Tag: NBA

  • Falana urges NBA to publish voters’ register

    Falana urges NBA to publish voters’ register

    •Association’s election tomorrow

    Lagos lawyer Mr Femi Falana (SAN) has urged the Chairman of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) Electoral Committee, Okey Amechi (SAN), to publish the voters’ register compiled for this year’s election.

    The Bar election will hold tomorrow in Abuja.

    The frontline lawyer said there was a reason to suspect that the register may contain fictitious names, including the names of dead lawyers, as it happened in the 2012 poll.

    Falana said unless the voters’ register is published before the day of the election, he would not hesitate “to approach the appropriate High Court to stop the manipulation of the electoral process by the NBA leadership”.

    He added: “Lawyers cannot afford to fix election results as they are entrusted with the responsibility of filing and defending election petitions in the country.”

    The activist explained that to ensure transparency in this year’s NBA poll, he was compelled, last week, to apply for a copy of the voters’ register under the Freedom of Information Act, 2011.

    He said he was assured that the register would be published ahead of the election. “But for some inexplicable reasons, the NBA Electoral Committee has refused to publish the voters register 48 hours to the election,” Falana said.

    The lawyer alleged that “with the connivance of the leadership of the NBA, those lawyers were allowed to vote from the grave! Even though the credibility of the election was called to question, those who were genuinely dissatisfied with the fraudulent results were advised to allow sleeping dogs to lie.

    Falana said: “I have drawn the attention of the Secretary of the NBA Electoral Committee to the evidence at my disposal that the voters’ register compiled for the election contains the names of many lawyers who are not qualified to vote. For instance, some concerned members of the NBA have reliably informed me that the list of the 47 delegates representing the Abuja branch of the NBA was compiled in utter breach of the Constitution of the NBA.

    “I have equally confirmed that the list of co-opted members of the National Executive Committee of the NBA contains 135 names, contrary to the clear provisions of the NBA Constitution.

    “In a similar situation in August 1992, I had cause to obtain a court order to stop the NBA election when I discovered that the then military junta had concluded plans to hijack the electoral process with a view to installing and imposing its stooges as leaders of the Bar.

    “It is hoped that history will not be allowed to repeat itself by the NBA Electoral Committee.”

  • ‘It’s time for change in NBA’

    ‘It’s time for change in NBA’

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) election will hold next Tuesday. Mrs Funke Adekoya (SAN) is the third in our interview series on the candidates. She tells Legal Editor John Austin Unachukwu, why she is running for the office, her programme and sundry issues.

    There have been  calls for an Electoral Offences Commission to adjudicate on electoral offences in the country. What is your reaction to this?

    I do not support the idea of an Electoral Offences Commission specially set up to adjudicate over electoral offences. All offences are serious and deserve equal attention from the administration of justice system. We had the Failed Banks Tribunal and the Miscellaneous Offences Tribunal in the past and the administration of justice system suffered from delays in the hearing of regular matters because judges were posted to these tribunals.

    Electoraloffences were created by our Electoral Law a while back. It is not the absence of a court that has prevented the arraignment of offenders before now but the political will to try offenders. If the political will is there, offenders can be arraigned before the regular courts and dealt with appropriately.

    What is your appraisal of the performance of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in the conduct of by elections in the country with respect to our recent experiences?

    The INEC has fallen short of my personal expectations even though they had a good outing in the Ekiti State elections.  I have the highest respect for Professor Attahiru Jega and hold him in the highest esteem.

    Perhaps because I am not privy to any bottlenecks hindering the performance of the Commission I may be judging wrongly, but I was excited when he indicated that electronic voting would be used for the 2015 elections and would be test run in the Ekiti and Osun elections.

    The law to allow this to happen has not been changed till date. I feel he has the clout to make this happen, but as I stated earlier, perhaps I am wrong. In addition the NBA Electoral Monitoring Group which monitored the elections on behalf of the NBA reported that the Commission needs to do more in the area of voter education, as some elderly voters came to vote without being aware of who or which party

    What does this portend for 2015 general elections ?

    For credible elections, voter education needs to be improved upon.

    However the staggering of the elections should be re-visited so as to avoid a ‘bandwagon’ effect. I do not see why it is impossible for all the elections to be held on the same day, moreso now the Senate is supporting the amendment of the Electoral Act to allow electronic voting. This will also avoid voter fatigue and increase voter turnout, which is itself a factor in holding credible elections.  On the plus side, the colour coding of ballot papers in the June elections made the movement of ballot boxes a non-issue. If such innovative systems are replicated in the 2015 elections, those elections will be more credible.

     As a Presidential candidate in the forthcoming NBA elections, why do you think you are the most qualified to lead the Bar at this time?

    I believe I am the most qualified to lead the Bar at this time because I can utilise my international exposure – through my years of active involvement with the Bar Issues Commission of the International Bar Association where I served as an Officer – to implement and inject international best practices into the management of our Bar Association. The election of our Secretary-General as a Vice President of PALU means Nigeria is gaining recognition on the international legal stage, and our Bar Association must be ‘fit for purpose’.

    Furthermore, I believe I am the most qualified in terms of my length of service and the wealth of experience in service to the profession through the Association, which experience has been utilised by every

    NBA President since Chief T. J. Okpoko (SAN) became the President of the revived NBA in 2000. He appointed me as a member of the NBA Disciplinary Committee for the Lagos Zone. In 1999 he also nominated me to the Body of Benchers as a representative of the Association. He also appointed me as a member of the National Judiciary Committee of the Association. The Committee was chaired by Mr. Olisa Agbakoba, SAN and was charged with oversight of relationships between the Bar and the Bench at the national level.

    Between 2002 and 2004, I was the first Vice President of the Association under the presidency of Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN). In that role, I served as Chair of the National Human Rights Committee that later evolved into the Human Rights Institute. I ensured that committees were constituted under the leadership of the first Vice Chairman of each

    branch to provide pro bono legal services. Quarterly reports of pro bono cases were provided to me by each branch. Branches were encouraged to approach lawyers and law firms in their territory to initiate fundamental human rights proceedings to assist awaiting trial detainees and aid prison decongestion.  I also pioneered the campaign for introduction of the use of stamps and seals by all lawyers practicing in Nigeria, similar to those used by architects and engineers to authenticate their professional status. The project was successfully launched by the then Chief Justice of Nigeria during the NEC meeting in Ilorin in June 2004 and then abandoned. 10 years later, the Association has now revived the project.

    Tell us the key issues in your manifesto and how you intend to go about them?

    The key issues in my manifesto are three-fold and I intend to achieve them as set out below: Human Resource Development – I will champion the process of equipping members with requisite skills and providing them with needed access to information, knowledge and professional training that, in turn, enables them perform optimally and effectively. Organisational Development – Utilising the experience gained as an Officer of the Bar Issues Commission of the International Bar Association, I will put in place structures, processes and procedures for efficient management of the Association. This will ensure that the Association delivers necessary membership benefits to all members of the legal profession who pay their practising fees before 31st March of each year. Institutional and Legal Framework Development – Under my leadership, the Association will implement the five-year Strategic Development Plan proposed for the Association. I will also promote the introduction of legal and regulatory changes that will enable the Association to better enhance the role of its members and make itself the true representative voice of the profession, its members and the society at large.

    There have been calls for electoral reforms at the Bar to make our elections transparent, credible, free fair and rancuor free. What is your view on this?

    As immediate past chair of the Nigerian Branch of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (United Kingdom), I implemented the use of electronic/online voting for our Branch elections. This meant that our members all over the country did not have to converge in Lagos at the risk of life and limb before they could vote for the Executive Committee members of our choice. Based on our membership strength, it cost us less than USD $1000 and increased voter participation by over 100 per cent. I would propose this as an alternative to our present system of voting,  and if accepted would submit proposals to amend the NBA Constitution to allow for its implementation.

      There seems to be a disconnect between the NBA and majority of its members. How do intend tackle this and make the association the pride of its members?

    It is true that currently there is a lack of involvement of members in the affairs and activities of the Nigerian Bar Association. This can be solved through an all-inclusive approach to leadership which I would implement, if elected. Consultation with Branch chairmen on issues affecting the profession is key to inclusiveness. There is also a huge disconnect between the leadership and its members who are largely uninformed about the activities of the Association. Some lawyers think the elections are by universal suffrage and will take place during the Annual General Conference in Owerri next month and are planning to attend the conference so they can vote! I had to educate them otherwise. The Publicity Secretary is responsible for communicating issues between the Association and its members. I have reached out to the profession through the various social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, in addition to emails and SMS. Under my leadership, the Publicity Secretary will be mandated to vigorously engage with members through these various platforms. In addition, we shall ensure publication of monthly Electronic Newsletters to be provided to members of the association so as to keep them abreast of news and activities of the association.

    You are reputed to have served the Bar in its golden years. What experiences are you bringing  to reposition the organisation if elected its president?

    Let me say that prior to 2000, I served as Assistant National Secretary and as Secretary of Lagos Branch between 1984 and 1986. I then served as National Treasurer between 1990 and 1992. My record of service spans the last 35 years. I intend to deploy all these experiences and the ones earlier set out to the service of our association if I am elected.

  • NBA Presidency: Yoruba lawyers drum support for candidates                             

    NBA Presidency: Yoruba lawyers drum support for candidates                             

    AHEAD  of the July  15 election of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA),Yoruba Lawyers Association aka Egbe Amofin is drumming support for its presidential candidates.

    The Egbe’s Chairman Chief Bandele Aiku urged his colleagues to respect the group’s zoning arrangement  by voting  for any contestants from the Southwest as the NBA’s president.

    He spoke during a meeting of the group in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital. He said: “It is just a matter of understanding and arrangement – ‘you scratch my back, I scratch your back’. It does not matter who wins the Presidency”.

    Mrs.  Funke Adekoya (SAN), Mr Dele Adesina (SAN), Chief Niyi Akintola (SAN), Mr Augustine Alegeh (SAN), Midwest and O. J. Erhabor  have indicated interest in the race.

    Contestants from other zones who came to canvass for the group’s support were Francis  Ekwere, Reuben James, Mackson Oruma and Chinwe Nwadike, who was adopted by EBF as its candidate for Treasurer, Afam Osigwe, Steve Abar and T. T. Igba.

    Aiku said: “The leaders of the Mid-West Bar came to us  in 2012 and indicated interest to be with us. We welcome them  and told them that the  third round of the zoning arrangement has just started with the Eastern Bar Forum  producing the Okey Wali (SAN) as its candidate, the  Southwest will produce the NBA President in 2014 and when next it comes to us  that is 2020, the Midwest will take the slot and no candidate from the Southwest.

    “They  thanked us and promised to go, consult with their people and get back to us. We did not hear from them again, what we heard is that they have a Presidential candidate to contest the election with the Southwest.

    “We have written to the leadership of the Eastern Bar Forum (EBF) and the Arewa Lawyers Forum  (Arewa) intimating them with the situation and telling them who our candidates are. We will still approach them and  make our position clearer to them.”

    The Secretary of Egbe Amofin, Mr. Ranti Ajeleti, said: “We met and considered our members who are contesting for other  offices at the election apart from the Presidency. Where we have only one person contesting for an office, we adopt that person. But where we have more than one person aspiring for the same office, we consider them, choose one and ask the other one to wait. At the end of the day we will meet with the other fora and joggle the list.”

    On what he meant by joggling the list, Ajeleti said: “The EBF will come with its list, the Arewa will come with their own and we will sit down and consider the lists on their merit and agree on who gets what. When the leadership of the fora meet on the manifesto night, it will  be for the ratification  of  the status of the candidates” Ajeleti stated

    Earlier, the Middle Belt Lawyers Forum (MBLF) held its second meeting in the year in Abuja. It was attended by some members of its Interim Executive Committee. They includE the chairman, Mr.  Emmanuel A. Haruna; First Vice Chairman,  S. P. Dashi;  Secretary, Mr. Agada Elachi; Secretary, Joshua Wapdiye,  Debo Adeyemo, Prince I. A. Ochoga.

    Also in attendance were some leaders/elders of the Forum,. They included former President, NBA, J. B. Daudu (SAN);  Country President, FIDA Hauwa Shekarau; Ocholi James (SAN), Okutepa (SAN), P. O. Okolo, former chairman Abuja branch NBA, A. A. Ibrahim, Chief John Ochoga and Joe Abrahams (SAN).

    It was resolved during its meeting that candidates contesting for national offices of NBA that wish to seek the endorsement, adoption or support of the Forum were required to communicate such desire in writing to the Forum.

    The Forum adopted the following for some offices in the  NBA Election: Reuben Usman James, general secretary; M. I. Komolafe, third vice president; T. T. Igba, welfare secretary;  I. A. Ochoga, financial  secretary  and R.O. Balogun, legal adviser.

    Adoption of candidates for other offices will be addressed by the Forum at its next meeting.

    Some candidates delivered goodwill messages to the Forum during the meeting. They include Funke Adekoya (SAN),  Chief Niyi Akintola (SAN), A.Alegeh (SAN), O. J. Erhabor, Barth Okeye-Aniche, Chairman  NBA Abuja branch, and Mr. Desmond U. M. Yamah who represented Mr.  Afam Osigwe.

    Others were  Francis Ekwere, Taiwo Taiwo, A. A. Ashong, Kunle Edun and A. Oluwole.

  • Incessant power outage delays justice delivery – Fashola

    Incessant power outage delays justice delivery – Fashola

    Lagos State governor, Babatunde Raji Fashola(SAN), on Thursday said incessant power outage in the state high courts  has contributed to delay justice administration.

    The governor said that an investigation he carried out between 1997 and 2000 revealed that some lawyers and litigants connived with the defunct Power Holding Company of Nigeria officials to cause power outage in courts in order to delay proceedings.

    Fashola stated this at the City Hall, Lagos, while declaring open a one-day conference on “Delay in Justice Administration-Beyond The Rules and The Law,” organised by the state Ministry of Justice in conjunction with the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in the four divisions of the state judiciary.

    The governor, who said that lawyers are trained to assist their clients, added that lawyers should be honest enough to restrain their clients from going to court.

    He said, “What is the value of a judge sitting for hours over a matter that is not actionable only for the lawyer to be filing frivolous applications?

    Fashola also noted that the architectural designs of the court rooms have also constituted delays in administration of justice.

    He noted that whenever there is power outage in the courts, there is nothing that can be done again.

    “In the old court rooms, there was cross ventilation and day light in the court rooms. So there was no disruption of proceeding as a result of power outage.

    “I think we should start looking into designing court rooms that would have cross ventilation and day lights,” he said.

    The state Attorney General, Mr. Ade Ipaye, in his address noted that lawyers and litigants are key players that can either speed up or slow down the process of adjudication.

  • Rivers NBA denies opposing law

    Four branches of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Rivers State have dissociated themselves from the claim by the Port Harcourt branch that all the branches have opposed the amended state High Court Law.

    Ahoada, Isiokpo, Bori and Degema branches, in a statement by their chairmen, said they never met nor resolved to take such collective decision.

    Urging the public to disregard the statement by the Port Harcourt branch, they said a comprehensive peace move has been initiated to resolve the lingering crisis in the state’s judiciary.

    “Presently, there is a peace committee comprising the chairmen and secretaries of the five branches of the NBA in Rivers State and headed by Senator Cyrus Nunieh, the oldest practicing lawyer in Rivers State.

    “Consultation with all stakeholders is ongoing with a view to resolving the impasse. We enjoin our members and the public to be patient and await the outcome of the peace committee and to desist from acts capable of jeopardising the committee’s efforts,” they said.

  • NBA election: Lawyers reject guidelines

    NBA election: Lawyers reject guidelines

    The Lagos branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has rejected some aspects of the guidelines for the association’s next month’s national election.

    It described them as illegal.

    One of the guidelines stipulates that NBA branches must submit bank tellers “as evidence of payment of annual practicing fee as at 1st April, 2014”.

    In a resolution by the branch’s Chairman Alex Muoka and Publicity Secretary Abdulrasheed Ibrahim, the NBA branch noted that such requirement is not only “unconstitutional” – because it is not contained in NBA’s Constitution of 2009 – but is a ploy to “disenfranchise branches and voters”.

  • How to reduce Supreme Court’s workload, by SAN

    How to reduce Supreme Court’s workload, by SAN

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) General Secretary, Deacon Dele Adesina (SAN), has called for a judicial policy in which interlocutory appeals will terminate at the Court of Appeal.

    The lawyer said this would reduce the Supreme Court’s workload and fast-track appeals.

    He said the Supreme Court was behind schedule in the determination of several appeals, adding that the number of justices should be increased.

    Adesina said: “As at December 2013, the Supreme Court was still hearing appeals filed in 2009. This translates to the fact that it is heavily overloaded by work and unacceptably behind their schedule by five solid years.

    “A comparative analysis of our Supreme Court and those of other countries will show in unmistakable terms that it is the busiest in the world.”

    The SAN, who is among contestants for NBA President next month, addressed reporters yesterday in Lagos when he unveiled his Nine-Point Agenda.

    Adesina’s agenda focuses on NBA governance, lawyers’ welfare, capacity building/economic empowerment, promotion of efficient justice delivery, rule of law and NBA corporate social responsibility, enthronement of high ethical standards, reform of legal education, globalisation of legal practice and anti-corruption.

    The lawyer promised that said his administration would begin a sustained campaign for judicial reform. He said: “A policy of creating further divisions of the Court of Appeal shall be pursued, all in a bid to bring justice closer to the people, minimise cost of litigation and enhance speedy justice system on the part of litigants.”

    To combat official sleaze, Adesina said the NBA would develop an anti-graft policy and strengthen its anti-corruption commission by widening its scope to include monitoring the justice delivery system.

    NBA, he said, would ensure that only lawyers prosecute cases at lower courts.

    The lawyer promised to secure judicial authority to employ legal assistants and judicial research officers for all judges.

    Such steps, Adesina added, would create at least 2,500 jobs for lawyers.

     

  • EBF adopts candidates for NBA elections

    EBF adopts candidates for NBA elections

    The Eastern Bar Forum (EBF) has adopted candidates for next month’s Nigerian Bar Association (NB A)  election to be held between July  14 and 15 in Abuja.

    The group’s governing council met in Aba, Abia State at the weekend.

    Osas Erhabor, Chief Niyi Akintola (SAN), Funke Adekoya (SAN), Augustine Alegeh (SAN) and Dele Adesina (SAN) who are presidential candidates, addressed the meeting.

    Two offices are open for EBF members – those of the Third Vice-President and General Secretary.

    Those running for Third Vice-President are Mr. XYZ Olando, Lawrence Nwakaeti and Andrew Ashon.

    Former Abuja Branch Chairman, Mazi Afam Osigwe, Mrs. Joyce Oduah and Mr. Bath. Aniche–Okoye are vying for General Secretary.

    After the deliberations, Ashon and Osigwe were adopted as the forum’s candidates.

    Others adopted are Mr. Francis Ekwere (First –Vice President), Afam Obi (Second Vice-President), C.C. Onwuzuluike (Legal Adviser), Unachukwu John Austin (Publicity Secretary), Kelvin Ejelonu (Financial Secretary), U.F.O. Nnaemeka (First Assistant Secretary) and Cecelia Ogbuji  (Assistant Financial Secetary).

    NBA President Okey Wali (SAN) urged the  candidates to play by the rules and avoid politics of calumny and mudslinging.

    “We have achieved much, we have done much and we must  do nothing to endanger what we have achieved. Those endorsed should embrace their colleagues. Those who did not get the endorsement this time around should wait for next time.

    “It is not a do or die affair, if you don’t get it now, you will get it the next time,” Wali said.

    EBF, however, did not adopt any of the Presidential candidates because it is zoned to the Southwest.  It urged the forum adopt a candidate and inform other regional fora.

     

     

  • Court outlaws inclusion of Judiciary’s budget in Executive’s Appropriation Bill

    Court outlaws inclusion of Judiciary’s budget in Executive’s Appropriation Bill

    A Federal High Court in Abuja yesterday held that it was unconstitutional for the Judiciary to submit its annual budget estimates to the Executive for consideration and inclusion in its Appropriation Bill to the National Assembly for passage as budget.

    Justice Ahmed Mohammed, in a judgment yesterday, held that the practice was not only wrong but offends the principle of separation of power and independence of the Judiciary enshrined in the Constitution.

    The judge held that since the Judiciary was not an agency of the Executive, and the National Assembly is not made to submit its budget estimates to the Executive, it was wrong to expect the Judiciary to be subjected to Executive control in budgeting and finance.

    “The submission of the Judiciary’s budget to the Executive for consideration is unlawful and unconstitutional. If the National Assembly does not submit its budget estimates to the Executive, why is the Judiciary expected to do so? “

    “The provisions of Sections 81 and 84 of the Constitution should be adhered to. The Constitution has not recognised the practice of the Judiciary submitting its budget estimates to the Executive for consideration and inclusion in the Executive Bill to the National Assembly,” the judge held.

    The judgment was delivered based on a suit filed by a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) seeking among others, fiscal autonomy for the Judiciary. The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the National Assembly were defendants in the suit.

    Justice Mohammed declared that, henceforth, the budget of the Judiciary would be prepared by the NJC and must no longer be “part of the estimates to be included in the Appropriation Bill as proposed expenditures by the President as is the present practice”.

    The judge agreed with the plaintiff, who contended that the manner by which judiciary’s budget was being appropriated was contrary to the principle of separation of power and the provisions of Sections 81 (2) and Section 84(1), (2), (3), (4), and (7) of the Constitution.

    The judge declared that any amount standing to the credit of the judiciary in the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation should henceforth be paid directly in whole to the NJC for disbursement and never again through the budget office of the executive arm of government.

    He granted the seven reliefs sought by the plaintiff, one of which is a prayer for a perpetual Injunction against the defendants from all practices on judiciary funding which run contrary to Sections 81 (2) (3) and 84(2) (7) constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, to wit, submitting judiciary’s estimates to the executive instead of directly to the 3rd defendant (National Assembly) and release of the judiciary’s fund in warrants by the executive instead of directly to the 3rd defendant for disbursement;

    The judge also made a consequential order, restraining the 1st and 3rd defendant (the AGF and the National Assembly) from appropriating the funds for the Judiciary in the annual Appropriation Act.”

    The judge dismissed all the arguments canvassed by both AGF and the National Assembly in opposition to the suit.He agreed with the plaintiff that “the continued dependence of the judiciary on the executive arm, represented by the 1st defendant for its budgeting and funds release is directly responsible for the present state of under-funding of the Judiciary”.

    The judge held that the contention of both the AGF and the National Assembly that the practice of sending the judiciary’s budget estimate to the executive arm of government could not be justified as much as the practice was in clear conflict with the provisions of the Constitution.

    The judge also dismissed the preliminary objection filed by the National Assembly, challenging the jurisdiction of the court on the grounds that the plaintiff lacked locus standi; that the suit disclosed no reasonable cause of action and that the suit constituted an abuse of court process.

     

  • NBA President urges lawyers  to defend rule of law

    NBA President urges lawyers to defend rule of law

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) president Mr. Okey Wali (SAN) has called on  lawyers to remain change agents in the defence of democracy and the rule of law.

    He apoke in Ugep, Cross River State during  the inauguration of NBA’s Ikom branch. It also held a Law Week.

    Wali, represented by Chief Joe Agi (SAN), said unless lawyers stand against oppression and misrule, the country would not attain the required socio-economic and political growth.

    The Senate leader, Senator Victor Ndoma Egba donated a new bus to the branch.

    The  branch chairman, Mr. Emmanuel Okang said lawyers have a role to play in making the world a better place.

    “As the world gradually becomes a global village, it is our duty as lawyers, to make global values in our areas of domicile a reality.

    “As lawyers, we must be seen as principled champions of the rule of law and independence of the legal profession. We must fulfil the core mission of our legal profession by always providing access to justice. We belong to a prestigious and leading profession in the world. As lawyers, we carry the full weight of a long respected and time honoured tradition.

    “If we fail to maintain an effective rule of law and strong defence against corruption, the oncoming generation of lawyers and God will hold us responsible and we will hardly escape complicity. All hands must, therefore, be on deck.”

    Okang said judicial institutions, particularly the judiciary, must improve on their procedure to ensure quicker justice delivery.

    In his keynote address, Prof. Oshita O.  Oshita said citizens have a social contract with the state for the protection of their rights.

    He said everyone in a state should enjoy the benefits of citizenship irrespective of their ethnic origins.

    Analysing the concept of ethnicism, he said it is a condition where self-centred and passionate feelings of a group are fanned to the detriment and resentment of the other.

    This, he said, may be perpetrated by the “in-group members or an out-group that supports that cause.”

    Oshita said the worst thing to happen to any nation is to arrive at the point where the people begin to treasure the past; to see the present with contempt and a deep feeling of angst, and to view the future as fearful, tearful and painfully complicated.

    “As Thomas Jefferson puts it, ‘I love the dreams of the future more than the history of the past.’ How can we stop talking about the good old days in the presence of our children who have had no ‘good old days’ to treasure?

    “Why don’t we work to give our children a ‘good present’ and a future to look forward to? Moving forward, I believe that the different stakeholders in the Nigerian state can together help to engineer a good future for all by doing a number of things.

    “To be relevant in our different environments as useful members of ethnic nationalities we must have a ‘glocal’ attitude – that is, think globally and act locally.”

    He urged the government to strive and manage diversity more strategically in order to accommodate all shades of diversity.

    Religious institutions and economies, he noted, have promoted corruption and underdevelopment in Nigeria.

    ”Mosques and churches are sacred places, but they have contributed to laundering proceeds of corruption otherwise known as ‘bad’ or ‘blood’ money in different ways. Some of the corrupt funds have been used to do ‘thanks-giving’ and others to build edifices in the places of God,” he said.

    He called on professionals  to use their specialised knowledge in building rather than breaking Nigeria.

    “The lawyers, in particular, can play more constructive roles in securing Nigeria through their law practice and the quality of judgements delivered in courts.

    “Some people say lawyers are conservative so they cannot instigate change – but some of those that brought about phenomenal changes in the world were lawyers. Let me mention Nelson Mandela and you may want to mention the rest.

    “We should not allow a revision to the state of nature, the pre-social contract era by our inability to allow the rule of law to prevail. Lawyers and other citizens have crucial role to play in preventing our society from returning to a condition where life is considered nasty, brutish and short,”  Oshita said.