Tag: Keystone Bank

  • Keystone Bank’s training academy gets CIBN accreditation

    Keystone Bank’s training academy gets CIBN accreditation

    The Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria (CIBN) has certified and granted full accreditation status to the Keystone Bank Limited Training Academy in Lagos, in recognition of its compliance with regulatory standards and best practices.

    The certification came at the end of a recent evaluation exercise carried out by the CIBN which is the sole accreditation agency under the Competency Framework for the country’s Banking and Finance Industry put in place by the Central Bank of Nigeria.

    The Keystone Bank Training Academy is a full-fledged learning and development centre responsible for the continuous building of skills and the expansion of knowledge base of new and existing workers of the bank.

    In the letter communicating the development, the institute commended the bank for its consistent efforts towards meeting high standards for the benefit of the banking industry and larger economy.

    Part of the accreditation is the exemption of trainees who are successful at the Keystone Bank Entry Level from nine courses from a total of nineteen in the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria Professional Certification examination.

    Commenting on the award, the Group Managing Director/CEO of Keystone Bank Limited, Mr. Obeahon Ohiwerei said, “We believe strongly in the need for continuous learning and self-improvement.

    Providing top-notch training is one way we groom and build our people to be more competent and vibrant, thereby launching the Bank to ground breaking achievements and performance overtime.”

    “This of course will produce leading professional bankers who will lead not just the industry but the economy at large.”
    Keystone Bank is a technology and service-driven commercial bank offering convenient and reliable solutions to its customers.

  • TSA: No hidden funds in Keystone Bank – Management

    TSA: No hidden funds in Keystone Bank – Management

    Keystone Bank Limited has denied concealing funds meant to be transferred into the Federal Government’s Treasury Single Account.

    The Federal High Court in Lagos had on Thursday ordered seven commercial banks to temporarily remit a total of $793.2m allegedly hidden by them in contravention of the Federal Government’s TSA policy.

    But Keystone Bank, in a statement on Friday said, “In response to the news making the rounds that the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos had made an order directing Keystone Bank Limited to remit the sum of $17m allegedly illegally kept in its custody to the TSA, we wish to state that Keystone Bank has never illegally hidden any amount of money belonging to the Federal Government or any of its agencies.

    “Details of all Federal Government funds in custody of Keystone Bank had always been fully disclosed to all relevant Federal Government agencies and at no time did Keystone Bank collude or ‎conspire with any official of the Federal Government to disobey the Federal Government directives on the TSA.

    The lender informed its stakeholders that it would not conduct itself in breach of the laws or policies of the government, including the TSA policy.

    “We are taking appropriate steps to respond to the issues raised in the Court Order,” the bank added.

  • Questions over sale  of Keystone Bank

    Questions over sale of Keystone Bank

    What manner of sale?

    When the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) announced the sale of Keystone Bank to Sigma Golf Nigeria Limited and Riverbank Investment Resources Limited (the Sigma Golf-Riverbank Consortium) recently, it didn’t envisaged that the process would be subjected to some sort of public scrutiny at all since in its reckoning the deal was in a manner of speaking a very simple matter!

    But stakeholders don’t consider it a simple matter as such as they have expressed concerns bordering on the lack of transparency of the entire process.

    The Keystone Bank, previously known as Bank PHB, was among the three banks nationalised by the CBN in 2011, after failing a stress test conducted by the apex bank.

    Crux of the matter

    At issue is that some analysts have described the process which led to the sale of the bank as an exercise lacking in “proper due diligence.”

    The sale of the bank, the analysts alleged, was done without following extant takeover provisions.

    At the risk of being accused of making vacuous pontification, these critics based the plank of their arguments on certain incontrovertible facts as follows:

    According to these critics, the audited financial statement of the bank for the period ended June 30, 2015 showed that Keystone Bank had total assets of N317.6 billion with a customer loan of N98.2 billion, deposits of N245 billion and total equity of N18.9 billion.

    As at April 2016, the bank had a staff strength of 1,753 employees, network of 154 branches, nine cash centres and 315 Automated Teller Machines.

    Judging by the bank’s fundamentals, they therefore wondered why the bank which such high networth should not be able to attract a better deal compared to what it got if AMCON actually didn’t undervalue the company.

    Besides, a global search on the two firms which acquired the bank did not reveal any existing profile or transaction beyond the deal with AMCON on the Keystone Bank transaction, a development which further cast a cloud of doubt on the process.

    Stakeholders cry foul

    Among the stakeholders that have raised their voices above the din over the controversial sale of Keystone Bank are the different shareholder groups.

    In an interview with our correspondent, Sir Sunny Nwosu, National Coordinator, Independent Shareholders Association of Nigeria (ISAN), said the problem of the nationalised bank was caused by the government agencies including the Central Bank of Nigeria and Nigeria Deposit Insurance Commission.

    Raising some posers, Nwosu queried why the CBN decided to disobey court rule over the planned sale of the bank in the first place rather than allowing the law to take its course.

    “How can they sell BankPHB for N25billion? Who are those behind it, what is the value of the bank with over 150 branches? The size of their head office alone is worth a lot and you sell all that for just N25 billion?”he queried.

    Echoing similar sentiments, Chairman, Progressive Shareholders Association of Nigeria, PSAN, Mr. Boniface Okezie alleged that the controversial sale of the Keystone Bank was at a huge loss to shareholders and investors alike.

    AMCON, he stressed, has a lot of questions to answer concerning the way and manner it disposed the bank.

    In the view of Opeyemi Adebayo, a financial analyst, the latest sale like the previous ones would definitely serve as a litmus test for AMCON as far as transparency is concerned.

    However, unlike the trio of Nwosu, Okezie and Adebayo, David Adonri an economist and stockbroker would rather err on the side of caution.

    According to him, judging by the caliber of those who undertook the sale, it is almost certain that the right presumptions were followed.

    “Because the bank was not listed in the stock market, we can’t say it had appropriate market price per share and so the seller must have used other valuation like net asset value and arrive at what it think is the worth of the bank and also add good will and so on to offer it at that price. But I think that amount is not a bad amount. Don’t forget that the bank almost collapsed before federal government rescued it.”

    Also commenting on the deal, Sola Oni, a chartered stockbroker and Chief Executive Officer, SOFUNIX Investment and Communications Limited said, “The sale of Keystone Bank was not a sudden flight. It must have undergone a structured regulatory approval including the capital market regulators. The complaint is a function of who is talking, quality of complaint and appropriateness in terms of timing. We expect a major turnaround of Keystone soon. The involvement of AMCON is a rescue mission. The new buyers have considered the risk and return trade-off before taking over the bank.”

    Like Oni, Chidi Agbapu, Co-CEO/Managing Director, Planet Capital Limited, said the whole argument over the undervaluation of the assets of Keystone Bank is uncalled for.

    “Before you say something is under price or overprice relative to what value, the only person who is in a position to say is over price or underpriced is the person who has look through the asset, liability of profile the institution in question. I can’t volunteer and inform opinion that we be guess work. I want to believe that those who handled this transaction hired expert and professionals to do the work.”

    Mr. Emeka Madubuike, the immediate past chairman of Association of Stock Broking House of Nigeria (ASBHN) however offered a more dispassionate view of the bank’s status.

    While noting that there is need to look at the value of the business itself before making any categorical statement about the propriety or otherwise of the due diligence analysis, Madubuike emphasised that: “You need to look at their books before you say the value was under-priced because as at the time the bank was being managed by AMCON it had no value and the shareholders’ fund was negative.”

    AMCON’s plausible explanation

    However, in a statement, AMCON stated that the consortium of Sigma Golf Nigeria Limited and Riverbank Investment Resources were made of local investors. Specifically, AMCON said the emergence of the Sigma Golf-Riverbank Consortium resulted from a rigorous and competitive bidding process, which was coordinated for AMCON by Citibank Nigeria Limited, its affiliates and FBN Capital (joint financial advisers), and Banwo & Ighodalo, and Crosswrock Law (joint legal advisers).

    Sigma Golf Nigeria Limited and Riverbank Investment Resources, the Corporation empahsised, were entities set up by local investors, adding that the process for the sale of the bank started with interest shown by 18 parties cutting across local and international investors.

    Speaking in an interview with The Nation AMCON’s Head of Corporate Communication, Jude Nwauzor refuted claims that the sale of the bank had underhand deal of any sorts as being suggested in some quarters.

    “It was Citibank that handled the transaction and if you know the pedigree of the bank, I think the world should believe it because they are very outstanding and straight forward. If they sold the bank at that amount that is the value the bank is, it was a very transparent transaction.”

    On the details of the bank’s assets and liabilities, the AMCON spokesperson said the Corporation has no such records at its disposal. “We don’t have that. That information should be with CBN because they are the ones who monitor the books of the bank. We don’t, we only concentrate on bad loans we bought.”

    While explaining the modus operandi adopted by the national debts undertaker, Nwauzor said most of the sales are done with the sole objective of recouping funds expended on the acquisition of such concerns.

    “Before we take over any business our target is to recover our money first. But the case of the bridge banks was different. They were handed over to an interim management under AMCON to stabilise them before sale. This is what we did in the case of Enterprise Bank, sold to Heritage Bank as well as Mainstreet Bank which was sold to SkyeBank. Keystone Bank happened to be the last of the bridge banks disposed off. With this we have realised our money. These things were published both in the local and international newspapers for investors and buyers who showed interest and it was those who met the criteria that got it at the end.”

  • Keystone Bank gets new MD

    Keystone Bank gets new MD

    The management of Keystone Bank Limited has appointed Hafiz Bakare as the bank’s Acting Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer.

    The new appointment followed the successful conclusion of the divestment of the bank by the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), which culminated in the Completion Meeting of  March 23 and the formal handover of the Bank to the Sigma Golf-Riverbank Consortium.

    Also appointed is Alhaji Umaru H. Modibbo   as the bank’s Board Chairman. Others are Mrs. YvonneIsichei   – Executive Director; Mrs. TitilayoTairat Adebiyi  – Non-Executive Director and  BulusBunken Dan-Habu – Non-Executive Director.

    The transitional governance arrangement which will take effect from  April 1, 2017 is subject to approval by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

    By March 31, the current Board of the Bank (including the MD/CEO, Mr. Philip Ikeazor) would have fully disengaged, except for Mr. Bakare and Mrs. Isichei, who will continue as part of the transitional board.

  • New investors take over Keystone Bank

    New investors take over Keystone Bank

    The new owners of Keystone Bank Limited at the weekend took over possession of the entity from the Asset Management Corporation (AMCON).

    The new investors, Sigma Golf-Riverbank consortium said they were set to reposition the bank on a path of growth.

    The Asset Management Corporation (AMCON) last Tuesday announced the consortium as new owners of the bank

    The Completion Meeting according to a statement from Keystone Bank, was held last Thursdaywith representatives of Sigma Golf-Riverbank consortium (the Buyer), AMCON (the Seller), Board and Management of Keystone Bank, and the advisers to the Buyer (KPMG Professional Services, Boston Advisory Services, Giwa Osagie & Co., Pan-African Capital Limited) and the Seller (FBN Capital Limited, Citibank Nigeria Limited, Banwo & Ighodalo, CrosswrockLaw).

    The Completion Meeting signified the effective hand-over of the bank to the buyer and the commencement of a transition process that will culminate in the reconstitution of the board and management of the bank to reflect the new ownership.

    Keystone Bank was taken over by AMCON in 2011 and has been managed by the AMCON-appointed Board and Management that stabilised the bank over the years to make it attractive as a potential target for eventual acquisition by the new investors, who emerged as preferred bidders after a very transparent and competitive bidding process.

  • Alleged N125b fraud: EFCC re-arraigns Keystone Bank ex-MD

    Alleged N125b fraud: EFCC re-arraigns Keystone Bank ex-MD

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday re-arraigned former Managing Director of Bank PHB (now Keystone Bank), Mr Francis Atuche at the Federal High Court in Lagos.

    He was charged along with a former defunct Spring Bank Plc Managing Director, Mr. Charles Ojo on an amended 45-count charge bordering on alleged N125 billion fraud.

    The re-arraignment was caused by the transfer of Justice Saliu Saidu to another division after the trial had commenced.

    The case will begin afresh for the fifth time before Justice A. Faji.

    Atuche and Ojo have been standing trial since 2009 over allegations of acquiring Keystone Bank’s shares using depositors’ funds.

    They pleaded not guilty to the 45 counts of conspiracy, reckless granting and approval of loans and money laundering, between September 1, 2006, and 2009.

    Atuche was also accused of applying N3.5billion being proceeds of unlawful loans granted to Tradjek Nigeria Limited, a subsidiary of Futureview Financial Services Ltd, in payment for his acquisition of shares of Bank PHB using various companies as fronts with an intention to conceal the ownership of the loans.

    Atuche
    Atuche

    EFCC said he collaborated with different companies to conceal the genuine origins of the N3.5billion used to acquire the bank’s shares.

    The alleged offences, all of which Atuche denied, contravene Section 14(1) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act and Section 516 of the Criminal Code Act Cap 38, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.

    Reckless granting of loans contravene Section 7(1) (b) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act and punishable under section 7(2)(b).

    The defendants pleaded not guilty.

    Ojo’s lawyer, Mr Osahon Idemudia, urged Justice Faji to allow the defendants continue on the bail terms granted them on November 9, 2009, by Justice Akinjide Ajakaiye, before whom they were first arraigned.

    Justice Faji granted the prayer, holding that the defendants shall continue on the N50million bail with one responsible surety each.

    The surety, he said, must deposit the Certificate of Occupancy of his landed property either in Ikoyi or Victoria Island.

    Justice Faji, however, said the sureties must update their tax clearance within 14 days.

    He adjourned till February 23, March 16 and 17 for trial.

    [news_list display=”tag” tag=”Trial” count=”6″ show_more=”on”]

  • Reps urge EFCC to investigate ‘movement’ of N4bn from Keystone Bank

    The House of Representatives on Monday urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to commence investigation into an alleged illegal movement of N4 billion from Industrial Trust Fund’s (ITF) account domiciled in Keystone Bank.

    The Vice Chairman, Public Accounts Committee, House of Representatives, Ibrahim Baba, made the call following a query issued by the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation, the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports.

    According to the query dated December 2010, a total sum of N4.2 billion was illegally moved three times in November from ITF account to other accounts, all belonging to same agency.

    The OAGF questioned the propriety of moving the money without remitting N23.5 million interest accruing from the transactions to the agency’s account.

    It also sought to ascertain who authorised the transactions and for what purpose.

    Responding to the query, the Director-General and Executive Chai ITF, Mr. Joseph Ari, said the transactions were made without the authorisation of the agency.

    Ari said the bank in its response to the query in May 2012 said the withdrawal from ITF’s remital control account was done in error.

    According to Ari, Keystone’s position was that it was a wrong posting but was later corrected.

    “However within the days the money was moved, ITF wrote Keystone Bank to remit the interest to the account accordingly but the bank didn’t reply.

    “We reported the matter to the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the CBN advised that parties should sit down and discuss the matter.

    “However, we sat down with keystone officials without finding solution,’’ Ari said.

  • Keystone Bank Sierra Leone wins two awards

    Keystone Bank Sierra Leone Limited, a subsidiary of Keystone Bank Nigeria Limited, won two awards at the inaugural edition of the Sierra Leone Council of Chief Executives Awards held at the Bintumani Conference Hall in Sierra Leone.

    While Keystone Bank Sierra Leone won the award for Best Bank for 2016, its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Ime Okon, according to a statement from the lender, won Best Foreign CEO of the year.

    Receiving both awards from the organisers, CEO Mr. Ime Okon said: “Our products have given us strength and they cut across from school children to the market women to the institutions and businesses. We are not finished yet as we will be launching more products in the market very soon as we hope to broaden our horizon and make Keystone Bank a leader in Sierra Leone.”

  • Keystone Bank Sierra Leone wins two awards

    Keystone Bank Sierra Leone wins two awards

    Keystone Bank Sierra Leone Limited, a subsidiary of Keystone Bank Nigeria Limited, won two awards at the inaugural edition of the Sierra Leone Council of Chief Executives Awards held at the Bintumani Conference Hall in Sierra Leone.

    While Keystone Bank Sierra Leone won the award for Best Bank for 2016, its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Ime Okon, according to a statement from the lender, won Best Foreign CEO of the year.

    Receiving both awards from the organisers, CEO Mr. Ime Okon said, “Our products have given us strength and they cut across from school children to the market women to the institutions and businesses. We are not finished yet as we will be launching more products in the market very soon as we hope to broaden our horizon and make Keystone Bank a leader in Sierra Leone.”

    Okon noted that Keystone Bank was the last to come to Sierra Leone but the strides the lender has made has catapulted the institution to the top. He said: “This rise to the top saw us win such a meritorious award from a high profile organisation like the Sierra Leone Council of Chief Executives.”

     

  • Keystone Bank’s ex-MD must face trial, says Appeal Court

    Keystone Bank’s ex-MD must face trial, says Appeal Court

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, yesterday held that former Keystone Bank (former Bank PHB) Managing Director Francis Atuche must face trial for alleged N25.7b theft.

    The court upheld the appeal filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against a Lagos High Court verdict which dismissed the charge.

    Last June 22, Justice Lateef Lawal-Akapo ruled that he lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit and that the prosecution’s case lacked merit.

    He discharged Atuche of the theft charge along with his wife, Elizabeth, and a former Chief Financial Officer of the bank, Ugo Anyanwu.

    But the appellate court in its judgement delivered by Justice Gana Mshelia, set aside the judgment.

    She ordered the Chief Judge of Lagos State to reasign the case to another judge or retrial.

    Justice Msheila in her lead judgement held that the trial judge erred in law by holding that it was bound on the principle of stare decisis by the decision in Okey Nwosu Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria and Akingbola Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    The appellate court further held that  the lower court erred when it struck out counts 1 to 24 and 26 in the amended information against the third defendant.

    Justice Lawal-Akapo had held “I find no merit in the prosecution’s application, it is hereby dismissed. The defendants application dated November 27, 2013 succeeds and I hereby make the following orders:

    “The criminal charge in this suit is hereby struck out and the accused persons namely; Francis Atuche, Elizabeth Atuche and Ugo Anyawu are discharged. The complainant’s notice of plenary objection dated December 3, 2013 is hereby dismissed”, Justice Lawal-Akapo had declared.

    But the EFCC in its appeal filed by its counsel, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN), is now seeking an order of the Court of Appeal setting aside the order of Justice Lawal-Akapo striking out the counts contained in the amended information dated June 1, 2011.

    Other reliefs sought by the EFCC include an order allowing its appeal and an order directing a continuation of trial and defence before Justice Lateefa Okunnu of the High Court of Lagos State sitting in Ikeja.

    The EFCC, which based its appeal on five grounds, told the court that the learned trial judge erred in law by proceeding to strike out the entirety of the amended information when by the unambiguous and plain provisions of Section 252(3) of the Constitution, no exclusive criminal jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal High Court (at least to the exclusion of the Lagos High Court) on the matters provided for under Section 251(1).

    The commission contended that it was wrong for the court to strike out counts 1 to 24 and 26 in the amended information against the third defendant when the order of the Court of Appeal against which he claimed the lower court assumed jurisdiction over the charge was in respect of the appeals initiated by the first and second appellants only stressing that the third defendant was not a party to it.

    He said neither the third defendant nor his counsel made any application before the court seeking to have counts 1 to 24 and 26 of the amended information struck out. He said the court, by so doing, has become charitable by granting relief and order not sought for by the third defendant.

    The EFCC submitted that the defendants pleaded separately each of the counts contained in the amended information to the main suit.

    It explained that counts one to 10 dealt with the alleged stealing of money belonging to the bank while count 11 to 27 dealt with the allegation of conversion of the monies to personal use.

    It said the court ignored the provisions of Section 152 and 153 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law 2011 by striking out all the counts against the defendants.

    The EFCC contended that the trial judge erred in law by holding that it was bound on the principle of stare decisis by the decision in Okey Nwosu Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria and Akingbola Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    It said the decision of the Court of Appeal in Ehindero Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria and Sebastian Adigwe Vs Federal Republic of Nigeria affirmed the non-exclusivity of the criminal jurisdiction of the Federal High Court.

    The EFCC contended that where there are two or more conflicting decisions of a higher court or the Court of Appeal, the law stipulated that the lower court is at liberty and free to choose which of the decisions to follow and cited the cases of Eze Vs Attorney General Rivers State, Ikweki Vs Ebele and Mohammed Vs MECO Limited to support his claim.

    The commission said the lower court was wrong to hold that it was bound by the decisions of the upper court in the cases of Okey Nwosu and Akingbola and to declare that the cases were similar and applicable to the instant case.