Tag: Metuh

  • Ettu, Metuh?

    This is clearly not the best of times for the National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party, Chief Olisa Metuh. The official megaphone of the deflated and defeated behemoth, which once declared 60 years’ invincibility against any form of electoral loss before ending its 16 years of impunity in power, now faces a Herculean battle on two broad fronts – within and outside the party. For a man who has  taken up the challenge to engage the ruling All Progressives Congress toe-to-toe in the arena of political propaganda, this lonely voice in the wilderness could end up being a victim of the same system that propped him into national prominence. In truth and until now, Metuh has made a good job of shouting himself hoarse even as President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration effortlessly exhumes rotten secrets that passed on as governance in the last 16 years of the PDP’s rudderless leadership. No doubt, Metuh relishes his bird with a broken beak job.

    However, there is some sort of wicked twist in the Metuh tale. Instead of getting decorated with a crest of honour for standing tall for all that was bad with the self-styled ‘Africa’s largest political party’, Metuh might just be on his last step into the hall of infamy if the allegations made against him by employees of the party’s secretariat are anything to go by. Perhaps, Metuh would not have been the issue today if all the matters relating to the financing of the 2015 general elections by the party had been settled when the issue had come up earlier in the year. Recall that Metuh, who had initially threatened fire and brimstone, was the same person that told an anxious public that the matter had been settled within the family. Now, the aggrieved workers in Wadata House have decided to open the can of worms concerning the financial malfeasance that crippled a party with a lofty dream of constructing a skyscraper as its National Headquarters. If we were to use the workers’ exposition as a template for determining how bad the books were in Wadata House, it would deepen the way we grasp the shocking realities of the mind-boggling figures that the Buhari administration has been reeling out as funds that were illegally siphoned in the last five years.

     Here, we are talking about an embattled Metuh struggling to launder his ‘integrity’ before employees who describe him as nothing but a blubbering “repulse to professionalism and a source of embarrassment to party members.” Interestingly, while a clear and present danger was brewing under his watch as the party sinks into deeper crises, Metuh was busy blaming the APC for the self-inflicted misery afflicting his party. He said the aim was to hound him out of circulation as his “outspokenness” has discomfited the ruling APC. A statement signed by Metuh’s aide said the APC found a willing tool in a “handful of disgruntled PDP staff who are attacking him with a view to bringing him to public odium, distract him and deny our party a credible voice to propagate its positions.” That notwithstanding, Metuh has vowed to trudge on in his role “in the rebuilding of the PDP and in providing firm, credible and issue issues-based opposition to the ruling party.” Oh, how delusions can pervade the human mind!

    For those who value informed discourse, Metuh’s stance should be a welcome development because it provides an opportunity to unravel the hidden truth about how the PDP had vended deception as governance for close to two decades. With his vast experience as “the longest serving member of the National Executive Committee due to hard work and the confidence members of the party reposed in him as an individual”, it would be an act of blind injustice for the party to ease off Metuh just because some common office employees are ranting. By the way, who is better qualified than Metuh to puncture the basket of lies being peddled by the APC on the callous manner the treasury was looted and raped by the last administration?

     So, I wait with bated breath to see how Metuh would defend the latest accusation by the ‘uncomfortable’ APC that the last administration spent over N4.8 trillion on subsidy payments which dramatically jumped from a paltry N300 billion in 2010 to N1.9 trillion in 2012. I am sure this brave spokesperson is also studying the books to debunk the claim by the Nigerian Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (NEITI) in its latest report that the country lost about 160 million barrels of crude valued at $13.7 billion to oil theft between 2009 and 2012. What tale would he tell us to disprove Buhari’s claim that the government is in possession of verifiable information on the banks where the billions of looted oil funds were stashed? Would Metuh also disprove that as one of the many lies of a President who is trying to make sense out of a mumbo-jumbo handover notes by a PDP-led government? Would Metuh also take the former Chief of Defence Staff, Air Chief Marshall Alex Badeh, to task on his claim that the war against terror in the North-East was difficult to prosecute because the military lacked the relevant equipment and motivation in spite of the humongous money Jonathan claimed to have spent on re-equipping the military? What exactly would be his response to all the scandalous revelations of the blind, daylight looting being unearthed daily as Buhari clinically dissects the PDP’s padded shibboleths of treachery?

    Okay, let us give it to Metuh. He has not allowed the domestic tiff with his co-workers in the party to weigh him down. After all, he still managed to issue a statement in which he described the government’s economic agenda as something lifted from the communist bookshelf. He speaks of a ‘unilateral imposition of new regulations” to firm up the naira against a skyrocketing dollar as archaic and outdated. How marvellous! Question is: how workable is the modern and digitalised system that the PDP left behind for Buhari to deal with some months back? What checks did the PDP’s corrupt- proof administration place on the illegal freighting of slush funds to foreign accounts owned by top members of that government and their hangars-on? Why were piles of audit queries, including the ones addressed to The Presidency left unanswered?

    By the way, let us not forget the fact that the brouhaha started when the National Secretary of the PDP, Prof. Wale Oladipo, signed a circular indicating that they planned a 50 per cent reduction in the secretariat staff in addition to a 50 per cent reduction in the salaries and allowances of retained lucky staff. Could it then mean that the National Working Committee members were expecting the hands-on staff, who claimed to have worked in the Secretariat for 16 years, to accept the grim news with stoic equanimity? So, do we take it that the APC influenced the job-cutting strategy for a party that has been gloating since it lost out in the last election?  Somehow, we need not blame Metuh if he chooses to ignore some of these questions. Sometimes, it is quite nerve-wracking when those who have worked with you in the same office for 16 years decide to take you up on your stewardship. That is exactly what the band of ‘disgruntled’ staff is doing. They not only dismiss Metuh’s plea of APC’s romance as “absolute bunkum, clumsy, and blundering blackmail,” they said their boss’ gloating was a ‘weak shot from a mortally crippled arsenal’ (Well, I am sure it is not my own Arsenal FC!). Instead of begging the question, they simply tabled their own set of audit queries, moral and financial, before Metuh.

    They want him to defend an alleged endorsement of a rival party’s candidate when Prof. Charles Soludo was gunning for the Anambra State governorship seat and Metuh was National Chairman, South-East. They spoke of his open endorsement of an APGA candidate in the 2013 Anambra governorship election. As entrenched staff with deep knowledge of the party’s operational manual, they seek an explanation into how “a whopping sum of N450 million media fund earlier approved for the office of PDP Publicity Secretary by President Jonathan” was spent. They said it would not be out of place for Metuh to explain how he has been spending the N70m he allegedly collected in July this year, to prosecute a media war with the APC. Could it be true that the leadership of the party squandered the N12 billion being proceeds from the sale of nomination forms in the last general elections? Was another N1 billion that was realised from a compulsory levy of N10, 000 paid by delegates frittered by the NWC? What exactly was the role Metuh played in the widely-reported money-for-governorship-ticket bribery scandal involving a former House of Representatives member and the leadership of the party? What transpired in Kogi State at the party’s congresses in which some persons were said to have demanded another whopping N1 billion bribe to ensure the return of the incumbent governor as the state’s gubernatorial candidate in the forthcoming November elections?

    Questions, questions and more questions. Surely, it is not enough for Metuh to brush the allegations off as witch-hunt by persons who are envious of his intimidating profile as the critical voice in a party that is just learning the ropes of what it takes to be an opposition party. No one learns that from the books. It comes with the sort of experience that resulted in the birth of the APC after fighting from the trenches for 16 solid years. Anyway, now that Metuh is insisting on standing up to be counted, he must first debunk the derisive jibes of the secretariat staff.  No punch could be deadlier than the insinuation by the staff that Metuh’s trajectory in the PDP “in 1999 as a zonal youth leader, then National Ex-officio, Acting National Auditor, Zonal Vice Chairman and now publicity secretary” suggests that, “either his umbilical cord was buried at Wadata Plaza or that he can’t survive on any other thing except the PDP.” This is not simply a joke carried too far but also one that the self-styled anti-corruption tsar within the PDP should not stomach. The law of equity demands no less. Will Metuh burst the pipe this time or would he wait for the usual under-the-table ‘family affairs’ crisis resolution mechanism to shut out the aggrieved workers’ complaints and thereby bury the rotten truth? We wait for time to unravel the question.

    Editor’s note: This piece, first published in August 8, 2015, becomes more relevant now that Metuh is presently telling the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission his role in the despicable $2.1m heist perpetuated by the Office of the former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki. It is a tragic twist of fate that Metuh is now the one to explain how N1.4bn found its way into the account of his private firm. Or could it be part of the money Dasuki had planned to kick off the presidential ambition Metuh glibly talked about?

  • EFCC gets court order to detain Metuh

    EFCC gets court order to detain Metuh

    A court yesterday approved Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) spokesman Olisa Metuh’s detention.

    Metuh was arrested on Tuesday in respect of investigation of about N1.4billion “suspicious” funds in an account of a company in which he has interest.

    About N400million meant for arms purchase from the Office of the National Security Adviser(ONSA) was paid into the account of Destra Investment Limited where Metuh has a high stake.

    The Economice and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) approached the Chief Magistrate’s Court in Wuse Zone 2 for an order to detain Metuh – about 30 hours after his arrest in Abuja.

    The EFCC said it decided to seek an order to remand Metuh because some of his accomplices are at large.

    It however did not name the accomplices who are  on the run.

    Moving the application at about 2.34pm, the EFCC counsel, Mr. C.O. Ugwu, said:  “Your Worship, we have a remand proceeding brought by way of ex parte motion pursuant to Section 293 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.

    “The application is supported by Form 8, which is the stipulated form for an application of this nature. It is of 16-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Junaid Saidu, a detective officer with EFCC.

    “We place reliance on the entirety of the deposition in the said affidavit, especially paragraphs 4-15. In a nutshell, we have brought this application because the investigation involved in this case is a bit complex and there are also persons reasonably suspected to be involved in the fraud who are yet at large.

    “We need the suspect in the custody so as to aid us in our investigation. So, we have come with this application to respectfully apply for an order of this Honourable Court authorising us to keep him in custody.

    “By the provision of Section 296(1) of the ACJ Act, Your Worship is enjoined to grant an application of this nature for a period of 14 days.

    “May I conclude my submission by referring this Honourable Court to the case of Lufadeju v. Jonhnson(2007) 8NWLR Pt 1037 at Page 535.

    “This is a case where the Supreme Court held that it is constitutional to detain a suspect so as to aid investigation and to ensure that the right of the suspect is protected.

    “This is because we have approached the court to justify his detention by operation of law. So, there is no way we can detain him unnecessarily since the court is in the picture.”

    Relying on sections 293 and 296 of the ACJ Act, the EFCC counsel pleaded with the court to allow the anti-graft agency to detain Metuh.

    Section 293 says: “A suspect arrested for an offence, which a magistrate’s court has no jurisdiction to try shall, within a reasonable time of arrest, be brought before a magistrate’s court for remand.

    “An application for remand under this section shall be made ex parte and shall (a) be made in the prescribed “Report and Request for Remand Form” as contained in Form 8, in the First Schedule to this Act; and (b) be verified on oath and contain reasons for the remand request.

    Section 296 reads in part: (1) “Where an order of remand of the suspect is made pursuant to Section 293 of this Act, the order shall be for a period not exceeding 14 days in the first instance, and the case shall be returnable within the same period.

    (2) “Where, on application in writing, good cause is shown why there should be an extension of the remand period, the court may make an order for further remand of the suspect for a period not exceeding 14 days and make the proceedings returnable within the same period…”

    In his ruling, Chief Magistrate Okeagu Azubuike said: “This court has read carefully the affidavit in the Form 8 to support this application as well as the legal  authorities submitted thereto.

    “This court has therefore found merit in this application and hereby allows the applicant to detain the respondent(Olisa Metuh) in their custody from the 6th of January to 13th of January, 2016, pending the investigation.

    “The Respondent(Olisa Metuh) should be given access to his lawyer, relatives and medical doctors and should be arraigned before a court of law on or before 13th of January.”

  • PDP chieftain carpets Metuh over comments

    PDP chieftain carpets Metuh over comments

    The administrative secretary of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in Anambra State under the leadership of Ejike Oguebego, Hon. Prince Ajulu has taken the National publicity secretary of the party, Chief Olisah Metuh, to the cleaners for his comments against the All Progressive Congress (APC).

    The PDP chieftain, who is a lawyer, accused Metuh of being afraid of his own shadow.

    Metuh, had on November 18, 2015 in a press conference at Abuja, claimed among other things that Nigerians are witnesses to the increasing muzzling of opposition by APC, using security force, judicial persecution.

    Also, he claimed that the party was using other devious means aimed at decimating PDP to pave way for the imposition of one party state all, according to him was in desperate bid to retain power in 2019.

    According to Ajulu; “I’m surprised that this same Olisah Metuh who is the brain behind the manipulation of judicial process in suit No: HIH/6/15, Ken Emeakayi vs PDP, illegally imposed him on Anambra.”

    He alleged that Metuh did such in also desperate bid to retain self in the National Working Committee (NWC) in 2016 as what he described as life member, adding that it surprised him that Metuh was talking about muzzling opposition.

    These were contained in a message sent to The Nation Monday and equally copied to the members of the national executive council (NEC) of the party.

    It was also copied to National Acting Chairman of the party Uche Secondus, Chairman, Board of Trustees (BoT) and members of the (NWC) of (PDP).

  • PDP asks AGF, INEC chairman to resign over Kogi poll

    PDP asks AGF, INEC chairman to resign over Kogi poll

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has asked the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Mallam Abubakar Malami and the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmud Yakubu, to resign their positions.

    According to the party, Malami misled the INEC into arriving at an “unconstitutional decision” to allow the All Progressives Congress (APC) to substitute its candidate in the inconclusive Kogi State governorship election.

    Briefing journalists in Abuja on Tuesday, PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, said the party was shocked that INEC, a supposedly independent electoral umpire could succumb to the antics of the APC by following the “unlawful directive” of an obviously partisan AGF to substitute a candidate in the middle of the ballot process.

    Metuh said, “We are all aware that the two legal documents guiding INEC in the conduct of elections; the Constitution and the Electoral Act, have provisions for electoral exigencies as well as empower the electoral body to fully take responsibility for any of its actions or inactions without undue interference from any quarters whatsoever.

    “We are therefore at a loss as to which sections of these two relevant laws, INEC and the AGF relied on in arriving at their bizarre decision to substitute a dead candidate in an on-going election even after the timelines for such has elapsed under all the rules.

    “INEC as a statutory body has the full complements of technical hands in its legal department to advice it appropriately and we wonder why it had to wait for directives from the AGF, an external party, if not for partisan and subjective interest.

    “Consequently, the PDP rejects in its entirety, this brazen move by the APC and INEC to circumvent the laws and ambush the yet-to-be concluded election by introducing a practice that is completely alien to the constitution and the electoral act.

    “The clear implication of this action of the AGF and INEC is that the APC would be fielding two different governorship candidates in the ongoing Kogi election, meaning that INEC would be transferring votes cast for late Prince Abubakar Audu to another candidate, scenarios that have no place in the constitution of the land.

    “Whereas the PDP, in honour of the sanctity of human life and respect for the dead, had since Sunday refrained from making comments on the conduct of the election, we can no longer maintain such in the face of the barefaced attack on our democracy.

    “This INEC under the leadership of Prof. Mahmood Yakubu has shown itself as partisan, morally bankrupt and obviously incapable of conducting a credible election within our laws.

    “In view of the foregoing therefore, the PDP demands an immediate resignation of the INEC Chairman, as the nation’s democracy cannot afford to be left in the hands of an electoral umpire that cannot exert its independence and the sanctity of the electoral process.”

    As a result of the development, the party has summoned an emergency national caucus meeting for Wednesday, to enable it take a decision on what it described as “threat to democracy.”

     

     

     

  • Lai Mohammed asks court to stop Metuh from making more libel

    Lai Mohammed asks court to stop Metuh from making more libel

    Former All Progressives Congress (APC) spokesman Lai Mohammed has asked a Lagos High Court sitting in Ikeja to stop the People Democratic Party (PDP) National Publicity Secretary, Olisa Metuh, from further publishing “libelous” statements against him.

    Mohammed, through his counsel, Wahab Shittu, prayed Justice Toyin Ipaye to grant his prayer as a matter of urgency.

    The Minister of Information had on October 12, 2015 filed a N500 million suit against Metuh before the court, alleging that the PDP spokesperson defamed him in a statement issued on September 20, 2015.

    He claimed that Metuh accused him of embezzling the funds meant for fencing of an airport in one of the APC-controlled states in the Southwest.

    Metuh was alleged to have accused Mohammed of having obtained money to supply ambulances to one APC-controlled state in the Southwest, but which he allegedly failed to supply.

    At the resumed hearing of the matter yesterday, Mohammed brought an application dated November 8, 2015, urging the court to “refrain the defendant, his agents, groups or associations from further publishing a libellous writing against the applicant pending the hearing of substantive suit”.

    “We need a stop gap of this court. The claimant is accused of corruption and embezzlement, meaning the claimant is a fraudster and an economic saboteur.

    “This is a claimant who has not been arraigned or found guilty of any corrupt practices and a legal practitioner of great standing. He is currently serving as Minister of Information.

    “The claimant’s legal right has been violated and is threatened by the defendant who seems to be on rampage. The defendant should be restrained from further publication of libellous statements,” Shittu posited.

    But Emeka Etiaba (SAN) counsel to Metuh urged the court to strike out or dismiss the application of applicant for incompetence.

    “The application was not served within five days and there are no facts supporting the alleged libellous statement against the claimant.

    “It was also not duly signed by the deponent, but the signature of the deponent was scanned…” Etiaba argued.

    The trial judge adjourned the matter till November 23 for ruling.

     

     

    END

     

     

  • Dokpesi’s apology remains his personal opinion – Metuh

    Dokpesi’s apology remains his personal opinion – Metuh

    National Publicity Secretary of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Olisa Metuh, said the apology credited to the party’s National Conference Committee Chairman, Chief Raymond Dokpesi, remained his personal opinion.

    Metuh made this remark when he spoke with newsmen in Abuja on Wednesday.

    He said Dokpesi’s statement did not in any way represent official position of the PDP, as he was not a member of the party’s National Executive Committee.

    Metuh said Dokpesi could only speak in his personal capacity adding that his opinion remains personal and did not represent that of the party

    On PDP’s choice to field former President Goodluck Jonathan in the 2015 presidential race, Metuh said the decision was approved by the party’s National Working Committee (NWC).

    He added that the decision was also approved by the party’s National Executive Council (NEC), and the party’s National Caucus.

    “In addition, the Constitution of the party allows a sitting president the chance to exercise his personal right to run for a second term if he so desires.’’

    On whether the party regretted its action, Metuh said: “how can you regret a decision taken when everyone was there, the NWC, NEC and the national caucus?

    “What are we talking about? Everybody was conscious of the decision; nobody was coerced into supporting the position.”

    He, however, said it was not the time for buck-passing or blame-game but time to collectively reposition the party.

    “We are repositioning our party. What we should do is to join hands to reposition PDP based on Sen. Ike Ekweremadu’s report to reclaim the party’s lost glory. This is what is expected of us all at this time’’, Metuh said.

    NAN recalls that Dokpesi had on Tuesday on behalf of the PDP apologised for mistakes it may have made during its 16 years rule in the country.

    Dokpesi admitted that the party might not have met all the expectations of Nigerians while it was in power and said: “on behalf of PDP, I tender our apologies.’’

    Dokpesi admitted that the party deviated from the dream of its founding fathers, adding that members operated without recourse to the rule of law.

    He added that the party, in 2010 and 2011, made the first fundamental mistake for not allowing the North to complete its term.

    He noted that special recommendations were made to allow former President Goodluck Jonathan to complete it.

  • Metuh and gains of judiciary under PDP

    As it is often said, no legitimate child deliberately sets his father’s house on fire. It is still inexplicable that those who for 16 years behaved as if they had no stakes in Nigeria are not remorseful. These men pillaged and plundered the land ‘materially and morally’ like colonial invaders. They shared our common patrimony through fraudulent privatisation and monetization policies. It made no difference to them that they were sharing what they did not build but what was built by visionary leaders. They introduced ‘political Sharia’; they unleashed Niger Delta militants and Boko Haram on Nigeria. They tamed Obasanjo who ended up squandering away with both hands, the goodwill of Nigerians and the international community he took into government in 1999. They hastened the death of ailing Yar’Adua. For about six years, they pushed naïve Jonathan around while shamelessly lying to Nigerians. The only decision Jonathan ever took as president was conceding defeat after losing the election without first consulting David Mark, Uche Secondus, Tony Anenih, Femi Fani-Kayode, the weeping Ifeanyi Ubah, errant Elder Orubebe, Pa Edwin Clark the President’s father and Olisa Metuh. Voted out of government by determined Nigerians, they still don’t think they owe Nigerians an apology.

    Last week, those who threatened Pa Bisi Akande with sedition for criticizing Jonathan’s government forgot that the law is still in our statute books.  Without remorse, they now again threaten to unleash Niger Delta militants on Nigeria because an election tribunal nullified an election described by local and international observers as ‘war’. According to Olisa Metuh and Wale Oladipo, “PDP is not willing to and will never surrender the mandate freely given to us by the people in states where we won in the last general election, neither are the people of those states willing to allow sectional invaders to exert influence on those to be in charge of their affairs”. That, after a court’s verdict, is a call for insurrection.

    After a vicious attack on the President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, they accused President Buhari without proof of ‘undue interferences’ in the activities of the judiciary using the Department of States Service (DSS). This they say, threaten the 16 years ‘gains of the judiciary’ without defining what constituted ‘gains of judiciary under PDP. Fortunately, Joseph Jibueze, a very resourceful reporter, in a piece titled ‘How sabotage, blackmail, undue delays are killing the Judiciary’ listed some of the legacies of the judiciary between 1999-and 2014 to fill the gap. They include such cases as those of Ayo Fayose whose  trial for alleged financial misappropriation as a former  governor had dragged on for eight years before winning a controversial election in 2014 even while  facing eligibility case in court. In a bid to stop the case from being heard, Fayose unleashed thugs on judges, lawyers, and court officials. According to Justice Daramola, the Ekiti State Chief Judge: “The thugs invaded my court…tore the Record Books, beat the court officials…descended on Hon. Justice J. A. Adeyeye, the presiding Judge in Court No. 3, beat and dragged him on the ground”. After inauguration, Abuja kept its peace while Fayose with the help of thugs chased out 19 opposition lawmakers out of town and ruled like a garrison commander with seven PDP legislators.

    Another ‘gain’ of the judiciary Metuh probably had in mind was the Halliburton case. While the company officials indicted for bribing Nigerian officials were jailed after conviction in the US, Nigerians indicted for receiving the bribes walked away free. Although they did not mention it, but one can help PDP add as parts of ‘gains’ of the judiciary the Ibori case. Accused of stealing US$250million from the public purse, he pleaded to 10 counts of money laundering and conspiracy to defraud, and was sentenced  to 13 years on April 17, 2012, by the Southwark Crown Court in London .That was after the 171-count charge of money laundering, fraud and corruption filed against Ibori at the Federal High Court, Kaduna was discontinued in his favour by the Court  of Appeal that  held ‘his trial in Kaduna was illegal as the alleged crime was committed in Delta’ and was discharged and acquitted by Justice Marcel Awokulehin, when he was eventually arraigned in Asaba.

    While the trial of Erastus Akingbola, former owner of Intercontinental Bank has dragged on for five years due to conspiracy of judges and SANs, a civil suit instituted against him in a British court by Access Bank Plc has been disposed of by ‘a London, court which ordered Akingbola to pay the bank £654million allegedly diverted from the bank illegally’ in August 2012. Also listed as a possible ‘gain’ was the case of Bukola Saraki v. Inspector-General of Police (Unreported Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/231/2012), where Saraki  sought to restrain the Special Fraud Unit (SFU) of the Nigeria Police Force from  investigating an allegation of N9 billion fraud leveled against him. After reporting for investigation, Saraki filed a fresh suit seeking to stop the police from prosecuting him. He got the relief. The case of ex-Governor Peter Odili of Rivers State is similar. In March 2007, he secured a Federal High Court injunction restraining the EFCC from investigating his tenure.  Justice Ibrahim Buba gave an order that the EFCC had no power to “in any manner howsoever, investigate the account or financial affairs of a state government.”

    We can also add Dariye’s case whose British associates were jailed in London for laundering more than £1.4million of public funds found to have allegedly been stolen by the governor. Dariye in spite of EFCC 14-count charge for money laundering went on to win an election as a senator.

    In the Mohammed Abacha case numbered SC.40/2006 Minister of Justice, Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN), simply ordered the withdrawal of the N446.3billion theft charge instituted against him to pave the way for him to contest as PDP governorship candidate for Kano.

    Again, we cannot blame Metuh and his PDP colleagues for describing all the above baleful legacies as ‘gains’. The judiciary has not changed much over the years. Because of the dishonesty and greed of its leading lights before independence, it backed the colonial masters’ grabbing of Lagos choice lands hiding under the treaty of cession of 1861 until Herbert Macaulay’s appeal on behalf of Chief Oluwa and the Eleko’s to the British Judicial Council in London was upheld in 1913. For the same reasons, S. L. Akintola’s Supreme Court 1962 victory was overturned by the British judicial council which ruled he was constitutionally removed.

    In 1966, because of dishonesty and greed, senior members of the judiciary advised Ironsi to take over the reins of power instead of swearing in Zanna Bukar Dipcharima, the next most senior minister as acting  Prime Minister as provided for in our constitution. Similarly driven by nothing but dishonesty and greed, senior members of the judiciary, who knew the implication of turning a heterogeneous society from a federal to a unitary state drafted for Ironsi Decree 34 of 1966 that sparked off rioting by ABU students that inexorably led to the mindless killing of innocent Nigerians. For the same reasons, leading lights of the judiciary helped Babangida  with his illegal interim decree after annulling the most credible election in our nation’s history.

    But how do we tame the greedy and dishonest senior members of our judiciary? I think there is something to learn from Metuh’s lamentation over the modest achievement of the DSS in the last few months following the removal of PDP infiltrators. It only shows that devoid of political interference, the DSS has the capacity to cage senior members of the judiciary who have turned it to cash and carry enterprise, turned politics to a noble profession that places emphasis on service to a game of brigands, and provider of legal cover to criminals in government houses.

  • ‘Call Metuh, PDP to order’

    ‘Call Metuh, PDP to order’

    A GROUP, Governance Watch Initiative (GWI), has expressed shock at a statement attributed to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) spokesman, Chief Olisa Metuh.

    GWI said Metuh, in his statement, allegedly tried to instigate PDP members and supporters to rise up  against President Muhammadu Buhari administration and the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Urging the citizenry to call Metuh and the PDP to order, GWI’s National Coordinator Rotimi Ogunwuyi, in a statement yesterday, said: “We are horrified that a party that was until six months ago the ruling party in our country, and one that was in control of 27 states at a certain time, could so brazenly  seek to instigate anarchy in the country simply because a duly constituted tribunal  upturned the governorship election in Rivers State.

    “We have also noticed a series of unwarranted attacks against our nation’s judiciary by  Metuh and his party, an attack that was carried to a disturbing level in Sunday’s  statement.

    “We recall that when Chibuike Amaechi, then of the PDP, was pronounced as the governor  of Rivers State by the Supreme Court in October 2007, even when he did not contest that year’s governorship election since his name had been substituted by his party, the PDP did not think the judiciary was being used by the PDP-led Federal Government of the time.

    “We also recall that under the present dispensation, all the APC National Assembly candidates  in Rivers, who took their cases to the election petition tribunal, lost and heavens did not fall.

    ‘’We note that Metuh has always been quick to say that his party will provide a credible  opposition, and wonder what is credible in the kind of subversive statements that have been emanating from the PDP spokesman in recent times.”

    The group said if Metuh and his party believed in the rule of law, as they have often trumpeted, they would have realised that it was better to appeal any judgment they did not like than to threaten to bring the country crashing down.

  • PDP mocks APC candidates for Kogi, Bayelsa polls

    PDP mocks APC candidates for Kogi, Bayelsa polls

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has resorted to mocking the candidates of the All Progressives Congress (APC) for Kogi and Bayelsa states in the upcoming governorship election in the two states.

    In a statement issued on Monday by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, the PDP called on Nigerians to note the “corruption credentials” of the two APC candidates.

    A former governor of Kogi State, Prince Abubakar Audu and another former governor of Bayelsa State, Chief Timipre Sylva, are the APC candidates for the elections, slated for November 21 and December 5 respectively.

    The PDP described as “shameful irony and display of crass hypocrisy,” the fact that a ruling party that prides itself as an anti-corruption crusader, would field candidates being held on corruption charges, saying such has further exposed the insincerity of the APC.

    The statement said, “It is a mockery of strategy that the APC which has been touting the fight against corruption as its major policy, would present to the people of the two states, candidates whose public questionable credentials are further evidenced in the charges brought against them by anti-graft agencies.

    “In Kogi, we have the APC brazenly fielding, for the November 21 governorship election, Prince Abubakar Audu, a former governor of the state that was declared wanted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for corruption, and who is now facing charges before the court, of breach of trust, embezzling and misappropriating the sum of N10.9 billion meant for the development of his state.

    “In the same vein, in Bayelsa State, the APC is fielding, for the December 5 election, Chief Timipre Sylva, also a former governor of the state, who is similarly before the court on charges of embezzlement of a staggering sum of N19.2 billion belonging to Bayelsa State.

    “This APC candidate in Bayelsa is being charged by the EFCC for embezzling funds meant for state workers for a period four years, ‘under false pretence’ of using the funds to augment their salaries.

    “Now that the APC is brazenly fielding candidates with questions of corruption, we ask, do they in all honesty expect Nigerians to take them seriously on their much-hyped anti-corruption crusade?

    “Does the APC expect the people of Kogi and Bayelsa States to be fooled into voting for the same individuals who are facing charges of looting funds meant for the development of their respective states?”

  • Ministerial list nothing to be excited about -PDP

    Ministerial list nothing to be excited about -PDP

    The Peoples Democratic Party on Tuesday said there is nothing to be excited about the list of ministerial nominees sent to the Senate by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    “By a mere look at the list, one can tell that there is nothing to be excited about, especially considering the length of time it took the President to come up with it,” the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, said in a statement.

    “Looking at the list, it is hard to put a finger on why it should take any serious-minded and focused government six months after its election to assemble such a regular team.

    “The list and the length of time it took have further confirmed the fact that the APC-led administration is driven by propaganda and deceit, a development that raises doubts on the sincerity of its anti-corruption crusade,” the party added.