Tag: Marafa

  • Saraki names Marafa, Sen. Tinubu  committee chairmen

    Saraki names Marafa, Sen. Tinubu committee chairmen

    Senate President Bukola Saraki yesterday announced a major shake-up in the Senate committee membership.

      Saraki named senators who were opposed to his election as Senate President as chairmen of key committees.

     The spokesman of the Senate Unity Forum Senators, Kabiru Marafa (Zamfara Central) was taken from the Committee on National Identity Card/ National Population to head the  Committee on Petroleum Resources (Downstream). The committee was vacated by Senator Uche Ekwunife whose election was nullified by the Appeal Court.

      Senator Barau Jibrin (Kano North) oversaw the committee in the absence of Ekwunife.

     Another opponent of Saraki, Senator Suleiman Hukunyi, was named the Chairman, Senate Committee on National Identity/national population.

     Senator Oluremi Tinubu was redeployed from Women Affairs Committee to chair the Senate committee on Environment.

      Others are: Senator Hope Uzodinma (Committee on Customs); Senator Adamu Aliero (Senate Committee on Aviation); Senator Barau Jibril (Senate Committee on Tertiary Institutions); Senator Joshua Dariye (Committee on Public Procurement);Senator  Babajide Omoworare (Committee on Legislative Compliance); Senator Adokwe Suleiman (Senate Committee on Information and National Orientation); and Senator Baba Kaka Garbai (Committee on Rules and Business).

    Also appointed chairmen are: Senator Tijani Kaura (Committee on Federal Character);Senator Eyinnaya Abaribe (Committee on Power); and Senator James Manager (Committee on Solid Minerals).

     Senator Ahmed Ogembe (Kogi Central, PDP) was appointed vice chairman of the Committee on Marine Transport. Senator Ovie Omo-Agege (Delta Central, Labour Party) was named vice chairman of the Committee on Land Transport.

     The re-composition of the Senate committees was one recommendations of the Senate Peace Committee chaired by Senator Manager.

     Saraki adjourned plenary till September 13 after the announcement.

     He urged the committees to use the holiday to conclude their annual reports.

  • The Marafa I Know

    The Marafa I Know

    Still on Marafan Sokoto
    Last week I paid tribute to Alhaji Umaru Shinkafi, Marafan Sokoto and one of Nigeria’s foremost politicians and respected leaders, who died on July 6. Today I am giving up the page for another tribute by one of his closest confidants, Saidu Mohammed Dansadau, a two-term senator from Zamfara State, who served with distinction, dignity and integrity.
    Dansadau’s tribute is followed by some of the reactions to my own tribute.

    “Great men are the guideposts and landmarks in the State”

    Nearly everybody in my generation who grew up in the North had heard of Umaru Shinkafi, the Marafan Sokoto. He was the super spook who knew something about everybody.

    Military President, General Ibrahim Babangida, had just lifted the ban on party politics in 1989 and political associations were being formed. That was when my path first crossed that of Marafa when we formed the Sokoto Organisation (then Zamfara was part of Sokoto State).

    I was young and a firebrand.  Little did I know that I made a deep impression on him during our first meeting. After the meeting he sent for me and asked me to see him in Shinkafi. That was the beginning of a close and intimate relationship, a mentoring and close benevolent big brother relationship.

    When the military government decreed National Republican Convention (NRC) and the Social Democratic Party (SDP) into being, we joined the NRC whose manifesto we identified with and which we hoped to deepen. Marafa was running to be the presidential candidate of the NRC.

    Not being a product of the known political establishment of the time, his aspiration seemed rather audacious. And, as every intelligence operator knows, he had made some powerful political enemies who would go to great lengths to stop him. But they did not reckon with his discipline and solid organisational abilities.

    Soon, his campaign took off. He appointed me his Campaign Coordinator for Sokoto State. I think he liked how I organised the campaign, for, after six months he pulled me out to Kaduna and promoted me to coordinate his campaign  for the whole Northern states.

    It was a most tasking and exhaustive campaign. We threw everything into it and came close enough to the more fancied Malam Adamu Ciroma as the winner to demand a run-off. However, while we waited, Babangida announced the cancellation of the primaries and banned a crop of politicians, including Shinkafi and Malam Adamu.

    Babangida said he wanted new-breed politicians and despite the experience, resources, network, relationships built, and the draining mental and physical exertions, Shinkafi took it with equanimity and moved on. At the NRC convention in Port Harcourt under Option A4, Shinkafi supported the presidential candidature of Bashir Tofa and the National Chairmanship of the late Dr. Hameed Kusamotu.  Both won.

    When the dust settled, I told him I was returning to Sokoto to continue my life. But he had other plans. He convinced me to stay in Kaduna and bought a house for me.

    It’s been 27 years since then and I have found Marafa as constant as a Northern Star: solid, steady, calm and unflappable. He was an extra-ordinarily selfless, admirably humble, gentle, soft-spoken, self-effacing, diligent, circumspect, shrewd and generous man.

    But he was also a misunderstood man; he was not given to smiling easily, and people thought that this mien reflected his heart. However, even though he carried a serious mien, Marafa had a keen sense of humour.

    A lot of people thought Shinkafi was stupendously wealthy because of his generosity to people. His wealth, however, was not in material possessions but in the generosity of his heart.

    Marafa was the source of permanent shelter for so many of his household members, house helps, staff, classmates, neighbours, friends and the under-privileged. I can attest to that. In 2002, even as a senator, he offered me a house in Kaduna, valued at 30 Million Naira at the time, for the 1.6 million Naira he bought it many years earlier. There were many of such.

    His philanthropy went beyond individuals. He provided basic amenities, such as schools,  clinics and infrastructure to several communities. He also built mosques to cater for the spiritual needs of members of communities.

    When the Muslim Students Society leader of Usman Danfodio University, Sokoto, came to pay condolence to his family, he said the university authorities had informed them that it was Shinkafi who built, furnished and equipped the Juma’at Mosque in the university, some 30 years ago. This was to the surprise of family members because Marafa had never mentioned it to anyone.

    That was Marafa. He gave for Allah and there were many such examples.

    Marafa also had the capacity to forgive, to a fault. Even when he knew somebody had cheated him in a business relationship, he would still put up with the person. In the more obvious cases whenever he was advised to end the relationship, his standard answer was always: any person in a position of prominence in any society should know this came with the territory.

    Politically, Umaru Shinkafi was, among other things, an apostle of broad political affiliations. He believed that what united us was more than what divided us as a nation.

    To a large extent, the emergence of General Muhammadu Buhari as the presidential candidate of the APP in 2003 was substantially a product of sacrifice by Umaru Shinkafi. That year APP governors and the leadership of the APP in states not controlled by the party resolved to field him as the party’s presidential candidate.

    Former Sokoto State Governor, Attahiru Bafarawa, and former Kwara State Governor, the late Mohammed Lawal, were delegated to intimate Shinkafi of this resolution. This was in my presence. He thanked them and appreciated their offer. He, however, courteously declined and asked them to field General Buhari. He assured them he would give whatever support he could muster to ensure General Buhari won.

    There are, as one political sage once observed, some men who lift the age they inhabit till all men walk on higher ground in that lifetime. Umaru Shinkafi was such a man. He bestrode the security, political and humanitarian world and was acknowledged for his patriotism industry, depth of knowledge, discipline, empathy and competence.

    May Allah grant him peace in Aljanna Firdaus.

     

    Re: Exit of a spymaster

    Thank you for a wonderful epitaph in today’s The Nation back page on my biological father, Marafan Sokoto. It was concise and captured his politics and career.

    I would have liked a mention of the total number of states won by the APP/AD alliance as it was an excellent challenge to the military gang-up of money and might in the other party and that feat was never replicated till Buhari’s victory last year, which was also due to the partnership again with the Yoruba. The embryo of that relationship was the AD/APP alliance.

    • Fatima Shinkafi,

    +2348036009838.

     

    Shinkafi’s death was greatly felt in my home town, Ikirun, Osun State, where he used to humbly sit outside with the late mother of his late friend, Hammed Kusamotu, in their residence long after Kusamotu’s death. May ALLAH (SWT) grant him Aljanna Firdaus. Amen.

    • Alabi Tajudeen,

    +2348055952747.

     

    How could Shinkafi be a spymaster when all his life he had been involved in internal security? The Police, NSO & later DSS are in charge of internal security. I believe it is the NIA that deals with external security, where spymasters dwell. Shinkafi of blessed memory never served there. May Allah have mercy on his soul.

    • Barrister Buhari Bello,

    +2348037881004.

     

    I used the word in the broad sense of “someone who directs clandestine intelligence activities” as it is defined in my online Advanced English Dictionary.

    • MKH.

     

    The late Gen. Hassan Usman Katsina did not participate in Babangida’s transition. It was Major-General Shehu Musa Yar’adua, equally a formidable member of the establishment, who did.

    • Umaru Shuaibu,

    Suleja.

    +2348033110505.

     

    Umaru Shuaibu was one of several readers who wrote to say my mention of Major-General Hassan Usman Katsina among leading Northerners who stood up for “June 12” was in error. It wasn’t. General Hassan Usman was, of course, never a politician and I did not say he participated in Babangida’s transition programme. But as a leading Katsina royalty, the first and only military governor of Northern Region and a former army chief, his standing up for “June 12”, just like Malam Adamu Ciroma’s, belied the propaganda about a grand Northern conspiracy against Chief Abiola.

    • MKH.

     

    I wish to suggest that the motto/slogan of Niger State should be changed from the current “Power State” to “Home of Hydropower” in order not to miss its import and intent. This would not be the first time a state is changing its motto/slogan. Sokoto changed from “Cibiyar Daular Usumaniya” to “Seat of the Caliphate” and Kaduna from “Liberal State” to “Centre of Learning”, etc.

    • Abdulrahman M. Alfa,

    Kaduna.

    +2348058903377.

  • Protesters ask Saraki to quit

    Protesters ask Saraki to quit

    • Call for Saraki’s suspension

    It was anti-climax yesterday in the Senate. The speculated plot by some Senators to engender the suspension of Senator Kabiru Marafa failed to materialise.

    The Senate resolved to refer Marafa, who represents Zamfara Central Senatorial District to its Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions over alleged uncomplimentary comments against the institution of the Senate.

    Instead of the reported suspension, protesters took over the gate of the National Assembly. They demanded the resignation of Senate President Bukola Saraki.

    Although, Chairman of the Ethics and Privileges Committee, Senator Samuel Anyanwu submitted the committee’s report on alleged Marafa’s misdemeanor, the report was not considered.

    Some Senators claimed that the report was not considered “for some obvious reasons” without saying exactly what amounted to “obvious reasons.’

    The title of the report of the investigation of Marafa, which was the eight to be received by the Senate yesterday simply read: “That the Senate do receive the report of the Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions in respect of the complaint from Senator Isah Misau and two others against Senator Kabiru Marafa over a publication on February 7th 2016 and for allegedly misleading the public against the Senate and the National Assembly.”

    Immediately Anyanwu laid the report as required by the Senate rules, there was heightened tension especially in the Senate gallery that the report would be considered to pave the way for the suspension of the Zamfara lawmaker.

    That was not to be as the Senate considered a few other reports and apparently kept the investigative report on Marafa in view.

    When the committee met on Monday, Marafa was absent forcing members of the committee to go into a closed session to take a position.

    Also, the prime mover of the motion that led the Senate to resolve to investigate Marafa, Senator Isah Hamma Misau was absent.

    Senator Mathew Urhoghide, who seconded the motion appeared before the committee to defend the motion.

    It was not clear when the report would be considered but some insiders noted that considering the high wired politics associated with the issues raised by Marafa in the alleged offensive interview, the Senate might take its time before considering the report.

    It is also not clear what the Senator Anyanwu Ethics and Privileges Committee recommended to the Senate.

    A source said that the committee might have taken exception to Marafa’s absence at the investigative hearing on Monday to ask the Senate to reprimand him.

    Another source noted that “Marafa is likely to escape severe punishment especially when only four members of the committee out of a total of 11 members attended the investigative hearing on Monday.”

    Yet another source said that the controversial report might be considered today “due to its urgency and need to reassure Nigerians that Saraki is still in charge of the Senate.”

    The group of protesters under the aegis of Open Society Coalition and Good Governance Initiative, demanded for the immediate resignation of Saraki “in order for him to focus on his trial at the CCT.”

    The group displayed banners with various inscriptions such as: “Suspend Saraki, not Marafa”; “Stop suspending members, leave the Senate and face CCT”; “Democracy survives in inclusiveness, not in suspending people of different opinion”;  and “National Assembly, centre of Democracy not Fascist centre.”

    Coordinator of the group, Mr. Emeka Ude, told reporters that the planned suspension of Marafa was undemocratic.

    He said that the suspension of Marafa would dent the image of the Senate and portray the upper chamber as an institution that is opposed to free speech.

    Ude said, “Democracy thrives where there is fairness, rule of law, freedom of expression among others.

    “In a situation where the legislature is foreclosing the democtatic space, that is an invitation to Fascism”

    He noted that Saraki should encourage others with contrary views instead of trying to suppress them through threat of suspension.

    Asked why they were clamouring for the resignation of the Senate President, Ude said Saraki was standing criminal trial before the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

    He also faulted the referral of the alleged Marafa derogatory comments to the Senate Ethics Committee saying it showed Saraki had made up his mind to punish Marafa.

    END

     

  • Marafa takes Senate to court

    Marafa takes Senate to court

    The Senator representing Zamfara Central, Kabiru Marafa, has sued the Senate to court over plan to sanction him for alleged unethical remarks.

    Marafa asked the court to halt his trial by the Senate Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions Committee.

     In a letter to the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, and dated February 18, Marafa drew the Senate’s attention to a case pending before an Abuja High Court against the alleged illegal constitution of 65 Senate Committees.

    He submitted that until that case was determined, the Senate could not investigate or try him using same committees he was asking the court to quash.

    The Senate had on Tuesday asked its committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions to try Marafa for allegedly making an uncomplimentary remark against it.

     In a letter, written by Marafa’s lawyer, Chief Ademuyiwa Adeniyi, pointed stated:

     “Obviously, our clients cannot under this circumstance have a fair hearing…

      “Nothing is more honourable than allowing justice to take its full course since this is a jurisprudential principle recognised by the extant rules of the Senate.”

  • Marafa versus Senate

    SIR: The newest face-off in the Senate pitching loyalists of the Senate President Dr. Bukola Saraki and the spokesperson of the Unity Forum, Senator Kabiru Marafa (Zamfara Central) is one of numerous irrelevant in-house divisions in the National Assembly, which instigates diversions in the legislature from key national issues.

    Following the direction of the controversial letter of indictment by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to the National Assembly, and the newspaper outburst by Senator Marafa in relation to accusations levied in the letter, the Senate appears to be instituting a decoy from the real issues presented in the former by ducking under the old-divide of the latter. And just as the house leadership tussle dragged forever, the senate is on the verge of instituting another lengthy digression by subjecting itself to chasing newspaper statements.

    Contrary to claims by Senator Issa Missau (Bauchi South) of Marafa’s newspaper exposé, his (Marafa) opinion appears to be an ideal representation of current realities in the Nigerian legislature, which should be ignored neither by Nigerians nor by the National Assembly. Central is the Senate President’s lingering corruption case with the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), which is in itself an embarrassment and a bad precedence by the Senate whom should be an agency of change, while the call for sanity in the Senate should not be handled with political mind-set. Also to Missau’s claims of right infringements in the Marafa interview, his (Marafa) statements are in correlation with his duties as an elected representative of people hence, his legitimacy to question the integrity of an institution he is elected a member. If Marafa’s claims were to be lies as suggested by the pro-Saraki faction, an in-house investigation should determine that and not the political persecution of a senator.

    Senator Dino Melaye’s labelling of fellow senator as living on ‘cheap drugs’, and the declaration of the Saraki-CCT legal battle to be a fight against the Senate  is one worthy of investigation by the House Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petition and not Marafa’s integrity-check calls. The argument that Saraki should resign to attend to his court charges should not even be contended in a serious and upright system as it underscores the irresponsiveness of the eighth assembly to its sworn constitutional duties.

    Part of the fundamentals of the Senate is to assure self-integrity as representatives of Nigerians, a call not too strong by a senator, and rather than investigating indictments of gross corruption in the legislature – an embarrassment for a serious senate – it is reigniting unnecessary divide in the already bastardised house. As a matter of priority, the real question should lie in the inquiry of the falsity of Obasanjo’s letter and not in the validity of Marafa’s statements.

    With the Saraki-CCT case, the Senate allowance controversies, and other indicting issues at hand, the Senate would appear thoughtful if it judiciously devotes resources to address the pending and restore its battered image rather than chasing realists and their words. Naira is falling drastically, electricity tariff is initiating commotion, the constitution is appearing weaker and the Senate is yet to come to terms with realities at hand but devotes time to play caucus politics again.

    The controversy surrounding the election base of forged document is still hanging in court. I pray the judiciary will live up to expectation in this case and several others. Nigerians are no fools; we are watching and waiting.

     

    • Adedayo Thomas,

    Lagos.

  • Senate v. Marafa

    Senate v. Marafa

    The Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is a sacred institution, which deserves the respect of every citizen. But when its actions or attempted actions elicit screaming and scary headlines from the media, caution is warranted.

    In the matter of Senate versus Kabiru Marafa, one of its own, the following are recent sample headlines: “Planned suspension of anti-Saraki senator heightens tension at Senate” (The Punch); “Unity Forum Senators’ speaker in trouble” (Nigerian Observer); “Senate mulls suspension of Senator Marafa, 10 others” (Daily Post); “For allegedly disrespecting the Senate, read what will happen to Senator Marafa”, (NAIJ.COM); “Row in Senate over move against anti-Saraki senator” (The Nation); “CCT trial: Team Saraki moves to silence opposition in Senate” (The Eagle Online); and “Senate moves against top anti-Saraki senator, Kabiru Marafa” (Premium Times).

    While it took quite a bit of patient Internet surfing to fish out the original Marafa interview itself, news and comments about Senate reaction comes to live pretty fast and they are more embarrassing to that distinguished body than the interview.

    Here’s a sampling of the readers’ comments on the Senate-Marafa news in various media outlets:

    “Why should he be punished for saying his views”? (NAIJ.COM); “Very shameless Senate and senators” (Premium Times); “As far as am concern (sic) I see nothing wrong with Sen. Marafa’s interview granted by (sic) Punch. He’s entitle (sic) to that constitutional right, so let him express the more…” (Premium Times); “Senator Kabiru Marafa stand your ground. We want many like you to populate the house…” (The Punch); “Thought we are in a democracy. Free speech is the heart and head of democracy…” (The Punch); “What sort of privilege leaves out decorum and probity?””Truth is the only constant thing that stands the test of time…” (The Punch)

    One of the commentators had a direct hit on the nail head. It makes a huge difference that we abandoned monarchical and feudal systems. Many subjects had their heads chopped off in the dungeons of kings just for disagreeing with their imperial majesties. It also makes a huge difference that we are no longer a colony. Recall that one of the grandfathers of modern Nigeria, Herbert Macaulay, was a regular in the colonial jail because he regularly “embarrassed” the colonial government. And we are the better for the victory over military dictatorship and its various decrees, which constrained the freedom of thought and discussion.

    We opted for liberal democracy and it comes with identifiable freedoms all of which are entrenched in our grundnorm, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. One of them, the fundamental foundation of liberal democracy is the freedom of thought and discussion. This freedom supersedes any institutional rules that may conflict with it and no institutional privilege can be canvassed against it. That our distinguished senators appear to ignore this important principle is itself an embarrassment.

    The foremost defender of the liberty of thought and expression in the history of liberal democratic governance is John Stuart Mill. It is always wise to remind ourselves of the principle at such a time as this:

    “It is not in constitutional countries to be apprehended, that government, whether completely responsible to the people or not, will often attempt to control the expression of opinion, except when in doing so it makes itself the organ of the general intolerance of the public. Let us suppose, therefore, that the government is entirely at one with the people, and never thinks of exerting any power of coercion unless in agreement with what it conceives to be their voice. But I deny the right of the people to exercise such coercion, either by themselves or by their government. The power itself is illegitimate. The best government has no title to it than the worst…..If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”

    And there you have it from the High Priest of Liberalism. A progressive party in government cannot forget its distinguishing mark as the protector of human freedom in all its manifestations, including in the expression of personal opinion. Even if the whole country rejects the opinion expressed by Senator Marafa in his Punch interview, it is the responsibility of the Senate of the Federal Republic to not only accommodate him, but to protect him from the coercion of the public. That is what senators swear to do when they took their oath of office.

    Assume that the senator’s opinion is indeed wrong, all that is available to the rest of the public or the Senate is to expose his error and let the two or more opinions enter the market place of ideas for contest. The truth will thereafter prevail because the erroneous opinion will have been exposed.

    It follows that citizens will be able to examine the views expressed by Senator Marafa along with the corrections put out by other members of the Senate who feel that he is wrong. As intelligent human beings, it should be assumed that citizens will make up their mind about who is right or wrong.

    After the controversy broke out and those headlines screamed at me in every media resource that I accessed, I decided to check out the record of the senator’s interview. What I found was amazingly benign. Indeed, at many points and in many junctures in the course of the interview, the senator defended the Senate as an institution, including in the matter of its budget.

    The reporter asked Senator Marafa if he agreed with former President Obasanjo’s allegation of corruption against NASS. Marafa responded that he didn’t see Obasanjo’s letter and didn’t want to speculate. But from what he read in the papers, Obasanjo wanted NASS to make its budget public and he Marafa considered it “a genuine call” and the Senate President equally agreed with the President’s suggestion.

    On whether the budget of N120bn to N150bn for NASS can be justified, Marafa observed that “sharing of money should not be the basis of the performance of legislators. Maybe the less they earn the better.” But he quickly added that this was another good reason for laying bare the budget because just looking at the numbers is not sufficient for accusing legislators of corruption.

    With regard to the controversial budget of N4.7bn for cars, Marafa responded that he didn’t think that “it is the right thing to do” and called for its abandonment. “That is my opinion and I stand by it”, he stated. On whether NASS is doing enough about austerity measures, the senator objected to the question and suggested that the problem with some Nigerians was that they “tend to just say things without properly looking at the implication of everything.” He added: “If you want me to function, you have to equip me very well.” He then went into a lively discussion of how much the United States invests in its senators and congressmen and congress women.

    On the issue of whether the jostle for power in the 8th NASS was justification for Obasanjo’s allegations, Marafa countered again that it was not jostling for power as such, but that there is “abuse of the laws of the Senate and the laws of the country. And when the reporter pressed further concerning the length of time some senators have served in the Senate, including those who have been there since 1999, Marafa argued that experience matters, again comparing the United States where there is no term limit with Nigeria where legislators are changed at will on the grounds that the privilege must go round. He saw the limitation on experience as a drawback.

    Overall, I do not see what is subversive to the Senate as an institution in Marafa’s publicised views. And if some senators feel otherwise, what they ought to do is to call him out by exposing his errors. Threatening suspension on account of a senator’s public expression of opinion is an unfortunate example of the much dreaded tyranny of the majority.

  • Senate committees: Marafa, Wakili in near fisticuffs

    Senate committees: Marafa, Wakili in near fisticuffs

    Two All Progressives Congress (APC) Senators, Kabiru Marafa and Ali Wakili almost exchanged blows over the constitution of Senate committees by Senate President Bukola Saraki.

    Marafa had sought further explanation from Saraki on his observation that the manner of the constitution of Senate committees was in contravention of Senate Standing Rules.

    The Zamfara Central lawmaker had last week told the Senate that because Saraki failed to subject the constitution of the committees to the approval of the Senate, the committees were illegal and non existent.

    He also faulted the composition of the Senate Selection Committee headed by Saraki saying specifically that the Deputy Senate Leader, Bala Ibn Na’Allah, is not the proper person to represent the Northwest because there were more ranking Senators than him.

    At the resumption of plenary yesterday, Marafa attempted to bring up the issue again during the debate on Senate Legislative Agenda.

    Saraki ruled him out of order on the ground that the Senate Rule frowns at reopening issues upon which the Senate had drawn conclusion.

    Saraki said the Votes and Proceedings on the composition of Senate committees had already been adopted.

    At this stage, Marafa stormed out of the Senate chamber and headed for the Senate Press Corps Centre.

    Unknown to him, Wakili was trailing him and followed him to the Press Centre where altercation ensued.

    Wakili (Bauchi South) said: You have come here to disgrace the Senate again. Is this what you want to do for the next four years?

    Marafa: I will, I will. Because I am not working for you.

    Wakili: You cannot sit down there and fight against the Senate.

    Marafa: I am representing Nigeria and representing my people. And let me tell you, even the nonsense thing they are saying about suspension, nobody can suspend a senator.

    Wakili: You are playing to the gallery. You are playing your script. Who has ever spoken about your suspension?

    Marafa: Let us talk about issues.

    Wakili: I have discussed your issues in today’s Mirror.

    Marafa: Mirror, which Mirror? Let us do it (address journalists).

    Wakili: Newspaper.

    Marafa: Who, my own?

    Wakili: Yes.

    Marafa: Mirror (Get me National Mirror). I will respond to it. We raised issues. And we give Orders and point of Constitution.

    Wakili: That is not what your Constituency sent you here (to do).

    Marafa: Are you one of them?

    Wakili: We are talking of poverty, education. You are wasting your energy here on useless Point of Order. I am warning you.

    Marafa: It is not useless. You can’t say that Point of Order is useless.

    Wakili: I will go to your constituency and see what you have done there.

    Marafa: Go back. I will go to your own. I was in politics before you when you were wearing uniform.

    At this stage the two Senators started dragging each other’s attire.

    Wakili: Gentlemen of the Press, there are issues bed evilling this country…. (Marafa interrupted him).

    Marafa: Even if you are God-fearing, because they made you Chairman, a bloody newcomer

    Chairman of a committee, that is why you are talking this way. I am not anybody’s game plan. I am speaking the minds of Nigerians.

    Wakili: Come, you are a storm in the Senate teacup and a Gad-fly.

    Marafa: I told you I was in politics when you were wearing uniform (dragging Wakili’s attire).

    Wakili: Leave me, look at it. That is not the issue. How old are you?

    Marafa: It doesn’t matter.

    Wakili: Let’s go.

    Marafa: (Talking to journalists). He said he raised issues in National Mirror. Let him say the issues, I will respond to them now, here.

    Wakili: You see, your experience has not helped you. It (Senate Rule) says that where such a matter has been decided, you cannot raise it again.

    Marafa: That is nonsense! That is hypocrisy. The problem with Senate President is that he was unwilling to learn his job. In the four years he stayed there, he was absent most of the time.

    Wakili: You are too personal. And this is not going to help you.

     

  • Senate’s 65 committees illegal, says Marafa

    Senate’s 65 committees illegal, says Marafa

    Some senators are grumbling over the composition of committees. Senator Kabiru Marafa (Zamfara Central) yesterday called for the immediate cancellation of the 65 standing committees announced on November 4 by Senate President Bukola Saraki.

    Marafa said the committees were constituted in flagrant disregard of the standing rules and order book of the Senate.

    Marafa, who spoke during plenary, described Order 1 of the Standing Rules as unambiguous, adding that the Senate’s business should be conducted in accordance with the spirit and letters of its Order and Rules Book.

    He labelled the prevailing situation in the upper chamber as “legislative tyranny”.

    He said: “What we are witnessing in the Senate today is legislative tyranny, where impunity has become the order of the day.”

    Marafa, who was assigned chairman, Senate Committee on National Identity and National Population and Vice Chairman of Senate Committee on Sports, faulted the increase of the number of committees by Saraki from 57 as contained in the Rules book to 65.

    He noted that it was wrong for the Senate President to have single handedly increased the number of committees without recourse to the Senate.

    He insisted that “if we can treat our own Order and Rules book with impunity, we have no reason whatsoever to be in the Senate.”

    Marafa also faulted the composition of the Selection Committee, a body of Senate Principal officers, which assigns committees.

    He noted that the Senate Deputy Leader, Senator Bala Ibn Na’Allah (Kebbi South), was not fit and proper to occupy the position because he is not the most ranking senator from the Northwest.

    Marafa said no fewer than six senators from the zone, including Senator Abu Ibrahim, Senator Kabiru Gaya, Ibrahim Gobir , Ahmed Sani Yerima and himself, are ranked higher than Na’Allah.

    Na’Allah was two times a member of the House of Representatives.

    He said the “wilful disregard of Senate Order 100, which stipulates that the chairman of the Selection Committee should in consultation with the committee and with the approval of the Senate should constitute committees’ should not be swept under the carpet.

    Marafa, who quoted the Senate Rules book to buttress his stand, noted that if the Senate President goes ahead to inaugurate the committees, “I expect Nigerians to charge him for contempt”.

    He added: “Nobody can read names of chairmen and vice chairmen of committees and just hit the gavel and expect us to accept them. We must be guided by our Rules book. By the time you abuse a section of the rule, everything will be in danger.”

    Marafa also said that he had not recanted that the Senate was not properly inaugurated “because the matter is still in court”.

    He explained that any time he used the Rules book, he always made it clear that he was using the “disputed” Rules book.

    He asked: “Was the committees subject to our approval today. The answer is no.”

    Asked whether he had rejected the committee assigned to him, Marafa said that he could not reject what does not exist.

    “There are no committees,” he insisted.

    “There is no committee. They are not legally constituted and they cannot function. Any further action is unacceptable to Nigerians and I have discharged that responsibility.’’

    Senator Suleiman Hunkuyi (Kaduna North), who supported Marafa with another Point of Order, insisted that there were procedures for constituting standing committees.

    Hunkuyi, who was named Vice Chairman, Federal Character Commission and Inter-Governmental Affairs, said there was no resolution on the committees at plenary.

    He said: “This is one of the three issues that we are contending. We are blowing the whistle, educating those that do not know and then throwing light on those areas that we feel Nigerians require to know.”

    However, Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs Senator Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi, said the committees were properly constituted and approved during the adoption of votes and proceedings yesterday.

    Abdullahi noted that no senator has the power to declare any proceeding in the Senate null and void because no senator is a judge.

    He said: “Marafa said the votes and proceedings of Wednesday, Nov. 4 were approved today and the approval contains the issues he is raising.

    “And it is very clear that the composition of committee leadership was part of the votes and proceedings. So, I don’t know what approval he is looking for.

    “As far as the Senate is concerned, we have approved the chairmen and vice chairmen of the 65 committees. I want to believe that the issues raised by Senator Marafa are not new at all.

    “It is just a repeat of what we have seen in the past. The issues he has raised cannot be far from the leadership issue which you are all very familiar with.’’

    Abdullahi urged all aggrieved senators to embrace peace and work for Nigeria’s progress.

    The Senate, he said, has serious work to do.

    The Senate President ruled that the Selection committee has “noted the Point of Order” raised by Marafa.

    Saraki added that the committee would note his observations.

    The Senate observed a minute silence in honour of the Acting Clerk of the Senate, Mr Adedotun Durojaiye, who died on Friday.

    After the silence, the Senate adjourned midway into plenary as a mark of respect for the late Durojaiye.

     

  • Re: Saraki, Marafa and ethical question

    SIR: I wish to refer to the article published penultimate week by this esteemed newspaper and commend the writer for a job well done.

    The issues, however, go far deeper than the ones enunciated in that piece, obviously because of space limitation associated with newspaper articles. But for those of us that hail from Zamfara, some of who are constituents of Senator Kabir Garba Marafa, we bear witness to how strong-willed and principled he could be when the matter has to do with principle.

    The issue between him and Senator Bukola Saraki, the Senate President, definitely goes beyond the personal. It remains a fact that if Marafa had wanted, he could simply have joined the pro-Saraki senators to ensure endless inflow of goodies to himself. But as someone that is bothered about legacy and building a good name, Marafa is even more concerned with the reputation of the Senate President, who he believes, has come a long way in politics, and should not allow anything, not even the lure of political office, to tarnish his good name.

    As that article correctly captured, it is alien to African culture for a son to disown his mother.  But politically and morally speaking, that is exactly what Senator Saraki did, going against the best wishes of the political party on whose platform he rose to power, conniving with the opposition PDP, which has ensured misery for Nigerians, to come to power. Anyone that loves Saraki will feel bad that the man has, in a seeming desperation, elevated personal interest above the collective. It is that personal, selfish interest, that has pushed the Senate President to last week, postponed a sitting of the Senate to appear before the Code of Conduct Tribunal, at a great cost to the nation.

    For a senate president that hails from a noble political home, whose father was one of the decent politicians that Nigeria has produced, what should matter to him is building a credible legacy, one which will protect and defend that name, even if with the last drop of his blood. Fortunately, it isn’t too late for Saraki to rediscover himself, even if the hangers-on benefitting from him would hardly allow him do what is right by making difficult sacrifice.

    It is high time the senators – or majority of them – stop ridiculing themselves by supporting the Senate President at every ridiculous turn, just to spite President Buhari and the APC, the political party that brought them to power. The issues before the nation are too fundamental to play politics with. And Nigerians did not vote for change, to have the status quo maintained.

    Presently, the economy is in dire straits, occasioned by the rot the incumbents inherited from the PDP, whose misrule lasted the whole of 16 years. Nigerians are suffering, and are very desirous of better life. Simplistically, it could be said that it is the responsibility of the executive to bring about the needed change. But we are running a presidential system of government in which the three arms compliment one another. In other words, without the Senate and the entire legislature making good laws directed at prosperity, the executive would remain helpless to bring about the promised change. And we, ordinary Nigerians will the worse for it.

    Even if, therefore, Saraki must continue as Senate President, he must ensure that henceforth, speaking at plenary is not restricted mainly to those that give him blind support. It isn’t a privilege but the right of every senator to speak on the floor of the senate, especially on issues that have to do with point of order. This is well enshrined in the nation’s constitution, and captured in the rules governing the senate, the infringement of which can, and shall, lead to impeachment of the presiding officer. Nigerians are watching. So also the international community. One-tenth of the four year period is already gone. We can’t afford continuous postponement of Senate sittings to satisfy the personal interest of one man, however powerful.

     

    • Hauwa’u Sule Zurmi,

    Old GRA, Gusau.

  • Uproar in Senate over vote of confidence on Saraki, others

    Uproar in Senate over vote of confidence on Saraki, others

    There was disquiet in the Senate on Tuesday over a vote of confidence passed on the Senate President, Bukola Saraki and other leaders of the upper chamber.

    The confidence vote supported by 83 Senators – 48 from Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and 35 All Progressives Congress (APC) members sparked protest on the floor of the Senate.

    Some Senators almost exchanged blows but for the quick intervention of other Senators who stood between the combatants.

    The motion was sponsored by Senator David Umaru (Niger East), while Senator Ahmed Rufai Yerima (Zamfara West) seconded.

    Tuesday’s vote of confidence on the leadership of the Senate was the second in two months, the first was on July 28 when the senators adopted confidence vote as a sign of solidarity to the Senate President and members of the Senate Leadership.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Business and Rules, Senator Babajide Omoworare (Osun East) may have unwittingly sparked the protest when he dissociated himself from the vote of confidence.

    Omoworare’s name was number 11 on the list of supporters of the motion sought and was granted permission by Saraki to make some observations on the motion.

    The Osun State APC lawmaker to the consternation of the promoters of the motion, said he was not consulted before his name was smuggled into the list of supporters of the confidence vote.

    He insisted that his name be struck out of the list since he knew nothing about the motion.

    He added that as chairman, Senate Business and Rules, he should have known about the motion “but because it came under a motion of urgent national importance”, he has no issue with the presentation.

    He, however, said his named should be removed from the list of sponsors of the motion.

    After the confidence vote had been moved and adopted, the Senate President gave Senator Kabiru Marafa (Zamfara Central) the floor to speak.

    Before Saraki gave the nod to Umaru to present his motion, Marafa was seen raising his hand several times.

    Senate President who may have gauged Marafa’s mindset ignored him and gave Umaru the floor to make his presentation.

    Marafa waited but when Saraki allowed him to speak, he came under Senate Order 53 (5) which says “Reference shall not be made to any matter on which a judicial decision is pending.”

    He was apparently referring to the welcome address by Saraki where the Senate President referred copiously to his ongoing trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

    But the Senate President asked Marafa to read Order 53(6) which states “It shall be out of Order to attempt to reconsider any specific question upon which the Senate has come to a conclusion during the current session except upon a substantive motion for rescission.”

    Instead of reading Order 53(6), Marafa chose to read Order 53(8) which says “No Senator shall impute improper motives to any other Senator.”

    Senate President promptly ruled Marafa out of order and asked him to sit down but he persisted.

    Marafa protested profusely, but his protest fell on deaf ears as the Senate President further ignored him.

    As Umaru read his prayers, Marafa was heard shouting “nay, nay, nay” to all the prayers.