Tag: Goodluck Jonathan

  • Nobody can intimidate PDP, says Jonathan

    President Goodluck Jonathan on Monday maintained that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) cannot be intimidated by any party as it has performed well in the last 16 years.

    He spoke during a one day workshop and strategic meeting for members of the PDP Ward Volunteers Scheme at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    According to him, his administration has opened up the various sectors of the economy and enabling more Nigerians to be involved in the economy.

    “On behalf of all of us who are contesting, I thank you because when you market the party you are marketing the candidates. You are doing well for our party.

    “PDP is not just the largest party in Nigeria but it is the only party that has members at all voting units. There is no other party whether two, three four, five parties coming together, they cannot reach that level. PDP has members in every voting units in this country,” Jonathan said.

    Stressing that elected PDP officials have done well at all levels, he said: “sometimes, you see people that have done nothing coming to intimidate us. Yesterday when I was in Lagos with some young people, I told them that they can set up their own independent monitoring group to assess us, we are doing better than others.”

    “It is only in PDP states that things are working. If I compare the quality of Government Houses and Presidential Lodges, the ones in PDP states are better in quality, even state universities opened by PDP states are better.”

    He went on: “The PDP states are committed to education, but sometimes people come and say we have done nothing, and the intimidation is more to the extent that even in the states where we are more, where we even have PDP governors, they come to intimidate us, and we have to resolve that we cannot allow people who are not up to us to intimidate us.”

    “At the state level and at the national level, well at the national level, we cannot compare our standards with theirs because they have not had the experience and we will not give them the opportunity. but I know they will not do well.

    “PDP is the only party that brings about peace in this country. And I always say that when you see people talking and you see the bitterness in their hearts, you see the frustration, the anger, and you see them as people who are already feeling guilty.

    “If you don’t have a forgiving heart, if you don’t have a clean heart, you cannot rule Nigeria, because you cannot give out what you don’t have.” he added

  • Jonathan mourns late Abubakar Gimba

    President Goodluck Jonathan has expressed sadness over the passing away of a distinguished writer and former President of the Association of Nigerian Authors, Alhaji Abubakar Gimba.

    President Jonathan, in a statement by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Dr. Reuben Abati, extended heartfelt condolences to Alhaji Gimba’s family, friends and associates as they mourn the literary icon who left behind a legacy of notable works such as Witness to Tears, Sunset for a Mandarin, Trails of Sacrifice and Innocent Victims.

    He believed that the late Gimba, who also had a successful career as an administrator, banker and public servant, will be long remembered for his humility, diligence, dedication to excellence and the profound understanding of human affairs exhibited in his writings.

    The statement reads: “President Jonathan urges members of Alhaji Gimba’s family, his fellow authors and all who mourn him to take solace in the knowledge that the much admired writer’s beliefs, views and insights will live forever through the body of works he has left behind for present and future generations.”

    He prayed that Almighty Allah will receive Alhaji Gimba’s soul and grant him eternal rest.

  • The Obasanjo-Jonathan tango

    The Obasanjo-Jonathan tango

    It all started like a joke, a joke that soon took on the pattern of a witch-hunt. Now, the push has come to shove, the bubble has finally burst. In the beginning, it was as if the whole country had been zoned to both President Goodluck Jonathan and his kingmaker, former President Olusegun Obasanjo, the man who likes to dominate his environment and every other thing therein either living or dead.

    At one time or the other, I have been privileged to observe, at close quarters,  these two important Nigerians who are now locked in a fratricidal war which is capable of ruffling political feathers in the country. My knowledge of Obasanjo dates back to the mid-1970s, precisely shortly after the coup through which the then Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon was ousted on June 29, 1975. It was at the end of my fourth year in the secondary school – St. John’s Grammar School, Ile-Ife. That coup thrust the late General Murtala Muhammed to the pinnacle of leadership as he succeeded Gowon as Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. That also brought Obasanjo as his second-in-command.

    From then on, Obasanjo became a regular visitor to the palace of the late Ooni of Ife, Sir Adesoji Aderemi, one of the most respected and highly revered traditional rulers of his time. Having been born and brought up in the palace, I had the privilege of being around most times Obasanjo paid his numerous visits which were mostly done incognito. He usually came in just one car, a Peugeot 504 saloon car marked SHQ 2 accompanied only by the driver and one other person at the front seat of the car, all wearing mufti. The reason for those visits was first, to seek the support of the Ooni in the policy implementation of the new government such as the land use decree and others which the government initiated and also, to seek advice and tap from the great monarch’s fountain of wisdom. In all the visits, Obasanjo cut the image of a humble, quiet and easy-going person. Even when he later became Head of State, he still maintained his close contact with the monarch. Such was the respect Obasanjo had for elders and traditional institutions. I was also around him during the 2011 elections.

    As for President Goodluck Jonathan, I had the privilege to observe him closely when he was the deputy governor in Bayelsa State. My good friend and brother, Prof. Steve Azaiki, was a two-time Secretary to the State Government of Bayelsa during that period. Each time I visited Azaiki at that time, we would both end up either in the governor’s office or in his lodge. And each time the deputy, Jonathan, appeared on the scene, either in the governor’s office with files to treat or in the governor’s lodge for some official functions, Jonathan was always humble, quiet and very reserved. Sometimes, when he opened the door to the governor’s office and saw people waiting, he will quietly shut the door and go back to his office. In some instances, Azaiki will run after him, shouting “HE…HE…HE..” (His Excellency). As soon as he caught up with him, he would either persuade him to come in and see his boss or take over the files from him and take them straight to the governor for his signature. Azaiki was like a go-between for both Jonathan and his boss at that time. Jonathan was humble, honest and shy, while the governor was a no-nonsense man. This, notwithstanding, they both had an excellent working relationship.

    What am I trying to say here? Remember the Yoruba proverb: “When a goat is pursued to the wall, it will turn back and face its pursuers.” In the current Jonathan-Obasanjo tango, I am quite sure that one of them must have pushed the other to the wall which has necessitated the other one to turn back and say, ‘Not anymore.’ We are all aware of the political permutations that threw up the ticket of both the late President Umaru Yar’Adua and Jonathan. While in the case of Yar’Adua, Obasanjo must have seen an honest and God-fearing person, in Jonathan he must have counted much on the man’s humble disposition, sense of contentment and his decent composure, even in the face of provocation. As vice president Jonathan suffered all forms of humiliation but like the humble man he is, he waded through that period without causing any form of commotion. He was truly an obedient servant.

    For everything good or bad, there is always a reward. I believe God must have rewarded Jonathan with the presidency of Nigeria. Why? I am not sure that if Yar’Adua had fully completed his two terms, it would have been possible for Jonathan to succeed him. Even when Yar’Adua was critically ill, it took the invocation of the doctrine of necessity by the National Assembly to enable Jonathan become Acting President and later, President following the eventual demise of Yar’Adua. We should take cognizance of the fact that, in the choice of Jonathan as Vice President, Obasanjo may have been thinking of a way to placate the restless militants who had then held the country by the jugular through their activities in the Niger Delta area of the country, an area that is responsible for more than 90 percent of the country’s foreign exchange earnings through the oil in its underbelly. Obasanjo could also have seen Jonathan as a humble fellow who would not rock the boat. In that case, Obasanjo must have possibly nurtured a hidden agenda which he expected to unfold as time went on.

    I believe things started falling apart between Jonathan and Obasanjo well before the 2011 election that produced Jonathan as President. Before that election in which the candidate of the ruling party, the Peoples’ Democratic Party, PDP, in Ogun State lost out, there was no love lost between Obasanjo and the leadership of the PDP. The fallout between Obasanjo and the then governor of Ogun State, Gbenga Daniel, was fuelled by the leadership of the PDP and key actors at the presidency at that time, notably Mike Oghiadomhe, the then Chief of Staff to the president and others. Backed by the other conspirators, Oghiadomhe, who was the go-between between Jonathan and Daniel, played a significant role in that messy arrangement all for reasons better known to him.

    Nevertheless, Jonathan still found a way to accommodate Obasanjo in his new government in 2011 when he appointed late Prof. Olugbenga Ashiru and Dr. Akinwunmi Adesina, Obasanjo’s two nominees, as Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for Agriculture respectively. Though the two men were eminently qualified, they were single handedly picked by Obasanjo without any input by any party member from Ogun State. Remember, Obasanjo’s appetite for globe-trotting and his entrepreneurship interest in Agriculture. These were the two reasons he brought the two men on board. While Jonathan had to drop the late Ashiru from his cabinet when he finally fell out with Obasanjo, Adesina held on because he had succeeded in dazzling the President with all his razzmatazz as Agriculture Minister.

    With Obasanjo’s penchant for dominating his environment and people around him, he may have over reached himself and forgotten that Jonathan is no longer the boy who could be tossed around. He is the President of the country. The fact is that Obasanjo will always want to have his way even if it means walking or stepping on other people’s heads. He cares no hoot. Besides, the current face-off between the two leaders shows the composure and comportment of those who are privileged to rule us. There are so many nauseating things that happen in the corridors of power especially in Africa and particularly in Nigeria, so nauseating that people will be wondering that such things could ever happen in high places. That is the way we are. Like late Ronald Reagan, former American President, once said: “I have learned that one of the most important rules of politics is poise, which means looking like an owl after you’ve behaved like a jackass.” Now, who blinks first?

  • Playing politics with human lives!

    Playing politics with human lives!

    IR: After months of turning the blind eye to the criminality in the north-east, President, Goodluck Jonathan confessed last week that his government all along took Boko Haram for granted! The president even issued a presidential order to Nigerian troops to get Boko Haram leader, Abubakar Shekau, before E-day! This is a radical departure from the president’s usual recriminations! It is as well proof, if more was needed, that the government all along took Nigerians for granted by playing politics with an insurgency that has claimed more than 13,000 lives, placed hundreds in captivity, displaced thousands, and virtually grounded the economy of the north-east.

    Of course, Boko Haram is not Jonathan’s creation; he inherited it! But then, the Boko Haram insurgency was one of the inherited ills the president consistently swore to tackle since his inauguration in 2011. What is more, he has effectively been in the saddle for five years. Is it the blood of 13,000 Nigerians that suddenly awoken the president to the danger posed by Boko Haram? Or, is it the reality of March 28 that suddenly stirred the president? For all Nigerians cared, he could have passed the buck as usual, especially as he did with shifting the February 14 elections, by claiming that he was not consulted on the security situation!

    If anything, recent ‘gains’ against Boko Haram further firm the belief that the civilised world was not unduly hysterical in accusing Nigerian authorities of playing politics with the insurgency. It is repulsive enough for a clueless government to resort to intimidation of voters in its attempt to cling to power! But the line is crossed the moment government turns the blind eye to, and is even desirous of scoring cheap political point, from the decimation of its most-prized resource! Whoever turned the blind eye as Boko Haram members abducted, raped, maimed and killed Nigerians and despoiled the north east is complicit! And much of the blame should be placed at the doorstep of President Goodluck Jonathan, a man who has a special knack for regional and parochial politics.

    Now, a word for attention-seeking publicists who flaunt President Jonathan’s veiled meekness as his main qualification for leadership. Lest we need being reminded, no great leader was ever described as meek, unassuming or incapable of hurting a fly! Nelson Mandela never turned the other cheek and, despite his gentle disposition, Mahatma Gandhi was never meek! So were the world’s best-known political leaders in whose class starry-eyed publicists lamely wish to place President Jonathan! When the chips are down, what really matters is when supposedly good men prove incapable of doing any good.

    The choice before Nigerians on March 28 is clear: it is either to back a tested race horse or an untested, patently incompetent cart horse! Sadly, even some of its best known supporters consider the idea of Nigeria’s present ruling class and vision as a contradiction! Four years ago and, for obvious reasons, a dark, cart horse was chosen for a crucial race. The decision left Nigerians in a lurch! Today, those who backed the race horse are not standing alone; next month, they will be joined by millions who were fooled, cajoled and threatened into making a costly mistake. After the self-imposed and avoidable miasma of the past 16 years, the election of an incorruptible and visionary statesman will be a welcome balm on the country’s jaded nerves.

    Now, a prayer for Nigeria: God! Direct Nigerians to elect leaders who will not play politics with the lives of their subjects. May March 28 not produce ill-prepared and divisive leaders who employ religion and ethnicity to cloak their incompetence! Can somebody say Amen?

    • Abdulrazaq Magaji,

    Abuja

  • Shipshape security

    Shipshape security

    • Nigeria’s armed forces must be fully equipped to carry out their duties

    The commissioning of four Nigerian Navy vessels by President Goodluck Jonathan last week represents a welcome improvement in the new willingness of the Federal Government to transcend rhetoric in the ongoing battle against terrorism, piracy and other security challenges bedevilling the nation.

    The Navy’s acquisitions comprise NNS Okpabana, a high-endurance cutter from the United States; NNS Prosperity, a fishery patrol boat formerly owned by the Irish Navy; NNS Centenary, an offshore patrol vessel from China; and NNS Sagbama. They are expected to enhance the Nigerian Navy’s capacity to protect offshore oil installations, combat illegal bunkering, tackle piracy, undertake emergency search-and-rescue missions, and provide logistical support to the other branches of the armed forces.

    A strong navy is the backbone of any nation’s military capability. Given its power to project sustained force over relatively long distances, the navy is vital to any strategy aimed at properly confronting the security issues facing Nigeria. President Jonathan himself emphasised this at the commissioning when he declared that a well-equipped navy was essential because of the nation’s dependence on offshore oil resources and the food security and employment potential inherent in the maritime sector.

    In spite of its best efforts, the Nigerian Navy has not been able to fully tackle the problem of oil theft and illegal bunkering to the extent that an estimated 400,000 barrels of oil are being stolen every day. Piracy in the Gulf of Guinea now exceeds that off the coast of Somalia.

    To further compound matters, the navy’s role appears to have been diminished by a recent and hideous aberration: the emergence of ex-militants as important actors in the nation’s anti-bunkering security infrastructure. It is ironic that the navy’s own acquisition of vessels comes some two months after a maritime security company owned by former warlord, Mr. Government Ekpemupolo (alias Tompolo), took delivery of seven decommissioned Norwegian battleships. Even though the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has claimed that the vessels were bought on its behalf, it is still strange that a private firm would be given priority ahead of the navy.

    It also appears that Nigeria’s efforts to overcome the Boko Haram insurgency in the north-east are being hampered by inadequate arms, ammunition and equipment. In spite of repeated denials by the military hierarchy and the Federal Government, several incidents appear to bear this notion out: the so-called “tactical manoeuvre” of August 2014, in which 480 soldiers appeared to retreat into Cameroon in the face of superior insurgent firepower, is a prominent example. In addition, several soldiers on trial for mutiny and other acts of indiscipline have argued that their actions were motivated by a refusal to go into combat without the standard complement of arms and equipment.

    This situation is indefensible, given the trillions voted for defence in recent times, in addition to the U.S. $1 billion loan recently secured by the Federal Government. It is surprising that no attempt has ever been made to undertake a comprehensive audit of all military and defence-related expenditure, in spite of the apparent disjunction between what is budgeted and what actually reaches combat units.

    The consequences of under-funded, poorly-resourced and inadequately-equipped armed forces cannot be under-estimated. Indeed, the ramifications are already tragically apparent in the anti-insurgency campaign: from a local uprising, it has spread to encompass Borno, Yobe and Adamawa sates, with deadly attacks extending to Abuja. Nigeria’s inability to handle the crisis has pulled in Cameroon, Chad and Niger. Worst of all, the shootings, bombings and terror continue unabated. If Nigeria is to triumph over the insurgents, it must ensure that its armed forces are properly equipped to carry out their statutory roles.

  • Boko Haram: Jonathan, two African leaders seek global support

    Boko Haram: Jonathan, two African leaders seek global support

    •ECOWAS, ECCAS to partner against insurgency

    President Goodluck Jonathan and two African leaders have called for more international support against terror in Nigeria and neighbouring countries.

    Jonathan, President Denis Sassou N’Guesso of the Republic of Congo and President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea spoke when the two leaders visited Nigeria.

    They met behind closed-doors for about three hours at the Presidential Wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.

    Their visit followed the decision by the Heads of State and Government of the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) at their summit in Yaoundé, Cameroon, on February 16.

    The three presidents welcomed the proposal for a joint Summit of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and ECCAS to mobilise international support for the Multi National Joint Task Force (MNJTF).

    President Jonathan promised to contact the ECOWAS chairman on the proposal. The visiting presidents undertook to relay the outcome of the meeting to the other heads of states and government of the ECCAS.

    A statement at the end of the meeting reads: “The visiting presidents held very warm and useful discussions with their host on issues of common interest to the countries of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).”

    “The three presidents reviewed the current security challenges facing the West African and Central African Regions, especially terrorism and the menace of the insurgency by Boko Haram.

    “They unequivocally condemned the insurgency, its destructive activities such as the indiscriminate killing and the wanton destruction of property, the abduction of innocent women and children, especially young school girls, who had been turned to sex slaves.

    “They underscored the imperative of a multi-prolonged approach to fighting the terrorist group and in particular, commended the initiative of the member-states of the Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC) for the MNJTF to combat the Boko Haram insurgents.

    “They welcomed the active support of the international community, especially the African Union (AU), the United Nations (UN) and other partners for the efforts of the LCBC and Benin Republic to enable the earliest deployment of the MNJTF.

    “While underscoring the fact that the MNJTF is wholly owned and driven by the member states of the LCBC, they urged the international community to render the necessary material and financial support and assistance to its on-going efforts.”

    Speaking with reporters at the end of the meeting in French, N’Guesso said the meeting deliberated on the Ebola Virus Disease and insurgency in the region.

    He said that from Abuja, they would go to Accra, Ghana to meet with President John Mahama, who chairs ECOWAS.

    “We will study the situation together and put in place security architecture to see how we can coordinate all our actions to put out and eradicate the Boko Haram, which has been spreading in a very grave manner. We look forward to peace, security and development in Africa,” he said.

     

  • APC to Jonathan: courting Yoruba monarchs won’t save you

    APC to Jonathan: courting Yoruba monarchs won’t save you

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) in the Southwest has told President Goodluck Jonathan that his last minute “romance” with the region’s monarchs will not rescue him.

    In a statement by the Director of Media and Publicity in the zone, Ayo Afolabi, the party explained the reason Jonathan would lose in the Southwest.

    According to the APC, Yoruba voted for him in 2011, following their conviction that he was a better candidate but that they were disappointed by his poor performance, particularly in the area of good governance.

    “The strategic question the President and his campaign managers should have tried to answer before engaging on the rash moves is: how many of such desperate and impromptu meetings were needed before Yoruba people voted for him in 2011?

    “How much did President Jonathan spend to get Yoruba votes in 2011 and why should he think money will save him now?

    “All other regions extracted several promises from President Jonathan in the race to the 2011 elections except the Southwest, which voted based on its convictions and commitment to justice and good governance.

    “However, despite getting Yoruba votes effortlessly, what did the region get in return? In the last five years, the Jonathan administration has shown unbearable contempt for the region and its people and their values, especially in the attempt to adulterate their leadership values.

    “For instance, many top Yoruba people in the civil service have been the victim of Jonathan administration’s nepotism.

    “Under no compulsion, no Yoruba will be proud of those President Jonathan has imposed as leaders representing Yoruba people in various capacities whether as governor, minister, or party leaders.

    “From all intent and purposes, governance has stopped in Ekiti State as the governor has been functioning more as a campaign manager with the resources of Ekiti people than as a governor. Ekiti people deserve better than they are getting.

    “The Southwest APC is confident that Yoruba monarchs and voters are conscious of the implications of such Greek Gift and as the bastion of democratic justice and good governance, they will vote true to their cultural identity that loathes tyranny, corruption, and nepotism.

    “In fact, activities in the Presidency in the last few weeks have confirmed that Jonathan did not realise the need for governance, until it was evident that Nigerians have embraced the opportunity of change offered by the APC.

    “Nigerians deserve better and they will use their votes to pass a vote of no confidence on the wasteful administration on March 28.”

  • ‘Enough of Obanikoro in FEC’

    ‘Enough of Obanikoro in FEC’

    A group, Yoruba Youth Congress (YCC), has urged the National Assembly to reject the nomination and screening of former Minister of State for Defence, Musiliu Obanikoro.

    In a statement in Akure, the Ondo State capital, YCC’s National President Dapo Adepoju wondered why President Goodluck Jonathan always related with people of “questionable character”.

    Adepoju said: “Going by Obanikoro’s antecedent, particularly his recent activities as a junior minister, he used his position to humiliate innocent Nigerians, especially during the Ekiti and Osun states governorship elections.

    “The ministerial-nominee’s involvement in the Ekiti election saga, where he allegedly colluded with some military officers and notable Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leaders to rig the poll in favour of Governor Ayodele Fayose was unpatriotic and condemnable.

    “In other climes, Obanikoro would have been probed for his role in the tension-soaked elections in Ekiti and Osun rather than being pacified with a ministerial nomination.

    “We wonder if there are no more qualified PDP members other than Obanikoro. This development is ridiculous and disturbing.”

  • Calling for Interim Govt is treasonable, says Jonathan

    President Goodluck Jonathan on Sunday insisted that an Interim National Government (ING) is unknown to the Nigerian constitution and constituting one is treasonable.

    Assuring that elections will hold in Nigeria on the new dates of March 28th and April 11th fixed by the Independent National Electoral Commission, he declared that he can never head an ING in the country or push for an interim government.

    Speaking at the opening mass for the plenary Assembly of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria at Our Lady Queen of Nigeria Pro-Cathedral, Garki, he said that interim government can only be set up by a military regime.

    Besides, he said that such ING will not be acceptable to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), African Union (AU) and the United Nations (UN).

    He said: “‎There is no way Goodluck Jonathan elected by people with clear mandate will now go and head interim Govt. The only interim Govt anybody can constitute is that of the military government which of course will not be accepted.

    “ECOWAS, AU, UN won’t accept it. And Nigeria will not be a patriah state. Clearly the insinuation of interim government to me is treasonable.” He said

    Stressing that the postponement of the elections was a blessing in disguise, he said: “Elections will be conducted as schedule by INEC”.

    “Look at what happened in Gombe on February 14th, if the elections had been held the casualty figure after that attack in Gombe would have been great. It is better for us to conduct elections that will not be contested, ‎elections that are credible, free and fair.”

    “We believe no criminal element can come and prevent us from conducting our elections. I will not do anything because of personal interest that would jeopardize the interest of this nation. ”

    Jonathan also faulted utterances that was overheating the polity and portraying Nigeria to be at a point of going up in flames.

    “When I listen to how some of us politicians talk… but God is supreme ‎this nation will survive”.

  • Crucial change of guard needed

    IR: Another four years for President Goodluck Jonathan is not a game-changer but a high risk choice.   The issue in our political firmament today is starkly a question of moral and political courage.  Jonathan who has showed a flair for a finicky, unglamorous side of governance does not have political and moral courage. His is an amorphous, compromise-orientated administration that has no definition of long range goals and no delineation of tactics and strategy for reaching those goals. We really need a change that will end many years of economic underperformance, stop the terrifying accumulation of debt and re-establish a secure fiscal foundation for Nigeria.

    The threat posed by corruption in Nigeria is alarming.  The human capital index in the country at the moment is at its lowest ebb. President Jonathan has failed to take effective measures that will reduce corruption. All we get from his administration is a rambling and solipsistic narrative. About 112 million Nigerians are currently living in poverty.  Unemployment is at a record 34 percent and the poverty level stands at 71 percent. According to the Nigerian Bureau of Statistics (NBS), poverty incidence moved from 69 percent in 2010 to 71 percent in 2011. This is a sad commentary on the state of our economy.

    The government of Jonathan has been characterized by low growth, high unemployment and high debt profile. The president has done absolutely nothing to close the gap between spending and revenue. According to the NBS, the combined domestic and external debt of the Federal government is well over $40 billion. The fall in the oil revenue has exposed the government as incompetent and lacking in planning. Despite the unprecedented boom in oil sales, this administration instead of adding to the external reserves ended up depleting it. As of today, the naira has crashed against the United States dollar from 191 to 208 at the parallel market. The dollar is currently selling between N208 and N210 in the black market. This is partly due to the fall in oil revenue and partly due to sheer incompetence of the present government.

    Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo, recently admitted that oil theft has reached an alarming proportion. She said it has reduced oil output from the average 2.3-2.4 million barrels per day to 1.95mpd. This means that at least 350,000 to 450,000 barrels per day are stolen and it translates to about $60 billion in the past four years.

    It is obvious we need a better manager of our economy. Let us not be carried away by the fawning praises of the president’s men who are only interested in piling up a considerable personal fortune. We have to blame Jonathan for the political and economic mistakes of the past six years. He is wholly unable to manage the mighty egos he has assembled. At the moment, there is no adult in charge in Nigeria. The president has a problem in decision-making. He is making too much mistakes on key economic issues and we need to halt this decline. Under Jonathan, Nigeria is no longer a super-power.  It is rather a super-power in retreat.

    We need someone who will bring back innovative spark in the economic affairs of the nation. We need someone who will bring us out of this death spiral. Someone who will help create plans to generate more income because great opportunities abound in Nigeria.  Some people are always pointing at Jonathan meek and gentle nature as an evidence of his capability to lead Nigeria.  That is standing logic on its head.   That he acts with courtly solicitousness does not translate to competence.

    Jonathan has met his nemesis in General Muhammadu Buhari.   The retired General is a politician who believes more in content than in form, more in reform than in rhetoric. He will ride the economy in the direction that will be advantageous to the Nigerian interest. The man is simply sincere about addressing our economic woes. As president, he will assembly a credible management team that will produce stunning performance. Buhari only wants a political system that is more vigorous and more capable of mobilizing national resources for specific political ends. His path to prosperity is our only hope.

     

    • Ikechukwu Orji

    Lagos