Tag: June 12

  • The June 12 general

    IT WAS June 21, 1993, nine days after the June 12 presidential election, with results so far released,  showing that the late Bashorun M. K. O. Abiola of the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP) had won. What was left was for the National Electoral Commission (NEC) headed by Prof Humphrey Nwosu to declare him the winner. But before Nwosu could do that, he got a contrived court order to suspend further announcement of the results. That day, the Court of Appeal sitting in Kaduna was to decide whether the remaining results should be released or not.

    Then began a long wait for the conclusion of the election in which the late Abiola’s opponent Alhaji Bashir Tofa of the defunct National Republican Convention (NRC) stood no chance at all. Abiola was larger than life and he remains much more so even in death. He did not win the June 12 election because he was a politician; he won it because first and foremost, he was a humanist who put others first. He was an example of the biblical admonition of “love thy neighbour as thyself”. He reaped the reward of the good he did for many Nigerians across the country whether Muslim, Christian, Traditionalist or Atheist, voted for him in that election.

    Why would Nwosu stop announcing the results because of a court injunction when he did not comply with the late Justice Bassey Ikpeme’s order not to hold the election, many wondered. Nwosu conducted the election because he had the backing of the Babangida junta, but such support was lacking when it was time to declare the winner.

    The Justices of the Court of Appeal (JCAs) had barely begun sitting that day in Kaduna when one of their aides breezed in through the door behind them and whispered into the ears of the presiding justice. In a jiffy, the justices stood down the June 12 case and returned to their chambers. Those of us in the courtroom looked at one another, wondering what was amiss, while one-time presidential aspirant Sarah Jibrin, who was also around, engaged in theatrics of her own. Then news started flying  that the election had been annulled. What, some people shouted. Someone came with a transistor radio and we all crowded round him, eager to get the latest on the annulment. Finally, it came. It was a terse, unsigned statement, which was read to reporters at the Villa.

    We were still debating the propriety of the annulment when the court resumed sitting. We all trooped back inside. The case was called and after the lawyers introduced themselves, it was obvious that the matter would not go on. Can the appeal court hear an application to discharge the order stopping the announcement of the election results in view of the latest development? Being an era when the military trampled upon everything, including the right of courts to adjudicate on cases, the justices decided to err on the side of caution. The matter was adjourned for the dust over it to settle.

    The justice  Abiola was denied in court 25 years ago has now been given him politically, by the “least president”, according to foremost June 12 crusader Frank Kokori, ‘’that was expected to do so”. Through a stroke of the pen, President Muhammadu Buhari redrew the June 12 map to accord the business mogul his pride of place. Abiola is not alive today, but he will turn in his grave for the honour done  him. The President is today not the biggest fan of some people because of what he has done. But that is to be expected. Doing the right thing is never popular; some people will always find fault with it, whether legal, spiritual, moral or otherwise. But what is right is right, no matter from which angle people look at it.

    The President has done well by honouring Abiola with the highest national award of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR)  and designating June 12, the date of the election he won resoundingly, Democracy Day. There can be no greater justice than this. The President did not stop at that. He also honoured Abiola’s running mate Alhaji Babagana Kingibe and foremost rights activist the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN) with Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON).

    It is good that Abiola has been honoured, but as a nation we should also not forget thousands of his supporters, who died in the struggle to actualise June 12. We do not know these thousands, but we know the cause they died for. The nation may not give them national honours, but it can erect a monument in their memory just like the cenotaph of the Unknown Soldier. If the nation can do that, it would go a long way to assuage the loss of many families.  Let us put up a cenotaph in Abuja with the epithet : June 12 : In memory of the Unknown Nigerian. Even Abiola will be happy in his grave if we do this.

     

    The world at their feet

    THE World Cup starts today, with the host nation, Russia taking on Saudi Arabia; and Egypt playing Uruguay, in the opening games. Nigeria is playing in Group D, where it is drawn against Iceland, Croatia and Argentina. What are our chances of qualifying for the Group of 16? This is the question many Nigerians have been asking since the draws were released. We play our first match on Saturday against Croatia in MSK Kaliningrad Stadium.

    If we beat the Croatians, we would have served others notice that we are in Russia for business. We have never gone past the Second Round since we started going to the mundial. We can better that record in Russia by beating Croatia and Iceland and drawing with Argentina to get to the Second Round. In the Second Round, we will take our chance against whoever emerges as our opponents.

    We can get to the quarter final. It all rests on the Mikel Obi – led team to be business-minded and shun distractions. With their footballing feet, they are set to rule the world. All the best, Super Eagles.

  • June 12: Buhari did the unthinkable – Gani Adams

    President Muhammadu Buhari did the unthinkable by honouring the martyr of democracy, the late MKO Abiola, with the most prestigious national honour (GCFR), the Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yoruba Land, Gani Adams, has said.

    Adams made the assertion at the 25th anniversary of June 12. 1993, Presidential Election organised by the Oodua People’s Congress (OPC) in Lagos State.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that OPC organised the event in collaboration with the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Lagos State Council.

    The anniversary had the theme: “Nigerian Politics and Democratic Process: MKO Abiola and the June 12, 1993, Crisis and Beyond”.

    Adams, also OPC National Coordinator, said: “Where we least expected the truth about June 12 to come from, there is where it came.
    “ I salute you all for persevering in the last 25 years.
    “Whether the Federal Government’s decision is more political than legal, as argued by some people, for me, it is crystal clear that the journey to make June 12 our Democracy Day started years back.

    “I feel relieved to witness this day being recognised as our Democracy Day. Today, we have defeated the evil voices that killed the dream of the late MKO Abiola.

    “I will like to express my appreciation to President Buhari for taking the bold initiative of honouring the late Abiola and the late Gani Fewehinmi,’’ he said.

    Adams said that posterity would be kind to Buhari for putting Nigeria’s democratic history in the right perspective.

    According to him, Abiola, as the 14th Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yoruba Land, was committed to the cause of the masses and good governance.
    He expressed delight that the reward for Abiola‘s struggle had come.

    Adams, the 15th Aare Ona Kakanfo, said: “The way we clamoured and struggled to have this day as our Democracy Day, we also need to make the needed sacrifices, struggles and make a case for restructuring. We need to stand firm and raise our voices in support of restructuring.”

    In his remarks, Sen. Shehu Sani, the Chairman of the occasion, said that Buhari wrote his name in gold by honouring Abiola, but advised that the honour should not be politicised.

    “With the annulment of June 12, we (Nigerians) missed an opportunity for unity, progress and prosperity as a nation,” Sani said.

    He said that the greatest honour to Abiola would be upholding democracy ideals, good governance and justice, and ensuring end to poverty, killings and political vendetta.
    Dr Qasim Akinreti, Chairman of NUJ, Lagos Council, said: “Today we salute President Buhari for his courage to allow justice on June 12 to prevail. Hope has finally come for Nigerians. We welcome this.’’

    Akinret noted that many journalists suffered in the June 12 struggle, saying NUJ desired announcement of June 12, 1993 Presidential Election result.

    The guest speaker, Associate Prof. Derin Ologbenla of the Department of Political Science, University of Lagos, said that `monetisation’ of political process negatively affected Nigeria’s democracy.
    Ologbenla added that political manipulations through `godfatherism’ adversely affected the democracy.

    “We are subject to godfathers and money in our body politics. We have divisive instruments of ethnicity and religion.

    “Ethnicity is an ugly monster that must be killed if Nigeria’s democracy most grow and develop. We have not come together to bury this monster,’’ the don said.

    Dr Joe Okei-Odumakin, Coordinator, Women Arise Initiative, said that the best honour to Abiola would be organisation of free and fair elections as well as end to poverty and injustice.

    Dr Orji Uzor Kalu, a former Governor of Abia, said that he sent a bill to the state House of Assembly in 2000 to declare June 12 a public holiday because of his belief in it.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Buhari on June 6 announced that June 12 would replace May 29 as Nigeria’s Democracy Day.

    The president also announced posthumous award of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) to Abiola, the presumed winner of the June 12, 1993, Presidential Election.
    He also announced award of Grand Commander of the Order of Niger to Abiola’s running mate Babagana Kingibe, and the late social critic and human rights campaigner, Chief Gani Fawehinmi.

    The beneficiaries received the awards on Tuesday in Abuja.

  • June 12: APC governors visit Buhari

    Governors under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) on Tuesday night met with President Muhammadu Buhari where they congratulated him on his decision to recognize June 12 as Democracy Day.

    Imo State Governor, Rochas Okorocha, who disclosed this to State House correspondents after the closed doors meeting with President Buhari at the First Lady Conference Hall, Aso Rock, Abuja, said the governors also commended the President for the conferment of honours on heroes of democracy.

    President Buhari had on June 6 declared that June 12 be observed as Democracy Day in Nigeria henceforth and conferred national honours on heroes of democracy.

    The President on Tuesday conferred a posthumous Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) honour on the presumed winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election, late Chief MKO Abiola.

    He also conferred the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON) honour on Abiola’s running mate, Alhaji Babagana Kingibe.

    The late foremost human rights activist, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, was conferred with a posthumous GCON honour.

    Okorocha said the APC governors lauded the action and foresight of President Buhari for taking steps aimed at uniting Nigerians and promoting political stability in the country.

    NAN

  • Buhari on June 12: sorry

    President honours Abiola, Kingibe, Fawehinmi

    Soyinka advocates ‘hall of shame’

    Tinubu: we’ll back Buhari for second term

    Falana: ensure rights and end killings

    Before a select audience of dignitaries and pro-June 12, 1993 activists, President Muhammadu Buhari yesterday apologised for the annulment of the election, which the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola won.

    “On behalf of the Federal Government, I tender the nation’s apology to the family of MKO Abiola, who got the highest votes and to those that lost their loved ones in the course of the June 12 struggle, “the President said at the investiture in Abuja of  Abiola, his running mate Amb. Babagana  Kingibe and the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi with national honours.

    The apology was applauded.

    Buhari said the country would “no longer tolerate such perversion of justice.”  “The decision … is not an attempt to open old wounds but to put right a national wrong. Nigerians, of their own free will, voted for the late Chief MKO Abiola and Amb. Baba Gana Kingibe, the presidential flag bearer and running mate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the 1993 elections,” Buhari said, adding:

    “The government of the day inexplicably cancelled the election when it was clear who were going to be the winners.

    “We cannot rewind the past but we can at least assuage our feelings; recognise that a wrong has been committed and resolve to stand firm now and in the future for the sanctity of free elections.”

    Abiola declared himself the president–elect and was arrested by the Gen. Sani Abacha junta. He was held in detention for four years till he died in 1998. He was 60.

    The President conferred the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) posthumously on Abiola, the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON) on Chief Fawehinmi, the activist-lawyer who was one of the vocal voices against the annulment of the election, and decorated Kingibe with GCON.

    Abiola’s award was received by his eldest son, Kola. Fawehinmi was represented by his wife Ganiat.

    The government invited eminent Nigerians who participated in the struggle for the actualisation of the election, many of them hounded into exile or jailed by the military government.

    Buhari added: “This retrospective and posthumous recognition is only a symbolic token of redress and recompense for the grievous injury done to the peace and unity of our country.

    “Our decision to recognise and honour June 12 and its actors is in the national interest. It is aimed at setting national healing process and reconciliation of the 25-year festering wound caused by the annulment of the June 12th elections. I earnestly invite all Nigerians across all our national divide to accept it in good faith.

    “Our action today is to bury the negative side of June 12, the side of ill-feelings, hate, frustrations and agony. What we are doing is celebrating and appreciating the positive side of June 12. The June 12, which restates democracy and freedom.

    “The June 12 that overcome our various divide and the June 12 that produced unity and national cohesion. This is the June 12 we are celebrating today and we will nurture it to our next generation.”

    “I honestly invite all Nigerians across all our national divides to accept it in good faith. Our action today is to bury the negative sides of June 12, the side of ill-feelings, hate, frustration and agony.

    “What we are doing is celebrating and appreciating the positive sides of June 12.

    “The June 12 which reinstates democracy and freedom, the June 12 that overcomes our various divides and the June 12 that produces unity and national cohesion.

    “This is the June 12 we are celebrating today and we will nurture it to our next generation,” he said

    He then asked for a minute silence in honour of Abiola and those who lost their lives in the struggle for the actualisation of June 12.

    Master of Ceremonies Peter Dama announced that former President Olusegun Obasanjo and former military leader Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, who annulled the election, sent regrets for their inability to attend the ceremony.

    Obasanjo said he was away in Norway for a book presentation. Babangida gave health reasons for his absence. The electoral umpire, Prof. Humphrey Nwosu, said he was overseas.

    Tinubu: we’ll back Buhari

    All Progressives Congress (APC) stalwart Asiwaju Bola Tinubu praised Buhari’s courage.

    He said: “Nigeria, it’s fair that we have chosen democracy as the form of government. We are totally committed to democracy. It has been further strengthened today.

    “The love of our nation, to search previous regimes and correct the errors of the past … shows you are a great leader. We thank you.”

    He thanked former Senate President Iyorchia Ayu, Senator Abu Ibrahim and others for the roles they played in 1993 and thereafter.

    To President Buhari, Tinubu said: “We formed a partnership of very strong democratic principles and you are living up to it. You made a promise that you will be committed to transparency and rule of law… you have done it”.

    The former Lagos State governor spoke of an ex-president, who “because of the mention of June 12 threatened to throw me out of the helicopter”. But you’ve remained resolute to put Nigeria back on self-discovery, great determination and fidelity with democratic principles. Thank you Mr. President. Thank you for bringing back hope to Nigeria.

    “Farewell to poverty. It is the struggle of Africa to banish poverty and you are investing in education, which is a great weapon against poverty. You are feeding our children; we are no longer paying for darkness …, thank you Mr. President.

    On Buhari’s second term bid, Tinubu said: “It is not a question of second term, you deserve it. We are going to work for it.  No annulment on it, you are going to win it.”

    Create ‘hall of shame’

    Nobel winner Prof. Wole Soyinka said the Presidential apology at the event was a dimension which he did not expect.

    He said: “And l had a lot to say, but fortunately the words have been taken off my mouth. However, l will like to make a request. Mr. president since we are honoring heroes of democracy today, I’ll like to request that you manage to stop creating confusion in the minds of Nigerians.

    “It is not possible to honour MKO Abiola in one breath and admire his tormentor in another breath. Loyalty is all very well but loyalty can become perverse if that loyalty is retained to an individual who if he were alive today would be before the International Court for crimes against humanity.

    “The one who broke the laws of Nigeria, international laws, pauperised this nation. It is confusing if professional loyalty is carried so far as to be accorded such an individual.

    “We had a private conversation some time ago and l remember one of the things which l mentioned to you was this …l said you are fighting corruption.. how come that a notorious dictator, corrupt ruler, is honored by one of the most important avenues in the capital of Abuja, whereas, individuals like the martyrs of the struggle, philanthropists have not been honored? The answer you gave to me was not too satisfactory. But I let it pass.”

    Mr. Kola Abiola said: “Mr. President, on behalf of the MKO Abiola family, we  accept both the award and the apology. We will like to thank you for the great honour you have done our family.

    “We thank you for taking the decisive measures to strengthen our democracy and guarantee our future by reconciling our past. Thank you very much sir. Generations to come will honour you for this.

    “May the souls of our dearly departed rest in peace. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

    Abiola our hero

    His sister Hafsat Abiola-Costello, who responded on behalf of the family, said: “It is difficult to try to stand in the shoes of a giant of one of the greatest humans that the world ever had but that is … why we are here today. And indeed, even for MKO Abiola it was difficult for him to imagine how he would speak to Nigerians in inauguration.

    “My mum told me how he would stand in the mirror when he was preparing his speech because the results were coming in; he thought he was going to deliver it. And you know he use to stammer, so he will start… “dear fellow Nigerians” but he never really got past fellow Nigerians.

    “He would say a few words, he would say; ‘not like that’ and then start again and he kept struggling to say what he would say to Nigerians. Because what MKO wanted to say to the Nigerian people and all that MKO did say to the people of Nigeria is to say, I love you the people of Nigeria, I believe in you the people of Nigeria.

    “He was born Yoruba but he loved Hausa people, Kanuri, Efik, Igbo people; he loved all. You just needed to be a Nigerian and MKO was your man. If he could help he would do.

    “There are so many things he already did to show and that was why the people of Nigeria rewarded him with the mandate of June 12, 1993. But we know that he was never able to deliver that speech, but in many ways, the event that transpired later revealed to Nigerians the eloquence in his heart, the fidelity of his commitment and even his own deep abiding wish that if there was anyway his own actions would in anyway compromise the people of Nigeria, MKO preferred to die, he preferred to leave the earth rather than compromise on you, on your integrity as a people and your sovereignty as a nation.

    “Which was why even the day before he died when he was still being pressured, he asked the question, ‘how do you shave the people’s heads in their absence?’. He knew he was present in the room he was pressured but he knew that so long as he refused to allow his own head to be shaved it was a symbolic message to you the people of Nigeria that you will be saved.

    “And when he died, we accepted his body and have watched in Nigeria as year after year till now the 25th year, you the people have suffered and he was not recognised at all.

    “President Muhammadu Buhari, Nelson Mandela it was who said, “It always seems impossible until it is done”.

    “Who would have ever believed, given the relationship that you had with Chief MKO Abiola, that you would be the instrument God will use to honour this man and to bring recognition and healing to the country.

    “You apologised to my family and it touched my heart. You know that I also lost my mother in this struggle, so that apology meant so much. Let me use this opportunity, on behalf of the Chief MKO Abiola because I know what he would have done; I use this opportunity to apologise to you, to apologise to your family, anything that he might have done to harm you and to harm your family.

    “Let me also say at this juncture that Chief MKO Abiola was so committed to us saying farewell to poverty in Nigeria and today we have more people in poverty in Nigeria than we had in 1993.

    “I read the statement that you made where you said we should prepare now to wage a battle for the defence of the people of Nigeria against those who think of themselves as the landlords of Nigeria. Let me say to you that by recognising June 12, you have awaken so many heroes and heroines of Nigeria’s struggle who have shown, because they stood firm on June 12, that money cannot buy them.

    “If there is any match that we need to match, if there is any protest that we need to be present to protest, you have called up your new own Army for the defence of this country. And President Muhammadu Buhari, this fight will not take you, God willing as it has taken MKO but let us fight and bring about the conclusion of MKO’s struggle that the Nigerian people should be the ones in full control of this country. It is not for a few landlords, whoever they may be; it is for the 200 million people of Nigeria.”

    MKO, the Messiah

    Kingibe praised the President for the courage in recognising June 12. He said: “The decision came to you naturally because you are a principled politician who refuses to be swayed by the expediency of the moment.”

    “Indeed, MKO was the messiah Nigerians never had the opportunity to feel his liberating impact. The annulment of June 12 election had the tragic consequence of dissolving that unity we as a people exhibited on that historic date and turning us into a divided people who began to see one another as enemies.

    “We must be thankful that we eventually survived the prolonged crisis, even with all the collateral damage to our body politic. Today, President Buhari has called upon us to inter the ghost of the acrimony surrounding June 12 and celebrate the principles and the joys it brought.”

    At the event were Vice President Yemi Osinbajo Governors Ibikunle Amosun (Ogun), Samuel Ortom (Benue), Rotimi Akeredolu (Ondo)  and Simon Lalong (Plateau).  Chief Bisi Akande, former Interim APC Chairman and APC National Chairman John Odigie-Oyegun, among other, were there.

     

  • June 12: The mandate

    Remarks prepared by Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka for the formal recognition of June 12, 1993 presidential election and conferment of national honours on stalwarts of that struggle.

    The annulment of the presidential elections of June 12, 1993 was a negative watershed in Nigerian history. It opened the floodgates of distrust, the consequences of which, sometimes in directions that are still in denial, have remained to plague the nation. There is much to remember, and some of this with a measure of satisfaction, even a sense of fulfillment. For many however, much of the memory is unbearable. A number still resort to desperate measures to cauterize the trauma of the consequent season of unprecedented inhumanity, occasioned by sheer lust for unchallenged power and total domination of the national environment. These are individuals who walk among us, with scars of horrendous torture, others whose lives remain permanently disrupted, and yet several more who have been pauperised beyond recovery. Some can never eradicate the ordeal of being compelled to witness the torture and dehumanisation of their relations, forced to watch, in order to force them to incriminate themselves or others, confess to deeds, and/or sympathies to which they were complete strangers. Yet, even these victims, direct victims, or sufferers from collateral wounds, may have succeeded in overcoming their ordeal, if only a concerted gesture of recognition, of restitution and vindication of their roles had been offered, a symbolic act towards potential closure, such as brings us together this day, June 12, 2018, a quarter of a century later.  It should never have waited this long. It required only a simple capacity for empathy, an act of moral courage, and a sense of belonging to that gamut of humanity from whom sacrifice is often extracted with or without their consent.

    That simple gesture, repeatedly advocated by millions, was denied. The burden of arrogance and vaunting self-centredness sat heavily on the shoulders of the beneficiaries of a collective struggle. They harvested, but could not bear to share, or render dues. Or simply lacked the imagination, and were devoid of a sense of honour. They lacked an understanding of history, and trivialised the emotions of fellow humanity.  Some could not even bear to name the symbol of that struggle for the restoration of civil dignity that is at the very basis of ordered social existence. That social actuality, the massed will of the people, is the ultimate voice of authority.  Civil society must therefore hold itself also culpable, numerous times, for laxity in its exertion. Here follows a simple instance that is not beyond recall of most of us here.

    The demand for national recognition of Moshood Abiola was at its most intense during the tenure of the primary beneficiary of Abiola’s sacrifice, one to whom the very name of that political martyr was anathema. I refer to the hosting of the All-Africa Games, COJA, for which I was then Cultural Consultant for the opening ceremonies. In his lifetime, Moshood Abiola, a man of many parts, many interests, and multiple personifications, was recognised across the continent and outside for his passion, his moral and material generosity to the sporting arena. Such was the magnitude of his contribution that he was conferred with the title of African Pillar of Sports by the Africa Union (AU).

    A stadium was under construction in preparation for the games and it was confidently expected, indeed loudly demanded that that stadium should bear his name. Indeed, many assumed that this so obvious, so painless, so inexpensive tribute would be paid him by his own nation. The COJA Games came, and went. I urged the media – you may check the archives – urged the media to ignore that president and simply continue to refer to the stadium as the Moshood Abiola Stadium. Keep at it, I exhorted, and it will not matter in the least whether or not the occupant of Aso Rock concedes the posthumous honour so overwhelmingly deserved. The people’s voice remains the ultimate decider, irrespective of the voice of power, petulance and pettiness.

    Today, I repeat that demand and urge it on this government. History is archived not only by the written word or oral narratives, but by a landscape that is strewn with the precipitates of human attainment.

    The media failed to take the bait. Society wearied and moved on. Instead, one of the major avenues of this very capital of the nation still bears the name of that ruler who is near uniformly execrated across the nation and vilified across the world. And I assert this despite recent affirmations of loyalty to that dictator from his erstwhile colleagues. Mr. President, let me state this directly: loyalty is a virtue, but it also can prove perverse. No matter, today, the plunge is being taken. Belated, yes. With an eye on electoral fortunes, undoubtedly. And somewhat diminished by a number of unsatisfactory details, some trivial, some significant, some debatable, others simply untenable – what matters is that a long evaded step towards the summit of closure has been taken.

    One sour note, even today, deserves special attention, since it goes to the heart of this depressing career of denial. How did that word “presumed” as in the expression “presumed winner” of an election, creep into the official communique? That seeming trivia goes beyond semantics. I was on my way to Brazil when pressure for my presence here today commenced and became overpowering by its very logicality. I did not do an about turn, aborting a prior engagement, in order to participate in a ritual of presumptions. That insertion is what we must deem “presumptuous”, even contemptuous of reality.  Moshood Kashimawo Abiola was, and remains the acclaimed, not presumed winner of the Nigerian June 12 1993 democratic elections, an event that manifested the collective and disciplined will of the Nigerian people in a most unambiguous manner.

    Let me testify that I was actually in Europe, at a conference, at the same time as the then Secretary-General of the Commonwealth, Chief Emeka Anyaoku. We shared the same hotel. As the results were being formally collated, posted and released, he continued to share them with me. There was no ambiguity about who was headed for outright victory – and so it proved!  Despite the last-minute efforts to terminate the process, the voting proceeded and was concluded. A clear winner emerged, without presumption or contestation. Even his opponent openly conceded defeat – that is, until he was pressured to backtrack and challenge those results by those whose interests lay outside any known democratic impulsion. I call on the media to ensure that that word “presumed” is blotted out permanently, in any existing and future dispatches. I therefore echo the call of legislators to have those results fully published, so as to lay the ghost of that presumptive qualifier. Dictators are free to annul the succession of day and night, the succession of drought and rains, but no mortal power, either in this world or in any other human habitation,  can annul the truth of that election.

    It was that truth that nerved Moshood Abiola to emerge and re-present himself to the people in the famous declaration of Epetedo, saying: My name is Moshood Kashimawo Abiola, and I am here to reclaim my mandate. Today, that mandate conferred upon Abiola is being reclaimed on his behalf. Whatever the motivation, the credit is undeniably yours.

    What matters for this nation is that after the inertia and avoidance of nearly two decades and a half, justice begins to find place in the agenda of governance. A principled step has been taken towards closure. In finding the courage to assume the mantle of redress, let it not matter to you in the least whether or not such a gesture translates into votes. In any case, you will never find out with any degree of certainty – only in the presumptions of pundits. What will go down in memory and history is that you finally confronted a political entitlement, long evaded, treasonably annulled and imprudently postponed, confronted the spectre of negative memory, and offered the nation a glimpse of the potential of healing. The rest lies in the unpredictable future.

    It only remains to me to pay tribute to hundreds of other protagonists of human liberty and the right of political volition. Only a few weeks ago, we celebrated the memory of one of the most consistent of such warriors – Gani Fawehinmi, Senior Advocate of the Masses – also befittingly honoured today. And two weeks ago, we gathered at the graveside of Kudirat Abiola on the anniversary of her brutal murder. And there was Musa Yar’Adua, who mobilised resistance from within a legislature that appeared cowed, submissive and compromised. They read Sanni Abacha the riot act, sent him an ultimatum. Yar’Adua was unquestionably murdered in prison for his dare. And there were assassinations with a dictator’s blooded palm prints all over the corpses – Alfred Rewane, Felix Ibru, Olu Onaguruwa (a case of mistaken identity) and so on and on.  Nor must we ever forget the hundreds of others, many of them unsung, even nameless.

    For special mention however, I cannot avoid recalling, with pride and nostalgia, our late Comrade Ola Oni, who is very rarely evoked these days. Yet, it was he who mobilised others and led the massed resistance in Ibadan – the epicentre, some may recall – being the propitiously named Liberty Stadium, where he and a sparse but dedicated gathering, after an all-night convergence, moved out at dawn to stall the roller-coaster of a manic ruler in its tracks, thus stemming the spreading tide of civic surrender. Let those highlights remain in our memories, such as that routing of a would-be life dictator on a campaign to entrench himself in power through co-option of slavish surrogates. Let each and any one of our known resisters – Bagauda Kaltho, Chris Ubani, Beko Ransome-Kuti and all others – always serve as recollection prods in our minds for massed resistance in face of any massive state terror machine, however ruthless.

    These martyrs deserve a collective memorial, as a sign that the struggle for human freedom admits no statute of limitations. Reverses yes, often unavoidably – that is the nature of struggle – but abject surrender? The answer is pre-eminent in the words of one man, who stood tall as he toured the streets of Lagos in an open vehicle, declaring: “My name is Moshood Abiola. It is time to reclaim my mandate.”

  • June 12: The layers of Buhari’s declaration

    The life of Chief M.K.O Abiola was exemplary. He was a true Nigerian success story and an inspiration to many at home and abroad. His ability to connect with people of diverse backgrounds was perhaps his greatest strength and this worked to his advantage in many ways. Even now, in death, his uniting touch is still being felt by Nigerians, most recently in light of the momentous declaration by President Muhammadu Buhari. The sad note that sullied Abiola’s list of achievements may have finally been redressed by the declaration of June 12, the day Abiola won and lost his presidential mandate, as the new public holiday to celebrate democracy day in Nigeria.

    While the development is welcome all over the country and seen as a crown on the efforts of the Abiola family to gain official recognition of M.K.O Abiola’s victory at the polls many years ago, the political angle to the declaration is laced with suspicion of ulterior motives by the Buhari administration. All possible implications of the declaration are important at this time in the country, if for no other reason than to understand the thinking and motives of an important player in the next elections, for good or bad, and the possible consequences.

    Many will be quick to claim the declaration as a victory for all Yorubas. Indeed, the reactions from some top Yoruba personalities already show this leaning. Interestingly, Afenifere, the pan-Yoruba socio-political group, while accepting the declaration, was cautious in its celebration by calling the president’s motives to question. Many other groups believe there are no other aspects to the declaration than the political motive of winning southwest votes. The mixed reactions are an accurate portrayal of the volatile mood of the country in this election season, and the president’s timing with the declaration adds in no small way to the suspicions of his motives from many quarters.

    In any case, whichever way one leans on the issue of the declaration, the deed has been done and it is a wholly positive outcome. It is however not a Yoruba or southwest victory, but a victory for Nigerian freedom and democracy. The pain of the annulment of the June 12 elections was felt country wide, not just on the day but for many years under the harsh rule of General Sani Abacha. The people’s access to liberty and an open society was truncated for reasons that most Nigerians will never understand.

    Overtime, the scar of June 12 outgrew mere anger and accusations against the government of the day on June 12, 1993, as it metamorphosed into a yearning for free and fair elections and the true right of the people to choose their leaders. Some will say that the date became bigger than the man Abiola himself. This is why the declaration of June 12 as democracy day is appropriate, as the date has come to represent the continuous struggle for people’s right at the polls, and its symbolism is now, at least, assured in the annals of Nigerian politics.

    While the symbolism of June 12 has rightly been acknowledged, it is very unlikely that there is no political angle to the declaration. Like many have said before, everything a politician does is political. The camp of people that are of the opinion that there may be possible political benefits of the declaration in the southwest zone may not be far from the truth. In-fighting in the All Progressives Congress, APC creates the impression that the president cannot rely squarely on the strength of the party to ensure victory next year. The question is, if the June 12 declaration is a gesture to pacify the Southwest as some say, what then is/will be the northern or southeastern pacification plan? Surely the president must be aiming to collect votes in every region. If one were to believe this theory of pure political motive, then there is yet more intrigue in the horizon.

    Also likely, on the political spectrum, is the retaliation angle. General Ibrahim Babangida and former president, Olusegun Obasanjo have come out publicly to speak against the Buhari administration and any second term ambitions of the president. Their public criticism resonated with people in all parts of the country and the present administration scrambled to address their remarks, especially the not so subtle condemnation by Obasanjo. The embarrassment suffered from the perceived betrayal of members of the ‘caucus of generals’ may have warranted repercussions that may already be in the works. The declaration of June 12 as the new democracy day casts a bad light on both men in many ways.

    For Babangida, the declaration is a condemnation of his government’s decision in 1993, with the consequential stigma of being labeled an anti-democracy icon. For Obasanjo, his pedigree in southwest politics has been dealt a great blow after failing to honour Abiola in his two terms as president. The two past leaders have now been essentially branded enemies of democracy. In Obasanjo’s case also, some see it as a personal blow. Obasanjo has always been suspected of nursing enmity towards Abiola, his tribesman and former schoolmate.

    Obasanjo was deputy editor while Abiola was editor of “The Trumpeter” the school magazine of Baptist Boys High School, Abeokuta, where they both attended.  Their kinship did not stop the rumours that Obasanjo was never in support of Abiola during his lifetime and even worked to suppress any state recognition of his struggles after his death. The narcissist Obasanjo carries on like one who is only content in the centre of all things and cannot bear to be second favourite in anything, which may have been his issue with the better loved Abiola.

    The late Abiola was a champion of the people who deployed his means liberally in promoting worthy causes and contributing to the lives of others. Although he was a muslim, he contributed to the building of churches and mosques across Nigeria and was accepted by all Nigerians. Abiola held chieftaincy titles in 68 communities across the country. He was equally accepted abroad, receiving international recognition during his lifetime and after his death. Like Gani Fawehinmi, fellow posthumous honoree, he was a crusader for freedom and rights of people, and he gave his life to stand for these ideals when he could have taken the coward’s way out.

    It is immensely satisfying that Abiola’s status in the democratic history of the country is now being recognized and Nigerians should not let any other issues connected with the declaration dilute the importance and symbolism of this long over-due recognition. Oftentimes in life, victory is achieved when it is most unexpected and the victory for democracy and freedom that June 12 symbolises can never be extinguished. Although it has come at a time when the security forces and government agencies serve with an unusually heavy hand, the current situation merely strengthens the ideals that June 12 represents and underscores the need for the people’s will to shine forth in the midst of oppression.

    Slowly, the country is moving in the right direction. The forces of change have been diverse and sometimes unexpected, but the important thing is that negative forces are canceling out each other, to the benefit of the people. When justice begins to be seen as an attainable right, then there will be many more champions like late Abiola. Henceforth, democracy day will be a celebration of unity and possibilities in a free society and June 12 will become a symbol of the future and not the past. May God bless Nigeria.

  • June 12, military cult and PMB’s ritual offering

    It is difficult not to read politics to President Muhammadu Buhari’s avowal of June 12 last week. If posthumous awards for MKO and Gani Fawehinmi were truly intended to re-connect the President to the progressive community in an election year, it has turned out a master-stroke indeed, going by the outpouring of goodwill for the general in the past week.

    The man likely to be biting his finger this hour discreetly must be Goodluck Janathan. Like many things he attempted in five years, the immediate past president bungled the bid to appropriate some mileage from June 12. His renaming UNILAG “MAU” (or MAU-MAU as traducers cheekily chose to echo in a backhand invocation of Kenya’s notorious coloinial Mau-Mau guerrillas) dried up almost immediately with the ink it was written.

    Perhaps, this time, the fakir from Daura was shrewd enough to engage the right medicine man for a better charm. Only that could explain while whereas the Fawehinmi family flung back medal similarly offered posthumously by Jonathan (just the same way Gani had rejected Umar Yar’Adua’s earlier in 2008), Buhari’s has been accepted with both hands in gratitude.

    But if we care to look deeper, there is surely a silver lining yet above the cloud of partisan opportunism here. Coming twenty-five years after the fact, the gesture could, in a way, be taken as an act of penance by a penitent member of a military caste that had violated democracy.

    As the ululation continues to echo across the nation over Buhari’s proclamation, Ibrahim Babangida must be a sad man today. His melancholy must be compounded by the shame of being finally exposed as nothing but a con man.

    Deluded IBB obviously wanted to do what none of his military forebears had done. He coveted eternal power but lacked the courage to come out openly and say so. While attempting to steal MKO’s popular mandate, he not only sold the nation a lie but also sought to cauterize national memory against remembering. Beaten to a corner, the “evil genius” then conceived the devious Interim National Government to wipe the memory of June 12.

    The same way OBJ could not be happy that the man, whose huge sacrifice he toiled so hard to deny even as little as a mere mention, is now being festooned with the nation’s highest garland posthumously. Neither could the Ota chicken farmer be amused that Gani who peppered him relentlessly with the worst invectives imaginable as “imperial president” would now be officially addressed as GCON.

    Nor could General T Y Danjuma also possibly have any cause to pop champagne at the good tidings. When the old Taraba-born warrior made himself available at one of the early “pro-democracy” summits in Lagos immediately after the annulment, he could barely conceal his impatience for the niceties of democracy. At some point, he was famously quoted as telling off pesky journalists: “Gentlemen, you know I’ve little or no time for all this your long talk about democracy. I’m here simply because I don’t like that man (IBB) there.”

    Or can thieving Sani Abacha, memorably dismissed as “intellectual midget trying to bring the nation down to his level” by Professor Wole Soyinka, be mollified for that matter. How depressing it must be for him wherever he is today to hear that MKO chained down for four years till he (the captor) died and who would curiously drop dead exactly a month later after him would now share the honour as fellow GCFR!

    Undoubtedly, June 12 annulment was the last act in a concatenation of defilements by two generations of buccaneering generals.

    In all its historicity, June 12 was a powerful expression by a nation that would appear to have outgrown the military that had held it down for a decade. By overwhelmingly endorsing a Muslim-Muslim ticket and voting above ethnic cleavages, the people could only be telling the generals the excuse of national fragility they kept retailing for hanging on to power was no longer tenable.

    In what must then be a fitting closure to history, it has now taken a general to uproot a lie planted by a fellow general twenty-five years ago. It is in the same spirit that we continue to yearn for a closure to the puzzle over the liquidation by parcel bomb of citizen Dele Giwa 32 years ago when the same general was law-giver. The same way the nation would seek an update on Buhari’s earlier order that the police reopen the murder cases of Bola Ige, Marshal Harry et al during the reign of another general.

    Now, let no one downplay the therapeutic benefit of establishing the truth. For that is the first sure step to national healing. Truth may hurt initially, but it heals ultimately.

    This moral joint is what is missing in the argument by the likes of former Chief Justice Alfa Belgore who seem obsessed with the letter – rather than the spirit – of law. They had argued that since it is impossible to have MKO and Gani physically present, awarding the honour would be vain.

    Not surprising, one Umar Ardo, an OBJ’s barefoot lackey, has floated the laughable idea of going to court to challenge Buhari’s decision.

    Though Femi Falana, SAN has done well to shine the light on the portion that might have appeared grey to the nay-sayers, it bears repeating that that is just what the spirit of law could also have envisaged. June 12 is never a speculation. It is a truth. To act or argue otherwise is to continue to dignify the big lie IBB told 25 years ago.

    The spirit of fundamentalism is inevitable in those who truly knew June 12 and lived its dark days intimately. I confess my own extremism here, having worked then as a young reporter in Concord Press owned by MKO.

    For the nation at large, perhaps what had made the trauma more unbearable was the culture of denial foisted and sustained with state might over the years. That lie first manifested in the specter of Ernest Shonekan who did not consider it dishonorable to seek to exercise power he neither won by ballot or secured by bullet.

    When the supremos of the now discredited military finally accepted to relinquish power in 1999, they strategically chose the eve of June 12 to disengage. The culture of denial was sustained by OBJ, ironically the biggest beneficiary of June 12, who now proceeded to indulge in perhaps the worst act of Gregorian incest by proclaiming May 29 (his own inauguration day) as Democracy Day in sheer contempt of the historic day Nigerians truly voted a new nation and in cruel denial of the supreme price paid by MKO and other martyrs.

    The Ota-based narcissist probably saw acknowledging June 12 as a favour to MKO, forgetting it was a historic duty to the nation actually violated. What’s more, soon after OBJ took over, the teaching of History was abrogated from our school syllabus, perhaps in order that the young Nigerians would never have the opportunity of knowing such sordid aspects of the nation’s past.

    No one put it better than Adams Oshiomhole, labour icon and former Edo governor, in a reaction to Buhari’s offering: “How ironic that over the years, those who emerged the beneficiaries of June 12 would toil real hard to designate their own coronation day falsely as Democracy Day over the moment Nigerians actually voted democracy.”

    If nothing at all, with the executive proclamation of June 6, credit must be given to Buhari for somehow bringing integrity back to national award. What further elevates the medals bestowed on MKO and Gani is its exclusivity. This is the first time the administration is awarding national honours since assuming office in 2015. A sharp departure from the past when national medals were dispensed yearly on industrial scale to recipients, many of whom in real life embody anything but honour. So much that at one of such bazaars, President Goodluck Jonathan was left to merely read out names of awardees without handing out commemorative medal or certificate, simply because his people kept updating the list until the last minute!

    Later, rumour of a racket began to swirl involving a ranking member of the administration. It was as if “bank alerts” were still pouring in while the brochure was already at the printer’s. In sum, award of national medal must be tied to idea or exertion that truly advances community or country. Only then will it have meaning or value.

    As for Baba Gana Kingibe, the fact that he is decorated with GCON being MKO’s running-mate can hardly launder his hands. He has benefited only from the technicality of history.

    By the way, curiously missing among surviving SDP top brass invited by Aso Rock to the June 12 ceremony was Chief Tony Anenih, ironically the chairman of the winning party. It could not have been an oversight, but an omission borne out of emotional intelligence and due regard for the sensibilities of a nation still haunted by a difficult memory. For the education of Nigerians yet unborn or too young to understand the main issue during that historic decade, Chief Anenih’s moral stamina failed him in the hour of temptation.

    Lacking character when it mattered most, Anenih led the colluding faction of SDP leadership that acquiesced to Babangida’s inducement to trade June 12 away. Even while the knife that stabbed MKO in the back politically was still dripping blood, Anenih and co had earnestly begun to position themselves for seats in the ING.

    His career of treachery continued when his old political mentor and benefactor, Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, later ended up in Abacha’s gulag in 1995 after valiantly spear-heading the lobby at the 1994 Constitutional Conference that fixed January 1996 as exit day for Abacha.

    Without hesitation or shame, jobbing Anenih again made himself available to be used to torpedo the popular motion championed by now incarcerated Tafida Katsina, removing the last obstacle to Abacha’s self-succession circus.

    So, had renegades like Anenih dared to gatecrash June 12 memorial yesterday regardless, it would have been entirely surprising if the ghost of doughty MKO did not haunt them around the gallery relentlessly.

     

     

  • Shehu Sani, Adams: those who annulled June 12 must apologise

    A HUMAN rights activist and lawmaker, Senator Shehu Sani and National Coordinator of Oodua People’s Congress (OPC) and Aare Onakakanfo of Yorubaland Gani Adams have urged those who annulled and betrayed June 12, 1993 presidential election to apologise.

    Sani, who spoke yesterday in Ogba, Lagos, at the 25th anniversary of the June 12, 1993 presidential poll, said it was unfortunate that “these saboteurs did not allow the late Chief MKO Abiola to realise his dream of enabling Nigerians to say farewell to poverty.

    “I hail President Muhammadu Buhari for recognising and declaring June 12 as Democracy Day, but he should ensure that the senseless killings ongoing in the country are stopped.

    “The greatest honour President Buhari can do to the late Chief Abiola is to sustain his ideals by promoting unity and ensuring that Nigerians enjoy the good things of life.

    “Traitors of June 12 must not be honoured. Those who worked for the late Gen. Sani Abacha and Gen. Ibrahim Babangida to truncate the June 12, 1993 presidential poll must not be honoured.”

    The senator lambasted the people who abandoned Chief Abiola during the struggle and hailed heroes of democracy like the late Gani Fawehinmi, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Prof.  Wole Soyinka, the late Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti and others “for ensuring that Nigerians now enjoy democracy”.

    Adams thanked Buhari for “taking this bold initiative of honouring the late Abiola and the late Fawehinmi.”

    He said Nigerians would not forget him for putting the country’s democratic history in the right perspective.

    Adams added: “All over the world, issues of security, good health, education, enduring social structure and good economy always take the centre stage.

    “I implore the Buhari administration to take care of these and other good things of life, which will ameliorate Nigerians’ sufferings.

    “The way we clamoured and struggled to make June 12 Democracy Day, we need to make sacrifice, struggle and make a case for restructuring.

    “We need to stand firm and raise our voices in support of restructuring. If Nigeria is restructured, the federating units or states will develop at their own pace.

    “Our democracy has been so monetised that to some Nigerians, it defies logic. The result is that electoral malpractice has become the order of the day.”

    Chairman of Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Lagos State Council Dr. Qasim Akinreti hailed President Buhari for doing justice at the right time by recognising Chief Abiola and declaring June 12 as Democracy Day.

    Personalities who fought for June 12 were given awards at the event.

     

  • Abiola: June 12 and the birth of ‘Guerrilla journalism’

    Below are excerpts from Sunday Dare’s book “Guerrilla Journalism: Dispatches from the Underground”. The excerpts capture the modus operandi of The News/ Tempo magazines under military administration of self-styled military President Ibrahim Babangida.

    The News magazine team led by Bayo Onanuga was in the forefront of the actualisation of Abiola’s mandate. It paid dearly for it. But it birthed a new culture in Nigeria’s journalism. From the book Guerrilla Journalism: Dispatches from the Underground”, authored by Sunday Dare, a staff of The News/Tempo magazine, we are served intricate details of that struggle.

    “Then came the June 12 elections and the triumph that The News beat everyone to the punch by publishing the comprehensive results of the presidential elections for Nigerians and the world to see. This was the story that Bayo Onanuga once said gave him the greatest satisfaction.

    Against all odds, operating underground in defiance of proscription laws, and with depleted operational resources, the magazine still came out with an edition that revealed the results of the polls. They showed Chief MKO Abiola, a Muslim Yoruba Southerner, in a clear lead and within a hair’s breadth of electoral victory. The military rulers had the same figures and moved to totally erase the results from the country’s memory. The military ordered the nation’s electoral body, based in Abuja, to stop releasing the results as they came in from all states. Millions of shocked Nigerians waited with baited breath for a pronouncement from the military announcing the winner. It never came.

    One of the biggest cover stories that angered the military perhaps, was The News’ edition of June 28, 1993, titled: “Conspiracy: Desperate Attempt to Abort Democracy.” The story zeroed in on the foot-dragging and indecisiveness of the military government to declare and accept the result of the June 12, 1993 elections. Yinka Tella, the Bureau Chief in Abuja, pieced together exclusive details and information about secret meetings and the sinister agenda of some military generals. They, and a few traditional rulers and civilians, connived to derail the return of democracy to Nigeria.

    The magazine published these stories and many more while underground, with its operations scattered, after security agents had taken over its offices. In fact, after the big raid in May 1993, in a fit of paranoia, Gen. Babangida proscribed The News by means of a military decree. The decree outlawed the production, reproduction, circulation and consumption of the titles from the Independent Communications Network Limited’s stable, but the letter of proscription was unsigned, just like the letter that announced the annulment of the June 12 elections. The magazine was clearly under the hammer for publishing stories that frontally attacked the military government and demanded accountability in all facets of the country’s national life. After months of unsuccessful covert and overt attempts to arrest journalists of The News and to locate and shut down their new operational base, the regime wielded its big stick.

    When the proscription came, the reaction was that of defiance: We resolved to ignore the law and continue to publish. Undaunted, the team soldiered on. From this time on, things on all fronts were never the same. On the reporting, production and circulation fronts, every day became a battle. Though not fully prepared for such hostility, we all embraced it with rare determination.

    In his book, Jailed for Life, Kunle Ajibade recalls that the most popular of the cover stories produced from the underground was the interview with the former military ruler, Gen. Mohammed Buhari, anchored by Dapo Olorunyomi. After several months of making contacts, telephone calls, and vigils at the General’s gate, spearheaded primarily by the late Kaduna State correspondent of The News, Baguada Kaltho, the Gen finally agreed to an interview. It was an exclusive, which sent shock-waves through the corridors of power. In the interview, titled “Why I was Toppled,” Gen. Buhari was unsparing in his criticism of the Gen. Babangida regime, speaking up for the first time about the toppling of his government, his experience in detention, and bluntly handing the current dictator red cards on several issues. In the interview, Gen. Buhari did not spare his own constituency; he blamed the military for some of the problems that continue to hold Nigeria down. It was a ringing indictment: “…this military institution we know best has been desecrated, infiltrated and perverted.”

    That edition of The News sold over one hundred thousand copies. Around the country, many Nigerians made (photo) copies because they could not find the original to buy. The interview so jolted Gen. Babangida, who was repeatedly described by Buhari as “the fifth columnist,” that he immediately declared the five founding editors of the magazine, Bayo Onanuga, Babafemi Ojudu, Dapo Olorunyomi, Kunle Ajibade and Seye Kehinde wanted men by the military government on national television.

    With the hammer dangling, proscription in hand, being harassed out of newsrooms and with no base, troops scattered, the publication almost ran out of operational funds. With security agents on its principal’s heels, the immediate fate of The News hung in the balance. Under these circumstances, The News’ editors met to decide their next steps. Olorunyomi recalls that historic meeting that spawned guerrilla journalism.

    “What next? That was the crux of the meeting. The editorial captains spoke. The consensus was in support of defiance. The nature and form was in question… That was the real beginning. Thus, the beginning of defiant journalism can be located at this juncture in time and not in mood. In mood, it had always been there. Because, we knew that this operation will not succeed without paying some price.”

    Up to this point, the magazine was still being published under its title, The News. The May 1993 proscription of the magazine, the enormous risk and attacks being inflicted on journalists working for it, on vendors who sold the magazine, and on the Nigerians who dared to read the now prohibited magazine led to the founding of Tempo magazine, which can best be described as a “child of circumstance.”

    The swift decision to push Tempo into the market was taken when the initial attempt to produce The News, after its ban, in a tabloid-paper form, met with stiff resistance by security agents. Virtually all of the forty thousand copies of The News’ edition published in tabloid form were seized. Tempo continued in the tradition of The News with a bolder prosecutorial brand of journalism that held the feet of those in power to fire; it dared all and feared none. Like a light set upon a hill, every week Tempo made it to the newsstand, and it lighted the way for the struggle to continue. Though writing and publishing most of these stories was daring and difficult, yet Tempo never relented.

    The courageous decisions of The News to defy the military decree proscribing it and continue to publish underground made many Nigerian journalists realize they could establish their publications and tread a similar path of defiance. Publications like Dateline, from the Tell magazine stable, on June 12, Razor and others soon emerged. Each time a publication was banned or its copies were seized another publication surfaced from the underground. In our case, we simply went back to produce new copies of any seized edition, to the chargrin of the state security officers.

    This new trend in Nigerian journalism, was captured by Rotimi Sankore when he observed that:

    “The experience of The News made other journalists realize that it was possible to publish without having a known or permanent office. As a result, a plethora of publications sprang up to challenge the military.”

    And, like The News which had been proscribed, Tempo carried interviews with activists, opposition leaders, retired generals, and it published investigative reports about the government that other media dared not use. It was rewarded for its courage by an unprecedented increase in its patronage and, perhaps, for the first time in the history of media investments in Nigeria, sales revenue was able to pay the way of the magazine, due to the appreciation of Nigerians who never stopped buying it. Tempo’s birth continued the tradition of defiant journalism and, in the years that followed, signposted a new journalistic brazenness never before witnessed in the annals of Nigeria’s media-cum-political history.

    Gbile Oshadipe’s courage and the venom of his pen compensated for his petit size.

    A pioneer member of staff of The News who joined from The Guardian newspapers was, like others, at the center of the transition from The News to Tempo. Nick-named the “compact giant” by Prof Adebayo Williams, Gbile’s role was most significant because, apart from being the first Editor of Tempo, it was actually in his house on A Close, 3rd Avenue, Gowon Estate, that the founders of The News – Dapo Olorunyomi, Idowu Obasa, Kunle Ajibade, Seye Kehinde and Femi Ojudu, decided to respond to the proscription of The News. Gbile recalls an earlier meeting he had with Bayo Onanuga at The News office, off Osolo Way, Lagos:

    “Bayo wanted to know whether I had the capacity to ensure that The News will be on the newsstands the following Monday morning, whatever happens.”

    With the proscription of The News, Gbile was named the head of the editorial team of Tempo, which made him, in effect, the editor. Tempo was published by Bookmate Publications, one of the companies registered by The News group at its inception. Gbile then believed, with the benefit of hindsight, that he was saddled with this responsibility because the thinking of the founders at that particular time was that the magazine’s problems would probably be for a short while. Unknown to them, it was the beginning of a long, dark, difficult and dangerous journey.

    But Gbile was left in good company. The network of crack and intrepid correspondents spread around the country, who had been tutored largely by the cerebral and most intrepid of all reporters, Olorunyomi, were running the ground and churning out great stories and interviews. In Lagos, the brilliant minds of Ayo Arowolo, Akin Adesokan, Ebenezer Obadare, Simidele Awosika, Jenkins Alumona, Ike Okonta, Bayo Fayoyin, an exceptional graphics designer, and his assistant, Adeyemi Akinlabi and photographer, Monday Emoni, teamed up to ensure the magazine never lost is bite and reputation.

    This rag-tag team of The News magazine, now Tempo, were holed up in a dingy office-space in central Lagos, often with no electricity or running water, no air-conditioners except a couple of fans to help cool the over-worked and over-heated computers. Its rickety wooden stairs were equally a challenge to climb. This editorial bunker in the Bamgbose area of Lagos, owned by a friend of one of the founding editors, Gbenga Fagbemi, was a most brazen location for them to operate from. It was less than a mile from the popular Dodan Barracks, a military fortress that served as the State House, from which Nigeria’s military rulers ruled. For an “illegal” publication, which already had all its editors wanted and the journalists working for it in serious danger, to choose to operate from a location very close to its pursuers was unthinkable. But, that was what happened. The team was willing to take any risk to ensure that the magazine never died.

    The first edition of Tempo came out 19th of July, 1993.

    From this point on, there was no let-up. Every new edition was anticipated and expected by millions of Nigerians who had become enamored of the freshness of our reports and, most especially, by the courage that went into writing and publishing these stories in the face of enormous dangers.

    On the other hand, those in power waited in fear and anger for each new edition of Tempo magazine. Fear, because their illegal deeds might be exposed and anger because they had no way of stopping us with our blistering guerrilla style. In fact, the first print run of 50,000 copies of the Tempo magazine was seized. The magazine simply ordered a reprint. Once the magazine hit the streets, we went back into the underground to begin work on the next edition. If the proscribed The News magazine gave the military regime goose pimples, the arrival of the underground publication, Tempo made them sweat. And, they did everything to make sure it never survived. Copies were impounded at printing houses and seized on the streets. Vendors were beaten to a pulp on the streets by the security for daring to sell Tempo and Nigerians were hauled off buses and cars and harassed for daring to read it.

    In spite of the odds, the magazine continued to circulate. Almost all of us working with the magazine became vendors as did our friends and family members who bought several copies and sold them. Both in Jos and while in Abuja, I personally sold hundreds of copies each week by moving from one office to another. Most Nigerians soon perfected a novel way to make re-prints by making copies of the original, because the magazine sold out quickly in most locations while in some areas, only few were available, the original copies having been seized by the security.

    We never failed to make it to the newsstands each week. The new operational procedure took shape. Secrecy was the most important asset we employed. From the production that was divided into many different stages, to the printing of the magazines that was done at different printing houses scattered around Lagos and the several “drop” locations for journalists to leave their stories, secrecy was a guiding principle.

    With its proscription, the magazine’s journey to the underground began, unknown to many. The News magazine defied the military regime and went ahead to gather and publish news and information. The first chapter of guerrilla journalism in Nigeria commenced, albeit unconsciously, when in 1993, The News magazine defied the military regime and went ahead to gather and publish news and information. Rotimi Sankore, a Nigerian journalist and founding campaign secretary of the Nigerian Journalists for Democratic Rights (JODER) wrote this about the condition under which the press operated and how The News and Tempo birthed guerrilla journalism. “Although virtually all independent media (and some state-owned ones) suffered from the arbitrariness of military rule, none suffered as much as the ‘guerrilla press,’ made up of a number of weekly news and magazines. These magazines published stories which others would simply not consider. The leaders of the guerrilla press were and still are The News and Tempo weekly magazines.”

    The life of my colleagues and myself soon became a nomadic one with the incessant attacks, harassment and trailing by the government security agencies. Bayo Onanuga, Dapo Olorunyomi, Babafemi Ojudu, Seye Kehinde, Yinka Tella and a host of other editorial team members of the magazine, became constant guests of the state security agents.

    Ojudu, the magazine’s managing editor, who was locked up a record 14 times during the years of our underground operations, in an interview with Sun News online, described the time as challenging and interesting. “There were days when, sometimes, I sat down and asked how, collectively, we were able to do this …”

    During this period and thereafter, Prof Williams was a principal figure in providing the hounded magazine editors and reporters a semblance of cover while they went underground.

    Prof Soyinka went on to recall how: “When two or three years later, Gen Abacha came into power, their guerrilla tactics appeared to have been already honed. The garage behind my office on Lalubu Street was perhaps the earliest mobile office of the Samizdat…”

    Guerrilla journalism turned us into nomadic journalists, constantly on the move, with no fixed address. What was fixed was that the magazine always showed up on the streets every week.

    We were constantly on the move, watching over our shoulders. Chased out of our offices, we found different alternatives to continue to do our work.

    For me, the initial phase of the underground operation commenced when I was in the Middle Belt as a correspondent. But, just as the fame and reputation of our stories and writings reached across the country, so also did the security dragnet for journalists around the country, aimed at us.

    Odia Ofeimun, who can without doubt, be described as a political scientist, essayist, prolific poet, writer, polemicist and perhaps one of the longest-serving bachelors in Nigeria, was the editorial board chairman of The News and Tempo magazines. A cerebral scholar and political scientist, Odia’s analysis of political events were most perceptive and searing. His very distinctive work and journey as the assistant to the political sage, Obafemi Awolowo, have defined his reputation and rise as an indispensable intellect and mind on political administration.

    “No one who was not a guerrilla journalist could practise properly without the kind of ambience provided by guerrilla journalism. And the so-called guerrilla journalist had an edge over the others for one reason. Those who sneered at them always had to follow their lead. They set the agenda in a lot of ways. If other newspapers failed to carry a particular item but the guerrilla journalist featured it, it would become public property. Therefore other newspapers had to try hard to catch up with the guerrilla journalists ….Suffice it to say that if there was no guerrilla journalism, there probably would not have been an end to military rule,” Odia asserted convincingly.

    While in Jos, I knew little peace. This was between 1993 and 1995. I was, for the most part, incognito. Constantly on the move, if I told anyone I was headed downtown in Jos, I made straight for the uptown of the city. If I told even some of my colleagues I was headed out of town, I remained and operated underground. Like my colleagues in The News, I relied on my instincts. I disappeared immediately from any place as soon as I felt danger. I used different offices and methods to send in my stories. Sometimes, through human courier or fax, or I simply dictated it on the phone. If the story was an exclusive or too hot, my editors asked me to travel down to Lagos for a debriefing. Then I sat down to weave the cover story with the help of other journalists on the team.

    The work of the defiant press eventually centered on The News and Tempo magazines. For me, it was, in a way, somehow anticipated. I remember we had spoken about the need for an editorial philosophy of partisan objectivity on the side of truth. So, it was an attempt to bring in the social responsibility of the media in our own kind of society and also the professional disinterestedness of an arbiter, and, rather than pretend that, okay, you won’t be partisan or pretend that you could be objective, we spoke around the synthesis of what we call, then, partisan objectivity.

     

  • Photo: Ambode unveils new Moshood Abiola statue

     Lagos state Governor, Akinwunmi Ambode on Tuesday, unveiled the New Chief Moshood Abiola Statue in Ojota.