Tag: Murtala Nyako

  • EFCC grills ex-Adamawa Deputy Governor

    EFCC grills ex-Adamawa Deputy Governor

    • May declare Nyako wanted
    •Agency defreeze state accounts

    For about three hours yesterday, operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) grilled former Adamawa State Deputy Governor Bala Ngillari on alleged mismanagement of funds during the administration of sacked Governor Murtala Nyako.

    The EFCC said it might declare Nyako wanted as it had been difficult to serve the ex-governor a letter of invitation.

    The anti-graft agency said it had defreezed the state’s accounts to enable the administration of Acting Governor Umaru Fintiri to take off smoothly.

    A source said Ngillari arrived at the commission at 10am and left few minutes past 1pm.

    The source said Ngilari was questioned on his security votes and his role in the alleged misappropriation of funds.

    Nyako was indicted by a seven-man investigation panel headed by Buba Kaigama.

    Of the 20 allegations, the House of Assembly found Nyako ‘guilty’ of 16 before impeaching him on July 15.

    Some of the allegations were alleged diversion of N2.3billion meant for workers’ salaries; illegal diversion of N1billion earmarked for the State Scholarship Trust Fund; diversion of N142million emoluments of workers; fraudulent award of contracts of N8billion, among others.

    The source said: “Ngilari was invited in respect of security votes and what he knew about the mismanagement of funds during Nyako’s tenure.

    “The former deputy governor made a statement and responded to questions on how the Nyako administration was managed.

    “But he was asked to go after three hours. The EFCC will still invite Ngillari for more quizzing soon. For now, we can say that he is on administrative bail.

    “Without Nyako coming for questioning, we cannot clear Ngillari at all. This is why the former deputy governor will be re-invited.”

    The EFCC said it might declare Nyako wanted, unless he makes himself available for questioning.

    EFCC’s Head of Media and Publicity Wilson Uwujaren said: “We have tried to serve him a notice of invitation but we cannot trace him. Our operatives went to all Nyako’s known addresses but they could not locate him.

    “We advise Nyako to come to the EFCC or else we will have no option than to declare him wanted.”

  • Gloating in Adamawa

    If there was any lingering doubt about the identities of the power-hungry schemers, who determined the untidy removal of the former Adamawa State Governor, Murtala Nyako, it was certainly laid to rest by the triumphalism of the former Speaker of the House of Assembly and Acting Governor, Umaru Fintiri.

    The Acting Governor’s fourth day in office was dramatically and significantly marked by a revealing closed-door meeting he had with some high-profile officials of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Abuja. There was no question about his gloating as he spoke with reporters afterwards.  “As a loyal and obedient party member,” he said, “I came on a courtesy call to my party and the National Working Committee as my first assignment after the battle to remove Governor Nyako who had stolen the mandate of the PDP under which he was elected.”  Fintiri added: “I came here to bring back the mandate and I have handed over to them the mandate. I promise that I will work together with the party, its leadership and the people of Adamawa to ensure that our party is restored to the people.”

    A content analysis of Fintiri’s remarks indicates that Nyako’s impeachment and subsequent removal were most likely inspired more by his defection from the PDP to the rival All Progressives Congress (APC) than by his alleged “gross misconduct.”  This reasoning, of course, is based on the fact that the definition of the critical phrase should not reasonably include an individual’s voluntary movement from one party to another. In other words, irrespective of the veracity or invalidity of the charges against Nyako, the mission of the apparently teleguided legislators was to get rid of him by all means, including nauseatingly indecent and dishonourable methods, not to say legally-deficient processes.

    It is worth observing that the accusations that fuelled the eventual removal of Nyako were not unveiled while he remained a member of the PDP, but were suddenly unearthed after his exit from the party. To a large extent, this fact colours the allegations even if they could be proved; and the conveniently delayed pursuit of punishment is itself a strong indictment of the integrity of the self-righteous accusers.

    Expectedly, the PDP National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, echoed Fintiri’s remarks, and was quoted as saying that the treatment Nyako got would restore the party’s dignity and roll back the rot caused by him.  Metuh’s choice of words is amazing because it suggests that he may not be conscious of the meaning they convey.  If undignified conduct is seen as having restored the party’s dignity, it is food for thought and should prompt a deeper examination, even a questioning, of the party’s values. Also, speaking of rot, what could be more rotten than the celebration of evil, which this big excitement represents?

    Regrettably, this episode has once again demonstrated that the politically- powerful in the country are usually less guided by the spirit of the law and often more interested in how they can manipulate the letter of the law for narrow and short-sighted self-aggrandisement.

     

  • Momoh: Nyako’ll return to Govt House

    Momoh: Nyako’ll return to Govt House

    Former Minister of Information Prince Tony Momoh has said impeached Adamawa State Governor Murtala Nyako will return to the Government House.

    Momoh said the impeachment of opposition governors is to weaken the All Progressives Congress (APC) in next year’s election.

    He told The Nation that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) had arrived at the conclusion that the best way to confront the APC is decimate the party by impeaching the governors.

    Momoh said: “The way to confront the APC is by destabilising, undermining and destroying it. That is the strategy, and PDP has started doing it. They did it with Adamawa State; they have started it with Nasarawa State.”

    The former minister said Nyako was only out temporarily.

    “Impeachment is a very serious step taken by the legislators, who are supposed to represent the people. When they take that step, then the person who is elected by the people leaves office.

    “So, the procedure for removal must be very thorough and we know that the Adamawa procedure was not thorough. So, I can assure you that the Adamawa State governor is only out temporarily, he will return.

    “Look at what is happening in Nasarawa, the Nasarawa scenario is step to the battle line being drawn. The people who elected the governor say they don’t want him out. So, look at what we are trying to do to ourselves because of greed of power.

    “The reaction that is coming from the people may even lead to a revolution, where due process is undermined because of the greed of power. The presence of APC has established a balance of power, this makes the PDP jittery,” he said.

    He warned the political class of the dire consequence of undermining the democracy which they fought hard to achieve. “Nobody should push issues to distract the state to a situation where there will be the balance of terror.”

  • Jonathan meets Adamawa acting Governor

    Jonathan meets Adamawa acting Governor

    President Goodluck Jonathan on Monday met behind closed doors with the Adamawa State Acting Governor, Ahmadu Fintri, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Speaking with State House correspondents at the end of the meeting, the Acting governor said he was at the Villa to see the President as the leader of the country in order to give him the details of situation in Adamawa State.

    He denied the allegation that members of the state House of Assembly were given money to remove Governor Murtala Nyako.

    He said: “Who gave the money? There must be an evidence of the person who gave the money. In this country, people are used to whatever situation that happened, it is about money. Who gave the money?”

    On whether Nyako was removed to retrieve Peoples Democratic Party’s mandate in the state, he said: “You saw the allegations and they have been proven by the panel, so that cannot be the reason why we removed the man. There were even so many other issues that we could not bring as part of the allegations that formed his removal.”

    “But definitely as a PDP man that has taken over as acting governor in Adamawa State, I have to say that I brought back to my party the stolen mandate by the former governor.”

    Asked to speak on the allegation that the President was trying to muscle the opposition by way of impeachment, he said: “Nyako is not an opposition man. He only stole the mandate of the PDP into the APC. How did the President get involved in this local issue in Adamawa? The man has stolen our money. That is the bottom line of it.”

    He also said that he didn’t know if Nyako is on the run.

    On the present situation in Adamawa, he said: “Adamawa is fine, Adamawa is calm. We are into confidence building, having removed Nyako and the destruction of infrastructure and moral of our people.”

     

  • Niger Delta group optimistic court will upturn Nyako’s impeachment

    Niger Delta group optimistic court will upturn Nyako’s impeachment

    Niger Delta-based group, the Centre for the Vulnerable and the Underprivileged (CENTREP) was confident yesterday that the court would reverse the impeachment of the former governor of Adamawa State, Murtala Nyako.

    The group’s Executive Director, Mr. Oghenejabor Ikimi, described the entire process that led to Nyako’s impeachment as faulty and a product of a militarised democracy.

    Ikimi, a lawyer, advised the former governor not to relent in his decision to seek redress for the wrong done him by the lawmakers.

    Explaining further, Ikimi said: “We are aware that Governor Nyako was never served personally with any impeachment notice by the Clerk of the Adamawa House of Assembly.

    “The Acting Chief Judge of the State and the seven-man panel that investigated all the charges leveled against Governor Nyako and his deputy was giving military cover throughout the impeachment process.

    “The impeachment was evidently stage-managed by the Presidency as the entire proces s was a case of the voice of Jacob and the hands of Esau.

    “We call on all Nigerians to stand up to condemn this dangerous brand of democracy being smuggled into our polity by political marauders as same could spell doom to our fledgling democracy”, he stressed.

  • Nyako vows to fight his impeachment in court

    Nyako vows to fight his impeachment in court

    Speaker sworn in as acting governor

    Governors, Saraki, Atiku, Balarabe, condemn action 

    An acting governor mounted the saddle yesterday in Adamawa State after Governor Murtala Nyako’s controversial impeachment.

    Speaker Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri took the oath of office in Yola, the state capital, at a hurriedly organised ceremony witnessed by Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chieftains.

    Lawmakers impeached Nyako shortly after the “hawks” in the ruling PDP forced Deputy Governor Bala Ngilari to resign.

    There were plans to arrest Nyako, who was said to have left Yola late Monday.

    After deliberating on the report of the Investigative Panel headed by Buba Kaigama, 18 of the 25 members of the Assembly opted to remove Nyako.

    The Assembly actually needed the consent of 17 members to remove the governor.

    Shortly after the impeachment, the Assembly wrote the acting Chief Judge of the state to inaugurate Speaker Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri as the acting governor.

    The letter, signed by the Clerk of the House, Francis Gbanisenso, reads: “The Honourable House during its sitting on Tuesday, 15th July 2014 resolved and directed you to swear in the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri as the Acting Governor of Adamawa State today 15th day of July 2014.

    “This is in pursuant to Section 191(1) and (2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999(As Amended).”

    According to sources, PDP leaders in the state opted for “arm-twisting” when they discovered that they could not initially secure the majority to remove Nyako.

    But to push the impeachment proceeding through, the “hawks” prevailed on Ngilari to resign.

    A source said: “The resignation of Ngilari was the joker which was used to convince pro-Nyako lawmakers that the game was up.

    “Those against Nyako queried the rationale of leaving the governor untouched when the deputy has quit.

    “The game-plan is to compensate Ngilari with a juicy appointment.”

    Ngilari wrote: “Pursuant to Section 306(5) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (As Amended), I kindly notify you of my resignation from the office of the Deputy Governor of Adamawa State forthwith on personal grounds.

    “I want to thank you immensely for the opportunity to serve Adamawa State and wish you and the good people of the state well in the remaining period of your administration.”

    It was gathered that to intimidate the Assembly members, those against Nyako in the Presidency mobilised troops, policemen and security agents to Yola.

    The National Vice Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) for the Northeast, Mr. Babachir David Lawal, described Nyako’s impeachment as “illegal”.

    Lawal said: “The whole process was characterized by a litany of illegalities. The constitution requires a direct service of impeachment notice on the governor and this was not done by the House of Assembly. The Assembly opted for substituted service but the Supreme Court has ruled that such a notice must be personally served.

    “But we know we are dealing with people who have no respect for law; we are dealing with members of the House of Assembly who have no respect for the constitution they have sworn to obey.

    “They are doing this because they have the assurances of their sponsors in Abuja that whatever illegalities they committed, they would assist them to sustain it.”

    The Assembly raised a seven-man panel to probe Nyako and Ngilari.

    Members of the panel, led by Buba Kaigama (Mubi Northern Zone), were Laraba Hassan (Michika Northern Zone), Njidda Kito (Song Central Zone), Joshua Abu (Hong Central Zone), Binanu Esthon (Guyuk Southern Zone), Sa’ad Lawan (Mayo-Belwa Southern Zone) and Esthon Gapsiso (Genye Southern Zone)

    The provision for the removal of a governor and his deputy is contained in Section 188 (1-11) of the 1999 Constitution.

    The section states: “A motion of the House of Assembly that the allegation be investigated shall not be declared as having been passed unless it is supported by the votes of not less than two-thirds majority of all the members of the House of Assembly.

    “Within seven days of the passing of a motion under the foregoing provisions of this section, the Chief Judge of the State shall at the request of the Speaker of the House of Assembly, appoint a Panel of seven persons who in his opinion are of unquestionable integrity, not being members of any public service, legislative house or political party, investigate the allegation as provided in this section.

    “The holder of an office whose conduct is being investigated under this section shall have the right to defend himself in person or be represented before the Panel by a legal practitioner of his own choice.

    “A panel appointed under this section shall (a) have such powers and exercise its functions in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by the House of Assembly; and (b) within three months of its appointment, reports its findings to the House of Assembly.

    “Where the Panel reports to the House of Assembly that the allegation has not been proved, no further proceedings shall be taken in respect of the matter.

    “Where the report of the Panel is that the allegation against the holder of the Office has been proved, then within 14 days of the receipt of the report, the House of Assembly shall consider the report, and if by a resolution of the House of Assembly supported by not less, than two-thirds majority of all its members, the report of the Panel is adopted; then the holder of the office shall stand removed from office as from the date of the adoption of the report.

    “No proceedings or determination of the Panel or of the House of Assembly or any matter relating to such proceedings or determination shall be entertained or questioned in any court.

    “In this section, ‘gross misconduct’ means a grave violation or breach of the provisions of this Constitution or a misconduct of such nature as amounts in the opinion in the House of Assembly to gross misconduct.”

     

  • Nyako recommended Umaru for deputy before removal

    Nyako recommended Umaru for deputy before removal

    Impeached Governor Murtala Nyako remained defiant till the end yesterday. He appointed Hon. Adamu Kamale as deputy governor.

    Nyako wrote the Speaker of the House of Assembly, Ahmadu Umaru before the Assembly removed him from office.

    The letter was in response to Nyako’s former Deputy Governor Bala Ngilari’s resignation.

    Dated 15, July, 2014, the letter notified the Speaker as follows: “Pursuant to Section 191(3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and the powers vested in me as Governor of Adamawa State, I hereby nominate Honourable Adamu Kamale as my Deputy Governor to replace Hon. Bala Ngilari who resigned this morning (Tuesday’s).

    “Please accept the assurances of my highest regards and esteem.”

    Ngilari resigned to stave off impeachment.

    In his July 15, 2014 letter referenced as DGO/GHY/PER/60/75, Ngilari said: “Pursuant to Section 306(5) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (As Amended), I kindly notify you of my resignation from the office of the Deputy Governor of Adamawa State forthwith on personal grounds.

    “I want to thank you immensely for the opportunity to serve Adamawa State and wish you and the good people of the state well in the remaining period of your administration.”

    Nyako’s security aides were withdrawn at about 1pm shortly after his impeachment.

    These included the Aide-de-Camp, the Chief Security Officer, State Security Service (SSS) details and policemen in pilot vehicles.

    Although a new set of security agents was deployed to arrest Nyako, who was in his Asokoro, Abuja have at the time of the controversial impeachment, the team could not locate his whereabouts.

    A source close to the governor said: “Some plain-clothe security agents came to look for Nyako but he had left his Asokoro residence.

    “These agents were looking so desperate to effect his arrest in connection with a letter he wrote to President Goodluck Jonathan on the security situation in the North, especially Northeast.

    “The plot is to arrest him and arraign him for sedition.”

    Asked of the governor’s  whereabouts, the source said: “Only God and his family could tell now.

    “We even learnt that if they cannot locate him, they might declare him wanted. Nyako is a military man; he would only insist on due legal process, even if he has to face trial.”

  • Jonathan begins ‘gunboat democracy’

    Jonathan begins ‘gunboat democracy’

    The hasty impeachment of Governor Murtala Nyako of Adamawa State, a ferocious critic of the Goodluck Jonathan presidency, presents Nigerians a terrible dilemma. On the one hand is the fact that some of the governors, including those who are candidates for impeachment, are difficult to defend on account of the misrule alleged against them by the electorate through their lawmakers. On the other hand is the fact that Nigerians also know that the Goodluck Jonathan presidency is believed to be covertly manipulating the impeachment processes for malevolent political ends. If the Fourth Republic is not to be endangered, the electorate and their legislators will have to do a delicate balancing act to separate reality from illusion, and distil truth from falsehood. The outcome is, however, by no means certain.

    Governor Nyako, who defected to the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) with four other Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors last year, was impeached yesterday in a process that lasted barely one week. It is feared in opposition ranks that his impeachment presages similar plans deliberately aimed at a number of vulnerable APC states, including Nasarawa – which is ongoing – Rivers, Edo and Kano, among others. The impeachment drive is presented to the unwary public either as punishment for executive malfeasances or strictly local politics in which the presidency has no hand, but only passing and amusing interest.

    To the wary, however, the reality is much more troubling. Not only is the impeachment weapon emblematic of brute presidential power to whip erring governors into line, especially if they are vulnerable, they are also part of an overall strategy to secure re-election for Dr Jonathan. In order to guarantee a second term, the president’s strategists estimate that a few APC states, especially those previously under PDP control, will have to be reclaimed before the next general elections, and if possible, before he throws his hat into the ring a second time. A previously quiescent Nasarawa State, with a legislature controlled by the PDP, has begun the process of impeaching its governor. Like Adamawa’s Governor Nyako, who was removed post-haste in spite of his aides enacting a series of fancy but tortuous footwork, Governor Tanko Al-Makura of the APC is not expected to survive the ordeal.

    Other than through impeachment, there is no other way the president and the ruling party can achieve favourable political dynamics for the 2015 polls, for they are tarred with the same brush as the governors they seek to unhorse. Were Adamawa and Nasarawa to be left in the hands of the APC, especially in the face of the superior electoral votes the APC potentially retained until last week, party strategists calculate that Dr Jonathan would face an uphill task in securing a second term in office. With Adamawa gone, and Nasarawa expected to follow, amidst the domino effect of a few other opposition states falling into the PDP column, the president’s re-election chances are believed to be much brighter than they were until last week.

    More importantly, after having suffered a number of reverses in the past one year, among which were the defections of five governors and scores of national lawmakers, the ruling party may have finally determined that the president must bare his fangs brutally and ruthlessly in order to make electorally safe states even much safer for him, and unsafe states to suffer acute trepidation. If he couldn’t attract defectors, his strategists reason, he must at least not tolerate deserters or let them off lightly. All options were put on the table, not minding whether they were extralegal or unconstitutional measures. In their calculations, they banked on the indifference of voters, their ignorance, and to some extent, their cowardice. So far, the Jonathan presidency and the PDP have not been disappointed.

    The Nigerian presidency is one of the most powerful in the world, suffused as it is with wide-ranging powers and domineering excesses. This is not simply because of constitutional provisions that nourish the president’s appetite to deploy power tyrannically, but also because of other cultural factors that manifest principally in traditional subservience to authority. Since institutions here are either weak or susceptible to inducement, presidential powers, much more than what the constitution envisages, become even more pronounced and counterproductive.

    It is not clear beyond speculations just how many states the president and his party intend to undermine, though nearly all the states suffer from either incompetent executives or misrule. But if the opposition required to check them is not urgently mustered, there may be no end to the subversion of opposition states until the country falls under the iron grip of the president. The moment Ekiti State was won by the PDP in the June poll, the party’s frenzied plan to rein in other states switched into high gear. Unfortunately, the electorate, elite, media and even civil society organisations largely appear to believe that the problem is essentially that of the opposition, especially the APC, to tackle. This is not only short-sighted; it is criminal negligence.

    It is time the electorate began to ask questions about the pattern of impeachment obviously orchestrated by the Jonathan presidency. In spite of the noticeable shortcomings in the administration of Adamawa State, the impeachment processes activated in that state and Nasarawa are not quite the local affair the PDP has tried to paint them. The motives of impeachment, which are designed to create favourable dynamics for the PDP in those states and many other states in next year’s polls, show a cynical disregard for the constitution and due process. If you must impeach, by all means do it decently and procedurally in order to lay a good precedent for future governments. More portentously, the continuing subversion of a few more opposition states both endangers democracy and lays the groundwork for totalitarianism.

    Since he became president, Dr Jonathan has himself enacted a string of unconstitutional and impeachable offences. He has subverted the judiciary, muzzled the press, albeit briefly, perhaps as dress rehearsal for 2015, inducted security agencies into partisanship, serially violated the constitution, propped up and canonised miscreants as a counterpoise to existing authorities in states, and generally constituted himself and his presidency as the most divisive in the nations’ history. But in spite of these flagrant violations, the people have indulgently overlooked the infractions of his government and glossed over his abuse and misuse of power.

    Considering how indifferent Nigerians are to the Jonathan government’s loathing for constitutionality, they may wake up one morning, like Germans did in the 1930s, to discover that the democracy they fought for under the military has either disappeared or has been seriously abridged and distorted. A culture of brazenness and arbitrariness is already taking root. And that culture is fed by the undignified and petty squabbles among the political elite. Political parties can have ideological and policy differences, and can punish erring executives and other officials of government. But to mask personal hatred for opposition parties and their leaders under partisanship, while also encouraging unlawful use of power, will doom democracy, enthrone dictatorship, and may also bring many of Dr Jonathan’s supporters, if not the president himself, to ruin. The French reign of terror should instruct those willing to learn from history. For there is always no guarantee that the proponent of terror today will not end up as victim tomorrow, or that those who remain silent today will have anyone speaking up for them tomorrow.

    Voters can of course theoretically punish the president and the PDP in 2015 no matter what the latter do to demean the constitution and secure a second term, but there is neither firm indication nor proof that any such punishment would be carried out or be contemplated. More worrisomely, there is no proof that whatever anyone does now would cause the president to moderate his overenthusiastic use of power. The clear fact is that going by the president’s wilful subversion of the constitution, there is nothing to suggest that either he or his party has lofty notions of what democracy is all about, nor a vision of where the country should be or aspire to be now or in the future. Yet, the country cannot afford to succumb to fatalism. Even if the country is unable to grasp the dangers ahead of it, partly because of ignorance and docility, the opposition must take on the onerous responsibility of defending and promoting Nigerian democracy.

    But to do that, the opposition must itself be above suspicion. Indeed, it is precisely in the worst of times that the opposition can best flourish. They can anchor their campaign for political rectitude on two fundamental grounds. First, since Nigerians cherish their democracy, with all its imperfections, the opposition can show the Jonathan government in its worst colours as an oppressive and incompetent government determined to doom the Fourth Republic. The Jonathan government can be shown as cynical haters of the constitution for the countless number of constitutional provisions it has broken. It can be painted as abusers of institutions for its manipulation of the judiciary and loathing for press freedom. And it can be denounced for its brinkmanship in re-introducing the military into politics, an institution just slowly emerging from the rancour and divisiveness that manifested in its ranks under military rule. A sustained campaign using examples from history, including the First Republic, should help to discourage further abuse and vote into office a party that respects, defends and promotes the constitution.

    Second, the Jonathan government is vulnerable in policy formulation and execution. Given the parlous state of the economy, the worsening human development indices and the state of social and cultural decay, it is not surprising that the Jonathan presidency has sought to atone for its shortcomings by a most disingenuous and ruthless use of extra-constitutional measures. It is precisely at this point that the opposition can best mobilise the electorate by deploying persuasive and credible information about the harm the ruling party in all of its about 16 years in office has inflicted on everyone. More importantly, the opposition should draw the attention of the public to the fact that the Jonathan presidency is reluctant to campaign on programmes or achievements, but relies on the brutal manipulation of political forces and dynamics in many states, and the use of divisive ethnic (minority v. majority) and religious politics.

    Crucially, the opposition must paint a vivid picture of what four more years of Dr Jonathan would mean for democracy, societal cohesion and security, economic progress, and religious harmony. There is no question what great harm the Jonathan government is doing to democracy and good governance, especially the impeachment processes it appears to be inspiring for ulterior reasons. However, the greatest challenge the opposition will face in seeking redress is how to clean up its own politics and methods. It welcomed all-comers to its fold during the giddy months of defections, some of them already liabilities to their constituencies; how then does it summon the puritanical zeal to present itself as champions of the new politics the country desires so badly? In other words, the opposition must repackage itself before it can sell itself and programmes to an electorate already alienated from and tormented by the Jonathan government.

    It is, indeed, at this point the electorate must wade in strongly to help set the right priorities for their leaders and the led alike. The agonising option they must contend with is whether to ignore the rampage inspired by Dr Jonathan, his gunboat democracy, because his victims have a sullied past; or to compel him to justly use his powers as well as honour the oath he took to defend and protect the constitution. That oath is obviously not being kept, thereby making him not only a hater of democracy as a whole, but a promoter of instability.

     

  • Nyako’s travails… From genesis to revelation

    Nyako’s travails… From genesis to revelation

    The impeachment of Adamawa State Governor Murtala Nyako underscores the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s agenda to emasculate the opposition party, ahead of next year’s general elections, writes Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU

    He had a premonition of the tragedy. Yet, the governor could not avert it. The handwriting was bold on the wall. But, little did he guess that the House of Assembly would complete the impeachment process with speed. After two weeks of anxiety in Adamawa State, the hammer fell on Governor Murtala Nyako yesterday. He was removed from office by 18 of the 25 members of the House of Assembly. The impeachment, according to observers, may have created a hollow in his political career.

    But, his deputy, Bala Ngilari, a lawyer, was spared by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) legislators, which gave him a soft landing. Faced with options of impeachment and resignation, he swiftly embraced the latter to avoid disgrace.

    Since he defected from the PDP to the All Progressives Congress (APC), Nyako has been in the eyes of the storm. His foes have been plotting his downfall. Indeed, the forces against him were formidable. Apart from the legislators, prominent politicians who supported the plot include the former PDP National Chairman Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, his son, Awwal, former Lagos State military Governor Buba Marwa, former Education Minister Senator Jibril Aminu, former Adawawa State Governor Boni Haruna, former Minister of State for Health Dr. Idi Song, former presidential Political Adviser Ahmed Gulag, PDP elder Joel Madaki and governorship aspirant Makus Gundiri.

    The motivation, said a source, was provided by the Presidency. The aggrieved PDP leaders were united against Nyako’s continuity in office for two reasons. The first is to weaken the APC and decimate its Governors’ Forum. Nyako is a vocal member of this forum that has given President Goodluck Jonathan sleepless nights. The second is to punish him for his shift of political allegiance. When the lawmakers issued an impeachment notice, it was evident that they were acting the scripts written in Abuja. The impeached governor’s ordeal may not be over. Outside office, he may become a victim of witch-hunting. The new governor may beam a searchlight on his administration and push for his prosecution.

    Nyako clearly understood his plight, limitationS and threat to his political career. He is a retired soldier, former military governor and member of the highest ruling class under the military rule. He is conversant with the grammar of military politics. But, the impeachment battle under the civilian regime is a different ball game. It is not a conventional war which a General like him is not prepared for. In a battle of this nature, the weapons of war include the federal might, the militarisation of the impeachment process, massive funding for the plot and the numerical supremacy in the House of Assembly. Even, an opposition governor, who is endowed with exemplary negotiation skills, persuasive talents and power of political inducement, would still have a slim chance of survival. Thus, a political solution was foreclosed.

    For the septuagenarian politician, the last two years have been turbulent. Nyako has been battling with the insurgency by the members of the Boko Haram. In the Northeast state, a state of emergency has been declared. On two occasions, the former governor escaped being killed by the sect members. Few months ago, he forwarded a letter to the Northern Governors Forum, alleging that the Federal Government adopted a wrong strategy in tackling the insecurity. Stressing that the military was incompetent to handle the crisis, Nyako said soldiers relied on obsolete and inadequate weapons. He also complained that a full-fledged genocide was being committed against the Northern Nigeria in the name of fighting insurgency. He alleged that ill-trained soldiers were drafted to curb the menace. ‘‘They are being poorly trained, totally ill-equipped, given only uniform and are killed by their trainers in Nigerian Army training centres as soon as they arrive in the Nigerian Army camps being used by the so-called Boko Haram insurgents.

    “Virtually all the Nigerian soldiers killed or murdered in these operations so far are of Northern Nigeria origin. The administration has also hired militia men from across the continent, especially North Africa, who have been deceived into accepting to come because they were made to believe that they would be fighting infidels,” he added.

    The letter may have been misunderstood by Jonathan. According to sources, the President, who was infuriated by the tone of the letter, complained that Nyako had refused to withdraw the memo or apologise. But, the governor insisted that he would not compromise the security of Adamawa State.

    To observers, Nyako’s nightmare started when he lost grip on the House of Assembly. When he defected to the APC, the legislators did not defect with him. During the impeachment saga, the odds were against him. Of the 25 legislators, 20 insisted that he should vacate office. Following his defection, relations between the executive and legislature became frosty. When cracks appeared on the wall, the stage was set for the inducement of the legislators by the governor’s detractors.

    As the impeachment drama was unfolding, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) froze Adamawa State bank accounts. Instantly, the administration was crippled. The House met and drafted the impeachment notice. Many allegations were raised and the burden of proof was on the embattled governor. According to the notice, Nyako was expected to defend 20 charges of gross misconduct. He was accused of abuse of office, misuse of public funds and personalisation of power. In addition, there were allegations of squandering N1 billion Scholarship Trust Fund and the abuse of the law by appointing his wife, Dr. Halima, as the Chairman of the Adamawa State Action Committee on AIDS. Some officials of his administration were also accused of looting. The legislators explained that some of the impeachable offences were committed by Nyako three years ago.

    To save the governor from the looming disaster, some Adamawa opinion leaders attempted to broker peace between him and the House. But, the conditions for truce were stringent. The House led by Speaker Umaru Fintiri demanded that Nyako should render accounts. It accused the government of illegal deductions from the allowances of the civil servants totaling N142 million. Nyako was asked to submit bank statements showing income and expenditure and pay the withheld salaries of teachers who had embarked on strike.

    Asked why it took the House three years to beam a searchlight on the administration, a legislator, Adanu Kamale, said time factor was a non-issue.

    Nyako’s real offence was his defection from the PDP. But, the lawmakers also had another axe to grind with him. He had come under attack for not inaugurating the chairmen and secretaries of 37 Development Areas Authorities (DAA). Many of them were nominated by the lawmakers. When he sought to appease them with their inauguration last week, it was too late. Also, last week, Nyako, said a source, was offered the option of resignation. But, he rejected it, saying that the impeachment plot lacked basis.

    Moving the motion for the impeachment, the Deputy Speaker, Kwamoti Laori, said the House relied on Section 188, sub-section 3 and 4 of the 1999 Constitution, which stipulate that the process can proceed after a 14-day notice. It was seconded by Hon. Umar Abdulkareem.

    “We have satisfied the two-thirds majority, with 20 out of 25 members, which empowers the House of Assembly to call on the Chief Judge to constitute an investigation panel,” Laori said. However, when the Clerk of the Assembly showed up at the Government House to serve the impeachment notice on Nyako, he was not around. For two days, efforts to deliver the letter was abortive.  The Clerk later pasted the notice on the wall of the Government House.

    To save his career, Nyako approached the temple of justice. The former Acting Chief Judge, Justice A.D. Mammadi, granted his prayer for an order of interim injunction restraining the House from taking any further action on the impeachment. But, four days later, the jurist, whose tenure was about to expire, approved the plot by swearing in members of the impeachment panel. The seven-man committee was chaired by Alhaji Baba Kaigama.

    Nyako and Ngilari shunned the panel, claiming that it was not properly constituted. They neither sent their aides nor counsel to represent them. Two issues were raised by the governor. He said the panel was not inaugurated by the Chief Judge because the Acting Chief Judge who set it up had to retire immediately. Also, the impeachment notice was not served on the governor. It was pasted on the wall of the state secretariat. Thus, the governor’s aide, Peter Elisha, submitted that the procedure is wrong. “The panel was not properly set up. It was not properly constituted. It was not inaugurated,” he said.

    The APC Publicity Secretary in Adamawa State, Phineas Padio, was in the same frame of mind. Faulting the process, he said it violated the law. Padio pointed out that it was strange that the acting chief judge, who highlighted the guidelines for the impeachment, later set up the panel when it was clear that the procedure had been breached. He also said the method used by the lawmakers to serve the impeachment notice on the governor and his deputy was unconstitutional. “The acting chief judge had ruled that the notice of impeachment must be served through personal means. He even quoted a Supreme Court ruling that said it could not be served through the pages of newspapers as the House did. Yet, he went ahead to constitute the panel, although the notice was not properly served,” he fumed.

    Nyako’s spokesman, Ahmed Sajoh, defended the refusal of his boss to appear before the committee. He said: “It is an illegal body, which has no basis in law.” Sajoh said that the House should have served the notice directly, instead of pasting it. “They are supposed to serve it. Besides, the panel was illegally constituted because those behind it ignored a subsisting court order. The composition of the committee itself is faulty.  Card-carrying members of the Peoples Democratic Party are among the panelists,” he added.

    Efforts by non-partisan Adamawa leaders to save Nyako also hit the rock. Pleas by traditional rulers led by the Lamido of Adamawa, Alhaji Mohammed Musdafa to the lawmakers to have a change of heart fell on deaf ears. The Council of Pastors led by Rev. Victor Ordinan also offered to broker reconciliation, but without success.  Prominent PDP chieftains were monitoring the 20 legislators. A member of the PDP Elders and Stakeholders’ Forum, Dr. Umar Ado, warned the legislators against backing out. He described the impeachment as a party assignment, stressing that only the PDP has the power to discontinue it. Although sources also said some retired Generals requested the President to intervene in the crisis, he refused to assist his political foe and ardent critic.

    At the weekend, the investigative panel hurriedly concluded its assignment on a controversial note after sitting for two days. As the panel was writing its pre-determined report, Nyako was receiving supporters on solidarity visit.

    Yesterday, the hammer fell on the governor. Before the impeachment, a source said he had packed out of the Government House.

    The question now is: What next after the impeachment?

     

  • Governors, Saraki Atiku, Balarabe condemned Nyako impeachment

    Governors, Saraki Atiku, Balarabe condemned Nyako impeachment

    The Nigeria Governors Forum (NGF), the All Progressives Congress (APC) Governors’ Forum and eminent Nigerians condemned yesterday the impeachment of Adamawa State Governor Murtala Nyako.

    NGF chairman Chibuike Amaechi, the Rivers State governor, described the act as “a sad day for democracy in the country.”

    The APC governors speaking through its chairman Rochas Okorocha, said the action “is bad politics of intimidation aimed at stifling the opposition. “

    He added that it could have a negative effect on the country’s fight against democracy.

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Senator Bukola Saraki and second Republic Governor Balarabe Musa, also condemned the removal of the governor.

    Amaechi urged Rivers people and members of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to remain calm, saying by God’s grace, he would hand over to his successor on May 29 next year.

    The Rivers governor, who spoke through Commissioner for Information and Communications, Mrs. Ibim Semenitari, asked the Minister of State for Education, Chief Nyesom Wike; the Rivers Chairman of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Felix Obuah, and the six “desperate” lawmakers to give peace a chance in Rivers State and bear in mind that power belongs to God. He urged them to stop their “rascality” forthwith.

    Semenitari said: “The Rivers State Government is assuring the people of the state that the enemies of progress will fail and all the persons plotting to impeach Governor Amaechi and their paymasters in Abuja will be disappointed, because God remains the Almighty.

    “We wish to appeal to all well-meaning people in Nigeria and around the world to please call the PDP leaders to order, before they truncate the nation’s democracy. They are becoming too desperate over 2015, forgetting God.

    “It is now very obvious that the members of the PDP, especially the leaders of the drowning party, have no interest in the peace and stability of Rivers State. Their evil plan will never come to pass. They are afraid, because Rivers remains an APC state and the people of the state, who have not seen any Federal Government project, will chase them away in 2015.”

    The Rivers information commissioner also stated that there would be no hiding place for the six pro-Wike lawmakers, in the 32-member Assembly, while insisting that emphasis must always be placed on the rule of law and due process.

    Semenitari said: “Just on June 19, shortly after Governor Amaechi was held hostage in commando style by soldiers and the Federal Government’s security agents in Odudu, Ondo State, on his way to Ekiti State, where he was to join Governor Kayode Fayemi and other leaders of the APC, for the mega rally before the June 21 election, we informed Rivers people about the move to impeach Governor Amaechi earlier in the day. The six Rivers lawmakers and their sponsors are not relenting, not minding the illegality and unconstitutionality of their proposed action.

    “We wish that the PDP-led Federal Government will address the spate of insecurity in Nigeria, especially the embarrassing Boko Haram menace and suicide bombings, with as much fervor and vigour as it has deployed in plotting against and witch-hunting its political opponents, at a time the over 200 innocent Chibok girls, kidnapped since April 15, are still in captivity.”

    Okorocha, in a statement by his Senior Special Assistant on media, Mr. Sam Onwuemeodo, regretted that despite series of discussions and dialogue with members of the Adamawa State House of Assembly to have a rethink, they went ahead with the plot.

    “ The impeachment won’t encourage other nations of the world willing to help us come out of our security problem to take us serious.  To say the least, the impeachment was not the best of actions this time”,  the statement said.

    The Imo Governor added that “What the nation needs most this time should be ideas, unity of purpose and patriotism to deal decisively with the lingering security problems threatening our nationhood and not actions that would further inject bad blood among the leaders of this country and the citizenry in general.

    “The impeachment of the Adamawa State Governor and similar impeachment threats against the governors of Nasarawa, Edo, Rivers and so on, could be explained as bad politics of intimidation aimed at stifling the APC as a party and threatening our nascent democracy.  The impeachment has no iota of value to add to the nation’s growth and development, and even to the progress of Adamawa State”, he said.

    Atiku Abubakar warned against the excessive use of power by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)-led Federal Government, a tendency, which he said, was not good for decent democratic practice.

    In a statement by his media office in Abuja, Atiku said wielding the axe of impeachment against elected public office holders to settle scores by the PDP-led Federal Government would needlessly build up tension in the country.

    The former Vice President said the reckless use of impeachment to settle scores could not have been the intention of the framers of the 1999 Constitution.

    He said the frequency with which elective officials were being shot down by impeachment would destroy the whole purpose of inserting the impeachment clause in the Constitution.

    He regretted that the use of impeachment to harass and humiliate perceived opponents by the PDP-led Federal Government would ultimately bastardise the spirit in which the constitution provides for the impeachment clause.

    The former Vice President admonished the PDP-led Federal Government to take it easy in the way they use power, adding that the constitution was not meant to provide ammo to anybody to harass and humiliate opponents or force them out of office.

    He deplored the use of financial inducements to influence the removal of perceived opponents from office. According to him, triumphalism in the suppression of opponents is a bad omen for democracy.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Ecology and Environment, Senator Saraki, described the impeachment as unfortunate.

    He said: “It is very unfortunate and I think we are seven months to the end of the tenure. We all need to look at the bigger picture, look at the stability of our democracy.

    “After Adamawa, I think Nasarawa State governor is being served with impeachment notice and three other states are going to be served.

    “The bigger issue in this country now is the issue of security, and poverty.  Some of the issues raised against the Adamawa State Governor can also apply anywhere and we need to be mature with our democracy.

    “The issue of impeachment should not be our priority at this stage and those of us that love this country will really need to talk to ourselves and be more concerned with the insecurity  before us instead of dissipating our energy on issues that will divide us by overheating the polity and creating problems for ourselves.

    “We should talk about how to improve security and ensure better living conditions of our people. Those who are beating the drums now should know that it will come back to them.”

    Balarabe Musa described the impeachment of as a desperate act by the PDP

    He said he was not surprised by the news of the impeachment, saying, he had observed that the PDP was desperate to reduce the All Progressive Congress (APC) to a loyal opposition party.

    According to the elder statesman, who himself was impeached in the Second Republic: “I am not surprised because, the PDP is desperate to reduce the APC to a mere loyal opposition and they have found Adamawa as a soft spot, following the defection of House of Assembly members to PDP.

    “Secondly, the fight among the elite of Adamawa State for power had made it very easy for the PDP to succeed in its plan,” he said.

    The “PDP is mindless, insensitive and practising do or die politics, which is very dangerous for the development of Nigeria’s democracy.”

    I have my doubts if due processes were followed.  I think the impeachment was not an act of the Adamawa State House of Assembly. It appears Governor Nyako is being punished for holding views considered subversive and against the powers that be.

    “To remove a governor is not a small business. It is a serious constitutional duty that must be carried out in accordance with due processes and after affording the governor adequate time and opportunity to defend himself.

    The Conference of Nigerian Political Parties (CNPP) blamed President Goodluck Jonathan of playing ‘politics of dictatorship’ by hunting opposition governors.

    It advised Dr. Jonathan to follow due process.

    It said: “we wish to advise President Jonathan to always adhere to the rule of law and hard core democratic tenets; for we could notice signs of dictatorship creeping into the political landscape. For instance the Maiduguri airport which was closed to pilgrims because of Boko Haram was opened for the man who nurtured the monster, what an irony.”Yesterday, it was Governor Murtala Nyako, today Tanko Almakura, tomorrow another APC governor to be impeached, so no PDP governor is corrupt?”The statement was issued by the CNPP National Publicity Secretary, Osita Okechukwu.