Therefore, investors clearly now have a direction. They can anticipate and forecast unlike in the latter part of last year. With that, we expect that in the second half of this year which are the third and fourth quarters of the year, we will see a rejuvenation of activities in the economy. We anticipate that investors now see that bringing in their funds to invest, they have a window where the liberalised exchange regime of being able to repatriate their capital and profit.

    We, therefore, anticipate that companies that have been waiting for investment and therefore, regeneration of activities will now be able to attract partners, who will come in with investment. We also expect that portfolio investors will also stage a comeback into the capital market in the third quarter of the year. We anticipate that petroleum marketers will now be ready to truly recommence importation of fuel particularly petrol and aviation fuel because they can now sell at a reasonable price. Although we are told that it will not go beyond N145, but effectively, with the pricing regime we are looking at, they have an avenue of manipulating both the import cost, transportation and their own margin. So, we anticipate less pressure in that effect.

    What is the total asset under your management?

    As at present, I will say we have total asset  of about N44 billion out of which RSA fund is N39 billion. We are looking at achieving N50 billion assets under management by the end of this year. We have recorded about N44 billion now.

  • NLNG disowns link to looted funds recovery

    NLNG disowns link to looted funds recovery

    Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Limited (NLNG) said its attention has denounced  the alleged link with the reported N115 billion loot published in the media, saying it was in bad taste to taint its image.

    According to its General Manager, External Relations Division, Kudo Eresia-Eke, the said media report titled: “N115 billion loot: Ex Air chiefs, politicians top refund list”, was said to have quoted an unnamed public official,  that “$3.1 billion was intercepted in the accounts of NNPC and NLNG and was yet to be moved to the Central Bank of Nigeria in line with the Transaction Single Account (TSA) policy”, defied the ethics of the profession..

    He said: “NLNG views this statement with utmost seriousness and wishes to denounce it as misleading and untrue.

    “To our knowledge, no NLNG’s accounts are the subject of any recovery effort by the EFCC or any other similar authority, more especially as NLNG is a private company and not a government agency or parastatal.

    “We are surprised that these misleading reports continue to be rehashed despite categorical statements by ourselves and third parties, including the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) to the effect that NLNG has no outstanding obligations to government.

    “We wish to use this medium to appeal to all concerned stakeholders to take the necessary care of checking the accuracy of information before publication.”

  • Concern over airlines’ trapped funds

    The effects of unstable crude oil prices have hit the airline industry as many carriers are reworking their operations.

    The reworking by some of the affected carriers, is predicated on their inability to repatriate revenue accruing from ticket sales because of new policies designed to protect foreign reserves.

    According to the International Air Transport Association (IATA), this trend has occasioned global concerns on the future of air transportation in the affected countries.

    At the IATA meeting in Dublin, aviation players expressed worry over the effects of trapped funds to global carriers.

    Investigations revealed that foreign airlines’ trapped funds in Nigeria have risen to $591million.

    The clearing house for over 250 airlines also listed other countries where airlines are having difficulties repatriating their funds.

    The countries include Venezuela which topped the list with $3.7billion in the last 16 months. In the last four months, Sudan’s rose to $360million, while Egypt’s figure rose to $291 million in the last four months. Angola’s trapped funds hit $237 million in the last seven months.