Tag: hate

  • Hate is a polished tomb

    Hate is a polished tomb

    Hate seems like other people’s torment until it growls in you. Sometimes, it glowers in the eyes of a bigot and the scowl of a predator. Sometimes, it seethes in the quiet glances of their prey.

    These days, it shrieks in the rant of the Nigerian wild – our virtual wilderness to be precise. Here, we relive the infernal crud of frantic personae: the political animal, apolitical pacifist, hyperbolic ‘influencer,’ data-fabulous millennial, and the defiant Gen Z, scud to the shore of national consciousness on the world wide web – all hoisting tribal banners and interests. 

    Whatever the bent of their politics, they cuddle one prejudice and cringe from the other as their vanities dictate. Such is the tenor of political correctness that has seen many clash in defence and furtherance of random bigotries or a desperate demagogue. Journalists, activists, rights activists, and failed political aspirants afflict our social space like pitiless hooligans.

    They mistake lava for wit and molten banality for intellect. Their voices weigh like a thundercloud; whether debating celebrity scuffles or their political preferences, their passions sparkle and flit from fetid intelligence to brilliant witlessness.

    There is a cult of ignorance knifing through Nigeria right now, ripping all that should bind us apart – particularly in cyberspace. This cult thrives on anti-intellectualism and base sophistry – derogatorily dismissed as otellectualism in Yoruba parlance, to connote the presumed intellectual’s acquiescence to be corrupted by what the Yoruba term as ‘ote’ translatable as ‘perfidy’ or ‘treachery.’

    This strain of anti-intellectualism  rifles through our sociopolitical and cultural lives, nurtured by the false notion that the freedom of speech means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge’ or that ‘my malevolence is just as good as your benevolence.’

    The malady manifests in cyberspace in real time. In this public space, everybody becomes a wilding, trading bitter realism, infantile whim, and pseudo-idealism with awful relish.

    The guts and sinews of every stereotype and theme-park hatred are validated via mind-numbing sloganeering, toxic bigotries, sophistry, and outright lies.

    A casual visit to Facebook or Twitter manifests as a pilgrimage; the esplanades of public discourse unfurl to a sordid, cutout version of anarchic thinking, replete with ethnoreligious bigotries and the hassle of incomprehensible logic. Then, there are the strange movements and morbid ideologies – all fostered and marshalled from bizarre platforms.

    In this public wilderness, everybody pontificates. Everyone mutates from philosopher to savage pawn and vice versa; they all speak impressive and atrocious lingo. Call it our patois of rebuke and immoderate assemblies.

    Read Also: Atiku, Obi and fellow election deniers

    En route to the 2023 elections, we encountered Nigerians of vast mental stripes in our social space: the BATIFIED, ATIKULATE, AND OBIDIENT. Once you get past the facade of slogans and artifice, it’s mostly the same defiant, virulent passion driving the mob.

    Even after the elections, the bickering persists. We see the savage mutations of the political Nigerian: persons of presumed higher learning, persons afflicted by poverty, persons of affluence, authority, and high glamour. The lambent complexion turns muddy. The aura vanishes. Integrity is innately borne and espoused as a kernel of character but respect is a gift under no one’s control. It peaks and ebbs as spectator mood at a crunch soccer tie.

    A familiar decline from admiration to disillusion, hope to disenchantment festers in the citizenry’s public engagement with one another and their elected representatives.

    Our greatest undoing, however, would be our inability to douse the flames of hatred incited by our bigotries and cutthroat politics; post-2023 election, our politics must be rid of rancour. There is no excuse for maligning an individual, group, or social divide for their political choices at the just concluded elections.

    Where such mayhem subsists,  everybody gets burnt: the ruling class, opposition parties, the entitled elite, and the wealthy upper class. At the bottom of the cauldron, however, roasts the incorrigible hordes of the boondocks, or ‘base’ electorate if you like.

    Through the inferno and chaos, we must seek a redefinition of the Nigerian patriot. We must learn from the chaos overseas. Again, I reiterate that Nigerians learn from the Afghan experience. In the wake of the United States-backed NATO’s sudden withdrawal from Afghanistan, Gaisu Yari, an Afghan refugee, now grantee of the Open Society Foundation (OSF), recalls his flight from his homeland as his darkest hour.

    As the U.S. and NATO commenced their hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan, he had just four hours to pack up every personal item in his apartment. He had to decide, without wasting time, what to take and what to leave behind—knowing that he might never see anything left behind again.

    “One rule kept circling through my mind: Pack the life you have created here in Afghanistan into one suitcase and never forget the dreams of the people of this land,” he recalled.

    Thus in barely four gruesome hours, he anxiously stuffed a few belongings in his bag and parted with his life, his work, and everything that made him Afghan. In a pain-filled memoir, Yari revealed that he cried all through his perilous trip to the Kabul airport. He hadn’t enough time to say goodbye to loved ones.

    And as much he tried to conjure ways to plan, resist, and fight to stay in Afghanistan, with each passing moment, ”it became gut-wrenchingly evident that we had lost our chance,” he said.

    One year after his painful departure from his homeland, Yari relives the agony of his flight; he relives the pain of saying goodbye to his tearful mother on the roof of an old house, where he had been hiding from the Taliban for three days.

    He eventually evacuated to Poland, landing with his family in a refugee camp with scarce food or resources. Even so, Yari is luckier than fellow refugees and Afghans who fled to Poland, France, Canada, and the U.S. At least, he enjoys the momentary boon of an OSF grant thus he might not have to really worry anymore about the quality of his provisions, living space, and food supplies.

    Yet every day he rues the misery of refugee life, the pain of sudden flight, those stolen moments with his mom, and the aching feeling of being abandoned.

    Every new dawn he spends abroad lacerates him to the bones and leaves a thick welt on his psyche. He realises that he is living some of his “darkest days a year after leaving” his homeland.

    Would Nigerians learn from the sad fate of the Yaris of the world?  Yari and fellow Afghan refugees never imagined that their country ”could fall back into the hands of the Taliban—and that no one could save it.” 

    As they fled, many of them took with them, what they thought was important. “A prosecutor told Yari in his OSF-sponsored documentary, “Afghan Voices” that he brought his  knowledge and experience to the U.S. “But does that matter here in the United States? No,” he said. Quite instructive.

    And despite their initial patronage by the bleeding heart  Western press, Afghanistan has faded from global news headlines.

    As we heal from the 2023 elections, let us be guided by the Afghans’ experience. Nigerians must desist from rancorous engagement with each other.

    We must scorn chaos and poisonous interventions by aliens, whose major interest is to abolish our sovereignty, plunder our resources, and strip us bare to devious elements.

  • Between love and hate

    Between avid love and scalding hate, there is but a thin line!  Nothing reinforces this delicate but fatal slip more than reported cases of lovers, sentenced to hang, because they killed girlfriends, or even wives, they once doted on.

    An Ondo State high court just sentenced one Chukwudi Onweniwe to hang for, two years ago, strangling his undergraduate girlfriend, the late Nifemi Adeyeoye, then an HND student of Rufus Giwa Ploytechnic, Owo.  Nifemi, the victim’s name, is rather evocative.  “Nifemi” is Yoruba for “love me”, a plea for love, or more emphatically, an assurance of love.  Love is life and peace and bliss. But alas in this case, love turned fatal!

    Another reported fresh sentence was the one involving the murder of the daughter of a former deputy governor of Ondo State.  The victim and murderer were said to have been in a four-year tryst; broke off for some time, but after resumed their romance.  The girl was also reported to be a student of Adekunle Ajasin University, (AAU), Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State.

    But again, an expected sweet tryst turned sour and gory.  Her boyfriend was said to have killed her, shaved her skull and pubic hair (reportedly for money rituals), dug a shallow grave right inside the room where she was killed, buried her and cemented the shallow grave to block any trace — Lord have mercy!

    But the foul ooze from the room gave away the secret.  The boyfriend was reported to be involved in some Yahoo-Yahoo money ritual, of which his former lover was a gory victim!  For his brazen crime, he will also hang.

    Still, what would make someone who professes love for another, to end his lover’s life in such a callous, grisly manner?  Free-wheeling crime?  Mad love for money?  Or plain stupidity that he can get away with the crime?

    It’s even more puzzling for spouses that had tied the nuptial knots, sworn to living for better and for worse, but reported to have killed or seriously armed one another, this time with wife either killing the husband, or the husband killing the wife.

    Beyond crime and punishment, given how rampant what Hardball would call “love crimes” have become, perhaps the Nigerian state should take that extra steps to probe into those hearts of darkness, that see nothing but death and torture from love.

    It’s such a great contradiction in terms that maybe a branch  of psychiatry could do serious clinical probes into such cases.  God is love.  Love is life.  Romance is sheer paradise on earth, at least for the pleasure-seeking.  Even the stoic can do with a little love, to cushion his proverbial stamina to endure.

    But when love turns to hate; and delivers cruel deaths?  Crime and punishment isn’t enough!  High time science proves into this anomaly, to save future victims.

  • Media scholars advocate self-regulatory system against hate speech

    Media scholars advocate self-regulatory system against hate speech

    Media scholars have advocated the need to put in place a self-regulatory system and intensify activities aimed at sensitising the media community about the industry standard to avoid high-level of hate speech and partisanship in the coverage of election.

    Speaking at a Media Project Stakeholders Meeting organised by the Institute for Media and Society (IMS) as part of the support to the media component of the European Union (EU) Support to Democratic Governance in Nigeria Project, Executive Director of Media Rights Agenda Edetaen Ojo said there is a consensus that there were disturbing levels of hate speech and partisanship in the coverage of the 2015 elections by many media outlets.

    He said since then, no concerted effort has been made to address the problem, although various government officials and other stakeholders have repeatedly expressed concern about the challenge posed by hate speech to both the electoral process and public discourse.

    He said: “There is a risk that if the media community does nothing to address this problem, government could take legislative measures in response and this would most likely be in the form of criminal law.

    “In order to address this problem and other breaches of professional standards ahead of the 2019 elections, the media community should make efforts to put in place a self-regulatory system and intensify activities aimed at sensitising the media community about the industry standard.

    “I believe that there is a move to update the Nigerian Media Code of Election Coverage that was developed ahead of the 2015 elections to make it more comprehensive.  I am in complete support of such an effort.

    “A major challenge with the Nigerian Media Code of Election Coverage was that it was developed too close to the 2015 elections as a result of which not much could be done to familiarise media practitioners with the contents and standards contained in the Code. It was therefore not possible to fully apply the Code in the context of the 2015 elections and to assess its effectiveness.

    “The media community, which collaborated to develop that Code, now needs to urgently revise and update it so that the final document can be read far ahead of the 2019 elections and the necessary sensitisation carried out.”

  • PDP must avoid hate languages in 2019, says Makarfi

    PDP must avoid hate languages in 2019, says Makarfi

    •’Party confident of victory next year’

    Former Acting Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Caretaker Committee Chairman Senator Ahmed Makarfi has advised the party not to repeat the mistakes it made in the build-up to the 2015 general elections, if it is to dislodge the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC ) in 2019 election.

    Makarfi linked some of the reasons why the PDP lost the presidency to the use of hate languages against opponents in the build-up to the election.

    This, he said, caused dissatisfaction among the party members that came from the section of the country against which the hate speeches were directed.

    Makarfi, who is a former Kaduna State governor, spoke in Lagos at the weekend, where he met selected print media reporters.

    He said: “The language used by the PDP handlers was not polite during the campaign. The manner with which some of our members campaigned during the 2015 general elections maligned the opposition candidate. You know a section of the country felt foul languages were being used on them. People, who are members of the party from the region felt let down and they became indifferent.”

    The PDP chieftain said former President Goodluck Jonathan’s campaign handlers sidelined the party structure during the electioneering.

    Rather than engage party members across the states, Makarfi said Jonathan’s campaign floated Transformation Agenda of Nigeria (TAN) to run the campaign independent of the party structure.

    He said: “Another reason the party failed was that, our structure from the national down the line was not used for the campaign. Rather, an ad hoc arrangement in the name of TAN was used for the presidential campaign. And TAN was just a body promoted by some people to impress those in power. It was not something structured; but PDP is structured from national to the ward level.

    “To abandon that asset (party structure) and use something superficial, there will naturally be problems, because you discouraged people from participating and people became nonchalant and uninterested. Some governors were not even aware of how campaign was going on. Coordinators were appointed in their states without even knowing. No governor was in the campaign council. The Chairman of PDP Governors’ Forum was not in the presidential campaign council.”

    Makarfi said he was confident that the PDP would return to power in 2019, saying the “lackluster performance” of President Muhammadu Buhari had made it easy for the PDP to return to power and give the country the required leadership.

    The PDP leader also said there was no deliberate effort by party leadership to marginalise its members from the Southwest during its national congress last December, saying lack of consensus among the members from the region led to their misfortunes after the congress.

    “Nobody directed the North to meet and maintained what they had zoned. As the chairman then, I didn’t ask them. It was not in my position to say so and nobody also stopped the South from meeting to agree. Failure to agree was what made the contest to be thrown open. Southwest was divided during the congress; they campaigned against each other. In politics, when you are campaigning against each other, you don’t expect the rest to give you leadership,” Makarfi said.

  • From hate to love

    Dupe and Sesan were both as different as chalk and cheese. She had grown up in an orthodox, aristocratic family, proud of their tradition and lineage. Sesan on the other hand grew up in a laid-back Christian household. Her mother and father were her source of pride and she saw almost everything from their perspective. These two lovebirds met in their university during their post graduate studies in Arts department and it started first as friendship and then Cupid’s arrow brought them to the affectionate corridor.

    Scroll back down memory lane and you discover how hate melted into love. When Dupe first ran into this handsome dude at the fresher’s party, she didn’t even like his attitude.  He was in the company of her school mate who introduced him briefly as her cousin. For the first ten minutes, they argued over every topic and she vowed never to have anything to do with this guy again. She thought he was too cavalier and he thought she was not in touch with reality.

    Interestingly, fate had other plans for them. Alphabetically destined together, Dupe and Sesan ended up sitting next to each other in class the following week. How was she going to handle this guy? Should she move away and find a better space? Well, something told her not to worry and just be herself. He was in a better mood or could it be that he had repented.

    Two weeks after that encounter, he also began to view her differently and they got closer and closer. She had never been so happy in her life. Everything about him was strange, different and exciting, waiting to be explored. He was so mysterious and yet so loving, and she couldn’t wait to spend the rest of her life with him.

    Dupe and Sesan were as unlike as it could get. They were undeniably different. Their backgrounds, their upbringing, their culture, and their outlook towards life were all different. But though poles apart, it seemed like the magnetic laws were soon to start applying to them. The force of attraction was too strong to repel. They were soon quite inseparable. Most times, you do not really know who a person is until you give them a chance.  At such moments, the adventurous side plays itself out and you can be sure to drink from the stream of love if you play your cards well.

    Of course, we all know that there are times when you put in so much and all you get is rejection. At such moments, all you need is to get a substitute and make yourself happy. Rejection doesn’t feel great and sometimes it feels unfathomable but it shouldn’t be something you allow to take away happiness from your life. The suffering that happens when rejection occurs comes from over-thinking the “loss” that you feel you are suffering.

    The reality of life is that rejection will form a part of it––there will be occasions when your date request will be rejected by someone, somewhere. It is a healthy attitude to accept that rejection is a part of life and to acknowledge that what really matters is finding the way to bounce back and try again. The truth of the matter is that, it is normal to feel bad, so don’t try to bottle up your disappointment and sadness.

    It is, however, better not to allow yourself to feel this way for too long. If you do not move away from being a sinking heart, then you may risk colouring your future emotional endeavours with a negative impression.

    You may also seek the help of a counsellor when you cannot handle it alone. Experts believe that you can open the window (s) of emotional possibilities with a loving and caring attitude towards your partner. In addition to all these, you also need to be thoughtful about the things that would captivate the one you adore as well as make him or her shed tears of affection and joy.

    You can put in extra effort and do everything that you have always imagined about your dream partner to the one that you finally find yourself entangled with for life. All you need to do is an ’emotional transfusion’. This is a situation where you do everything on your affectionate list to the other person without holding anything back.

    Just give and give as much as you can and somehow you would discover that you are going to derive joy doing this too. By making someone happy, you are investing happiness for yourself too and before you know it, it would be time to reap these emotional seeds in thousands. It is important to do this as often as you can and you can be sure of a great transformation in your relationship.

    If the challenge that you were experiencing was from your partner, then you are going to find that your partner will now become more caring, loving and thoughtful towards you. Here, you would find that the energy of your unselfish acts resonates in the loving space of your partner.

  • On this bloodied canvas of hate…

    The mutilated bodies, now beyond count, continue to mount in hundreds in mass graveyards scattered across the land. You ask what could have sparked this spasm of violent rage and you are confronted with dozens of logic-confounding reason. Sometimes you wonder if anyone remembers that the casualties in those lonely pits were once living human beings and not just mere disposable items. Untimely deaths have become so cheap that we hardly care anymore. In most of the cases, those that were mauled to death in dozens didn’t even know they qualify to be targets for murderous genocide and hate killings. Yes! Those are the realistic, though grim, words that many hesitate to use. Some would rather call it ‘a reprisal’ or simply tag it ‘herdsmen attack’. With that, they attempt to cover up the grave and odious mercilessness as a simple tactless fight perpetrated by some folks whose blind affinity to vengeful reprisal demands that we should get used to this endless spate of disruption of communal living in some parts of the country. But that is simplistic and jejune. When you check the records, you will come to the shocking reality that this regime of bloodletting is more than just a happenstance. It is cold and calculated; it is more of a well-orchestrated execution by armed, experienced and truly audacious militia that feasts on innocent blood. The more they kill, the deadlier they become and curiously, they hardly ever pay for it before the law. And so, a land once brimming with the innocence of childish love and affection is now roiling with deadly silence on a canvas of bile and blood.

    And, as it was the norm in the better-forgotten days of Goodluck Jonathan, we are back to offering platitudinal condolences whenever scores of our fellow citizens get mauled to death in their sleep as it happened in an Internally Displaced Persons camp, Nkiedonwhro village, Plateau State, recently. With 29 inmates becoming the latest victims of the mindless killings by the faceless marauders called herdsmen, the ‘oohs’ and ‘eeyahs’ have resonated over the land. And, as usual, we fleetingly mourn the dead as we continue with the normal business of quotidian survival. After all, the living must move on while the dead should be allowed to go rest in peace. That is the cold mindedness that has fostered this heartless spate of endless killings. We rarely pause to ask the hard questions. We are content with listening to the Federal Government’s repeatedly silly and moronically monotonous explanation that most of the killings were the handiwork of migrant herdsmen from the Chad Basins and other lands who wantonly roam unchallenged all over our blessed country on a divine cause of finding food for their cattle. Could that, I ask, be a logical explanation for the gloom they randomly inflict on this land at every turn of domestic scuffle over a helpless farmer’s land? Must the killings continue as a confused government helplessly wrings its lifeless hands in clear portrayal of its resolve for the pathetic surrender of its statutory responsibility of protecting citizens’ lives while terrorists and their cattle roam the land?

    Terrorists? Yes, that’s what they are. You do not whip some errant ‘freedom fighters’ in the South-East part of the country into that line and paint confirmed killers, sadistic rapists and violent cattle rustlers with another brush. It was that bad that, earlier this year, the Senate took a strong position on the activities of these murderous lot, charging the Federal Government to deal decisively with the culprits as their modus operandi was not different from that of the Boko Haram terrorists. In fact, the Global Terrorism Index ranked this group of dangerous murderers whom we flippantly refer to as herdsmen as the “fourth deadliest terrorist group in the world after the Boko Haram insurgents, ISIS and Al-Shabab.” And it is not by mere accident or coincidence that these findings are backed up with gory details of the senseless killings perpetrated by the group, especially in Nigeria.

    A report compiled by Clifford Ndujihe in a national daily in June, this year should send shivers down the spines of concerned citizens both in and outside the government because of the sheer number of deaths and havoc that this breed of questionably privileged cattle farmers have wrought on the psyche of a nation wallowing in self-deceit that the situation is not as bad as some of us paint it. In a country with an abysmal score in record-keeping, Ndujihe noted that, between January 2016 and June, 2017, what we had on our hands was a harvest of deaths in genocidal proportion.

    Some details would suffice: “Four districts in Kafanchan LGA namely: Linte, Goska, Dangoma and Kafanchan town recorded 194 deaths while Chikun LGA recorded about 10 deaths, making a total of 204.  80 were sent to early graves in Ukpabi Nimbo community in Uzo-Uwani local council of Enugu State in 2013 while the death toll rose to 1,229 in 2014. Add that to the number of deaths in 2016 and 2017 where an additional 50 people were murdered in the first week of January at Udeni Ruwa, in Nassarawa State and 45 were killed in Agatu, Benue State. On January 17, 2016, three people were killed in Gareji village in Taraba State while on January 23, 2016, between 30 and 60 people including a police DPO were killed in Demsare, Wunamokoh, Dikajam and Taboungo, of Adamawa State. In February 2, 2016, seven people were killed in a dawn attack in Agatu and on February 7, 2016, 10 people were killed in Tom Anyiin. Four days later on February 11, two people were killed in Abbi, Enugu State and some declared missing. On February 24, 2016, between 300 and 500 Nigerians were killed in Agatu followed by the killings of February 28, 2016 in which nine people were killed in Agatu. The reported figures are believed to be a mere fraction of what is going on.

    To show that the menace is national in outlook contrary to an earlier belief that the clashes occur within a certain geo-political area between cattle farmers and crop farmers, there were records of the killings in Ndokwa, Delta State; Ohali-Elu in Rivers State; Ilado in Ondo State where a prominent Nigerian, Chief Olu Falae, was abducted by herdsmen in April 9, 2016; killings in Angai, Dashole and Mesuwa in Taraba State; Dungun Mu’azu community in Sabuwa Local Government Area of Katsina; Demsa Local Government Area of Adamawa State; Rafin Gona and Gbagyi villages in Bosso local government area of Niger State; and there was the January 17, 2017 killings in Samaru Kataf market in Zango-Kataf Local Council of Kaduna State. In short, this list is endless and the latest killings in Plateau State merely add to the number.

    Now, you ask, does it mean that the authorities have not been doing anything other than sitting on their hands while these armed men go on their usual killing spree? No. The authorities, to the best of my knowledge, have been barking orders from days immemorial. It is just that no one knows if the orders are backed with the right political will that would awaken the conscience of those who have chosen to sleep on their guns in the barracks. What scares is the brazen gusto with which these killers operate even in communities where soldiers were deployed to provide security as it happened in the Nkiedonwhro IDP camp where the victims were expectedly under the protective shield of the state. The story is almost the same in Kaduna State where, in spite of the large presence of the military, dastard killings were still being perpetrated at a point in time. You just wake up to the sad news of another round of deaths in the most bizarre fashion.

  • No to hate speech, yes to restructuring!

    Those who governed well did not arm, those who were armed well did not set up battle lines, those who set up battle lines well did not fight, those who fought well did not lose, and those who lost well did not perish – Zhuge Liang, third century.

    It was the legendary essayist C.P. Scott who once wrote that ‘Comment is free, but facts are sacred’. This statement has endured over the years as the strategic point of reference for free speech and indeed free press in a democracy and it will continue to underscore the way individuals and political leaders conduct themselves in the public arena. However, recent hate speeches, messages and comments coming from the perfidious and distressed leaders of political parties, pseudo – intellectual analysts, ethnic extremists and the media is disquieting and awkward at this time of our nation-building efforts.

    Today, the traditional and social media is being used by mischief-makers, conceited individuals and ethnic organisations across the political divide to threaten and taunt us with footage of their most horrendous and atrocious acts of communication barbarity and hateful messages.  Nevertheless, in my view, the most difficult new element is the attraction that a tiny but relevant majority of Nigerians have seen this hate speech to the point that they are ready to internalize the messages as true and sacrosanct. Therefore, it will require a much more difficult and long-term effort to win back the hearts and minds of people that today seek to destroy the society because of their selfish desires. Equally worrisome, is the government disregard for structured national debates and dialogue to unveil strategy and action plans to resolving the knotty issues of fiscal federalism, constitutional reforms, justice and transparency, which are the hallmarks of sustainable democracy.

    This article draws attention to a few of the complex interrelated issues of hate speech and propaganda rather than the fundamental issues of nation- building and the uncensored social media rape on our collective consciousness as people and a nation. The challenges ahead in my view are undeniably serious for our democratic enterprise and the likely fall-out of uncontrollable hostility cannot be ruled out and as people we must be vigilant not truncate this democratic milestone.

    For the avoidance of doubt, hate speech is one which attacks a person or group based on label, ethnicity, gender or religious persuasion. It can be propagated through spoken words, gesture or conduct, writing, or display, which, is forbidden in many countries because it incites violence or prejudice against a group or individual based on their membership of the group.

    While there is unprecedented interest in the devolution of power, fiscal federalism and restructuring and the fundamental rights of every Nigerian to defend their democratic principles and values as well as the expressions of solidarity for a better country, we should walk and speak cautiously and avoid the bullish media manipulations and the outward show of shame that has characterised the conversations for true federalism so far.

    Most nerve-racking of all in my view is the increasing socio-political affectation from the various ethnic groups and the untamed falsehood resonating from press releases, interviews, conferences and indeed the town hall meetings by their narrow-minded leaders and obscure supporters which can only predict trouble for the nation.

    Sadly, content analysis of the Nigerian media particularly newspapers could easily leave one with the impression of extreme anxiety by our leaders and the political culture of improbability that is evolving and the half-hearted speeches of a do or die restructuring that is spreading like harmattan fire and it is likely to consume us as a nation if self-regulation is not brought to bear in our national dialogue and conversations.

    Therefore, going forward, we must draw insights and lessons from other jurisdiction like Ethiopia. It is instructive to note that in 1996, the 14 historical provinces of Ethiopia were dissolved and nine autonomous regions and two chartered cities – Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa were created to replace them. Six of these regions are inhabited almost entirely by a single ethnic group each, with the three remaining regions more ethnically diverse. The federal authorities deal with issues of national concern, including economic and social development, national standards and policy criteria for health and education, defence, federal police, foreign policy, foreign commerce, and immigration. Therefore, the renewed calls of restructuring of the Nigeria state is a welcome development but a workable document, must be brought to the table and each groups canvass critical positions for the creation of autonomous regions in line with resource endowment and homogenous ethnic group through referendum, which is not in  the 1999 constitution.

    Disappointedly, the leadership at all levels in my view has not set the moral, ethical, social, motivational climate in their narratives and blueprint to earn the untainted trust of the average Nigerian. What is more is that their actions and inactions do not reflect the moral and reputational compass that we required as a people to retool this great nation.

    Besides, the quality of message, resources and presentation skills of what constitute the critical milestone for nation-building are totally absent from their body language and utterances. Reasonably, there are institutional frameworks and conference reports irrespective the conveners that address the core issues of our nationhood. Therefore, it is expedient that we adopt citizens’ diplomacy to lobby and take steps as pressure groups through the National Assembly to do needful.

    Pointedly, one of the damaging impact of hate speech on good governance will be the erosion of social and moral fabric of the Nigerian society which will weaken institutions, undermine leadership competency, accommodation of alternative views, diversity of opinions and more importantly, mediocrity is sacrificed at the negative altar of representation by constituent parts which has been one of the bane nation-building efforts in Nigeria.

    All things considered, the radicalization of the traditional and social media space and the complex phenomenon of Nigerians embracing subtle but radical ideology of ethnicity and hate, which are very disturbing trends,  must be checked, by deliberate and a sustained national conversations that put the nation above all interest and the time is now!

     

    • Orovwuje is founder, Humanitarian Care for Displaced Persons, Lagos.
  • PFN urges tribal leaders to eschew hate speech

    The Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) has called on the political class and tribal leaders to eschew hate speeches if they want a strong, virile and united Nigeria.

    It said it was important for all Nigerians to imbibe and adopt the spirit of selfless life for the purpose of moving the nation forward.

    National President of PFN, Reverend Felix Omobude, who stated this in his Sallah message, urged the Muslim faithful to demonstrate the virtues of love and sacrifice which are the hallmarks of the Eid-El-Kabir festival.

    Dr. Omobude’s Sallah message, which was contained in a press statement endorsed by his media aide, Deacon Ralph Okhiria, enjoined the adherents of Islam to be obedient to God by showing love towards one another.

    According to the statement, “The two holy books (the Bible and the Koran) talk about sacrifice. Therefore, we should be ready at all times to sacrifice for one another, irrespective of our religious affiliations, and also to make the desired sacrifices for the peace, growth and development of Nigeria.

    “With fervent prayer and love, Nigerians can live together in peace as brothers and sisters, and contribute to the progress and unity of the country.

    “It is important for all Nigerians to imbibe and adopt a spirit of living a selfless life for the purpose of moving our great nation forward.”

  • Hate speech: We must be careful

    SIR: When reasonable avenues are opened for people to express themselves without fear or unnecessary gagging, inherent inferences are drawn from contending national issues for immediate resolutions. However, when political leaders become ‘know-it-all’ and hence become acutely intolerant to differing opinions, emotions and angers of people are bottled-up overtime and later explode to social imbroglios and national calamity.

    In a nation where the political class is swimming in affluence and the downtrodden masses are further confined to the state of irrecoverable poverty, there is bound to be hate speech. Also, when youths/graduates are massively unemployed, under the nasty grip of hunger and starvation, hate speech cannot be ignored. When people have lost hope in the system because of adventures of leaders, hate speech cannot be ignored. Hence, our political leaders are encouraged to uplift our nose-diving welfare through realistic dividends of democracy and not degrade it through selfish pursuits.

    The question is: what is the government doing convincingly to mitigate present prevalent poverty and hunger among her citizens? What is the strategy to turn around the skewed vice of illegal wealth accumulation among political leaders that has become the basis of massive corruption, kidnapping for ransom, ritual killings, internet frauds, political killings, etc.?

    It is an irony that our so called-leaders are now considering hate speech as a national aberration when some of them got to power through spiteful actions/statements against other political contenders. What will they do to dubious leaders (among them) who were involved in looting the pubic treasury in plainly crude and intelligent manner? Is the law against hate speech an ideal panacea to resolving its causal factors? Ideally, there should be proper penalties to sanction political leaders who siphoned our resources, demeaned our society and brought us to this hateful condition. A reasonable law should also suffice to deter political leaders from siphoning our collective resources and further confining the poor masses to the bay of suffering and hopelessness.

    No individual, group, press, association, etc., should be gagged from saying or writing or dissemination obvious truths in whatever manner that they deem proper through draconian law.

    The strategic inducement of fear to dampen legal complaints of poor people and their quests for reliable political change will not work under a polity universally acknowledged as politically-heated. We must prevent utopianism in power that can lead to display of absolute power. Dubious hijackers of electioneering process for selfish gains, mandate grabbers and political marauders desperately lusting after self-succession or sit-tight in power must be checked by ‘Eagle Eyes’ of watchful Nigerians.

     

    • Akinniyi Joseph Akinwumi,

    Lagos.

  • Mr. Osinbajo, shall we now treat ‘hate governance’ as terrorism?

    As Acting President, Yemi Osinbajo mustered a pious parallel to Nigeria’s cult worship of deviltry and vile. But despite his affectation of innate rebellion against the hateful and vile, Nigeria drowns in the flood of his expendable truths.

    Hate speech is terrorism, according to Osinbajo. Thus while his boss, President Muhammadu Buhari, enjoyed medical tourism abroad, and ‘poor’ Nigerians cowed from a vicious health system, the hatred and savage antics of separatists from the north and southeast, Osinbajo ignited the dying embers of his government’s resolve, into a fierce fire.

    As Acting President, Osinbajo spat fire in measured cadence. Perhaps he meant to scald, among other ills, Biafran separatist and hatemonger, Nnamdi Kanu and his kindred spirits in the northern Arewa youth group.

    Perhaps not. But when Osinbajo declared that those found to be promoting hate speech would be treated as terrorists, discerning folk at home and abroad, rejoiced that it was only a matter of time before Nigeria’s merchants of odium and grief, scalded in then Acting President, Osinbajo’s anti-hate speech inferno.

    But for all his bluster, his fire is tame; like  the random politician’s, it will scald no one, burn no one, except human integers beneath the nation’s sociopolitical hierarchies.

    “The Federal Government has today drawn the line on hate speech. Hate speech is a species of terrorism. Terrorism as it is defined popularly is the unlawful use of violence or intimidation against individuals or groups especially for political ends,” ýsaid Osinbajo, at a National Economic Council (NEC) retreat on national security at the Banquet Hall of the Presidential Villa.

    To an assemblage of state governors, ministers and other stakeholders, said: “As I have said, we’ve drawn a line against hate speech, it will not be tolerated, it will be taken as an act of terrorism and all of the consequences will follow it.”

    Sadly, Osinbajo’s pronouncement, like Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade, reverberates like a rat’s sigh under the claws of a wild cat. The anti-terrorism law, like the All Progressives Congress’s ‘Change’ mantra, resonates as the triumph of noise over bite; the elevation of will from juvenile fantasy to eternal hysterics. It’s the paroxysm of mind over matter, often likable to the wishful thoughts of a cripple at the sight of a newly broken stallion.

    Osinbajo said that the intimidation of a population by words is an act of terrorism, that the APC administration intends to curtail. He noted that the Terrorism (Prevention) Act 2011 (as amended), defined terrorism as an act which is deliberately done with malice which may seriously harm or damage a country or seriously intimidate a population.

    Such pronouncement could be considered noble and perhaps valiant, in saner clime and under more promising considerations. But this is Nigeria, a nation where politicians pay lip service to ‘change.’

    Like his principal, Osinbajo lives oblivious to the miseries and deaths of Nigeria’s hopeless, impoverished, vulnerable divide. Indigent husbands and wives, the young and elderly, toddlers and newborns, die excruciatingly by affliction of hate governance and abhorrent leadership epitomised by the incumbent ruling class.

    Many more are falling off or getting bumped off the All Progressives Congress (APC)’s wagon of ‘Change’ via deathly roads, unemployment, terrorism and poverty. Sadly, Osinbajo, Buhari and their feeble opposition in the PDP,  live oblivious to these tragic realities.

    Both men, despite their overhyped “body language” which allegedly abhors corruption, have developed a knack for platitudinous chant and sound bites; Buhari vowed to wipe out corruption and Osinbajo vowed as Acting President, to treat hate speech as terrorism.

    Yet they conveniently ignore the inconvenient truths and symbolism that insinuates duplicity in their will. Both men are unable to weed out corrupt elements in their cabinet. Their administration lacks ingenuity, ethical and intellectual capacity to resolve the country’s electricity, security, unemployment and energy conundrum.

    Even if they reclaim power in 2019, Osinbajo, his boss, Buhari and cabinet, won’t resolve the nation’s electricity, security and unemployment woes.

    This is attributable to lack of will, inventiveness, moral certitude and proficiency of their administration. Thus the rot persists on their watch: Nigeria’s road transport network is in the worst state ever and there are no concrete plans to establish a functional and dependable rail system, road, air and sea transportation among others.

    It remains extremely impossible for children of ‘political nobodies’ and commoners to access quality education, loans and self-empowerment provisions touted by Osinbajo and his boss, as part of their grand plot to combat unemployment.

    Persistent ritual killings, by Badoo gang and company, still persists across the country and Nigeria pulses dangerously with hospital corridors of death. General hospitals and other primary care health centres (PHCs) are poorly staffed and underfunded. Little wonder Buhari had to embark on medical tourism abroad, in flagrant contradiction of the APC’s mantra of ‘change.’

    The APC leadership is unable to prosecute public officers perceived to be corrupt and answerable to scandalous charges, according to the EFCC.

    While Osinbajo mustered his anti-hate speech philosophy, was he unaware of hateful governance perpetrated by the APC and People’s Democratic Party (PDP) leadership across the country?

    Ogun State still looms like a gothic platitude of pain and death from its transit townships but the “Gateway State” remains Governor Ibikunle Amosun’s bower of bliss. There, in his stately Eden, he lives immune and insensate to the ravages of ill-will and pent-up fury tearing the natives apart from inside out.

    Amosun has a blast inside the Government House at Oke Mosan everyday simply because he does not have to stir and retire to bed wondering if he would die along the deadly stretch of Lagos-Abeokuta highway, particularly at the spots where innocent children, mothers, fathers – dependants and breadwinners – die like stray fowls, accidentally or by installments, in his severely cratered, administrative landmine.

    It’s the same rot across 36 States  of the federation. And this writer’s summation is amply substantiated by prominent chieftain of Osinbajo’s APC, Senator Dino Melaye, whose controversial recall was ‘unsurprisingly’ stalled in more controversial circumstances.

    “Unfortunately, we the leaders, myself inclusive, have failed this nation and have failed the younger generation, myself inclusive.

    “The reason why we are where we are today is because there is a disconnect between leadership and followership. Once there is no trust between the followership and the leadership, it will definitely have a negative concomitant effect on the economy, and every other facet of our national life.

    ‘’What we should fix is democracy; Democracy is government of the people, by the people and for the people.

    “What we have is greediocracy; government of the greedy by the greedy, for the greedy. ‘We the leaders want to win elections at all cost, so we spend money to win elections.

    “The followership also is greedy, they accept money to vote. So, head or tail, there is a need for attitudinal change and this is affecting everything,” admitted Melaye.

    It would be lovely and humane of Nigeria’s Vice President, Osinbajo, and his boss, President Buhari, to also treat hate governance as an act of terrorism, making sure that “all of the consequences will follow it.”