Tag: Goodluck Jonathan

  • Human rights group faults govt on status of national confab

    Human rights group faults govt on status of national confab

    The Coalition of Human Rights Groups in Oyo State has faulted the federal government on its decision to accord the national conference an advisory status.

    Aside calling President Goodluck Jonathan to review his decision, the human rights groups also frowned at the mode of representation planned for the Conference.

    In a statement by the Chairman and Coordinator of the group, Comrades Laoye Sanda and Yomi Dawodu respectively, the coalition observed that the conference “which is supposed to produce a new constitution for the country, ought to be composed largely by ethnic nationalities. It rejected the composition of the conference which is largely by politicians and government appointees.

    The federal government had released details of the composition and status of the conference, stating that it will “advise the government on the legal framework, legal procedures and options for integrating the decisions and outcomes of the national conference into the Constitution and laws of the country.”

    On representation, the coalition observed that only 90 delegates were allocated to ‘socio-political, cultural and ethnic nationality groups. It maintained that the conference “is and should be for this category of people. As such, the number of their representation should be increased from 90 to a minimum of 200.”

    The coalition group also called for the increase in the number of those who are to represent civil rights organizations from 24 to at least 50 or 37 just as it insisted that adherents of traditional religions too should be given delegates like their Christian and Muslim counterparts.

    The human rights activists wondered why the president solely nominated delegates; saying it means that the conference is going to toe only the line charted by the presidency. This, the coalition submitted, “will defeat the very purpose of convoking the conference in the first place”.

    The coalition which recalled that the idea of National Conference was first mooted by the late President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Chief Alao Aka-Bashorun, and popularised by civil rights bodies and ethnic nationalities expressed surprise that the NBA was given only one delegate while the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) was not given any.

    “The 18 delegates meant to represent retired military and security personnel should be reduced to six since the bodies from which they retired will also have their own respective delegates.”

    The Coalition urged President Goodluck Jonathan to let the people be the determinant of their own fate rather than doctoring their views. “Otherwise, he would vindicate those who insisted that he is not sincere with the idea of convoking the National Conference.”

  • JONATHAN TO SPLASH MILLIONS ON CHAN Eagles

    JONATHAN TO SPLASH MILLIONS ON CHAN Eagles

    Players and officials who won third place for Nigeria at the 2014 CHAN in South Africa are to be get cash rewards.

    Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan will host the team at the Aso Rock Presidential Villa in Abuja on Thursday.

    MTNFootball.com has since scooped that coach Stephen Keshi will get N2m for his most recent exploits in South Africa.

    His assistant coaches will receive N1.5 million, while the players will each be N1m richer.

    The team officials will get N.5m each.

    Nigeria beat Zimbabwe 1-0 to win the third-place match in Cape Town on their debut appearance at the bi-ennial tournament reserved for players who feature in their local leagues.

  • Jonathan in Sokoto,  says PDP is party to beat

    Jonathan in Sokoto, says PDP is party to beat

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) will coast home to victory come 2015, President Goodluck Jonathan stated yesterday.

    He said the party “is the number one party in Nigeria and it would continue to be so.”

    The president spoke in the Shehu Kangiwa Square, Sokoto State where he formally welcomed former Governor Attahiru Bafarawa and his supporters to the PDP.

    In his entourage were Vice President Namadi Sambo, Senate President David Mark and National Chairman of the PDP, Adamu Mu’azu.

    Governors of Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Katsina, and Kogi states were also at the reception.

    Sambo, Mark, Mu’azu, Akpabio and the other governors echoed the unity of the PDP and their resolve to work together for success in the 2015 elections.

    Bafarawa told the president “to go and have a good sleep,” promising to deliver Sokoto State to the PDP.

    Sokoto deputy governor, Mukhtar Shagari, who is rumoured to have been promised the party’s governorship ticket, said: “Here in Sokoto, we love you and will send you back to Aso Rock in 2015.”

    But residents agonised over traffic gridlock as the ancient city was practically shut down, even long before the president’s arrival around 10am at the Sultan Abubakar 111 International Airport.

    Security operatives cordoned off major roads, leading to residents being unable to move freely.

    Spotting an overflowing white babariga, Jonathan described Bafarawa as “the political leader” of the state, stating that with his declaration for the PDP, the battle for the 2015 is won.

    According to him: “From what I know and what I have seen here today, I am convinced that in Sokoto, we are ready and just waiting for the 2015 elections.

    “Bafarawa has been your political leader. He has won all the elections and we know that when you see Bafarawa and see Mukhtar Shagari, you will know where your interest would be protected.”

    The president added that PDP has resolved “to use Sokoto as an example to show other states that PDP is still the major political party to follow.

    “We will also visit other states to showcase what the PDP government has been doing.”

  • Jonathan defends Conference

    Jonathan defends Conference

    •Council of State okays plan

    Members of the Council of State challenged President Goodluck Jonathan yesterday on the plan to pick delegates to the proposed National Conference.

    Who are the stakeholders who will nominate 282 of the 492 delegates, the President was said to have been asked.

    The former leaders also sought to know the difference between nomination by the Presidency and the Federal Government.

    Although the Council members endorsed the conference, according to sources, they advised the President to revisit the deference to “unknown or undefined stakeholders”, who will nominate delegates to the conference.

    They urged the President to avoid the nominations being hijacked by vested political interests and turning the exercise into a “Presidency-only show”.

    They said the nomination, which will take place within the next three weeks, is vital to the outcome of the conference.

    The President, who took time to rationalise the need for the conference, noted the observations of Council members and promised a tidy process, it was learnt.

    He also said his administration chose nomination because the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) said it could not conduct the election of delegates earlier than April.

    On the delay in convening the Council of State meeting, the President admitted that the timeline for holding the session was too long – in view of state matters that had been coming up.

    He bought the idea of hosting the Council meeting once per quarter and pledged to start its implementation immediately.

    According to sources, who pleaded not to be named because they are not allowed to talk to the media, the major part of the meeting at the Presidential Villa centered on the proposed National Conference.

    It was learnt that members felt nomination of 282 of the 492 delegates by undefined “stakeholders” was ambiguous.

    Those to be nominated by “stakeholders” are retired military/ security personnel(18); traditional rulers(13); retired civil servants at one per zone(six); Organised Private Sector(eight); Nigerian Youth Organisations(12); Women groups(24); political parties(10); Muslim and Christian leaders(12); Civil Society Organisations(24); Nigerians in the Diaspora(eight); People Living With Disabilities at one per geopolitical zone(six); NPAN, NGE ,NUJ and BON(eight); Socio-political/Cultural and Ethnic Nationality Groups(90); professional bodies(13); National Academies at one per Academy(six); and Former Political Office Holders(24).

    A source at the session, who spoke in confidence, said: “The Council members did not object to the National Conference, but they raised issues on the reference to stakeholders who will nominate most of the delegates.

    “They advised the President to avoid the choice of stakeholders based on partisan politics and vested interests.

    “They also sought clarification on the difference between nomination by the Presidency and the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    On nomination of conference delegates, another source said: “President Goodluck Jonathan explained that he opted for this method instead of outright election because INEC said it cannot conduct the election of delegates earlier than April.

    “He said since April will be close to some elections in 2014 and preparation for 2015 polls, he does not want to confuse the electorate. He added that he does not want Nigerians to read meanings into the intention of the Presidency.”

    Another source, who was also at the session, said: “The Council members do not want nominations to be dependent on the President and those with political interests. They do not want the National Conference turned into political patronage.

    “The President noted observations from Council members on the National Conference. He asked for the cooperation of governors who he advised to meet and coordinate nomination of ethnic nationalities and youth organisations.

    “The next three weeks will determine whether the President will heed our advice or not.”

    On other issues tabled at the meeting, a governor said: “The President briefed members of the Council on the appointment of Service Chiefs which he described as routine.

    “He also said he sent the list of Service Chiefs to the National Assembly because one civil society person went to court that the nomination process did not follow the law. So, the government decided to comply with the law.

    The President was said to have presented his list of nominees for the chairmanship of the National Population Commission (NPC).”

    On security challenges, another source at the meeting said: “The National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki, briefed the meeting on the problems and how the military and security agencies were curtailing them.

    “From his submissions, there are security challenges in all parts of the country. But he assured us that these problems are being addressed. We all pledged to cooperate with him and all agencies,” the source said.

    Speaking with reporters at the end of the meeting, Imo State Governor Rochas Okorocha said all governors threw their weight behind the national conference because it was essential that Nigerians sat and discussed about the future of the country.

    He said the All Progressives Congress (APC), his party, was yet to come up with an official position on the conference. He promised that Imo state would send its delegates to the conference.

    He also said that the Council discussed the nation’s security situation and cautioned politicians against making unguarded statements that can heighten tension and cause chaos in the country.

    Okorocha refuted claims that the APC federal lawmakers had taken instruction from the party to deliberately block the passage of the Budget.

    He explained that the directive to the lawmakers was merely to draw the attention of the Executive to issues with question marks in the budget.

    According to him, the Council agreed that all state governments are to fully participate in marking Nigeria’s 100 years anniversary.

    He said: “We deliberated on how to move the nation forward, we also discussed other national issues including the Centenary celebrations, Security matters and issues of national conference and basically how to move the nation forward.”

    “We have to adopt some new strategies on how to move the nation forward. Politician have also been warned against unguarded utterances so as not to heat up the polity. The meeting has helped to resolve a lot of issues.”

    “On centenary message, we said that Nigeria must stay together as a nation,” he added.

    Benue State Governor Gabriel Suswam said: “The president briefed us about a lot of things including the impending Conference. There were a lot of contributions and the council approved it.”

    According to him, the Council also approved a list of the new chairman and members for the National Population Commission.

    He said: “The National Security Adviser briefed us on the general security situation in the country. All members of the council contributed to the way forward and the decisions that will be taken to address some of the security issues affecting the country.”

    “The National Security Adviser said some of the unguarded statements by some prominent Nigerians are capable of inciting people, that we should be careful as major actors in the polity to avoid making some unguarded utterances that could unwittingly incite the generality of Nigerians.”

    “The council took note of that and agreed that people should be more careful about what they say as public office holders,” he stated.

     

  • ‘National Conference modalities flawed’

    ‘National Conference modalities flawed’

    Pan-Yoruba groups, comprising the Afenifere Renewal Group, Coalition of O’dua Self Determination Groups, O’dua Nationalist Coalition, Atayese and Afenifere Youth Movement, have described modalities for the proposed National Conference as “ridiculous.”

    In a statement, they said: “The nation remembers the Independence Day broadcast of President Goodluck Jonathan, which rekindled the hope for a genuine National Conference. But the proposed modality for the conference has slaughtered that hope.

    “President Jonathan promised that there would not be ‘no-go areas’ and that he will not tamper with the process. With these, Nigerians expressed the desire for a new constitution that would be ratified through a referendum. However, since the Presidential Advisory Committee on National Dialogue, led by Senator Femi Okurounmu, submitted its report, we have witnessed disappointments. We are now presented with a conference, whose modalities are incongruous with the President’s promise and the expectations that Nigerians exhibited at the public sittings.

    “Being consistent and strident advocates of a National Conference, Yoruba people expected socio-political, cultural and ethnic organisations to be the main, if not only, stakeholders at the conference, not a potpourri of “interest groups” that did not even deem it fit to make public presentations to the Okurounmu committee.

    “For example, there would be five delegates representing five national academies and we are wondering what national interest these academies are pursuing that is not already covered by their parent ministries and, by extension, the Federal Government. The President would nominate six Judiciary delegates but the Nigerian Bar Association is allowed just one delegate, while the nomination of 24 delegates is ceded to civil society groups, which have no known umbrella or regulatory body. These examples are cited without prejudice to the fact that any Nigerian is qualified to be a delegate. However, after wide consultation with our people, we have decided to continue with the same cautious optimism we expressed when this initiative was unveiled.

    “The Yoruba people will participate in the conference, believing it may be the step to take this process back to the sublime. We enjoin Yoruba individuals and groups to participate in the Yoruba Constitutional Conference on Feb 12 in Ibadan at the House of Chiefs in the Oyo State Secretariat, where we shall discuss the future of Yoruba nation and our approach to the National Conference.

    “To President Jonathan, we say that this conference will make or mar your tenure. This trend of gaining public support and losing it too quickly is becoming characteristic of this administration and he needs to consider where his allegiance lies – whether as a statesman thinking of the next generation as espoused in his Independence Day broadcast or as a politician thinking of the next election.

    “To the would-be delegates, we urge you to draw inspiration from the 55 delegates that wrote a new constitution for the United States. Nigerians have no business with poverty, unemployment, corruption, religious extremism, nepotism and other vices threatening the nation’s sovereignty. We will continue to clamour for Nigeria to be restructured into a true federal structure that will allow viable federating units to unleash their creative and developmental potential under an unfettered political structure.

    “As a people, we are ready to work with stakeholders to ensure that the conference meets the aspirations of Nigerians anchored on a new constitution. However, Yoruba people reserve the right to take our destiny in our hands, if the present effort yields no desirable fruit.”

  • Ending inter-agency rivalry among security agencies

    Ending inter-agency rivalry among security agencies

    SIR: Finally, President Goodluck Jonathan has clarified that the reason behind the replacement of service is not connected to seeming inter-service rivalry among security agencies. The media reported his remarks while commissioning the Air Force Comprehensive School in Yola, Adamawa State. He nevertheless urged a synergy among the nation’s security agencies, given that Nigeria is exposed to “cancer” of insurgency.

    Few days before the President’s visit to Yola, suspected Boko Haram members were reported to have attacked churches and mosques and killing innocent citizens in Borno and Adamawa states. The recent attacks might have been triggered to dissuade the President from visiting the home-state of his new Chief of Defence, Air Marshal Alex Badeh who is from Adamawa.

    It should also be recalled that immediately after the announcement of the new Chief of Defence Staff, the Nigerian air-force were reported to have attacked and killed a number of suspected insurgents at the Cameroonian border with Nigeria. Badeh who was former Chief of Air Staff, had promised to crush terrorists by April 2014.

    We should not lose sight of the fact that the military has so far succeeded in restricting and cornering Boko haram insurgency to few states in the North-East. Few years ago, terrorists were having field days in other parts of the country including, Kaduna, Kano, Plateau, Kogi, Niger, Sokoto and few incursions in other states including the Federal Capital Abuja.

    The Nigerian military has recorded tremendous success in its war against insurgency. The relative peace so far recorded in the troubled states of Adamawa, Borno and Yobe before the recent unfortunate development even in worship centres, is attributed to the gallantry, determination, sacrifice and relentless struggles of the Nigerian security agencies. Even though it has continued to lose its finest personnel in several coordinated attacks against terrorists, it has remained undaunted and more committed to ending acts of terrorism across the country.

    Without doubt, we still have a long way to go in banishing terrorism from our dear land. More re-organization, strategy reviews, policy alteration, shake-up, alignments and re-alignments are part and parcel of what to expect in positioning the Nigerian military for optimum performance.

    It is the wish and prayer of all Nigerians, irrespective of tribe, religious, ethnic or political aspiration for Nigeria to overcome its security challenges as soon as possible. The human and material loses so far recorded are too massive to be quiet about. We cannot continue to act as though those precious lives we keep losing in separate attacks are not precious to us. We have every reason to be worried about this sad occurrence. Every soul lost in any of these attacks should be a source of concern to any Nigerian. All the government requires of us is full time cooperation and understanding as it goes about making necessary changes in the nation’s security make-up to overcome challenges posed by insurgent groups.

    We all desire to see that peace and normalcy returns to all trouble spots across the country.

    The successes so far recorded in the war against insurgency must be sustained. We need not allow unnecessary primordial and clannish issues distract us from consolidating on the gains so far recorded. Even members of the international community are happy with Nigeria’s modest achievements in its efforts to end terrorism in the country. As Nigerian too, we should cooperate with the security agencies in providing necessary supports and information for the protection of lives and property.

    The new heads of these security establishments should seek to breakdown the wall of mutual suspicions and inter-agency rivalry among their chiefs and their personnel. They should make effort to share intelligence. They should all realize that they have common goal of ensuring that Nigeria is safe for both Nigerians and her visitors. The government should not tolerate any unnecessary competition that will bring retrogression to this country. They should work collectively in harmony to ensure that the nation overcomes her security challenges.

    • Fatima Goni

    Kofar Dukawuya, Kano

     

  • Church of England condemns anti-gay marriage law

    Church of England condemns anti-gay marriage law

    The Church of England has written to President Goodluck Jonathan, urging him to reverse the law banning same-sex marriage in Nigeria.

    It also wrote to the Primates of the Anglican churches worldwide, protesting against the anti-gay law in Nigeria and Uganda.

    The Church of England urged the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) to safeguard the interest of gays and lesbians.

    The letter was written jointly by Archbishops of Canterbury and York and addressed to President Jonathan and Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni.

    Archbishops Justin Welby and John Sentamu said the letter was a response to questions about the Church of England’s attitude to new legislation in several countries prohibiting same-sex unions.

    The Archbishops of Canterbury and York recalled the commitment by the Primates of the Anglican Communion to the pastoral support and care of everyone worldwide, regardless of their sexual orientation.

    They recalled the words in the communiqué issued in 2005 after a meeting of Primates from across the Communion in Dromantine.

    The text of the joint letter is as follows: “Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

    “In recent days, questions have been asked about the Church of England’s attitude to new legislation in several countries that penalises people with same-sex attraction. In answer to these questions, we have recalled the common mind of the Primates of the Anglican Communion, as expressed in the Dromantine Communiqué of 2005.

    “The communiqué said:

    ‘…We wish to make it quite clear that in our discussion and assessment of moral appropriateness of specific human behaviours, we continue unreservedly to be committed to the pastoral support and care of homosexual people.

    “’The victimisation or diminishment of human beings, whose affections happen to be ordered towards people of the same sex, is anathema to us. We assure homosexual people that they are children of God, loved and valued by Him and deserving the best we can give – pastoral care and friendship’.

    “We hope that the pastoral care and friendship that the Communiqué described is accepted and acted upon in the name of the Lord Jesus.

    “We call upon the leaders of churches in such places to demonstrate the love of Christ and the affirmation of which the Dromantine communiqué speaks.”

     

  • Reps approve Service chiefs’ nomination

    Reps approve Service chiefs’ nomination

    The House of Representatives has approved the nomination of the four Service chiefs submitted by President Goodluck Jonathan for confirmation.

    The nominees are: Air Marshal Alex Badeh, Chief of Defence Staff; Maj.-Gen. Kenneth Minimah, Chief of Army Staff; Rear Admiral Usman Jibrin, Chef of the Naval Staff and Air Vice Marshal Adesola Amosu, Chief of Air Staff.

    A Joint Committee of Defence, Army, Navy and Air Force submitted its report at plenary yesterday.

    It noted that the military chiefs had been found capable and suitable for tackling the security challenges confronting the country, among other responsibilities expected of them.

    Following its mandate, the joint committee met on Monday, January 27, to deliberate on the modalities for the screening. The nominated Service chiefs were invited and the appeared before the joint committee three days later.

    At the screening, the lawmakers examined the appearance, composure, presentation and the knowledge of the nominees to get a general assessment of their capabilities and suitability for the positions.

     

  • 2015: Atiku’s new calculations

    2015: Atiku’s new calculations

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has defected to the All Progressives Congress (APC). Will he revive his presidential ambition on the new platform? Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU writes on the prospects and constraints of his struggle for the Presidency.

    He is a big catch for the main opposition party, the All Progressives Congress (APC). He is not new to the platform, having worked variously with many of its national leaders, either as the Vice President, presidential candidate of the defunct Action Congress (AC) and automatic member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Board of Trustees (BoT). However, it is believed that his defection may change the permutation in the party, especially as the opposition leaders search for a credible presidential candidate.

    The odds weighed heavily against the Turaki Adamawa in the PDP. In the ruling party, he had a slim chance of survival. History is repeating itself. In 2007, he had defected to the defunct AC and emerged as its presidential flag bearer. But, he was defeated at the poll by the late President Umaru Yar’Adua. Shortly after the poll, he retraced his steps to the PDP. He attempted to mend fences with his former boss, former President Olusegun Obasanjo. But, even as the consensus candidate of the Northern establishment in the 2011 presidential elections, he could not defeat President Goodluck Jonathan.

    After the election, Atiku was sidelined by the PDP leadership. Since he has not dumped his presidential ambition, he was perceived as a threat to Dr. Jonathan. Many pro-Jonathan crusaders have branded him as the politician on the prowl, stressing that he may likely emerge as the beneficiary of the push for power shift to the North.

    The Adamawa-born politician also had a running battle with the former PDP National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, and Governor Muritala Nyako over the running of the state chapter. He had chided the former chairman for high handedness and overbearing attitude. He said Tuku’s leadership traits are offensive to democracy.

    Atiku complained that he was never carried along in the running of the party, despite the privileges conferred on him as a former Vice President by the PDP constitution. An attempt was even made to exclude his name from the list of delegates to the last national convention of the party in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory (FTC). His right was restored, following a formal complaint by him to the national secretariat. However, he parted ways with the mainstream PDP at the convention when he emerged as one of the arrowheads of the New PDP.

    The former Vice President has remained a major factor in national politics since he joined the fray in the Third Republic. He has been a consummate politician, great mobiliser, master strategist and crowd puller. In the PDP, it was believed that he was gathering forces, ahead of 2015. His associates have confided that he will renew his bid for federal power in the APC.

    Atiku’s ambition to rule the country had hit the rock four times. In the aborted Third Republic, he was projected by his mentor, the late General Sheu Yar’Adua, the founder of the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM). That was when the military leader, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, excluded him and other key politicians from the race. At the Jos convention of the proscribed Social Democratic Party (SDP), he stepped down for the late Chief Moshood Abiola, who emerged as the flag bearer.

    He had the chance in 2003. But, as his former associate, former Governor Orji Kalu of Abia State recalled, the former Vice President bungled it. That year, many governors were ready to serve as campaign managers for Atiku. They believed that, if he contested, he would beat his boss, Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo, thereby saving them from persistent persecution. But the former Vice President failed to seize the moment. At midnight, he directed his supporters, who were in the majority, to endorse Obasanjo.

    In 2007, he was not as strong as he was in 2003. Although he was more determined, the power of incumbency wielded by Obasanjo was so overwhelming. Yet, he was undeterred. In 2011, Atiku picked up the gantlet. He was on the firing line. He successfully mobilised the Northern leaders to select him as the regional candidate. But the regional support collapsed at Eagles Squares, Abuja, during the subsequent presidential primaries.

    Atiku is back in the ring at a critical point in national history. Ahead of 2015, the debate on good governance is on the front burner. The North also is intensifying its agitating for power shift, based on an inexplicable agreement on presidential zoning between President Jonathan and Northern leaders. The ruling party is in turmoil, torn apart by acrimony and intrigues.

    However, analysts contend that Atiku’s defection to the APC is not motivated by any ideological drive. Neither was the civil war in the PDP an ideological war. But, his argument is solid and convincing. “The country is in crisis and every effort must be made to rescue Nigeria”, he told reporters in Lagos. He explained that he was on tour of the six geo-political zones for consultation on the way forward. During the consultations, the options were weighed. Some of his supporters persuaded him to stay on in the PDP. But, their argument was countered by other associates who pointed out that there will be no level playing ground for ambitious party chieftains at the primaries. They reasoned that the primaries will be designed for the endorsement of President Jonathan.

    Other associates advised him to explore the possibility of nurturing the PDM. But, it was discovered that those handling the PDM project have never attempted to project the party to all the regions. Therefore, it lacks taproots across the zones. This is at variance with Atiku’s posturing as a man who has built networks across the country. Also, old PDM members are ready to discredit the platform. Last year, one of the founders, Chief Tony Anenih, the PDP BoT Chairman, said that Atiku did not have the mandate to revive the group without consultation with the surviving members. He said the former Vice President cannot single handedly transform the political group into a political party without their collective support.

    Sources close to Atiku revealed that the only option was the APC. Many APC leaders are his associates. “Having endorsed the push for democratic change in 2015, the former Vice President is not interested in polarising the rank of the opposition, whose cause he has identified with. He is putting the country first before any ambition”, added the source.

    If Atiku enters the presidential race, he will be eyeing the elusive office for the fourth time. In his first attempt, he was prompted by the late Gen. Yar’Adua. From the onset, he was an integral member of the PDM kitchen cabinet, a dependable ally of the Tafida Katsina and confidant at the birth of the Peoples Front of Nigeria (PFN). He was not in the dark when it was resolved that the political machinery should join the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP), one of the two parties decreed into existence by former military President Babangida.

    When Yar’Adua was being edged out of the presidential race, he decided to groom Atiku, his loyal associate, for the number one job. Atiku became the third SDP presidential aspirant, along with Alhaji Baba Gana Kingibe and Abiola at the Jos Convention. In those days, embattled politicians were involved in a lot of horse trading. To defeat Kingibe, Atiku was asked to step down for Abiola at the shadow poll. But a deep gulf later ensued between the Yar’Adua and Abiola. The bone of contention was Abiola’s refusal to accept Atiku as his running mate, contrary to Yar’Adua’s calculation. The 14 SDP state chairmen made it impossible by throwing their weight behind Kingibe. The loss of the two slots-Presidency and Vice Presidency was painful to Yar’Adua. The only option left for him was to gain the control of the party. He installed Anenih as the SDP national chairman. It is an irony of political life that both Anenih and Atiku, who harmoniously defended the PDM’s interest at that time, are now divided by the power games of the post-Yar’Adua period.

    After the annulment of the historic 1993 presidential election, politicians were in disarray. Yar’Adua wanted to bounce back. Atiku was part of that scramble for power as a member of the PDM in the 1994 constitutional conference set up by the late Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha. Along with Yar’Adua, he pursued the goal of setting a disengagement day for the military. Yar’Adua later died in mysterious circumstances in the prison, following his conviction over a phantom coup. After his demise, the bereaved PDM members started to look up to Atiku, the successor to the vacant stool of his mentor.

    When the former Head of State, Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar, set up a transition programme, PDM became the engine room and most formidable caucus in the PDP. Atiku worked with other members, including the late Chief Sunday Afolabi, Chief Anenih, Prof. Ango Abdullahi, Senator Jibril Martins-Kuye, Alhaji Lawal kaita, Chief Dapo Sarunmi, Chief Olorunfunmi Basorun, Chief Yomi Edu, Senator Rashidi Ladoja, Senator Tony Adefuye, Mrs. Onikepo Oshodi, Mrs. Titilayo Ajanaku, and Alhaji Abubakar Rimi, to install Obasanjo as the President in 1999.

    In 1999, Atiku dumped his presidential ambition. He returned to Adamawa State and emerged as the governor-elect. Obasanjo, the President-elect, was just floating in the PDP. He had no root. He emerged based on three factors. The North had reluctantly conceded the Presidency to the Southwest. Some Northern elements believed that, when he was the military Head of State, he did not work against the interest of the region. Also, the military wanted to remain as a factor and power broker. No other Yoruba man could be trusted, since Chief Olu Falae refused to join the PDP.

    Obasanjo did not have any blue-print. PDM members-Atiku, Afolabi, Sarunmi and Edu-were part of the numerous delegations asking him to return to power. Obasanjo had a nightmare selecting a running mate. Four names were presented to him-Rimi, Bamanga Tukur, Prof. Abdullahi and Atiku. He settled for Atiku because of the PDM’s influence.

    As the Vice President, Atiku was the de facto President. He was the Controlling Minister of the Economy. To get things done, politicians and others must pass through Atiku route. The former Vice President was also popular among the governors. Thus, in 2003, many of them urged him to displace Obasanjo. The President was sweating profusely at the primaries. He prostrated before Atiku before earning re-nomination. At that point too, Atiku ceased to be the apple of Obasanjo’s eye.

    Henceforth, the former Vice President was under security watch. He was accused of corruption and disloyalty. He became a nominal figure in the government with no duties to perform. The government even made frantic efforts to cripple him politically. But Atiku ran to the court for security and survival. The former Vice President enjoyed tremendous goodwill as the AC presidential candidate. However, after the election, he returned to the PDP. The move embarrassed the AC leadership. Other PDP defectors and associates of Atiku, including Kaita and Ghali Umar Naa’ba, fired salvos at the party, saying that it was not different from the PDP. But Atiku also took other steps. He ran to Abeokuta to make peace with his estranged boss, Obasanjo. It was to be a secret fence-mending meeting. But, coming out of the meeting, an embarrassed Atiku was accosted by many reporters. The former President yelled at his visitor. Irked by the turn of events, former Abia State Governor Kalu chided Atiku for the wrong step. The reconciliation was not fruitful. It did not lead to any renewal of contact. When the former Vice President indicated unfolded his plan to contest for the Presidency in 2011, Obasanjo laughed mischievously. “I dey laugh o”, he said. It was loaded with meanings. Indeed, Obasanjo joined forces with President Jonathan to abort Atiku’s dream. When Atiku was tearing the record of the President at the primaries, Obasanjo stood up and whispered some words into the President’s ears. Atiku lost.

    Last year, at a public lecture at Ibadan, Oyo State capital, Obasanjo castigated Atiku. He said he refused to hand over to him because he could not vouch for him.

    Now that Atiku is back to the progressive fold, what are his chances? A source said that he needs to reconcile with former AC leaders in the APC, who may be weary of his style. Many of them have described him as an inconsistent politician, who jumped the ship after losing the presidential election.

    With the defection of the former Vice President, APC now has six presidential aspirants. They are Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Senator Bukola Saraki, Kano State Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, and Sam Nda-Isaiah.s

     

  • Senate begins ministerial  screening today

    Senate begins ministerial screening today

    The Senate will today begin the screening of ministerial nominees.

    This is contained in the Senate Order Paper circulated yesterday by the Chairman of its Committee on Rules and Business, Ita Enang.

    The confirmation listed against the name of the Senate Leader Victor Ndoma-Egba, said: “That the Senate do consider the request of Mr President, Commander-in-Chief, on the confirmation of nominees for appointment as ministers of the government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

    It said the confirmation was in accordance with Section 147(2) of the 1999 Constitution.

    President Goodluck Jonathan forwarded the names 12 ministerial nominees to the Senate for confirmation.

    Some senators are said to be preparing to block the confirmation of the nominees.