Tag: NLNG

  • NEITI ready to help NNPC in tracing NLNG’s unremitted $11.6b

    NEITI ready to help NNPC in tracing NLNG’s unremitted $11.6b

    The Group Managing  Director of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) Emmanue Ibe Kachikwu got a free offer from the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI).

    It pledged the NNPC chief executive every institutional support to recover $11.6 billion that the corporation received from the Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Ltd but failed to remit into the Federation Account.

    NEITI said: “We are particularly encouraged by the recent pronouncement of the Dr Ibe Kachikwu on remittances of all NLNG dividends directly to the Federation account as required by law and demanded by all NEITI Reports.”

    The promise was contained in a statement by NEITI’s Director, Communications, Dr. Orji Ogbonnaya Orji that the corporation’s implementation of the pending remedial issues under a plan already developed by NEITI and the Inter Ministerial Task Team (IMTT) would be beneficial to the country.

    Dr. Orji listed such issues to include: inadequate metering infrastructure for accurate measurement of crude; the onerous Joint Venture (JV) cash call regime; inefficient cost determination; urgent resolution and review of pricing issues related to expired Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and legal agreements with oil companies that have huge revenue loss implications for the nation.

    Others, said the spokesman, are: huge costs of fuel subsidy; crude oil swap and products exchange agreements; repair of the refineries; oil theft; review of existing fiscal regime in the industry; automation of record keeping and the politics of acquisition and assignments of oil blocks  by discretion among others.

    Assuring the NNPC of its cooperation, the statement added that “NEITI is ready and willing to provide further details if required.”

    NEITI said it was happy to identify with the work of the ad-Hoc Committee of five raised by the National Economic Council (NEC) to look into allegations of sharp practices in the revenue-generation agencies of government.

    The panel, chaired by Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomhole announced KPMG and the Pricewaterhouse Coopers as consultants to forensically audit the books of the agencies.

    Other members of the panel are governors: Nasiru El-Rufai (Kaduna); Akinwunmi Ambode (Lagos); Udom Emmanuel (Akwa Ibom) and Ibrahim Dakwambo (Gombe).

    In the statement, NEITI noted that one important issue it planned to the table if given opportunity, will be how the committee can assist the government to recover over $7 billion owned by oil companies.

    It said these disclosures are contained in NEITI audit reports as cases of under-payments, under-assessment’s arising from subjective interpretation of MoU and tax laws.

    NEITI stressed that “we have no doubt that our contributions will add value to the work of the committee.”

    The watchdog agency also endorsed two other decisions taken by President Muhammed Buhari’s sweeping reforms –   the recent directive on operation of a Single Treasury Account (STA) by all Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs).

    NEITI’s interest in the new policy, according Orji, was borne out of the fact that over 70 per cent of the funds involved are directly or indirectly generated from extractive industries.

    NEITI submitted: “We find the singly treasure account policy, a vital move and a major reform – driven decision that would help eliminate fraudulent practices  created by multiple revenue  accounts by government agencies.”

    On its proposal to give advice to the NNPC, the statement said: “We in NEITI are ready to offer any advise,   support, partnership and cooperation based on mutual respect to the new NNPC that is emerging under the leadership of Dr. Ibe Kachikwu.

    “This is to ensure that the NNPC conforms fully to the requirements of transparency and accountability as enshrined in the NEITI act of 2007 and the principles of the global EITI. Both the EITI and NEITI stand firmly with Nigerian citizens that revenues from oil, gas and mining should support national development and reduce poverty in our country.”

    NEITI also welcomed President Buhari’s decision to set up a Presidential Advisory Committee on Anti-Corruption under the chairmanship of by Prof. Itsay Sagay, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN).

    The statement added: “The work of this committee is not only timely but very useful. It is a good platform for all the 21 anti-corruption agencies, coordinated by the Technical Unit on Governance and Anti-Corruption (TUGAR) under the chairmanship of NEITI, to share information and offer informed advice based on experiences over the years.

    “It is our expectation that Prof Sagay’s committee will provide NEITI and all the agencies under the Inter – Agency Task Team (IATT) an opportunity to make presentations.

    “In view of the huge potentials in the mining and solid minerals sector, we urge President Buhari to please extend the on-going reforms to that sector. From NEITI’s scoping study and independent audit reports, this sector has the potential to yield more revenues for the country than oil, if given the attention it deserves.

    “One urgent step required now is to immediately check the activities of illegal miners many of whom are foreigners that have taken over the solid minerals sector without authorisation.

    “Finally, NEITI’s view remains that for these sweeping reforms initiated at the Federal level to yield results and impact on the economy, state governments need to be encouraged to find enough reasons to step down the on-going reforms at the state level.

    “This is important because of the wider implications in the revenue sharing formula, resource allocation, and efficient utilisation to meet the overall strategic national development objectives.”

  • Niger Delta youths threaten to shut down NLNG over plan to build dry-dock shipyard

    Niger Delta youths threaten to shut down NLNG over plan to build dry-dock shipyard

    Youths in the Niger Delta region have said it would mobilize youths in all Niger Delta states to protest against the Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Company (NLNG), if the company fails to reverse its decision to build a dry-dock shipyard outside its operational base.

    The youths, under the aegis of Niger Delta Youth Organizations, spoke yesterday in Port Harcourt, saying that it would shutdown NLNG facilities if all peaceful modalities failed to convince the company to reverse its decision.

    Over 30 youth organizations, including the National Youths Council of Nigeria; Rivers State chapter; Ijaw Youths Council; Bonny Youths Federation; Niger Delta People Volunteer and Salvation Front and Rivers Ethnic Youth Leaders Coalition, were in attendance at the press briefing.

    They said their grievances was predicated on the fact that NLNG decided to construct a dry-dock shipyard worth $1.5 billion dollars in an area outside its operational base and region.

    Speaking on behalf of the youth organizations, the leader of Bonny Youth Federation, Comrade Simeon Wilcox, said the NLNG did a kangaroo feasibility study without the knowledge of the stakeholders from Rivers State and the Niger Delta at large whose interest were not considered.

    He said the decision taken by NLNG was seen as a clear case of insensitivity and a provocative corporate plan, adding that the company has failed to consider the colossal unemployment rate in the Niger Delta region, especially in Bonny Kingdom.

    Comrade Wilcox said: “We are calling on President Mohammadu Buhari, Chief Nyesom Wike and honourable members of the Rivers State House of Assembly to intervene on this all-important matter in order to avert a serious anarchy.

    “We are going to shutdown the NLNG facilities if the company fails to do the needful. The youths of Rivers State and that of Niger Delta would mobilize to protest across every NLNG operational community until the company considers the interest of the region.”

  • Badagry dry dock not ours, says NLNG

    Badagry dry dock not ours, says NLNG

    The Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Limited yesterday said the Badagry Dry Dock Project did not belong to it.

    The company, in a statement, said NLNG  do not invest in the building of dry docks.

    It said: “Nigeria LNG has a singular business focus, namely processing and exporting LNG. It has no interest in investing in a dry dock anywhere in the world. The owner of the proposed dry dock in Badagry is a consortium of other Nigerian companies under the name of Badagry Ship Repair and Maritime Engineering Company (BSMEC)and which NLNG is NOT a part of.

    “NLNG’s only interest was and still remains, encouraging investors to consider building dry docks in the country to save the nation’s foreign exchange andsave local ship owners, like ourselves, the trouble of having to go overseas for dry dock services.

    “Nigeria LNG would thus be pleased to see more dry dock projects emerge in different parts of the country,but will not be investing in any.It is thus fair to add that not being an investor in dry dock, NLNG cannot dictate to investors where to site their projects.

    “Nigeria LNG therefore appeals to those who are issuing threats based on wrong information, to review their position in the light of this clarification.Besides, threats can only discourage other investors from coming to the region. Please be assured that NLNG remains a good and valuable corporate citizenhelping to build a better Nigeria.”

  • NLNG: Opening the Pandora’s Box

    From the look of things, the controversies generated by last week’s payment of $2.1 billion cash by the Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas into the federation account seems unlikely to go away anytime soon.  While there is a throng out there who couldn’t’ be bothered about the nomenclature ascribed to the “intervention” so long as funds are made available to bail out the cash strapped states, I also understand the feeling of those who insist that the payment be seen as nothing more than what it is – a timely but nonetheless routine rendition of accruals into the federation account.

    To be honest, I must confess to having a bit of difficulty accepting the idea of the NLNG cash haul as “bailout’”. To be sure, not only in the most expansive definition of the word can a measure which merely underlies the resolve of the Buhari administration to be more open and accountable to the different tiers of government can be so generously described. The confusion, in the circumstance, is perhaps best explained in the context of the lingering perception of the federal government as “Big Daddy”, and of course pervading atmosphere of despondency being experienced across the affected states.

    The issue at the moment of course goes beyond the mundane issues of semantics or nomenclature of what bailout is or what it is not. Here, we are talking about the riddles behind our perennial insolvency; the familiar story of how a vastly endowed nation, is held permanently hostage by special interests; how the economy is being bled left, right and centre by those charged with managing her affairs.

    Now, in the NLNG affair, the nation may well have opened the Pandora’s Box by that simple exercise of fiscal rectitude. Little wonder tongues are wagging; debates animated from all sides. I guess we are on to something here.

    To imagine that it all started with the mercy droplets of $2.1 billion by the NLNG. Whereas the federal government does not believe it has done anything extraordinary aside pushing its mantra of change by doing what is right by the law; the opposition PDP has been sulking that the federal government is playing the opportunism card.

    Let’s look at the claims and counter-claims by the parties. To the Federal Government, the money represents the taxes and dividends that have only fallen due for which the states are justly entitled. The opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), says the money is merely a fraction of the $5.6 billion held in some saving account somewhere ostensibly for the Buhari administration.

    Here is what the party’s National Publicity Secretary Olisah Metuh was on record to have said: “in actual fact, the LNG dividend stood at $5.6 billion even before the handover date of May 29 and would have been shared but for the insistence of former President Goodluck Jonathan that it be left for the incoming administration.” (My emphasis).

    He would add that “the issuance of the bailout with funds from the LNG proceeds and the Excess Crude Account (ECA) has exposed the fact that the PDP administration actually left behind huge sums of money, contrary to the impression earlier given to Nigerians and the international community that the new administration met a virtually empty treasury.”

    The ruling APC disagrees. Yes, there is a $5.6 billion somewhere, but it is nowhere captured in the books. According to its spokesman, Lai Mohammed, “We can tell Nigerians that apart from the said $1.6bn NLNG payment for 2015, NLNG also paid $1.4bn as Income Tax/Education Tax in May 2014, paid $0.3bn as Education Tax to the FG in 2011, 2012 and 2013 and $1.2bn in VAT and Withholding Tax to the Federal Government  since 2009….In addition, dividend payments totalling $4,728,136,946 was paid to the Federal Government between 2004 and 2009, out of which only $127,851,348.19 was credited to the Federal Government’s Independent Account with JP Morgan, leaving a balance of over $4bn. The questions to ask, therefore, are why were all the past taxes and dividends neither fully paid into the Federation Account nor shared by the three tiers of government and what happened to the funds?”

    Let’s look at the issues a bit more closely.  Let’s even assume that the opposition PDP’s claim of saving the $5.6 billion is true. If so, it seems to me as curious that the party would find nothing wrong with the Federal Government locking up such a whopping sum in some foreign account at a time most states couldn’t pay their wages. And more so at a time when its own finances are in bad shape!

    So, where is the money kept? And why was it not reflected in the handover notes to the Buhari administration? Of course, we know the truth; the money is nowhere in any bank vault – local or foreign – but are rather domiciled in some private vaults! That is a tragedy of a nation led by men with neither a shred of morality nor conscience.

    The issues here are two fold. First is whether the federal government actually believes that the money in question belongs to it in which case it could do with it as it pleased behind the states and without the knowledge of the National Assembly. The second, more ominous is the kind of rules under which the chieftains of the federal government could assume the power to stack away the funds which neither belongs to it and over which it has no powers of appropriation. One considers the latter important not only because of their constitutional import but also because they touch at the heart of the warped fiscal practices foisted on the nation by modern-day Robin Hoods purportedly sworn to defend the constitution of the republic.

    And to imagine that this is what PDP’s Olisa Metuh has striven to defend; that the money is some savings held in trust somewhere even without as much as showing the law or the authority which permit the impunity and brazen arbitrariness!

    The issues involved are certainly grave enough as it is. However, the way forward is hardly as muddy as would seem. The matter goes to the heart of the question – a fundamental one at that – of what to do with the hordes of federal leviathans, egged on by powerful interests, to operate in strict defiance of the nation’s laws.

    The APC in my view has helped frame the issue correctly: the nation surely deserves to know not just the accounts into which the NLNG taxes and dividends were paid but how these funds were utilised. The party will do well to draw up the list of similar agencies that have acted wilfully in defiance of our laws. If it amounts to opening the Pandora’s Box, or even time for retribution, so be it. The knowledge will make the nation better for it; it would also signpost the dawn of the new beginning for which Nigerians have long signalled their embrace.

    ‘The APC in my view has helped frame the issue correctly: the nation surely deserves to know not just the accounts into which the NLNG taxes and dividends were paid but how these funds were utilised’

  • $4bn NLNG cash payments ‘missing’ from govt account

    $4bn NLNG cash payments ‘missing’ from govt account

    The Presidency yesterday got a request – it should probe the whereabouts of about $4billion taxes and dividends paid by the Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Ltd.

    The payments include Income tax, Education tax and dividends.

    NLNG Managing Director Babs Omotowa told The Nation last week that the company had paid over $30 billion to its shareholders in the past 10 years.

    Into which account were the funds paid? The All Progressives Congress (APC) urged President Muhammadu Buhari to launch a probe.

    Nigeria, with a 49 per cent stake, is the single largest shareholder in the money-spinning company, which contributed $1.6 billion to the Federal Government’s multi-billion package for the states.

    Relying on facts and figures, the APC claimed that of the $4,728,136,946 paid as dividends by the NLNG between 2009 and 2014, only $127,851,348.19 made it to the Federal Government’s Independent Account with JP Morgan.

    It said the Buhari administration should tell Nigerians the whereabouts of the balance of over $4 billion.

    Explaining the NLGN role in the “bailout” cash, Omotowa said the $1.6 billion was the Income Tax and Education Tax the company paid to the Federal Government through the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) for the 2014 financial year.

    But the APC, through its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, called on the Federal Government to urgently unravel what happened to the past dividends paid to it.

    Mohammed said the probe became necessary following published reports that such remittances were never lodged into the Federation Account as required.

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), through its spokeman, Olisah Metuh, claimed that the “bailout” cash, which will help states to pay salaries from the savings left behind by the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    Metuh, who counselled President Buhari to take a cue from his predecessor by saving for the rainy day, also claimed that NLNG’s dividend stood at $5.6 billion, when Dr. Jonathan left office on May 29.

    Mohammed accused the PDP of grandstanding and standing logic on its head.

    In a statement issued in Lagos yesterday, Mohammed described as a glaring example of grandstanding opposition the attempt by the PDP to distort the facts about the source of the $2.1 billion that was approved for sharing by the three tiers of government by the President.

    The statement reads: “Whereas the Presidency corrected the initial erroneous report that the shared money was sourced from the Excess Crude Account (ECA), the skittish opposition continued to insist it was from the ECA and that it was part of the ‘savings’ by the Jonathan Administration.

    “Well, we can tell Nigerians that the $2.1 billion was sourced from the $1.6 billion Company Income Tax/Education Tax paid to the Federal Government on June 17, 2015, over two weeks after the Jonathan Administration left office, as well as the $500 million tax paid by Shell.

    “We can tell Nigerians that this is the first time the payment of the Income Tax/Education Tax by the NLNG was being disclosed by any government, in addition to paying it into the Federation Account for sharing, hence those who call it their ‘legitimate’ earnings should be asked why they did not demand the sharing of such ‘legitimate’ earnings in the past.

    “We can tell Nigerians that apart from the said $1.6 billion NLNG payment for 2015, NLNG also paid $1.4 billion as Income Tax/Education Tax in May 2014, paid $0.3 billion as Education tax to the Federal Government in 2011, 2012 and 2013 and $1.2 billion in VAT and With-holding Tax to the Federal Government since 2009. These payments are just those made in the past six years alone, hence there were other payments before then.

    “In addition, dividend payments totalling $4,728,136,946 were paid to the Federal Government between 2004 and 2009, out of which only $127,851,348.19 was credited to the Federal Government’s Independent Account with JP Morgan, leaving a balance of over $4 billion.

    “The questions to ask therefore are why all the past taxes and dividends were neither fully paid into the Federation Account nor shared by the three tiers of government and what happened to the funds.”

    The APC said the probe must be carried out in the light of President Buhari’s directive that all funds due to the Federal Government must be paid to the Federation Account as part of ways to plug financial leakages.

    The statement went on: “In an effort to restore transparency to the system, it is important to let Nigerians know why all due funds were not paid into the Federation Account in the past and what happened to such funds.

    “The party also said that as part of the investigation, the PDP must be asked where it kept the $5.5 billion which it said was the dividend paid to the Federal Government by the NLNG before the 29 May handover.

    ‘’Since, according to the PDP, President Goodluck Jonathan asked that the money be ‘left for the incoming administration to manage’, it is important for the party, therefore, to tell Nigerians in which account the money was ‘saved’ because it is definitely not in the Federation Account.”

    Insisting that an opposition must not only be factual and truthful but ‘eschew pandering to be credible’, the APC said: “Had the PDP embraced these cardinal principles, it would not have, in the rush to belittle the package that was approved for the states by President Buhari and to discredit his administration, engaged in outright lies and selective perception.

    “While the PDP became fixated on the source of the money shared by the states, it forgot that there were other measures in the package that included a special intervention fund of between N250 billion and N300 billion from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) as a soft loan available to states to access for the purposes of paying backlog of salaries.

    “The PDP also forgot the debt relief programme designed to assist the states to restructure their commercial loans of N660 billion, with a view to extending the life span of such loans and reducing the states’ debt-servicing expenditures.

    “That way, the states are freed from their perennial inability to pay workers’ salaries, and more funds are available to the various governments to use for the benefit of the people.

    “They have forgotten that the only time in the country’s history that this kind of rescue package was made was also during the tenure of Muhammadu  Buhari as military Head of State.”

    The APC advised those who are showboating and distorting facts to tarry a while, as what they have seen was just a tip of the iceberg in a long journey to clear the rot left behind by “the rudderless administration of Dr. Jonathan”.

    “The revelations concerning the deep rot in the system that will come in the weeks and months ahead will shock even the most ardent critics of the Buhari Administration’s salvaging efforts,” the party said.

  • ‘NLNG credit  rating better than Nigeria’s’

    ‘NLNG credit rating better than Nigeria’s’

    In the last few days, the Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Limited has been in the news for being the source of the fund with which the Muhammadu Buhari administration is bailing out cash-strapped states to pay workers’ salaries.  Its Managing Director, Babs Omotowa, in an exclusive interview in Lagos yesterday with Assistant Editor (News) OLUKOREDE YISHAU, shed light on the company, its operations and potentials.

    You had a meeting with the president recently. What did you discuss?

    We were very pleased to have had the privilege and opportunity to meet Mr. President. We were really very encouraged. The President of course being a former minister for Petroleum knew about NLNG. In fact, the President was one of those who actually designed the LNG when he was Petroleum minister. He was able to reminisce on his days and the dream they had of building 12 LNG plants. He was very happy at the progress we have made to have built six trains. He was very pleased about our performance. He was pleased that we are really managing the company well. He also highlighted that he wasn’t pleased that we hadn’t grown up to the 12 trains that they designed. But, he was also very clear that his government will do the needful in terms of security and ensure that the security issues we face are resolved. He was also keen to help us resolve a lot of the challenges with multiple regulations and non-competitive charges that we are facing. So, Mr. President really encouraged us and we really got a lot of motivation from that visit and we look forward to continuing to work with the new government to actualise the growth activities that we have in front of us.

    What has Nigeria and NLNG shareholders lost to the delay in the take-off of the Train Seven of your LNG plant in Bonny, Rivers State?

    Think of the fact that we recently paid $1.6 billion as Company Income Tax (CIT), aside from the dividends that we paid from our current six trains, the seventh train is 40 per cent growth on that. So, you can imagine if we had built it by now, we will have been adding 40 per cent more than the $1.6 billion. But, I think it is even much more than that. The construction of the train will create about 18,000 jobs during the construction phase. This would have created employment for a lot of people. It would have also enabled us to have brought in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) of over $10 billion for that construction phase, which would have created a lot of activities in terms of contracting, procurement of goods and services. So, jobs, money, reduction of gas flaring, these are things, I think, we would have benefitted if we had been able to put train seven on stream.

    Of recent the NLNG paid some money to the government, can you shed light on this?

    The $1.6 billion we paid on June 17 was our CIT and Education Tax. The money was paid to the Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS) as our 2014 income tax payment. You may recall that last year, we paid $1.3 billion  to the same FIRS as our CIT and Education Tax for the previous year. So, that particular amount is for tax. Dividend is a different issue and different payment. We make dividend payment to our shareholders, who include the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Shell, Eni and Total. Those dividends are paid to them quarterly or bi-annually, depending on how much cash we generate.  Of course, in the past, over the past 10 to 15 years, we have paid over $30 billion as dividends to all our shareholders.

    How much of this has gone to the NNPC?

    We can only tell you that we have paid $30 billion. Dividends are paid by the equity shareholding of each shareholder. The NNPC holds 49 per cent stake; Shell (25.6 per cent); Total (15 per cent) and Eni (10.4 per cent). Those are the percentages the dividends are paid.

    What period does the $1.6b cover?

    It is for the 2014 accounting year, which ended December. Of course, you have to do your audited accounts and you have to get that audited accounts approved and the CIT Law requires you to pay it before June ending.

    As a major player in the oil and gas sector, I suspect that you have an idea of what other companies pay to Nigeria. Is there any other company that pays as much as NLNG pays to the government coffers?

     It will be difficult for me to know what other companies pay. But, I know that in terms of CIT, we are the highest in the country. In fact, we are the highest in sub-Saharan Africa in terms of CIT. But of course, there are other payments other companies pay. Some of them pay royalties and pay other funds. We, in addition to our CIT, pay dividends to our shareholders. I think when the government looked at it last year, we were ranked the number four company by the government’s own rating. But, in that ranking, we were the number one indigenous, home-grown company because the other three are foreign companies. We believe we are in that sort of region in the top contributor to the Nigerian economy.

    Why is it difficult to get the Final Investment Decision (FID) for the Train Seven? Is the problem funding?

    Of course, it is not money. We can finance the construction of the project and we have done that for trains 1 to 6. So, it is not in doubt that we can do it. But, of course, a FID will require the gas suppliers from the upstream to be able to build their own gas gathering infrastructure and be able to send gas to us. So, for the upstream, there have been quite some challenges on the lack of the PIB to define the fiscals for them. Funding has been a big issue because of they require a lot of money from the NNPC to construct those infrastructure. Those are some of the issues we have been working to resolve. But, I think the good part about the project is that all the shareholders are committed, all the gas suppliers are committed and we already have signed sales agreement for the train seven. So, we are working through all the issues. Unfortunately, the bid for the tender for the construction that was done in 2008 has expired. So, we need to re-tender again with a new design. We need to include a lot more Nigerian content requirement into that. That will also take time to go through the bidding process, go through the Nigerian content activities we have to do on the project.

    How long more do we think it will take for the FID?

    One of the critical parts is the upstream gas suppliers. The time it takes them to get their gas projects constructed and approved. Currently, it still takes up to two years for them to get contracts approved through the bureaucracy. So, that remains one of the critical parts. For our own activities, within two to three years, we will conclude those and hopefully, within the framework of two and three-year timeline, they too should conclude theirs.

    What are the different taxes the NLNG pay to government and its agencies?

    At the federal level, we pay the CIT, which we discussed and the Education Tax. We also pay the Value Added Tax (VAT) and Withholding Tax of which we have paid over $1.4 billion over the years. Over the last 15 years, we have paid over $1.4 billion. At the state level, we also pay taxes, the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) taxes. We pay about N6 billion annually to the state government. At the local government, we also pay our local government fees and charges of over N100 million as well. And then for various agencies, including the Department of Petroleum Resource (DPR), NIMASA , Federal Ministry of Trade and Industry and a whole raft of agencies. I think we pay more than 20 agencies various fees, including the Nigerian Civil Aviation Agency (NCAA) for our airstrip… I think that is one of the big challenges in Nigeria that makes us less competitive in the global market because our operating environment is just challenging. Today, we have more than 16 people from various agencies who are in our plant from the government trying to carry out regulatory activities. This is just something that could be better streamlined.

    You just mentioned NIMASA. Have you resolved the disagreement between this agency and NLNG?

    You will recall that in 2013, we indeed went to court because we had been blockaded for more than 21 days at a huge loss to the country because today, the take of the government from the NLNG is 70 per cent from taxes, dividends and all of that. So, 70 per cent of the losses we suffer due to the problem with NIMASA are to the country, which is quite unfortunate. After we were blockaded and they refused to obey the court injunctions, we then paid under protest and after that we then went to the court and we have been in the court. There have been quite a lot of appeals by them. They have appealed to the Appeal Court, Supreme Court, most of which they have lost. But, we are following the process. We believe in the rule of law and we are confident that at the end of the day, judgment will be delivered in our favour and that this kind of extortion does not happen again in the future.

    For how many years has the NLNG been paying the CIT and Education Tax?

    We paid last year. We paid $1.3 billion last year to the FIRS. It is just more transparent under the new government that everybody seems to know. But, we did pay $1.3 billion last year to the Federation Account.

    You said about $10 billion FID will come in for Train Seven. Where will this be coming from?

    As you see when with the six ships we are building in Korea, we had to also get FDI of $1. 5 billion. We got much of that from Korean banks. KEXIM, the Korea Export Bank and KSURE, another Korean financial institution and we also got many of the international banks in the world to fund that. NLNG has such a strong balance sheet and a global name recognition that for us to borrow money is no problem. We actually have a higher credit rating than even the Nigerian credit rating. For us, we are able to finance ourselves and banks are willing to support us all over the world.

    In simple terms, what really does it mean to say NLNG contributes four per to Nigeria’s GDP?

    You measure GDP by various indices. Some of it is output and ome of it is based on jobs created. So, we have the University of Ibadan come and carry out an analysis, which was on output basis and their conclusion from that analysis is that NLNG’s contribution to the GDP was four per cent. And, I think you can even see some of that when you think of the $1.6 billion tax that we just paid, which is just one element of the several taxes that we paid. That money alone is about eight per cent of the projected revenue for 2015, from just that simple payment whereas we make several other payments on dividends, state government, local government and other regulators that we pay. I think that you can see very clearly that our contributions to the country are very significant.

    How serious is the shale gas challenge to the NLNG?

    It’s a challenge in the sense that the United States (U.S.) market, to which we were selling 35 per cent of our products when we started, is zero per cent today. And the U.S. is now self-sufficient and it is also planning to start export, which means not only have we lost the market in the U.S. but they will be competing with us elsewhere. It is such a big amount of reserve and people estimate that it could produce up to 70 metric tonnes from the U.S. per annum in the next few years. It’s a challenge but having said that, there have been various challenges over time. When Qatar came on stream, Qatar started to produce 77 metric tonnes per annum. Australia is growing significantly. They also want to get to 80 metric tonnes per annum. We are seeing Tanzania, Mozambique growth in all these areas. So indeed, the competitive space is a lot bigger than it was in the past but for us. Competition is good because it brings out the best in us. We are very proud of our reliability, which stands at about 97 per cent today. We are also proud of the fact that we are a very efficient organisation. We can compete very well and the forecast is that the demand for LNG will continue to grow. It is expected that by 2030, it would nearly have doubled because Southeast Asian countries, China, India and now use  LNG in transportation, marine and land transport that are using LNG enable that growth. We see quite a lot of up sides and opportunities despite the shale gas challenge.

    What is your response to this shale gas challenge?

    When the Shale gas came from the U.S., we were very quick to identify new markets. We were one of the first to go to Japan when the Fukushima accident occurred few years back. We have been able to find new markets in South America, in Argentina, in Brazil and we are exploring new markets as we speak, even in Southwest Asian countries. So, the Shale gas has expanded competition but it has brought creativity and has also brought the need for us to be more efficient. As I said, we are one of the foremost plants in the world; we are the single biggest industrial complex in sub-Saharan Africa and with 97 per cent reliability, we are really loved by our customers all over the world because they are sure they will get products from us. So, the Shale gas itself is an additional competition. It has only brought us more creativity from us.

    Is NLNG still number four in global LNG supply?

    Yes, we are still number four in the world in terms of LNG plants.

    Let’s talk about domestic gas supply. How involved is the NLNG?

    On the Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) side, we currently supply 80 per cent of the cooking gas in the country, which means every 10 cylinder that you see, eight are being filled with gas from NLNG. We want to grow that to two million metric tonnes per annum from the current 250,000 tonnes. There is room for 10 per cent growth and what this growth will do is to enable people to stop using the likes of kerosene, which the government is still subsiding by over $3 billion, or people chopping down trees, especially in the North, which is leading to deforestation and environmental issues.

    Let’s talk about the Nigerianisation of the NLNG. Will you say this has helped the company or things were better when foreigners were running the show?

    I think today, 95 per cent of our staffers are Nigerians. The whole management team is Nigerian. Of course, we have our Board, which consists of directors from the stake holders. And I think when you look at the company’s performance over the 15-year period, I think that we have been able to show in the period that Nigerians have been managing the plant and running the company to show that a Nigerian can also do what any foreigner can do. The company has been well-managed. Performance of our plant, the reliability is among the best in the world. Anybody who visits our plant from anywhere in the world has always been pleased with the way we have maintained it. Our customers and buyers are so proud of the reliability they get from the plant. Every day they are waiting for cargo from Nigeria, they know it will appear and we have been able to contribute what we are contributing to Nigeria and the Nigerian content part of it shows that having Nigerians have its advantages because we understand the terrain, we understand the issues, we feel the same pain and we are able to do things. When you think of what we have done on the ship construction side, how we have been able to train more Nigerians, how we have been able to get Nigerian manufacturers to be exporting products to the world, I think this shows clearly that the company is meeting its core value and vision of building a better Nigeria while being a global player. I think we have been able to demonstrate that with more Nigerians, the company has been more successful than it has been in the past.

    Where do we see NLNG in the next 10 years?

    Clearly, we see growth. We expect that in 10 years, our Trains Seven and Eight will be on stream and NLNG will be able to deliver more values to the country both in terms of financial contributions and Nigerian content. We are looking at creating many more local champions, companies that can become exporters and even global players from our efforts. We are seeing years that other companies will have seen how NLNG has been able to run a successful business and that learning would have been able to help others, be it in refineries and several other areas to also get more Nigerian companies being run as successfully as the NLNG. We are optimistic that in 10 years, we will continue to be an inspiration to the country and continue to be a key player in building a better Nigeria.

  • APC diaspora commends Buhari on bailout package

    APC diaspora commends Buhari on bailout package

    The All Progressive Congress, APC Scandinavia on Thursday commended President Muhammad Buhari for the approval of the inclusive relief packages as a bailout for the states of the federation.

    Speaking through the National Coordinator, Ayoola Lawal in a statement, APC Scandinavia described the package as one that will enable the three tiers of government to clear all salaries owed in arrears to hardworking Nigerian workers across the nation.

    Lawal further stressed that the bailout, if properly managed, will enable the states and the local councils meet their payroll responsibilities further.

    “The packages will not only go a long way in ameliorating the financial sufferings of Nigerian workers across the nation, who have without monthly payment of their salaries for several months but also alleviate the psychological pain associated with working without the ability to meet basic needs.

    “The packages include sharing of dividend paid to the Federation Account by the Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Company (NLNG), a debt relief program designed by the Debt Management Office which will help states restructure their commercial loans which is currently put at over N660 Billion, and extend the lifespan of such loans while reducing their debt-servicing expenditures.

    The National Coordinator further suggested a Central Bank-packaged special intervention fund that will offer financing to the states, ranging from N250 Billion to N300 Billion. “The CBN package be a soft loan available to states for the purposes of paying the backlog of salaries.

    “Any individual or opposition party that thinks Nigerians are gullible to beg them to come to power in 2019 after several years of looting the collective wealth of the nation and psychological torture of the Nigeria people is a jerk.

    “We in APC Scandinavia are very proud and delighted that President Buhari is showing Nigerians and the International Communities that he is a man of his words and a clear pointer that Nigerians made the right choice of voting the right party to govern them.

    “The promises made by APC and the President during the election campaigns are not the usual mantra of the past political elites of PDP. The promises are genuinely crafted out of justifiable demands and needs of an average Nigerian and a nation in dare need of real and authentic leadership,” he said.

    he therefore called for apositive change in all areas of governance, sustainable growth and development in the entire country which is devoid of political affiliations.

    “Civil servants will again see dignity in their labour and contributions to the national growth after several months of unpaid salaries and eroding pride as a civil servant.

    “We implore the governors to manage properly the packages and maximize the opportunities to deliver better governance to their constituencies,” he urged reiterating the need for Nigerians home and abroad to continue their supports, constructive criticism and prayer for the President Buhari led administration, the NASS, the governors and the APC leadership.

    This is maintained will help the ruling party to further deliver on their promises for a better Nigeria. “Welcome, all to a New Nigeria of our dream,” he summed.

  • The cash-cow called NLNG

    The cash-cow called NLNG

    The Federal Government yesterday initiated a bailout package for states owing their workers. The bulk of the money which makes up the N400 billion package is said to have come from proceeds from the Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Limited, based in Bonny Island, Finima, Rivers State. OLUKOREDE YISHAU tells the story of this cash-cow.

    It was incorporated 26 years ago. Its first cargo of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) did not leave the Bonny Port in Rivers State until ten years later. And once it took off, it appeared there was no stopping it. It rose so fast that it became the fourth largest supplier of LNG. The Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Limited, whose six-train plant produces about 22 Metric Tonnes Per Annum (mtpa) of LNG for export and five MTPA of natural gas liquids (NGLS), has made over $25 billion from a $2.6 billion investment.

    The NLNG has six-train plant worth over $15 billion and contributes four per cent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    It operates six liquefaction units (LNG trains) producing 22 million metric tonnes of LNG per year (mmtpa). Trains 1, 2 and 3 have production capacities of 3.2 mmtpa, whilst trains 4, 5 and 6 have capacities of 4.1 mmtpa each. The Final Investment Decision (FID) on the train 7 has not yet been made.

    The NLGN owns 24 ships and six additional ships are underway from Samsung and Hyundai dockyards. The six new ships will increase NLNG fleet to 30 ships. There are spiraling effects to this as the facilities will need more seafarers and ship officers to man them.

    Through its second subsidiary, the NLNG Ship Manning Limited (NSML), the NLNG is the biggest employer of Nigerian seafarers on board its 13 LNG carrier ships.

    Also, the company has a wholly-owned subsidiary set up in 1989, Bonny Gas Transport (BGT) Limited, which provides shipping services for NLNG. The BGT was set up in Bermuda with an ordinary equity holding from NLNG Limited and preferential equity holding from the sponsors, NLNG’s shareholders. Another wholly owned subsidiary of NLNG Limited is the NSML, which was set up in 2008 to provide, develop and manage high-calibre personnel for NLNG’s maritime business.

    Former Coordinating Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala visited the NLNG Plant on Bonny Island, Rivers State on November 15, 2013.

    She described the NLNG as an asset to Nigeria, a shining example of a successful company and a beacon of hope for a better Nigeria.

    The minister alluded to the fact that NLNG’s financial book was an enviable balance sheet and that told the success stories.

    “I came after looking at your books and saw that you have been commercially viable and successful. The Nigeria LNG is an asset to the country,” she said, adding that not much was in the public domain despite the very impressive performance of the company.

    Dr. Okonjo-Iweala described the NLNG as the most successful Nigerian company with 49 per cent government ownership, which she described as a distinguishing feature among companies in the public and private sector.

    The NLNG is an incorporated joint venture owned by four shareholders, namely, the Federal Government, represented by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) — 49 per cent, Shell Gas BV (SGBV) — 25.6 per cent, Total LNG Nigeria Limited—15 per cent and Eni International—10.4 per cent.

     

    The other side of the story

     

    So far, the company’s story reads well, but it could be better if its expansion plans are approved. The failure to take the final investment decision on its Train Seven has made it lose its pre-eminence in the global LNG market. There are imminent fears it will still dip further if its expansion plans are not concretised soon.

    As at the time it celebrated the export of its 3000th cargo on January 6, last year, a large expanse of land, close to its Train Six in Finima, Bonny Island, was waiting for further action to house the Seventh Train of the plant. But years after work began on sand-filling of the site, there is no definite decision on when real construction work would start.

    As a result of this, the NLNG, once the fastest growing facility in the world, has lost grounds to Qatar and Australia. Qatar has moved its output from 20 million metric tonnes to 80 million metric tonnes. Australia, from its previous 20 metric tonnes, now churns out 81 metric tonnes annually. NLNG is stuck at 22 million metric tonnes. Australia has 10 LNG projects, with 20 trains and $215 billion worth of final investment decision. Yet, Australia has only 60 percent of Nigeria’s gas reserves. Nigeria has gas reserves estimated at over 160 trillion cubic feet.

    The United States (U.S.), formerly a major LNG export destination, plans to become a net LNG exporter by 2016, with 1.1 billion cubic feet per day, projected to rise to 2.2 billion cubic feet per day in 2019.

    China, with an estimated gas reserve of 1,275 trillion cubic metres, is also planning big for the LNG market. Mozambique too is set for a fair share of the market, with plans to build a two-train facility at advanced stage.

    NLNG Train Seven project will raise the liquefaction capacity of the Plant to 30mtpa, consolidating Nigeria’s position as one of the largest producers and exporters of LNG.

     

    What really is the problem?

     

    Some have wondered if the company, which contributes 4 per cent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), does not have the financial wherewithal to see the project through.

    But checks have revealed that the company’s challenge with expansion has nothing to do with money.  Industry sources say for this Train Seven to become a reality a FID has to be taken.

    The only person who can take this decision is President Muhammadu Buhari. His predecessor, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, failed to take this all-important decision. Former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi once quoted Jonathan as telling him that NLNG’s expansion has to wait until the Brass LNG in Bayelsa State takes off.

    Instructively, seven years ago, the NLNG signed sales and purchase agreement for its seventh train. Observers are of the view that building the seventh train of the NLNG plant will bring in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) estimated at over $8 billion and help reduce flared gas, and improve the country’s revenue profile.

    With Train 7, the NLNG, said industry watchers, would provide about 10,000 jobs. Since it opened shop in Bonny, NLNG Limited has provided over 2,000 jobs each construction year and 18,000 jobs at the peak of construction. The government, they said, will also reap an additional $2.2 billion annually in dividend.

  • NLNG clarifies role in dry dock project

    The Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Limited (NLNG) has said it is only a facilitator of the $1.5 billion dockyard proposed to be built in the country and not an investor in the project as earlier reported in some media.

    According to the Manager, Corporate Communications and Public Affairs, Tony Okonedo, the clarification was made by the General Manager, External Relations, Dr Kudo Eresia-Eke when the President Rivers Entrepreneurs and Investors Forum, Mr. Ibifiri Bob-Manuel, and his team paid him a courtesy call at his office. Eresia-Eke said NLNG was only involved as a promoter of Nigerian Content.

    He said the company insisted on three elements as part of the Nigerian Content for the ship building acquisition by one of its subsidiaries, Bonny Gas Transport Limited. One of these elements was that the shipbuilders explore possibilities of creating a dry dock facility in Nigeria, training of at least 600 Nigerians in ship maintenance, and the purchase from Nigeria of local Nigerian products for the ship building project in South Korea.

    Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) and Samsung Heavy Industries (SHI) are constructing six new LNG carriers for NLNG subsidiary, Bonny Gas Transport Limited.

    Eresia-Eke stated that it was up to the investors to decide how and where to invest their money. He also highlighted that new investors are welcome to develop other dry docks anywhere in the country.

    The President of the forum, Mr. Ibifiri Bob-Manuel thanked Eresia-Eke for clearing the air.

    Nigeria LNG Limited is the most significant arrow-head of the Federal Government’s continuing efforts to eliminate gas flaring and derive value from the country’s 187 trillion cubic feet of proven gas reserves. Official statistics indicate that Nigeria’s gas flaring profile, previously one of the highest in the world has further reduced from 25 to 11 per cent.

    NLNG is owned by four shareholders, namely, the Federal Government of Nigeria, represented by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) (49 per cent),  Shell Gas BV, SGBV, (25.6 per cent), Total LNG Nigeria Limited (15 per cent), and Eni International (N.A,) N. V. S. a. r. l (10.4 per cent).