The Nation Newspaper

Tag: Kwam 1

  • Awujale stool: KWAM 1 threatens court action again over nomination exercise

    Awujale stool: KWAM 1 threatens court action again over nomination exercise

    Alhaji Wasiu Ayinde a.k.a. KWAM 1 has asked the Ogun State Government to declare the  nomination exercise conducted by the Fusengbuwa Ruling House on January 12, 2026 null and void owing to claims of fundamental breaches of statutory provisions, constitutional rights and principles of natural justice.

    Wasiu Ayimde said he would seek redress in the court again should urgent and appropriate steps not be taken by the Executive Council of Ogun State Government to address his grievances within a reasonable time, stressing that he “reserves the unequivocal right to seek redress before competent courts of law and other appropriate authorities without further recourse or notice.”

    The Fuji musician made this demand in another petition dated January 15, 2026, signed by his legal counsel, Dr. Wahab Shittu (SAN) and copied to the Ogun State Governor, Prince Dapo Abiodun, the Commissioner for Chieftaincy Affairs, Attorney General of Ogun State, the Kingmakers, Secretary of Ijebu-ode Local Government and the Fusengbuwa Ruling House of Ijebu Ode

    He asked the government to declare null and void the purported nomination exercise conducted by the Fusengbuwa Ruling House on January 12, 2026, alleging fundamental breaches of statutory provisions, constitutional rights, and principles of natural justice.

    He asked the Ogun State Government to order conduct of fresh nomination that would include him and all other eligible members of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House, in strict compliance with the provisions of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, the Awujale of Ijebuland Chieftaincy Declaration, and the principles of natural justice in all further stages of the selection process.

    He said the nomination exercise conducted on January 12, 2026 without his participation and that of the full and free participation of all eligible members of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House is procedurally defective, unlawful and consequently null and void, adding that any outcome from such a flawed process cannot stand and will inevitably lead to protracted litigation.

    He described as unlawful the imposition of a “delegate” system and the physical exclusion of members by a faction within the ruling house constitute an arbitrary and ultra vires exercise of authority, undermining the statutory duties of the ruling house to conduct an open and transparent nomination.

    READ ALSO: How to budget for 2026

    “The deliberate exclusion of our client and other members from the nomination meeting is a blatant violation of their fundamental constitutional right to fair hearing, as guaranteed by Section 36(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended). This right applies to the determination of civil rights and obligations, including chieftaincy matters.

    “The principle of audi alteram partem (hear the other side) is a cornerstone of natural justice, dictating that no person shall be condemned unheard. The Supreme Court has consistently held that decisions made without affording a party the opportunity to be heard are null and void, irrespective of whether such a provision is explicitly stated in a statute. In Kotoye v. Central Bank of Nigeria.”

     Shittu, in the petition claimed that his client and other eligible members of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House were deliberately excluded and prevented from entering.

    According to him, “heavily armed security personnel, including the Nigerian Police and other security operatives, were reportedly stationed at the venue and were used to disenfranchise legitimate members.

    “Entry to the meeting was restricted by the issuance of special entry cards, purportedly to “delegates” selected by a faction within the ruling house.

    “This system of “delegates” was unilaterally introduced and was never agreed upon by our client or other disenfranchised members, who maintain their right to attend and participate directly in the statutory meeting of the Ruling House.

    “This deliberate obstruction prevented our client and others from exercising their fundamental right to participate in the nomination process for the Awujale stool.

    “Please find attached herewith a flash-drive detailing some of the atrocities/violations that occurred in the course of the referred meeting where our client and some of the accredited members of the family were denied entry into the venue of the statutory meeting.”

    The petition stated that the actions of the leadership of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House, in collaboration with security forces, constitute a clear contravention of established legal principles and statutory provisions governing chieftaincy affairs in Ogun State, as well as fundamental human rights.

  • Court dismisses KWAM 1’s application to halt selection process for next Awujale

    Court dismisses KWAM 1’s application to halt selection process for next Awujale

    An Ogun State High Court sitting in Ijebu-Ode, yesterday dismissed an application filed by Fuji musician, Otunba Wasiu Olasunkanmi Ayinde, popularly called KWAM 1, seeking to stop the selection process of the next Awujale.

    Recalled that Ayinde, who is from Fidipote Ruling House, had approached the court to challenge the committee in charge of the installation process of the new Awujale on why only Fusengbuwa Ruling House should produce the next Awujale.

    The Fuji musician had filed a suit against Ogun State Governor, Dapo Abiodun, and the Chairman of Fusengbuwa Ruling House, Otunba Lateef Owoyemi, at the State High Court sitting in Ijebu-Ode, from proceeding with the process pending the outcome of his lawsuit.

    Other respondents in a suit number: HC3/238/2025 include: the Executive Chairman of Ijebu-Ode Local Government, Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, and Secretary to Ijebu-Ode Local Government, the Chairman Awujale Interregnum Administrative Council.

    But, the court, led by Justice A. A. Omoniyi, ruled that the application lacked merit and refused to grant an interim injunction to halt the selection process for the next Awujale.

    Read Also: APC confirms Plateau Gov Mutfwang’s defection from PDP

    Ayinde’ s lawsuit alleges that the Awujale succession process breaches Ogun State Chieftaincy Law and violates his constitutional rights.

    However, in a swift move, the state government cancelled the ongoing Awujale selection process a few days after the court challenge.

    Vice Chairman of Fusengbuwa Ruling House, Prof. Fassy Yusuf, confirmed the government’s decision to restart the process, citing procedural errors that could spark further litigation.

    “The government wants strictly adherence to the provisions of the Obas and Chiefs Law regarding the installation of the Awujale,” Yusuf said.

  • Fusengbuwa ruling house disowns KWAM 1, says Fuji star not eligible for Awujale throne

    Fusengbuwa ruling house disowns KWAM 1, says Fuji star not eligible for Awujale throne

    The Fusengbuwa Ruling House of Ijebu-Ode, on Thursday, officially disowned Fuji music icon and Olori Omooba of Ijebuland, Otunba Wasiu Ayinde, KWAM 1, stating that he is not a member of the royal family.

    The Fusengbuwa Ruling House is next in line to produce the Awujale of Ijebuland following the demise of the late Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona on July 13, 2025, who reigned for over 65 years and passed at the age of 90.

    KWAM 1 had on Tuesday submitted a letter to the head of the Fusengbuwa, expressing his intention to contest for the Awujale stool, claiming his legitimacy through the Jadiara unit of the ruling house.

    However, it was gathered that the Fuji star is actually from the Fidipote ruling house, according to a letter signed by the late Oba Adetona when he conferred on him the chieftaincy title of Olori Omooba of Ijebuland.

    KWAM 1’s submission has sparked mixed reactions among Ijebuland princes and princesses, with many questioning how a member of the Fidipote house could contest a stool meant for Fusengbuwa princes.

    The Jadiara unit subsequently wrote a petition to the Fusengbuwa chairman and the Ogun State Government, asserting that KWAM 1 is not part of their family.

    Addressing journalists at Agunsenbi Ule Nla, the seat of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House, spokesperson of the Fusengbuwa nomination committee, Omoba Abiodun Adesanya Ogidan, reiterated that Wasiu Ayinde is “not our family member.”

    He explained that an investigation into family history, as well as consultations with all units of the ruling house, including Jadiara, confirmed that KWAM 1 is neither a Jadiara nor has his lineage endorsed by the Olori-Ebi of the unit he claimed.

    Read Also: Why I’m qualified to become Awujale, by KWAM1

    Omoba Ogidan stressed that the Fusengbuwa Ruling House will not admit non-family members, warning that doing so would amount to introducing “fake people” into the lineage.

    He added that history cannot be rewritten to include outsiders.

    He also clarified that the collection and submission of the official nomination forms had closed, adding that what KWAM 1 submitted was a family lineage form, not a nomination for the Awujale stool.

    The names of the nominated princes and princesses are scheduled to be announced on December 15, 2025, at Bisrod Hall, GRA Ijebu-Ode, in line with the established guidelines.

  • Nigeria and the rump of the aviation industry

    Nigeria and the rump of the aviation industry

    • By Mike Kebonkwu

    Two seemingly ugly incidents occurred recently in our aviation industry that drew negative press and publicity, both avoidable.  One involved a celebrity, an fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde Marshal (aka KWAM 1) who was involved in a bitter altercation while trying to board ValueJet flight at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.  He had refused to submit for examination, the content of a vacuum flask he was holding like a totem in a primitive display of power and influence as a celebrity of sort.  He was going to block the flight like King Kong to stop it from taking off which could have led to fatality.  The bad tempered pilot of the aircraft also taxied off without caring a hoot about the consequences.   The pilot had her operating licence suspended. 

    The minister of aviation also in swift reaction slammed the musician with six months flying ban.  No investigation, no official inquiry, nothing!  Is that what the law or rule says?  One wonders where the minister got the power which was quite impulsive and arbitrary deployment of official power. Everything appears to be wrong with the aviation industry in Nigeria!

    What about the arbitrary and prohibitive fare Nigerian passengers are sentenced to?  Nigeria should command the hub of aviation traffic in the industry as people have been driven out of the roads by insecurity.  However, it is beyond the reach of the poor masses that have to face bandits and kidnappers daily on the road and pay heavy price for that also.

    Lo and behold, we hear that Kwam 1 has been rewarded as brand ambassador of the aviation industry. Can you beat that, for someone whose action is synonymous with lawlessness to wear the face of the aviation industry security protocol that he defied and denigrated!  Typical elite reward system; a despicable denigration of public decency and rule of etiquette. 

    We are not to wait for long before the sister case was re-enacted at the Ibom Air, this time in the cabin while landing at the Lagos airport.    

    It involved a relatively unknown passenger, a certain Comfort Emmanson who had disagreement with a hostess over turning off phone.  It was a most uncultured display of incivility and lack of professionalism of the cabin crew in handling the whole business.  There was questionable behaviour of the passenger which did not show much of proper upbringing.  She was almost stripped to her panties.  Such treatment was inexcusable and should be deprecated with odium.  She was wheeled straight to Kirikiri correctional facility in Lagos with a procured order from a magistrate.  Again, she has since landed brand endorsement to many companies earning immediate celebrity status and mega bucks.   

    To be sure, these are not just two isolated incidents of such ugly character.   Not too long ago, a senator and two time governor of Edo State and former labour leader was embroiled in a similar incident over an alleged late arrival, after boarding had closed. 

    Read Also: Fake postinor-2 hits market, NAFDAC warns

    The problem is not exactly about law and order or respect for operational rules of airlines for safety of passengers; it is a little bit of all and especially about the moral bankruptcy of the society.  A responsible person and a gentleman ought to have respect for time and schedule.  You are not to keep people waiting because you have political power or that you are rich.  You need not patronize public utility as you can as well use your private jet where no one will be inconvenienced by your sense of entitlement with no respect for time. 

    The incidents in the aviation industry are part of the larger societal problem. The airlines are guilty, the regulators are guilty, the passengers are equally guilty and our country is carrying the moral burden like the mark of the beast. 

    What is the standard and operating procedure for airline passengers on sitting arrangement, safety and use of cell phones in-flight?  The airlines themselves often time display acute lack of order when they will issue you boarding pass with seat number and only to be told in the cabin that it is free sitting.  Then why issue boarding pass with seat number?  On regulation of using cell phone, what is the permissible rule; put it on flight mode or switch it off for the duration of the flight?  It is certainly not too much for one to put off his or her phone for a flight that is just about one hour. People just want to attract unnecessary attention to the phone they are using to show off, but who really cares, pressing phone! 

    The airlineswill do well to give the cabin crew adequate training to relate nicely with passengers.  It has become the case of take the monkey from the bush but you cannot take the bush away from the monkey!  The street rule and the rule of airline passengers certainly cannot be the same and do not meet. 

     The treatment meted on Ms Comfort in the cabin on the aircraft was everything but professional.  This however did not make up for the obvious character deficit and lack of good manners clearly displayed by her. The situation could have been better managed than what was beamed to the world on social media. However, there was a good lesson also in the whole ugly drama; if only to serve as bad example on how not to behave in public and how not to manage social misfits in public space.   

    All the lawyers in Nigeria may choose to file actions in court on behalf of Ms Emmanson; all the gender rights activists may choose to wear orange vests in protest but the moral compass of public decency cannot absolve Emmanson as a victim.  Her endorsements as brand ambassador are nothing but celebration of mediocrity, elites’ perversion, and moral bankruptcy of the society.

    The reaction of people was almost with unanimity in condemnation at the exposed boobs of the damsel whose apparel was torn in a fit of rage in public altercation and being dragged from an aircraft.  That is the society we are living in; everything is in topsy-turvy.  These incidents show the face of Nigeria to the public; no standard, no rules, brash and rascality pays and we celebrate moral bankruptcy.  The government rewarded KWAM1 while the public celebrate Ms Comfort with endorsement and as brand ambassador. The airline has to sulk in badly trained staff and public scrutiny while the industry is worse off!  Bad manners pay?

    •Kebonkwu Esq is an Abuja-based attorney. He writes via mikekebonkwu@yahoo.com

  • KWAM 1’s second chance

    KWAM 1’s second chance

    Prominent Nigerian musician King Wasiu Ayinde Marshal (KWAM 1), who is otherwise called K1 De Ultimate, and whose father’s name is Anífowóse, has just had a confounding near-death experience, and it has made many to be repeating a question from one of KWAM 1’s lyrics. The question is “Irú kí lèyí, omo Anífowóse?” (‘What’s this for goodness sake, Son of Anífowóse?’) In its current context, this rhetorical question wonders, rather sarcastically, how KWAM 1 could have deliberately put himself in a life-threatening situation.

    According to reports, KWAM 1 had wanted to board a ValueJet commercial flight from the local wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe Airport, Abuja, to Lagos on 5 August, 2025, but had a flask with him in which was a liquid substance. He was told that he could not board with the liquid substance in keeping with a well-publicised aviation safety regulation. He was said to have refused to obey the directive, in spite of the intervention of the lead pilot of the plane, Captain Oluranti Ogunwale-Ogoyi.

    It was further reported that in anger, he willfully spilt the liquid substance on Captain Oluranti and some other people. While some believed that what was spilt from the flask was alcohol, KWAM 1 claims that it was water. Reports also had it that because the head pilot could not persuade him not to board without the liquid in the flask, she returned to the cockpit. Once the boarding of the other passengers was concluded, the plane’s door was shut.

    Reports further said that in order to stop the plane from moving without him on board, KWAM 1 stood in front of the aircraft. From some of the videos of the incident trending on social media, the pilot moved slightly to make the readiness to commence the flight unmistakable, but KWAM 1 was unfazed. So, the plane stopped; and she revved the engine; and the plane started taxing in earnest.

    At this point, KWAM 1 left the front of the plane, but was now quite dangerously in the line of the wing of the moving plane. Then he bent dramatically, and escaped being hit or killed by the wing. It is this scenario that has given KWAM 1’s rhetorical question “Irú kí lèyí, omo Anífowóse?” its new resonance, and all sorts of comic contents have been created around KWAM 1’s near-death experience.

    For example, his own caustic humour was redirected at him with respect to a Yoruba expression he had created or popularised. The expression, ‘ganusi’, literally means ‘to set one’s mouth’ in readiness for free or undeserved food or money. He had used the word to denigrate some Muslim priests who, when the funeral ceremonies of his mother were being conducted, had come to him in his personal house rather than go to his father’s house where the main activities were taking place. 

    The expression became instantly popular, and means going where you’re not expected or invited, in anticipation of a favour, or pressurising somebody for something. Now that KWAM 1 has done the unthinkable by standing in front of a plane to prevent it from moving, he has become the object of the humorous use of his own expression ‘ganusi’. As one humourist put it, “Wasiu ganu si bàlú” (‘Wasiu stood suicidally in front of a plane.’)

    The KWAM 1 episode came with other interesting optics, including Oluranti’s widely-circulating iconic photograph. In her immaculate white shirt, with her slightly tilted right shoulder showing clearly that she was a four-striped pilot, it was unmistakable that she was a Captain. In aviation parlance, a Captain is more explicitly called Pilot in Command (PIC), whose ‘word is law’ as far as the plane she is flying or about to fly is concerned.

    In fact, an informational on https://www.law.cornell.edu states: “The Pilot in Command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of the aircraft.” The Australasian Legal Information Institute hosted by University of Technology Sydney Faculty of Law also states: “The PIC has the authority to remove or restrain individuals on board who pose threat to safety.” Even a simple Google search on the subject reveals: “The Pilot in Command has the ultimate authority on board and can refuse boarding to any passenger deemed a safety risk.”  Did K1 De Ultimate know that Captain Oluranti was The Ultimate authority on that ValueJet flight?

    To be clear, regarding unruly or disruptive passengers, SKYbrary states: “Annex 17 to the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) Chicago Convention (Convention on International Civil Aviation Security Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference) defines a disruptive passenger as: ‘A passenger who fails to respect the rules of conduct at an airport or on board an aircraft or to follow the instructions of the airport staff or crew members and thereby disturbs the good order and discipline at an airport or on board the aircraft.’”

    The KWAM 1/Oluranti scenario reminds one of the following lyrics by the popular Yoruba female musician, Salawa Abeni: “Gentle lady ni mí, èmi kì se fighter o. Kènikéni má tì mí lo síbi ìjà.” (‘I’m a gentle lady. I’m not a fighter. Let no one draw me into a fight.’) In his regard, Oluranti seems to have followed William Shakespeare’s counsel in his play Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 3: “Beware of entrance to a quarrel; but, being in, Bear’t that the opposed may beware of thee.” That is, avoid getting into a quarrel as much as you can; but once a quarrel has been forced on you, fight in such a way that your opponent becomes scared of you. 

    Another language-related point about the plane-stopping episode is that Wasiu Ayinde is a ‘Marshal’, and Air Marshals are charged with preventing or dealing with violent acts on planes. Ironically, it was Ayinde Marshal himself who was prevented from boarding the ValueJet plane to stop him from compromising security and safety. 

    The first name of the ValueJet Captain is also noteworthy. She is Olúrántí (‘God remembered’), and the shortened form of the Yoruba name is Rántí (‘Remember’). In her 5 August, 2025 response to passenger unruliness, she has given KWAM 1 and Nigerians at large something to remember for a very long time to come. In one comic skit, she was named “Pilot Kògbérégbè” (‘Pilot No Nonsense’).

    KWAM 1 refused to take instructions from Oluranti, but he was forced to ‘bow’ to the wing of her plane. This image has also been a source of morbid humour, and KWAM 1 has been called “Aríkúyerí” (‘One who bows to escape death’). Moreover, Portable, the irreverent popular Yoruba musician sang sarcastically, in his new single titled “Plane Stopper”: “Ìbèrè mo wà. Ìbèrè mo wà. Ikú rékojá, ìbèrè mo wà” (‘I’m in a bending position. I’m in a bending position. Death flew over me. I’m in a bending position.’) On 9 August, 2025, one humourist called KWAM 1 “The No.1 Plane Bender in Nigeria.”

    Read Also: Kwam 1 and the dangerous cost of pride

    Moreover, one of the lyrics of the late Yoruba apala music star, Ayinla Omowura, is “Òré, b’ó sògùn òwò, jòwó má se dúro dè mótò” (‘My friend, if you’ve fortified yourself with a touch-me-not, danger-repelling magical charm, don’t stand in the way of a moving vehicle.’) If Ayinla had been alive today and witnessed KWAM 1’s ValueJet action, maybe Omowura would have revised the song to “Òré, b’ó sògùn òwò, jòwó má se dúro d’aropúlènì” (‘My friend, if you’ve fortified yourself with a touch-me-not, danger-repelling magical charm, don’t stand in the way of a moving plane.’)

    A new word has also come into Nigerian English courtesy of KWAM 1’s 5 August airport show. As pointed out on the TVC News programme “Your View” of 11 August, 2025, the word is ‘kwamish’. Ms. Morayo Afolabi-Brown noted with respect to this word: “kwamish behaviour … is [the disagreeable conduct of] passengers … when there’s an altercation between them and flight attendants or airport officials.” An adjective, the novel word also means ‘self-endangering’.

    Additionally, when an Ibom Air passenger, Comfort Emmanson, was alleged to have become unruly and violent on board and she had to be physically removed, and bundled into a waiting airport bus by aviation security on 10 August, 2025, she was referred to as “KWAM 2”. Indeed, one writer referred to other potential disruptive or unruly air passengers as “KWAMS”.

    Since KWAM 1 has been President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s bard, detractors have been holding him vicariously responsible for KWAM 1’s audacity and indiscretion. This is in spite of the President’s demonstration of intolerance of clearly disagreeable conduct from anybody – family, friend or foe.

    On 8 August, 2025, KWAM 1 tender this apology : “… I take full responsibility for all [the] incidents. Once again, I seek forgiveness from Mr. President, the Commander-in-Chief of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, who’s also my father and father of the nation, the Honourable Minister for Aviation, the pilot, the airline, the airline staff, passengers, and above all, my fans across the globe, my family, for the incident. … Please accept my apology.”

    In a press statement on 13 August, 2025, the Honourable Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, SAN, said: “In the case of KWAM 1, the NCAA is to reduce his flight ban to a one-month period. FAAN will also work with the music star with a view to engaging him as an ambassador for proper airport security protocol going forward. … Having publicly demonstrated penitence, the NCAA is also to withdraw its criminal complaints against KWAM 1 earlier lodged with the Police.”

    The Minister continued: “In the case of Captain Oluranti Ogoyi, and the co-pilot, First Officer Ivan Oloba of VALUEJET, the NCAA is to restore their licenses after the same period of one-month ban after undergoing some mandatory professional re-appraisal.” As further acts of clemency inspired by the Minister, the court case instituted against Comfort Emmanson has been withdrawn unconditionally by the plaintiffs and dismissed by the court; and she has been freed from detention.  

    Today’s Wasiu is inescapably different from the pre-5-August-2025 Oluranti-encountered KWAM 1. In his very sober moments, he would, most likely, be having nightmares or shuddering flashbacks of the incident. Fortunately, he got the divine second chance of missing death by a whisker. He also got the ministerial second chance of missing litigation and the possibility of imprisonment if found guilty of disruptive and life-threatening aircraft-related conduct. He should use his double second chance productively.

    KWAM 1 remains a popular brand in the Nigerian music industry, but it’s at present a battered brand. He therefore needs a public relations offensive to attract overriding positive attention. This could entail, for example, instituting a schools debate competition, establishing a broad-based scholarship scheme, initiating a robust entrepreneurial empowerment programme or building a strategically-located multi-purpose community centre.

  • Airport incidents: Pardon for Emmason, Kwam-1

    Airport incidents: Pardon for Emmason, Kwam-1

    • Assault case struck out, ban lifted
    • Fuji musician for community service

    Reprieve came the way of Fuji Musician Wasiu Ayinde (Kwam-1) and Ms Comfort Emmason yesterday.

    They were left off the hooks by the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo.

    Kwam-1 and Ms Emmanson were involved in airport incidents which led to the imposition of sanctions on them, including the remand of  Ms Emmanson at the Kirikiri Correctional Centre in Lagos.

    An Ikeja Magistrates’ Court yesterday discharged Ms Emmason after the prosecution withdrew a charge of assault against her.

    Magistrate Olanrewaju Salami struck out the charge after the police said it would no longer pursue the five-count charge.

    The magistrate admonished Emmanson to exercise wisdom in whatever she does in future.

    “This is because you might not be this fortunate in another matter in future.

    “I hope you will learn from this experience and become a better person,” he said

    The police said Ms. Emmanson (Bob), on August 10, while onboard Ibom Aircraft No. 5N-BXP parked at Murtala Muhammed Airport Terminal Two (MMA2), Ikeja “did behave in an unruly and disorderly manner by shouting on top of your voice, abusing and assaulting the flight crew and refusing to disembark from the aircraft after landing.”

    The charge said she “did assault one Juliana Edward by slapping and hitting her cheeks”, and allegedly assaulted one Jokpame Sagun “by hitting her face with slippers.”

    She was accused of “willfully” damaging the aircraft divider cotton valued at $2,500, and tearing a braided wig valued at N110,000.

    Prosecuting counsel, Inspector Oluwabunmi Adeitan, said she was directed by the Commissioner of Police (CP), Lagos Airport Command, to withdraw the charge unconditionally.

    The magistrate then struck out the charge and discharged the defendant.

    Emmanson, in a post believed to be her Instagram account @soft_commy, wrote: “Thank you so much for all the prayers, love, and support. I’ve been released from Prison, but I’m still in pain due to how I was treated.

    Read Also: IGP orders investigation into KWAM I Airport saga

    “I just need some rest and medical treatment before I give out my own version of the event.

    “Thank you so much, my lovely friends and supporters. I really appreciate y’all from the bottom of my heart. God bless y’all. Thank You, My Great God!!!”

    Already, several fake accounts bearing her name with her photos have surfaced on Instagram as internet fraudsters seek to exploit the situation for their benefit.

    Keyamo: why Emmanson, Kwam-1 were pardoned

    Keyamo, stated earlier in a post on his official X handle that the Airline Operators of Nigeria had lifted the ban placed on Emmanson.

    “When the police took her statement in the presence of her lawyer, she exhibited great remorse for her conduct,” the minister said.

    In the case of KWAM 1, the minister said the Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) will reduce his flight ban to one month.

    The musician, on August 5, was prevented from boarding a ValueJet aircraft with a bottle of liquid, which he said was water, at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.

    His reaction allegedly obstructed the safe operation of the aircraft, in violation of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Regulations, 2023. He later apologised.

    Kwam-1 was seen ducking as the aircraft moved to take off, which led to the suspension of the pilot and co-pilot.

    Keyamo said the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) will work with the music star “with a view to engaging him as an ambassador for proper airport security protocol going forward.”

    The minister said the NCAA is also to withdraw its criminal complaints against KWAM 1.

    For the pilots, he said the NCAA is to restore their licenses after a one-month ban, after undergoing some mandatory professional re-appraisal.

    He noted that the decisions were taken by the government and the airline operators purely on compassionate grounds.

    Keyamo later clarified that Kwam-1 will not be paid, and that his role as an ambassador, which he described as a global practice, is a form of community service.

    A passenger’s account

    A passenger who claimed to have boarded the Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos blamed the airline for mishandling the Emmanson incident.

    The passenger, Mr Ogebe David, who shared a picture of his boarding pass containing his seat number and other details onboard the flight Q1513, dismissed claims that Emmanson refused to switch off her phone before take-off.

    Ogebe’s account of the incident, shared on X through a verified account of Foundational Nupe Lawyer @egi_nupe, painted a vivid picture of what transpired in the aircraft.

    According to the passenger, there were only two air hostesses on the plane, probably because it was a small plane.

    He said: “One of the hostesses approached us and gave us the regular briefing for passengers sitting on the emergency exit. This hostess was exceptionally kind, polite and amiable.

    “After the briefing, she asked Ms. Emmanson politely twice to switch off her phone. I noticed thereafter that Ms. Emmanson was fiddling with her phone with some uncertainty.

    “After hostess 1 left to continue her duties, hostess 2 came with an almighty huff and told Ms Emmanson to switch off her phone in a very high voice.

    “Ms Emmanson, in a low voice, tried to explain to hostess 2 that the buttons on her phone for switch-off were not working, so she did not know how to switch off the phone.

    “Hostess 2 rebuffed her and kept insisting that she switch off the phone. Hostess 2 then told her that the phone she was holding was an iPhone, which did not require buttons to switch off.

    “The lady now asked the hostess to assist her in switching off the phone, and hostess 2 replied: ‘I am not touching your phone’. Hostess 2 now told her to go to settings and from there click on general.”

    “The lady now responded in an even lower voice saying: ‘Please I cannot read and don’t know what you said I should do. Can you just help me?’ Hostess 2 now: ‘Please I don’t have time for your nonsense. Better switch off that phone immediately’.

    “The gentleman sitting to my left in seat 14A and I were flabbergasted when we heard this and could not believe that an air hostess could speak so condescendingly and unnecessarily humiliate a passenger, perhaps because she was a single female.

    “We then intervened and asked the gentleman sitting next to the lady by the window of her row to assist her. He collected the phone and was assisting her.

    “Ms Emmanson then started asking hostess 2 if there was anything wrong with being unable to read and why she had to humiliate her like that to the whole public.

    “Hostess 2 now told Ms Emmanson to keep quiet or else she would deal with her. At this point, Ms Emmanson started cursing and told her she could do nothing to her.

    “Hostess 2 then said: o’Ok, you will see’ then she left in a puff and proceeded to the cockpit and never came back.

    “Some passengers sitting afar who did not know what truly transpired were shouting for Ms Emmanson to switch off her phone.

    “However, the passenger in seat 14A and I rose up stoutly and defended her and when they heard our explanations they all calmed down and the flight took off.”

    Ogebe said while they were airborne, Emmanson was upset and simmering. She kept on discussing the situation with the gentleman on her right till the plane landed. She was obviously quite annoyed.

    “I also noticed that Hostess 2 kept peeping at our row throughout the flight. She stayed upfront in the plane most of the time if I recollect correctly.

    “Hostess 1 on the other hand was completely oblivious of the raging storm (at least I thought so) and was kind, polite and professional throughout.

    “Hostess 1 gave extra water to Ms Emmanson when she asked for it in-flight and also helped her with bringing out and returning her food tray when snacks were served and also as we were approaching landing. Hostess 1 also helped put away some of Ms Emmanson things in the cabin above before landing.”

    Onground in Lagos, Ogebe said disembarkation was done in rows and before it got to their turn, Emmanson moved to the back, probably to use the toilet.

    He narrated how he had joked with his neighbour that they better left the plane before a war broke out but hoped that nothing of such would happen.

    “Disembarkation was being done row by row, and just before it got to our turn, Miss Emmanson exited her seat to the back of the plane and I presumed she went to the toilet.

    “We happily disembarked, and I forgot all about the spat in the plane until I started seeing all the videos and statements flying unabatedly.”

  • Four ‘must-dos and don’ts’ before flight takeoff

    Four ‘must-dos and don’ts’ before flight takeoff

    The Federal Government, on Wednesday, ordered Emmanson’s release from Kirikiri and withdrew charges against KWAM 1.

     Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo announced the decision on X. 

    This action preceded the unruly behaviour exhibited by the two individuals before the flight take-off.

    Keyamo said recent events in the industry concerning unruly behaviour of certain individuals are unfortunate, stating, lessons have been well highlighted for the travelling public.

    The controversy could have been avoided if the passengers had duly respected the precautions to follow before the flight took off.

    Travelling by air is an adventurous journey, but as much as the journey is controlled by the airline, there are still responsibilities that passengers must ensure they follow to avoid disrupting the flight or causing harm. It’s important to know the safety precautions before the plane takes off.

    Here are things you MUST DO before the flight takes off:

    1. Fasten your seat belt.

    This is the most effective safety precaution. Most modes of transportation always have to use a seatbelt during the journey, e.g, vehicles, buses, lorries, jets, planes, etc. This is essential as it ensures the safety of passengers on board. Passengers must fasten their seatbelts even if the seatbelt sign is turned off. Once the plane takes off, there’s a tendency for turbulence to take place, which makes the passenger vulnerable to harm.

    2. Switch off your phone

    While it’s good to stay in check with loved ones on the plane, it’s a must to either switch off your phone or put it on airplane mode. This is to avoid distortion with the airline communication network. The case of Emmanson would have been avoided if her phone had been duly switched off. 

    The pilot would always announce to the passengers what they needed to know and do. To ensure safety, passengers must respond attentively to the announcement. So, it’s either the phone is switched off or it’s placed on airplane mode. But, if the pilot says airplane mode, then so it should be. The unruly passenger, Emmanson, had placed her phone on airplane mode but the instruction to switch off the phone wasn’t followed, and that caused a dispute between her and the crew members, which led to physical assault.

    Here are MUST- DONT’S before flight take off:

    1. Boarding with Liquid Substance

    Passengers are not expected to take any form of liquids into the plane, such as water, alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, etc. This is strictly flagged off before entering the plane. This compromise got Kwam 1 placed on a one-month ban. He was accused of carrying a prohibited flask believed to contain alcohol, spilling its contents on personnel, and later walking onto the aircraft’s tarmac, allegedly blocking the plane from taxiing.

    Read Also: FG shuts Enugu airport runway; Air Peace, others suspend flight

    However, some airlines would share liquids and snacks with the passengers during the flight. 

    2. Boarding with weapons

    Weapons are flagged off immediately during security checks to ensure the safety of everyone. As such, passengers must not board the plane with weapons, such as knives, explosives, firearms, or any other dangerous objects.

    This is to prevent unforeseen threats that may endanger lives.

  • KWAM 1 named aviation security ambassador as FG reduces flight ban

    KWAM 1 named aviation security ambassador as FG reduces flight ban

    The Federal Government said it will engage Fuji legend Wasiu Ayinde Marshal, popularly known as KWAM 1, as an ambassador for proper airport security conduct following the recent controversy surrounding his behaviour at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.

    Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, disclosed this in a statement on Wednesday while outlining government resolutions on recent incidents of unruly behaviour at Nigerian airports.

    According to Keyamo, the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) has agreed to cut KWAM 1’s flight ban to one month and collaborate with the artiste to promote public awareness on acceptable conduct within the aviation sector.

    The Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria will lead the engagement process.

    Read Also: Kwam 1 and the dangerous cost of pride

    ”The NCAA is to reduce his flight ban to a one-month period. FAAN will also work with the music star with a view to engaging him as an ambassador for proper airport security protocol going forward.
    ‎
    ‎”Having publicly demonstrated penitence, the NCAA is also to withdraw its criminal complaints against KWAM 1 earlier lodged with the police,” the statement reads.
    ‎
    ‎The Minister added that the decision followed appeals from well-meaning individuals, as well as KWAM 1’s public show of penitence over the August 5 incident in which he allegedly obstructed a ValueJet aircraft’s movement.
    ‎
    ‎Keyamo also revealed that the NCAA would withdraw its criminal complaints against the artiste.
    ‎
    ‎The development comes days after the musician apologised to the public, insisting the flask he carried on the day of the incident contained water for medical reasons and not alcohol, as was alleged by security personnel.
    ‎
    ‎The Minister emphasised that the clemency was granted on “compassionate grounds” , warning that the government remained committed to enforcing safety and security laws in the aviation sector.

    On August 5, KWAM 1 was involved in a confrontation with airline staff and security officials at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, while attempting to board a ValueJet flight to Lagos.
    ‎
    He was accused of carrying a prohibited flask believed to contain alcohol, spilling its contents on personnel, and later walking onto the aircraft’s tarmac, allegedly blocking the plane from taxiing.
    ‎
    The Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority described the act as a breach of aviation safety regulations and initially placed him on a six-month no-fly list while filing a criminal complaint with the police.

  • IG orders probe of KWAM -1’s Abuja airport infraction

    IG orders probe of KWAM -1’s Abuja airport infraction

    • Ms. Emmanson remains in Kirikiri

    Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Olukayode Egbetokun yesterday ordered an investigation into the alleged obstruction of a Value Jet aircraft by Fuji Musician, Wasiu Ayinde Marshal (popularly known as KWAM 1).

    The incident occurred on August 5 at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport (Domestic Wing), Abuja.

    The musician was prevented from boarding with a bottle of liquid, which he said was water.

    His reaction allegedly obstructed the safe operation of the aircraft, in violation of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Regulations, 2023. He later apologised.

    Force Public Relations Officer, Olumuyiwa Adejobi, a Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), said the probe directive followed the receipt of a petition from the Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA).

    Adejobi said: “The Police have received an official petition from the NCAA over an alleged incident involving Mr. Wasiu Ayinde Marshal (popularly known as KWAM 1).

    “In response, the IG, Kayode Egbetokun, has directed the Commissioner of Police, Airport Command, to immediately commence a thorough investigation into the matter, to unravel the circumstances which led to the ugly incident and ensure justice is served accordingly.

    “The Force hereby assures the public of its commitment to upholding safety and security within Nigeria’s aviation sector, while assuring stakeholders in the sector of improved collaboration towards aviation security and strict compliance with aviation laws.”

    The musician was out on the no-fly list by the NCAA in addition to letters advising the IG to investigate and the Attorney-General of the Federation to prosecute him.

    The pilot and co-pilot of the Value Jet Airline also got their licenses suspended pending the conclusion of information.

    Read Also: Shettima commissions FGs ultra-modern ICT hub, two state aircraft in Cross River

     Regarding another incident, the Senate and lawyers weighed in yesterday on the remand of Ibom Air passenger, Ms. Comfort Emmanson, demanding a probe.

    Ms. Emmanson was remanded at the Kirikiri Correctional Centre on Monday after she was arraigned for the alleged assault of a cabin crew member.

    She was arraigned at the Ikeja Magistrates’ Court and remanded because she could not provide adequate sureties.

    Sources said she was still remanded at the Correctional Centre yesterday due to a mix-up in her remand order.

    It was learnt that the warrant was returned to the court for correction.

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Dr Doyin Awolaye, confirmed that he would represent Ms. Emmanson.

    “The family briefed me to represent her in all matters concerning the incident,” he told our reporter last night.

    The Senate said it would investigate recent airline passenger incidents.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Aviation, Senator Buhari Abdulfatai, in a statement, said the incidents have raised questions about operational standards, passenger rights, and the overall discipline within Nigeria’s aviation sector.

    He said these developments demand immediate and coordinated action to protect the integrity of the sector and restore public confidence.

    “In the exercise of its constitutional powers, the Committee will be engaging key regulatory bodies, operators, security agencies, and public interest groups to establish the facts, review existing procedures, and ensure that any necessary corrective measures are swiftly implemented.

    “We will not allow procedural gaps or lapses in enforcement to undermine safety, professionalism, or public trust in our aviation system.

    “The Senate Committee on Aviation will ensure accountability at all levels,” the Senator said.

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) condemned the treatment meted out to Ms. Emmanson by Ibom Air staff, describing it as reckless and a violation of her right to dignity.

    In a statement by its President, Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN), the association slammed the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) for imposing a lifetime flight ban on the passenger without affording her a fair hearing.

    The association called the decision heavy-handed, unlawful, and a grave affront to the rule of law and human dignity.

    The NBA expressed outrage over reports and video evidence showing Ms. Emmanson being forcibly removed from the aircraft, stripped of her clothing in public, and filmed in a humiliating state — footage that was later circulated online.

    “Such conduct is degrading, violates her right to dignity and privacy, and falls far short of the standards of civility and professionalism expected in the aviation sector,” the statement read.

    The association also alleged that an Ibom Air hostess prevented Ms. Emmanson from disembarking the aircraft, a move it said could constitute false imprisonment and may have provoked the confrontation.

    It insisted on an independent investigation before any disciplinary measures are taken.

    “The power to suspend or restrict a passenger’s right to fly rests with the appropriate statutory regulator, not private associations or airline operators acting unilaterally,” NBA stated.

    It further condemned the unedited filming and online distribution of the incident, calling it “an egregious invasion of privacy and a criminal act.”

    It demanded the prosecution of those responsible for recording and circulating the footage without concealing Ms. Emmanson’s nudity.

    As part of its demands, the NBA called on Ibom Air to immediately withdraw the lifetime ban, issue a public apology, and cooperate fully with relevant authorities, including the Ministry of Aviation, the NCAA, and the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), in conducting a thorough inquiry.

    The NBA pledged to offer Ms. Emmanson pro bono legal support to seek redress for the alleged violations.

    “We will not remain silent while the fundamental rights of any Nigerian are trampled upon, whether by public authorities, private corporations, or individuals.

    “Respect for human dignity and the rule of law must never be compromised, and in this matter, justice must prevail,” the statement concluded.

    Also, the Lagos Branch of the African Women Lawyers Association (AWLA) Nigeria, said it was outraged by the forced removal of Ms. Emmanson from an Ibom Air aircraft and the exposure of her body.

    AWLS described the treatment as utterly unacceptable, degrading, and in clear violation of the dignity and fundamental human rights of the victim.

    The Coordinator, Adesola Bello, said: “We strongly condemn not only the unprofessional and inhumane actions of the airline crew, but also the complicity of airport security officials whose duty is to protect and ensure the safety of passengers, not to participate in or permit acts of humiliation.”

    AWLA said the incident underscored the urgent need for a thorough, independent investigation into the matter by relevant authorities, including FAAN, the NCAA, and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

    It called for the suspension and sanction of all crew members and security officials involved pending the outcome of the investigation.

    “There must be adequate compensation and a public apology to the victim for the psychological trauma, physical exposure, and reputational harm suffered.

    “The AWLA stands firmly against any form of violence, humiliation, or abuse targeted at women and girls.

    “We will continue to advocate for the protection of women’s rights, demand accountability from institutions, and ensure that incidents like this are met with swift justice.

    “We call on all stakeholders in the aviation industry to treat passengers with respect and humanity at all times, regardless of any disagreements or operational challenges.”

    NCAA: why Kwam 1 was not charged

    Director of Public Affairs and Consumer Protection at the NCAA, Mike Achimugu, clarified the agency’s role in the two passenger incidents, saying the authority only intervenes where necessary and within its mandate.

    Speaking on a television programme, Achimugu said in the case involving KWAM 1, the airline did not press charges.

    “The airline [in the singer’s case] did not activate its right to take the passenger to court.

    “As a result, the NCAA petitioned relevant authorities to prosecute the passenger, issuing an advisory to the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) to have the passenger banned,” Achimugu said.

    In the Ibom Air case where a passenger assaulted the airline’s staff member, he explained that the carrier immediately exercised its right to take up the matter in court.

    “Maybe because their staff had been assaulted, the airline immediately activated its right to take up the matter, and it went to court, so the NCAA is not involved in the case of the Ibom Air passenger,” he said.

    He dismissed allegations of double standards.

    The charges against Emmanson

    The police said Ms. Emmanson (Bob), on August 10, while onboard Ibom Aircraft No. 5N-BXP parked at Murtala Muhammed Airport Terminal Two (MMA2), Ikeja, “did behave in an unruly and disorderly manner by shouting on top of your voice, abusing and assaulting the flight crew and refusing to disembark from the aircraft after landing.”

    The alleged offence is contrary to Section 4 (1) (a) and punishable under Section 4(2) of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) bye law 2005.

    The charge said the accused “did assault one Juliana Edward by slapping and hitting her cheeks with your right hand and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 170 (1) (a) (b) and punishable under Section 172 of The Criminal Law of Lagos State of Nigeria, 2015”.

    Ms. Emmanson, in Count Three, allegedly assaulted one Jokpame Sagun “by hitting her face with your slippers.”

    She was also accused of “willfully” damaging the aircraft divider cotton valued at $2,500 belonging to Ibom Air, an offence contrary to Section 350 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State.

  • KWAM 1 vs ValueJet

    KWAM 1 vs ValueJet

    • Aviation authorities must do the rightful on the matter

    The display between Wasiu Omagbolahan Olasunkanmi Adewale Ayinde Marshal, a veteran Fuji musician, better known as KWAM 1 or K1 De Ultimate, and the crew and staff of ValueJet Airline, at the domestic wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, last week, is reprehensible and we hope valuable lessons have been learnt by the parties. Both parties have been sanctioned by the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA).

    While the licenses of the pilot, Captain Oluranti Ogoyi, and the co-pilot, First-Officer Ivan Oloba, were suspended pending investigation, Ayinde has been placed on no-fly ban for six months.

    We agree with the Minister of Aviation, Festus Keyamo, SAN, that both parties deserved to be sanctioned. A viral video of the incident showed Ayinde with a flask, moving around a ValueJet aircraft going to Lagos. At a point he was standing in front of the aircraft, and later leaning on it, and was said to have resisted entreaties not to carry the substance into the aircraft.

    When confronted by the security, he claimed the substance was water, but the pilot claimed the content spilled on her was alcohol. For security reasons, there are limitations on what a passenger can carry into an aircraft.

    Read Also: Kwam 1 banned from air travels

    The viral video does grave injury to the reputation of our aviation safety standards. The minister has described it as akin to a hostage situation, and the NCAA has written to the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice and the Inspector-General of Police, to investigate the matter and prosecute Ayinde, and anyone who has infringed any law.

    While we await the outcome of such investigation, we find it disconcerting that Ayinde was ready to use his body as a shield to ensure the aircraft did not depart. But for his vigilance, the wing of the aircraft would have severed his head, as the aircraft departed despite his protests.

    We wonder what Ayinde was thinking when he was shown on the video making calls. Considering his exposure, he ought to know that if his rights are breached, he has many avenues for redress, including the court of law.

    While blaming Ayinde for self-help, we agree that the pilots breached the departure protocol, and thus exposed Ayinde and the passengers and staff of the airline on the ground to mortal danger. To commence departure without adhering to mandatory pre-departure clearance protocol was thoroughly unprofessional.

    As rightly stated by NCAA, the actions of the pilots endangered the safety of ground personnel. Before departure, the security should have taken Mr Ayinde and his staff, into custody, for trying to obstruct the departure of the aircraft.

    We support appropriate disciplinary measures against the pilots and the security staff who ought to have followed due protocol in handling the situation, instead of indulging Ayinde and his staff. The pilot claimed that Ayinde was not within her view when she moved, but before an aircraft starts to taxi, the pilot ought to get signal from the ground crew. Perhaps, the pilot may have lost her cool, as she alleged Ayinde spilled the contents of the flask on her, when she came down from the cockpit to appeal to him.

    But for unnecessary indulgence, the pilots should not have interfered with the boarding procedure, as there are designated officers who should take care of that.

    We commend the NCAA and the minister for the steps taken so far. The AGF and the IGP should give the request from the NCAA the deserved attention. And following due process, sanctions should be meted to anyone who may have breached the standard safety protocols of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

    Of course we are aware that Ayinde has apologised to the minister on the matter, we leave the decision on his apology entirely in the hands of the aviation authorities.

    We nonetheless reiterate that that viral video was bad optics for our country.