Tag: Nigeria

  • Nigeria’s new framework to drive digital transformation, innovation

    Nigeria’s new framework to drive digital transformation, innovation

    Programme Manager of Green and Digital Economy, and European Union Delegation to Nigeria as well as ECOWAS, Frank Okafor, has affirmed said the  Participatory Policy Implementation Framework (PPIF) will enhance digital transformation and innovation.

    In a statement yesterday, Okafor said the framework will address the gap in digital policies and enhance their implementation at the state level.

    The initiative followed challenges in the practical application of policies, such as Digital Economy Strategy (2020-2030) and National Digital Innovation and Entrepreneurship Policy.

    Okafor said: “European Union’s commitment to digital transformation, rooted in our Digitalisation framework, aligns with Nigeria’s priorities for creating a digitally skilled population and robust digital infrastructure,”

    PPIF, developed by National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), with GIZ/Digital Transformation Centre (DTC) Nigeria, was handed over to Ministry of Communications, Innovation & Digital Economy in July for scaling at federal level. The framework will be piloted in states to promote its adoption and integration.

    Read Also: Tinubu hails judicial contributions to national growth, development

    Okafor noted  PPIF aims to bridge the gap between policy formulation and implementation through inclusive, transparent, and effective approach. Key to its success will be stakeholder engagement and collaborative governance, involving actors from state and non-state entities to the private sector and local communities.

    The framework employs a structured methodology that reviews frameworks and integrates international best practice. Core principles of PPIF include increased transparency and accountability, fostering trust between government institutions and citizens, and enhancing local relevance by incorporating indigenous knowledge and perspectives.

    PPIF is expected to deliver benefits, including improved policy implementation, greater local adaptability, and increased stakeholder empowerment. It will promote evidence-based decision-making and foster ownership among stakeholders, leading to better policy outcomes.

    Supported by Digital Transformation Centre Nigeria,  and funded by European Union, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the initiative is implemented by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

    It focuses on advancing digitalisation, innovation, and entrepreneurship.

  • ‘Construction professionals to leverage Nigeria’s $128 billion building sector’

    ‘Construction professionals to leverage Nigeria’s $128 billion building sector’

    …exhibition holds next month

    No fewer than 9,000 professionals and 150 exhibitors from 20 countries will tap into Nigeria’s $128 billion construction market at the country’s largest construction trade exhibition scheduled for Lagos next month.

    The event is the 4th edition of the Big 5 Construct Nigeria which will be held between September 24 and 26.

    Sponsored by CDK Industries and supported by the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), Nigerian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (NIQS), and the Project Management Institute (PMI) – Nigerian Chapter, it is an avenue for industry professionals to leverage opportunities and partnerships, showcase products & services, innovation, expertise and knowledge to the Nigerian construction industry.

    Portfolio Director – Construction, dmg events, Mehtap Gürsoy said the event is timed this year to match the surge in construction activity in the country, creating significant demand for innovative products and solutions, particularly from key buyers involved in ongoing and upcoming projects in Nigeria’s $128 billion construction market.

    Professionals will engage in 25 CPD-certified Big 5 Talks under the themes of architecture & design, facilities management, project management, quantity surveyors, technology, and sustainability.

    More than 30 speakers will provide valuable insights on the sector’s opportunities and challenges, with some of the key topics of discussion being project financing and the importance of cost management, stakeholder communication and collaboration, the positive impact of BIM implementation, and tech trends in Nigerian construction, among others.

    Read Also: List of governors who pledged to implement N70,000 minimum wage

    Prominent industry figures to speak at Big 5 Talks are Ibikunle Dashur, President & CEO at Construct Mache Group; Gerald Madondo, Country Director – Nigeria at Turner & Townsend; and Eniafe Enianu Emmanuel, Builder & Project Manager at Encon Sharon Engineering Services.

    This year, the exhibitors’ list has grown with new exhibitors across the full construction value chain including building interiors and finishes; building materials; concrete and cement; construction tools and personal protection equipment (PPE); digital construction and intelligent buildings; heavy construction; HVAC-R; mechanical, electrical and plumbing services (MEP); solar, and urban design and landscapes.

    The organisers noted that first-time exhibitors include Bosch, Swiss Krono, Schneider Electric, Rowad National Plastic, Decho, Amaltech, Hira Industries, Peri Formwork, Kuo Fire Safety, Emirates Fire Fighting Equipment (Firex), VGS Solar and more.

    The Big 5 Construct Nigeria will host four country pavilions that will demonstrate unique construction solutions from Austria, China, Egypt, and Türkiye. Other participating countries include India, UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Switzerland, Belgium, Poland, Ghana, USA, Ivory Coast, Pakistan, Tunisia and Nigeria.

    Registration is now open with free admission to trade and industry professionals over the age of 18.

  • Because we happened to Nigeria…

    Because we happened to Nigeria…

    Nigerians are a curious breed. Think of us as the proverbial coastal dwellers dying of thirst. We lament our parched tongues. But we defecate in our fresh springs and struggle to slake our thirst with poisonous waters from distant lands.

    Beyond metaphor, Nigeria teeters on the brink of cognitive dissonance, the mental racket that fuels our habit to curse our fate after we self-destruct.

    This dissonance seeps into the wellsprings of our civilization—corrupting culture, family, and our social institutions. The manifold failures that beset our country, from the bungled economy to our subversive partisanship; to our lack of universal and quality health care; to protracted terrorism and the neocolonialist grip on our politics and media, can all be traced back to the very institutions that mould and sustain our citizenry and political elite.

    In this fractured landscape, the need to rescue Nigeria from destructive mentality is not just urgent but existential. Amid the chaos, some Nigerians endeavour to challenge the status quo or at least sound the alarm over a glaring social ill. Consider the sad case of a certain Simon Oladapo, who witnessed the final moments of a very dear one at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH). The latter was taken to LUTH on an afternoon, only to be told that no beds were available—a familiar refrain in a country where scarcity often cloaks corruption.

    Yet, hope flickered when a bed was suddenly offered for a price: N100,000 naira. The sum was paid, and a space was secured. Oxygen, the breath of life, was the next demand, and again, money exchanged hands. Then came the tests, a race against time that ended abruptly within three hours of admission, as the patient’s life ebbed away. Yet at the latter’s death, the real ordeal had only just begun.

    The hospital, a place of healing, became a labyrinth of toxic bureaucracy. The release of the body was contingent upon the mortuary staff, who refused to act without a Coroner’s report. The Coroner, however, was conspicuously absent, a ghost in the machinery of death. Meanwhile, the hospital staff insisted on an autopsy before issuing a death certificate, despite the family’s refusal. The autopsy, they were told, would cost another N200,000 naira.

    Hours passed in anguish before the Coroner appeared, signing the necessary documents. An ambulance, hired to transport the body to Ibadan, waited in the oppressive silence. The mortuary staff, elusive for over an hour, eventually materialised, moving the corpse to the morgue where a fresh demand for an autopsy was made—despite the family’s protests.

    The morgue was then locked, its gate shut against the grieving family. The ambulance, hired in haste, stood idle as the night closed in, the family left stranded and broken by a system that seemed to care more for today and tomorrow’s fees than for the dignity of the dead.

    In the face of such cruelty, Oladapo lamented, “No honour for the dead. No feelings for the bereaved. I understand that the management of LUTH may not be aware that their staff are doing this. Some of those demons probably went to Mosque today to pray for a better Nigeria. Some of them will probably be in Church on Sunday to pray for Nigeria. As long as you have demons running around government institutions like this, no matter how fervently people pray for Nigeria, it will remain an irredeemable country.”

    The story resonates the pitiable fate of Dele Agekameh, an accomplished journalist whose life expired at the gates of the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) in 2019. Agekameh was a victim of apathy and dereliction of duty from those who swore an oath to save lives. Nurses, who should have been the hands of mercy, turned away, leaving a dying man in his car – until he was pronounced dead.

    Did the walls of LASUTH reach out and deny him care? No, it was the men and women within. They are the embodiment of the everyday Nigerian—entrusted with position, power or privilege, only to wield it as a sword against the weak.

    Every Nigerian, in their silent complicity or active participation, chisel away at the foundations of the country, and then turn to curse the ruins they created. It is a twisted dance of self-sabotage, where the blame is artfully shifted to an abstract entity—Nigeria—an entity as lifeless as the earth and as pure as the gold lying dormant beneath it. But it is not Nigeria that fails her people; it is the people who fail Nigeria.

    This grotesque spectacle repeats in the fate of several deceased and bereaved Nigerians, who are forced to navigate a maze of extortion and inefficiency, as hospital staff bicker over bribes and paperwork while precious lives ebb away.

    What does this say about us? That in our quest for self-enrichment, even the sanctity of life is a commodity to be bartered? Such mean-spiritedness belongs primarily to the predator while it hunts its prey. Several civil servants and public officers become the architects of a dystopia where justice is bought, where healthcare is denied to the sick, and progress is sabotaged.

    Read Also: National single window project kicks off in Nigeria

    Yet, amid the grand chorus of finger-pointing, how many Nigerians pause to consider their own roles? It is easy to lament that “Nigeria happened” when faced with hardship, to cry that this vast land is cursed. But Nigeria is no more than soil and stone, rivers and mountains; it is Nigerians who manifest on Nigeria, like a curse.

    We see it in every corner of society. The Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) and National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL), for instance, plunge the nation into darkness and a vortex of fuel scarcity, not out of some malevolent force of nature, but through the hands of saboteurs within their ranks.

    The hypocrisy is staggering as the same civil servant who extorts and afflicts the public will bemoan leadership corruption and the state of the nation.

    Consider too, the sad irony of the 2020 #EndSARS movement, a powerful uprising against police brutality that ended in bitter public squabbles over the embezzlement of donor funds. How telling, that even in the midst of a righteous cause, the beast within us reared its head. We saw how swiftly the noble became the ignoble, how quickly the movement for justice was tainted by the same greed it sought to eradicate.

    This is not Nigeria’s fault. It is the fault of Nigerians, who pervert the promise of this great land. Until we confront this truth, we will continue to stumble in darkness, blaming the shadows for the sins we commit in daylight.

    We have weaponised our social systems, perverted our institutions, and in doing so, we have crafted a narrative of national failure. We are the saboteurs, the fraudsters, the corrupt officials, the indifferent citizens who look the other way. We are the ones who have taken a country rich in potential and turned it into a cautionary tale.

    But all is not lost. The first step towards redemption is recognition. We must see Nigeria for what it truly is—not a malevolent force, but a victim of our collective failings. And in that recognition, there is hope. Hope that we can change, that we can stop this self-inflicted tragedy and begin to build the Nigeria we dream of—a land where the soil is rich not only in resources but in the promise of a better future. Nigerians are a curious breed. Think of us as the proverbial coastal dwellers dying of thirst. We lament our parched tongues. But we defecate in our fresh springs and struggle to slake our thirst with poisonous waters from distant lands.

    Beyond metaphor, Nigeria teeters on the brink of cognitive dissonance, the mental racket that fuels our habit to curse our fate after we self-destruct.

    This dissonance seeps into the wellsprings of our civilization—corrupting culture, family, and our social institutions. The manifold failures that beset our country, from the bungled economy to our subversive partisanship; to our lack of universal and quality health care; to protracted terrorism and the neocolonialist grip on our politics and media, can all be traced back to the very institutions that mould and sustain our citizenry and political elite.

    In this fractured landscape, the need to rescue Nigeria from destructive mentality is not just urgent but existential. Amid the chaos, some Nigerians endeavour to challenge the status quo or at least sound the alarm over a glaring social ill. Consider the sad case of a certain Simon Oladapo, who witnessed the final moments of a very dear one at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH). The latter was taken to LUTH on an afternoon, only to be told that no beds were available—a familiar refrain in a country where scarcity often cloaks corruption.

    Yet, hope flickered when a bed was suddenly offered for a price: N100,000 naira. The sum was paid, and a space was secured. Oxygen, the breath of life, was the next demand, and again, money exchanged hands. Then came the tests, a race against time that ended abruptly within three hours of admission, as the patient’s life ebbed away. Yet at the latter’s death, the real ordeal had only just begun.

    The hospital, a place of healing, became a labyrinth of toxic bureaucracy. The release of the body was contingent upon the mortuary staff, who refused to act without a Coroner’s report. The Coroner, however, was conspicuously absent, a ghost in the machinery of death. Meanwhile, the hospital staff insisted on an autopsy before issuing a death certificate, despite the family’s refusal. The autopsy, they were told, would cost another N200,000 naira.

    Hours passed in anguish before the Coroner appeared, signing the necessary documents. An ambulance, hired to transport the body to Ibadan, waited in the oppressive silence. The mortuary staff, elusive for over an hour, eventually materialised, moving the corpse to the morgue where a fresh demand for an autopsy was made—despite the family’s protests.

    The morgue was then locked, its gate shut against the grieving family. The ambulance, hired in haste, stood idle as the night closed in, the family left stranded and broken by a system that seemed to care more for today and tomorrow’s fees than for the dignity of the dead.

    In the face of such cruelty, Oladapo lamented, “No honour for the dead. No feelings for the bereaved. I understand that the management of LUTH may not be aware that their staff are doing this. Some of those demons probably went to Mosque today to pray for a better Nigeria. Some of them will probably be in Church on Sunday to pray for Nigeria. As long as you have demons running around government institutions like this, no matter how fervently people pray for Nigeria, it will remain an irredeemable country.”

    The story resonates the pitiable fate of Dele Agekameh, an accomplished journalist whose life expired at the gates of the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) in 2019. Agekameh was a victim of apathy and dereliction of duty from those who swore an oath to save lives. Nurses, who should have been the hands of mercy, turned away, leaving a dying man in his car – until he was pronounced dead.

    Did the walls of LASUTH reach out and deny him care? No, it was the men and women within. They are the embodiment of the everyday Nigerian—entrusted with position, power or privilege, only to wield it as a sword against the weak.

    Every Nigerian, in their silent complicity or active participation, chisel away at the foundations of the country, and then turn to curse the ruins they created. It is a twisted dance of self-sabotage, where the blame is artfully shifted to an abstract entity—Nigeria—an entity as lifeless as the earth and as pure as the gold lying dormant beneath it. But it is not Nigeria that fails her people; it is the people who fail Nigeria.

    This grotesque spectacle repeats in the fate of several deceased and bereaved Nigerians, who are forced to navigate a maze of extortion and inefficiency, as hospital staff bicker over bribes and paperwork while precious lives ebb away.

    What does this say about us? That in our quest for self-enrichment, even the sanctity of life is a commodity to be bartered? Such mean-spiritedness belongs primarily to the predator while it hunts its prey. Several civil servants and public officers become the architects of a dystopia where justice is bought, where healthcare is denied to the sick, and progress is sabotaged.

    Yet, amid the grand chorus of finger-pointing, how many Nigerians pause to consider their own roles? It is easy to lament that “Nigeria happened” when faced with hardship, to cry that this vast land is cursed. But Nigeria is no more than soil and stone, rivers and mountains; it is Nigerians who manifest on Nigeria, like a curse.

    We see it in every corner of society. The Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) and National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL), for instance, plunge the nation into darkness and a vortex of fuel scarcity, not out of some malevolent force of nature, but through the hands of saboteurs within their ranks.

    The hypocrisy is staggering as the same civil servant who extorts and afflicts the public will bemoan leadership corruption and the state of the nation.

    Consider too, the sad irony of the 2020 #EndSARS movement, a powerful uprising against police brutality that ended in bitter public squabbles over the embezzlement of donor funds. How telling, that even in the midst of a righteous cause, the beast within us reared its head. We saw how swiftly the noble became the ignoble, how quickly the movement for justice was tainted by the same greed it sought to eradicate.

    This is not Nigeria’s fault. It is the fault of Nigerians, who pervert the promise of this great land. Until we confront this truth, we will continue to stumble in darkness, blaming the shadows for the sins we commit in daylight.

    We have weaponised our social systems, perverted our institutions, and in doing so, we have crafted a narrative of national failure. We are the saboteurs, the fraudsters, the corrupt officials, the indifferent citizens who look the other way. We are the ones who have taken a country rich in potential and turned it into a cautionary tale.

    But all is not lost. The first step towards redemption is recognition. We must see Nigeria for what it truly is—not a malevolent force, but a victim of our collective failings. And in that recognition, there is hope. Hope that we can change, that we can stop this self-inflicted tragedy and begin to build the Nigeria we dream of—a land where the soil is rich not only in resources but in the promise of a better future.

  • Some impediments to effective governance in Nigeria

    Some impediments to effective governance in Nigeria

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of Nigeria and President Joe Biden of the United States share one feature in common: No matter what economic policies they have proposed to improve their citizens’ lives, the citizens do not appreciate them. This is partly because in both countries, inflation and the cost of living are high and partly because the governments have done a poor job of communicating the advantages of their policies to the public. While both Presidents are concerned about long-term economic stability, the citizens are concerned about today, about what it costs them now to eat, sleep under a shelter, and move from one place to another. It is no wonder then that, in both countries, the opposition readily weeps up the people’s emotions by weaponizing the economic situation for political gain.

    The economic situation in Nigeria is bad alright, but what makes the present situation worse is a range of factors, notably, various groups aiding an abetting government failure in their retaliation against President Tinubu’s policies; corruption; the high cost of governance; weak institutions; weak center of government; and lack of evidence of consistent performance evaluation. I review these factors below, but none exhaustively.

    In Tinubu’s adversaries and the planned protests (The Nation, July 31, 2024), I highlighted the various groups possibly behind the 10-day protests against Tinubu’s governments, despite repeated entreaties to shelve the protests to avoid the kind of violence that took over the #EndSARS protests in 2020. True, the protests did take place over ten days, the government’s fears were realized as the protests were accompanied by violence in the northern parts of the country. This is understandable, because the North has the highest levels of illiteracy, poverty, insecurity, youth population bulge, and youth unemployment. These factors provide ready recruits to violent causes for cash or possible loot.

    It is no longer news that corruption and high cost of governance have been the bane of development in Nigeria. Bribery, aptly highlighted yesterday by The Nation Editorial, titled Checking bribery, is central to the corruption saga in Nigeria. Bribery and corruption cover a very wide spectrum in the country. They take place at service points, checkpoints, and police stations. Kickbacks from contracts are rampant, and cash is exchanged for position. Moreover, there is outright embezzlement, where government funds are diverted to personal projects or funneled to personal accounts, often using surrogates. These are long-standing entrenched practices throughout the country.

    The high cost of governance is a recurring decimal in government failure in Nigeria. Imagine the cost of maintaining 10 presidential jets, three of which were seized recently on court orders in France amid a long-standing dispute between ZhongshanFucheng Industrial Investment, a Chinese company, and Ogun state government in southwestern Nigeria over the development of free trade zone for the state. They were said to be in France for “routine maintenance”. True, President Tinubu has been cutting down on the cost of governance, but much more remains to be done, including selling off older presidential jets in view of the recent purchase of a new jet. In a sense, the new jet is a metaphor for negative public perception and trust deficit in government. Only a few would understand that the jet was purchased much below cost, to save maintenance costs, and for safety reasons. However, until many of the older jets are sold off, the touted cost-cutting advantage of a new jet will be lost on the skeptical public.

    To complicate matters for the government and its economic policies, the major institutions are weak, especially those responsible for implementing government policies. For example, the Nigerian civil service at federal and state levels is quite weak and prone to corruption. What is worse, Nigerian civil servants interact with those making enquiries or needing some assistance with some kind of mentality that they have to beg, bribe, or otherwise suffer some indignity before they are attended to. Many civil servants seem not to understand their role in servicing civil society, which already prepaid their salaries with their own taxes. This mentality can only be changed with periodic capacity building workshops and training for civil servants, a number of whom were recruited with little or no training in civil service tasks.

    Read Also: IGP’s dedication to justice, security commendable – Tinubu

    Perhaps one of the weaknesses of the present government is the perceived weak Center of Government. This is the organ or institution in the executive branch that provides direct support to the chief executive in managing the government, by preparing Cabinet meetings, coordinating the formulation of government policies, and working with the appropriate department charged with performance evaluation to ensure effective implementation of government policies. Ideally, this organ performs cross-ministerial functions and ties loose ends, by making sure that ministries and agencies do not act or speak at cross-purposes. At the end of the day, nothing should happen in government that misses the attention of the Center of Government. In the Nigerian case, the Center of Government should include the Vice President, the Chief of Staff to the President, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Head of Central Result Delivery Unit, relevant Civil Servants, and whoever the President wants to participate. True, Hadiza Bala-Usman, Head of the Delivery Unit, has indicated at various times that performance evaluation is on track, the results are not reflected in public perception of the performance of many ministries, departments, and agencies.

    Beyond these factors, however, the President remains confronted with responding to the demands of the protesters and to the demands for reorganizing the country for administrative and governance effectiveness. This government cannot afford another large-scale protest, nor can haphazard governance continue this way, especially at the state level. Although it will take time to work through the responses before necessary implementation, there should be no further delay before mid-term tenure.

    The country has reached a point at which a powerful centre has become undesirable, especially a centre that is larger than the total sum of its federating units. This is why citizens look up to the federal government for everything, including directing protests at it. The state Governors do the same, but without doing the needful with the resources allocated to them by the federal government. Things cannot continue this way.

  • EXPLAINER: Facts about Nigeria’s seized presidential jets, Ogun Govt and Zhongshan

    EXPLAINER: Facts about Nigeria’s seized presidential jets, Ogun Govt and Zhongshan

    The Ogun state government and Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Company Limited have been locked in a long-drawn battle over the management of an export processing zone in the South-west state.

    Zhongshan had got a judgment from the court, which led to the seizure of three presidential jets– a Dassault Falcon 7X, a Boeing 737, and an Airbus 330.

    In 2007, the Ogun State Government entered into a joint venture agreement with Zhongshan and another company to create the Ogun Guangdong Free Trade Zone Company.

    But in the first half of 2016, the agreement between the parties broke down, leading to Zhongshan filing lawsuits in Nigerian federal and state courts to seek reinstatement of its contractual rights, which failed.

    However, after taking the case before the French court, the company was awarded damages. The court prohibited Nigeria from moving or selling three presidential jets until the Chinese firm was paid the $74.5m awarded by the court.

    Zhongfu then launched an investment treaty arbitration against Nigeria, citing the bilateral investment treaty between the People’s Republic of China and Nigeria.

    On 26 March 2021, an arbitral tribunal issued a final award of $55,675,000 in addition to an interest of $9.4 million and costs of £2,864,445 payable by Nigeria to Zhongshan.

    Here’s a timeline of the events from the investment deal to the legal battles:

    2001: China and Nigeria signed a bilateral investment treaty to encourage investment between the two countries.

    2010: Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment, through its parent company Zhuhai Zhongfu Industrial Group, acquired rights to develop the Ogun Guangdong Free Trade Zone (OGFTZ) in Ogun State, Nigeria.

    2011: Zhongshan set up a local entity, Zhongfu International Investment (NIG) FZE, to manage the development of the free trade zone. The Chinese firm then carried out several works, including the development of infrastructure such as roads, sewerage, and power networks, within the zone.

    Read Also: Ohanaeze commends Obasanjo, Sanwo-Olu for condemning Igbo-must-go hashtag

    2012: Ogun State appointed Zhongfu as the interim manager of the OGFTZ.

    2013: A joint venture agreement was signed, making Zhongfu the permanent manager of the OGFTZ and giving it a majority shareholding in the project.

    2016: Ogun State abruptly terminated Zhongfu’s appointment and took action to expel the company from Nigeria, including harassment of its executives and revocation of immigration papers.

    2017: Zhongshan initiated arbitration proceedings against Nigeria, claiming a breach of the bilateral investment treaty.

    2021: On 26 March 2021, the tribunal, chaired by Lord Neuberger, the former president of the UK Supreme Court, ruled that Nigeria breached its obligations under the China-Nigeria BIT and issued a final award of $55,675,000 in addition to an interest of $9.4 million and costs of £2,864,445 payable by Nigeria to Zhongshan. The total amount is about $70 million. All efforts by the federal government to amicably resolve the dispute between Ogun State and the Chinese firm were fruitless.

    2023: Nigeria sought state immunity in a legal case but was denied by the High Court in the UK, which ruled that the country had exceeded the time limit for appealing arbitral awards.

    Two former governors of Ogun State, Ibikunle Amosun and Gbenga Daniel, vowed to support the Federal Government’s efforts to recover the national assets seized by the French court.

    Amosun, in a statement he signed, said Nigeria should not give Zhongfu (also called Zhongshan) any listening ear, as doing so would amount to encouraging “an unlawful entity without locus standi to appropriate our common patrimony.”

    Also, the Senator representing Ogun East Senatorial District promised to help President Bola Tinubu find “a diplomatic resolution to the national embarrassment.”

    Sen. Daniel described the legal conundrum as a sensitive matter involving collective national assets and commonwealth which every Nigerian should be concerned about.

    Meanwhile, the Federal Government has warned the 36 state governments against entering foreign or international negotiations without the input of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  • Nigeria’s forgotten poor!

    Nigeria’s forgotten poor!

    Have heard you loud and clear. I understand the pain and frustration that drive these protests, and I want to assure you that our government is committed to listening and addressing the concerns of our citizens”.

    These were the words of President Bola Tinubu in a broadcast to the nation on the now-suspended #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests. Among other things, the protests have highlighted the plight of Nigeria’s forgotten poor, who are not just passive bystanders but active voices demanding change. The brief nature of this outcry finds its flow in the poor’s ability to sustain their demands and hold their leaders accountable. Therefore, as the protests subside, it is crucial for the governments at the national and subnational levels to acknowledge the poor’s legitimate grievances and engage in constructive dialogue to address the systemic issues perpetuating poverty and inequality in the land.

    It is interesting to note that Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation, has long struggled with the principalities of inequality and powers of political disenfranchisement. Amidst the chaos of decades of mismanagement, corruption and neglect, Nigeria’s poor have been denied the opportunity to participate fully in the political process, to shape the decisions that affect their lives. They have been denied access to basic services and infrastructure, thus leaving them vulnerable to a cycle of disempowerment and social injustice. The sickening reality is that our economy has been stifled by a system that spends more time managing bureaucratic red tape and political conflicts. Of course, that’s why politicians are always competing to see who can promise the most bread and circuses to the poor, because, clearly, that’s all the poor needs! Tragically so, the country as a whole country has suffered as a result!

    The carnage in Bangladesh today, which has led to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s resignation and flight from the country, highlights a deeper issue. Paradoxically, in terms of the conventional definition, by growth rate, Bangladesh “is doing well”. Unfortunately, the episode in Bangladesh has once again brought up the illusion of the ‘trickle-down effect’ which, decades ago, particularly, in the 1960s, was referred to as ‘growth without development’. In view of the defining events in Kenya and Bangladesh, even in a different context in the UK and France, perhaps, in discussing the poor, we might care to contrast ephemeral growth of trickle-down economics with the concept of ‘pre-distribution’, an approach which prioritizes building from the base, ensuring access to education, healthcare, and other essential services. With all the events unfolding around us, we in Nigeria should take this with more than a passing glance.

    Read Also: US backs Nigeria on Sun Africa’s utility scale solar power project

    With the advent of self-rule in the early 1950s, pre-distribution actually became the conventional wisdom. The thrust of political thinking was to build up from the base in terms of access to sustainable development and equitable growth; and it worked! A critical look at the building of social capital by agencies such as the Lagos Executive Development Board (LEDB), and the various agencies of the regional governments attested to this. Indeed, their mode of operations led to the emergence of what used to be described as a thriving petite and real middle class. Evidence of their achievements can still be seen in areas like Surulere, which was originally ‘New Lagos’, Bodija in Ibadan, and a host of other places in and around the regional capitals of that era.

    The on-going social crises worldwide have debunked the Bretton Woods’ Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) anchored on its flawed ‘trickle-down effects’ ideology. So, it’s time to revisit ‘pre-distribution’ by recognizing the state’s crucial role in citizens’ lives. Pre-distribution requires state involvement in capital and market structures, redirecting capital to the real sectors for sustainable growth. This, in turn, generates tax revenues for the state. For instance, a universal health insurance system, funded by, say, 40 million Nigerians, each contributing a modest amount (e.g., N3,000/month) in health insurance premiums, could create a massive economy comparable to that of Togo, which is a sovereign state. The possibilities are vast, with numerous examples, such as recapitalizing the Bank of Agriculture (BOA) and linking it with Commodity Exchanges, Boards and Agriculture Cooperatives. This framework may trigger an agro-industrial revolution, boosting non-oil exports to half of crude oil exports by 2031; and that’s a conservative estimate.

    Pre-distribution is the key alternative for countries like Nigeria. So, dear fatherland must choose between pursuing the discredited Bretton Woods-inspired illusion or reverting to the more enlightened approaches of the 1950s and 1960s. The motto of the London School of Economics (LSE), ‘rerum cognoscere causas’, is instructive! By ‘knowing the causes of things’, the government can avoid social upheavals and implement a comprehensive anti-poverty programme that not only alleviates suffering but also empowers the masses, serving as a catalyst for economic growth. A notable example is President Ignacio Lula Da Silva’s poverty reduction initiatives, which sparked Brazil’s rise to a top ten global economy.

    The World Bank predicts that approximately 40.7% of Nigeria’s population will be living below the international poverty line by the end of 2024. So, the government must recognize the poor’s inherent dignity and worth. In a world that seems to have forgotten its meaning, Tinubu’s efforts have so far demonstrated a commitment to the well-being of Nigerians. His initiatives, aimed at economic growth, job creation and social welfare have been driving the steam of promise, and his willingness to engage with diverse stakeholders is a good cup towards inclusive governance. Building on this momentum, the president can solidify his legacy by taking bold steps to empower the poor and the marginalized.

    In a country that’s full of possibilities and questions, Tinubu’s administration must seize the opportunity presented by the protests to recalibrate its priorities and create a new life for the poor, free from the complications of their existence. Rather than dismissing the protests as a mere nuisance, it can empower this obviously marginalized group to drive positive change. The protests have ignited a spark, and it is now up to the government to fan the flames of reform by creating a brighter future for all Nigerians, especially the poor, who have been left in a desolate place where hope seems as elusive as freedom. The poor shouldn’t be the objects of our charity but the subjects of our own moral reckoning. Only by confronting this truth can the hymn of humanity resonate, echoing through the chambers of our collective conscience.

    Walt Whitman was right: “A promise is a cloud. It rains nourishment.” The president’s recent statement echoes this sentiment, as he cautioned against allowing “violence and destruction” to “tear our nation apart”. Instead, he urged Nigerians to “work together to build a brighter future, where every Nigerian can live with dignity and prosperity”. Commendable! But will the government, which has historically regarded the poor with suspicion and disdain, rise to the challenge and show compassion, or will it let the embers of connection to fade, once again leaving the poor forgotten? Only time will tell!

    May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!

  • Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea sign pacts on petroleum, security

    Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea sign pacts on petroleum, security

    Nigeria and Equatorial Guinea have signed pacts on a number of areas, including  petroleum and  security.  

    The agreements were reached shortly before a dinner organised in President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s honour by   host President Teodoro   Mbasogo in Malabo yesterday.

    During the dinner, President  Tinubu  emphasised the importance of peace and unity in  catalysing Africa’s development . 

    He stated that “the time is now” for the continent   to be in  charge of solving its  problems.

    Read Also: Vandals of Renewed Hope: Ruling class, journalists as saboteurs

    The Nigerian leader highlighted the  brain drain and talent loss Africa faces due to poverty, archaic judicial systems and tribalism. He advised that  these issues must be addressed to foster development.

    President Tinubu also appealed to international organisations to invest more in African research and development.

    He said: “We have to work together to make peace the focus of our development in order to really develop. Without peace you cannot develop.

    “Our problem is not that we don’t know what to do, we identify them, we understand what to do, our problem is how and when we should do them and I say the time is now.

    “We better roll our sleeves, put on our nickers and move for peace, stability and progress

    “Why are we complaining about healthcare problem if our doctors cannot have a home in their continent, if our nurses are faced with destitution, if our judicial system is archaic, if tribe is the hero in the middle of nothing?”

    “Tribalism has no place in Africa, we have to take the continent and take it strongly and… it together, help one another, develop our resources for our progress, find solutions among ourselves, dwell on research and develolement, reward those research and development programmes, bring out the results, don’t sell it out.

    “To the international organizations, we say thank you, we are partners, we’ll continue to partner, but put more than half of the results of research and development here in the continent, we have a lot of youths to cater for, millions of them yearning for progress.”

    The President also stressed the need for collective action to address conflicts in regions such as the Congo Republic and the Sahel.

    He said;”Our gathering here today(yesterday) is a significant milestone in the history of Africa and particularly West Africa, between Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Republic of Equatorial Guinea.

    “I am very happy to have listened to the very deep thinking coming from my brother, the President of Equatorial Guinea on Africa.

    “Yes, it is Africa that must solve its own problems. They want Africa wretched and raggedy, full of conflicts, antagonism of one another, but we’re saying no. Peace, stability and democracy are the way forward for a progressive development and we agreed on that.

    “We definitely will continue to promote peace and stability throughout the continent.’’

  • On Nigeria’s dismal outing at the 2024 Paris Olympics

    On Nigeria’s dismal outing at the 2024 Paris Olympics

    • By Akintayo Balogun

    The memories of the 1996 Atlanta Olympics and the success Nigeria recorded at the tournament made the Olympics very dear to our hearts. That year, Nigeria won its first-ever Olympic gold medal through Chioma Ajunwa in the long jump . Nigeria went further to win gold in football in the Kanu Nwankwo-led under 23 Dream Team. That group of players turned out to be the most historic, successful, and memorable football team ever in the history of Nigeria.  That team would have won more tournaments as a group during their heydays; save for the political barricades that stopped Nigeria’s participation in African FIFA tournaments between 1996 and 1999.

    Since 1996, Nigeria has been hoping to achieve that kind of feat and to put Nigeria on the Olympic map; unfortunately, we are yet to come close. 

    Nigeria had some very embarrassing moments in this latest Olympics that calls for serious investigations, return to the drawing board, cautions and even auditing of the participation in the games. Nigeria budgeted and used a whooping sum of N12 billion for the games. You wonder why so much money has to go into it and painfully nothing much came out of it.

    It was reported that Nigeria went to Paris with 88 athletes, allegedly with 84 officials, yet nothing to show for it. We had an athlete who was to participate in a cycling competition and had no bicycle to compete with. She had to borrow a bike from her German counterpart. The information was unfortunately well publicized on social media. Another athlete cried out that her name was not entered for a particular event. These and many more were the embarrassing situations that greeted the 2024 Paris Olympic Games.  

    Another hurtful part of the games was seeing athletes of Nigerian descent winning medals for the countries they represented at the tournament. One commentators said that Nigerians won medals but Nigeria did not. Among them was the case of Annette Echikunwoke, who was set to represent Nigeria at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics but was ruled ineligible after the Athletics Federation of Nigeria failed to register her for the required test. She switched allegiance to the United States and won a silver medal in the hammer throw, the first American woman to win a medal in the sport. Onitsha-born Ebelechukwu Agbapuonwu, now known and identified as Salwa Eid Naser, represented Bahrain and won silver in the 400m women’s event at the Olympics. Germany-born Yemisi Ogunleye’s case is understandable as she was born and bred in Germany. She won gold for Germany in shotput. Melvin Imoudu won an Olympic medal for Germany in the 100m breaststroke. Samuel Omorodion played for Spain as a striker. He was part of the Spanish team that won the gold medal in the men’s football tournament. He sure would not regret his decision to play for Spain.

    Read Also: Military requires 200 million ammunition yearly, says Matawalle

    These are the few who mounted the medal podium, not to mention the several others who represented other countries and did not make it to the podium.

    One of the things I noticed about many of the countries that participated in the games, particularly China, USA, Japan, etc, is that their have been groomed over the years. They started young. This is one major area where Nigeria is lost. We practically have zero grassroots development mechanism to grow our athletes from as young as primary schools. Looking back at the entire performance of Nigeria, both at the qualifying stage and at the tournament proper, the problem did not start in Paris. Nigeria did not participate in some of the games that it had been popular for. The Nigeria Dream Team did not qualify for the football tournament which is the game in which Nigeria has enjoyed fair success. Over the years, Nigeria has won gold, silver, and bronze in football at different Olympic tournaments. However and unfortunately, we painfully could not qualify for the game.

    When you look at the team of Bonfree Jo that won the gold in the 1996 Atlanta Games, they were mostly home-grown boys trained by Coach Clement Westerof. The Dream Team that won silver in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games that narrowly lost to a Lionel Messi-led team under-23 team had been groomed by Coach Samson Siasia from their under 20 days. That same team had been the runner-up at the Under 20 World Cup in 2006. That part of growing and grooming is unfortunately now missing in the football community. There is zero continuity in footballing, it’s now a new coach, a new set of boys, a new administration, a new system, and of course new politicians who are not vast in sports. These have not helped our football. The female football team unfortunately could not go beyond the group stage. This has been the case in as many Olympics that Nigeria has participated in.

    Nigeria has over the years been limited in participation at the Olympics. Out of the 32 different games in several categories running into nearly 100 categories done in the 2024 Olympics, Nigeria’s participation was grossly limited. What stopped Nigeria from participating in other sports like weight lifting, shooting, horse riding (Equestrian), a popular game in northern Nigeria, and any other games that we see on the streets of Nigeria?

     If Nigeria could budget as much as N12 billion for the games, then she could have participated in at least 30 different games and the different series that took place in the Olympics.

    The 2024 Paris Olympic Games turned out to be a disaster as rightly stated by the Minister of Sports and a waste of funds and as a matter of fact, the worst in the history of Nigeria. In fact, there cannot be a performance worse than going to the Olympics and coming back empty-handed. Nigeria needs to go back to its drawing table. We are obviously the giant of Africa in size and population and nothing more. It is time to look beyond track events, football, boxing, and table tennis. It is time to widen our scope and develop our potential beyond these regular sports. Nigerians are usually very good at their endeavours. The testimonies are evident. It is only opportunities that Nigerians need.  Let our leaders take corruption out of sports and stop using it as another avenue to siphon funds. Some athletes with African heritage opted to represent Western countries because their home countries demanded bribes to get them on the list. This has bedeviled African sport and not just Nigeria. Imagine the current French national team representing a country in Africa. Africa would probably have had its first World Cup by now.

    We can only hope we get it right in Nigeria and Africa at large. Our potential in sports far outweighs other countries if we can only do the right thing with the plenty of resources we have at our disposal.

    •Balogun Esq. is a legal practitioner based in Abuja.

  • Nigeria and the China-Africa September summit

    Nigeria and the China-Africa September summit

    • By Charles Onunaiju

    Barring any unforeseen circumstances, Nigeria’s president, Ahmed Bola Tinubu would pay his first official visit to China to participate in the summit of the heads of state and government of the 54 member states plus China, of the Forum on China Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) slated to hold in Beijing from September 4 – 6.

    The summit themed “Joining hands to advance Modernization and build a high-level China-Africa Community with a Shared Future” would have leaders of African member states, representatives of relevant African regional and other organizations, and also international organizations, in attendance.

    About three weeks ago, China’s Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, Chen Xiaodong visited Nigeria and delivered an invitation to President Tinubu and told the Nigerian leader that “he is an important leader and strategist in Africa”, and further added that his visit to China and “meeting with President Xi Jinping will open up more discussions and opportunities for Nigeria’s and Africa”.

    President Tinubu in receiving the Chinese Vice Foreign Minister and his delegation said that he “commend what President Xi Jinping is doing in Africa; helping with capital mobilization for projects that positively impacts the lives and livelihoods of our people in Africa.” He also noted that “the infrastructure need of Africa is monumental, particularly that of Nigeria”. President Tinubu who accepted the invitation to visit China expressed his hope that such a visit would strengthen the existing bilateral cooperation between the two countries.

    The 9th Ministerial Conference of the Forum on China Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) is elevated to a summit of the Heads of States and government and it will be the fourth of such summits since the founding of the Forum in 2000. The first summit was held in Beijing in 2006, the second held in Johannesburg, South Africa, in 2015, was followed by another summit in Beijing in 2018. The fourth summit, which is the ninth round of the triennial conference of China and Africa, will hold in Beijing in September.

    Read Also: LASG warns against attack on passengers, BRT buses

     As a veritable mechanism for Africa and China engagement, the FOCAC process has been credited with both being a platform for dialogue and consultation and more importantly, enabling practical and tangible outcomes that have generated concrete inputs to the national aggregates of participating African countries.

    From infrastructure constructions, trade, investments to vigorous cultural and educational exchanges which have considerably up-scaled capacity building and skill acquisition in Africa, the FOCAC process has responded to the existential needs in the region and helped in no small measure to ameliorate the historical infrastructure and connectivity deficits. The second and third summits which were held in both Africa and China, since the assumption of office by President Xi Jinping, were particular game-changers in the China-Africa cooperation mechanism. The two summits with combined funding support of $120 billion outlined critical and targeted areas of cooperation, including infrastructure construction, industrialization, agricultural modernization, healthcare, capacity building and personnel training, cultural and educational exchanges, which have  contributed immensely to the recovery of economies in Africa with practical outcomes in job opportunities, expanding intra-Africa trade, while also promoting the prospects of Africa regional trading mechanism, the African Continental Free Trade Area, AFCFTA.

    Already, Nigeria-China cooperation is a vital driver of the overall framework of China-Africa engagement and the summit in which Nigeria would participate will reposition and reinvigorate the pivotal position of Nigeria in the evolving trajectories of her bilateral relation with China, whom it shares the same national day.

    As the visiting Chinese Vice Foreign Minister noted, Nigeria bilateral meeting which is expected at the side lines of the summit will unlock fresh opportunities. While Nigeria, under President Tinubu is implementing tough economic reforms, mere words and statements of solidarity as have been pouring from the West is not enough.

    From Beijing, Nigeria would most certainly obtain practical inputs, especially with more investments, trade, infrastructure upgrades and most needed practical inputs that would not only cushion the current difficulties of the reform, but also add enabling critical support variables that makes tough economic reform, a worth-while endeavour both in short and long term. More importantly, China has a world-wide reputation of implementing the most successful economic reforms, with returns of not only ending absolute poverty among her 1.4 billion people but becoming the second largest economy in the world and the destination of choice for global investors. While copying mechanically China or any other country for that matter will offer nothing to Nigeria, it is however instructive that diligent study of the trajectories of China’s bold economic reforms will contribute meaningfully to align the long term goal of economic recovery, sustainability and improvement in the living standard of Nigerians.

    Nigeria and China have come a long way in cooperation and collaboration but the current historical inflection point, in which China would have to strengthen the flank of its South-South cooperation as a bulwark to the menacing and aggressive West’s containment strategy and Nigeria’s daunting challenge of reforms and recovery, means both sides must deliberately calibrate cooperation to exceed the normal routine exchanges, despite how robust and mutual they have always been.

    The challenge of the increasing global landscape fraught with uncertainties means that traditional partners such as Nigeria and China would have to be deliberately creative, to not only sustain the momentum of their relations but to inject the kind of imaginative dynamism that turns the existing opportunities into concrete and tangible outcomes while creating more opportunities and translating them to public goods. Nigeria will have to rise beyond the summit and conference glitz and glamour and set out the roadmap for practical follow-ups of summit outcomes.

    The Nigeria condition is too dire for her leaders and officials to be contented with the photo-ops, handshakes and such other glitz of summitries.

    One of the tales of China’s contemporary rise is diligent and methodical follow-ups to all the crucial blue-prints of her plans, whether conference outcomes, policy outlines, mutual agreements and other instruments or plans laid out in pursuit of the improvement in the quality of life of the Chinese people. Solemn fidelity, diligence and commitments to plans and implementations are some of the renowned attributes of contemporary China and in some ways, the generalized factors of how nations rise and develop. Nigeria is traditionally challenged on practical follow ups of conference and summit outcomes, but this time, she has no option than to rise to the challenge and accumulate as much inputs as she can, to translate to domestic economic and social fortunes.

    The Beijing summit will in its tradition, attempt to answer very innovatively the questions of the time and calibrate to meet the contemporary challenges of the participating partners and contribute meaningfully to their respective national aggregates. It will both reaffirm traditional friendship between China and Africa and also guarantee their collective trajectories to building China-Africa community of shared future.

    The gains of the FOCAC process which has been enriched with the solid outcomes of Belt and Road framework of international cooperation, will reaffirm China and Africa as the most formidable pole of peace, stability and mutual respect in the evolving multilateral and law-governed international order, despite the existential vicissitudes of the Western practice of power politics and bloc confrontations.

    •Onunaiju is research director of Abuja–based think tank.

  • Social and political rebellion in Nigeria and UK

    Social and political rebellion in Nigeria and UK

    Almost around the same time at the end of July till August 10, there were demonstrations going on contemporaneously in Nigeria and the UK particularly in England and Northern Ireland but not in Wales and Scotland. The demonstrations against tough economic situations in Nigeria were concentrated in the northern parts of Nigeria while there were scattered eruptions in the south. This is because the poverty in Northern Nigeria is more severe than in the south not because the present government wanted or caused it but because of historic reasons of aversion to western education and resultant opportunities and consequent greater impact of unemployment and poverty.

    In the UK, the protests were concentrated in more economically deprived and depressed areas like Liverpool and the Midlands while the urban areas like Manchester, Birmingham and London were spared. The protests in England began after the killing of three young white children in a school by a deranged 17-year old boy whose parents came from Rwanda. News went round that he was a Muslim boy presumably from Pakistan or an Islamic country. This was the signal for general uprising in several pockets of land in England and Northern Ireland with the rising war cry of “Pakistan go home” directed at the large Asian communities in the Midland and South East England. Happily the urban centres were spared. The people doing this were mostly the small shop keepers, rural poor and the unemployed who have been left behind by the fiscal measures of 15 years of conservative governments. They found the immigrants as scapegoats because they are visible minorities and as targets, they were easily identifiable and were physically attacked.

    Hotels harbouring asylum seekers were targeted and some were burnt. Their places of worship like mosques were torched. Once mobs became mobilized against foreigners, everyone was vulnerable including students from foreign countries. The new prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer who had had prosecutorial background took on those after the immigrants. He empowered the police and the courts to do their jobs and put rioters and vandals behind bars. The rioting went much longer than anybody would have expected but gradually the work of the police and the courts worked and the attacks on the immigrants began to simmer down.

    The reason for this social and political revolt was due mostly to misinformation spread by people using the internet to peddle rumours about the coming of Islam to their homesteads. This led the prime minister to say that proper legislations will come before parliament on how to control incendiary propaganda using the internet. Secondly the new Labour government has promised to put measures in place that would take care of social and economic deprivation that had festered during the years of Tory rule. Finally, the new government is ready to tighten the screw on the loophole on immigration to ensure that immigrants do not constitute a nuisance to society. 

    Read Also: Wike threatens to revoke land titles over non-payment of C-of-O Fees

    To rub it in, Senator JD Vance, the vice presidential running mate to Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate recently on a visit to England disparaged the government’s efforts on immigration by saying Britain is going to be the “first  Islamic  country with nuclear bombs”, forgetting that Pakistan already has the bomb. His comments were not helpful because it casts Britain as a helpless country overrun by Muslim fanatics. This is of course far from the truth but this is the kind of statement that people like Nigel Farage and his UK Reform Party would twist and run with, thus firing up anti-immigrant hatred. This has had direct impact on immigrants coming to the UK particularly students in large numbers from India and China and some from the Middle East and Africa with consequent reduction in resources available to British universities which benefit from international fees paid by foreign students.

    Many doctors, nurses and other workers in the care sector of the National Health Service are staying away from the UK which people see as an unfriendly place prone to violence. The riots have therefore damaged British reputation at home and abroad and destroyed Anglophile sentiments among students who are future leaders of countries which found British education useful.

    The demonstration in Nigeria was against grinding poverty, insensitivity of the politicians who, while calling on the people to tighten their belts because of the serious economic problems facing the country, are not ready to make any financial sacrifices. They give themselves humongous salaries and allowances and financial perks that make them look as if they were in a different country. Many of them have conditions of appointment that make the mouth water.

    Knowledgeable people of course know the country is almost bankrupt but the lavish consumption by the political elite make them bitter opponents of government policies to the extent of wanting to want to bring the edifice down on their heads. Unfortunately, many of the demonstrators have been edged on by failed politicians who might have been cheated and manipulated out of the greasy financial benefits of political and public appointments. The rest of the crowd of protesters were disillusioned patriots, regional and religious bigots who seemed to feel they and nobody else must be at the helm of government. These people were those who were shouting in Sokoto at the palace of the Sultan calling on the military to seize power as if the military has a magic wand to solve the serious economic problems facing and destroying Nigeria.

    One of the things I do not understand was the fact that even before the commencement of the protests, the government showed defeatist and helpless posture which was unlike what happened in England. It is after the whole thing died down that we are beginning to hear in muffled voices about investigation of the rioting that accompanied what was said to be a peaceful protest.  The waving of Russian flags calling on Russia to take over their country was most concerning. It is however remarkable that throughout the protest, the army was not deployed in large numbers on the streets except as means of deterrence in one or two places. Casualties were also kept low and it seems food prices are beginning to come down not necessarily because of government measures but because harvests are gradually coming to the markets to drive down the cost of food. Throughout the period of demonstrations, very little was said about the role of subnational governments of the state in tackling some of the problems facing the ordinary Nigerian. What we kept hearing is what the president has done or not done as if there are not 36 state governors in the country.

    As far as I know, Nigeria remains a federation of coequal governments each with its own area of jurisdiction and economic status and responsibility. This has led to the subnational governments having a free for all kind of corruption and squandermania with little or no control or oversight by the puny state legislatures that are mere structures rather than serious organs of government.

    The emphasis this government is placing on local government administration (LGAs) will even compound the problem with replication of what is going on at state levels at the local government level. If this happens, perhaps the next protest will not be national but state and local in concentration.

    I have heard all kinds of panaceas being suggested by armchair economists who say instead of grandiose capital projects like Lagos-Calabar express road and Badagry-Sokoto express road, government should concentrate on feeding the people. The question one would ask is after eating what next? Has it occurred to people saying this that the projects would employ hundreds of thousands of people and would open up the country for development and production thus leading to an increase in national wealth? It is not the duty of government to feed the citizens; rather what government should do is to provide security and inputs for agricultural production and transportation facilities to move goods around. Our governments in the last decade have not been able to do this and the government can be charged with dereliction of its duties and responsibility. This is a legitimate charge and government should work hard to fulfil its duty to the people. It is very unpopular to say that we need to be patient and allow government policies to work towards their end goals. Of course, government must not expect the people to wait for ever.

    The demonstrations in England and Nigeria at the same time have clearly shown how interconnected the global economy is. The people in England are protesting against higher costs of food and accommodation and are pointing wrongly to immigrants as the people causing the problem. Generally in Nigeria, the people are pointing accusing fingers to the government and people in power while forgetting their roles in bringing their country down. We are all guilty in differentiated degrees whether in England or Nigeria. The solutions to our problems must be well thought out and application of the preferred solution must be gradual and not abrupt. Calling for revolution is cheap and unintelligent and some lawyers and members of the intelligentsia playing revolutionaries may find out that revolutions tend to consume their own children.