Tag: Hijab

  • Court orders use of hijab in Osun schools

    An Osun State High Court, sitting in Osogbo, the state capital on yesterday ruled in favour of use of hijab for female Muslim pupils in public schools.

     Delivering the judgment in the suit filed by the Osun State Muslim Community to compel the state government to approve the use of hijab in public schools, the presiding judge, Justice Jide Falola, ordered that wearing hijab was part of the fundamental rights of female Muslim pupils.

    Justice Falola cited section 38 (1) of the Nigerian constitution which stipulated the right of every individual to practice their religion in tandem to their religious faith.

    As early as 7.00 am, security agents, including the police, men of the Department of the State Service (DSS) were deployed to the court to prevent break down of law and order.

    Counsel to the Muslim community, Mr. Kazeem Odedeji, described the judgment as well deserved.

    In his reaction, counsel to the state chapter of Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Mr. Femi Ayandokun, said his client would appeal the judgement after proper consultation.

  • Police arrests Hijab-wearing robber

    Police arrests Hijab-wearing robber

    The Niger State Police Command has arrested a suspected robber, Gideon Ezechukwu, who allegedly uses the Hijab as camouflage during operations.

     

    ASP Bala Elkanah, Police Public Relation Officer in the state, made this known on Thursday during an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Minna.

     

    “On April 13, 2016 at about 6.00am one Gideon Ezechukwu of Dutsen Kura Gwari, Minna who dressed in women hijab was arrested by the police.

     

    “The suspect was arrested while trying to escape with an allegedly stolen red colour Jincheng motorcycle (rubber rubber),’’ he said.

     

    Elkana said that the motorcycle belong to one Mohammed Idris of same area.

     

    He said that investigation so far has revealed five accomplices who confessed to the crime, adding that one Yahaya Mohammed was the soothsayer to the suspect.

     

    Elkanah added that another suspect, Bala Usman served as spy for the suspected robbers before an operation.

     

    He said that three other suspects Nwoke Osita, Ogonna Peter and Onyeka Nnoli kept the alleged stolen items.

     

    Elkana said that items recovered from the suspects included a ladies Jincheng motorcycle, four bags containing wrappers, one washing machine, refrigerator, gas cylinder, DVD machine, charms, weaved artificial hair and hijab.

     

    A resident of Dutse Kura Gwari, Garba Bello, told NAN that most robberies in the area occur in the early hours of the morning.

     

    “There have been complains of robbery by neighbours whenever they come back from the early morning prayers. Unfortunately, nobody suspected him.

     

    “Most of the items caught with him were stolen from the house of his neighbour; the motorcycle, washing machine and generator.

     

    “He lives in a room and parlour and he never allow any of his co-tenant to enter his room. The police removed many items from the apartment,” he said.

  • Suspicion over Ese’s pregnancy status

    Suspicion over Ese’s pregnancy status

    There was suspicion, Wednesday, that the 14-year-old Ese Oruru abducted from Bayelsa State and forcefully married by a Kano-based Yunusa Dahiru, alias Yellow, is five-month-old pregnant.

    Though her pregnancy status could not be officially confirmed, sources said the white Hijab she wore when she was flown to Abuja on Tuesday must have been used to cover the pregnancy.

    Her physical condition, it was learnt, gave her away, as a pregnant minor.

    Following her health condition, the Force Headquarters, Abuja, reportedly changed her mode of transportation to Bayelsa State.

    Ese and her mother, Rose, were reportedly directed by the police to undertake their journey by air instead of by road.

    The freed minor and her mother were expected to flown to Port-Harcourt Airport, Rivers State where they would complete the journey to Yenagoa by road.

    Our correspondent gathered that the victim might be received by the state Governor, Mr. Seriake Dickson.

    A police source also confirmed that the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Solomon Arase, directed that Yunusa should be repatriated to the Bayelsa State Police Command for further investigations and possible prosecution.

    “Yunusa allegedly committed the offence in Yenagoa. So, he is expected to be moved to the state police command where further investigations would be carried out for possible prosecution”, the source who spoke in confidence said.

    But Faith, an elder sister to Ese, said nobody had said anything about her sister being pregnant.

    She insisted that her younger sister could not be pregnant.

  • ‘Hijab not banned in Oyo’

    ‘Hijab not banned in Oyo’

    THE Muslim Community of Oyo State (MUSCOYS) has dispelled rumours that the Oyo State government has banned the use of Hijab.

    The group’s chairman, Ishaq Sanni and Secretary Murziq Siyanbade said the government had directed the use of Hijab for whoever wishes to use it.

    They said: “Even though, the Muslim community noticed non-compliance by some recalcitrant and overzealous head teachers, we are working with the appropriate authorities to reverse the trend.

    “It is therefore in bad taste for any group to insinuate that the government has banned the use of Hijab.”

     

  • Why Muslim  women wear hijab

    Why Muslim women wear hijab

    Muslim students  commemorated the World Hijab Day with a sensitisation rally in some parts of Lagos State last Monday. MIFTAUDEEN RAJI (300-Level Mass Communication, University of Lagos) reports.

    Beyond its religious necessity, hijab, a headscarf worn by Muslim women to cover  their upper parts of the body, is seen as a source of pride and dignity by youngsters. During the celebration of the World Hijab Day last Monday, Muslims came out in large number in hijab to march through Lagos.

    Muslim youths in higher institutions, under the aegis of Muslim Students’ Society of Nigeria (MSSN), held a procession across the state to promote understanding on the use of hijab.

    The procession started at the University of Lagos (UNILAG) and it took the students through Ikeja and Yaba, where the Amirah (Female Head) of the Lagos State Unit of MSSN, Hajia Hafsah Badru, addressed the participants.

    Hajia Badru, who spoke on the theme of the event: Beautiful, confident and empowered, said wearing hijab was not a symbol of women oppression, noting that the willingness of the women to commemorate the day had dispelled the belief that the use of headscarf was foisted on them.

    “Muslim women desire to put on the Hijabs. It is not a symbol of oppression or segregation. We choose to wear it and we love it. It makes us beautiful, confident and empowered,” she said.

    She called for severe punishment against anyone who harassed Muslim women over the use of hijab, urging the government to prosecute security agents, who maltreated women in hijabs.

    •Hajia Badru
    •Hajia Badru

    Hajia Badru said: “The avalanche of agonising stories and revelations of intimidation of Muslim women in hijab in recent times are condemnable. We see them as acts against the laws of the land and Allah’s decree. Our stand is simple; if the government is truly not the one sending the security agents to harass Muslim women wearing hijab, it should prove that by fishing out the perpetrators of this heinous transgression against our women.

    “This is because the act of harassing women clad in hijab needs to be combated not only at the point of commission, but also after the act has been committed. The law remains the law and it must be duly applied, irrespective of whom it favours or not.”

    Badru, who condemned in entirety the activities of the Boko Haram sect, explained that Hijab worn by Muslims was not to support or aid the sect’s activities.

    Blaming corruption as a factor that gave room for abuses of Muslim women, Hajia Badru said: “Muslim women’s reason to wear hijab should not be what will be infringed upon, because they are not the ones who diverted the fund meant to buy arms to boost security.

    “Even when the Federal Government has successfully established that the arms fund was diverted, it is shocking to now see the same government, its soldiers, police and non-Muslim citizens portray religious intolerance to the tune of stopping the use of hijab.”

    •The Muslim students sensitising the public during the rally
    •The Muslim students sensitising the public during the rally

    The Muslim students displayed various placards with different inscriptions centered on educating non-Muslims on the use of hijab. They sang Islamic songs as the procession returned to the UNILAG campus.

    In a statement issued by Amirah of Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Zaynab AbdulAzeez,   the body said: “Hijab is not a culture. Its connotations are not Arabian, Egyptian, Pakistani, black or white; its usage is to provide a protection and safeguard women.

    “Hijab is not just a piece of cloth; it is a behaviour, manner, morality and it is mostly unimaginable that our government realises that a woman has the right to show what she has, but refuses to admit that she has the right to also cover it.

    “It is appalling that despite the recognition of religious freedom by the Nigeria Constitution and United Nations Charter, Muslims women in hijab are still being harassed in their various places of work, hospital, registration points, schools, streets, bus stops and in commercial vehicles.

    “Without bias, an abuse carried out against anyone’s freedom to practise the tenets of his or her religion is a disrespect and disregard to the Constitution and it constitutes an abuse of human rights.”

    The World Hijab Day is celebrated in more than 116 countries and over one million places across the world. It was initiated by Nazma Khan, a Bangladesh lady in New York in 2013. The day came into being in recognition of millions of Muslim women, who choose to wear the Hijab.

  • Hijab: Muslim women decry harassment, stigmatisation

    Hijab: Muslim women decry harassment, stigmatisation

    Nigeria Muslim women yesterday expressed concerns over the alleged stigmatisation and harassment of women in hijab, the women’s veil, across the country.

    The National Amirah of Al-Mu’minaat Organisation, Hajia Nimatullah Abdullateef, who addressed reporters in Lagos ahead of the World Hijab Day, noted that Muslim women were worried by the way the Army harassed their colleagues within and outside conflict zones because they wore hijab.

    She said hijab is a symbol of the Muslim woman’s faith and adherence to Allah’s injunction.

    According to her, Muslim women remember the harassment, persecution, emotional and psychological anguish women in hijab suffered recently in Nigeria, especially after President Muhammadu Buhari’s statement that the nation might consider a ban on the Islamic dress code, if terrorists continued to use it as a cover to bomb innocent people.

    Hajia Abdullateef decried the attempt by authorities of the Nigeria Identity Management Commission (NIMC) in its Ibadan, Oyo State office, to legislate and limit the hijab standards in Nigeria.

    The amirah (women’s leader) said the soldiers’ attitude remained a festering sore in “our heart, while we note with suppressed anguish the harassment of Muslim women in hijab by officers and men of the Nigerian Army within and without military installations in different cities all over Nigeria”.

    She added: “Other government agencies are trying to rob the Muslim of the hijab as her right to freedom of religious expression, by demanding that she expose her ears during image capturing. These are: the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) and the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC). We call on the leadership of these agencies to call their men to order.

    “We wish to remind the Nigerian security institutions that Boko Haram is the enemy and not Muslim hijabis (women in hijab). Indeed, Boko Haram has used several ingenious garbs and artefacts to camouflage its members and carry out its dastardly and evil attacks, including fruits, vegetables, motor vehicles and even fake army and police uniforms…”

     

  • Don’t ban hijab, group urges FG

    Don’t ban hijab, group urges FG

    An Islamic group, AL-MUMINAT organisation, on Tuesday implored the Federal Government not to ban the use of hijab in the country.

    The National Amirah of the group, Hajia Nimatullah AbdulLateef made the appeal at a news conference in Ikeja ahead of this year’s World Hijab Day celebration coming up on Feb.1.

    She said the hijab was a unique dressing to identify with Islam and was not to be used to perpetrate evil.

    AbduLateef said that some government agencies which were infringing on the religious rights of women wearing hijab should be called to order.

    She urged the Federal Government to sharpen its intelligence gathering to curb security challenges in the country.

    According to her, the Ministry of Education should also be made to return moral education into the primary school and secondary school syllabus.

    AbdulLateef said that this would not just help in moulding the character of children, but also help prevent them from being influenced by terrorists.

    The Commissioner for Youths and Social Development, Mrs Uzamat Yussuf said the World Hijab Day was to promote the campaign against physical judgment of women in Hijab.

    She said they should rather be judged based on their intellectual abilities.

  • Re – Hijab: Muslims against Muslims

    Preamble

    An article entitled ‘Hijab: “Muslims against Muslims” which appeared in this column penultimate Friday drew an unprecedented array of reactions from readers. A follow up to that article last Friday in this same column also attracted torrential reactions. Apparently, both articles struck the touchy parts of readers differently. And their simultaneous reactions, accordingly confirmed that assertion.

    As mortal beings, we jointly live in a world of diverse ideas and experiences. It is not always that we see what we look. Some see without looking. Some look without seeing. But in the end, we all return to the natural fallibility that confirms our mortality. As a columnist, I take responsibility for whatever storm or calm that greeted both articles. And at the same time, I thank all who reacted to them positively or negatively. Allah knows best. Here we go:

     

    Reactions

    “….NACOMYO has made it categorically clear that hijab can never be separated from believing women, so banning hijab is banning the practice of Islam. The claim by the writer that the “the experience in the countries such as Niger Republic, Chad and Cameroon where the spate of mass murder by bomb blasts concealed in Islamic dress in those countries went down tremendously, following the ban on certain types of hijab” cannot be substantiated because the gendarmerie in these countries are well equipped, up to the task and are up-and-doing to contain the insurgency. The role played by the Chadian armed forces in dealing Boko Haram in Nigeria, before President Muhammadu Buhari took over, a deadly blow, cannot be over-emphasized. On January 12, Boko Haram still struck in northern Cameroon where 13 Muslim faithfuls were brutally killed by a man suicide bomber in a Mosque!

    NACOMYO has strong belief in the sincerity of the incumbent government to eradicate Boko Haram without banning hijab and we have seen the handwriting on the wall already. All what the government needs is our full support and vigorous prayers for its success in bringing the insurgency to a quick end, fighting corruption to a standstill as well as rejuvenation of Nigerian economy. Mallam Garba Shehu, the President’s Spokesman has officially denied the hijab ban, what’s more?

    Finally, NACOMYO advises the columnist, and his likes, to always use their pens to promote, defend, propagate Islam and educate non-Muslims about Islam rather than compromising the religion at any slight provocation. They should learn from the action of the only woman on the panel who successfully boxed the President to a tight corner on the issue of hijab. Her action seemed propelled by religious interest rather than by professional zeal…”

    Binyamin Yusuf, Secretary-General NACOMYO

     

    My dear brother Femi Abbas, after carefully going through your write up titled ‘Hijab: Muslims against Muslims’ and the barrage of reactions that awashed (sic) the social media from our Muslim brothers, I felt pity for you. Your follow up article titled: ‘The Message and ‘The Messenger’ however came as a relief and a justification for my caution against reacting in a hurry. What some of those reactions intended to do was to give you a public ridicule and disgrace. And that perhaps forced you to throw your background open, a thing you had never done in your 33 years of writing the same column. That shows that the motive was beyond the article they reacted to. But thank God, you have proved your intellectual worth and restored the confidence of your genuine readers by delivering the goods as expected of you. However, without those tendentious reactions most of your readers would not have known anything about your background and professional antecedent. Now, I am more strongly confident in ‘The ‘Message’ column. Please, ride on. God bless you.

    Jelili Adebare, Shaki, Oyo State

     

    Alhaji Femi Abbas, have you ever heard the story of the lion and the lamb? Both animals met at a stream where they went to drink water. On sighting the lamb, the lion greedily accosted her by alleging that the lamb was polluting the stream. The lamb said “it is not possible since I am drinking at the lower part of the stream and you (lion) are at the upper side”. The lion then said you want to abuse me again as you did here this time last year? The lamb replied that I had not been born this time last year. Then, the lion said if it wasn’t you, it must have been your mother. The wild cat thereafter pounced on the innocent lamb and made a meal of it. That is the parable of our brothers’ provocative reactions to your article even after you had effected correction. But I am not surprised as that is characteristic of new school Muslims in Nigeria today. Femi, just stand by Allah and He will stand by you always.

    Abdullah Musa Zubair. Kaduna

     

    Mallam Femi, reading through your article captioned ‘The Message’ and the Messenger’ last Friday, one could feel that you were worried. I don’t think there is anything to worry about. The duty of people who have little or nothing to offer the society is to disturb those who have societal value. You are not a local columnist and cannot be rubbished by local nuisance. With Allah’s tremendous endowment for you, such envious reactions ought to have been expected from time to time. Every success has a cost. Yours cannot be an exception. You should rejoice that the unwarranted attacks on you in the social media over your article on Hijab has turned out to be a booster and not a diminisher (sic) of your enviable image. Alhamdulillah. Please, throw the past behind you and continue your good work as usual. Allah will continue to guide and protect you.

    Suleiman Guruje, Abuja

     

    Alhaji Femi Abbas, the interruption brought into your column by the bitter critics of your article on hijab was not against you but against those of us who are regular readers of that column. Most of those who reacted did not read the article in question. Some of them called me to ask for your telephone number and email address both of which are constantly present in the head mast of your column. You will also notice that most of them could not even spell your name (Abbas) correctly. That will confirm to you the type of people you are dealing with. Ironically, most of those people who can be called new school in Islam had not been born by the time you started writing a column. I appeal to you to please concentrate on the wheat of your profession while you leave the chaff for the goats. Your quality will never diminish. Assalam alaikun.

    Salihu Fazazi, Auchi, Edo State

     

    Mallam Abbas, I have never met you in person, neither have I seen your photograph anywhere. But I want you to look at the appearance of the modern day propagators of Islam. When I read your article titled ‘The Message’ and ‘The Messenger’ my mind just quickly went to the young Muslim brothers who claim to be engaged in da’wah. Should any propagator of Islam be shabby? How can a shabby person win souls for Islam? Please, whenever you meet them take a second look at them. I am disgusted. These are the people who want us to see them as scholars. Does scholarship take away decency from a scholar? Islam is becoming something else in the hands of modern day Muslim scholars. We must do something about it. Please, lead us. God will give you all you need to lead.

    Shakirullah M. Haruna, Brinin-Kebbi, Kebbi State

     

    Ustadh Femi Abbas, I have followed very keenly the arguments for and against the ban on the use of Hijab or Burqah between you and some of your readers in your column. As usual, your detailed analysis of the origin and genesis of hijab is highly appreciated and by that analysis we are better educated. Those who are denying your claim and calling you names have not told us their own version of the history of that Islamic dress. We thank Allah that you inform and educate with your column without necessarily claiming to be a scholar. That is a mark of humility. May God increase your knowledge and your wisdom.

    Salim A. Abubakar, Dutse, Jigawa State   

     

    Mr. Femi Abbas, Reading your last Friday article was quite interesting. I had to quickly look for the one of the Friday before which warranted the writing of the second. My conclusion after reading both was that Nigerians generally acknowledge good work only posthumously. You know what that means? How many of those emergency critics are capable of writing Islamic columns of your standard? Ordinarily, there is nothing bad in calling your attention to an error. But when a handshake goes beyond the elbow, it becomes suspicious. Intention matters a lot. From the reactions I have read in the social media so far, it seems that most of the critics had been looking for an opportunity to attack you on something else which they have not yet disclosed. But don’t be bothered. It is all part of experience. We shall intensify our prayers to Allah to continue to provide you with long life and formidable protection and give us more men of your type. Remain blessed!

    Mubarak Ahmad Mubarak, Jos, Plateau State

     

    Alhaji Abbas, those who seized the opportunity of your error in the article on hijab to say you are rather a nonentity than a scholar, have their hidden agenda. Through what I read in their reactions, I discovered that they have redefined scholarship. To them, only people who know Hadith and Islamic history are qualified to be called scholars. They have made Hadith the primary source of Islamic Law. Even where the contents of the Qur’an evidently contradict their quoted Hadith, they stick to the latter. So, with Hadith, they can easily pronounce Hell in judgment over their victims. Other learned people, irrespective of the depth of their knowledge, cannot be scholars.

    That is why a person like you cannot be qualified for a scholar. It is a matter of blackmail. But if you join them today, you will automatically be recognised as a scholar. We are talking of the modern day diabolical scholars who must be seen as such to be able to exploit the Muslim Ummah. Rather than lifting Islam, these people have relegated the divine religion through dogmatism rather than dynamism which Islam stands for. Hijab is not the problem but those who are campaign for it. We must cooperate to rescue the situation. We cannot continue like this. God bless you.

    Adam Olajide Ojengbede, Ile-Ife, Osun State

     

    Ustadh Femi Abbas, for many years, we, the permanent readers of your column have benefited tremendously from the fountain of your knowledge and we are not idiots. We can easily distinguish between the wheat and the chaff. No emergency/extremist tutors can confuse us at this stage with strange tutelage like the one that bred Boko Haram insurgents. We know that life is sacred in Islam and anything that can lead to deliberate termination of lives unjustifiably must be avoided. Islam is neither a bloody religion nor a religion of nudism. Hijab is an ordained costume for Muslim women but it does not necessarily have to be Burqah or Khimar. That is the point you were making and we understand it very well. We are quite familiar with your writings and logic. Anybody can make a mistake. Your clarification in the second article should be reasonably comprehensible to any responsible Muslim who has no ulterior motive. We are satisfied. Let those who see religion as an instrument of mass murder separate their mode of worship from that of conventional Islam. No one can lure us into blind fanaticism.

    Bamidele Ibrahim, Ikare, Ondo State

     

    Assalam alaikum, you are always an enjoyable columnist and preacher of Islamic issues. May I advise you to compile your articles of about 33 years into a book form for the benefit of Muslims and to serve as a further means of reference. On issues of hijab, your explanation is well understood and should be acceptable to all. Ma salam.

    Hon. ADEYINKA Corsim, Osodi, Lagos

     

    I sincerely appreciate respected Alhaji Femi Abbas to have written this article; ‘The Message’ and ‘The Messenger’.  May Allah overlook our shortcomings.  I think we should all see it as a reminder that perfection and absoluteness are only for ALLAH especially as it clarifies his mistake by showing the missing link in the article which according to him, he had inadvertently omitted.

    “Banning Burqah rather than Hijab is not the same as banning Islam” was said to be the original draft and not “Banning Hijab is not the same as banning Islam”

    I implore all Muslims that we write a rejoinder to him appreciating his courage to accept his mistakes and show him genuine and increase love and concern. For me, I take your clarification as true and I apologise for any denial and or castigation you may have received on behalf my Muslim brothers and sisters. Regards.

    Akinfenwa Omolaja Akeem

     

    Ustadh Femi, We have problem. The issue here is not about hijab per se. We know hijab as a divinely ordained dress for Muslim women. Wearing it is not negotiable. But Islam, in our society today, is passing through a new trend that may be bigger and more dangerous than Boko Haram. Are you aware that our female children are now being waylaid by some modern day self-acclaimed scholars? These heretical scholars who evidently toe the line of the Taliban, ISIS and Al-Shabbab are out to destroy the lives of our female children. They do not only persuade them to withdraw from their University courses, they also marry them out through match making without the consents of their parents. They convince the innocent girls that once they attain the age of 18, they do not need their parents’ consents again to take decisions on issues including marriage. They then ask such girls to send some tins of condensed milk to their mothers as a replacement for the milk they had sucked from those mothers’ breasts at infancy.

    By the ‘Salafi’ philosophy of these ‘satanic scholars’, women are not supposed to work outside the confines of their matrimonial homes and therefore, they do not need any certificate. They also try to convince some young Muslim graduates to do away with their University degrees or forget about Al-Janna (Paradise). Some of such ‘scholars have even created special camps at which they indoctrinate their captives after hypnotising them.

    Please, Femi, use your powerful column to correct this terrible anomaly and educate Nigerian public about it before it is too late. Some parents who have fallen victim to this evil are still gnawing their teeth. Others must not become their victims again. And if you have female children especially in higher institutions please, monitor them very well. You have intellectually used your popular column for Nigerian Muslim Ummah in the past 33 years. Allah will reward you abundantly. But this is not the time to relent. Allah will help you as you are helping others. We need more information and education through your column.

    Sulaiman Olaoye Jubril, Lokoja, Kogi State.

  • Army condemns men for allegedly removing woman’s veil

    Army condemns men for allegedly removing woman’s veil

    •Muslim community protests
    •Ambode: hijab not banned in Lagos

    The Army on Sunday dissociated itself from the action of its men who allegedly removed the veil of a muslim woman in Lagos last Friday.

    The incident has sparked protests from the Muslim community, which is calling on the Presidency to make its stand known on the use of hijab.

    Governor Akinwunmi Ambode condemned the soldiers’ action, saying hijab is not banned in Lagos State.

    Army’s 81 Division 1 Public Relations Officer Col James Samuel said the military did not direct soldiers to harrass women in hijab.

    The army, Samuel said, was unaware of the incident.

    Two soldiers last Friday in Meiran, Ojokoro Local Council Development Area of Lagos removed the woman’s veil, claiming that its use had been banned.

    Islamic organisations and clerics took to social media to condemn the action.

    According to an eyewitness, Adetutu Oluwa, the soldiers allegedly alighted from their vehicle on sighting a woman dressed in veil and started harassing her.

    One of them, she claimed, forcefully removed the veil, popularly referred to as Niqab, from the woman’s head and warned her never to use it in public again.

    “After removing the veil, one of the soldiers said: ‘This thing is not allowed in our country again. You can use it in your house.’  They both walked back to their vehicle with the veil,” Oluwa alleged.

    According to her, it took the intervention of passersby and sympathisers for the woman to get her veil back.

    “On sensing cold reaction from the people, the soldiers dropped the veil on the floor, entered their vehicle and zoomed off,” she said.

    Oluwa in a programme monitored on Star 101.5 FM on Saturday said: “I was traumatised by the situation even though I wasn’t the one harassed.”

    According to islamic organisations and scholars, the President’s statement on the possibility of banning hijab because many Boko Haram suicide bombers hide under it to wreak havoc, is being used as excuse to harass Islamic women nationwide.

    “Everything must be done to balance national security requirements with religious rights and obligations of citizens protected as enshrined in the constitution,” said Mallam Saheed Ashafa, Muslim Students’ Society of Nigeria (MSSN), Lagos State Area Unit president.

    A lawyer, Mutiat Orolu-Balogun, described the soldiers’ action as callous, saying: “It is easy to point fingers if you are not sacrificing or not being inconvenienced. Some sections are easy to clamour for the ban on hijab because they are not using it or they are looking for an excuse not to or they want everyone to be naked like them. Whichever is their wish or thought as the case may be, they need fresh orientation.”

    Lagos State University (LASU) lecturer Mrs Ganiya Adenle said: “When there is a fire, I don’t see fire fighters killing the smoke, they rather go to the base of the fire. The government should go to the root of Boko Haram, find out those behind it and stop killing the smoke of Boko Haram.”

    Dousing tension, Governor Ambode said hijab has not been banned in Lagos State.

    He spoke on Saturday during the inauguration of The Muslim Congress (TMC) Imams at TMC Dawah Centre in Ijeshatedo.

    Ambode said the government has not directed security operatives to go on such mission.

    The governor said: “I want to assure you that government does not know anything about what happened on Friday at Meiran. Lagos State has not banned hijab. The Federal government has not banned hijab and we are warning all security operatives to desist from all acts that can lead to religious tension.”

    Ambode appealed to the crowd to remain law-abiding and not to take the laws into its hands, promising to look into the case.

    “Nobody is above the law. Muslims should be free to practise their religion. Christians should feel free to practise their religion,” he said.

    Ambode, represented by Home Affairs Commissioner Dr Abdul Abdul Hakeem AbdulLateef, thanked the congress for its support during the last elections.

    “Personally, I don’t think that banning hijab is the solution to the menace of terrorism,” AbdulLateef said, adding: “Ever since journalism has been practised as a profession, there are journalists who have come out with articles and information capable of creating tension and derailing the government. No government has because of that banned journalism.

    “We cannot because of the excesses of some people begin to trample on the fundamental human rights of others.

    “It is good that all religious organisations are taking it on board. They are now using metal detectors to ensure nobody comes in with bomb. This is the message that all churches and mosques are taking on board.”

    The governor noted that religious leaders are critical stakeholders in the development of the state and the country.

    “We’ll not because of what is happening now violate our own constitution. We recognise the fact that section 38 of the constitution allows the freedom of religion either as individuals on in community with others to observe and propagate their religion. We will never allow any security officials to take the law into its hands.  This is our electoral promise to Lagosians,” Ambode said.

  • Hijab: Muslims against Muslims

    Hijab: Muslims against Muslims

    Preamble

    Controversy is a Nigerian. It occupies a delicate but vintage position in the hearts of most citizens and revolves incessantly around trivial matters often to the detriment of serious and meaningful issues. In no other country of the world does controversy thrive as much as it does in Nigeria. Nigerians take pride in the vainglory offishing out controversy even where it serves no purpose. When public controversy in Nigeria is not about politics, it may be about tribe or religion or gender. If this country is most qualified for any adorable medal it is in the realm of controversy.

    Through such controversies certain peculiar vocabulary such as tribalism, nepotism, marginalisation, ‘islamisation’and annulment often surface.

     

    The current controversy

    Currently, another controversy is raging in the country.It is about an allegedly proposed ban on the Muslim women attire called Hijab.

    Incidentally, this controversy is between the Nigerian Muslim community and the Federal Government on the one hand and within the Muslim community on the other. Some Muslims are alleging that the Federal Government is planning to ban the wearing of hijab by Muslim women and are therefore calling on President Muhammadu Buhari not to dare it as such action may entail serious implications.

    Ironically, some other Muslims believe that the gross abuse to which hijab is subjected(especially by Boko Haram vandals) as well as the embarrassment which such abuse constitutes to Islam has long warranted the ban on hijab.

    In the melee, a fierce controversy has ensued between both sides.Thus,some Muslim groups and individuals have taken to the internet to sensitise the Nigerian Muslim Ummah on the need to counter the alleged proposal with a view to preempting the Federal Government from turning such allegation into a reality.

     

    Proposal to ban Hijab

    What most Nigerians, especially Muslim agitators, do not seem to know is that the proposal to ban hijab did not emanate from the Federal Government of Nigeria. Rather,it came out of a security meeting held by the Presidents of West African countries otherwise called ECOWAS. And the reason for resorting to such a proposal is the well-known rampant and continuous mass killing of innocent people with bomb blasts by some devilish elements who callously use such dress to conceal the bombs.

    The proposal came up subsequent to the experience in countries such as Niger Republic, Chad and Cameroon where the spate of mass murder by bomb blasts concealed in Islamic dress in those countries went down tremendously, following the ban on certain types of hijab.

    This experience came to confirm that the abuse of those female Muslim garments by some devilish elements in the society who are bent on decimating Islam by all means. It is the main cause of mass killing adopted by Boko Haram devils.

    However, despite the ban on those types of hijab, Muslim women in those countries still cover their heads as well as their bodies but not in the types of robe that can aid concealment of bombs. Besides, the three governors of the frontline states in the Boko Haram war (Adamawa, Bornu and Yobe) have also proposed the banning of the dress for the purpose of peace.

     

    What is Hijab?

    Linguistically, the Arabic word hijab means rein which is a kind of strap with which a domestic animal, such as horse, is cautioned against dangerous surge or unbridled aggression.

    Derivatively, hijab is a kind of scarf adopted in Islam for Muslim women to cover their heads as well as to protect the sensitive parts of their bodies against immoral or sensual exposure. This is to prevent any possible harassment or abuse to which immoral dressing easily subjects women in the society.

    By Islamic prescription, hijab is mostly meant for women who have attained the age of puberty. But younger women may wear it as a rehearsal in preparation for their attainment of puberty.

     

    Types of Hijab

    Although the general name by which this attire is known is hijab, there are other names according to the types designed draped and worn by various Muslim women in various countries and Muslim societies of the world. There are several types of this attire. For instance, in most Arab countries, it is either called Abayah (loose and flowing outer garment that covers the entire body from head to feet excluding the face) or Al-Amirah (which consists of a close fitting cap, usually made from cotton or polyester in form of an accompanying tube-like scarf) or Burqah (a complete cloak-like garment that covers the entire body including the head and the face) or Khimar (which is almost same as Burqah except for its exclusion of Niqab).

    Niqab is the special substance meant to cover the nose of a Burqah wearing woman. In short, the name depends on the pattern of sewing and the community in which it is worn.

    Meanwhile, the type of attire which the Boko Haram heretic group forces some women to conceal bomb in and which most Nigerians generally call hijab is either Burqah or Khimar or Abayah. These are the types banned in Niger, Chad and Cameroon which are also being proposed for banning in the entire West African region.

     

    Why do Muslim Women wear Hijab?

    Hijab is a dress of decency divinely prescribed for Muslim women to preserve their chastity and to ward off any indecent attraction that may cause public harassment for them or subject them to sexual abuse.See Quran 33 verse 59 which states thus in respect of hijab:

    “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the wives of Muslim believers to clad themselves in their outer garments;that is more dignifying for them to be identified with so that they will not be harassed; Allah is most forgiving, Merciful”.

     

    Genesis of Hijab

    Long before the advent of Islam, hijab had been in use by women of various religions, including Jews, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Christians and Buddhists though it was called different names.

    Head cover (hijab) was globally regarded as a spiritual dress of dignity as women who wore it were accorded high level of respect. Today, as in the days of yore, each community has a name for it in consonance with its religion and language. For instance, it is called Chardon in Iran just as it is called Dupatta in Pakistan and Mukena or Selendang in Indonesia. In Malaysia, it is called Tudung or Kerudung. But Islam came to statutorily adopt it in the early 7th century as a peculiar identity for Muslim women in some countries in Asia and the Middle East, including Arabia.

    Hijab is not necessarily a combination of long garment plus scarf as designed in the mentioned countries. And Islam did not limit it to any particular design or colour. Other dignifying dresses like the type of “up and down” (Buba and Iro) type of attire worn decently by Nigerian Muslim women in the Northern and South Western parts of the country which do not expose their bodies in any way is equally qualified to be called hijab.

    It is rather unfortunate that some satanic forces have now turned the protective dress generally called hijab into an instrument of death by violence. But this is not quite strange since virtually every beneficial substance anywhere in the world today is satanically abused.

     

    History of Hijab

    Hijab reached the Arabian Peninsula from India via Persia (now Iran) several centuries before the advent of Islam. It was originally meant for the upper class people, such as princesses and wives of monarchs. But it later became a dress for all willing women when it was adopted by Islam not as a dress of class but as a respectable dress of chastity. Islam is not a religion of class. Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was divinely mandated to preach the religion of peace to all and sundry. Thus, hijab as an adopted dress for Muslim women could not have been discriminatory as it used to be before the advent of Islam.

    Despite its adoption as an Islamic dress, the type of hijab designed and worn in some Muslim countries is not necessarily mandatory on all Muslim women. What is mandatory is decent dressing that keeps chastity and maintains fidelity. Every nation has its language and culture. Islam does not reject a particular language or culture except it contradicts any of its fundamental tenets. That is why Muslim women who wear either Burqah or Khimar are in the minority worldwide. A woman who does not wear Burqah or Khimar cannot be declared persona-non grata in Islam. As far as dressing in Islam is concerned, decency is the general norm.

     

    Implications of Banning Hijab

    Hijab, like any other decent dress is a matter of human right which no government can unilaterally ban. But if anything in Islam constitutes danger to human lives and constitutes threat to peace in a society, such a thing could be banned or suspended for the purpose of peace. Prophet Muhammad (SAW) showed a good example of this when he sacrificed a whole pillar of Islam (Hajj) for the purpose of peace in 628 CE. Six years after he was forced to migrate from Makkah to Madinah in 622 CE, he decided to go on pilgrimage in Makkah following inspiration to perform Hajj that year.

     

    The Prophet’s Example

    Thus, accompanied by 1400 Muslim men and women who were fully dressed in Hajj regalia, the Prophet set out on pilgrimage in March 628 CE. The congregation had taken along with them all their needs including the rams they would slaughter. He had thought that the Meccans would respect the sacredness of the month and honour pilgrimage as customary in Makkah. But that assumption did not work.

    On getting information about the Prophet’s trip to Makkah for pilgrimage, the Meccans quickly assembled and sent a delegation to meet the him and his entourage on their way to Makkah to tell them that they would not be allowed to enter the city.

    Most of the Prophet’s companions were infuriated by that message from the Meccans and urged the Prophet to promptly declare a war. But the Prophet turned down such a request and rather asked the Meccans to come up for a treaty that would facilitate peace. Thus, each side set up a peace committee and they jointly resolved to put the treaty into writing.

    In the process of writing the treaty, the Meccans objected to any reference to the name of Muhammad (SAW) as a‘Prophetof Allah’. The Prophet’s Companions countered the objection and insisted on preceding Muhammad’s name with the word Prophet. But again, the Prophet calmed down his companions and agreed to the demand of the Meccans.

     

    The Clauses of the Treaty

    The contents of the treaty signed by the leaders were as follows:

    1. Both parties would cease hostilities for a period of ten years.
    2. The parties would not interfere with the free movement of one another.
    3. The Prophet (Peace and blessings of Allah upon him) would return that year, but the Muslims would be permitted to enter Makkah the following year.
    4. Any Muslim man coming from the Quraysh to join the Muslims would be sent back, but any man going from the Muslims to Quraysh would not be sent back.
    5. Any tribes other than the Quraysh that wished to enter an alliance with Muhammad (Peace and blessings of Allah upon him) were free to do so, and any that wished to enter an alliance with the Quraysh were free to do so.

    By the contents of that treaty, the Muslims were prevented from performing that year’s Hajj which was to be the Prophet’s first Hajj. That showed the value of peace in Islam.But eventually, the treaty turned out to be a victory for Islam as it became an unprecedented catalyst for the propagation the religion.

     

    Conclusion

    If Prophet Muhammad (SAW) could go so far to ventilate the atmosphere for peace why can’t the Muslims of today follow suit?

    I am a Muslim who believes strongly in the use of Hijab by Muslim women. But considering the thousands of lives so far lost in Nigeria through the abuse of Islamic dress by some devilish elements one would think that Nigerian Muslims should show understanding and co-operate with the authorities on any reasonable measure that will stem the spate of killings without disrupting their mode of worship. Banning hijab is not the same as banning the practice of Islam. Life is sacred. And to worship, one needs to be alive. God bless Nigeria.