Tag: nightmare

  • Travellers’ nightmare called Abuja- Lokoja Expressway

    Travellers’ nightmare called Abuja- Lokoja Expressway

    Seven years after the contract for the dualisation of the Abuja-Lokoja road was awarded and N116 billion expended, not much work has been done, writes SEUN AKIOYE.  

    In her capacity as the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has given Nigerians a shock of their lives a couple of times this year. From proclaiming that Nigeria was broke and might default in its regular financial obligations to confiding in the House of Representatives  Joint Committee on Appropriation/Finance on July 16, that Nigeria is losing 400,000 barrels of crude oil daily, Nigerians have had to sit on the edge anytime the minister makes a pronouncement.
    But the pronouncement, which emanated from her office in the first week of November, jolted Nigerians in a not too accustomed way. The Ministry of Finance announced the release of N160billion for Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDA) to execute capital projects in the fourth quarter of 2013. That was not the first time the ministry would release mind blowing sums for capital expenditure. Previous allocations in the year are:  First Quarter: N400 billion; second quarter: N200billion; third quarter: N250billion. The cumulative sum released by the ministry for capital projects this year amounted to N1.01trillion.
    The Federal Ministry of Works under Mike Onolememen got a large percentage of the money with a mandate to fix federal roads, which have become death traps. One of such death traps is the Abuja-Abaji-Lokoja road, which was awarded in 2006 but has grossly remained a sore and embarrassing specimen to the Federal Government. The ministry, which launched what it termed “Operation Safe Passage” in 2011, said it was determined to “reclaim the National Road Network from the state of disrepair and elevate it to an enviable state where it could once again help to promote economic growth and national integration”.

    History of a failing project

    To fulfill its promise to dualise all the roads leading to the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), the Federal Government, in 2006, awarded the notorious Abuja-Lokoja road to four major contractors. The contractors are: Dantata & Sawoe; Reynolds Construction Company Ltd (RCC); Bulletine Construction Company and Gitto Construzioni.  Prior to the award of the contract, the road has assumed notoriety for preventable carnage which often resulted in loss of lives.
    The contract was for the construction of an additional 2-lane carriageway and rehabilitation of the existing carriageway. In some sections, the contractors were to construct a number of bridges and bypass. The total sum for the completion of the project was N42billion and completion date set at 30 months, which was to terminate in 2009 but Nigerians never got to see the project come to fruition because in 2010, five years after the contracts were awarded, only about 30 percent of the job was delivered. Travelling on the road became a nightmare and the attendant hardship, loss of valuable time and the frequent carnage became the sorts of legends.
    The Ministry of Works said the non- delivery of the project was due to the inadequate funding from the Federal Government.
    “In five financial years (2006 – 2010), the total budgetary provisions for the Abuja-Abaji-Lokoja road project was N26.63 billion, representing 62.6 per cent of the total contract sum
    of N42.55 billion. While the project was starved of funds, the basic costs of construction materials such as cement, steel, bitumen, diesel, and cost of labour skyrocketed, owing to inflation. Consequently, the unit rates of the contracts became obsolete,” a senior official of the ministry said.
    By 2010, some of the section, which had been completed, began to deteriorate with potholes appearing in several sections while other sections caved in totally. By the end of 2010, work literarily stopped on the project with over N20billion naira already expended on the roads gone down the drain.
    It was, therefore, a relief to many Nigerians when in 2011, the Ministry of Works announced that work would resume on the road with a review of the scope of the work. This brought joy to the stakeholders, but the joy was short-lived when the contract was reviewed to N116 billion, representing upward review of the contract sum to about 175 percent increase of the initial sum.
    One of the Nigerians, who were shocked by the development, was Senator Abdul Ningi, the Chairman, Senate Ad hoc Committee on the Subsidy Re-investments and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P).
    Ningi said his committee “discovered” that N178 billion has been expended from the SURE-P funds on four roads and two bridges between 2012 and 2013. Ningi also “discovered” that the Lokoja -Abaji road awarded for N42billion has suddenly been increased to N116 billion by the Ministry of Works.
    Ningi’s worries were, however, not over. He questioned the wisdom of the ministry in increasing the contract sum and was concerned about the high cost of road construction in Nigeria compared to other African countries.
    The House of Representatives was more willing to give the ministry a chance. In an interview with The Nation, the Chairman House Committee on Works, Ogbuefi Ozomgbachi said while several factors could be responsible for the upward review of the project, the House would do everything possible to ensure the increase is justified.
    “The Ministry of Works has come out to explain the funding pattern that in 2006, there was zero budgeted allowance and if we look at it, you find between 2006 and 2010, the cumulative release was about N20billion in five years, and only 50 percent of the whole contract sum was released in five years. Once there is no adequate budgetary provision and insignificant release, it also affects implementation and delivery.
    “Our committee will look at the review again; we will subject it to critical compliance test and ensure that the money is justified. We have to track that to ensure that the increase is justified, that is our responsibility and we will not let Nigerians down,” Ozomgbachi said.
    But senior officials of the ministry want Nigerians to give Onolememen a pat on the back for a job well done. According to an official, after the initial project failed, the ministry constituted a Technical Committee in November 2010, which recommended the expanded scope of work and also a review of the contract sum to cater for the expanded scope. The report of the committee was then forwarded to the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) and the report and recommendations were approved by the Federal Executive Council (FEC) on September 28, and November 23, 2011.
    Since the review of the contract, the funding for the project has been taken over by SURE-P. According to officials of the Ministry of Works, the ministry handed off the funding of the project immediately SURE-P stepped in.
    “We don’t fund the Abuja-Lokoja road. We have given that to the SURE-P people, we don’t even have a budget for it. And the contractors get their money directly from SURE-P; it does not pass through us; so, you hardly can accuse us of corruption. We supervise and ensure the work is done,” an official, who pleaded not to be named because he was not authorised to speak on the matter, told The Nation.
    “The Minister has been a blessing to this country; we have not seen the kind of improvements in this ministry and with the work being done on our roads. This is the first minister that is giving us the Road Board and the Road Fund because others know such bodies will erode their authority. Onolememen has done a lot in the best interest of this country and that shows in the Abuja Lokoja road,” another official, Chude Agbakoba, an engineer, who is the Deputy Director in the Highway Department said.

    A highway investigation

    It was 5pm on December 20 in the Ministry of Works Abuja. Ejike Mgbemena, the Director Highway (North Central) was busy planning activities for a road inspection which was due the following morning. Two of his aides sat in front of him.
    Mgbemena, who joined the ministry in 1981, is by no means a novice when it comes to road constructions in Nigeria having worked in all parts of the country over a period of two decades. Mgbemena often referred to himself as “Truly Nigerian.” The Abuja-Lokoja road project is directly under his supervision and the success or failure of it fails directly on his desk.
    “The Abuja-Lokoja road is a blessing; that was the road nobody gave us any chance on but I can assure you it is almost a miracle if you look at the level of work already done. We don’t have contractors on that road again, we call them partners. Even when we owe them, we still put a lot of pressure on them to work and they have been doing just that,” Mgbemena said.
    The road contract was divided into four sections to be handled by different contractors. Section one, from Zuba to Sheda was awarded to Datata & Sawoe, a Nigerian owned construction company established in 1976. The company claims to have constructed “hundreds of kilometres of highways and township roads in Nigeria” and has over 4,000 Nigerians in its employment. In 2006, the contract sum was N11, 227,571,390.41 but which was revised to N28, 666,721,831.64 in 2011. The total length is 43 kilometres.
    The second section was awarded to RCC, a company founded in 1969. RCC is a subsidiary of SBI International Holdings with headquarters in Switzerland. Under a former company named Nigersol Construction, it constructed the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.  Aside many other juicy contracts from the government, RCC is also building the N5billion Loko-Oweto Bridge. RCC got the initial contract for Abuja/Lokoja road in 2006 for the construction of the 54.70km road from Sheda to Abaji junction for N9, 627,615,469.47 but was augmented to N31, 236,905,170.83.
    The third section was awarded to Bulletine Construction Company; it runs from Abaji to Koton-Karfe and it is 49km in length.  Bulletine, like other companies, have been involved in big government contracts but was famous after the Air force Junction Bridge it built in Port Harcourt in 2005, which collapsed in 2012. The reviewed contract for Bulletine is now N27, 720,210,133.90.
    The final section, which runs from Koton-Karfe to Abajana junction spanning 50.1 km, was awarded to another government favourite, Gitti Construzioni for N33, 093,934,061.26. Gitto, which was established in 2002, already made itself famous for controversies. After the construction of the second Niger Bridge was awarded to it, the company “donated” a 2,500 seat church to President Goodluck Jonathan in his Otuoke village.
    Investigations by The Nation on the level of work already done revealed a mix bag of optimism and concern.  In Section 1, representatives of the contractor claimed that 56 per cent of the work has been achieved. While another carriage way has been constructed within the stipulated time, the median and rehabilitation of the existing carriageway are yet to be done. However, the work already accomplished by the contractor has recorded a relief for motorists at Gwagalada.  According to some motorists, the dualisation of the road has actually eased the flow of traffic around the junction especially during festive periods.
    “By this time last year, you could spend three hours to get out of Gwagalada, but the dualisation has reduced the traffic here, this year the traffic just disappeared,” Tola Adebola, who drives an interstate bus, told The Nation in Gwagalada.
    Section 11 of the road belonging to RCC has also achieved 87 per cent completion according to officials. But full dualisation has not been achieved and the diversion at Abaji has proved a tough nut to crack for RCC. According to the company, the impediment in Abaji is the compensation to be paid for those whose properties were affected. This situation has also affected the traffic coming into Abaji. After three days of monitoring, The Nation observed that motorists require a minimum of two hours to escape the traffic snare in Abaji.  The traffic snare is permanent and gruesome, stretching for about 10km and forcing many drivers to make a diversion into the bush. Those who dared the ‘devil’s bush’ quickly got stuck in the sand and mud while on the expressway, articulated vehicles broke down, adding to the misery of commuters. A resident of Abaji said the town usually offers special prayers because of the unusual traffic gridlock.
    Only skeletal patches were done on the existing carriageway, leaving many parts of the road bumpy and unsuitable. But, according to one of the officials, the company is committed to its March 2014 completion date.
    Bulletine also claims to have completed 40 of 49km of its road. Until recently, the company has been embroiled in serious crisis forcing it to abandon the work half way. According to sources, some of the funds of the company were mismanaged, which occasioned a break in the road project. But the company has also had to deal with several knotty issues, especially of re-alignment due to the presence of Nigeria National Petroleum Company (NNPC) pipelines and burial grounds which the residents insisted must not be destroyed. The major challenge for Bulletine seemed to be the Ozi town diversion to Koton Karfe, which has remained an eye sore. Also in Gaba, work has not commenced at all and the median done between Orehi and Gaba were not the required standards.
    In Uwa, stones were used to demarcate the road while dualisation has just started in Sensentini and Ozi. The result of this delay is that many motorists have had fatal collisions and damages have been done to cars plying the road. According to some residents of Ozi, work has progressed on a “slow and painful manner”.
    Gitto construction, which promised to also deliver its 50.1km of road next year, perhaps had the most challenging terrain in the project. The company had to construct seven bridges, the biggest which would be at Karara village, but only two have been constructed. There is also a hill of 1.4km in Ohono village. From independent inspection of the length of the road and the work already done by The Nation, it is doubtful if the contractor can deliver the work in 12 months.

     The Noah’s Ark

    Mgbemena arrived in Banda village a few kilometres from Lokoja in high spirits; his guarded tour of the Abuja/Lokoja road has gone according to plan. In Abaji, where the traffic was unforgiving, he opened the half completed carriage way to allow traffic flow from both ends without obstructing each other. That eased the traffic but only for a while. Banda village, however, is where his heart is. He calls it “Noah’s Ark.”
    The devastating flood of 2012 wrecked Banda and cut off the road from Abuja to Lokoja causing untold mayhem. President Goodluck Jonathan promised that a total shut down of a major carriage way would not happen again; subsequently a new road construction was awarded. The new road, which is three meters above the flood level, is Mgbemena’s ark.
    “Gentlemen, we have achieved the full dualisation of the Abuja/Lokoja expressway, this is what I called Noah’s Ark, and I assure you that no level of flooding can ever again stop the flow of traffic again because this road is three kilometres above the flood level. This is a promise well kept,” he said.
    The Director also said a new state-of-the-art road information system would soon be installed on the Lokoja Abaji road. The system, which is expected to be delivered by the end of February 2014, will have all information on road traffic, including weather. It will also be solar powered. He also hinted that sections 1 &2 of the entire road would be completed by March while sections3&4 would be delivered in June 2014.
    While Mgbemena spoke excitedly about his Noah’s Ark, Atuqua Mohammed sat on a mat surrounded by several of his children and relatives. Along with other families, they had built makeshift huts on the other side of the Niger having been displaced by the flood.  He was not impressed by the talk of high roads and dualisation; he was worried about his lost farm and livelihood. “I just want the government to help us; we are suffering since the flood destroyed our home, help us tell them to help us,” he pleaded.
    With the work already done on the road, a new kind of problem has begun and this is over speeding by motorists.  According to Moses Audu, Unit Commander of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), Abaji, one of the major problems, especially in the completed sections of the road is over speeding.
    He said: “We had two lone accidents today which were caused by driver’s recklessness. That is why we are always on the road to keep the traffic moving and also prevent drivers from reckless driving.”
    But Mgbemena sees this as a good problem. “The roads are so good drivers no longer drive on the road, they fly. But that is a good problem. We are in touch with the FRSC to ensure maximum compliance with laid down rules,” he said.

     Stalled fund, stalled progress

    By the third week in December, almost all the contractors have closed for the year, with some of them promising to resume in 2014. Except for a handful of officials from Bulletine and Gitto, ongoing work has been brought to a halt. Some officials attributed this to the Christmas holiday but investigations by The Nation revealed it might not be unconnected with the stoppage of funds from the Ministry and SURE-P office.
    According to a cross section of aides independently interviewed, the contractors are still being owed billions of naira, a situation which may have called for their almost non-committal attitude to the project. It was gathered that one of the contractors, who is being owed about N4billion, may not complete the job unless full payment is made.
    “There are specific instructions given to the contractors which are measurable and commensurate to the funds released, but the problem is if the contractor is able to do a certain percentage that many people can see, the smaller issues of rehabilitation, median or drainages may be abandoned if the money is not sufficient,” a source confided.
    But unlike past projects, the Abuja –Lokoja road project seems to be generating keen interests from critical stakeholders in the country, Onolememen and his principal aides know this. And while the various regulators queue up to ensure probity and transparency in the execution, the most critical sector remains the watching eyes of Nigerians, especially those who ply that road regularly. This fact is not lost on the Minister.

  • Nightmare over 2013 budget

    The implementation of the 2013 budget is being threatened by lack of funds. Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN examines the shortfall in government’s revenue earning and its implications for governance.

     

    The implementation of the 2013 budget has sparked off a fresh row. The Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) led by Governor Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers State has demanded for the resignation of the Minister of Finance and Co-ordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, for non-compliance with the revenue projections of the Federal Government’s 2013 budget.

    It is not surprising that this year’s budget is not being implemented as stipulated in the Appropriation Act. It was a product of conflicts between the executive and the legislators. The estimates were inflated by the lawmakers without taking into consideration the government’s revenue status. After the presentation of the budget by the President to the National Assembly in October 2012, a logjam was created by the lawmakers. The increased the oil benchmark from the proposed $75 per barrel to $79; reduced the recurrent expenditure and increased the capital vote; inserted some constituency projects that were not included in the financial estimates proposed by the executive and increased the overall budget by about N63 billion.

    When the budget was passed on December 20, 2012, many were excited that, for the first time in many decades, there was a chance of the 2013 budget being implemented from January 1. That hope was short-lived because the National Assembly did not send the budget to the President for his assent until January 14. It marked the beginning of the waiting game.

    The President took exceptions to the changes in the estimate by the lawmakers. He withheld his assent to the Appropriation Bill. Following public outcry over the delay in signing the budget, the President reluctantly signed the budget on February 26. According to experts, the President signed it for two reasons. The first was that he didn’t want to leave the budget unsigned till March. Also, he wanted to pre-empt the National Assembly from overriding his presidential veto after 30 days.

    In April, the President returned the budget to the National Assembly with a bill seeking to amend it. Initially, the law makers rejected the proposal because the amendment sought by the executive requested them to rework the budget. It took almost four months before the National Assembly could conclude deliberations on the bill. The country wasted eight months on budget deliberation, leaving virtually four months for implementation.

     

    Shortfall in revenue

    earning

     

    During preparation of the 2013 budget, the Federal Government had targeted an estimated N712.92 billion quarterly. However, data from the Budget Office of the Federation (BOF) indicated that, in the first quarter of 2013, the actual gross non-oil revenue of N448.68 billion was received. This signifies a shortfall of N264.24 billion or 37.06 per cent below the quarterly estimate of N712.92 billion.

    The 2013 Budget Implementation Report (BIR) released recently by the BoF indicated that the Federal Government also contended with revenue shortfall in the oil and gas sector, despite the favourable oil prices at the international market.

    According to the report, the actual net oil revenue that accrued to the Federation Account in the first quarter was N967.84 billion, indicating a shortfall of N245.96 billion or 20.26 per cent below the projected quarterly estimate of N1.213 trillion.

    The report noted that, in spite of the favourable oil prices at the international market, the lower- than- projected performance of the net oil revenue in the first quarter of 2013, was due to the fall in oil lifting figures during the period.

    The decrease in oil liftingwas attributed to the incessant crude oil theft, bunkering, pipeline vandalisation, which had been on the increase in recent times in the Niger Delta region.

    Dr Okonjo-Iweala attributed the slow pace of budget implementation to the shortfall in the revenue earnings.

    Renowned economist Henry Boyo disagreed. According to him, the earnings from internally and externally generated revenue sources are more than enough to implement the budget. He said the Federal Internal Revenue Service has generated over N4 trillion this year. Besides, earnings from oil export are higher than what was projected in the budget. The oil benchmark in the budget is $75 per barrel, whereas the type of crude that Nigeria produces has been selling for over $100 per barrel at the international market in the past one year. So, the price of crude oil is over 33 per cent of the benchmark, he explained.

    Boyo said, that “given that the total budget of 2013 is about N5 trillion, I don’t think we should be talking of inadequate revenue to execute the budget. The earnings from internal and external sources are more than enough.”

    He added: “What worries me most is the feeling that they (executive) have not been implementing the budget because of lack of funds. We are making money from two sources. From the internal source, FIRS has generated over N4 trillion this year. If you add income from crude oil export, we have surplus. This year’s budget is about N5trillion. No way, they can’t tell us that we are not generating enough to implement the budget.

    “If the reason is the result of crude oil production, they have not told us that the production falls below 20 per cent. The price of crude oil remains above 33 per cent of the projected price. The benchmark for the 2013 was based at $75. For the past one year the crude particularly Nigerian type sells for over $100 per barrel. We make extra $25 on every barrel sold. Even if we have 20 per cent fall in output, it has been more than compensated.

    “If we are not earning enough, how come we are keeping excess crude account. They are taking us as fools. We should tell them we are not, he concluded.”

    An expert in budget analysis, Dr Tunji Ogunyemi of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), said no responsible government would blame its failure to implement budget on the activities of common thieves.

    “It sounds ridiculous that oil thieves have prevented a legitimate government from realising its revenue target. It is a vote of no confidence on the security apparatus of the country.

    “The primary purpose of government is to ensure security and wellbeing of the people. The oil thieves are not ghosts. They are seen operating $3 million worth of vessel to steal oil. They own refineries all over the Niger-Delta. I have never heard of any government in the world blaming shortfall in revenue earning to oil thieves or common thieves.”

    On the performance of the budget, Ogunyemi said the capital project was frustrated in the first quarter because of the delay over the signing of the budget by the President. “The implementation of the budget starts from January 1, but the first three months were wasted as a result of the disagreement between the executive and the legislature on provisions in the budget”.

    He noted that, after the signing in February, the President returned the budget to the National Assembly for amendment. This dragged for some months before it was finally resolved in August. “Nothing was achieved in the second quarter on capital projects because rain has set in.

    “Road contractors are prevented by rain from carrying out construction work. I don’t see how the government can achieve much in the execution of capital projects. With three months to the end of the year, may be government may achieve 35 per cent budget implementation”, he added.

    A financial consultant, Idris Abubakar, observed that many sectors are not working. He said: “Those who are handling the economy are causing confusion. They give the impression that economic growth has no relationship with job creation and other concrete indices of development, he said. Abubakar said that Nigerians are being deceived about the state of the economy.

    “How can they say there is economic growth when people cannot feed or get jobs? They said they are creating jobs here and there under the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P). How many people have secured jobs under the SURE-P? You can’t just assemble 30 young unemployed people and pay them N30,000 and repeat that in another three months and you call that job creation”.

    Abubakar said the handlers of the economy think that Nigerians are fools. “The people cannot feel the impact of what the handlers of our economy are doing; it is not being felt despite all propaganda. We are in September the executive is yet to release funds for capital projects. As a result of this, ministries, departments, agencies (MDAs) are crying over non release of funds to them,” he said.

     

    A draw-back for the economy

     

    Experts say the backlog of implementation of the 2013 budget is a setback for the economy. They observed that most of the gains that could have accrued to the country, if the budget had taken effect from January 1, have been lost. Many importers were kept in a state of apprehension, due to the logjam. Specifically, they made reference to the original budget proposal submitted to the National Assembly, which contained stimulus packages for investors in the solid minerals, aviation, transport and agriculture sectors. None of the investors, who had envisaged a prompt implementation of these stimulus packages, would be able to access them until now, which is three months into the New Year.

    The contractors, who had expected quick payments for work done, or payment of mobilisation fee to the site were disillusioned. The experts conclude that the polemics that have trailed the 2013 budget is bad for the ailing economy.

     

  • Power nightmare

    Power nightmare

    THE recent confession by the Federal Government that not less than 120 million Nigerians live without electricity is despicable. Hajia Zaynab Kuchi, Minister of State for Power, after a recent Federal Executive Council meeting presided over by President Goodluck Jonathan, made the startling revelation. Professor Chinedu Nebo, Minister of Power and Kuchi’s senior colleague in the ministry was among the ministers at the briefing during the presentation of progress report of the power sector. He corroborated her position when he said that provision of electricity has become a ‘nightmare’ for the present administration.

    Hajia Kuchi was blunt when she said: “We have 160 million Nigerians now and we are only giving power to 40 million of that population. What it means is that there are about 120 million Nigerians that are without power and wish to buy power.’’ The revealed figure translates to 25 percent of Nigerians that currently have access to electricity. In the 21st century, this is indeed nightmarish in a country that is as blessed as Nigeria.

    The duo’s position that the only way to deliver power to Nigerians is by ‘serious commercialisation’ is faulty. They believe that the country can be powered through Independent Power Projects (IPPs) and collaboration of Public-Private Partnership. But we ask: Is government no longer responsible for the commercialisation of power? Should the government now be seeking for scapegoat in its futile attempt to commercialise the power sector through the IPPs?

    While it could be over-looked that natural occurrences such as storms, as posited by Prof Nebo, could wreak havoc as was the case in Bayelsa and Kebbi states where storms reportedly destroyed transmission lines, it is totally wrong to use that as absolute reason for the rapidly diminishing power supply across the country. The minister’s allusion to alleged vandalisation of power projects by some youths in Abuja will even not suffice. The truth is that there is need for total overhaul of generation and transmission networks in the nation, a thing the government is not taking seriously yet.

    The government seems to be exhuming excuses meant to exculpate official ineptitude. The minister suddenly realised mid-year that the sector is poorly funded because no fund was provided for routine maintenance of the generation and distribution companies this year. This is scandalous. The official explanation that power privatisation would have been completed since last year is equally bunkum. Is it not the government that is handling the privatisation that should be held responsible for slowing down the process?

    Despite huge government’s investment in the sector meant to guarantee stable power supply, it is sad that power generation in the country still stands at far below the desired megawatts – and most times highly epileptic or even not available for months in some areas. What then is the significance of the over $16 billion spent by the Obasanjo administration on the power sector, not to talk of the one spent by the current government that is yet to be made public.

    We doubt whether the projected December target for 10,000 megawatts is realistic with the current state of the IPPs. Nigerians only know the beginning of power contracts but are left in the dark about their terminal dates.

    It is sad that the history of power transformation has so far been that of miserable projections, failed promises and criminal defaults.

  • AFCON FINAL MISS: It’s a nightmare-Emenike

    AFCON FINAL MISS: It’s a nightmare-Emenike

    Super Eagles striker Emmanuel Emenike has described as a nightmare his inability to play in the finals of the 29th edition of the Africa Nations Cup held in South Africa.

    The 2013 Nations Cup highest goal scorer said, when it became obvious that he would not be part of the match, he was full of bitterness.

    “I want to tell you that it was like a nightmare for me when the doctors told me that I would have to rest the legs, and would not be part of the final match. It was not that I never trusted my colleagues, but because I wanted to contribute my quota to ensure that my countrymen are happy. It was not that I was eager to increase my goal tally, but to contribute to the team’s success,” he said.

    “Because, we have been working like a family, and wanted to consolidate on that. Where I was sitting all through the match, I was praying for the success of my colleagues, I thank God they lived up to all expectations.”

    On his highest goal scorer award, the Anambra state born bully striker said he dedicates the award to all Nigerians for standing behind the Super Eagles all through the tournament. “I dedicate that award to all Nigerians. They were really in support of us with their prayers, and we promise not to let them down in subsequent matches.”

    Emmanuel Chinenye Emenike was born on 10 May 1987 in Otuocha, Anambra State, and currently plays as striker for Spartak Moscow in the Russian Premier League.

    Emenike started his football career with Delta Force. Later on his career, he transferred to South African National First Division team Mpumalanga Black Aces in January 2008 and debuted against Dynamos F.C. on 17 February 2008. He scored his first goal with the team in his debut but Black Aces lost the match 4-2. He was a member of the Black Aces team that lost against Mamelodi Sundowns in the Nedbank Cup final.In May 2008 he joined First Division team F.C. Cape Town.

    In 2009 Emenike signed a one-year loan deal with Karabükspor. On the opening game of the 1.Lig season on 23 August 2009, Emenike made his debut in a 3-3 draw against Samsunspor and would score his first goal on 11 October, against Kartal. Emenike would score his first hat-trick of his Turkish career in a 6-1 win over Mersin Idmanyurdu and scored another hat-trick on 14 February 2010 in a 4-2 win over Kayseri Erciyesspor. He would on to score 16 goals in the 1.Lig, leading the club to the title and automatic promotion. Emenike won the 1.Lig Best Foreign Player award at the end of the 2009–10 season, and also had his contract extended by three years for 300.000 €.

    Emenike scored four goals in the just ended Africa Nations Cup in South Africa to emerge winner. An armstring injury he sustained in the semi final match against Mali ruled him out of the final match against Burkina Faso.

  • Traveller’s nightmare

    I arrived Nigeria only to be reminded I was home on Saturday with items missing from my luggage at our international airport in Lagos. The first sign was that the lock was off. I opened the bag, and found it was without some items. I reported to a young man in charge of such matters and he said the locks were removed by United States security. But when they did such things they put the locks back in the bag. Not in my bag.

    Good news though. The thieves may have loved the glitzy stuff but were too illiterate to know the value of books. They left my books intact. Thank God for small mercies.

     

  • No end to security nightmare

    No end to security nightmare

    In addition to the rampant insecurity undermining political stability and economic development in parts of the country, there are indications a new front could open soon to engage security operatives full time and add to their nightmares. If reports are accurate, security agencies are said to be considering various scenarios they may have to contend with when train services resume between Lagos and Kano, the most popular trunk line. Without saying so, according to the reports, security agencies may be thinking of the havoc fundamentalist groups like the Boko Haram could cause for train passengers and railway facilities. Such proaction would be of immense benefit to a country that is already spending approximately N24 billion to rehabilitate and modernise the Nigerian Railway. If the restoration work is completed on time and successfully, it should ease\ long distance commuting and freight services, and catalyse economic activities. But all it takes to bring the whole enterprise crashing down is just one bomb at any point in the over 1000km rail lines between the two major cities.

    While it is good to be proactive in anticipating and solving the problems saboteurs could cause for train services, the government must by now have recognised the need for a holistic method in tackling insecurity. This will involve the government having a deeper and better understanding of the nature of insecurity in these parts, identifying the dramatis personae of insecurity, what propels them, and what patterns of operations can be deduced from their activities so far? In addition, there must be an understanding of how best railway insecurity can be tackled? These are some of the questions the government will have to grapple with and give definitive answers to if the financial and other resources being spent on rehabilitating the antiquated railway lines are not to go down the drain.

    One approach that may prove nugatory is the reactive and ineffectual measure being deployed against the unconscionable Boko Haram Islamist sect, a group that may well prove to be the most daunting enemy of resuscitated and revitalised railway services. Combating Boko Haram required the deployment of the highest form of intelligence operations; instead the government had until recently relied more on firepower. The menace also required a security architecture that brings together all the security services; instead the government had approached the ailment with atomised network of security operations. Things are changing now, and the government may find wisdom in building on the gains and experience it has acquired in combating terrorism to prepare for the security of train services.

    But overall, the trains will never be fully or even really protected until the government can comprehensively secure the country itself and pacify restive groups. Like the problematic petroleum pipeline, which is the prime target for saboteurs, the government can never hope to secure every kilometre of the rail lines. Worse, as the government has found out in trying to secure youth corps members, it is not only an impossible task, it is in fact a foolish undertaking. Even if it were possible to assign a policeman to every youth corps member, pipeline, and rail line it would still not be possible to keep them safe, just as the police have not been able to guarantee safety for every man or establishment, including banks, they have tried to secure.