Tag: Goodluck Jonathan

  • ‘Jonathan has committed  impeachable offences’

    ‘Jonathan has committed impeachable offences’

    An All Progressives Congress (APC) senator representing Edo North, Domingo Obende, has said President Goodluck Jonathan has committed some impeachment offences.

    But he said the Senate shunned impeaching him because it wanted to avoid causing chaos in the polity.

    Domingo was reacting to the gale of impeachment by the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) against governors of the main opposition, the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    His take was that the PDP had not been tolerant as the APC.

    The senator noted that had the APC been on the rampage like the PDP, Jonathan would have been impeached long ago for the glaring impeachable offences he had committed.

    Domingo warned that if the PDP does not soft-pedal on its intolerance and obsession for impeachment, the nation’s fledgling democracy would be in grave danger.

    The Vice-Chairman of the Senate Committee on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) addressed reporters at his home in Igarra, Akoko-Edo Local Government Area.

    He said: “What is happening is very surprising to some of us. There is danger around the corner. The danger is in the political arena. This is because a political system that ought to be stable, that thrives on impeachment threats does not augur well. What are we even talking about? Who is saying that the President has not committed an impeachable offence?

    “The National Assembly ought to be looking at these. But for reasons bordering on the need for stability and because the leadership of the National Assembly is mature in handling issues, we look at Nigeria as an entity that must be salvaged. Of course, the whole of Africa is looking at us as the giant of the continent. Are we going to be a giant in rascality?

    “To me, I see it as a clear parliamentary misbehaviour, where governors, who were given the mandate by their people, are not allowed to exercise their rights. And if they sure do, it is only the people who can call for their recall.

    “I think if you asked me, there should be a total repeal of these sections of harassment of impeachment (from the constitution).”

    While lamenting the flagrant abuse of existing laws before an impeachment can be said to carried out posited “Let it go through the court process first and if you win in the courts you can now come to the house and seek for an impeachment and of course they must query the chief judges who will just set up panel without having to know if the cases are right if such a person should be impeached.

    “For me, what is happening in Edo state, they know what they are doing now is illegal because the courts have told them to go and obey the law of the house because they are internal laws that govern what they are doing.

    “I have never heard or seen two chambers sitting on a state matter. Some are legislating and transmitting to Abuja or to EFCC or wherever.

    “We have a body and that is the state assembly commission.”

     

     

  • Obiano to build three flyovers

    Obiano to build three flyovers

    The Transformation Ambassadors of Nigeria (TAN) has cautioned opponents of President Goodluck Jonathan against desecrating the nation’s top office in the name of politics.

    Co- ordinator of  the legal department of the NGO, Mr Nureni Otutu stated this in Ilorin, the Kwara state capital yesterday.

    He said:  “it is only in Nigeria that an individual or group of individuals will hurl insults on the person of the President. Yes there is freedom of speech, this freedom should be exercised with decorum, decency and respect.

    Otutu said the office of the president should be sacred which must be respected and revered at all times.

    He commended President Goodluck Jonathan for “the good job he has been done”. According to him, the outstanding performance of Dr Jonathan is the bond between TAN, the president and the Nigerian masses, because his group is out to promote good governance aimed at making life easier and better for Nigerians.

    Otutu said: “President Jonathan is a personification of quality leadership in humility. He has brought decency into the administration of the country, the result of which is landmark accomplishment in almost all the sectors of the economy”.

     

  • Apo killings reprise?

    Apo killings reprise?

    If it’s true, as President Goodluck Jonathan’s henchmen never tire of peddling, that Boko Haram is a weapon fashioned by the opposition to destabilise their principal and stop him from contesting next year’s election, never mind winning it, then the cold blooded murder of nearly three dozen members of the Shi’a community in Zaria last week by soldiers is a clear testimony that his army has not learnt, and is probably unwilling to learn, the lesson of the transmutation of Boko Haram from a mere irritant into the greatest threat to the country’s unity, peace and security in under five years.

    By now we are all familiar with what happened last Friday in Zaria during the annual procession of the members of the sect in support of victims of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. This year’s procession coincided with the ongoing massive invasion of Gaza by the Israeli, ostensibly in retaliation for the kidnap and murder of three Israeli youths, which the Israeli hawkish Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, conveniently but wrongly, as it has since turned out, blamed on Hamas, the authority in Gaza.

    Several of those in the Zaria procession carried placards with unflattering inscriptions not only about the Israelis but also about our President, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, and his wife, Patience, accusing both of being the dark forces behind Boko Haram. Sources close to the Shi’a leadership believe this may have incensed the soldiers whose commander, like the president, is said to be Ijaw.

    The soldiers have since claimed that they shot at the procession in self defence. The number of casualties – 35 dead, including three sons of the Shi’a leader, Sheikh Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, and many more injured – suggests otherwise, a scepticism apparently shared by the presidency, which has ordered investigations.

    The soldiers’ claim sounds familiar but rings hollow in the light of the similar killings on September 20 last year of eight, and the injuring of 11 more, tricycle riders living in an uncompleted building in the Apo Legislative Quarters, Abuja. Then as now, the army said it killed the tricyclists in self-defence. Senate investigations of the case came to the self-contradictory conclusion that the squatters were unarmed and harmless, but cleared the security personnel, who said they had raided the building in search of a Boko Haram kingpin, of extra-judicial murder.

    An apparently more thorough investigation by the National Human Rights Commission (NHCR) reached the unequivocal conclusion that the security forces killed the squatters in cold blood and ordered the Federal Government to pay relatives of the victims N135million as compensation.

    What happened in Zaria last Friday shows that the lesson of NHRC’s embarrassing indictment of the security forces has not been learnt. But even more worrying is that the even more profound lesson of the genesis of Boko Haram as the greatest threat to the country’s unity, peace and security has also not been learnt, if not by the presidency itself at least by those in charge of its instruments of coercion.

    Until 2009, when the late President Umaru Musa Yar’adua sent in the troops to wipe out Boko Haram because of its repeated confrontations with security forces, it was essentially a mere irritant to the local authorities in Maiduguri, the Borno State capital. The soldiers seemed to have succeeded at first. Its headquarters was razed to the ground and hundreds of its members killed and its leader, Muhammadu Yusuf, captured alive and well and handed over to the police.

    Instead of trying him, he was murdered in cold blood in police custody. Following public outrage, President Yar’adua set up a panel to investigate the case. This was in August 2009. Nearly five years on, nothing has been heard of the investigation.

    In between, even more cold-blooded murder of members of the sect was carried out by the security forces. In one particularly gruesome footage of the killings that was aired by Aljazeera months after the murder of Yusuf, one apparently blood-thirsty policeman was heard telling a colleague not to shoot one victim in the chest because he wanted the victim’s heart!

    Again, public outrage at the Aljazeera footage forced government to set up another enquiry and promised swift prosecution of those implicated in the killings. Again, as with the killing of Yusuf, nothing more was heard of the case. There was an attempt to prosecute a few suspects, but it all seemed so half-hearted.

    If the authorities calculated that with time, everything will fizzle out as usual, they apparently calculated wrongly; a little over a year after these incidents, Boko Haram returned with a vengeance. Since then, it has transmogrified into a hideous monster that government seems incapable of eliminating.

    It should worry the authorities that, unlike Boko Haram, the Shi’a in Nigeria, or Muslim Brothers as they choose to call themselves, are huge in number and are much more organised and disciplined. It is therefore important that the Federal Government conducts a thorough and satisfactory investigation of what happened in Zaria last Friday.

    Failure to do so will only further confirm many Nigerians in their suspicion that the authorities have found Boko Haram a convenient cover to destabilise the North as the greatest opposition to President Jonathan’s apparent determination to remain on his seat in next year’s election come what may.

    It is gladdening that he has ordered an investigation of the incident, but the way some of his henchmen have carried on about the June 23 twin-suicide bomb, but happily unsuccessful, attacks on a former head of state and leading opposition leader, Maj.-Gen. Muhammadu Buhari and the Tijjaniya leader, Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi, one could be forgiven the conclusion that the president is only too glad to see the North stew in its own Boko Haram predicament.

    One such henchman, Alhaji Mujahid Asari-Dokubo, seemed to have surpassed even himself as the president’s self-chosen viral attack dog when he said the other day that Gen. Buhari staged the suicide bomb on his own convoy to draw public sympathy. Another, Mr. Olisa Metuh, the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) spokesman, was not as disingenuous as the ex-militant when he said the bombing was the act of the general’s rivals within the opposition. Still his theory was disingenuous enough to have prompted a rebuke from both the party and the presidency.

    From past events it would be surprising if the authorities distanced themselves from any of the two.

    However, whether they distance themselves or not, it is, I must say again, important that what happened in Zaria last Friday does not go unpunished. We have enough problems dealing with Boko Haram we do not want to create another, and probably worse, monster. Unless, of course, the authorities, as many Nigerians believe, do not give a damn about the many innocent blood that have been shed as a result of Boko Haram insurrection because it is “they” and not “us”.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • ‘President has committed  impeachable  offences’

    ‘President has committed impeachable offences’

    An All Progressives Congress (APC) senator representing Edo North, Domingo Obende, has said President Goodluck Jonathan has committed some impeachment offences.

    But he said the Senate shunned impeaching him because it wanted to avoid causing chaos in the polity.

    Domingo was reacting to the gale of impeachment by the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) against governors of the main opposition, the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    His take was that the PDP had not been tolerant as the APC.

    The senator noted that had the APC been on the rampage like the PDP, Jonathan would have been impeached long ago for the glaring impeachable offences he had committed.

    Domingo warned that if the PDP does not soft-pedal on its intolerance and obsession for impeachment, the nation’s fledgling democracy would be in grave danger.

    The Vice-Chairman of the Senate Committee on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) addressed reporters at his home in Igarra, Akoko-Edo Local Government Area.

    He said: “What is happening is very surprising to some of us. There is danger around the corner. The danger is in the political arena. This is because a political system that ought to be stable, that thrives on impeachment threats does not augur well. What are we even talking about? Who is saying that the President has not committed an impeachable offence?

    “The National Assembly ought to be looking at these. But for reasons bordering on the need for stability and because the leadership of the National Assembly is mature in handling issues, we look at Nigeria as an entity that must be salvaged. Of course, the whole of Africa is looking at us as the giant of the continent. Are we going to be a giant in rascality?

    “To me, I see it as a clear parliamentary misbehaviour, where governors, who were given the mandate by their people, are not allowed to exercise their rights. And if they sure do, it is only the people who can call for their recall.

    “I think if you asked me, there should be a total repeal of these sections of harassment of impeachment (from the constitution).”

    While lamenting the flagrant abuse of existing laws before an impeachment can be said to carried out posited “Let it go through the court process first and if you win in the courts you can now come to the house and seek for an impeachment and of course they must query the chief judges who will just set up panel without having to know if the cases are right if such a person should be impeached.

    “For me, what is happening in Edo state, they know what they are doing now is illegal because the courts have told them to go and obey the law of the house because they are internal laws that govern what they are doing.

    “I have never heard or seen two chambers sitting on a state matter. Some are legislating and transmitting to Abuja or to EFCC or wherever.

    “We have a body and that is the state assembly commission.”

     

     

  • True federalism divides North, South delegates

    True federalism divides North, South delegates

    The National Conference is reconvening next week to ratify its final report before it is submitted to President Goodluck Jonathan. Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN examines the implication of the stalemate between delegates from the North and the South over the revenue formula for the polity.

    Analysts have predicted a stormy session, as the National Conference reconvenes next week to wrap up its final report. The deadlock between delegates from the North and the South over the revenue sharing formula is not likely to be broken. On the contrary, there is likely to be disagreements in some areas that have already been decided. Although the conference had adopted the reports of 19 out 20 committees, it failed to agree on the derivation and revenue sharing formula. The conference is likely to insist on its earlier position that the Federal Government should set up a technical committee to resolve the matter.

    A source said Northern delegates believe the proposals so far adopted may worsen the plight of the region, which is even not happy with some provisions of the 1999 Constitution, particularly the 13 per cent derivation to the oil-producing states.

    Besides, the North, on a second thought, may push for the a reversal of decisions on local government administration, state police, land tenure, state creation, derivation principle and pilgrimage. Northern delegates are uncomfortable with the resolution that local government administration should be transferred from the exclusive legislative List to the concurrent legislative list. The region is believed to be banking on its numerical strength in the National Assembly to frustrate aspects of the report it consider antagonistic to its interests. That is why the conference ended abruptly two weeks ago.

    The Southsouth is insisting on true federalism. The leaders at a stakeholders meeting held recently had directed delegates from the region to walk out on the next sitting, if other regions are not ready to accept true federalism as a solution to the crisis currently facing the country. They rejected the 18 per cent derivation proposed for mineral producing areas and ruled out the suggestion that five per cent derivation be allotted to states in the North for the reconstruction of their economy ravaged by insurgency and internal conflicts, describing it as non-issue.

    The way out of the log jam,  Southsouth leaders insist, is going back to true fiscal federalism with 50 per cent derivation to oil-producing states as was the practice before the  civil war and the  creation of 12 states in 1967.

    A political scientist Dr Friday Ibok, has explained why the North is resistance to change. According to him, the current structure of the federation clearly places the North in a vantage position relative to all other section of the country. So, the resistance to change from the core North was understandable and indeed unexpected,  he added.

    “The military rulers that fashioned out the 1999 Constitution were all from the region, and had erected the structures of state to favour their people, especially in the distribution of states and local governments. Furthermore, they had assumed that the North would always control power at the centre, a consideration that gave rise to making the centre strong, at the expense of the federating units. They also guaranteed, through the constitution, that the North would have a comfortable majority in the National Assembly, making it near impossible to make any constitutional changes that will whittle down their power to lord it over the rest of the country.

    “The totality of the North’s position is that while they may accept some inconsequential amendments to the 1999 Constitution, they are doggedly opposed to the writing of a new one. Not even with the President’s green light, as expressed in his conference inauguration address that a new constitution could be recommended if the conference found it desirable.

    “The northern delegates were always quick to point out at every opportunity that the conference was not elected; that it lacked the powers to write a new constitution and that all the outcomes of its deliberations must be forwarded to the National Assembly.

    “My interpretation of the core North delegates disposition is to frustrate regionalism, frustrate the reduction of presidential powers, frustrate fiscal federalism, frustrate the emergence of a new constitution, resist the call for a referendum and ensure minimal, if any departures from the 1999 Constitution and ensure that all the outcomes of the conference go to the National Assembly, where the North has the majority to set aside the recommendations that does not favour it.”

    Former Chief Whip of the Senate Senator Rowland Owie bared his mind over the revenue sharing formula impasse: “The controversy is very unfortunate and I see it as another plot to continue with the marginalisation of the people of the Southsouth, who produce the oil. I do not think it will be wrong for the delegates to give the marginalised people of the Southsouth what they deserve and stop this bickering. The South has been of great assistance to the North. We have always supported their political interest, so they should not think we are fools. I do not see anything wrong if the people are even allowed to control their resources while they pay tax to the Federal Government. Let us practice true federalism so that all these problems will be a thing of the past.

    In Professor Ibrahim Gambari’s view, the controversy is avoidable if delegates had put the interests of the nation above that of their region and ethnic groups. According to him, there was possibility that consensus could be reached by the conference if delegates allowed the report of the 50-wise men to be deliberated upon.

    The former Permanent Representative of Nigeria to the United Nations (UN) was cut in the web of the controversy over revenue sharing formula; he was labelled a sell out by the northern delegates. Gambari however absolved himself of any wrong doing. He said: “It is unfortunate that when it has now come to the issue of sharing, then this fight broke out. Things were not meant to be this ugly. It is not as simple as that. There have been reports alluding to the fact I was the hatchet man for the North; that I was clamouring for the actualisation of a so-called national agenda.

    “This is unfortunate. I am surprised at what is happening regarding this issue. All my life, I have been a detribalised personality. Everyone knows this — even before my sojourn into the world of diplomacy – my background at the Ahmadu Bello University and all that. At the conference, I was always working to ensure that things did not fall apart. Starting from the work we did as part of the ’50 Wise Men’.

    “Through and through, I have been working as the bridge builder and consensus-rallying figure. That was how we were able to go through the first hurdle, which had to do with brokering the rules. Without the work of the elder statesmen in the house, you would not have the idea of 20 committees, and 19 committee reports sailed through,” Gambari posited.

    A delegate from Ondo State, Chief Olusola Ebiseni, said: If the five per cent voted for areas affected by terrorism was adopted, it would trigger insurgency and terrorism in other parts of the country. He warned that it was dangerous to insert such a thing like an insurgency intervention fund in the constitution. Ebiseni pointed out that the Federal Government had already been constitutionally empowered to intervene in such emergency.

    He said it was needless to allocate five per cent of the Federation Account for insurgency intervention since it was empowered to undertake such interventions from the appropriate heads from its allocation from the Federation Account.

    He said: “Rather than introduce new and dangerous terms such as insurgency and terrorism as possible revenue heads in our law as if such has become a permanent feature of our national existence with attraction for nationwide spread, the group simply have increased the percentage under the existing allocation indices aforesaid.

    “It stands to reason that if the Federal Government has been prosecuting the Amnesty Programme and release the sum of N30 billion recently for the rehabilitation of the Northeast under these existing revenue heads, we could achieve more effective results by increasing the percentage there under rather than plunging the conference and the nation into needless controversies by these unsolicited permutations”.

    Ebiseni noted that the position of the northern delegates in the impasse over derivation formula and resource control could best be described as double standard. “It is instructive that the North that vehemently opposed recognition of regions or zones as administrative federating units will inconsistently embrace it now for revenue grabbing.

    “If the five per cent increase in derivation is assumed for the Southsouth, where lies the fateof the Southeast which was plundered by three years of civil war or the Southwest, which was rendered prostrate by the Federal Government from June 12, 1993 till 1998,” he asked.

    On the way forward, Gambari said:  “There has been too much sentiments on this issue of revenue sharing, which is being singled out. The northern delegates think that, having been made to lose further revenue through moving the money accruing to the oil producing areas from 13 to 18 per cent, the five per cent emergency fund  should be dedicated to areas ravaged in the North and after all, the five per cent is from the money accruing to the Federal Government, not what the entire country earns.

    He added: “The South feels that the fund should not be restricted to a particular section of the country. This is especially the Southsouth. Those from Southeast and Southwest took a slightly different position. Both points from either side are strong and persuasive. They underscored the need to have a time line set for it, so it should be time bound and not forever fund meant for the North, even when the problems of insurgency and its devastations would have been taken care of.

    Against the backdrop that the National Conference would address the national question on revenue sharing, social critic Bernard Briggs said: “It is disappointing that people went to the conference to turn the truth on its head. If the purpose of the gathering of the ethnic nationalities was to redefine the destiny of the nation, then it is clear that the solution is true fiscal federalism, which we practised in the post independence era. It is not new. It was enshrined in the 1960 and 1963 constitutions. The Southsouth is not demanding anything extra-ordinary. Rather, the people are saying let’s return to true fiscal federalism which was in vogue before military intervention”.

    “The 13 per cent derivation was a mere gift to the people without considering the magnitude of the disaster caused by oil exploration. Even though the oil producing communities did not ask for the 50 per cent that was in vogue during cocoa, groundnut and palm oil production, the focus of the non-oil producing areas continued to be on further reduction of the 13 per cent to nothing. The result is that there is no meaningful attention by the Federal Government to develop the area.”

    Briggs added: “The National Conference has failed the people of this country.  Those of us who were opposed to its being set up by the Jonathan administration have been vindicated. A conference that cannot come up with acceptable revenue sharing formula is a waste. The Jonathan government has wasted over N7 billion spent on it.”

     

     

     

     

  • Jonathan, governors condole with  el-Rufai over son’s death

    Jonathan, governors condole with el-Rufai over son’s death

    President Goodluck Jonathan and some yesterday commiserated with former Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, over the death of his son, Hamza, in an accident.

    Hamza, a graduate of the University of Virginia and United World College of the Atlantic in the United States, died in an auto crash in the FCT.

    Jonathan, Governors Ibikunle Amosun (Ogun), Abiola Ajimobi (oyo) and Ramalan Yero (Kaduna) expressed shock over the death of the young El-Rufai, adding that no amount of consolation could fill the gap that Hamza’s death has created.

    In a statement yesterday by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Dr. Reuben Abati, the President commiserated with El-Rufai and members of his family.

    He hoped the outpouring of support by friends and associates would comfort the former minister.

    Jonathan prayed for the peaceful repose of the soul of the departed and God’s blessings, comfort and protection on Mallam El-Rufai and the rest of his family.

    Amosun expressed deep shock and sent heartfelt condolences to the family of Mallam El-Rufai.

    In a statement yesterday in Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital, by his Senior Special Assistant on Media, Mrs Olufunmilayo Wakama, the governor described the demise of Hamzat as “most regrettable and unfortunate”.

    Amosun added: “It is so sad that his life was cut short in a fatal accident at a time he would have been contributing his quota to the development of his fatherland after acquiring a good education.”

    The governor prayed Allah to grant the soul of the departed Al-Janah Fridaus and his family the fortitude to bear the irreparable loss.

    Ajimobi commiserated with El-Rufai through a statement yesterday in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, by his Special Adviser on Media, Dr. Festus Adedayo.

    The governor described the death of the son of the All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftain as unfortunate and disheartening.

    Ajimobi said: “It is with deep shock that I received the death of Hamza, a promising young man, in a ghastly motor accident that occurred in Abuja on Tuesday.

    “It is even more painful considering the fact that he was snatched by the cold hands of death at the prime of his life.”

    The governor described the deceased as a rising star and potential leader of tomorrow.

    He urged the former minister to accept the incident as an act of God, adding that nothing could happen to any human being without the knowledge of God.

    Ajimobi prayed for the repose of the soul of the deceased. He beseeched God to grant El-Rufai and his family the fortitude to bear the irreparable loss.

    Yero expressed deep sadness over Hamza’s death.

    In a condolence message by his Director-General, Media and Publicity, Malam Ahmed Maiyaki, the governor said he received news of Hamza’s death with shock and grief.

    He said: “The demise of Hamza, a young, intelligent young man with bright prospects, is a huge loss to the country, especially to us in Kaduna State.”

    Yero urged El-Rufai’s family to take the irreparable loss as an act of Allah, who knows best.

    He said: “I urge the entire El-Rufai family, their friends and associates to take solace in the fact that the late Hamza lived a short but eventful lifetime full of positive narrations.”

    Yero prayed Allah to grant the soul of the late Hamza eternal rest.

    The governor also prayed Almighty Allah to grant the El-Rufai family the fortitude to bear the loss.

     

  • 2015: Jonathan’s aides, governors  clash over PDP tickets

    2015: Jonathan’s aides, governors clash over PDP tickets

    President Goodluck Jonathan and his strategists have launched a secret plot to win more states in the North, sources said at the weekend.

    Some ministers, presidential aides, associates and friends of the President from the Northwest and northeast are being drafted into the governorship race in the 13 states in the two geopolitical zones and in Kwara and Nasarawa states.

    But most PDP governors in some of the states are opposed to plans to impose presidential aides or public officers as governorship candidates.

    The governors are also launching counter-strategies to checkmate the aides who are equating closeness to the President with automatic tickets.

    Apart form using their influence in power to develop their areas and assist their people, the said ministers, top aides and presidential associates are believed to have the wherewithal  to pursue a governorship aspiration.

    Some of those likely to be used to attract votes for the PDP and Jonathan are the Comptroller-General of Customs, Inde Dikko(Katsina); retiring Inspector General of Police (IGP) Mohammed Abubakar(Zamfara); ex-UBEC Executive Secretary Dr. Mohammed Modibbo, Hon. Awwal Tukur, the Principal Secretary to the President, Hassan Tukur(Adamawa); FCT Minister, Bala Mohammed(Bauchi); the Coordinator of the Counter Terrorism Centre in the Presidency, Maj.-General SarkinYaki Bello(Kebbi);  Minister of State for Power Mohammed Wakili(Borno);  Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum Resources, Danladi Kifasi (Taraba) and the Deputy Governor of  Sokoto State, Alhaji Mukhtar Shagari(Sokoto).

    Others are ex-Minister of State for Finance Yerima Ngama; Mohammed Abacha (Kano); ex-Minister Aliyu Modibbo (Gombe); Labaran Maku (Nasarawa)and Dele Belgore (Kwara).

    A source, who spoke in confidence said: “Some of these public officers have started consultations, having got the consent of presidential strategists whose advice on the choice of Ayodele Fayose for Ekiti poll worked.

    “In fact, the posters one of the public officers, CG Inde Dikko, recently flooded Katsina State until security agencies asked the Presidency to call his supporters to order.

    “It is apparent to everyone that Bala Mohammed has been servicing his structure in Bauchi State including the recent renovation of Bauchi Central Mosque. Bala is also central to the funding of PDP in the state.”

    Abubakar is not interested in partisan politics – it is widely believed – but there has been pressure on him by powerful stakeholders in Zamfara State and presidential strategists to give the governorship race a shot.

    “The non-extension of IGP’s tenure was attributed to the strategists’ interest in Abubakar as the next governor of Zamfara State. In spite of the fact that a friend of the IGP, who is a former member of the House of Representatives, had initially been penciled down for the governorship seat, the ex-lawmaker might be persuaded to step down for Abubakar,” another source said, adding  that the  IGP has not made up his mind on whether or not to go into partisan politics or not.

    A Presidency chief is said to have played a crucial role in the impeachment of ex-Adamawa State Governor Murtala Nyako not only to prove his loyalty but to soften the ground for his governorship ambition.

    “But some forces in PDP in Adamawa State are routing for a former Executive Secretary of the Universal Basic Education Commission, Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Modibbo, who is said to be closer to the first family. Jonathan’s denial of Modibbo of a second term ticket was attributed to his governorship plan for him,” said the source.

    Also in the race in Adamawa State is a former member of the House of Representatives, Awwal Tukur. Tukur’s ambition is reinforced by the need to compensate his father, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, who was forced to quit as the PDP National Chairman.

    But it was gathered that some of the PDP governors are uncomfortable with plans by the President’s strategists to impose governorship candidates on them in their states.

    Those believed to be opposed to the “rampaging” presidential aides are Governors Ibrahim Shema; Isa Yuguda; Saidu Dakingari; and Acting Governors Garba Umar (Taraba) and Umaru Fintiri (Adamawa).

    Shema is uncomfortable with the push for Dikko by some forces in Abuja. Since the governor controls the party structure, it may be difficult for the Customs boss to get the ticket.

    “There is an ongoing cold war between Shema and Dikko’s supporters in Katsina.”

    “A cat and mouse game is existing between Governor Yuguda and the FCT Minister, Bala Mohammed on PDP’s governorship ticket. In spite of the fact that the minister was once a Special Assistant to Yuguda when he was the Minister of Aviation, their relationship has degenerated.

    “In recent years, they have tried to reconcile but Yuguda will not be willing to allow Bala, who is a ‘godson’ of First Lady Dame Patience Jonathan, to succeed him.”

    Acting Governor of Taraba State Garba Umar is believed to be preparing to run. The party structure is already under his control.

    But the Christians in the state, who are in the majority, want power to return to them.

    This is why they are pushing for Danladi Kifasi, a permanent secretary who is rated as a man of probity. Senator Emman Bwacha is also keen as Suntai’s “anointed candidate”.

    Adamawa acting Governor Umaru Fintiri is widely beleived to be interested in becoming the governor, “not minding his pact with stakeholders”.

    On the situation in Kebbi State, a top source said: “We are not in a military era; nobody has told Governor Saidu Dakingari that Maj.-Gen. SarkinYaki Bello must be anointed.

    “I think Bello is trying to wield the connections he built in the Niger Delta to seek gubernatorial mandate. But politics is a different ball game.”

  • Pharaoh on the prowl

    Pharaoh on the prowl

    Honestly, Goodluck Jonathan, president of the Federal Republic, never intended to be a Pharaoh, or Nebuchadnezzar, or an army general, or a dictator. He openly said so.

    But then, move over, Pharaoh; move over, Nebuchadnezzar; move over, army general, move over, dictator!  In vicious projection of presidential power, Dr. Jonathan is putting you all to shame!

    This is one Pharaoh that knows no Joseph when an enemy, real or perceived, must be crushed!  Beware, Pharaoh is on the prowl!

    It is not unlike the biting philosophy of the anonymous philosopher, off one of the balconies of Teddar Hall, across the road from the Kunle Adepeju Students Union Complex, at the University of Ibadan campus of the early to mid-1980s.  This man of wit always put his thoughts across by chalk on board.

    During the Second Republic (1979-1983), when corruption tore the roof under President Shehu Shagari, the philosopher quipped, with devastating pun: Shall we then all go and Sha(re)gari at State House Ribadu(n) Road?

    “Riba” is slang for bribe.  “Dun” is Yoruba for sweet.  Ribadu Road, Ikoyi, was the Dodan Barracks seat of the president, rechristened to reflect the democratic interregnum.  “Gari” is a Nigerian staple — fantastic pun!

    But the Jonathan metamorphosis, despite an earlier public declamation, has more to do with another from the campus philosopher’s rich repertoire: He was mercy-ful.  But then Mercy left him.  So, he became merciless!

    No pussyfooting, this president has become merciless!  So enemies, beware, quake and fear!  With the impeachment gale sweeping through opposition camps, that warning is rather trite.

    Fine, the Adamawa case is rascality versus counter-rascality.  The opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) poached the Adamawa governorship from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), at the height of the PDP meltdown.  What APC gained by defection power therefore, PDP has regained by executive clobber!  Rascality cancels out rascality, chikena!

    But there is no moral high ground here.  Before PDP got a dose of its bitter pill, poaching by illicit defection had been its virulent patent, to illegally decimate the opposition.  Indeed, what goes around comes around!

    Still, if rascality begot rascality in Adamawa, the ongoing case of Nasarawa is one-way rascality — rude, bounding and brazen.

    The 2011 elections gifted Nasarawa political schizophrenia: a Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) governor in Umaru Al-Makura; and a  PDP-dominated legislature.  So, no one can accuse Governor Al-Makura of taking a PDP mandate to the opposition, after his party and others formed the APC.

    So, the ongoing impeachment process to unseat Governor Al-Makura is nothing but in-your-face outlawry to steal a governorship, ironically by supposed lawmakers across the partisan divide.  Yes, the legalistic-minded would argue: Alhaji Al-Makura’s deputy would still be an APC governor, so there is no question of a PDP steal.  Besides, if the governor isn’t guilty of “misconduct”, he need not fear removal — pure, undiluted cant!

    And if anyone still doubts where the darts are coming from, the Nasarawa legislators’ “private visit” to Aso Rock, offers a clue — as if there is need for one!

    Of course, all these presidential rascality would crash.  It always does.

    President Olusegun Obasanjo, during his own time as democratic maximum ruler, aided and abetted many of such manufactured impeachments, the most hideous of which was Oyo Governor, Rashidi Ladoja, who must be removed because he would not share his security vote with Lamidi Adedibu, the late amala-and-gbegiri politician, Ladoja’s estranged godfather and Obasanjo’s beloved “garrison commander”, before whom an elected governor must bow and tremble!

    It all blew in Obasanjo’s face, with Ladoja’s judicial recall to office, even if, by his peculiar politicking, Ladoja has proved rather undeserving of that democratic grace.

    But the eventual crash would come, not necessarily by a court voiding the impeachment process, but by the wilful destruction of democratic institutions by power brigands.  Indeed, yesterday’s power recklessness is today’s Boko Haram!

    By  the way, the only way brazen criminality against governors, by hostile federal forces, is succeeding is because the central government has a monopoly of security forces.  The moment that becomes history, the federal bully would know it has a helluva battle in its hands.  That, would be the day!

    This reckless projection of federal illicit power is bad enough.  But it pales into nothing, compared with the future it dooms.

    Gen. Ibrahim Babangida’s military government was so corrupt it was believed that government raised sleaze to the pedestal of the fundamental principle of state policy.  Bad as it was when it was happening, it was its blighting of the future — now — that has been so devastating.  Now, there is a merry and complete loss of values.

    By the same token, the Jonathan Presidency has begun to impose a new set of democratic  travesty: after Ekiti, a new culture of an irrational electorate is afoot: punish hard work but reward sloth; punish brilliance but reward dullness; punish solid performance but reward clear demagoguery!

    Where will this crass irrationality lead a democratic republic, or even the Nigerian state itself?

    The president, head of an ultra-dull presidency that could hardly boast any groundbreaking policy or innovation, appears to have developed zero-tolerance for gubernatorial brilliance; just to divert attention from his own parlous record; and also shift attention from serious electoral issues to emotive power play that would impress the gullible.

    That would explain why Oyo’s Adebayo Alao-Akala, an ideas vacuum in his first tour of duty as Oyo governor, whose grandest philosophy appeared the neck-chain to wear, the face powder to dub or the perfume to wear, has re-found his voice, merrily declaring himself the next Oyo governor — despite the stark difference between his parlous record and the glittering  performance of Abiola Ajimobi, the incumbent.

    Of course, Mr. Alao-Akala is pitching the Jonathan dream electorate: elders without wisdom, youths without gumption and the middle-aged happily blundering between these two extremes of the brain-dead!

    But the most tragic, in the run-up to the August 9 Osun gubernatorial poll, is the Iyiola Omisore boast.  The PDP candidate brags he would win in all local governments.  Yet, he frantically flees from debates, the latest of which was “Manifesto Hour”, the July 26 programme, organised by the International Republican Institute (IRI), to be broadcast live by the Osun State Broadcasting Corporation (OSBC).  Other than demonising Rauf Aregbesola’s visible accomplishments, he has not articulated  programmes of his own.  And, of course, the eternal bad-tempered threats!

    So, on what basis would he win the election?  On the basis of the present federal paralysis under Jonathan; or the past Osun paralysis when PDP ruled the roost; and Omisore himself was senator at the centre?  O, perhaps on a third: that federal might would fix it!

    Why, a Premium Times online report even suggests the Jonathan federal armada might be pressing the panic button by reportedly directing operatives of DSS to “invade” TNS-RMS, a Lagos research and marketing firm, contracted to do an opinion poll on the Osun election.

    The “invaders’” fear?  That the poll’s results might favour Aregbesola!  These are unusual times indeed!

    The Jonathan presidency may have resigned itself to flexing muscles to scare; rather than thinking hard to deliver on its presidential chores.

    But patriotic Nigerians must tell this Pharaoh: his choice is expressway to self-ruin.

  • Four soldiers, 40 others killed in Adamawa

    Four soldiers, 40 others killed in Adamawa

    •President condemns women bombers, attacks 

    President Goodluck Jonathan last night condemned the renewed Boko Haram attacks in Kano, Kaduna and Adamawa states, describing the use of woman suicide bombers as representing “a low in the inhuman campaign by the terrorists”.

    The President’s message was contained in a statement by presidential spokesman Reuben Abati.

    Bu the terrorists were unrelenting in their violence campaign as it emerged yesterday that four soldiers were killed along 40 civilians in the attacks on Garkida, Gombi Local Government Area of Adamawa State.

    The gunmen, it was gathered, attacked a military base at Garkikda, when the killings took place.

    Adamawa State Acting Governor Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri commiserated with the Lamido Adamawa, Alhaji Barkindo Aliyu Mustapha, over the incident yesterday during a Sallah visit.

    The acting governor said: “As a government, we really feel bad for the unfortunate incident which took place in your territory where four Nigerian soldiers and innocent citizens were reportedly killed by insurgents.’’

    The Army authority in Yola and the Adamawa State police confirmed the killings, but gave no further details.

    An eyewitness said: “They first struck at a military check point at our border with Borno State after  a gun battle with soldiers for almost 30 minutes. The attackers then proceeded to a nearby  village which they attacked for another half hour before entering Garkida.

    “ In Garkida, they launched attacks at the military and police bases. We are forced to stay back in our houses. Right now, I can hear heavy gunfire,” a resident said on telephone.

    Garkida is close to Agwan Alade, where armed men suspected to be members of the Boko Haram sect, waylaid the convoy of three Borno State First Class emirs, killing the emir of Gwoza.

    The town is also under Gombi Local Government Area where a German expatriate, Mr. Nitsch Eberhard, was abducted in front of his house about three weeks ago.

    The statement by the Presidential spokesman said: “President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan wholeheartedly condemns the recent terrorist attacks in Kano and Adamawa States as well as the kidnap of the Lamido of Kolofata in Northern Cameroon, Lamido Seini Lamine and the wife of the Vice Prime Minister of Cameroon.

    “The President describes as shocking, callous and reprehensible the multiple bomb blasts that occurred in Kano within 24 hours, and the unrelenting attacks by the Boko Haram at a time the Muslim faithful are observing the holy festival of Eid el Fitri.

    “He commiserates with the families of all those who lost their loved ones in the Kano and Adamawa attacks and wishes the injured speedy recovery.

    “President Jonathan further notes that the deployment of young women as suicide bombers represents a new low in the inhuman campaign by these terrorists and an expression of utter disregard for the dignity of the female gender as well as a wicked exploitation of the girl-child.

    “The President states that the abduction of the Lamido of Kolofata and the wife of the Vice premier of Cameroon clearly underscores the regional security threat that Boko Haram has become.

    “He welcomes the recent resolve by the Defence Ministers of Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Benin and Niger to further strengthen existing partnerships in order to forestall the desperate attempt by misguided elements to turn the sub-region into a battleground for terrorism and radical extremism.

    “President Jonathan urges the security forces to remain resolute, and not be discouraged by the desperation of the agents of evil.  He believes that with the continued cooperation between Nigeria’s security forces and their counterparts in neighbouring countries, the war against terror will surely be won.”

  • Needless loan

    Needless loan

    •National Assembly should turn down the $1bn request

    President Goodluck Jonathan’s impulsive concern for seeking a $1 billion (N162bn) loan to finance the war against insurgency looks more like an injudicious move. The celerity with which he wrote a letter titled: “Tackling Ongoing Security Challenges: Need for Urgent Action,” to the National Assembly seeking for approval to obtain the pointless loan is suspicious.

    What he calls the ‘essence of the loan’ is the “…need to upgrade equipment, training and logistics of our armed forces and security services to enable them more forcefully confront this serious threat.’’ He also wants a quick “….concurrence of the National Assembly for external borrowing.”

    But a frightening dimension is that this year alone, the Federal Government appropriated N968.1 billion for defence without any transparency or accountability on how the money, like the ones before it, will be spent. In the past four years, it is scandalous to note that the centre government had spent not less than $20billion on supposed fortification of the military and combat of the Boko Haram insurgents without commensurate results. Rather, the insurgents/terrorists have consistently been looming large in inflicting serious international blight on the nation while the President seems clueless about the solution to the menace.

    The military topmost hierarchy accused of graft, financial mismanagement and of grooming a highly de-motivated military is heavily relied upon by the President to curb the menace. Many pundits believe that the military assistance Nigeria is receiving from the US, UK, China, France and Israel over the bid to secure the release of over 200 abducted schoolgirls last April by Boko Haram in Chibok, Borno State, has not yielded any fruit because of endemic corruption in the military. If this latest foreign loan is approved by the National Assembly, it will only be frittered away.

    We know for instance, that the avoidable mismanagement of hitherto defence budgets had bred for the nation, an ineffective military, leading to the grave consequences of weekly bombings, generally in the northern part of the country, by Boko Haram. The Human Rights Watch, based in New York, in its recent report revealed that more than 2,000 civilians had been killed in Nigeria this year by Boko Haram.

    The deaths, which reportedly occurred in not less than 95 separate attacks in more than 70 towns and villages in the north-east, where Boko Haram launched its insurgency in 2009, could be more since killings by the insurgents have shamelessly become a routine.

    The state of emergency declared by President Jonathan in the north-east states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa last year has not achieved much. Till now, the nation is waiting with bated breath for the return of over 200 school girls abducted by Boko Haram in Chibok over 100 days ago while General Muhammadu Buhari, former Head of State and leading opposition politician narrowly escaped Boko Haram suicide bomb recently in Kaduna State.

    The proposed $1billion foreign loan is unnecessary; the fact that it is outside the framework and contemplation of the 2014 defence appropriation makes it worse. Prudent management of existing military appropriation will suffice. More importantly, the loan bid is a wrong signal to the populace that the current presidency is incapable of protecting Nigerians in their country.

    The National Assembly should turn down the President’s request for this loan because it is obvious that Nigeria can, on her own, finance the war on Boko Haram if graft holes are blocked. The loan option is not the wisest thing to do at this point in time otherwise, it would give impetus to insinuations that the ruling party wants to deploy it to prosecute its 2015 agenda.