Tag: Nigeria

  • How Nigeria can move forward, by Ribadu

    How Nigeria can move forward, by Ribadu

    •Says no regrets over EFCC years

    Former Chairman, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, yesterday, said Nigeria needed strong institutions to move forward as a nation from its present decadence.

    He also asked youths not to lose hope of rebuilding the country but said that they required a strong will and incorruptible life to salvage the nation.

    Ribadu, who spoke at a “Mentor Me Forum” for youths organised by Group of Patriotic Corpers in Abuja, said he has no regrets for fighting fraudsters as the chairman of the EFCC.

    “What Nigeria needs to realise its potentials is, unfortunately, not a mere change of leadership. We don’t need anyone from outer space to come organise our polity,” he said.

    “We need ourselves—our virtues and belief in a collective struggle for good governance. What we need are functional institutions; we need institutions that pander to the principle of honesty and that socialise successions of citizens who will extol this principle.

    “We need leaders for whom the sufferings of the masses are immediate concerns, not jokers that insult the yearnings and honest observations of the electorate. We need institutions in which the lawmakers gather to discuss the plight of their constituents, not losing their sense of our realities in the luxuries of the state and federal capitals.

    “We need a judiciary that exerts its independence and resist any prejudice in the discharge of justice. We need a civil service that does not ask for bribes to do that for which they receive salaries. We need institutions! We need functional institutions to restore the lost glories and trust that make a sane nation.”

    He pointed out that the real problem of the country “is principally the collapse of our institutions. Our potentials are lost in our civic decadence, which stares at us in the face wherever we go: we see the decadence in the eyes of the policeman flipping through our particulars, we see the decadence in the eyes of the university registrar demanding for bribes to grant or facilitate admissions, we see the decadence in the eyes of every citizen who has lost hope in Nigeria.”

    On his EFCC assignment, he said he has no regrets for fighting fraudsters to a standstill.

    His words: “My appointment as Chairman of the EFCC, for instance, was a turbulent task in which I had to follow the statements of my previously written will to serve in a country where, for lack of functional institutions to check mismanagements of public funds and related criminal misconduct, trust in public institutions had become demolished and perpetrators went about wearing their crimes like badges of honour.

    “I was given an appointment to stand in the way of these celebrated fraudsters—without an office and funds to launch my operations. My success at the EFCC, especially in resisting all tempting offers and calls to bend the rules, was a direct result of my vow from when I was like you that I will never be corrupt. I resented corruption not by lips of mouth but by personal conduct. I refused to be bribed or compromised throughout my public service career. Yet, I am ever happy with myself.

    “I have no regrets that I don’t have mansions all over the world or own a private jet.”

    The ex-EFCC chairman said although the decadence in the country is not the fault of Nigerian youths, they should develop a strong will to save the nation.

  • Obasanjo’s sociology  zero zero zero?

    Obasanjo’s sociology zero zero zero?

    Who are the examples in Obasanjo’s generation that represent the norms subverted by the generation that succeeds Obasanjo’s?

    General Olusegun Obasanjo stood sociology on its head a few days ago when he posited that the younger generation (younger than his own) failed Nigeria and Africa. As reported in The Nation, Obasanjo theorised “that his generation led the way with purposeful, progressive, visionary leadership marked by accountability and probity while the younger generation of leaders failed to continue with the good legacy that his (Obasanjo’s) generation left.” It is what Obasanjo has refused to acknowledge that raises questions about his own sociological knowledge or imagination, more specifically, about what is expected in all societies to be the responsibility of the older generation in the development of the younger generation.

    Now that Obasanjo has identified the generation that has damaged the chances of Africa to grow and compete with the rest of the world, it is pertinent to ask some questions. How were the members of the generation after Obasanjo socialised? What is the role of Obasanjo’s generation in the socialisation of the generation that has, in the words of Obasanjo, become a generation of deviance from the norms embodied by Obasanjo’s generation? Who are the examples in Obasanjo’s generation that represent the norms subverted by the generation that succeeds Obasanjo’s?

    Historically, Obasanjo’s generation came to power on account of fighting corruption perpetrated by members of the generation before his own or of members of his own generation who happened to have had access to political power. Is this an indication that the generation before Obasanjo was also bad or did Obasanjo’s generation lie to citizens when they accused their predecessors of corruption? The regime that succeeded Obasanjo in 1979 was led by people in a generation older than Obasanjo. Again, this group was removed from power by members of Obasanjo’s generation on account of what they called corruption under the presidency of Alhaji Shehu Shagari. Shortly after, another group from Obasanjo’s generation booted out the regime that was manufactured by members of Obasanjo’s generation to replace ShehuShagari, and the rest is history.

    Sociologists and anthropologists all over the world believe that it should not be easy for a generation to castigate the generation after it for not acting normatively. It is generally believed that no generation emerges on its own into a cultural space. Each generation is groomed directly or indirectly by the generation before it. Each citizen is believed to be a product of socialisation or enculturation. This process includes the transfer of values from one generation to the one coming after it. This is done through schooling, through transfer from the older generation of what is considered acceptable and unacceptable behaviour in society. In addition, members of the younger generation learn by imitating the actions of those before them. In effect, apart from whatever is induced by genes, enculturation accounts significantly for what a citizen does or fails to do in his adulthood. While some section of a citizen’s behaviour or misbehaviour can be blamed on genetic inheritance, so much of it is blamed on the values in circulation when a citizen is growing up.

    Going by elements of sociology and anthropology with respect to the role of an older generation in the moulding of the generation after it, members of Obasanjo’s generation cannot be absolved from dereliction of duty with respect to the values or lack of values passed to the generation after them, even if we have to accept without incontrovertible evidence the claim that Obasanjo’s generation was saintly and stellar as rulers of their countries.To beef up Obasanjo’s claim that the generation after his own prevented Africa in general and Nigeria in particular from growing up, it is important to examine the kind of legacy that the generation of the saints left behind.

    Under General Obasanjo’s supervision, the constitution of Nigeria was changed from a federal constitution to a quasi-unitary one. This meant that powers and responsibilities including moral supervision of politicians by citizens, possible under the regime of devolution of powers in the years preceding the coming of Obasanjo to power, were withdrawn from regions and concentrated at the centre. The centre with no direct relationship with citizens became at the instance of Obasanjo the locus of power and resources, and the site of corruption and impunity. Institutions of learning, a major agency in the business of socialisation, were summarily transferred from the supervision of regional authorities to a federal one that had no known values to protect and promote. Moreover, members of Obasanjo’s own generation also introduced a policy that prevented older politicians from seeking power, on account of their understanding that older politicians were attached to the cultures of the nationalities that constituted Nigeria before the coming of military autocracy and the imposition of a unitary constitution. The new breed political class was a creation of the type of military oligarchy presided over by General Obasanjo.

    Apart from General Obasanjo’s proclivity to praise himself, and by extension, his generation in politics, the matter of why Nigeria or Africa is in a mess today cannot be explained via generation bashing. It has to be viewed as a systemic failure. Mugabe belongs more to Obasanjo’s generation than Dariye does, just as Mandela belongs more to Obasanjo’s generation than Tinubu does. Generation bashing is an over simplification of the problems besetting governance in Africa. It is like profiling or stereotyping. Nigeria and most of Africa have had their own share of good and bad old and young politicians.

    If age is everything, Obasanjo would not have picked Dr. Goodluck Jonathan as vice president to UmaruYar’Adua in 2007, as there were many much older politicians with interest in becoming the vice president at that time. Not including President Jonathan in his list of young people who have failed Africa is an indication that, though Jonathan is one of the youngest presidents in the world, he is still considered a good choice bequeathed to Nigeria by Obasanjo.

    Sociology or Anthropology 101 links older and younger generations in the preparation of citizens for socially adjusted citizenship at all levels; for nurturing by the older generate of the younger generation to sustain the values that keep societies going and predispose them to improvement; for members of an older generation to accept their duties and obligations in the failure of members of the younger generation after them for any moral decline, caused by failure to transfer right values to the new generation. Social continuity in all societies does not derive from a saintly father having a satanic son to succeed him or from an angelic mother raising a devilish daughter.Social continuity thrives on a sociological understanding that comes to terms with the existence of an umbilical cord between generations. To praise a good father under whose nose a bad son has grown is to promote Sociology zero zero zero.

  • Nigeria in dire need of functional education-Ex-Ambassador

    Former Nigeria’s Ambassador to Gambia, Dr. Moses Oyedele Ogunlola, has said Nigeria is in dire need of well educated people, who can use their intellect to develop themselves and the society.

    The former diplomat, who stated this at an enlightenment forum in Oyo town, however, expressed worry that the current educational system is not skewed to achieve this objective.

    He noted, “Unfortunately, the nation’s educational system is so fatally flawed that the educated ones show little or no appreciation to the society, even though the opportunity of having that education has been provided by both their parents and the society at large.

    “Rather, the system has concentrated too much on what the individual can get out of education, instead of emphasising the utility value of education in developing the society.”

    While commending Governor Abiola Ajimobi for bringing to bear his intellect and experience in his administration of the state, Ogunlola urged political office holders to come up with a vision that will propel the country into a new era that will integrate her into the global system.

     

  • UN lauds Nigeria, Cameroon over ‘Bakassi transition’

    UN lauds Nigeria, Cameroon over ‘Bakassi transition’

    The United Nations Security Council has welcomed the peaceful conclusion of a special transitional regime established by an agreement between Nigeria and Cameroon concerning the Bakassi Peninsula.

    The 15-member body in a statement commended the governments of Nigeria and Cameroon “for their commitment in honouring the obligations to comply with the decisions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and for the responsible and peaceful way in which they resolved their differences on this matter.”

    In June 2006, the two countries signed the UN-backed Greentree Agreement setting the terms and timeframe for the implementation of the 2002 ruling of the ICJ, which transferred the Bakassi Peninsula from Nigeria to Cameroon.

    The News Agency of Nigeria recalls that Nigeria formally ceded the territory in 2008 and since then a transitional phase has been in place to give full sovereignty of the territory to Cameroon.

    The council, however, commended the role played by the UN Office for West Africa (UNOWA) in chairing the Nigeria-Cameroon Mixed Commission and the Follow-up Committee established to monitor the implementation of the Greentree Agreement.

    “The members of the Security Council commend the efforts of the Nigeria-Cameroon Mixed Commission in facilitating the performance of the obligations under the judgment of the International Court of Justice and the demarcating of the land and maritime boundary between Nigeria and Cameroon,” it said.

     

  • Nigeria,19 others to get $63.4m grant

    NIGERIA and 19 other countries are to benefit from $63.4 million grant by the African Development bank (AfDB) to boost the production of four crops.

    The countries are Benin, Ghana, Cote D’Ivoire, Mali, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Mauritania, and Niger, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Sudan, and Eritrea, Democratic Republic of Congo,Lesotho, Zambia, Madagascar and Zimbabwe.

    President, Institute of Science and Technology, Prof. Lateef Sanni, disclosed this to The Nation.

    Sanni, a Professor of Food Science and Technology at the Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta (UNAAB), said the structure of the project is such that it would enhance wheat, rice, cassava and maize production.

    “And it has engagement protocol for partner countries and has a lot of spill over effects potentially in the future if the project is solidly implemented,” he said.

    “The fact that the AfDB is championing the project shows that is commercial and will be private sector driven and there is a lot of sustainability in the project, he said.

    The project, Support for Agricultural Research and Development of Strategic Crops (SARD-SC) will focus on production to marketing of food.

  • Uwais: Nigeria deserves better leadership

    Uwais: Nigeria deserves better leadership

    The former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Muhammed Lawal Uwais, yesterday said for the country to experience true development, it deserves a better leadership.

    The legal luminary said there is a failure of leadership in the nation.

    He spoke in Abuja in an interview at a public presentation of a book, titled: A Quiet Revolutionary, written by Alhaji Ibrahim Bida Buharia.

    Uwais said: “Leadership is the bane of development in the country. Definitely, there is failure of leadership. We deserve better leadership and as it has been said, with good leadership, the followership will be good as well.”

    The ex-CJN, who said he attended the same school with the author, described the book as relevant to the happenings in the country.

    According to him, the leadership problem needed to be addressed, especially in the North.

    “I am impressed with the book. It is timely because of the present events in the country. It tries to solicit with the leadership, particularly in the North, for service to the people,” he said.

    Niger State Commissioner for Information, Communication and Integration, Prof. Mohammed Kuta, blamed the Federal Government for inadequate planning.

    He said due to the situation, developmental plans were being implemented haphazardly and the country had been at deficit, especially in the education sector.

    “There is a departure from the original concept of development and an educational system that is functional with a fewer people involved in the articulation and administration of development policy,” Kuta said.

    He advised the country to devise a functional educational system to achieve genuine transformation.

     

  • APC ‘ll liberate Nigeria, say ex-PDP members

    The Reformed Action Congress of Nigeria Group, a group of defectors from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Oyo State, yesterday urged Nigerians to support the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Rising from its general meeting in Ogbomoso, the group said the progressives’ party would liberate Nigeria from its sundry challenges and the maladministration by the ruling PDP.

    At the meeting were Alhaji Alli Oyedeji Dodo; Senator Ayo Adeseun, representing Oyo Central and Chairman, Senate Committee on Capital Market; Mr Sharafadeen Abiodun Alli, Chairman, Odua Investment Limited; Kamil Akinlabi Adegbenjo, member, Oyo Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives and Mufu Ogunremi, a former House of Representatives member.

    Others are: Asiwaju Yemi Aderibigbe, Special Adviser to Governor Abiola Ajimobi on Transport and former Chairman, Akinyele Local Government; Mr Sumbo Owolabi, Commissioner for Water Resources; Lanre Agoro, a former House of Representatives member; Alhaji Yinus Akintunde Santana, a former Commissioner for Works and Transport.

    There were also political office holders and board members of government agencies and corporations as well as representatives from the 33 local government areas.

    Adeseun said the APC is the viable alternative to the PDP-led Federal Government, which has failed to take the nation out of the woods in the last 14 years of democracy.

    He hinged the group’s hope on the slogan of the new party: changing the phase of governance for a better Nigeria.

    According to him, the Ajimobi administration has been exemplary in the area of peace and security, which has returned to Oyo State since his assumption of office. He also acknowledged the sanitation and beautification of the environment, dualisation of major roads, youth empowerment, infrastructural development and other ongoing programmes of the government.

    Alli urged members to stay connected, adding that the APC would provide succour to the masses.

    He added: “APC is our party and we shall all work together to bring victory on all sides, from the federal down to the local level.”

    Akinlabi said the meeting was aimed at bringing all former ACN reform members closer to the government.

    Also, Yobe State Deputy Governor Abubakar Aliyu has said Nigeria would benefit from APC because of its good leadership.

    He said: “Good leadership alone can fix the problems of Nigeria and all the other problems of the country will be history.”

    The deputy governor told reporters in Damaturu, the state capital, that the selfless commitment of leaders of the various parties in the APC is exemplary.

    Aliyu said: “I want to say that the kind of leadership provided during this merger is the one that Nigeria needs. If we get it right through good leadership, the problems of Nigeria will be over.

  • Nigeria awaits WHO report  on guinea worm status

    Nigeria awaits WHO report on guinea worm status

    Is Nigeria guinea worm free? The answer will be known in a few days when the World Health Organisation (WHO) releases its report on the country’s guinea worm status following a verification.

    WHO’s International Certification Team was in Nigeria for two weeks, in June, to verify the Federal Ministry of Health’s report that the country is guinea worm free. After going round the states which normally record cases, the team did not find a single case. It was impressed but Nigeria, which last recorded a guinea worm case in 2008 was put on surveillance.

    Speaking on the awaited report, the National Coordinator, Nigeria Guinea worm Eradication Programme (NIGEP), Mrs Ifeoma Anagbogu, said: “Nigeria is sure to obtain the certificate because the WHO-certification team was in the country for more than two weeks and went round the states to verify the claim of non-existence of the disease for more than four years as the last case of guinea worm was reported on November 11, 2008. They found none.

    “The visit of the team is in tandem with the resolve by many organisations, including The Global 2000 programme of the Carter Centre of Emory University, UNICEF, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health Organisation (WHO) to help the last five countries in the world -Sudan, Ghana, Mali, Niger, and Nigeria to eradicate the disease. Since 1986, when an estimated 3.5 million people were infected annually, the campaign has eliminated much of the disease. The affected countries are aiming to eliminate guinea worm disease as soon as possible.

    “NIGEP is still encouraging people to search and report cases of guinea worm. They will be rewarded with N25, 000 cash for any confirmed case, while people could also call on a toll-free line: 0800 100 1000. Global eradication effort will make guinea worm the second disease to be eradicated; the first being small pox. The eradication of guinea worm disease campaign began in 1988.

    “At the inception of the eradication programme in 1988, 653,620 guinea worm cases were identified in 5,879 villages across the country. While it ravaged, guinea worm contributed to rural poverty depressingly affecting agricultural production, incapacitating the affected people and causing school absenteeism in children.”

    The Assistant National Coordinator of NIGEP and a member of the steering committee on eradication of guinea worm in Nigeria, Mr Babatunde Tokoya, said with concerted effort transmission of the disease has been interrupted and the ailment eliminated.

    According to Tokoya, 653,620 cases were identified at the inception in 1998 in 5,879 villages across Nigeria, “The last case was reported on November 11, 2008. In 2008, 38 guinea worm cases were reported in Nigeria.

    “From December 2008 till date – 52 months – Nigeria has maintained a zero guinea worm status. Nigeria marked the 2013 National GWD eradication. That was the last enlighten campaign before the visit of the international certification team to the country in June,” he noted.

    Any country that succeeds in eradicating guinea worm must receive the WHO certification, making it authentic that such country has truly eradicated the disease. Since 2008, when the last case of the disease was recorded, Nigeria has not received the certification, which implies that the country’s claim to have eradicated guinea worm does not have the WHO backing.”

     What is Guinea worm ?

     

    Dracunculiasis, more commonly known as Guinea worm disease (GWD), is a preventable infection caused by the parasite Dracunculus medinensis. Infection affects poor communities in remote parts of Nigeria that do not have safe water to drink.

    How does Guinea worm disease spread?

    Approximately one year after a person drinks contaminated water, the adult female guinea worm emerges from the skin of the infected person. Persons with worms protruding through the skin may enter sources of drinking water and unwittingly allow the worm to release larvae into the water. These larvae are ingested by microscopic copepods (tiny “water fleas”) that live in these water sources. Persons become infected by drinking water containing the water fleas harboring the Guinea worm larvae.

    How widespread is the problem?

    In 1986, the disease afflicted an estimated 3.5 million people a year in 21 countries in Africa and Asia. Today, thanks to the work of The Carter Center and its partners — including the countries themselves — the incidence of Guinea worm has been reduced by more than 99 per cent.

    Guinea worm disease incapacitates victims for extended periods of time making them unable to work or grow enough food to feed their families or attend school.

    How the disease is treated and infection is prevented?

    There is no known curative medicine or vaccine to prevent Guinea worm disease.

    Traditional removal of a Guinea worm consists of winding the worm — up to three feet (one metre) long — around a small stick and manually extracting it — a slow, painful process that often takes weeks. The skin lesions often develop secondary bacterial infections, which exacerbate the suffering and prolong the period of disability.

    The best way to stop Guinea worm disease is to prevent people from entering sources of drinking water with an active infection and to educate households to always use cloth filters to sieve out tiny water fleas carrying infective larvae.

    Educating communities about Guinea worm prevention is vital to stopping the spread of the disease.

    Guinea worm disease is set to become the second human disease in history, after smallpox, to be eradicated. It will be the first parasitic disease to be eradicated and the first disease to be eradicated without the use of a vaccine or medical treatment.

    Source: cartercenter.org

  • Can we build a  workable Nigeria?

    Can we build a workable Nigeria?

    I started my message of last week with the frustrating statement: “Being a citizen of Nigeria can often be a weird experience”. Today, I expand that statement. For any people or nation large or small, being a part of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is more than a weird experience. It can often be a debilitating experience. It ought not to be so; but it is so. Nigeria makes everything weaker and poorer. As someone put it some time ago, Nigeria is the only place where gold rusts.

    One can see it in every direction one cares to turn. I turn around and look at the late 1950s, the years when I was a young adult and a university undergraduate. And then I compare with the Nigeria of today. The contrast is so staggering that it can give a person a heart attack. Today, one hardly sees the spirit of enterprise and pride in Nigeria anywhere. What one sees most of the time is the spirit of hustling – a kind of soul-destroying hankering after some share in the petroleum money. You can see it on most faces.

    In the 1950s, life was joy and pride to live. Aside from the usual noise of politics and the politicians, society was bouncing in all directions. In all parts of our country, our farmers were blazing the trail to our country’s prosperity. Yoruba farmers led the pack. Countless thousands of them retreated into the deeper forests of the Yoruba farmlands and hacked out small cocoa plantations. Soon, they became the most productive African farmers on the African continent. Their cocoa exports became the largest source of Nigeria’s foreign exchange earnings, and the main provider of funds for the ambitious development programmes of the Western Region – Nigeria’s pace-setter region of that era. Farmers in the Eastern Region, led by Igbo farmers, poured out large quantities of palm oil and palm kernels to add to our country’s exports. Farmers in the large expanse of our Northern Region, led by the Hausa farmers, became the largest producers of groundnuts for the world market. Pictures of the groundnut pyramids in the city of Kano stood on our school walls all over Nigeria, and added enormously to our pride – the children of the great world power that was on the rise in Africa. In the schools in those days, our children had a litany that they memorized and proudly recited: Nigeria is the largest producer of this product in the world. Nigeria is the largest producer of that product in the world. Nigeria is the largest producer…

    The three regions of our federation were engaged in a spirited rivalry in those years. Each region was led by a group of patriots, some of whom served in elective positions, and the others in civil service positions. None of them thought that public office was the route to personal wealth; and all of them were eager to make great names for themselves and establish great heritages.

    Naturally, I knew my own Western Region the most. From all accounts, Chief Obafemi Awolowo and his team were giving us in the Western Region the most far-sighted, most sagacious, and most productive government, not only in Nigeria but in all of Africa. In our region’s Civil Service, a man named Chief Simeon Adebo, head of the Civil Service, was giving us one of the most professional, and one of the most dependable, governmental bureaucracies in the world. In nearly all areas of development, our Western Region was flying on eagle’s wings. We young people proudly called our Region “First in Africa”. But keeping in the front was by no means easy. The Eastern Region was chasing our Western Region very hard and very creditably. And though the Northern Region was starting with a handicap – low levels of education – it too was running unbelievably fast. For 500 years, the Blackman had suffered a poor image in the world. Here now came, at last, a Blackman’s county, Nigeria, to wash away that image.

    But today, all of that has crashed and vanished. On the faces of Nigerians, one doesn’t see the same confidence, the same push, the same resolve, the same air of the conqueror that one used to see. Most Nigerians are now slinking around to find some way to steal or to defraud, or some clever way to dissemble their act of begging, or actually begging shamelessly. Nigeria is back where the Blackman has been for five-hundred years among the races of the world – at the bottom.

    Why? What went wrong? We love power. We love riches. We love to acquire power and wealth, but we do not have any noble purposes for either. We would twist and distort political and societal order in order to grab power and wealth. But we have no noble purposes that we want to use the power and the wealth for. In our hands, power and wealth tend to become agencies of destruction.

    Look thoughtfully at the history of our country from 1952 to 1962, and then from 1962 to date, and you will see what I mean. Our British colonial overlords gave us some limited self –government in 1952, with continued supervision by British officials. As I said earlier on, our leaders (our Awolowos, Ahmadu Bellos and Azikiwes) made it work wonderfully. Their success was proof that this is something we can make a success of. Our sensible next step should have been to spread power out some more by giving the minorities in each a region a region of their own. But, even without our doing that, we were achieving considerable success.

    However, there was a safeguard – the continued presence of the British, which made sure that nobody could seek to grab more power than was provided for in the system. But, as soon as the British left in late 1960, the persons in control of the Federal Government wanted more powers. They now saw the regional governments as obstructions to the exercise of full federal power. And since then, the Federal Government has relentlessly grabbed power and rendered all sections of Nigeria subdued and impotent. Even our present president, President Goodluck Jonathan, himself from one of the most defiant peripheries of Nigeria, is enjoying reigning in the midst of the federal control of all power and the federally-generated chaos, corruption and poverty.

    In the 1950s, we lived to see our many peoples dipping deep into the resources of their culture to give our country prosperity and pride. By crushing and subduing our peoples, we have killed the spirit and the possibility of prosperity in our country.

    We can, if we try sincerely and hard, return to the possibilities that we had in the 1950s. But we are never likely to do that. The ones who want power at all costs are too good at manipulating the rest of us, and the rest of us are too lacking in perception to free ourselves from being manipulated. For instance, just look at our two large nations – the Yoruba and the Igbo. In all conceivable aspects of development and modernization, these two nations want, fundamentally, the same things in this world. Yet, the two are ever working against each other in the affairs of Nigeria – rather than working together and giving most of the rest of us the leadership we need to reorganize our country and return to orderliness and progress. Dr. Pius Ezeife recently said one of the truest and saddest things ever said in Nigerian politics. He said,“As a civil servant in Lagos, I observed the Nigerian politics and found Igbo and Yoruba going parallel lines in Nigeria politics. And as parallel lines, they will remain parallel slaves in Nigeria politics”. Many of us, different nations that desire a rational and workable federation for Nigeria, prefer to operate as parallel lines – and as parallel lines, we shall remain parallel paupers, beggars and slaves in a chaotic and poverty-ridden Nigeria.

    The answer is self-evident. We have to work together – work together not to get power for anybody or any group, but to put our country back on the path of order, sanity and prosperity in the world. We can do this. And if we are absolutely disinclined to do it, then, in the name of humanity, let us do the other self-respecting thing – namely, agree to part ways peacefully.

  • 2014 World Cup Qualifier: Nigeria guarantees security

    2014 World Cup Qualifier: Nigeria guarantees security

    The Nigeria Football Federation and the Office of the Inspector-General of Police, on Wednesday dispatched to world football-governing body, FIFA, a detailed security guarantee and comprehensive plan for security for next month’s 2014 FIFA World Cup qualifying match between the Super Eagles and Flames of Malawi in Calabar.

    In the letter signed on the IGP’s behalf by Deputy Inspector-General of Police Philemon I. Leha, the Nigeria Police assured “all stakeholders and lovers of football that the Force will provide adequate security to ensure a conducive environment before, during and after the match between Nigeria and Malawi scheduled for 7th September, 2013 at the U. J. Esuene Stadium, Calabar, Cross River State.”

    The 12,000-capacity stadium has hosted several international matches involving Nigeria in the past, including previous 2014 FIFA World Cup qualifiers against Namibia and Kenya, as well as 2013 Africa Cup of Nations qualifiers against Rwanda and Liberia. But the Football Association of Malawi, inexplicably, scurried to FIFA to express unfounded fears.

    NFF’s Acting General Secretary, Dr. Emmanuel Ikpeme, alongside Secretary of the NFF Security Committee, Dr. Christian Emeruwa, spent the better part of Wednesday at the Force Headquarters perfecting the security guarantee with top officers.

    The guarantee explained that apart from routine police lead escorts and back-up vehicles for both teams and match officials from point of arrival to point of departure, all hotels and training grounds to be used would be adequately fortified; anti-bomb squad would be deployed to sweep and maintain all hotels and training pitches; anti-bomb squad would sweep and secure the entire stadium along with Police elite squad (Police Mobile Force/Counter Terrorist Unit); adequate security would be provided on match day in the entire vicinity of the stadium and hotels of teams and match officials and; there would be police escorts for teams and match officials to and from stadium on match day, among other measures.

    The letter also informed FIFA that ACP Gideon Akinsola, FIFA National Security Officer in Nigeria, would be on duty at the big match.

    Next month’s game has assumed some importance as only two points separate the Super Eagles from the Flames at the top of Group F, with the Eagles needing only a draw to reach the 10-team final elimination round and the Malawians needing a win.

    FIFA had written to the Nigeria Football Federation on Monday to provide a letter of security guarantee from the appropriate authority in Nigeria as well as a detailed security plan for the qualifying match.