Tag: Hijab

  • Hijab: Marriage of faith and fashion

    Hijab: Marriage of faith and fashion

    In Islam, the word ‘Hijab’ literally means a screen or curtain. However, by semantic extension, Hijab suggests a veil for covering the head and chest, particularly by Muslim females who have attained puberty. It is also a symbol of modesty, privacy and morality. Historically, women in the Islamic culture wore veils to cover themselves.

    Interestingly, in modern times, learning about the different kinds of Hijab can help a Muslim woman enjoy a fulfilling shopping experience. It affords the user the opportunity to adhere to her cultural standards, while expressing her individuality through her choice of colour, style and fabric.

    Just as there are different types of Hijab, there are many options for purchasing these garments. For instance, there are retail Islamic stores that specifically deal in these items. An example is Arabel, an upscale Islamic store, where items, ranging from the simple to the avant-garde, are sold. It also offers online trading to show buyers an opportunity to learn how to differentiate between the styles of Hijab as well as where to purchase specific garments that are worn comfortably and securely.

    However, while some prefer to visit some of these ‘elitist’ Islamic stores, others prefer to patronise individuals in some markets across the country with the belief that they can enjoy the luxury of haggling over the prices.

    Hijab usually comes in different shapes and sizes. They can sometimes be small or large, but it solely depends on the taste of the buyer. It may also be square, triangular and rectangular, depending on how it is used.

    Hijab comes in silk, chiffon, cotton, polyester and rayon or a combination of fabrics and sells for between N500 and N15, 000 per one. At times, it comes in patterned or flowery designs. Buyers may also consider wearing under- scarves, which are accessories worn to keep a woman’s hair from slipping out of the Hijab.

    Over the years, Hijab has changed in appearance and is now available in different varieties. People have come to like Jacquard veils, which come in various designs and colour because they suit different occasions and fit their personalities.

  • Religious distinction:  before the lights go out

    Religious distinction: before the lights go out

    Last Sunday, Muslim protesters, many of them quite young, marched through Lagos streets campaigning for the right to wear hijab in public schools. The protest drew significant attention. But the state government continues to resist any attempt to create what it describes as distinctions in public primary and secondary schools. Tertiary institutions in the state and elsewhere do not bar distinctive dresses. Last week too, some students in Baptist High School, Iwo in Osun State took their campaign for dress distinction to a new height, perhaps flowing from the unresolved disagreement over the state’s controversial reclassification of schools. Christian and Muslim students not only wore distinctive dresses showcasing their religions, they insisted on conducting morning assemblies along distinct religious lines. A report suggested that even traditional religion worshippers in the same school wore dresses indicating their faith.

    Religious differences mixed unhealthily with deep socio-economic cleavages have turned the north-eastern part of the country into a difficult place to live and work. The trauma is spreading steadily but insidiously into the Southwest, a zone hitherto recognised as an oasis of religious, ethnic and class tolerance. Indeed, many Christian groups have begun to question what they believe is the dominance of the Muslim political elite in the zone’s governmental affairs. They have, for instance, started to campaign for the election of a Christian governor in Lagos State, arguing that with the exception of the brief governorship of Michael Otedola, no Christian had been governor of the state since the Second Republic. The campaign is of course a psychological one, for no Lagos governor has been accused of sectarian bias in any form.

    If sectarian differences are heightening in the Southwest, it is perhaps because the zone’s leaders have been unable to anticipate the problem and unsure how to handle the delicate issue. Lagos has been a little more assertive in sustaining the status quo, insisting that students in public schools wear the same uniform for the simple reason that public schools remain exactly that – public schools. Students in private schools are at liberty to wear regulation dresses and uniforms as their proprietors deem fit. It is, however, not clear how much longer Lagos can hold out, for the campaigns are unlikely to ease off without a major counter-campaign by the zone’s elite. The campaign to wear uniforms indicating one’s religious persuasion is gradually spreading in the zone. Indeed, Osun State is currently at the vortex of the crisis, having attracted controversy by making one concession after another to religious activists. Concessions, as everyone knows, beget even more concessions.

    Going by the deeply disturbing sectarian killings, Boko Haram insurgency and other socio-economic revolts shaking the northern part of the country to its foundations, it is difficult to explain why the Southwest has refused to be proactive. When former Zamfara State governor, Sani Ahmed (Yerima), embraced religious distinction through what former President Olusegun Obasanjo called political sharia, I warned that the lights might be going out over Northern Nigeria. After mourning the collapse of secularism in the North where I grew up and schooled, I indicated that the region was beginning to spawn a brood of vipers with fatal consequences for both the elite and the underclass. I thought at the time that those consequences would be limited to perhaps some isolated cases of violence and terror attacks against secular or Christian targets. I never imagined we would experience the systematic conflagration triggered by the Boko Haram Islamic sect, nor did I even imagine that young, sometimes well-heeled individuals would embrace suicide missions.

    The consequence of the carelessness of the northern elite, who rode on the back of religion to power or tried to use religion as their footstool, is that many parts of the North have become ‘Lebanonised’ and ‘Pakistanised’. Nigeria struggled against periodic outbreaks of Maitatsine revolts in the 1980s; now they are grappling with consistent sectarian insurgency, complete with genocidal tendencies and ethnic cleansing. I do not have the impression that the North has learnt the right lessons of how to leave religion quite out of politics and out of social life, and I really think the problem will get much worse than it already is before the society wakes up to the sinister consequences of mixing governance with religion.

    I therefore expected the self-acclaimed enlightened Southwest to comprehensively understand the acute dangers of trifling with religion. They know the harmful effects sectarian controversies and violent disagreements have on development, yet they have puzzlingly decided to meddle with it, pretending they could tap its potentials and leash the genie. But we have the history of the Maghreb to learn from. In fact, the stalling of the Syrian revolt against Bashir Al-Assad’s rule, particularly the cold feet developed by the West in intervening in that country, is not unconnected with the complications introduced into the revolt by high-level sectarian overtone. Al-Assad has paradoxically turned out to be the defender of secularism, and his opponents are either affiliated to al-Qaeda or have developed their own peculiar hot brand of adulterated theocracy.

    While Tunisia was struggling to retain some secularist flavour and Libya was trying to discover the identity it prefers for this modern era, Egypt under Mohammed Morsi plunged unadvisedly into non-secularist governance. The Egyptian military, still bathing under the hue of Nasserism, has constituted itself into a bastion of mild secularism. This was why it moved against Morsi’s government, rewrote the constitution by deleting expressly theocratic provisions, and seems bent now on installing one of its own in power both to pursue the peace that has eluded the country for months and to protect the country’s secularist principles. Turkey, until recently, also had a military that served as the protector of the country’s secularism, inspired by the iconic Ataturk who brilliantly and foresightedly drew a line between state and religion, including banning the hijab in schools and offices.

    After the debacle in the North, from which the rest of Nigeria ought to draw lessons, it is sad that Southwest governors and political leaders have taken for granted the long-standing and enviable secularism of their zone. The cultural sinews that nourished and recommended the zone’s secularist tendency have today proved too fragile to keep the secularist principles instituted by the zone’s founding fathers. As a region and empire, the zone drew firm lines between its legislative, religious and executive components. The lines have been obfuscated not simply because of the march of time and civilisation, but because of the carelessness and meddlesomeness of the zones’ leaders. We cannot pretend that religious differences do not exist, but we can and should firmly and unrepentantly set boundaries for them. The heightening controversies and differences among the zone’s religious persuasions, which are already hardening into sectarian distinctions and enclaves, will not resolve themselves. The zone’s leaders must act now if the oasis of religious peace and interconnectedness that the zone has been for centuries is not to become a dangerous and seething mirage.

    As the sharp differences in the Osun school shows, when the problem starts, no one is immune. If Osun does not carefully handle the controversy and treat the disease from its roots, it is a matter of time before violence becomes a part of the crisis. The time to act is now. And like Osun, it is hard to know what intentions lurk in the minds of parents in Lagos promoting religious distinctions in the minds of impressionable youths. This is dangerous and short-sighted. We all have a duty to promote togetherness among our young ones, no matter their religious persuasion. If the zone’s culture, civilisation and humanity are no longer strong enough to bind the people of the zone together, then it is headed for even much more trouble than the North is experiencing.

    A few months ago, using Osun as the springboard for my analysis, I pointed out that political leaders in the Southwest needed to do something concrete about the incipient religious disharmony in the zone. The warning is still apposite today; for obviously the problem will not go away on its own. Instead, it will probably worsen if nothing is done beyond just appealing to religious leaders to maintain peace, and opinion leaders to refrain from stoking the embers of discord. Those sort of appeals profited the North nothing, apparently. They are not likely to profit anyone in the Southwest in any way. Governors and governments of the zone have an urgent need to stay away from religion almost totally if the zone is not to descend into a maelstrom of sectarian violence. Already the lights of peace and civilisation are flickering over Nigeria, the Southwest not excluded; we must not let them be extinguished altogether.

  • How Oyo averted religious crisis in Iseyin

    The postponement of the second term resumption of public and private schools in Iseyin town by one week saved the ancient town from religious crisis already brewing among adherents, it has emerged.

    The Oyo State Government had postponed resumption for schools in Iseyin by one week on sensing trouble.

    It was learnt that Muslims had informed female Muslim students, particularly those from Iseyin District Grammar School, to start wearing hijab to school once the second term kicked off.

    They insisted that any school tradition that denied their female students of their right to wear hijab like their Christian counterparts wearing beret would be resisted by all means possible.

    The situation, which had generated tension in the town, compelled the state government to convey a meeting with education stakeholders at the palace of Aseyin of Iseyin on January 4, two days to the resumption of the schools.

    The meeting afforded representatives of both religions to express their views, though no compromise was reached on the contentious issue.

    At the follow-up meeting held on January 9, it was resolved that in Muslim-named/faith-based public schools, the usage/wearing of hijab should be allowed in accordance with the Islamic tradition/religious belief of the affected students.

    It was also agreed that in Christian-named/faith-based public schools, the uniforms should be in line with the established tradition of the school and Christian religion.

     

    Part of the resolutions at the meeting was also that in community-based public schools, the usage/wearing of a common hijab/beret by female students should be permitted, although it was made optional for parents/students.

    The management of each school was saddled with the responsibility of determining the size and colour of the beret and hijab for uniformity.

     

  • Muslim students fault commissioner’s statement on Hijab

    Muslim students fault commissioner’s statement on Hijab

    The Lagos State Area Unit of the Muslim Students’ Society of Nigeria (MSSN) yesterday denied reaching an agreement with Commissioner for Education, Mrs Olayinka Oladunjoye, on the government’s ban of Hijab (women’s veil) in the state’s public schools.

    The Nation yesterday quoted Mrs Oladunjoye as saying that the decision to ban Hijab in Lagos public schools was a consensus reached at what she called a stakeholders’ meeting reportedly chaired by the Commissioner for Home Affairs and Culture, Mr Oyinlomo Danmole.

    A statement by the society’s Public Relations officer (PRO), Sulaimon Alamutu, said Mrs Oladunjoye was economical with the truth.

    The statement reads: “We want to state unequivocally that the claim of Mrs Oladunjoye was …an attempt to obstruct the course of justice.

    “The commissioner claimed in her statement that the MSSN representatives were at the so-called stakeholders’ meeting where the decision to ban Hijab was taken. This is ridiculous. How can we be demanding that the right of Muslims to use Hijab in schools be given them and at the same time consent to a ‘consensus’ that is antithetical to our demand? We were never invited for any meeting at any time!

    “Let us state here that the state government has reneged on its agreement to call us for dialogue since our mass protest on February 28, this year, at the Governor’s Office in Alausa. The government did not only renege on all the agreements but also ensured, through delay tactics, that the case is swept under the carpet.

    “The pronouncement by the commissioner is an afterthought and a flagrant disrespect for the rule of law. We have already served the government a court notice on the issue and Justice Oyewole of the State High Court has fixed May 27 for hearing. So, we wonder why the commissioner, who we believe knows the position of the law, would come out to make such a pronouncement. We are puzzled by her action.”

    MSSN urged Governor Babatunde Fashola to caution Mrs Oladunjoye before she destroys his administration’s reputation.