Tag: June 12

  • Ambode, Oyebode, Falana, others want June 12 declared as Democracy Day

    Ambode, Oyebode, Falana, others want June 12 declared as Democracy Day

    Eminent Nigerians Friday called on the Federal Government to declare June 12 Democracy Day, in place of May 29, so as to immortalize late Chief Moshood Kolawole Abiola and the spirit of the June 12 struggle.

    Among those who led the call include Lagos State Governor, Mr. Akinwunmi Ambode; Professor of International Law and Jurisprudence, Akin Oyebode; Human Right Lawyer, Femi Falana and former Commissioner for Information in Lagos, Dele Alake.

    Their request was the focus of their remarks at the commemoration of the 22nd anniversary of June 12, 1993 Presidential Election in Lagos, Friday, where they unanimously agreed that the declaration was the best national recognition that could be accorded the struggle.

    At the well attended symposium organised by the Lagos State Government in collaboration with the June 12 Coalition of Democratic Formations, at the Lagos Television (LTV) Blue Roof, Agidingbi, Lagos, Ambode noted that the June 12 date would forever remain unique on the calendar, describing it as a date that has assumed a life of its own.

    He said it was a day where the people of Nigeria trooped out to the polling booth to reclaim their rights and ‎privileges as a people.

    According to him, “June 12 symbolises the patriotic and nationalistic spirit in all Nigerians. On June 12, we showed that irrespective of class or political sympathy, we would always join hands to respect our national values.”

    Ambode said though the peoples’ hope was dashed with the annulled election, presumably won by Abiola, “June 12 stands as the real democracy day which was sanctioned by the blood of martyrs who laid down their lives for this democracy.”

    Continuing, he said: “We shall not forget them; they will always be with us. As we continue to march on and sustain democratic governance, we would enhance and empower the well being of our people.

    “The outcome of this year’s general elections has proven that the lessons of June 12, 1993 have been fruitful. I urge you all to take some time and ‎reflect on the democratic journey that we have commenced for the benefit of all of us.

    “Should we abdicate our responsibilities and allow personal interest and agenda to truncate our journey? We owe it as a duty to immortalize the memories of our fallen compatriots and deepen our democracy to sustain us as a people of destiny‎,” Ambode said.

    Prof. Akin Oyebode, who was the chairman of the occasion, said the day was a celebration of die-hard spirit of Abiola, his wife Kudirat and hundreds of Nigerians that were killed in protest of annulment of the freest and fairest election ever held in the country.

    Oyebode said it was sad and almost inconceivable that the politicians and the military decided to make May 29 Democracy Day.

    “It must be said that without June 12, 1993, we would never have had May 29, 1999. We know that even as enemies of democracy try to thwart the idea, the sacrifice of MKO Abiola and of Nigerians who took to the streets should never be forgotten,” he said.

    Oyebode added that it was unfortunate that the June 12 watershed has been ethnicised, with some states in the South west already marking it as a holiday, while others were still not bothered.

    He said it was also amazing that Nigeria named monuments in Abuja and Stadium in Kano after military junta Sanni Abacha, while Abiola has not been immortalized as so deserved.

    “Abiola remains a hero, even as June 12 has conscientised Nigerians that no power or effort can stop the will of the people united. MKO Abiola is the precursor of the ‘change’ we have today, given his idea of ‘farewell to poverty.’ To continue to ethnicise such date is a disservice to Nigeria. I think the time is now ripe for Nigeria to demonstrate their commitment to democracy and truly declare June 12 as a national holiday,” he said.

    Apparently in agreement with earlier speakers, Falana said the onus was on Federal Government to immortalize the true heroes of Nigeria’s democracy.

    Falana said: “This day (June 12) must be a national day and be declared a national holiday.”

    He appealed to Lagos State to further champion the course of deepening democracy, by ensuring that living heroes and heroines of June 12 struggle are not forgotten.

    Alake, who was the Editor of defunct Concord Newspapers and a close associate of late Abiola, in his lecture said June 12, was a day Nigerians were rebirthed as a true nation-state, adding that the annulment was the biggest damage ever done to the country.

    He saluted the courage of June 12 activists like Frank Kokori, Ayo Opadokun, Alfred Ilenre, Dr. Amos Akingba, Rear Admiral Ndubuisi Kanu, Odion Akhaine and Segun Mayegun among others that were also present at the event

  • Amosun to FG: Declare Abiola winner of June 12 polls

    Amosun to FG: Declare Abiola winner of June 12 polls

    Governor Ibikunle Amosun on Friday urged the Federal government to officially declare Chief Moshood Abiola the winner of the June 12, 1993 Presidential election.

    Amosun said that is the way to honour Abiola for the supreme price, the late politician and business magnate, paid to enthrone the democracy being enjoyed in Nigeria today.

    The Governor who spoke during a novelty match between former Abiola Babes players and the state’s All Star Players at the M.K.O Abiola Stadium, Abeokuta, said declaring Abiola the winner is not too much for a man who sacrificed everything for the nation’s democracy.

    The novelty match was part of activities used by the Ogun state government to commemorate the annulled June 12, 1993 Presidential polls adjudged to be the most credible in the annals of Nigeria and presumed to have been won by Abiola.

    He also charged politicians and leaders to work collectively in their various capacities towards delivering the dividends of democracy to Nigerians as mark of honour to  Abiola, describing him as a “politcal martyr.”

    According to Amosun, the nation’s politicians and leaders should be selfless in their practice of politics.

    He noted that Nigerians ought to keep reminding themselves of the sacrifices made by Chief MKO Abiola for the country to survive particularly the democracy being enjoyed.

    The Governor said his administration would continue to honor the great Icon and uphold his lofty ideals.

    Amongst the players are; Olu of Itori, Oba Akorede Akamo, Former players of Abiola Babes- Friday Ekpo, Tajudeen Disu amongst others.

  • ‘June 12 challenges us to guard our democracy‘

    ‘June 12 challenges us to guard our democracy‘

    ALL Progressives Congress (APC) National Leader Asiwaju Bola Tinubu has urged Nigerians to jealously guard the nation’s burgeoning democracy, in the spirit of the June 12, 1993 Struggle.

    In his goodwill message to lovers of democracy on the 25th anniversary of the annulment of a presidential election, adjudged to be the most freest and credible, Asiwaju Tinubu said the greatest honour Nigerians can give to the late Chief MKO Abiola is to protect the present dispensation from being scuttled by fifth columnists.

    The message titled: “June 12 challenges us to guard our democracy,” reads: “As we remember the June 12 struggle, we are challenged to guard our hard-won democratic freedom and prevent any hijack or abuse of the very principles of constitutional democracy.

    “This anniversary offers us another reminder that this country is one set for greatness. Chief Moshood Abiola the symbol of June 12 struggle is one of the greatest Nigerian to ever live.

    “Through his life, we glean selfless service and commitment to people. Through his political struggle, we glean courage and incorrigible commitment to principles of the just, free and humane society.

    “Today, our democracy thrives on the selfless sacrifices he made. His politics was without bitterness and rancor.  His patriotism was devoid of tribal marks and nepotism.

    “It will be said, here lies a man who did his duty on earth; it is what we should all strive for. We owe it to Abiola and all the fallen patriots of the June 12 struggle to make sure our democracy never falters and this current government succeeds.

    “We must also make sure that the People remain the focus of our policy and politics. This is the commitment the new APC government has made to the people of this great country and by Gods grace we intend to keep it under the leadership of President Muhammadu Buhari.”

  • ‘No June 12, no Nigeria’

    Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly Mudasiru Obasa has described the June 12, 1993 presidential election as “the mother of the present democratic dispensation in Nigeria”.

    Obasa said without the election, it would have been difficult for Nigerians to enjoy democracy.

    The Speaker said it has become imperative for Nigerians to not only celebrate the historic event but also reflect on its significance.

    “It was a major political event in Nigeria’s history and it deserves to be celebrated.

    “It was the harbinger of the present day democracy.  It was the fairest, freest and most accepted election ever not only in Nigeria but also in Africa. June 12 is thus the mother of our present democracy.

    “It was June 12 that gave birth to May 29, which is being celebrated as Democracy Day.

    “For us in Lagos State and other states marking the anniversary, it is the day Nigerians got their independence from the military, it is our Democracy Day.”

  • June 12

    June 12

    •Time to officially acknowledge Abiola’s aborted presidency and draw closure on this historic injustice

    On June 12, 1993, the late Moshood Kashimawo Abiola, business mogul and plucky philanthropist, won the Nigerian presidency. But the denial of that mandate and the ensuing resistance almost brought Nigeria to her knees. Until Chief Abiola’s presidency is officially acknowledged, the ghost of that treachery will continue to haunt the polity.

    Unlike the March 28 presidential election, where destructive campaign on hate, faith and ethnicity nearly tore the country apart, on June 12, 1993, Nigerians eschewed religion, ethnicity and other divisive tendencies. The election, the best ever in Nigerian history, simply gave power to a man, North, South, East or West, perceived best for the job: to lead Nigeria from military ruin to the democratic rebirth.

    But then came the Ibrahim Babangida military junta’s “annulment” (until then, a strange word in the Nigerian troubled political lexicon); which ensured MKO never served his presidential term. Worse: he served his four-year term in gaol, under detention by the usurping Gen. Sani Abacha.

    Abiola’s “crime” was declaring himself lawfully elected president of Nigeria, at an event called the Epetedo Declaration in Lagos, on June 12, 1994. Abacha arrested him for “treason”.  Abiola never made it out alive, as he died, under mysterious circumstances, on July 7, 1998, on the reported virtual eve of his release. Abacha himself had died a month earlier on June 8, 1998. Kudirat Abiola, one of Abiola’s wives and foremost campaigner for the mandate had earlier, on June 4, 1996, been assassinated in Lagos by agents of the Abacha government.

    So, for winning a free election, Abiola and wife died in the ensuing struggle. Their children also became untimely orphans. That is a monumental blot on Nigeria’s institutional conscience; and a savage siege on her institutional memory.

    Ernest Shonekan, a former managing director of UAC Nigeria Plc, was appointed interim head of state, by the exiting Gen. Babangida, following the post-annulment crisis. But a court later ruled his government illegal, since he neither staged a successful coup nor won an election. Though Abacha, who shoved Shonekan aside would later, with a decree, revalidate Chief Shonekan’s tenure, each time Shonekan parades himself as “former head of state”, the harsh depth of injury to Abiola resurfaces. That would continue to haunt the country, and the principal actors in that plot, Babangida and Shonekan, as far as they live.

    There is even a continuing institutional but fraudulent anti-Abiola campaign, hiding behind crass legalism but which is no more than plain sophistry. It is the phrase, repeated mostly as programmed cliché by the media: that Abiola “was presumed to have won” the June 12, 1993 election. It is the ugly face of a country wilfully telling itself a blatant lie.

    It is true the official results of the June 12, 1993 election were not fully released. But that was exactly why the annulment was criminal. Still, the results were public knowledge — already declared and ratified at polling centres nationwide. Humphrey Nwosu, the professor who was National Electoral Commission (NEC) chairman during the election, confirmed that much in a book he later released. Besides, arguing that because a final result was not officially announced is tantamount that no one won that election is akin to saying because a child is not christened, that child was not born. It is not only disingenuous, it is plain stupid.

    But the long and short of this matter: on another anniversary of Abiola’s stalled mandate, Nigeria must come to terms with, and make amends for, the grave injustice done this eminent Nigerian — and the Nigerian electorate.

    For starters, the new Buhari Presidency should set in motion processes to officially recognise Abiola as an elected president, who nevertheless was brutally denied his rights. That should come with an official apology.

    We also suggest June 12 be declared a national holiday, on which nationwide activities should be organised to underscore the inviolability of the vote, in free and fair elections, as the very minimum for democracy to thrive. In the alternative, Eagle Square, Abuja, could be renamed MKO Abiola Square, such that each time national and Democracy Day celebrations are being held there, the spirit of Abiola would roll with the occasion.

    Nigeria will do well to bring the June 12 injustice to fair closure. It is high time we dealt with that dirty past, so we can, with a clean mind, face a challenging future, of equity, fairness and justice.

  • June 12: How should Abiola be immortalized?

    June 12: How should Abiola be immortalized?

    Twenty-two years after the late Chief Moshood Abiola won the historic June 12, 1993 presidential election the man who paid the supreme price by dying as a martyr for democracy remains largely unsung. In the light of the popular yearning to give the country a new direction, what are the ways to properly recognize the late businessman and politician, Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI, asks.

    Are Nigerians likely to witness a change of attitude from the Federal Government with regards to the recognition of June 12 as a unique day in the political history of the country? Would President Muhammadu Buhari honour the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola, the alleged financier of the coup that sent him packing 30 years ago? These are some of the questions that may agitate the minds of some discerning Nigerians, as the country marks the 22nd anniversary of the historic presidential election of June 12, 1993, when Nigerians waved aside ethnic and religious differences to vote for the late Chief MKO Abiola in the electoral contest that was annulled by the military led by the then Head of State, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, popularly known as IBB.

    A United States-based Nigerian and legal practitioner, Mr. Owolabi Alaba, said if Buhari does that, he would be seen as the change that Nigerians all over the world can believe in.  He said: “It would be like Mandela forgiving the apartheid regime in South Africa. If he did, Buhari will be more popular in the Southwest than any politician. It is the right thing to do. June 12 is the day Gen. Babangida fought against Nigerians and lost and had to step aside.”

    Two years ago, the immediate past Goodluck Jonathan administration attempted to immortalize Abiola by announcing the renaming of the University of Lagos as Moshood Abiola University. But, in what must go down as one of the greatest ironies of Nigerian history, what should have marked the highpoint of nearly two decades of democratic struggle for the recognition of one of the most iconic symbols of Nigeria’s democratic journey was received with mixed feelings by many who had looked forward to such recognition.

    Given the fact that the March 28 presidential election is widely regarded as a re-enactment of the June 12 magic and also because many of those in the vanguard for the struggle for the official recognition of June 12 and Abiola’s contribution to the present democracy are part of the new administration, the time may be auspicious to immortalize the widely acclaimed winner of the June 12 election. Like June 12, two major parties dominated the March 28 presidential election. As witnessed during the March 28 presidential election, the current de facto two-party system reduced ethnic coloration and religious sentiment, as the de jure two-party system of 1993 did.

    Against this background, what would be the appropriate way to immortalize the late Abiola? One of the most recurring suggestions is that June 12 should replace May 29 as the Democracy Day. For instance, Alaba echoed that when he said: “If June 12 is confirmed at the Democracy Day, IBB will constantly remember the evil he committed with the death of Abiola. If Buhari rises above the anger and his treatment by the manipulative government of IBB and recognizes the contribution of M.K.O Abiola to the fruits of democracy he enjoys today, he would be seen as the change that Nigerians all over the world can believe in.”

    For years now, seven states have declared June 12 as public holiday to accord due recognition to the 1993 presidential election. The states are: Lagos, Edo, Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti, and Oyo. What these states have in common is that they are states governed by governors under the platform of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), one of the three major political parties that metamorphosed into the All Progressives Congress (APC) about two years ago.

    The Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP), which until May 29, 2015 had been the ruling party at the centre since 1999, had turned deaf ears to entreaties that June 12 should replace May 29 as Democracy Day. Now that the APC has become the ruling party at the federal level, is it likely to declare June 12 a national public holiday and a day to celebrate democracy?

    Beyond that, there are many other fundamental suggestions. The founding Secretary-General of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) and the Convener of the Coalition of Democrats for Electoral Reforms (CODER), Mr. Ayo Opadokun, is of the view that through the collaborative efforts of the executive and the legislature, one or two concrete steps should be taken to give the late businessman and politician a posthumous national honour and award. He said: “That is after they must have officially pronounced him as the winner of that election. They can now go to the next level of immortalising his name. For instance, there should be institution where the role of Abiola will be sufficiently crystallised.”

    Civil society activist and President Nigeria Voters Assembly (VOTAS), Mashood Erubami, agrees. He said process of immortalisation of the late Chief Abiola should start from his recognition as a winner in that election by the Buhari administration because his election victory was a re-incarnation of the principle of oneness of Nigerians witnessed during the June 12, 1993 election.

    In the spirit of reconciliation, Erubami wants the Buhari administration to organize a special posthumous installation ceremony where the late Abiola would be officially recognized as a former President of Nigeria. This posthumous ceremony, he said, should be organized in conjunction with the family of the late Abiola and members of the human rights and pro-democracy community that fought gallantly for the de-annulment of that election and it should be witnessed by governors of the states that constitute the Southwest and other guests from across the nation. He added that it is imperative for the event to be telecast live on television and radio.

    Erubami added: “This should be followed by the inclusion of his names and photographs in the list of former Heads of State. This is because the election of President Buhari on March 28 came with big joy that the ruling political tormentors were not power drunk and driven by their unethical credentials to annul the election, it should therefore open  the door for the execution of all the good tidings resident in the June 12, 1993 presidential election as it were.”

    Senator Shehu Sanni, who represents Kaduna Central at the upper legislative chamber, said he will use the Senate platform to ensure that a presidential library in Abuja and a monument in the National Assembly are named after the late Chief Abiola. He said the late Abiola remains the hero of freedom and democracy and that he helped to lay the foundation for the current democratic dispensation. He added: “Without the sacrifice made by Abiola there would be no democracy in this country today. All political office holders are beneficiaries of Abiola’s sacrifice. The success of March 28 presidential elections will be better attributed to the sacrifice made by Abiola. He lived at a time when human sacrifice was very rare. It was resistance against the annulment of June 12 that gave Nigerians the inspiration to resist dictatorship and call for positive change. Buhari was one of the few northerners who called for the revalidation of Abiola’s mandate in the heat of the struggle.”

    Erubami believes the best way to immortalise Chief MKO Abiola in the context of the new change mantra under President  Buhari is to ensure that the principles inherent in June 12 presidential election manifest in the changes to be driven by the APC. He said until the late Abiola is immortalised, the nation will continue to grope in the dark in search of democracy “because he is the rightful symbol of democracy who taught Nigerians that politics and democracy is worth living and dying for.”

    He noted that the best legacy of June 12 is the principle of oneness it introduced into Nigerian politics.  He said: “The acclaimed winner of the June 12 election defeated his opponent Bashir Tofa in all constituencies across the nation, including his home constituency in Tofa Village. It was the first election in the history of Nigeria that a pair of Muslim/ Muslim Candidate from a party, the Social Democratic Party (SDP) became acceptable without consideration by Nigerian electorate for race, religion and sex.

    “For the first time the election represented a transition for many years of power from the North to the South and from the military to a civilian administration in the most peaceful and fair manner. Against the permutations of the military oligarchy that permitted the transition, they never believed that the election can be globally and locally adjudged as the fairest, freest and most legitimate, having been won through the popular votes of the people.”

    The activist said the attempt to rename the University of Lagos after Abiola without legal backup by former President Jonathan was a mere smokescreen. He wants the new administration of President Buhari to renew efforts to assert the renaming the university, as well as the National Stadium in Abuja after him. In addition, “the suggested Centre for Democratic Studies whenever it is established and wherever it is located should also be named after him to demonstrate we have learnt from the lessons inherent in June 12,” he added.

    In addition, the VOTAS President said Democracy Day must be changed from May 29 to June 12 and that the day must be declared as public holiday, to honour Abiola, just as Americans remember and appreciate Martins Luther King.

    He lamented that Abiola lost his mandate, his life, his businesses and his loving wife, noting that no family in Nigeria ever lost so much for the entrenchment of democracy. He added that the posthumous award should be accompanied with cash donation and government commitment to join hands with the Abiola family to resuscitate his business empire. Erubami also wants other patriots like the late Pa Adekunle Ajasin, the late Pa Alfred Rewane, the late Pa Anthony Enahoro, the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi, the late Dr. Beko Ransome Kuti, the late Prof. Olikoye Ransome Kuti, the late Comrade Ola Oni, the late Comrade Chima Ubani, the late Baba Omojola to also be immortalised on the day of the posthumous award, as people who have worked and died for democracy , good living and livelihood for humanity.

    But, given that President Muhammadu has so many challenges on his hands at the moment, Barrister Niyi Akintola noted that it might be too early to expect him to tackle the issue of immortalization of Abiola right now. He said: “His focus would be how to build a united nation, how to ensure that there is peace and security in the land, how to curb corruption and how to combat the lingering economic crisis in Nigeria at the moment; the country is in serious trouble now over the issue of economy. As we speak, the pounds sterling is N240 and that would have multiplier effect on our economy because we are not producing anything; whatever you import you are going to pay more in naira.”

    Nevertheless, he said many areas can be exploited to immortalize Abiola, because he touched many lives in different fields of human endeavour. His words: “There is the area of sports, where he was widely acknowledged as the pillar of sports in Africa. If the National Stadium in Lagos or the one in Abuja is named after him that would not be too much.

    “Former President Goodluck Jonathan got it wrong he tried to play to the gallery by attempting to rename the University of Lagos after him. He never appreciated the fact that the Yoruba are a different kettle of fish altogether. I read a statement credited to the former President, saying he doesn’t understand the Yoruba. Apparently, he doesn’t understand the psyche of the average Yoruba man; the average Yoruba man believes that you must have justice before you can be talking of peace.

    “Jonathan actually wanted to reap where he did not sow. Irrespective of the fact that the late MKO Abiola was our son, we don’t believe that a national institution like the University of Lagos should be named after him. In fact, the University of Lagos was the very institution he (Abiola) himself attended; he was not the founder. Jonathan would have been applauded if he had named the National Stadium in Abuja after Abiola. There are many national institutions Abiola contributed so much in building that would have attracted the attention of any visionary leader in immortalizing the late Abiola.

    For instance, Akintola said one of the democratic institutions like the National Assembly complex or the Court of Appeal complex could be named after him. He said Abiola was instrumental to bringing about the democracy that Nigerians are enjoying today. He said: “It was the struggle for the restoration of June 12 that gave birth to the defunct National Democratic Coalition (NADECO); it was the struggle by NADECO that brought about the present democracy. So, one of the democratic institutions like the National Assembly complex could be named after him. The Court of Appeal complex could also be named after him; this is a man that went to court to challenge the annulment of his election. We had conflicting court judgments during this era. It was through the late Abiola’s efforts that the Interim Nation Government (ING) was declared illegal.”

  • June 12 and wind of change

    SIR: Let us learn to understand our differences rather than pretend to forget them – Sir Ahmadu Bello

    Exactly 22 years after the annulment of the June 12, 1993 general elections, many Nigerians outside the political struggle must sometimes wonder how Nigerians manage to preserve the existential spirit of perpetual optimism in the midst of inexcusable and sordid disregard for the peoples mandate and those that fought assiduously for democracy.

    In remembering the dark past of our democratic effort, we must salute the uncommon courage and toughness of Pa Abraham Adesanya, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, Professor Wole Soyinka, Dr. Akin Akingba, Chief Odigie Oyegun, George Noah, Dayo Johnson, Dele Momodu, Ndubusi Kanu and Dr. Kayode Fayemi and the like to numerous to mention and on the other hand those who agonizingly died in the struggle.

    As Nigerians, we share a great sense of responsibility to remember and acknowledge the pain and suffering of those who fought for our democratic freedom particularly the late Chief MKO Abiola and his beloved wife Kudirat respectively – a deep pain that has been handed down to us as people and too recent to be forgotten. We need to right those wrongs, heal together as a nation, and re-establish a conciliatory state that honours victims of our national struggle; they deserve to be in the national hall of fame.

    Finally, it is hoped that the real change for a new Nigeria lies in the pursuit of honouring the truth, untainted national reconciliation mechanism and the eventual enthronement of institutional integrity that would strap up the values of June 12 movement for a greater today and indeed a better tomorrow that we all can be proud of.

    Nigeria is on the march again and we are waiting for President Muhammadu Buhari.

     

    • Samuel Akpobome Orovwuje,
  • June 12: The grand conspiracy

    June 12: The grand conspiracy

    The memory of the June 12 presidential election lingers on. Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN examines the issues that led to its annulment and the role played by the principal actors in the saga. 

    Today, June 12, 2015, marks the 22nd anniversary of the 1993 presidential poll that is widely regarded as the freest and fairest election in Nigeria’s political history. Millions of Nigerians who trooped out to cast their ballots on that day demonstrated to the world that they are united. The fact that the flagbearers of the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP), Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola and Babagana Kingibe, were both Muslims did not matter to them. Their ethnic background was also not a factor during the election. The primary focus of the electorates was the programmes of their party and the personality of the candidates.

    On the election day, Abiola waited patiently under the sun to vote. Unknown to him, the powerful forces within and outside the military who were not comfortable with the idea of him becoming President would annul the election. The exercise was peaceful nationwide without any hitches or disturbances. While the vote count was on, with Abiola comfortably leading, the self-styled military President, General Ibrahim Babangida, struck. He ordered the electoral body — National Electoral Commission (NEC) — to stop further announcement of the results and on June 23, 1993, he annulled the election.

    This announcement was followed by spontaneous protests, mostly in the Southwest. To justify the annulment, Babangida in a nationwide broadcast claimed “there were allegations of irregularities and other acts of bad conduct leveled against the presidential candidates. But, the Prof. Humphrey Nwosu-led NEC went ahead to clear them.

     

    Secret behind annulment

    The Director-General of Centre for Democratic Studies (CDS), the late Professor Omo Omoruyi, gave an insight into why the election was annulled. He was the intermediary between Babangida and Abiola. He knew all that transpired between them before June 12, 1993 and thereafter. He reflected in his account: “I recall my meeting with our common friend, Gen. Babangida on June 21, 1993 on the June 12 issue; I remember very vividly how the General exploded ‘Professor, I cannot go on with the presidential election’. I asked why, because both of us knew before that day that our common friend, Chief Abiola had won the June 12, 1993 presidential election. I thought we should be happy. This was the first time I knew that we were in trouble.

    “The General went on: If I allow Bashorun (MKO) to become the President ‘they’ will kill him and ‘they’ will kill me (IBB) and ‘they’ may not spare you (Omoruyi) because ‘they’ know you are with me now and working with me on this matter.”

    According to Prof. Omoruyi, Gen. Babangida finally summoned courage and had a meeting with Chief Abiola on July 4, 1993 in the Presidential Villa. This was after the annulment. He said: “What was IBB planning to achieve then? Maybe he was planning to implement what the northern leaders told him to do, ‘offer Abiola money in lieu of the mandate’. The northern leaders actually advised IBB: ‘pay him off or as Nigerians would say, ‘settle him’. Chief Abiola told me in London on my hospital bed that he turned this down. In his words, ‘Omo, I told him, the suggestion was an insult not only to my person, but to the Nigerian people”.

    Analysts say Abiola election would have led to a shift of power from the North to the South, but some persons were not comfortable with it. Most importantly it would have also led to a shift of power from the military to civilians through the ballot box.

     

    Babangida endorsed Abiola’s candidature

    Omoruyi gave two reasons why he believed Babangida endorsed Abiola for the June 12 presidential election. He said: “First, IBB saw it as a way of resolving the credibility crisis he faced in 1992 after the botched presidential primaries. Second, IBB saw it as a way of resolving the succession crisis. As a serious candidate along with other candidates, I had dealings with him and other candidates in 1993. I provided him and other serious candidates with the necessary information before and after they became the official candidates of the SDP and NRC in my official capacity as the Director General, CDS.

    “Specifically on Chief Abiola, I also had occasions to discuss him with the President at various times as to his chances as our common friend. The President showed interest in his ambition and this encouraged my dealings with him.

    “It was as a result of our past relationship (Abiola and I) which spilled over to our relationship with a common friend (IBB) that I got to know how passionately he (Abiola) felt about the politics of Nigeria and why he decided to seek the exalted elective office in the land. Chief Abiola from time-to-time sought my advice on whether our common friend (IBB) was actually serious with the transition programme and specifically whether there was any ‘vacancy’ in the Presidential Villa. What Chief Abiola wanted to know from me was whether General Babangida was serious or not with his decision not to transform himself into a civilian President. Of course, I told Chief Abiola, just as I told many peoples in Nigeria and in the international community, that IBB was not interested in what Washington called the West African model of democratic transition such as in Ghana, Togo etc. What I got to know was that Chief Abiola loved General Babangida very much and he would have supported him if he had wanted to transform himself into a civilian President. I knew as a fact that Chief Abiola definitely did not want to offend him. In fact, he regretted ever offending him one day when he went to the Presidential Villa with the ‘enemy’ of the junta, Barrister Aka Bashorun, who had earlier accompanied him to a Presidential Dinner Party in honour of the President of South Africa, Mr. F. W. de Klerk. Chief Abiola, like other candidates and even military officers, routinely called me on telephone to find out how IBB’s mind was working on any issue. It was therefore in order that he called me to find out if our common friend had changed his mind on the transition programme. Chief Abiola had a way of asking me the same question over and over again whenever we met in and out of the Presidential Villa. I was very definite after November 1992 when the search for credible candidates was on to solve General Babangida’s credibility crisis. I advised Abiola to think about the race and I was not therefore surprised when he decided to take the plunge in January 1993.”

     

    Those who betrayed Abiola

    Omoruyi continues: “Abiola regretted that he was misled and betrayed first by our common friend, General Babangida who assured him that he was serious with the transition programme and allowed him to plough his resources into the election. He complained about Generals Abacha and Diya who invited him to come home on the firm promise that his mandate would be enforced by the military. He complained about how our common friend made him plough back money into politics and the Presidential race with a view to according his transition program some credibility in March, 1993. This was a fact. It is also a fact that Chief Abiola was used later in May, 1993 as IBB’s instrument of resolving his succession crisis.

    “MKO was very disappointed with the leadership of the Northern Elders Forum, most of them who he helped on many occasions to have medical attention abroad. He was bitter with the way he, the Deputy President of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs and a major financier of Islamic causes in the country was treated after the June 12 election by the then President of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, the former Sultan of Sokoto.

    “He regretted his blunder in not showing interest in those who became the leaders of his political party, the Social Democratic Party after he won the nomination of the party in March 1993.  He lamented the dubious role of a major Yoruba traditional ruler. He wondered aloud, how impotent the military officers from the south, especially from the Yorubaland were in the military government.”

     

    Forces behind annulment

    The principal characters in the events that led to the annulment of June 12 are:

    Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, Alhaji Bashir Tofa, Alhaji Babagana Kingibe, Chief Tony Anenih, Chief Tom Ikimi,  Chief Ernest Shonekan. Sen. Arthur Nzeribe, Justice Bassey Ikpeme, Justice Dahiru Saleh, Abimbola Davies,  the late Gen Sani Abacha and Clement Akpamgbo.

     

    Babangida

    Gen. Babangida has been a recurring feature of any discourse on June 12, 1993, presidential poll. This is primarily informed by his position as the head of the military government then, on whose desk the buck stopped. His claim that he annulled the election in the interest of the state was not acceptable to Nigerians and the international community. Against the backdrop that the Babangida regime had one of the longest political transition programmes in history made observers to conclude that the head of the military junta was not prepared to relinquish power. It was a grand design to perpetuate himself in power.

    An attempt to embark on another transition programme was repudiated by the political class. When the seat became too hot for him, he had to ‘step aside’ in August 1993 and installed a lame duck interim government led by Chief Earnest Shonekan. He once described himself as ‘an evil genius’. The annulment of June 12 is a burden that he will carry for the rest of his life.

     

    Tofa

    Alhaji Bashir Tofa was the presidential candidate of the National Republican Convention (NRC). He was a dark horse until he emerged in 1993. The Kano-based businessman was, however, very wealthy and had connections with the then ruling military class. His money, connections and political clout were, however, no match to that of Abiola, who easily defeated him in his home in Kano. Ordinarily, Tofa ought to have behaved like a good loser, by conceding defeat, but he failed. He played into the hands of the military officers who did not want the election results to be upheld.

    He keeps defending the annulment. He described the critics of June 12 as people that have nothing to offer in moving the country forward. He insisted that the June 12 election was marred by irregularities and that the military did the right thing in cancelling the results.

     

    Kingibe

    Ambassador Babagana Kingibe was the pioneer chairman of the SDP. He was Abiola’s running mate in the 1993 election. He got the slot through the influence of the SDP governors. With immense influence upon the SDP governors, he easily became a major factor in the run up to the SDP primaries which Abiola eventually won. The governors were nevertheless determined to foist him on Abiola as his running mate, a decision Abiola took at the expense of Atiku Abubakar who was a loyalist of the powerful Shehu Musa Yar‘Adua.

    Following the annulment, Kingibe initially stood with Abiola, but he wavered in the struggle for its revalidation. The confidence in him among the pro-June 12 agitators ebbed when he accepted to serve in the Abacha administration. A Kanuri man like Abacha, Kingibe abandoned the June 12 struggle and turned his back against Abiola who languished in Abacha’s gulag for five years before he died.

     

    Abacha

    The late General Sani Abacha was the arrow head of the military officers that were opposed to June 12. The National Defence and Security Council, the highest military ruling body under Babangida’s regime was polarized by the June 12 crisis. The Council set up a committee headed by Abacha to look into the election and advise it accordingly. Members of the Committee included Brigadier David Mark (former Senate President) Murtala Nyako (former Governor of Adamawa State) General Aliyu Muhammed Gusau (former Minister Of Defence) and Col. Halilu Akilu.

    Abacha threatened NEC Chairman, Professor Nwosu for disobeying court order that stopped June 12 election during the National Defence and Security Council meeting. He was the most senior military officer left behind by Babangida when he ‘stepped aside’ and put in place an interim government headed by Chief Shonekan.

    Abacha sent the interim government packing and took over the reign of power. He dismantled all democratic institutions and suppressed agitations for the revalidation of June 12. Many June 12 activists were thrown into detention, some died in the process, while others fled the country. He was referred to as ‘maximum ruler’ because of the brutish style of his administration. He died in office on June 8, 1998, in mysterious circumstance.

     

    Anenih

    Tony Anenih took over the chairmanship of the SDP after Kingibe. He was a retired police officer. He became chairman through the influence of late Gen. Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, the leader of the Peoples Democratic Movement, a major bloc within the SDP.

    Though Anenih led his party to victory, but soon after the results were annulled, he abandoned the cause of the party. While political leaders and rights activists were agitating for revalidation of June 12 mandate, Anenih looked the other way. Sources said he became a master strategist for the military regime that detained the flagbearer of his party.

     

    Ikimi

    Tom Ikimi was the national chairman of the NRC, the opposition party that was defeated by the SDP in the June 12 1993 election. Like his party’s presidential candidate, Tofa, he refused to concede victory and echoed the words of the military to justify the annulment of the results.  He allegedly played a major role in the committee that mid-wifed the birth of the Interim Government that succeeded Babangida.

     

    Shonekan

    Chief Ernest Shonekan was a respected figure in the business community who through his successful stewardship at the UAC, one of Nigeria’s leading blue chip companies at that time had carved a name for himself. He was appointed by Babangida to head the transition cabinet at the beginning of 1993 and with the annulment he stayed on as chairman of what was named as an Interim National Government (ING), which was supposed to arrange for another presidential election.

    His ING was eventually declared illegal by a Lgos High Court. This paved the way for Abacha to bare his fangs and assume full control of the country in November 1993. His acceptance to head the 32-man ING at the expense of his kinsman, Abiola, infuriated many.

     

    Nzeribe

    Arthur Nzeribe was notorious for his dubious role in the events that led to the annulment of June 12. He and some faceless Igbo politicians and businessmen carried out their nefarious activities on the platform of Association for Better Nigeria, (ABN). Nzeribe became a ready tool in the hands of the military to truncate the June 12 electoral victory. He and one Abimbola Davies and Dr Atkins mounted campaigns against June 12 poll. They created fears in the minds of the Nigerians. The unexpected happened when Nzeribe obtained a mid-night court injunction on June 10 stopping the election from holding. The court order was one of the reasons cited by Babangida to justify the annulment.

     

    Akpamgbo

    The late Clement Akpamgbo was the Attorney General and Minister of Justice during the Babangida’s regime. He held several meetings with ABN chiefs in his house. ABN’s lawyer, the late Philip Umeadi, frequented the house to hold consultations with the Attorney General. Instead of advising the military on legal matters pertaining to the election, Akpamgbo colluded with those bent on scuttling the election especially, the ABN.

     

    Ikpeme

    The late Justice Bassey Ikpeme granted a controversial ruling to stop the election from holding at odd hours. The court sat in the night on June 11. The ruling was believed to have contravened Decree No. 13 of 1993, which does not recognise the jurisdiction of the court on election date.

     

    Saleh

    An Abuja High Court, presided by Justice Dahiru Saleh ordered NEC to stop further announcements of election returns and subsequently declared the entire poll illegal on the ground that it was held in contravention of a subsisting court order. Defending his action later, Saleh said both the late Ikpeme, who first ordered NEC not to conduct the elections, and himself were only doing their job.

     

    Nwosu

    Prof Humphrey Nwosu was the Chairman of the electoral body. He ignored the court ruling stopping the election from holding. He relied on Decree 13 of 1993 which says: “Once a date has been set for the general election in Nigeria no court can stop that election”. The electorate had confidence in him that he would conduct a credible election. He was transparent in the declaration of the results until the military leaders stopped him from making further announcement of the results.

    Nwosu succumbed to intimidation by the military. But, analysts said Nwosu should have released the results and declare Abiola the winner since he had all results with him.

  • Osun declares Friday June 12 Public Holiday

    Osun declares Friday June 12 Public Holiday

    The Government of Osun has declared Friday June 12, 2015 as public holiday to mark the 22nd anniversary of the annulled June 12  ‎presidential election.

    A statement by the Director, Bureau of Communication and Strategy, Office of the Governor, Mr. Semiu Okanlawon, said government declared the holiday to mark the day the whole country united to vote a candidate of their choice without religious or ethnic considerations.

    The Governor, Ogbeni Aregbesola, said June 12 is significant and central to the development of democracy that the nation is now enjoying.

    The statement said “Governor Rauf Aregbesola has approved Friday June 12 as public holiday to enable our people observe the day that Nigerians closed all ranks.

    “Nigerians should reflect ‎on the significance of the June 12, the sacrifice made by Abiola so as for all of us to come together to cultivate, consolidate and protect the current democratic experiment.”

  • Abiola, June 12 and the road not taken

    Abiola, June 12 and the road not taken

    Renowned journalist and one of the founding editors of TELL magazine, Mr. DARE BABARINSA, tells the story of the June 12 annulment from his recollections of what took place at the time. The story could not have been better told; Mr. Babarinsa, as a former Executive Editor and Member, Board of Directors of TELL, was a participant-observer who witnessed some of the events surrounding the saga first hand.

    Twenty-two years down the road, it is necessary to evaluate and understand the centrality of Chief Moshood Abiola’s sacrifice in bringing us the Fourth Republic. Chief Abiola was the winner of the June 12 1993 presidential election whose victory was voided by the military dictatorship of General Ibrahim Babangida. It was Abiola’s and other heroes’ and heroines’ sacrifice that has given us the long democratic dispensation we have been enjoying since 1999.

    The Abacha coup of November 1993 was a turning point in the struggle of Abiola to claim the presidency of Nigeria. With his victory in that year’s presidential election, Abiola became Nigeria’s President-presumptive and Alhaji Babagana Kingibe, the Vice-President presumptive.  Then Abacha seized power and the struggle entered a new phase.

    The Abacha putsch was a coup-foretold.  It was indeed, a creeping coup in which Abiola may have actively participated.  A few days after the coup, Chief Ebenezer Babatope, the Director of Organisation of the defunct Obafemi Awolowo’s Unity Party of Nigeria, UPN, during the Second Republic and a pillar of the Awoist Vanguard, came to my office at the then corporate headquarters of TELL, on Acme Road, Ikeja.  He looked agitated.

    “Abiola has collapsed,” he blurted out.  He said that morning, a meeting had been held at Abiola’s residence in Ikeja, and it was resolved that the Abiola group would support the new Abacha junta.  He said the resolution of the meeting was communicated to the Awoist group which was then meeting regularly at the Ikeja home of Chief Alfred Rewane, the liberal businessman and former private secretary to Chief Awolowo.  He said in view of Abiola decision, the Awoist group would be nominating members into the new government.  He said because of this, Abacha had agreed that supporters of Abiola would be nominated as deputy-governors to military governors that would soon be announced by the junta. He said most likely, Kingibe, Alhaji Lateef Jakande, the popular former Lagos State Governor and several top politicians who were close to Abiola, may also join the Abacha cabinet.  He said he, Dr Olu Onagoruwa and Mrs Mobolaji Osomo, may also be joining the cabinet on the strength of a recommendation from the Awoist group.

    “I do not have full details of the deal,” Babatope said. “But if Abiola intends to reclaim his mandate, he has no business allowing his supporters to join a military regime.  His only deal should have been to support it until they hand over to him. If they join the government, how would they look forward to the revalidation of his mandate?”  Would he take up the appointment if it was announced?

    “I will,” he said.  “I am only obeying my leaders.  But if I were Abiola, I will not go the same route.  Our leader, Papa Awolowo would not have agreed to that also.”  Chief Awolowo died in 1987, but for Babatope, he forever remains a reference point.

    Babatope left me puzzled and troubled.  Few days earlier, we saw on national television, the fuzzy footage of Abiola’s visit to Abacha in Lagos.  We were told later that he was accompanied on that visit by many of his top supporters including Kingibe, Jakande and a young Senator from Lagos, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who was promised the post of deputy-governor. Few days later, Babatope, and most of the other nominees of the Awoist group and the Abiola group were appointed ministers. Abacha reneged on his promise to appoint civilian deputy governors and he was determined to do worse.

    In the early days of the regime, Babatope, Osomo, Alex Ibru (publisher of The Guardian who was also made the Minister of Internal Affairs) and Onagoruwa were briefing the meeting at Rewane’s house regularly.  In the end, most of them, claiming they were occupied with state’s assignments, were not showing up.  It was also clear that they were under serious security watch.  I went to see Papa Rewane with my friend, Funminiyi Afuye, (Baba Abraham Adesanya nicknamed him Afemo!) to complain about the turn of events.  We had not formed Idile Oodua then, but we had an informal group which included the likes of Engineer Adebayo Adenekan, Prince Ademola Oyinlola, my colleague in TELL, Kayode Anwo, an engineer, Biodun Bamkefa, also an engineer and now a pastor, Paschal Idowu, an insurance executive, Prince Adedokun Abolarin, lawyer (now Kabiyesi, the Orangun of Oke-Ila, Osun State) and Barrister Rotimi John. Papa Rewane said the Awoist group cannot refuse to collaborate with the Abacha junta if Abiola was in league with the regime.

    How to actualize Abiola’s victory had been a matter of contention among his supporters, especially those of us were ready to join the fray. In the wake of the June 12 annulment, there were many theories and suggestion on which road to take.  One of the biggest supporters of Abiola originally was General Olusegun Obasanjo, the retired military ruler who was then living on his farm in Otta, OgunState. He was a big pillar for TELL in our confrontation with General Ibrahim Babangida, the head of the ruling junta. Each time they seize copies of our publication, we always run to him for intervention. He had come out openly that Babangida must honour his pledge to hand over to an elected successor come August 27, 1993. After the election, my colleagues at TELL, NosaIgiebor, Editor-in-Chief and KolawoleIlori, Executive Editor, visited Obasanjo in his farm house. He was on the phone most of the time monitoring the result state by state.

    “This is a great day for Nigeria,” he told them. “Abiola is going to be President. The reputation of the military has been saved.”

    After the annulment was announced through a press statement distributed in Abuja by NdukaIrabor, the press secretary to military Vice-President Augustus Aikhomu, I went to Otta in the company of Dele Omotunde, the deputy Editor-in-Chief of TELL. Obasanjo was in a bellicose mood.

    “Annulment or no annulment, Babangida must leave by August 27,” he said.  “He made the promise, he has to keep it!”

    Then through a convoluted route that involved serious muscling and pressure from General Obasanjo, the military led by General Sani Abacha, the political class led by Abiola and his old friend and lately rival, Major-General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, the civil society, led by BekoRansome-Kuti and Gani Fawehinmi and the Press, Babangida “stepped aside” on August 27, 1993. He left power in the powerless hand of an Interim Government allegedly led by Chief Ernest Adegunle Shonekan, a corporate titan who was at sea in the turbulent terrain of Abuja high-wire politics.

    After Shonekan’s ascension, my colleagues in TELL, Igiebor, OnomeOsifo-Whiskey, the Managing Editor, Ilori, and Ayo Akinkuotu, the Senior Associate Editor, who were earlier captured “as prisoners of war” by the agents of the Babangida dictatorship, were released.  Few days later, Shonekan sent a message that he would like to see us and we asked Igiebor and Osifo-Whiskey to go.  They met Shonekan at the Akinola Aguda House, Abuja. The denizens of the Aso Rock Presidential Villa claimed they were refurbishing the Presidential Palace and would not allow Shonekan to move in.  My friends said they would like to drink coffee.  Shonekan called the steward and ordered for coffee. The coffee was never brought until the meeting ended 40 minutes later.  This showed how powerful Shonekan was!

    Yet some of our leaders were ready to invest him with possibilities. At a meeting with some members of our group, one of our leaders said the public opposition to Shonekan would not work in our interest.

    “We need to support Degunle (Shonekan) to stabilize the country and conduct another presidential election,” he said.  “The alternative would be military rule.”

    “If they refuse to install Abiola, we will go to war,” one of us said.  “We don’t want military rule again.”

    “You don’t know war,” the big man replied.  “This is war:  You send 10 of your best reporters to go and cover a story in Maiduguiri.  Five of them are killed, three are wounded and only two came back home.  Then you are requested to send another batch of 10 reporters to Maiduguri and all the ten are killed.  That is war!”

    We did not agree with him.  Few days later, I tried to no avail to see Chief Abiola.  I complained to General Alani Akinrinade, who advised that I should see Otunba Olabiyi Durojaiye, former presidential aspirant on the platform of the Social Democratic Party, SDP, who was destined for the gulag under General Abacha. Durojaiye linked me up with Kudirat, Abiola’s senior wife who advised me to come 8 a.m the following morning. Sure enough, I met Abiola the following day by 8 a.m. I told him the advice of the bigman that he should cooperate with Shonekan so that another presidential election can be held.  Abiola shook his head and said this was unacceptable.

    “I did not vote for myself,” he said.  “Nigerians voted for me. I have already won the presidential election. You cannot re-sit for an exam you have already passed.”

    Indeed at that point, Abiola’s options were limited. He had expended huge amount of his personal vast fortune on the 1993 presidential elections.  I do not know of any group of Nigerians that donated money to Abiola’s campaign. He funded it virtually singlehandedly. To ask him to ‘re-sit for the exam,’ would have been very difficult considering the resources still available to his opponents, especially the enigmatic Major-General Yar’Adua and the shadowy elements in the military bent on stopping him at all cost.

    I gave him a one page recommendation from our own group.  He should continue to encourage “solidarity visits” from prominent individuals and groups. Elected governors too should be persuaded to place solidarity and congratulatory adverts for the President-elect in the newspapers, especially in Abiola’s National Concord. Abiola concurred to these suggestions. Two days later, adverts started coming out from the SDP governors congratulating the President-elect. We were very happy.  The American ambassador, like many other diplomats, visited Abiola. So was Lt. General Yakubu Danjuma, retired Chief of Army Staff. Danjuma visited and read an encouraging poem to him and other visitors.

    It was around this period that the Lagos State high court ruled that the ING was illegal. With this judgment, Nigeria was in a legal limbo. We expected that Abiola would be sworn-in as President in a revolutionary step.  There were protest across the country in his support, but the President-elect was looking at another direction instead of a direct revolutionary face-off with the government.  It was at this period that Professor BolajiAkinyemi, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, wrote an article in the newspapers asking the military to intervene and save Nigeria from political uncertainties.

    After the judicial pronouncement, events were moving at a frenetic pace.  We were disappointed that Abiola did not make efforts to get sworn-in as President.  For us, this would have been the ultimate sign of defiance against the illegal ING. The atmosphere was charged with rumour of an impending coup which may be the result of a showdown between the military faction led by Major-General Dongoyaro and the other by Abacha.  Soon, Dongoyaro and many other top military officers were fired.  Then, the Abacha coup. Shonekan resigned with a gun literarily pointed at his head. He was shown on television claiming he was handing over power to “the most senior minister.” The sacked ING chairman was allowed to pick his suitcase from Aguda House and he quickly returned home.  Lucky man.

    Many weeks after Abacha had settled into the bosom of power, I was admitted into the small private sitting room of Abiola.  As I was approaching the landing of the staircase, several framed pictures of Abiola and some of his “friends,” starred from the wall.  Dominating that wall was the picture of Abiola and Babangida.  It gave one an eerie feeling. I think (but not too sure now) that there was also another picture of him and Abacha on the same wall.

    Abiola was in a cagey mood like a tiger at bay. I told him we were confused about the turn of events. What is going to happen now about his June 12 mandate? He admitted errors had been made.  He pointed out two “significant errors.” One was his choice of Kingibe as his vice-presidential candidate.  One of the earliest papers we presented to him was on the choice of a running mate.  We had recommended a candidate from the Middle-Belt, preferably, Dan Suleiman, a retired air commodore and former military governor. But the SDP governors preferred Kingibe and Abiola went with them. He said he did not know then that Kingibe had “extensive connections and relationship” with the security agencies and the military high command.

    The second error, he said, had to do with the emergence of Chief Anthony Anenih as the chairman of the SDP.  He said if he had shown sufficient interest, instead of trying to placate his old friend Yar’Adua, he would have been able to ensure the victory of Chief SergeantAwuse. With Anenih in charge, Yar’Adua came to virtually control the machinery of the SDP and it took a lot of efforts for Abiola to defeat Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Yar’Adua’s protégé, during the presidential primary of the SDP.  When the annulment came, Abiola said Anenih did not consult him before “he negotiated away our victory.”  It was obvious then that Abiola had given up on his old friend, Yar’Adua, and the chairman of his party, Anenih.

    It was to be our last meeting.  Soon, the struggle would take on new dimensions corralling into its ever expanding vortex the likes of Chief Anthony Enahoro, Chief Adekunle Ajasin, Senator Abraham Adesanya, Chief Bola Ige, Soyinka, NdubisiKanu, General Akinrinade, Dr Amos Akingba (a man of unfathomable courage and daring), Durojaiye, Rewane, Tola Mobolurin, Dr Frederick Fasheun, Femi Falana, Olisa Agbakoba, Kola Omojola, Chris Anyanwu, Gbenga Adebusuyi, Baba Omojola, Wahaab Dosumu, Ayo Opadokun, Chief OluFalae, Arthur Nwankwo, Senator Ayo Fasanmi, Reuben Fasoranti, Dr Falaye Aina, Ayo Opadokun, Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Otunba Solanke Onasanya, Chief Frank Kokori, Comrade Adams Oshiohmole, Mrs Kofoworola Buknor-Akerele and many, many more, especially the redoubtable old men (and young men and women) of Afenifere. Many people do not remember now that the opposition National Democratic Coalition, NADECO, was formed at a meeting in the Ikeja home of General Adeyinka Adebayo, former military governor of the defunct Western State.

    Few weeks later, I met with Chief Babatope at a guest house in Ilupeju, owned by one of the parastatals of the Federal Ministry of Transport. He had now settled in as an Abacha minister.  I asked him pointedly whether and When Abacha was going to hand over power to Abiola.  Babatope said the situation has changed dramatically. “The National Assembly is gone, the state assemblies are gone, the governors are gone,” he said.  I reminded him that General Diya, the Chief of General Staff and deputy to Abacha had said “our stay will be brief.” Babatope said the situation has become more complicated.  “Only one man knows the answer,” he said unhappily.  “I don’t know.  Even Dipo (General Diya) doesn’t know!”

    Twenty three years later, our country deserves to know the truth about the June 12 annulment.  General Babangida has repeatedly accepted responsibility for that singular act that derailed his expensive but ultimately futile transition programme, but our country and posterity deserves to know the facts that led to that decision. President Mohammadu Buhari owes us the duty to let Nigerians know the truth about this singular event that has led us to where we are and ultimately gave us the current democratic dispensation.  Knowing the truth does not mean apportioning blames or dishing out punishment.  The truth is necessary for our liberation and progress as a country.