Tag: Nigeria

  • Nigeria: Time to reload

    Nigeria: Time to reload

    • By Matthew Hassan Kukah

    Dr. Reuben Abati is 60. This means he is much younger than our dear country Nigeria. However, his accomplishments in this very short period of time is one of the reasons why I am proud of what our country will still achieve, what my friend, Dr. Kayode Fayemi has described as Nigeria’s unfinished greatness. However, looking back, we must admit that standards have fallen in terms of what young Nigerians achieved before now especially in the area of the media. Remember the debonair, pacesetting Okpanam born, Chris Okolie who, at the age of 26, founded the scintillating Newbreed Magazine. Nduka Obaigbena followed by starting The Week at the age of 23. Peter Enahoro edited the Daily Times at the age of 24. Ernest Ikoli edited the Daily Times at a tender age. Anthony Enahoro was 26 when he moved the motion for Nigeria’s independence. Joseph Tarka entered the House of Representatives at the age of 26. So, when did the discount hunters come from? What happened? Today, an over 30 year old man or woman will have great difficulties becoming an Editor. Is the problem with the system or with the youths? Whatever it is, it is settled that a generation must seize its moment or lose history’s tide.

    Shakespeare says so in Julius Caesar:“There is a tide in the affairs of men,Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life

    Is bound in shallows and in miseries.” (Act IV, Scene iii)

    2: To reload is to start afresh. Nigeria’s “reload” must begin in the mind — a moral and imaginative renewal. In Milton’s Paradise Lost, we are told that “The mind is its own place, and in itself Can make a heaven of hell, a hell of heaven.” There are very many reasons why Nigeria must re-load. A marksman reloads for many reasons. First, he may have failed in his first attempt. May be the gun was not loaded. Maybe the gun was loaded but he was not good enough. Or, perhaps his object moved. Whatever may be the reasons for failure, you re-load and hope to correct the mistakes you may have made. You then go ahead to try again. Hitler was a lucky man. The 42 attempts to kill him all failed. No matter how many times we fail, we must continue to try.

    3: I encourage us to reload because missed targets offer us opportunities to rethink and recreate new options and opportunities. Francis Bacon said so: “He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils; for time is the greatest innovator.” No matter how much one loves this country, we cannot explain away all the opportunities we have missed. Although we cannot turn back the hands of time, as they say, even a bad clock is right twice a day. However, we can at least attempt to journey together as pilgrims of hope, learning from the mistakes of the past and seeking to dream new dreams. National greatness lies in identifying and correcting past mistakes, not focusing on recrimination and self-flagellation.

    3. Nationalism, it is said, requires memory, and memory requires reverence. Nineteenth Century Canadian poet and journalist, Joseph Howe, had a counsel here: “A wise nation preserves its records, gathers up its monuments, decorates the tombs of its illustrious dead, repairs its greatest structures and fosters national pride and love of country by perpetual references to the sacrifices and glories of the past.” The Chinese celebrate their one-year long march that covered about 6000 kilometers. The Voortrekkers Monument in Kwazulu Natal, South Africa, stands as testimony of the victory of the 464 Afrikaaners who, on December 16th, 1836 (known as the day of the vow), defeated over 20,000 Zulus at the Battle of the Blood River and took over the land! July 4th is America’s independence day because that is the day that the Declaration of Independence was adopted. Thanksgiving Day celebrated on the last Thursday of every November, draws inspiration from the first action by the pilgrim fathers and their local Indian population way back in 1621. Normandy Day is marked every June 6th every year to remember the military operations that ended with the defeat of the Nazis. These events often re-enkindle memories that help to inspire and reinforce nationalism. Edmund Burke in ‘Reflections on the Revolution in France’ wrote that “People will not look forward to posterity who never look backward to their ancestors.” Nationalism is a tree that must be watered. Can you name one single event that Nigerians get excited about?

    4. Nigeria is a nation of paradox; a nation of greatly gifted people full of potential, yet we are a mass of people mired in disillusionment. Why? We look at our politics and we wonder, will we ever get it right? What stories, myths or memories does Nigeria have to inspire patriotism among us? Which sacrifices and labours of our leaders past can we draw inspiration from? Nigeria has become a country permanently on a boiler plate of self-doubt and almost self-abnegation. A country at war with itself. We think about the endless border wars, the severe fracture even in social networks and we wonder, when will we all live in peace among ourselves? When will we create minimum standards of welfare that will ensure that we can take the basic things of a good life for granted. For example, safe maternal and infant maternal environments, ending hunger and destitution, basic standard of education for all our children? We ask, when will the almost 60,000 abandoned projects spread across Nigeria ever be completed? Given the staggering rate and range of our economic hemorrhage through illicit financial flows, we ask ourselves, when will we achieve some level of economic equilibrium? With citizens retreating into the womb of ethnicity, with religion becoming the source of inspiration for violence and death, our questions are many and all-encompassing with very little answers. It is an open question whether can successfully reach a finishing line. Perhaps, in the end, we have to come to terms with the fact that there are really no final destination in the dream of nations. In the end, it is more a question of holding together and believing that no matter the turbulence, our eyes are still set on the dreams of building a united nation.

    5: Perhaps we may need to ask questions such as, where did all go wrong? Or was it wrong from the beginning? If so, which beginning? We know that every modern country today has its own peculiar history. None has been free from the savagery of conquerors, oppressors, or enslavers. If we are to start from the beginning, we will have to start from the Garden of Eden. Yet, even there, no sooner had God placed the first two human creatures Adam and Eve in the garden than trouble started over obedience to just one commandment. The first family had only two children, yet, with no external provocation from any neighbour, the first murder took place. Here, we draw the first lesson that, living together even as a family has its challenges. A peaceful Nigeria should be measured not by the absence of problems, rather, the existence of platforms that enable citizens to feel a sense of fairness.

    6: Nations live with the oxygen that they draw from the myths of identity, myths of great men and women who came before. The myths are often constructed around their struggles. They become the vehicles for legitimation and validation, their memories inspire sacrifice and pride. Telling and re-telling them inspires the next generation and they become embedded in memory and often form part of what is called, civil religion. These myths and the telling of them help to inspire the next generation which often passes them to the next generation. This is what Moses meant when he enjoined the people of Israel to remember the word of God; when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise. You shall bind them on your hands, and between your eyes. You shall write them on them on the doorpost of your house (Dt. 6: 7-8). Every country today speaks about the dreams or the visions of its founding fathers, those men and women whose sacrifices brought them to where they are. Some of these men and women have been elevated almost to the status of demigods. Legitimacy of certain decisions has to be aligned to the thinking of these great men and women. Myths and anthologies are often deployed to ensure that their lives continue to inspire the nation. Today, think of the lessons of the great Nelson Mandela.

    7: When the United States of America speak of their founding fathers, they refer to; Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, John Jay, Alex Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson. Despite his fame, Abraham Lincoln is not considered a founding father as he came much later. Their memories are sustained against the backdrop of the myths constructed about them over time. These founding fathers gave the country the Declaration of Independence (1776) and wrote the nation’s Constitution (1878. Independence came after almost a hundred years. However, the inspiration for what forms the foundations of America values derives from multiple sources.

    Read Also: Unending rape terror: Ochanya and other tales of abuse of Nigerian girl child

    8: Primarily, the Bible formed the furnace upon which all the inspiration of the founding fathers was hammered. Along with the Bible was the inspiration derived from philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Jock Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Montesquieu, Immanuel Kant, Jean Jacques Rosseau, Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Thomas Paine among many others. These philosophers propounded different theories about life, death, society, government, peace, war and justice. They debated the role of the state, ensuring individual safety and the pursuit of happiness. Was society above or beneath government? People like John Locke believed that society was more important than government and that the business of government was to protect the freedom of the individual, hence the notion of limited government.

    9: Issues of freedom, the individual and government have dominated politics. For example, how much of human freedom can the state take from the individual and for what? Rosseau, due to the circumstances of his personal life, feared freedom and believed that more power should be in the hands of the state. Ceding much power to the people could lead to anarchy and mob violence. The Leviathan, as he called the state, should be given so much power that it can enjoy unlimited protection. Left on his own devices, Rosseau argued, individuals could descend to a state of nature where, unrestrained, life could be nasty, brutish and short. Philosophers like Immanuel Kant share Rosseau’s sentiments because he argued for total obedience to the state’s authority on the grounds that either way, it was better to have even a bad state with bad laws than to have no state and no laws! Successive governments in the United States have revolved around these values.

    10: The 1630 sermon of John Winthrop, first Governor of the Massachusetts Bay colony, an English Puritan lawyer provided the foundation for the development of these moral sentiments on which the founding fathers would continue to build. It was in the sermon that he conceived of the new colony as a city on the hill, drawing inspiration from the exhortation of Jesus that a city set on a hill cannot be hidden (Mt. 5:14). Drawing from Prophet Micah, he enjoined his people in the sermon to act justly, love tenderly and to walk humbly with our God. These sentiments account for the deep moral fibre of the American polity. Today, these sentiments formed the moral foundation for such expressions in the American public psyche as: In God we Trust, Manifest destiny, God’s own country,

    11: Subsequently, after the war, the Declaration of Independence evokes these emotions when it said: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Today, America holds these values and vision with near sacredness. They provide the guardrails for ensuring the preservation of the vision of their founding fathers. They account for the near sacredness attached to the Constitution. Taken together with the principles of separation of powers, they have made the country the most powerful nation on earth, whatever may be the controversies of the moment.

    12: The Chinese on the other hand have built their civilization and by extension the social and political fabric of their country around the philosophical teachings of Confucius, the 5th century Chinese philosopher. The Analects, the collection of some of his teachings read like the Book of Wisdom in the Bible. For example, in what sounds almost like the golden rule, Confucius says, Never impose on others what you will not choose for yourself. Drawing from Confucius, the Chinese have developed their politics around what is called, the Doctrine of the Mean. The philosophy of the mean enjoins people to avoid excesses and extremes, to seek balance and moderation. Using the pendulum as a model, this teaching assumes that extremism should be avoided while balance and equilibrium should be sought. Virtue is what helps to manage these extremes. This is why, even though China is a multiparty Democracy, it has ensured that its so-called Democracy functions within the boundaries of doctrine of the mean, seeing opposition as an extreme from the mean.

    13: Many people will be surprised to hear that China can claim to have a multiparty political system. Yes, they do. These parties are little surrogates who survive on the basis of what the Chinese Communist Party, CCP, calls, multi-party cooperation and political consultation under the leadership of the CCP. Yes, China is a multi-party country and there is even one party called, China Democratic League. The only right that these parties have is the right to accept the supremacy of the CCP. We can go on and on about other countries around the world. The point here is that every country has its history.

    14: So, coming to our country Nigeria, the question now is, who are our founding fathers? What was the founding philosophy? What is it about their lives that we can hold up to for inspiration today? As a former British colony, Nigeria’s history of growth and development reads quite differently. Written largely in the smoke-filled rooms of British subterfuge, some of these intrigues have been well documented in very many books. The Harold Smith Story: A Squalid End to Empire tells part of this gory story. Dele Ogun’s A Fatherless People demonstrates how Nigeria came to be an ideological orphan, lacking in a source of moral authority for its national development. Mr. Ogun speaks eloquently about things that might have been in our politics, had the British not done all they did to manipulate outcomes to favour northern Nigeria. We are still paying the price. “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past” (George Orwell:1984).

    15: In form and content, we have remained what the British sculpted of us. For example, while in the United Kingdom as a student, Mr. Obafemi Awolowo had fallen under the spell of Fabianism. This left-wing group made up of Socialists who congregated around its philosophy would later become the launch pad for the Labour Party. The Fabian Society founded the London School of Economics and Political Science in 1895. It inspired such legendary leaders like Jawaharl Nehru and Lee Kwan Yew, 50 former Heads of States and 20 Nobel Laureates. Such a man like Awolowo, inspired by the Labour Party would naturally have struck anxiety to Harold McMillan of the Conservative Party who was then the British Prime Minister as Nigeria prepared for independence.

     Mr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, having been exposed to the radical politics of the United States (itself a former British colony) posed a similar threat. These explain the maneuverings that ensured that neither of these two emerged to lead Nigeria after independence.

    16: Today, we all recall the anecdotal account of the imagined conversation between Nnamdi Azikiwe and the Sardauna regarding the future of the country. As it went, Nnamdi Azikiwe pleaded with Sardauna that they should sink their differences in other to build a united nation together. The Sardauna was said to have told Nnamdi Azikiwe that it was more important to understand the differences rather than forgetting them. The difference between forgetting and remembering still haunts us till date. Today, these three key leaders were unable to reconcile their differences and find areas of agreement beyond merely struggling for independence. Even at that, the famous crisis around the date for Nigeria’s independence between the three, the debate between the Sardauna’s as soon as possible position and the famous Tony Enahoro’s motion for independence in 1956.

    19: For example, in the case of India, the British bowed to pressure from the Muslim minority and decided to create Pakistan for the Muslims. Nigerians vehemently rejected this choice and pooh-poohed against what they called then, the Pakistanisation of Nigeria. The Minority ethnic groups in the Middle Belt and in Southern Nigeria were suffocating from the asphyxiating chokehold of the dominant ethnic groups in the north, east and west. In response to their pleas, the British set up what they called, a Minority’s Commission in 1958 to enquire into the fears of Minorities. Their brief was to listen to the fears of these minorities and figure out how to allay them. The creation of the Mid-West in 1963 was not done in good faith because the real idea was to reduce Chief Awolowo’s influence in the region. The fears of the northern Minorities over the threat to their cultural and religious identity were ignored because the northern region claimed that their fears would be addressed. When we look back now, we must ask, could things have been different from what they are today?

    20: As we prepare to re-load, what are the key issues for today? There will of course be as many answers as those that are asked. I will try to conclude by identifying just three or so key areas that I believe we need to focus on. First, is the problem of national cohesion which has remained, as I have said elsewhere, an illusion. Our coat of arms loudly proclaims, Unity & Faith, Peace & Progress. I leave you to rank which of these ideals we have been able to achieve. We have neither unity nor faith, neither peace nor have we made progress commensurate with our opportunities. I am not about to offer you the answers, but what I wish to do here is to say, if we are to re-load, what must we do differently? Our inability to successfully achieve any of these ideals is what we now call insecurity. To that extent, it is plausible to argue that our insecurity is the result of our lack of unity and faith which have made peace and progress impossible. To re-load, I propose we look at five key themes

    21: First, what is the future of our Constitutional Democracy? Ours has been a severely flawed Democracy by every stretch of the imagination. I do not know if we can find consolation in the fact that the crisis around Democracy is itself an international malaise. If it is any consolation, a recent Pew Foundation survey examined the state of Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Democracy around the world. The revelations show that Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States, all registered a median of 64% adults saying they are dissatisfied with Democracy while 35% said that they were satisfied. Only two African countries are measured in the survey and they are, Kenya and South Africa which both registered between 58% and 63% dissatisfaction and against 42% and 33% satisfaction respectively. On dissatisfaction with Democracy, it is interesting that India ranks the highest with 23%, followed by Sweden which is 25%.

    22: In a Washington Times article on the 24th October, 2025, titled, Democracy Faces a Crisis of Faith, Dr. Fareed Zakarias concluded that: Fifty years ago, people doubted their governments. Today, they doubt each other. The next democratic revival will not come from clever managers or technocratic reforms. It will come from a rediscovery of trust—the invisible rule that makes all others possible. Until we can believe again that the referee is trying to be fair, we will keep shouting ‘Ref, you suck!’ at our own democracy— and then wonder why the game no longer feels worth playing.

    23: Democratic reversals should be seen as temporary and we must work hard to renew our peoples’ faith in it, despite its many flaws. With all its flaws, our commitment to Democracy as a people is irreversible as we can see from the cold reactions to the recent news of a purported military coup. This same coldness is seen in the lack of enthusiasm about the Sahelian states of Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso. What we need to do is to think more seriously about the nature of the choices and the processes that drive Democracy. Here, I mean Political Parties and Electoral Management Bodies.

    24: There is a lot of talk about the need for free, fair and credible elections. It is however important to note that although free, fair and credible elections are necessary, they are not sufficient to guarantee or deliver on good governance and what we have come to loosely refer to as dividends of Democracy. For example, on July 29, 1981, the world stood still as millions around the world were glued to the television as they watched Prince Charles and Lady Diana get married at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London. It was, you would say, with the pomp and pageantry, one of the greatest events of that year, and, a fairytale marriage made in heaven as they say. Fifteen years later, precisely on August 28, 1996, the marriage ended in divorce! So, outcomes are often not determined by processes.

    25: The challenge to our Democracy is the conduct and lack of honesty and sincerity by the political actors who have come to see politics as a ladder that can be used to ascend to higher office. Electoral malfeasance has been inserted into the process. Accountability still remains a serious problem. However, one of the most troubling problems is the issue of the culture of defections by elected officials who are often driven by a sense of opportunism and the need to be close to honey pot of power. We will not resolve these matters merely by moral appeal. Amendments to our electoral laws must go beyond merely tinkering with the laws. The amendments in the laws must identify, isolate and target certain remedies. I will use two examples from Ghana to illustrate the point.

    26: Under the Ghana Election Commission for example, once you cross the carpet, you lose your seat and elections in which the defector cannot contest, must hold within 42 days for a replacement. Second, the Speaker of the Parliament is appointed by the President not elected by the House. The appointment can come from even outside the political parties. In this way for example, the idea that defectors must write to the Speaker can be remedied.

    27: The second issue is what to do with the Constitution or the spirit of Constitutionalism, the secular scriptural text that must provide moral guidance for the affairs of state. Largely, Constitutional Amendment has become a project and a ritual of each National Assembly. In a provocative Memo, my friend, Olisa Agbakoba has likened the process as merely repairing a cracked foundation with patches. In his view, 25 years of Constitutional tinkering has produced no transformation. The result is that Elections occur, but power remains concentrated. Parties exist, but without genuine ideological differentiation. A Constitution governs but without federal substance. His proposals, he argues, if accepted can see Nigeria itself with a budget of N500 trillion Naira capacity. He proposes that his project should form the basis for interrogation of candidates in the 2027 elections.

    28: Although I am persuaded by the strength of the argument, his arguments focus on assumptions that do not address realistically, the nature of the field of play. The questions for the 2027 elections may not be exhaustive, but they mistake the cause for the consequence. We are supposed to ask all candidates, if they will deliver on the enlisted items. All the 10 questions start with, Will you…? It is like asking a groom on the altar, will you love this woman, will you be faithful to her? Of course this is the easy part and he will naturally simply tick yes in all the boxes. Elections are a process and they are different from governance. A wedding is a ceremony. It is not a marriage. The real part is living out the words uttered. And here, Agbakoba’s thesis should focus not on asking the “will you” question, but the “how” question. The text also does not address the resistant nature of the landscape that is suffused with such cultural anomalies as Democracy sitting side by side with traditional institutions, especially given that today, in the northern states, at least, they are already taking a chunk of local government resources. It is an exceptionally well written memo and should provoke a conversation. If it is not to be a mere talkshop, Dr Agbakoba must define the processes of his team selection.

    29: What leaders do we need, who do we need, where and when? It is tempting to ask if the age of the strong man, the dictator, the autocrat, the one who brooked no nonsense, the one whose word was law are gone. The answer is no, because in the words of Anne Applebaum in her book, ‘Autocracy Inc: The Dictators who want to Rule the World’, says, there is a network of dictators who share common interests and not common ideology. Nowadays, autocracies are not run by one bad guy but by sophisticated networks relying on kleptocratic financial structures, a complex of security services, military and paramilitary, police and technological experts who provide surveillance, propaganda and disinformation.

    30: We need a Judiciary that spends less energy on becoming what Chidi Odinkalu calls a Selectorate which topples the will of the people. In the book, ‘The Selectorate: When Judges Topple the People’, Prof Odinkalu argues that: “the judiciary has evolved from constrained arbiters over political disputes to unconstrained determinants of the location and site for the mandate of to rule…the Judiciary has relocated the site of electoral legitimacy from voters to judges and from the ballot box to the court room.”

    31: The judiciary needs to be extricated from the tangled web of politics. There is need to find the means to make the judiciary focus more on securing the rights to justice for our people. Nigeria needs another arm of the judiciary dedicated to delivering Justice to the politicians and their parties. We need a more robust engagement between the Bar and the Bench in extending the frontiers of Justice to our people. Bodies like the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People, NCAAP, and recently, the Black Lives Matter Movement have all demonstrated that with activist Judges of the Supreme Court such as Thurgood Marshall, the ‘Notorious’ Ruth Bader Ginsberg all of blessed memory, the frontiers of Justice can be extended.

    32: Nigeria needs a mapping programme that tries to use effective intelligence to forecast and geolocate its strategic place in the world. So far, we seem to have no roadmap for positioning ourselves and helping to lift up Africa. All this idea of government by marabouts, shamans, all this blood of sacrifice of protective gear against enemies, slaughtering of cross bred cows, donkeys, camels, cats with three legs, one eye, no tail, black tongue and so on will not cut it.

    32: Nigeria needs to address the issues of values, the kind of values that could have helped to find a moral balance in our chaotic social world. Asian politicians, intellectuals and businessmen have sought to embed these teachings in their fabric of their society. The Chinese, are inspired by the teachings of Confucius. These teachings focus on family, respect for elders, obedience to cultural norms, etiquette, moral uprightness and virtue and contribution to social harmony. Indians on the other hand, for the Indians, their moral orbit revolves around the Mahabhrata and the Upanishad which constitute some of the theology around Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism. The Japanese concept of seppuku is based on the notion of shame. This is what drove Roh Myu-hun to take his own life in 2009 when he was accused of corruption. Asian scholars and statesmen such as Amartya Sen and Mohammed Mahathir have debated the idea of Asian values in contrast with those of the west. For example, some countries have argued that rather than dwelling on Gross National Product as a way of measuring development, they propose a measurement of Gross National Happiness, GNH as a basis of development. These debates are important for framing and laying down long lasting development strategies that ensure that mere infrastructures do not replace human beings.

    33: For us in Nigeria, our political life is bereft of African cultural input, largely because of the way we approached western civilization and modernity. Today, the idea of Ubuntu (I am because you are) has been bandied as a way of defining who we are as Africans. This is in sharp contrast to the xenophobia that has been the hallmark of life in South Africa. African politics has tended to shy away from a rigorous and scientific review of what we consider to be our culture. Rather than rigorous scholarship, African politics tends to lapse into the dark world of shamanism, sorcery, charms, where the marabouts hold sway through their incantations.

    34: To re-load our politics, Nigeria needs to rethink how to rescue our country from the clutches of the dark forces of all forms of extremist ideologies. If Nigeria does not confront the demon of weaponized religion, we may have no country because those who weaponize religion are a greater danger to the religion itself. Nigeria must be a country of one people under one law. To this end, I again appeal to the President. He went to court to cure the injustice that has encouraged corruption in regards to the funds of Local Government Councils. He should go to the Supreme Court to seek a proper interpretation of the implications of the adoption of Sharia Courts in the 12 northern states. Victims of the manipulation of religion constitute over 90% of believers. The encircling steps of the angels of death and doom are here. We have been calling and crying for years. Northern Christians raised these issues before independence, but political expediency by the British colonial state denied them fair hearing. Now, this demon has come back to haunt us. If Nigeria does not kill the dragon of religious extremism, it will be only a matter of time before we become a larger Gaza. Supremacists who hide under religion must have no place in our social and political life. The time to deal with this problem is now, the place to start is here. So, thank you, President Donald Trump for the blowout and throwing an unexploded hand grenade our way. I hope we have a chance to act before it explodes. All Nigerians must walk tall and confident through the length and breadth of this great land.

    •          Excerpts from keynote address delivered at the 60th birthday celebration of Dr Reuben Abati at the National Institute for International Affairs, Victoria Island, Lagos on 7th November, 2025.
  • Nigeria and the challenging times

    Nigeria and the challenging times

    On many occasions, the world’s most populous black nation, Nigeria, has passed through  dreadful and challenging moments that taxed the ability of its successive leaders and the adaptive capabilities of its diverse people.

    The country survived the mistrust of the 1950s, the political upheaval of the turbulent sixties, the destructive civil war, the dark period of the botched Third Republic, years of pestilence and global recession, and predictions of disintegration by foreign agencies.

    Nigeria’s major problem today is insecurity, occasioned by the persistent activities of terrorists, bandits, cattle rustlers, commercial kidnappers targeting ransom, and other agents of violence across the North.

    The threats to national peace by these unpatriotic elements are worrisome. Also disheartening are other forms of inhumanity of man to man in the South, as manifested by the activities of armed robbers, ritual killers and deadly ‘sit-at-home’ enforcers who maim, kill and destroy socio-economic activities.

    Peace has taken flight in many communities where the rich and the commoners hitherto coexisted in harmony. Murders are on the increase, despite efforts by the government to halt the embarrassing trend. Everybody is a target, a potential victim – physically, socially, economically and emotionally – whether Christians or Muslims.

    Across the globe, attention may have shifted to Nigeria, now a troubled nation that still shoulders enormous regional and continental responsibilities, despite the constraints.

    READ ALSO:FULL FACTS: New U.S. bill titled: “Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025” by Senator Ted Cruz

    The searchlight and warning by the United States President Donald Trump may, in the final analysis, be a blessing in disguise. It is like a renewed wake-up call from afar in a world that has become a global village. The message of the American leader to Nigerian leaders is that they should put their house in order, rekindle efforts at liberating the country from the jaws of terror and create an enabling environment for all and sundry to thrive.

    Foreign relations require tact; a rare application of intelligence. Diplomacy requires in-depth skills, knowledge and mobilisation of networks. Only seasoned and experienced envoys can handle the sensitive assignment.

    But the situation at the home front is also crucial. Foreign policy is dictated by the home condition. Emergency experts in international relations are thrown up by the current circumstances. They are trying to twist facts and score cheap political points, oblivious of the fact that the more they dent the image of their country on social media, the more its reputation in the comity of nations is impaired.

    This is the time for Nigerians, irrespective of their political differences, religious leanings and ethnic backgrounds, to unite and stand against the deviants and unpatriotic elements consistently giving the country a nightmare for nearly two decades.

    The terrorists may be partly Nigerians and partly foreigners. Their capacity for consistent onslaught shows that their financial backers are not relenting. Nigerians – the government and the people – have to rise up to them.

    There is a clear understanding that the government of Bola Ahmed Tinubu, a little above two and a half years in office, is not responsible for the tragedy. The problems were inherited from the preceding administrations, whose leadership also tried their best to rid the country of the menace. It is also indisputable that government has made a concerted effort to halt the carnage. But the problem has persisted.

    Although ethnic and religious sentiments persist, the Tinubu administration comes across as a symbol of religious harmony and national unity that should be improved upon. President Tinubu legitimately holds the people’s mandate, and there is no national ethnic or religious discord that would have led to any genocide against any ethnic group or religious sect. He is a Muslim-husband of a Christian cleric-wife in a family that showcases the beauty of accommodation, religious tolerance, freedom of worship, association, and assembly.

    It is good that the Federal Government has reacted to the allegation of genocide against Christians by properly clarifying the circumstances that heralded the misrepresentation and misunderstanding of the true picture of the war by terrorists against all Nigerians – Muslims and Christians – in the North. It is a bad idea to view the current scenario as a major confrontation between the United States and Nigeria or between Trump and Tinubu.

    What makes it appear that Christians are the major or exclusive targets is that Christian bodies are more vociferous and confrontational in their responses to the killings, with further amplification by their networks abroad, unlike their hapless Muslim brothers and sisters at home, who submit to divine will.

    It is certain that since Muslims are in the larger population in the Northeast and the Northwest, most victims are likely to be Muslims in a terrain where insurgents and bandits kill indiscriminately. The conclusion that more Christians die from the unprovoked and unwarranted attacks needs to be objectively scrutinised.

    Nigeria needs to show depth and determination in handling the unfolding situation so that it does not risk further division between Christians and Muslims, who are collective victims of the current danger.

    What is discernible from the critical foreign intervention is that a baseline has been created for seeking a wider global support for tackling the mounting terror challenge, which is not peculiar to Nigeria.

    Speed is required. At a time the economy is improving and relief is not far in sight, Nigeria cannot afford to suffer reverses. The warning by the U.S. has implications for the investment drive and supply of aids. There would be fear of alienation. Diplomatic relations built over the years would be ruptured and the unfolding scenario might inadvertently pale into uncritical isolation or alienation of Nigeria, which has been a key partner in counter-terrorism and great factor in regional stability in West Africa and the entire African continent.

    It is possible that Nigerians in the Diaspora are worried and they may be eager to plead, on behalf of the government and people of Nigeria, for more understanding and assistance in terms of arms supply to combat the terrorists.

    Nigeria deserves the sympathy of humanity at this trying period. There is no evidence that this calamity is self-induced or brought by the government of the day. External influences cannot be ruled out. The North is a vast region sharing porous borders with a number of West African countries – Niger, Chad, Cameroon, and Benin Republic. Insurgent groups, identified and unidentified, visible or invisible, operate across the regions, apparently shifting bases and regressing to the crude tactics of targeting vulnerable populations whenever they are destabilised, before regaining strength.

    Also, some occasional bloody ethnic clashes that led to deaths of innocent Nigerians should not be confused with the onslaughts by Boko Haram and ISWAP.

    The war against insurgency should now be fought with much more vigour. It would be costly, but it is non-negotiable. More resources – human, financial, and military – have to be deployed until the desired result is attained. More recruitments in the military, equipment and much intelligence gathering are required.

    At the diplomatic level, there is a need for more engagements with the world powers, particularly the U.S., the Evangelical bloc, whose outcry led to the U.S. searchlight on Nigeria, and more coordinated strategy with neighbouring countries. It is also time to appoint envoys to major Western countries and the United Nations (UN).

    The immediate creation and effective activation of state police has become most urgent. It is the security structure for coordinating intelligence gathering in particular. The situation has become compelling for all hands to be on deck in the fight against the enemies of state, the terrorists and other agents of destabilisation.

  • Festival on Nigeria’s creative energy, cultural heritage for Dec 3-7

    Festival on Nigeria’s creative energy, cultural heritage for Dec 3-7

    Africa’s first sustainable recycling festival, Artistic Pulse Festival (APF) is set to celebrate the best of Nigeria’s creativity, culture, and commerce. 

    Scheduled from December 3-7 at the Remembrance Arcade, Tafawa Balewa Square (TBS), Lagos, the festival promises to be a vibrant display of art, music, fashion, food, film, and technology.

    The five-day festival will feature symposiums, debates, creative workshops, a children’s art gallery and play zone as well as performances from local and international artists. 

    It aims to promote sustainability through recycling initiatives, underscoring the role of creativity in environmental responsibility.

    Themed: “Footprints of Interconnectivity, Growth and Expansion: Creativity, Culture, Commerce and Innovation,” APF aims to fuse entertainment with sustainability, offering a platform for young creatives, entrepreneurs, and local communities to connect and thrive.

    Convener of the festival who doubles as Vice Chair NACCIMA Creative Economy and Immediate past Chairperson LCCI Creative and Entertainment Group, Dr Ngozi Omambala AMBP-UN, highlighted the event’s role in bridging Nigeria’s creative ecosystem with global markets. 

    Omambala, a seasoned creative professional and member of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) and NACCIMA, stressed that the festival seeks to position Nigeria’s creative industry as a major economic driver.

    “We need festivals like this to be put on the map so that we can create tourism, create jobs, and drive the community with trade fairs where everybody contributes positively to the economy,” she said.

    Omambala, who has worked extensively across the African entertainment landscape, explained that the Artistic Pulse Festival was born from the need to integrate and streamline Nigeria’s creative sectors — from art to fashion, music to film — into a coherent, growth-driven industry.

    “Our creative sectors are on the global map,” she said. “We’re generating tourism, generating jobs. With a population of 230 million and 60 to 70 percent under 30, we have a huge human capital resource. It’s about belief, collaboration, partnerships, and creativity — being at one with everybody.”

    She also addressed the growing trend of Nigerian artists performing more abroad than at home, urging them to reconnect with their roots.

    “It’s not a criticism, it’s an observation,” Omambala stated. “We love to see our artists abroad, but we also need them at home. That’s why the strapline for the Artistic Pulse Festival is ‘Home is where the heart is.’ It goes on to say, ‘Join the movement. Feel the pulse.’”

    Ms. Yemisi Ransome-Kuti, co-founder of Lagos Island Connect and long-time advocate for local development, described the festival as “an expose of the soul of a city.”

    She said, “Every aspect of human activity is focused on, enlarged, portrayed, and projected to the world, this is like you as a person telling the world, ‘Come, this is who I am. Come and feel us. Come and enjoy and savour the gorgeous and awesome things we have to offer as a nation in this venue.”

    Ransome-Kuti emphasized the importance of the festival in strengthening community ties and creating opportunities for economic and social inclusion.“It is important to engage and ensure that this activity benefits the community. It impacts the environment positively. The investment and the benefits that come out of it should not just be for the organisers, but for the entire community locally in the short term and then in the long term as well,” she noted.

    Chairman of Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), Gabriel Idahosa highlighted the sole importance of promoting the Nigerian culture, using home made products as the country gears towards a sustainable economy.

    He said, “Promoting Nigerian culture and embracing locally made products is not just an act of patriotism — it is a strategic investment in our nation’s economic future. Every time we choose Nigerian goods, we create jobs, empower entrepreneurs, and strengthen the value of our heritage. Our culture and creativity are among our greatest assets, and showcasing them to the world is key to building a more inclusive and sustainable economy.”

    Also speaking at the briefing, Ms. Shade Bembatoum-Young, Honorary Life Vice President of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), emphasized the festival’s significance in promoting Nigerian-made products and preserving cultural identity.

    “Nigeria’s cultural values are rooted in community, creativity, and craftsmanship,” she said. “Promoting homegrown products is not just about economics — it’s about pride in who we are. The Artistic Pulse Festival celebrates that spirit by showcasing local innovation and sustainable enterprise on a global stage.”

  • Tinubu urges global allies to stand with Nigeria in intensified war against terrorism

    Tinubu urges global allies to stand with Nigeria in intensified war against terrorism

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has called on Nigeria’s international allies to stand firmly with the country as his administration amplifies its campaign against terrorism and other forms of violent criminality threatening national peace and development.

    The President made the call in a post on his verified X handle, @officialABAT, on Friday, affirming that Nigeria will spare no effort in eradicating the scourge of terror and reclaiming the safety and dignity of its people.

    “We will spare no effort and leave no stone unturned in our mission to eliminate criminals from our society. We urge our allies to stand firmly with us as we amplify our fight against terrorism. We have made significant progress in the past two years, and we will decisively eliminate this threat,” the President declared.

    He assured that his administration remains unyielding in its resolve to defeat terrorism, restore order, and preserve national unity, noting that security remains a non-negotiable cornerstone of the Renewed Hope Agenda.

    “We are indeed faced with terrorism, a challenge Nigeria has faced for almost two decades, and we will not back down. We will decisively defeat terrorism and claim victory in this battle. Security is non-negotiable, and we will never compromise on this principle. With unwavering courage and a steadfast commitment to the rule of law, we will prevail,” he said.

    Tinubu also reaffirmed Nigeria’s readiness to continue working with the international community to strengthen both security and economic growth, describing the country as a reliable and steady partner in the global pursuit of peace and stability.

    “Nigeria will be, and remain, a reliable partner and dependable ally to its friends, and a steady voice for stability. We welcome the collaboration and support of our allies, friends, and partners as we strengthen both security and economic growth,” he noted.

    The President said his government’s diplomacy is driven by confidence, clarity, and purpose, with Nigeria asserting its position as a responsible player on the global stage while confronting internal and transnational security threats.

    “We face challenges head-on and remain steadfast in our commitment to engage partners and champion Nigeria’s interests on the diplomatic front. We are confidently asserting our presence on the global stage, guided by unwavering calm, clarity, and a strong sense of purpose,” he said.

    Tinubu further reaffirmed his faith in Nigeria’s unity and collective resilience, urging citizens to reject despair and remain steadfast in the national mission to secure a safer, stronger, and more prosperous future.

    “Nigeria is one united family. We rise together, move forward together, and reject despair in favour of determination. Our future is far more robust and stronger than any fears we may have,” he wrote.

    Acknowledging the sacrifices of the armed forces and security operatives across the country, the President paid tribute to those who have given their lives in the line of duty and praised their courage as a source of national strength.

    “To the brave men and women of our armed forces and intelligence community united by purpose, regardless of tribe or religion, who serve fearlessly, fight side-by-side and sometimes pay the ultimate price, we express our deepest gratitude. Your commitment is our strength in the fight against terror,” Tinubu stated.

    The President concluded with a message of hope and assurance that the administration’s reform momentum will continue to deliver results for all Nigerians, stressing that the nation’s resolve to overcome its challenges remains unshakable.

    “The task ahead is immense, yet our resolve is even greater. We will continue to sustain and build on our reform gains and deliver a prosperous and inclusive Nigeria. With courage and the rule of law, we will triumph,” he affirmed.

  • ​FULL FACTS: New U.S. bill titled: “Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025” by Senator Ted Cruz

    ​FULL FACTS: New U.S. bill titled: “Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025” by Senator Ted Cruz

    As part of its response to Nigeria’s alleged violations, the United States Congress is considering a bill that would impose severe sanctions on Governors, public officials, and non-state actors.

    The bill, sponsored by Republican Senator Ted Cruz, has passed second reading and been referred to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for further consideration.

    The draft legislation, S. 2747, dated September 9, 2025, is titled ‘Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025.’

    It builds directly on House Resolution 594, a companion motion in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, and which is co-sponsored by 18 Republican Party lawmakers.

    The bill cites data from Open Doors’ World Watch List 2025, stating that “More than 380m Christians suffer high levels of persecution and discrimination for their faith,” and that Nigeria continues to account for the majority of global faith-based killings. According to Open Doors’ 2024 data, 82 per cent of the 4,998 Christians killed worldwide in 2023 were Nigerian.

    Also referenced in the bill’s fact sheet are findings by Vatican News and Genocide Watch, showing that between 2009 and 2023 over 52,000 Christians—and at least 34,000 moderate Muslims—were killed in faith-based attacks led by Islamist extremists in Nigeria, while about five million people were displaced.

    It directs the US Secretary of State to designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act, impose specific sanctions, and take other related measures, citing what he described as “the world’s deadliest persecution of Christians.”

    The Republican senator for the State of Texas said he wants the bill to move forward “expeditiously” stating that “Religious persecution and violence against Christians and other religious minorities in Nigeria is endemic, driven in significant part by Islamist jihadism and institutionalized sharia law in large parts of the country.”

    The proposed legislation also targets terrorist groups and individuals implementing or supporting Islamic laws in the country.

    Under the draft law, penalties would extend to judges, magistrates, prison officials, and other judicial or law enforcement officers found complicit in terrorism, corruption, or the enforcement of blasphemy laws.

    It specifically includes anyone responsible for prosecuting, convicting, imprisoning, or otherwise depriving individuals of their liberty on charges of blasphemy.

    At a recent hearing before the US House Sub-Committee on Africa, Nigerian faith leaders and diaspora witnesses delivered written testimonies describing entire rural communities in Plateau, Benue, and Southern Kaduna states as “living under nightly siege.”

    Representatives of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and Intersociety, a civil rights group, said attacks by “non-state armed actors” are often dismissed as “banditry” but, under US law, meet the Title 22 definition of terrorism—acts of violence against non-combatants for ideological or political ends.

    Here’s a snippet of the bill:

    1. The Bill designates Nigeria a “Country of Particular Concern,” naming Boko Haram & ISIS as extremist threats.

    It targets Nigerian officials: Governors, judges, police, who enforce blasphemy laws or ignore religious violence, with sanctions.

    2. Within 90 days, and yearly, the U.S. must publish a list of those linked to religious killings since 2015.

    3. Nigeria stays on the CPC list unless blasphemy laws are repealed & extremist groups neutralised. It means 12 northern states: Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Niger, Sokoto, Zamfara and Yobe – must amend or repeal such laws or face continued designation and possible targeted sanctions.

    If enacted, Cruz’s bill would require the State Department to re-impose consequences and restrict certain defence and economic cooperation programmes with Nigeria until “credible progress” is shown in preventing anti-Christian killings.

    How a bill becomes law:

    1. Introduction in the Senate by a member

    2. Referral to a committee — in this case, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — for review, debate, and possible amendment.

    3. Full Senate vote once it clears the committee.

    4. Companion approval by the House of Representatives.

    5. Reconciliation of both versions into one final text.

    6. Submission to the President for signature or veto.

    7. If the president signs it, the measure becomes federal law. If he vetoes it, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both houses.

    There’s a high probability of passage of this bill. The Senate now counts 52 Republican seats, with the House holding a similarly conservative majority—simply put, Republicans have most seats.

  • No place for a coup in Nigeria

    No place for a coup in Nigeria

    • By Ernest Omoarelojie

    In recent weeks, Nigeria’s public discourse has been clouded by rumours of a foiled coup plot involving over a dozen military officers and a former governor allegedly “on the run.” While the Defence Headquarters has issued a characteristically ambiguous statement, the very persistence of these rumours—whether grounded in fact or fabricated through disinformation—demands urgent clarification: There is absolutely no place for military intervention in today’s Nigeria.

    This isn’t mere rhetoric. It’s a data-driven conclusion supported by Nigeria’s painful history, the catastrophic failures of recent military takeovers across Africa’s Sahel region, and mounting evidence of foreign-backed disinformation campaigns designed to destabilise democratic governance across the continent. While it is true that the statement from the DHQ neither confirmed nor denied the reports, the speculation has continued to spread rapidly across social media—fuelled by conspiracy theories, propaganda, and coordinated disinformation. Yet, amid the noise, one truth must be re-emphasised and declared without ambiguity: There is no place for a coup or military junta in today’s Nigeria.

    No grievance, however genuine, justifies a return to military rule. Nigeria’s democracy may be imperfect, but it remains the only framework capable of reforming itself without destroying the nation. We have already paid too high a price for the lessons of authoritarianism. The mere imagination of another coup is not only reckless but profoundly dangerous for a country still healing from decades of military misadventure.

    Read Also: FEC approves $396m loans for northern IDPs, Sokoto health project

    Between 1966 and 1999, Nigeria endured six successful coups and several failed attempts. The first, in January 1966, plunged the country into chaos, triggering a civil war that claimed over a million lives and left deep ethnic and regional scars that still shape our politics today. Those years of military interregnum—29 in total—brought suspended constitutions, curtailed freedoms, and economic mismanagement that impoverished generations.

    By 1998, Nigeria’s per capita income had declined by nearly 40 per cent from its 1980 levels, inflation had soared, and international sanctions had rendered the nation a pariah. Between 1960 and 1999, Nigeria earned more than $350 billion from oil exports, yet emerged with decrepit infrastructure, foreign debt exceeding $30 billion, and rampant poverty. Transparency International later estimated that at least $5 billion was stolen under one military regime alone.

    We cannot forget those years. Military rule did not save Nigeria—it nearly destroyed her.

    Since 1999, despite setbacks, democracy has delivered measurable progress. Nigeria has experienced seven consecutive elections and four peaceful transfers of power between parties—unprecedented in our history. Our economy has grown, from $46 billion in 1999 to over $440 billion today, making Nigeria one of Africa’s largest economies. Freedom of expression and civic activism have flourished. The media is freer than ever, and civil society continues to shape national debate. These gains, however modest, are the fruits of civilian rule.

    Contrast this with recent experiences in Africa’s Sahel region, where coups have been romanticised as patriotic revolutions. In Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, soldiers promised stability but delivered chaos. The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) reports that violent incidents in Mali have increased by more than 150 per cent since the 2021 coup. Burkina Faso recorded over 8,000 conflict-related deaths in 2023—its bloodiest year on record. Niger, once a model of Western partnership, now faces sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and growing insecurity.

    Far from restoring order, military juntas have exacerbated corruption, restricted freedoms, and weaponised propaganda to conceal their failures. Transparency International’s indices confirm that corruption perceptions have deteriorated across all junta-led states. Freedom House now ranks every coup-affected nation as “Not Free.” The message is unmistakable: military rule breeds repression and decline, not progress.

    Equally alarming is the rise of disinformation designed to destabilise democracies like Nigeria’s. Research by the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD) and EU DisinfoLab has uncovered coordinated online campaigns—some linked to foreign actors—spreading pro-coup sentiment across West Africa. These networks exploit legitimate frustrations over insecurity and poverty to romanticise military rule and sow distrust in civilian institutions.

    This is not patriotism; it is manipulation. Every Nigerian who forwards unverified rumours of a coup or glorifies soldiers as saviours is, knowingly or not, amplifying the work of those who wish to fracture our democracy from within.

    Let us be clear: democracy is not perfect. Citizens are frustrated by corruption, unemployment, and governance failures. However, the answer lies in deeper reform, not a return to authoritarianism. Democracy allows us to protest, vote, speak, and litigate. Military rule silences all of that. The difference between democracy and dictatorship is not perfection—it is the presence of choice.

    Even now, Nigeria’s institutions continue to evolve. The 2022 Electoral Act has improved transparency and electoral integrity. The Freedom of Information Act empowers journalists to demand accountability. The judiciary, although imperfect, is increasingly asserting its independence. These are steps forward—achievements that would vanish overnight under a military junta.

    Nigeria’s Armed Forces have repeatedly affirmed their loyalty to the Constitution. That commitment must be protected and celebrated. Civil society, the media, and citizens must also remain vigilant, resisting any attempt—real or imagined—to drag Nigeria back to the dark era of decrees and fear.

    In today’s interconnected world, a coup would not only destroy Nigeria’s fragile stability but also trigger economic collapse, diplomatic isolation, and social unrest. The Sahel’s tragedies are warning enough: the gun cannot build what only governance can.

    Nigeria’s future lies not in the barrel of a gun but in the ballot box, in civic participation, and in accountable leadership. The path of democracy is hard, but it is the only one that leads forward. For all our imperfections, democracy gives us hope, adaptability, and voice. Military rule silences all three.

    •Omoarelojie is the Director of Media and Communications for Hope Alive Initiative, a pro-good-governance advocate in Nigeria.

  • Nigeria, EU, UNICEF partner on €6.3m project to boost local health commodity production

    Nigeria, EU, UNICEF partner on €6.3m project to boost local health commodity production

    The federal government has entered into a new partnership with the European Union (EU) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to strengthen Nigeria’s capacity for local production of vaccines, medicines, and nutrition commodities.

    The two-year initiative, Enabling Local Manufacturing of Health, Immunisation and Nutrition Commodities in Nigeria (ELM-N), is part of the EU’s Global Gateway Manufacturing and Access to Vaccines, Medicines and Health Technologies (MAV+) programme, valued at €6.3 million, with the EU contributing €5.5 million and Spain providing an additional €800,000.

    The agreement, which was formalised at the Nigeria-EU Health Investment Forum in Abuja, seeks to reduce Nigeria’s reliance on imported health products by enhancing local manufacturing, improving supply-chain efficiency, strengthening regulatory systems, and fostering technology transfer and innovation.

    The Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Senator Abubakar Bagudu, described the initiative as a major step in Nigeria’s plan to build a stronger, more competitive pharmaceutical sector and attract sustainable investment.

    “This partnership demonstrates our commitment to aligning investments with clear policy priorities and measurable outcomes. 

    “It will expand opportunities for local production, facility financing, and technology transfer, positioning Nigeria as a regional hub for health innovation, research, and development,” Bagudu said.

    EU Ambassador to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Gautier Mignot, who represented Team Europe, said the Global Gateway strategy aims to transition partnerships from aid-based support to strategic, investment-driven collaboration.

    “Through MAV+, we are supporting manufacturers, governments, academic institutions, and other key stakeholders in advancing local production. 

    “This represents a shift toward peer-to-peer partnerships between Europe and West Africa,” Mignot said.

    Additionally, Spain’s Ambassador to Nigeria, Félix Costales Artieda, noted that the collaboration would not only advance local manufacturing but also enhance equitable access to essential health commodities across the ECOWAS subregion.

    “This project marks an important milestone in unlocking Nigeria’s healthcare value chain and boosting health security,” he said.

    Representing the United Nations (UN) system, UNICEF’s Representative to Nigeria, Wafaa Abdelate, who spoke on behalf of the UN Resident Coordinator, highlighted that local production remains vital to achieving universal access to life-saving health products.

    She noted that Nigeria still has more than two million zero-dose children and faces significant maternal health challenges. 

    “It is urgent that investments like this translate into timely, affordable, and safe access to vaccines, medicines, and nutrition products for all Nigerians,” Abdelate added.

    According to the project’s framework, ELM-N will focus on strengthening Nigeria’s health commodity supply chain, promoting innovation in pharmaceutical production, and supporting regulatory harmonisation.

    It will also complement ongoing national reforms aimed at revitalising the local pharmaceutical industry and align with broader EU and multilateral efforts in reproductive, maternal, and child health as well as digital health development.

    Implementation is expected to commence immediately, with stakeholders set to identify potential manufacturers, assess investment needs, and deploy technical assistance to accelerate local production and distribution of essential health commodities.

  • FULL LIST: Nigeria third-largest recipient of US foreign aid in September — Report

    FULL LIST: Nigeria third-largest recipient of US foreign aid in September — Report

    Nigeria has emerged as the third-largest recipient of US foreign aid in Sub-Saharan Africa, according to a new analysis by Cable Index.

    The report tracked disbursements across 20 African countries as of September 2025.

    The report revealed that the United States disbursed over $516.69 million in foreign aid to Nigeria during the period, placing it behind Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, which received $617.35 million and $571.35 million respectively.

    According to the index, U.S. foreign assistance remains heavily focused on humanitarian support, health programs, education, and governance initiatives aimed at promoting stability and development across the African continent.

    Other notable recipients include Zambia ($214.42 million), Senegal ($205.74 million), Burkina Faso ($202.22 million), and Mali ($183.07 million).

    Read Also: Enabulele warns against U.S. military intervention in Nigeria

    At the lower end of the list, Ghana received $114.56 million, ranking 20th among the Sub-Saharan nations.

    Here are the beneficiaries of U.S. foreign aid in September 2025:

    1. Ethiopia: $617.35m
    2. Congo: $571.35m
    3. Nigeria: $516.69m
    4. Sudan: $514.55m
    5. Kenya: $402.84m
    6. Somalia: $402.57m
    7. Mozambique: $325.41m
    8. Uganda: $324.17m
    9. South Sudan: $308.43m
    10. Tanzania: $288.80m
    11. Zambia: $214.42m
    12. Senegal: $205.74m
    13. Burkina Faso: $202.22m
    14. Mali: $183.07m
    15. Malawi: $181.98m
    16. Zimbabwe: $173.48m
    17. South Africa: $166.08m
    18. Niger: $162.08m
    19. Côte d’Ivoire: $129.59m
    20. Ghana: $114.56m

  • Enabulele warns against U.S. military intervention in Nigeria

    Enabulele warns against U.S. military intervention in Nigeria

    Dr. Bright Enabulele, a globally recognised Nigerian economic and policy analyst, has publicly broken his silence regarding controversial statements made by United States (US) President, Donald Trump concerning violence and attacks on Christian communities in Nigeria.

    Addressing journalists in Abuja, Enabulele, in a sharply worded response, firmly rejected the notion of foreign military intervention, arguing that the nation requires sustainable “solutions, not war.”

    The policy expert’s statement comes amid renewed debate over Nigeria’s internal security challenges and the appropriate role of the international community.

    Enabulele warned that any proposed military incursion by the US would have devastating long-term consequences far beyond the immediate security situation.

    “What Nigeria needs is a solution, not war,” Enabulele stated forcefully. He stressed that while security is paramount, the path to peace must be internal and diplomatic. “A military invasion, irrespective of how well-intentioned, would only serve to set the country back decades, risking regional destabilization and catastrophic humanitarian fallout.”

    Enabulele also focused heavily on the geopolitical implications for the United States, suggesting that intervention would establish a negative global standard. He concluded that authorizing such a move would “set a wrong and dangerous precedent for America’s engagement with sovereign nations across the world.”

    Highlighting the country’s stature, Enabulele reminded the global community of Nigeria’s economic significance. Nigeria is often cited as the seventh largest economy in the world, and any conflict would disrupt international markets and supply chains. He urged global leaders to shift focus from military options to empowering local governance, supporting economic development, and implementing targeted policy reforms to address the root causes of internal conflict.

    He concluded his remarks by calling for a unified, non-military strategy: “Our priority must be collaborative problem-solving, not the escalation of conflict through foreign boots on the ground. We must address the political and economic drivers of this crisis together.”

    Enabulele maintained that a balanced partnership is what the US should offer. “Nigeria seeks not foreign intervention, but a balanced partnership—one that enhances our capacity to defeat terrorism from within, preserves our sovereignty, and stabilises the wider Sahel.” 

    “Our collective immediate objective should be to strengthen Nigeria–US relations through a mutually beneficial strategic partnership that prioritizes joint intelligence, technology transfer, and capacity-building—while avoiding direct US military intervention that could undermine sovereignty or local legitimacy,” he added.

  • Nigeria: Two coups in two weeks

    Nigeria: Two coups in two weeks

    Within the past two weeks, Nigeria has experienced two serious cases of coup d’é•tat. One was domestic, and the other foreign. The domestic one was a military coup. The foreign one was a political or, more accurately, a disguised economic coup. It was alleged that the domestic coup was meant to target the President directly, but that coup was foiled. The foreign coup promises to target Islamic terrorists, and it is still brewing. Just the other day, as we were settling down to breakfast in a Phoenix suburb, someone asked me if I heard the roar of fighter jet engines in the air. “No,” I answered. “But what about fighter jets?” “They are heading to Nigeria to solve Nigeria’s problems,” the fellow answered.

    The other person in the conversation was joking about President Donald Trump’s threat to send the army to defend Christians in Nigeria, following its designation as a Country of Particular Concern in response to orchestrated allegations of “Christian genocide.” Trump’s pronouncements have generated so much debate as to have drowned the debate about the domestic coup, which came before the foreign one.

    It is a shame that there are Nigerians celebrating both coups. They may have missed these lines from someone, who put them out on social media in response to coup celebrants: “Because of the hatred of the cockroach, the mosquitoes voted for the insecticide. But when it came, it killed both the cockroach and the mosquitoes, including the flies that never voted.”

    It is even more shameful that there are Nigerians boasting of responsibility for planting the seed of alleged Christian genocide in Trump’s mind as one fellow did in a virile video in which he named some Nigerian church leaders as accomplices. But that’s not even the issue now. The critical issue of the moment is how to respond to Trump’s pronouncements. It is unwise to blame or insult Trump on this issue as some commentators have chosen to do. Trump has a clear agenda, and he has not been hiding it from anyone who cares to listen to him or watch his actions.

    Here are a few things to bear in mind. One, it is important to appreciate that Nigeria is the only one threatened with military invasion among the countries on the United States’ CPC list due to alleged violations of religious freedom. The others are: North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, and China.

    Two, it will be naive to assume that Trump, or at least the American State Department, does not know the complexities of the insecurity situation in Nigeria. It is advisable to fully understand why the alleged Christian genocide resonates with Trump. Christian conservatives and Christian evangelicals, including Nigerian-American ones, are critical to Trump’s support base. They are a major lobby group to which Trump responds. That is why the transactional use of religion is critical to his political strategy. That is why he included in his threat to Nigeria, “We stand ready, willing and able to save our Great Christian population around the world.” Besides, Trump’s MAGA agenda often trumps facts on the ground, and he has not been shy about using hard power to achieve his goal.

    Three, Trump always speaks aloud about what he wants to do. Just see what he has been doing to fellow Americans since he assumed office. He promised retribution. He is doing it, by weaponizing the justice department in the process. He promised to flush out illegal aliens (particularly Hispanics). He is doing it, even trapping in some American citizens in the process. He promised to shrink the federal government. He is doing it. He led the Republican Congress in shutting down the federal government, while he engages in his Asian tour and returns home to play gulf. What about his global outreach? He promised tariff on imports. He did it across the globe, not minding its domestic repercussions. He promised to aid Netanyahu of Israel in flushing out Hamas from Gaza. He did it. Gaza is now lying fallow. The world can only watch. He may not have succeeded all the way, such as failing to annex Canada and Grenada to the US or stopping the war in Ukraine on his first day in office. But you cannot blame him for pushing hard on his agenda.

    Read Also: Nigeria will emerge stronger amid Trump’ threats – Tinubu

    Four, it must be recalled that, in recent years, American intervention in conflicts beyond its borders has left the target countries in shambles: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan.

    Five, Nigeria has more to lose than any other country in which the United States has intervened. Apart from its position as the largest country and economy in Africa and the highest concentration of Black people on earth, Nigeria is rich in solid minerals, including petroleum, bitumen, gold, crystal quartz, tin, granite, copper, iron ore, and lithium-bearing ores. This list is the envy of the world, not least Trump’s United States. On top of this enviable list of resources, Nigeria how houses the largest in the world, Dangote Refinery, owned by a Nigerian!

    Six, everything in the preceding paragraph plus innocent people will be collateral damage, with some becoming the spoils of war, should Trump send troops to Nigeria. The world watched Gaza razed to the ground as Trump-aided Netanyahu looked to exterminate Hamas terrorists. It is, therefore, better for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu (a Muslim married to a Christian evangelical pastor) to negotiate the Nigerian situation President to President. And Trump even left room for that by inviting the Nigerian government to move fast. Tinubu started well with a measured response: “The characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant does not reflect our national reality, nor does it take into consideration the consistent and sincere efforts of the government to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs for all Nigerians.”

    This is not the time for idle talk or press statements. Nor is it time for armchair columnists to pontificate. It is also not time for opposition leaders in Nigeria to start pointing fingers. Rather, it is time for unity of purpose. It is time for statesmanship. It is time for the display of soft power through diplomatic and other back channels.