Tag: Jega

  • Let Jega be

    Let Jega be

    If the general election earlier fixed for February 14 had held as scheduled, many eligible Nigerians would have been denied the opportunity of voting for their preferred candidates.

    Despite the claim by the Chairman of the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Attahiru Jega, that his Commission was ready to conduct the election, it was apparent that the logistics for the nationwide exercise had not been perfected.

    The Permanent Voters Card (PVC) to replace the Temporary Voters Card (TVC) were not available in many centres. Despite public holidays declared by states governments to enable citizens collect their voting cards, INEC admitted that 48,098,000 out of 68.83m, representing 65 percent, had been collected as at the eve of the rescheduled election.

    As if to confirm the lapse in the production and distribution of the cards, many people, including some prominent persons, searched endlessly for their cards and had to re register when INEC owned up in some instances that the data earlier collected were lost.

    The training of ad-hoc staff had not been completed, while the use of the card reader was still a bit confusing.

    In a way, the postponement of the election based on lack of guarantee of security by the military was an opportunity for the INEC to perfect its arrangements for the election.

    Notwithstanding INEC’s shortcomings, there is no justification for the recent call on Jega to resign by the Southern Nigeria Peoples Assembly, led by Chief Edwin Clark and some other groups who are mainly supporters of President Goodluck Jonathan.

    The accusation against Jega that he has connived with northern leaders to rig Jonathan out of office is a wild claim which the group cannot substantiate.

    It is unfortunate that the Clark’s group which include senior citizens of the country who should be regarded as elder statesmen are leading a campaign of calumny against the chief electoral officer who has a track record of conducting free and fair elections that have been hailed across political divide in the past.

    While INEC’s preparations can be faulted this time around, his resignation at this crucial stage of the general election will rather complicate issues than solve the problem of having a smooth election in accordance with the constitutional provisions.

    Even if Jega offers to resign at this stage of election preparations, he would be guilty of sabotaging the electoral process. It is too late in the day for him to back out of the crucial exercise or be asked to leave over partisan allegations by those opposed to his conducting the election for ulterior motives.

    From all indications, the Jega-must-go proponents are acting a script to discredit the INEC boss to have reasons to fault the outcome of the election if their party loses at any level.

    Jega and his team have done fairly well in past elections that they should be given the benefit of the doubt to perfect whatever needs to be done ahead of the rescheduled March 28 election.

    Though President Jonathan has denied any plan to remove Jega, speculations have been on about the federal government’s plot to sack the INEC Chairman.

    The president will do well not to succumb to any pressure to move against Jega by his party members.

    Any attempt to send Jega on compulsory pre-retirement leave that will prevent him from conducting this election, will be counterproductive for the electoral future of the country.

  • No plan to sack Jega – FG

    The Federal Government has again denied the reports making the rounds that the Presidency planned to sack the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Attahiru Jega.

    All Progressive Congress senators had on Friday raised the alarm about a plot to force Jega to go on terminal leave next week.

    The general election has been rescheduled for March 28 and April 11.

    The polls were earlier slated for February 14 and 28 before INEC shifted the dates because of insecurity.

    But the supervising Minister of Information, Edem Duke, who based his defence on the recent assurance made by President Goodluck Jonathan during the last presidential media chat, said government has no plan to remove the INEC boss before the elections.

    Duke, who is also the minister of Culture and Tourism, however told journalists in Abuja that the INEC boss will leave office in accordance with the laid down service rules.

    He said: The issue of the INEC Chairman, I want to align myself with Mr. President on that matter. “

    Duke said it is natural for anybody who reaches the terminal date in service to leave.

     

  • Presidency plans Jega’s sack next week, say senators

    Presidency plans Jega’s sack next week, say senators

    All Progressives Congress (APC) senators yesterday raised the alarm about a plot to force Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman Prof. Attahiru Jega to go on terminal leave next week.

    The caucus said that the plot to force Jega out of office before the rescheduled Match 28 presidential election is being orchestrated by some members of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and some other people in high places.

    It said that those behind the scheme intended to carry out their plan next week by serving the INEC boss a letter from the office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation, directing him to proceed on terminal leave.

    The opposition lawmakers categorically said that President Goodluck Jonathan lacked the power to remove Jega under any guise without the consent of the Senate.

    The Minority Leader, Senator George Akume, who spoke on the alleged move to sack Jega at a news conference in Abuja warned that the plot would be resisted.

    Akume, who described the plot as unwarranted, said: “We oppose the removal (of Jega) because it is criminal, illegal and unconstitutional.”

    The Minority Leader underscored the fact that terminal leave is only applicable to core civil servants who run their civil service to retirement at 35 years of service or 60 years of age and not a definite tenure as in the case of Jega.

    To buttress his point, Akume referred to an Office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation’s memo dated 11th August, 2010, entitled “Re: Request for clarification on pre-retirement leave”, which states the categories of officers involved in pre-retirement leave.

    Paragraph two of the four – paragraph memo stated: “I am to further inform you that paragraph 1 of the Circular clarified  that the content of the Circular is only applicable to core officers who run their Civil Service to retirement at thirty-five (35) years of service or sixty (6o) years of age and not for a definite tenure as is the case under reference.”

    Akume said Jega’s removal, if he had done anything to warrant such action, could only be done with the consent of two-thirds majority vote of the Senate.

    Akume said: “Last time we spoke to you about the use of card readers among other critical issues, which are very germane to the conduct of the 2015 elections.

    “You will recall what we said that even a national daily made a comment on the use of card readers.

    “The paper said in its editorial that only dishonest politicians fear the use of card readers.

    “Today, we want to say that only dishonest politicians fear Jega as the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    “Nigeria is long over due for a credible election. We said it before and we want to repeat: if smaller countries like Ghana could do this perfectly well, why can’t Nigeria do it.

    “We oppose the removal because it is criminal, illegal and unconstitutional.

    “We oppose this removal through the back door because government itself knows that if Jega goes wrong, you have to remove him by using the Senate to take him out, but you know you require two-third and that is what they are running away from.

    “If you postpone elections and suddenly you say Jega should go, then Nigerians would have been deceived into taking it that elections were extended because there were no sufficient Permanent Voter Cards to enable everybody to vote.

    “Even on the issue of PVCs, you observe that over 70million have been distributed. It is for all of us to also do our own civic responsibility by getting these PVCs.

    “You don’t go and lay in your house and expect to collect the PVCs. It hasn’t got legs, so it cannot walk. It is not directed by a computer, so it will know and be able to locate where you live, but these things have been decentralised so that as many Nigerians as possible who are willing to take these cards and vote will do so.

    “You also know that even those who have collected may not vote on that day for their personal reasons. But on a daily basis, Jega is being hammered.

    “They say Jega is depriving over 10 million people of their right to vote. That is not true and we condemn what the government is trying to do and we want to appeal to all of you to rise up and defend our democracy.

    “Honestly, we said it before; this is the road to Golgotha, road to Armageddon. This people want to destroy this country completely.

    “Today this country is broke and it is not because of Jega. People who are responsible are there and they are friends of government. Nigerians want peace, not pieces. “

    Senator Danjuma Goje (Gombe Central) said that the constitution is clear that Jega is not a civil servant.

    His words: “How Jega was appointed is also clear. The Senate has to approve and the removal is going to follow same process and we are waiting. Any other means of removing Jega will be unconstitutional and will be rejected.”

  • Power to sack Jega beyond Jonathan

    SIR: We must never permit a situation of having to lock the stable door after the horse has bolted. The constitution is clear and unambiguous: the process of removal of the Chairman of INEC, according to Section 157 of the 1999 Constitution, starts from the Senate and ends with the President.

    The impression conveyed to the public by President Goodluck Jonathan during the Wednesday, February 11, media chat was that he could hire and fire the chairman of INEC at any time. No sir. Such power does not reside in the presidency.

    Even if the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission were to commit a criminal offence today, such as murder, he can be arrested by the police and prosecuted, since he enjoys no immunity, but the President has no constitutional power to either constructively remove him through suspension or sack him outright on account of that criminal act. Indeed, I find it ludicrous when some lawmakers claim they suspend the Speaker of a House of Assembly. The fact is, there is no such provision for the suspension of a Speaker. Suspension and removal amount to the same thing, in that he will not function in the said office during the period of suspension. No such is ever envisaged by the framers of the constitution. If he has committed any gross misconduct, he can be removed by two-thirds majority of the entire House. I am aware of the Public Service Rules, the House Rules, etc., but these are subordinate to the Constitution.

    The power of the President to appoint or dismiss the chairman of INEC, NJC, NPC, etc. is not only limited but circumscribed by the fact that he shall consult the National Council of State for appointment and obtain confirmation of the Senate, and in the case of removal secure, first, the concurrence of at least two-thirds majority of the Senate. The language employed by the constitution is that the process of removal should commence from the Senate – unlike the process of appointment which should begin from the President. Therefore, the President should be well-guided and not act in ignorance or defiance of the provisions of the constitution.

    Buoyed by his getting away with constructive removal of the former CBN governor, Mallam Lamido Sanusi, from office through suspension, the President erroneously believes that he can do the same for federal executive bodies listed in Section 153 of the 1999 Constitution. No sir; that’s a no-go-area.

    But then impunity begets impunity. Under what constitutional power did the President remove Chief Festus Odumegwu, the then chairman of the National Population Commission? Did the process commence from the Upper House? Did the Senate debate let alone vote on his removal? But we all kept quiet then; so why not attempt other infractions if you could get away with one act of impunity? But it is time to say thus far and no further to the President. Acting against the constitution is tantamount to treason.

    We must warn against a situation where the President will attempt to unconstitutionally dismiss the chairmen of INEC, NPC, NJC, etc. and then ask anyone that is not satisfied to go to court. That will amount to high treason. The constitution is clear: the process of removal of the chairman of INEC, according to Section 157, starts from the Senate and ends with the President. The purpose of Section 157 is to insulate the all-important bodies like INEC, CCB, NPC, RMAFC, etc. from vagaries of politics and political interference from the President. The polity should no longer permit any acts of impunity that may bring down the edifice of this nation.

     

    • Opeyemi Soyombo,

    Abeokuta, Ogun State.

  • APC Senators raise alarm over plot to sack Jega

    APC Senators raise alarm over plot to sack Jega

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) caucus in the Senate on Thursday raised the alarm about a plot to force the Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Attahiru Jega, to go on terminal leave next week.

    The caucus said the unholy plot to force Jega out of office before the reschedule Match 28 presidential election, is being orchestrated by some members of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and some other people in high places.

    It said that those behind the scheme intended to carry out their plan next week by serving the INEC boss a letter from the office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation, directing him to proceed on terminal leave.

    The opposition lawmakers categorically said that President Goodluck Jonathan lacked the power to remove Jega under any guise without the consent of the Senate.
    The Minority Leader, Senator George Akume, who spoke on the alleged move to sack Jega at a press briefing in Abuja, warned that the plot would be comprehensively resisted.

    Akume, who described the plot as unwarranted, insisted that “we oppose the removal (of Jega) because it is criminal, illegal and unconstitutional.”

    The Senate minority leader underscored the fact that terminal leave is only applicable to core civil servants who run their Civil Service to retirement at 35 years of service or 60 years of age and not in a case of definite tenure like that of Jega.

    To buttress his point, Akume referred to Office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation’s memo dated August 11, 2010 entitled: “Re: Request for clarification on pre-retirement leave” which stated the categories of officer that involved in pre-retirement leave.

     

  • Jega meets NSA team, others today on state of security

    Jega meets NSA team, others today on state of security

    Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman Prof. Attahiru Jega will today hold a stock-taking meeting with a team from the Office of the National Security Adviser, the military and para-military organisations on security, for the general elections.

    Today’s session with the military is the first since the were postponed on February 7.

    The elections will now hold on March 28 and April 11.

    A top source in INEC, who spoke in confidence with our correspondent, said: “We are holding an Inter-agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES) session to update ourselves on the state of the nation’s security and the electoral commission’s preparedness.

    “This is the first meeting we are having since the polls shift  due to security reasons. All the parties will lay the cards on the table and consider what still ought to be done.”

    “ICCES is chaired by the National Security Adviser. The INEC chairman is co-chair. Others are representatives of the Defence Headqurters (DHQ), Army, Air Force, Navy, Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), Directorate of State Security (DSS), Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Commission (NSCDC), Customs Service, Immigration Service, Fire Service and Nigeria Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).”

    Another source said: “We want to know the status of the security in the Northeast. We do not want to wait till the last minute. All the National Commissioners of INEC are also expected to be in attendance.

    “This explains why this session is called in the early part of the second week of the six-week window for the postponement of the elections.

    “Nigerians and the international community are eager to know how far we have addressed the security challenges in the affected areas.

    “Expectedly, we will also brief the session on the number of Permanent Voters Cards collected, the training of 600,000 ad hoc staff on the use of Card Readers and the feedback from the monitoring of preparations for the poll in all the six geo-political zones.”

    There were indications last night that INEC might restrict the military and Mobile Police to fringe posts during the general elections.

    A National Commissioner said: “Military men have no role in the conduct of the elections; they are only expected to stay at designated checkpoints to make sure people do not traffic arms, ammunition or anything that could tamper with the electoral process.

    “They also stay at these checkpoints in readiness for rapid deployment, if there is any security challenge during the elections. No soldiers will be at the Polling Units, Collation Centres or have any direct contact with the conduct of the elections. Even the Mobile Police will only engage in fringe patrols without coming to the Polling Units. This is our position.”

    The INEC chairman announced the poll shift based on advisory from security and intelligence services.

  • The world is watching Jega

    IR: Numerous reactions, domestic and foreign, have trailed the monumental event of Saturday, February 7, when Professor Attahiru Jega, the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), announced the postponement of the general elections from February 14 and 28 to March 28 and April 11.

    Numerous questions have also been asked, including the following:

    • Was INEC truly ready to conduct the general elections from February 14 as previously scheduled?

    • Why had over 700,000 ad hoc INEC staff not been fully mobilized and trained for the elections, prior to the postponement?

    • Why had the card readers not been fully procured, pre-tested and made ready for the elections, a few days to the e-day?

    • What accounts for the obvious lopsided distribution and collection of the Permanent Voters’ Cards (PVCs) as have been widely reported in the media – with a mega-state like Lagos recording barely 38% while Kaduna State recorded 87%, and strife-torn Borno State, with thousands of internally displaced persons, achieved 80%?

    These questions – and many more like them – cannot simply be swept under the carpet. Indeed, getting the elections right on March 28 and April 11 will depend a great deal on how these critical questions are addressed by all concerned persons, agencies and institutions.

    The reactions of the international community have also been varied – and should also be evaluated dispassionately.

    Apart from the United States which expressed its deep disappointment over the decision to postpone the general elections due to security concerns, and condemned what it called political interference with INEC, other major countries, global organizations and regional blocs showed more understanding of the circumstances surrounding the postponement of the elections.

    To underscore the strategic importance of Nigeria – and of happenings in Nigeria – in the comity of nations, the UN Secretary-General, Mr. Ban Ki-moon, reportedly telephoned both President Jonathan and General Buhari after the rescheduling of the Nigerian general elections. The Secretary General noted the decision of the Nigerian Independent Electoral Commission to postpone the general elections and urged the electoral authorities to take all necessary measures, such as the rapid distribution of the remaining Permanent Voter Cards, to enable all eligible citizens, including those displaced, to exercise their right to vote in a timely manner.

    The Secretary General hoped that the elections would meet the high expectations of the Nigerian people and the international community.

    These reactions of the international community have been generally positive – underscoring the need for all stakeholders to accept the postponement in good faith and use the intervening period to ensure the conduct of a free, fair and credible general election, while maintaining fidelity to the presidential inauguration date of May 29.

    Overall, apart from the serious security concerns in the North-east, it is obvious that INEC was ill-prepared to conduct the elections on February 14 because over a third (34%) of all registered voters were yet to get their permanent voters cards prior to the postponement.

    In addition, as widely reported in the media, the training and simulation exercises for INEC officials and thousands of ad hoc staff on how to use the card readers for the permanent voters’ cards during the polls had not been conducted. The training manuals were not ready while simulations for the card readers had not been conducted.

    Professor Jega has built a solid reputation for integrity over the years, especially with the widely acclaimed successful conduct of the 2011 general elections. Jega should not allow himself – and his previous achievements and reputation – to be rubbished by the obviously shoddy preparations for the 2015 general elections.

     

    •  Kelechi Onyemaobi
  • Jega to brief Senate over polls’ delay

    THE Senate yesterday summoned the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, to brief it on the circumstances that made him to postpone the February 14 and 28 general elections. The invitation of Jega, however, attracted sharp criticisms from opposition senators, who said that Service chiefs who were instrumental to the election postponement, should also be invited to explain why they used the issue of security to force postponement of the polls. The Senate also said  Jega would be made to demonstrate the workings and deployment of the card readers This followed a motion by the Senate Leader, Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba,  who prayed the Senate to invite the INEC chairman to brief the Senate at plenary on the issues and others related to the commission’s preparedness for the conduct of the 2015 elections. According to Ndoma-Egba, the Senate must mandate the commission to demonstrate the workings of the card reader and its deployment to senators. After narrating the background to the election postponement, the senator  pleaded:  “I, therefore, move that this distinguished Senate do invite the chairman of the INEC to brief this distinguished Senate at plenary on the issues and various other issues related to its preparedness for the conduct of the 2015 elections and that secondly, the commission be made to demonstrate the workings of the card reader and its deployment before this distinguished Senate.” But, the Minority Leader, Senator George Akume, who sought amendment of the motion, noted that though they have no objection to the invitation of Jega, Service chiefs, who claimed they could not provide security for the elections, should also be invited. Akume said: “We have no objection to the invitation of the chairman of the INEC on this matter of postponement, which is a very sensitive issue. “But we also want to add that in inviting Jega, we should also invite those who wrote advising him that because of their inadequacy to provide security for the exercise, the exercise should not hold. “It is important because Jega had spoken before that he was ready to go ahead with the elections. Jega was ready until he was overruled. “Mr. President, the National Security adviser, who first started this issue of postponement in London, raised a major issue that the distribution of PVCs was behind schedule and that so many people had not been availed the opportunity to collect the PVCs. “The issue of providing security cover was not the reason advanced for possible postponement. Eventually, this became an issue. I say it is sensitive because time is of the essence. “We want to hear from them why they cannot provide security for an exercise that will last for only a day or two.” Senate President, David Mark, ruled that the Senate should invite Jega in the first instance and hear from him. Mark added that after hearing from Jega, if it became necessary, the Service chiefs would also be invited. The lawmakers thereafter resolved that Jega should appear before the Senate in plenary today by 11 am.

  • Better be speculations

    •Any attempt to suspend or remove Jega will not stand

    In spite of persistent denial, even by President Goodluck Jonathan, the speculation that the Federal Government may be contemplating to send Professor Attahiru Jega, Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), on forced terminal leave from March 1 or cause his outright replacement  before the expiration of his tenure, continues to gain momentum. The presidency is purportedly disenchanted with the reasons adduced by INEC for postponing the general elections.

    Despite Prof. Jega’s debunking, through Kayode Idowu, his chief press secretary, of his rumoured resignation when he said: “Jega is busy preparing for the elections and you are asking about terminal leave. Does anyone planning to conduct elections go on terminal leave? There is nothing like that,” we still believe that the issue should not be treated with levity.

    We know from the antecedent of the impunities of the current administration that the issue of Jega being sent on terminal leave is not beyond the president. The presidency that could, without recourse to extant law, remove Sanusi Lamido Sanusi as Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governor for blowing the lid off the allegedly missing $20billion crude oil money, can go to any length on the Jega matter.

    Since the postponement of the elections from February 14 and 28 to March 28 and April 11, respectively, the polity has avoidably been over-heated. The target of the PDP and the presidency has been Jega that the ruling government plans to ambush so as to stampede him out of office so that a pliant man could be picked as replacement for him before the rescheduled dates of the elections. Succeeding with this infamous plan will definitely de-legitimise the results of the elections generally and probably lay the foundation for a constitutional crisis that might elongate the speculated stay-in-power plan of President Jonathan.

    We would not subscribe to the idea or any attempt, whether overt or covert, by the government to overthrow the constitution. Something drastic has to be done to truncate the on-going deliberate official attempt to discredit Jega and by extension INEC, as the rescheduled March/April elections approach. At a period when all hands should be on deck in ensuring hitch-free elections, it is sad that distracting speculations are rife about possible replacement for the INEC chairman in the person of Professor Femi Mimiko. We expect Prof Mimiko to dissociate himself from such speculation. His silence on this issue, in view of its national significance and timing, is quite disturbing.

    This country, especially her government must give serious thoughts to how enduring institutions are built in other climes. For instance, in other countries, the head of an electoral institution barely appears in the public domain except where such appearance becomes compelling. But here, the henchman of the electoral commission has become a routine figure in the media for mostly the wrong reasons, and orchestrated largely by the ruling party. Unlike Professor Maurice Iwu, whose tenure as INEC chairman was marred with scandals, that of Jega, despite his shortcomings, has been quite an improvement over that better forgotten Iwu era. And he should be encouraged to foster more progress on that path in the coming elections rather than be persecuted by the ruling party.

    As far as we are concerned, Jega has not been found guilty of any serious misconduct to warrant his being forced to go on terminal leave. Moreover, he has the serious task of conducting the forthcoming general elections to a conclusive end. He should be left to concentrate on his job, as anything contrary could only be tantamount to an attempt to avoidably destroy democracy in the country.

     

  • How Jega became the devil

    How Jega became the devil

    If you are looking for evidence of disarray within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) ranks, look no further than the mixed signals it is sending over how it views its newest bête noire – chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Attahiru Jega.

    Party chairman, Adamu Muazu, now says the ruling party has absolute confidence in Jega’s ability to organise free and fair elections. Coming against the backdrop of the demonisation of the man by leading members of PDP – like head of the Presidential Campaign Council, Ahmadu Ali, spokesman, Femi Fani-Kayode and Ijaw leader, Chief Edwin Clark, this conciliatory statement was a tad suspicious.

    It was reminiscent of the public show of support that some owners of struggling English Premier League clubs often extend to their embattled managers. Perhaps it was to lull the unsuspecting fellows into a false sense of security. More often than not, days after receiving the dreaded vote of confidence they get the sack.

    Predictably, Muazu was calling Jega a liar twenty four hours later when he received a delegation of Africa Union (AU) election observers in Abuja.

    One of the buzzwords of the Goodluck Jonathan administration is ‘transformation.’ After the theatrics of the last fortnight, I now concede that PDP is truly the party of ‘uncommon transformation’. In a matter of weeks they have managed to convince themselves – only – that the mild-mannered Jega is a devil with two horns.

    How this dramatic transformation has come about remains a mystery. But the relationship has so deteriorated that Clark and his group not only demanded the INEC chief’s resignation but also his arrest. Some so-called ‘Goodluck Jonathan Lagos Grassroots’ group has been placing full-page advertisements in newspapers listing what it considers evidence of the electoral umpire’s bias. The adverts usually end with an earnest prayer or wish for his resignation.

    This is the same man that supervised the enthronement of Jonathan as president in 2011 even when his chief rival, Muhammadu Buhari, was crying that the polls were rigged.

    He is the same fellow who oversaw the Ekiti State 2014 governorship polls. When Fayose ‘defeated’ Fayemi the commission was lauded even when only 476,870 prospective voters, representing 64.98 percent were eligible to vote in the exercise.

    INEC in the state received 732,166 Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) for distribution but only 476,870 were collected. Out of this, approximately 65% that were eligible voters even less – 360, 455 – not up to 50% of those on the roll, took up the option of exercising their rights. PDP didn’t quibble about statistics back then; they joyfully claimed ‘victory’.

    Now the party’s Presidential Campaign Organisation is demanding 100% PVC distribution as the basis for assessing INEC’s success or failure. In 2014 in Ekiti, 65% was wonderful, in 2015 that level of card release has become not only unacceptable; it is evidence of Jega’s partiality.

    Although he has firmly stated that the polls earlier slated for February were shifted on the strength of a letter written to him by Service Chiefs demanding a six-week postponement, the ruling party insists on pushing its version of events that it was also down to the commission not being prepared.

    Well, PDP got its postponement, but it harvested widespread condemnation for forcing it through at gunpoint. Hell hath no fury like a drowning incumbent or party – especially when handed a pyrrhic victory. The speed with which the military high command rushed out its pledge of ‘neutrality’ after the contentious shift, underscores how damaging the military’s meddling has been for the powers-that-be.

    Jega would have been crowned with a halo by now if only he had sung from the ruling party’s smeared hymn sheet and accepted his commission was unprepared. Unfortunately, the professor doesn’t do political karaoke!

    In the hands of the PDP, the INEC boss has now been conferred with a special talent for ubiquity that only a Nigerian equivalent of the Scarlet Pimpernel can manage. He’s been seen by ruling party agents – here, there and everywhere. Today, when he isn’t holding meetings with the Northern Elders Forum (NEF), he is closeted with All Progressives Congress (APC) top shots in the agreeable environs of Dubai to plot the best way to ease Buhari into Aso Rock. That is according to the spooks at Legacy House.

    He has, according to PDP, come up with a scheme that has ensured that PVCs were distributed in such a way that they all landed in APC strongholds. Only a ‘naughty’ professor could have pulled that off.

    As though his litany of sins were not enough to send him on pre-retirement leave immediately, Jega has suddenly developed a suspicious fondness for technology. It is enough to infuriate any patriot who’s not a supporter of the opposition.

    Why can’t we return to the perfect 2011 TVCs since many haven’t received Temporary Voters Cards (TVCs), the PDP has asked? Never mind that only PVCs were used in the Osun and Ekiti elections and no one asked for Jega and his team to be strung up on trees.

    And what is this strange device called the card reader which would require a team of nuclear scientists from NASA to test properly before they can be used by dim witted Nigerian voters? The fact that we all use ATM machines, debit and credit cards, is no reason to burden us with such sophisticated things as PVCs. Truly, Jega must be a devilish alien sent to cause confusion in Nigeria.

    But hang on for a minute. Didn’t Jonathan promise at his Lagos rally that he was now going to fight corruption with technology? His team was probably tuned to a different frequency. If our great leader is now a convert to technology, why are his people still unbelievers – rooted in the dark ages?

    Indeed, Jonathan has even boasted that it was under his watch that Nigerians first started bothering about voters’ card. Before him, I suspect, voters were probably content with identifying themselves using palm fronds. Truly, a president with many firsts!

    In the past, opposition parties were usually the ones to moan about the partiality and incompetence of INEC and its predecessors. For the first time ever a government in power is rolling out its entire machinery to demonise and destroy the electoral arbiter. For me, it is a sign that the commission’s leadership is inching in the direction of impartiality.

    When the elections finally hold on March 28 and April 11, they will not be perfect. There would be much for all sides to criticise. The losers in this bitter contest are bound to end up in court. However, I find it interesting that PDP is setting such standards for INEC before it would accept the results of the coming polls.

    Among other things, it is demanding that every registered voter must have a PVC – even those who refuse to make the effort to go and pick up theirs; every card reader must be proven to be functioning; better still, let’s go back to TVCs; it even wants to get into the commission’s internal administrative arrangements to ensure that APC sympathisers are not in the majority!

    What is sauce for Jega should be sauce for Jonathan. Perhaps we should apply the same high standards set for INEC to assess the PDP’s presidential candidate. Before he can be reelected Nigerians want 24 hour electricity, perfectly tarred federal roads in cities and nicely-finished inter-state highways.

    We also demand the return of all Nigerian territories seized by insurgents – in other words, the country as Jonathan received it in 2011; the return of the abducted Chibok girls unharmed; pipe borne water; health care in every hamlet, a 10% drop in crime rate; single-digit inflation rate; single-digit unemployment rate etc – just to mention a few things on our shopping list. Good luck Jonathan!