Tag: Nigeria

  • From N62b to N529b

    From N62b to N529b

    •The cost of a second runway for Abuja airport has raised the need for general policy on contract variation

    When it comes to award of projects, governments in Nigeria are quick to sign dotted lines. Contractors are willing to take on any project for which they are invited, irrespective of the requisite financial and technical competence. The contractors, including big ones, are even more willing to take on those that show all the signs that they would fail, knowing well that they could pocket the mobilisation fees that sometimes run to 30 per cent of the contract sum.

    Unfortunately, the proposed second runway for the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, appears to have been caught in this web. First brought to public glare in 2009, and awarded to Julius Berger for the sum of N62 billion, it was adjusted upwards to N64 billion the following year, with the government dumping Julius Berger for the Chinese company, CCECC.

    Today, it appears horrifying that the Chinese contractors want variation to N529 billion. Incredible! We could understand why the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Mr. Festus Keyamo, was livid while defending the 2025 budget of his ministry before the House of Representatives. He rejected the variation move and said something would be done about it.

    It is however surprising that the supervising minister for all the agencies under the aviation ministry would get involved in such drama while appearing before the legislators. Ought he not to have taken action while the budget estimates were being prepared? Was the matter ever presented before the Federal Executive Council pursuant to its insertion into the budget? If it was, who presented it? The Federal Government should come up with a general policy on contract variation. What ought to have been done in the instant case before it was finalised is just being done — invitation of experts and other stakeholders for input.

    Read Also: Valentine’s Day: Celebrate responsibly, NACA urges Nigerians

     It is difficult to understand why it has taken a whole of 16 years to romanticise the need for a second runway for the only international airport in the federal capital. Whatever anyone may say to the contrary, there is no doubt that the airport in Abuja should have another runway. Twenty-two years after it was inaugurated, why is it still on the drawing table? Many times, foreign heads of state are received, or our president is on the move and the only runway is therefore shut for a period to the discomfiture of passengers. At other times, an aircraft could break down on the runway or there could be an accident, for the period before its evacuation, there would be no movement.

    It is not to the credit of those who have been running affairs in the ministry and the appropriate agencies that nothing has been done so far. Whatever might be the impediments, provision of a second runway for the second busiest airport in the country, located at the federal capital, should be given expeditious consideration.

    Mid-last year, Mr Keyamo promised that the airport would be in place within one year, but we are still trapped on considering what the cost should be. It is worthy of note that the ministry has now invited reputable European firms to get involved in evaluating what should be the cost. It’s not only Nigeria that is building runways, even in Africa, when converted to dollars, how much does it cost in other countries? We do not expect decision on this to take so long. Within weeks, the ministry should put its house in order and revert to the National Assembly that should give the contractors a deadline.

    If the current contractors could not deliver what we want at a reasonable price, we should waste no time in getting new ones. There is no way that second runway should not be in place before the end of 2026. Relevant committees of both houses of the federal legislature have to provide the needed oversight to ensure the needful is done in this respect.

  • Nigeria, Germany  partner on unemployment

    Nigeria, Germany  partner on unemployment

    Germany’s Giessen-Friedberg Chamber of Commerce and Industry is set to collaborate with Nigeria’s Organised Private Sector (OPS) on a dual vocational training scheme aimed at reducing the country’s unemployment rate, which currently exceeds 20 per cent.

    It was during a meeting at the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) yesterday, German Chamber Chief Executive Officer Dr. Matthias Leder said Germany successfully brought its unemployment rate below five percent through its vocational training model.

    Leder expressed confidence that a similar programme could benefit Nigerian youths.

    “Vocational training has proved to be very successful in Germany from day one, and that is why we can boast of less than five percent unemployment.

    “Nigeria has a high unemployment rate, but with the suppor t and collaboration of both the public and private sectors, we can replicate this success for Nigerian youths,” he said.

    Read Also: Federal Govt targets capital market to fund infrastructure

    He explained that under the proposed initiative, Nigerian apprentices will work three days a week in a company and spend two days at a vocational training school to gain hands-on experience while receiving formal education.

    According to him, the programme is not only designed to address skill shortages in Nigeria but could also provide employment opportunities in Germany, where there is currently a manpower deficit.

    Head of Competence Center Africa at the German Chamber of Commerce Dr. Kirsten Albrecht said a structured plan has already been developed with Nigerian chambers to implement the vocational training project.

    She explained that the initiative would strengthen the partner institutions’ capacity, improve services for member companies, and foster national and international exchange.

  • Does Nigeria need more states?

    Does Nigeria need more states?

    • By Kene Obiezu

    Sir: Many Nigerians experience a sharp increase in the racing of their hearts whenever the question turns on the creation of new states. Could it really happen? Can Nigeria have more than the 36 states it has had since 1999?

    These questions have always engaged the mind of keen political observers and even the not so keen. Can names like Muri, Katagum, Okun and Apa suddenly become washed in the milk of statehood in Nigeria? It is not impossible, even if it seems more improbable by the day.

    One of the reasons it doesn’t appear like it will happen anytime soon is that almost every Nigerian seems to want a state. If the floodgates are opened, every community, no matter how remote, may just want to become a state.

    The House of Representatives suddenly stirred from its slumber to pass a motion calling for the creation of 30 new states across the country.

    State creation has always been one of the thorniest questions in Nigeria’s constitution. Indeed, the hurdles placed on the path of those who would create more states in Nigeria by the 1999 constitution make it as seemingly insurmountable task. Those who try soon abandon the Sisyphean task.

    When the drafters of the 1999 constitution sat to draw up Nigeria’s penultimate paper, it appears they deliberately decided that Nigeria would be fine with 36 states. To secure Nigeria’s 36 states, they strung into the constitution the stingiest and most stringent conditions for the creation of new states. That these strings, as fragile and legal as they are, refused to snap in the face of the cyclone of agitation for new states means that the drafters of the constitution predicted they would come and stopped them even before they came.

    Read Also: End of Fubara’s ‘rascality’ close, says Speaker Amaewhule

    For those angling for the creation of new states, the provisions of section 8, subsections 1 to 3 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) which requires a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate, the House of Representatives, State Houses of Assembly, and local governments to create a new state has remained a bridge too far.

     Does Nigeria need more states?

    The question that must however engage the minds of Nigerians as this question has come up again is whether Nigeria needs more states. In other words, is Nigeria fine with 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, or does it require more states?

    The question is not an easy one to answer, but the chaos that has unfolded in many states since 1999 makes it far from an impossible one. While the federal government and all the presidents Nigeria has had have failed to lift Nigeria to the heights it can hit, the states have not covered themselves in glory either.

    With many state governors playing god, brazenly bludgeoning through their state resources and showing laughably little regard for laws and institutions, many Nigerians have hardly felt the impact of their state governments.

    People in the rural areas have fared worse. With many state governors content to sit tight and sit in on local governments and their allocations, rural dwellers are often without basic amenities to compound the harrowing experience that is government in Nigeria.

    The solution to this kind of invasive incompetence is not the creation of more states. Far from it. Nigerians should be more invested in getting the existing states work and work well. Nigerians should channel their energies into fine-tuning the constitution to get existing state performing, instead of creating more states that will only deplete resources that should be committed to development.

    •Kene Obiezu,

    keneobiezu@gmail.com

  • Nigeria, Bahrain establish bilateral relations

    Nigeria, Bahrain establish bilateral relations

    Nigeria and Bahrain at the weekend engaged in bilateral discussions on diplomatic and direct foreign investment.

    Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Yusuf Maitama Tuggar, announced the diplomatic relations when he Manama, the Kingdom of Bahrain at the weekend

    A statement by his media aide, Alkasim Abdulkadir, said Tuggar engaged in bilateral discussions with his Bahraini counterpart, Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani.

    The ministers signed a communiqué officially announcing the establishment of diplomatic relations between both countries.

    Read Also: Venezuelan investors eye Nigerian mining sector, says Martinez

    The meeting, the statement said, “focused on strengthening diplomatic relations, facilitating foreign direct investment from Bahrain, enhancing trade and investment opportunities, and fostering cooperation in the oil and gas sectors, with particular emphasis on onshore projects and the development of the eighth train LNG”.

    It added: “The ministers also deliberated on the training of Nigerian diplomats and collaboration within multilateral fora.

  • Nigeria, Bahrain establish bilateral relations

    Nigeria, Bahrain establish bilateral relations

    Nigeria and Bahrain at the weekend engaged in bilateral discussions concerning diplomatic and Direct Foreign Investment. 

    Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Yusuf Maitama Tuggar, according to a statement by his media aide, Alkasim Abdulkadir visited Manama, the Kingdom of Bahrain.

    He said Tuggar engaged in bilateral discussions with his Bahraini counterpart, Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani. 

    The ministers, according to the statement, signed a communique officially establishing diplomatic relations between both countries. 

    The meeting the statement further noted, “focused on strengthening diplomatic relations, facilitating foreign direct investment from Bahrain, enhancing trade and investment opportunities, and fostering cooperation in the oil and gas sectors, with particular emphasis on onshore projects and the development of the 8th train LNG. 

    “The ministers also deliberated on the training of Nigerian diplomats and collaboration within multilateral forums.

    Read Also: Nigeria commiserate with Namibia over death of former President Nujoma 

    “Both ministers signed a Joint Communiqué, officially establishing diplomatic relations between the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Kingdom of Bahrain. This agreement marks a significant milestone in fostering closer ties and mutual cooperation between the two nations.

    “This development aligns with Bahrain’s ongoing efforts to strengthen international partnerships. Recently, Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani chaired the third meeting of the national committee for monitoring the implementation of the outcomes of the Bahrain Summit Initiatives, underscoring the kingdom’s commitment to global collaboration.”  

  • WFP to address hunger, malnutrition in Nigeria with $2.5b till 2027

    WFP to address hunger, malnutrition in Nigeria with $2.5b till 2027

    The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) has dedicated a total of $2.5billion to address acute hunger and malnutrition of a record 25million vulnerable Nigerians, The Nation has learnt.

    From available information, this intervention covers the 2023 to-2027 Nigeria Country Strategy Plans (CSP) geared towards achieving zero hunger and improved nutrition across the country.

    Confirming this development, Mr Seriene Loum, Head of Programme, WFP said this at the Co-creation workshop organised by the organisation in collaboration with National Social Investment Programme Agency (N-SIPA) in Abuja, recently.

    Loum, who represented WFP Country Director, said WFP’s strategic goal was to ensure a world without hunger in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (1 and 2) on poverty and zero hunger.

    He said the organisation would work closely with member states of the United Nations including Nigeria to mobilise resources to be able to fully implement the programmes.

    Read Also: Nigeria must build economy that can weather all storms – Makinde

    “WFP Nigeria CSP 2023 t0 2027 a five-year project has a dedicated activity for strengthening institutional capacities and enhanced enabling environment in line with national target to achieve zero hunger by 2030.

    “The project focuses on food technology, fortification of supply chain management, improving nutrition and emergency preparedness responses.

    “2023 to 2027 have five pillars and each of them focus on zero hunger and improved nutrition.

    “We have some interventions that focus on emergency response, making sure that people will not go to bed hungry, which are lifesaving activities that aim to provide immediate food assistance to people that are in need,” he said.

    Loum identified Nigeria as operating one of the biggest social safety nets programmes in Africa.

    He said it was also encouraging that Nigeria had an ambitious safety nets programme target at uplifting hundreds of millions of its populace out of poverty.

    He said: “considering the current economic trend and level of vulnerabilities in Nigeria the Cadre Harmonised (C result of October 2024 reveals that about 25 million Nigerians are acutely food insecure and projected to reach 33 million between June to August 2025.

    “It is therefore expedient that all stakeholders most especially, WFP need to work together with the Federal Government for this very ambitious goal to be achieved,” he said.

    Also, Prof. Badamasi Lawal Chief Executive Officer, NSIPA said the seminar was meant to harness collective expertise and resources to achieve meaningful impact in the lives of Nigerians.

    Represented by Mrs Uche Obi, Director, Human Resources Management, he commended WFP for its commitment to supporting Nigeria’s efforts to address poverty, hunger and malnutrition.

    According to her, WFP partnership is a testament to the power of international cooperation and the shared vision of creating a more equitable and prosperous society.

    “The NSIP launched in 2016, elevated to a full-fledged Agency in 2023 has made significant strides in addressing poverty, inequality, and social exclusion.

  • Time to Audit NGOs in Nigeria

    Time to Audit NGOs in Nigeria

    By Alade Fawole

    “USAID is a key component of the US government’s “regime change” operations worldwide. USAID spends billions of dollars every year propping up “NGOs” overseas that function as shadow governments, eating away at elected governments that the US interventionists want to overthrow. Behind most US foreign policy disasters overseas you will see the fingers of USAID. From Ukraine to Georgia and far beyond, USAID is meddling in the internal affairs of foreign countries…” (Ron Paul, February 4).

    Coming from a politician and former member of the United States Congress, this is certainly beyond what can be casually categorised as reckless or infantile assertion, hence it should be taken seriously by developing countries which are recipients of US and other foreign aid.

     With regards to the activities of non-governmental organizations operating in Nigeria under the cover enabled by current democratic governance, I penned a cautionary piece titled “Foreign NGOs and their Greek Gifts,” (The Nation, July 27, 2022) where I warned of the need to beware of official US aid-giving agencies, specifically USAID and its sidekicks, namely, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), International Republican Institute (IRI), and National Democratic Institute (NDI), which are deeply involved in so-called pro-democracy activities in the country but which are in reality the Trojan horses for US intelligence agencies.

    I also warned that though it might sound crazy “but it is true that these ‘democracy’-aiding agencies actually have invisible umbilical cords with the US Central Intelligence Agency that enable it to plant and embed its operatives in their overseas offices and field operations. This is neither an idle conjecture nor one of those conspiracy theories.”

    Read Also: VC to Nigerians: don’t abuse Artificial Intelligence

    But I still won’t be surprised if some dismiss my warning as unnecessarily alarmist, or at worst a ventilation of some conspiracy theory intended to malign the US and its bountiful munificence in ‘helping’ and ‘promoting’ our young democracy. I am not unmindful that several prominent Nigerians, mostly academics who have abandoned university teaching and research, are deeply involved in NGOs and that many have made highly financially rewarding careers in NGO activism in the country, sometimes unwittingly promoting a myriad of foreign-dictated agendas like human rights, democracy, women liberation and empowerment, genital mutilation, child rights, human trafficking, rape and gender-based violence, even LGBTQ+.

    To be honest, I have no objections to the issues they focus on or promote, except of course the gender-bending LGBTQ+ which offends against both my faith and culture, and against which subsists a law duly passed by the National Assembly and assented to by then President Goodluck Jonathan.

    For the sake of our country, its fledgling democracy and development, it is high time we conducted a proper comprehensive audit not just of the finances but all activities of all NGOs operating in Nigeria and receiving their funding from foreign sources, since USAID, their main benefactor is itself to be audited. I know that this call is bound to kick up a storm and pushbacks, or possibly attract flagellation for me from concerned NGO activists, but I am convinced it is even more desirable now against the backdrop of copious revelations (not mere accusations anymore) since President Donald Trump issued the Executive Order to temporarily freeze all foreign funding activities related to USAID for 90 days, and also in line with Ron Paul’s assertion referenced above.

    Shouldn’t we honestly be concerned about those local NGOs being funded by USAID? Let’s be honest with ourselves, those outside organizations providing funding for local NGOs might not necessarily be doing so from purely altruistic intents, and it has become clear that USAID in particular is not in the business of altruism. I remember a common aphorism popular among us friends back in my undergraduate days, and which is ever relevant: we have two hands, one for giving and the other for receiving. Implication: we naturally expect something in return for whatever we give! This is even much more relevant in international relations where altruism is not considered a strong virtue. Nations act in their self-interest and would naturally entertain expectations of rewards for any good they do, to receive something in return for what they give. What nations give and what they receive in return may not necessarily be equal or commensurate, but they at least receive something in return.

    In the piece referenced above, I did warn that “coups and other violent forms of regime change are integral to America’s diplomatic activities in any country where the US has a resident embassy, and where its aid-disbursing agencies have set up shop to fund the activities of local NGOs, community-based associations, civil society organizations, pro-democracy, human rights bodies and sundry ghost organizations”.

    Am I accusing our local NGOs of surreptitiously working against the interest of the nation? Certainly not! But it is important to realize that the so-called aid-giving agencies mentioned above have been severely implicated in organizing and sponsoring “colour revolutions” to topple governments in different countries across the globe. Emblematic examples: the Rose Revolution in Georgia (2003), the Orange Revolution in Ukraine (2004), the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan (2005), the Arab Spring in parts of North Africa and the Middle East (2011), the Velvet Revolution in Armenia (2018) to name a few. Instead of launching outright military operations which are often costly in terms of manpower and resources, the US, according to Global Times, “prefers to use colour revolutions as a tool to intervene in other countries internal affairs to subvert governments in order to reinforce its global control.”

    Let it be made clear to our so-called pro-democracy NGOs and activists that the United States which sponsors them is itself neither a democracy nor truly interested in democracy anywhere in the world for that matter. America’s long history and ignoble record of toppling democratically elected governments in the post-WWII era (beginning with Iran in 1953) because it covets their vast natural resources makes it a patently bad advertisement for liberal democracy, as many have begun to perceive that Washington’s insistence on democratization across the globe is nothing but a suitable mechanism for empire-building. Nigeria’s possession of vital natural resources such as hydrocarbons and others that the US covets, makes it a candidate for destabilization, regime change and intimidation to enable America maintain unimpeded access to those resources, and as to as much as practicable, deny them to geopolitical rivals such as China and Russia.

    Our hapless Democratic Republic of Congo has been a basket case and a site of murderous confrontations since the CIA intervened in its internal affairs at independence in 1960 to assassinate Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba, destabilize it, and impose three decades of Mobutu Sese Seko’s tyrannical rule, and all these because the country is rich in natural resources the US and its European allies covet. Shouldn’t the knowledge that DR Congo is nothing but a victim of its natural resources endowment serve to wake us up to the objective reality that the US is not our friend, it is actually not anyone’s friend for that matter? An in the event that we deceive ourselves, let’s remember Henry Kissinger’s pungent assertion: “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal!” A word is enough for the wise.

    •Prof Fawole writes from Ikire, Osun State.

  • Nigeria, Kuwait to sign MoUs on bilateral ties

    Nigeria, Kuwait to sign MoUs on bilateral ties

    Nigeria and Kuwait are expected to sign various agreements aimed at deepening bilateral ties between both countries.

    Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, has already landed in Kuwait on a working visit.

    The landmark visit, which runs from February, 5th to 8th, will see officials from both sides signing various agreements.

    The visit marks the first time a Nigerian Foreign Minister has visited Kuwait since the establishment of diplomatic relations 55 years ago.

    Tuggar, according to his itinerary shared by his media aide, Alkasim Abdulkadir, will engage in strategic discussions with his Kuwaiti counterpart, Ambassador Abdullah Ali Al-Yahya.

    The agreements scheduled for signing include: Joint Commission for Cooperation: Establishing a framework for stronger bilateral ties, Bilateral Consultations MoU: Strengthening diplomatic engagements between both Foreign Ministries and Diplomatic Training Cooperation MoU: Enhancing capacity building and diplomatic expertise exchange.”

    Read Also: TikTok removes over 2m videos in Nigeria over violation – Report

    Additionally, the duo are expected to discuss issues that will advance negotiations on economic, trade, investment, science and technology and agricultural cooperation agreements.

    The statement further revealed: “The visit will also include high-level meetings with His Highness Sheikh Ahmed Al-Abdullah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, the Prime Minister of Kuwait, and a courtesy call on His Highness Sheikh Mishal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Amir of Kuwait.

    “As part of the visit, Ambassador Tuggar will meet with Kuwait’s Minister of Petroleum, Tariq Suleiman Al-Roumi, and the Director-General of the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development (KFAED), Waleed Al-Bahar. The minister will also participate in a business lunch hosted by Kuwaiti authorities, attended by leading business figures and investors.

    “This visit is expected to strengthen diplomatic, economic, and investment ties between Nigeria and Kuwait, opening new avenues for cooperation across multiple sectors.”

  • Nigeria, Kuwait to sign MoUs for deeper bilateral ties

    Nigeria, Kuwait to sign MoUs for deeper bilateral ties

    Nigeria and Kuwait are expected to sign various agreements aimed at deepening bilateral ties.

    Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, has already landed in Kuwait on a working visit.

    The landmark visit, which runs from 5th to 8th February 2025, will see officials from both sides penning various agreements.

    The visit marks the first time a Foreign Minister has visited Kuwait since the establishment of diplomatic relations 55 years ago.

    Tuggar, according to itinerary shared by his media aide, Alkasim Abdulkadir, will engage in strategic discussions with his Kuwaiti counterpart, H.E. Ambassador Abdullah Ali Al-Yahya.

    They are also expected to sign key bilateral Agreements and Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) designed to deepen cooperation between both countries.

    The agreements scheduled for signing include: Joint Commission for Cooperation: Establishing a framework for stronger bilateral ties.

    • Bilateral Consultations MoU: Strengthening diplomatic engagements between both Foreign Ministries.
    • Diplomatic Training Cooperation MoU: Enhancing capacity building and diplomatic expertise exchange.”

    Additionally, the duo is expected to discuss issues that will advance negotiations on economic, trade, investment, science and technology, and agricultural cooperation agreements.

    Read Also: Nigeria open for business, says Oduwole

    The statement added: “The visit will also include high-level meetings with His Highness Sheikh Ahmed Al-Abdullah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, the Prime Minister of Kuwait, and a courtesy call on His Highness Sheikh Mishal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Amir of Kuwait.

    “As part of the visit, Ambassador Tuggar will meet with Kuwait’s Minister of Petroleum, Tariq Suleiman Al-Roumi, and the Director-General of the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development (KFAED), Waleed Al-Bahar.

    “The Minister will also participate in a business lunch hosted by Kuwaiti authorities, attended by leading business figures and investors.

    “This visit is expected to strengthen diplomatic, economic, and investment ties between Nigeria and Kuwait, opening new avenues for cooperation across multiple sectors.”

  • How bad is Nigeria?

    How bad is Nigeria?

    Two years ago, I found myself playing host to in-laws who came visiting from England with three children who had never been to Nigeria. Overfed with a diet of bad news about the country they were travelling to, they were prepared for the worst. I observed with amusement how they warily scanned their surroundings – perhaps expecting Tarzan to spring from the bushes without warning.

    I burst out laughing when one of the teenagers exclaimed: ‘Look! They even have buses,’ on sighting a Lagos BRT bus. On the drive home, they were sufficiently impressed with their environment that they confessed Nigeria wasn’t the hell on earth that they had been led to believe it was.

    For the next couple of weeks they would have the adventure of their young lives, doing simple things they couldn’t do in the concrete jungle where they lived. Things as mundane as climbing trees, chasing down lizards in the compound, visiting a local market to buy a live goat that would become a pet for them for over a week. When it was time to terminate the goat, they wept like they had lost a brother.

    These adventures included a visit to Ekiti where their granny and uncles made them learn how to pound yam – an exercise they took to with gusto. All these experiences they kept sharing on live feeds with their friends in England. They left Nigeria vowing to return very soon. Such was their enjoyment of a country many choose to dismiss.

    Denigrating the country is a pastime that has lasted for as long as it has existed as an independent country. Hyper criticism is the default mode for most Nigerians. That’s understandable because there’s so much to criticise – everything from failure of governance, lack of infrastructure, widespread poverty to extreme corruption. Whatever hopes the citizenry had about their new country in 1960, has been dashed over and again as the brief democratic experiment soon collapsed under the weight of internal contradictions – resulting in over three decades of military rule. Those who came promising to make Nigeria better often left it plumbing new depths of despair. Little wonder our favourite national sport is self pity and hate.

    While much of the criticism is deserved, a lot of it is something regurgitated by rote. A lot of Nigerians in the Diaspora are transfixed by their daily dose of bad news on social media, that they sternly warn those foolhardy enough to try, not to visit home if they loved themselves. A simple violent robbery incident or minor terror attack is blown up as though the entire country is on fire. Many are suspicious when you offer a narrative different from what they have come to believe.

    The country’s terrible image flows largely from what we say about ourselves. Over time I have come to see that foreign visitors and observers are often less harsh about the state our country than we are. When the ordinary South African citizen mock Nigeria as ‘a generator nation’, it’s down to our moaning over the years about failings in the area of electricity generation and distribution.

    When others ridicule us as scam artists and ritual killers, there is sufficient ammunition to do so, but it’s also down to sensationalism on social media and in Nollywood. The damage caused by movies that portray the country as nothing more than a haven for witchcraft and voodoo priests would take a lifetime to undo.

    Read Also: Tinubu approves N80 billion for Alau Dam reconstruction

    It is one thing when you are being hard on yourselves at home, it’s a different kettle of fish when the extreme criticism is internationalised by influential figures who, in so doing, reinforce existing negative impressions. In November 2024, afrobeats star Davido who hasn’t been shy to dip his feet into political waters ever since his uncle indicated interest in the governorship of Osun State, had on a visit to the United States warned his compatriots who had made their escape from the continent, not to make the mistake of returning because there was nothing good to report. His counsel was also directed at African-Americans who were showing increasing interest in goings-on on the continent.

    Speaking on the Big Homies House podcast, he said the Nigerian economy was in shambles and there were systemic issues affecting African countries. “It’s not cool back home,” he said.

    Not to be outdone, the new leader of the British Conservative Party, Kemi Badenoch, spent her first months in the position launching acidic attacks on her country of origin. From talking of how her brother’s shoes were allegedly pinched by the police, to bluntly warning that governments here destroy lives, she’s been a one-woman wrecking ball hammering away at the country’s already battered image.

    Many have been scratching their heads trying to make sense of her strategy given that Nigeria’s condition is unlikely to be a major concern of British voters at the next poll. Those who would have her pause in her desperate bid to be more English than King Charles, point to the fact that her predecessor as Tory Leader, Rishi Sunak, never scorned his Indian heritage the was she was done her own roots.

    There’s sufficient evidence that putting down her country of origin isn’t exactly helping her drive to become Britain’s first black female Prime Minister. A YouGov poll published late last year showed that only 32% of Tory voters felt she would be a good PM. Even more galling is that fact 24% of her party members felt that the extreme right wing politician, Nigel Farage of Reform UK, would do a better job.

    The foregoing is not to suggest that all is perfectly well with the country. Far from it! We’ve all acknowledged that we are in the midst of unprecedented economic challenges. But there’s no issue or failing in this country that’s unique to her. It is disappointing when you imagine that a country with so much potential could do a better job. Still, it isn’t sufficient reason for the amount of self hate Nigerians indulge in.

    In their push for power opposition politicians would magnify the economic challenges and claim civil liberties are under organised assault worse than in days of junta rule. Unfortunately, almost all their leading lights have been part of government at different levels in the last 30 years and had ample opportunities to make a difference. They didn’t. This makes their posturing as would-be saviours highly suspect.

    In 2022, Nigeria’s economy was ranked largest in Africa. Today, it is fourth behind the likes of Egypt, South Africa and Algeria. Despite continuing challenges there are signs of stabilisation and recovery on the back of ongoing reforms. Growth rate is expected to be between 3% and 4.17% depending on source of statistics. The African Development Bank Group projects 3.4% in 2025, while the Central Bank expects it to be as high as 4.17%.

    The government promises to drive down inflation from the current 34% to a more manageable 15%. Many analysts think this is optimistic. Still, it would welcome relief for most families who have seen their pay cheques bringing in less goods home month after month.

    The tremendous developments in the oil and gas sector, with the rise of Dangote Refinery, the resurrection of a couple of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) owned refineries and other lesser facilities, has transformed the country from a net importer of petroleum products to an exporter with potentially disruptive effect on European and other markets.

    Poverty isn’t going to disappear overnight. Boko Haram attacks in the Northeast, banditry in the Northwest or secessionist violence in the Southeast would continue to make headlines from time to time. But the charitable would acknowledge there’s a more stable situation with regard to insecurity which is far cry from the situation two or three years when mass abductions were almost a weekly occurrence.

    Nigeria may have these issues but let’s not forget that there are countries on the African continent which up till date have been carved by militias and where ethnic conflicts have raged unabated for decades. It may have her unique struggles but it doesn’t have to worry about that uniquely American phenomenon of gunmen walking into school yards and malls on mass killing sprees.

    This is a country on the mend that deserves a breather from unrelenting and unreasonable bashing.