…says prosecution fails to prove forgery, criminal trespass
The Court of Appeal in Abuja has reversed the 14 years jail term handed to an official of the Nigerian Midstream Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), Harrison Ndika Uchenna, upon his conviction by a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on charges of forgery and using forged documents as genuine.
In a unanimous judgment, a three-member panel of the appellate court also reversed the trial court’s sentence of Uchenna to one year imprisonment or a fine of N50,000 upon his conviction for the offence of criminal trespass.
The judgment was on an appeal, marked: CA/ABJ/CR/634/2022 filed by Uchenna against the judgment delivered on October 11, 2021 by Justice Yusuf Halilu of the HIgh Court of the FCT.
The police had prosecuted Uchenna before the High Court of the FCT on a five-count charge in which he was accused of giving false information to the police, engaging in forgery, using forged documents as genuine and criminal trespass.
Uchenna pleaded not guilty when he was arraigned on the five-count charge, marked: FCT/HC/CR/171/2018. But, at the conclusion of trial, Justice Halilu convicted him on all the five counts.
The trial judge sentenced him to two years imprisonment or option of N50,000 fine in respect of counts one; one year jail term or option on N50,000 fine in respect of counts two and five, which relate to giving of false information and criminal trespass.
He got 14 years without an option of fine for the offences of forgery and using as genuine, forged documents as contained in counts three and four of the charge
In the lead judgment of the Court of Appeal, Justice Peter Obiorah partially allowed the appeal filed are argued for Uchenna by his lawyer, Dr. Ogwu Onoja (SAN).
Justice Obiorah held that the trial court erred in convicting Uchenna for the offences of forgery, using forged documents as genuine and criminal trespass, because the prosecution failed to prove the offences charged beyond reasonable doubt.
Raed Also: Court throws out Ajayi suit seeking disqualification of Aiyedatiwa’s deputy
The judge proceeded to discharge and acquired him on counts three, four and five dealing with forgery, using forged documents as genuine and criminal trespass.
Justice Obiorah however, affirmed Uchenna’s conviction and sentence by the trial court on counts one and two, a decision in respect of which the appellant (Uchenna) has since lodged an appeal at the Supreme Court
In a certified true copy (CTC) of the judgment, delivered on September 23, Justice Obiorah said: “I have resolved issues one and two in favour of the respondent (the prosecution).
“The effect is that the conviction of the appellant by the trial court on counts one and two, which are offences bothering on giving of false information, is correct.
“In the same vein, I have resolved issues three and four in favour of the appellant. This means that the conviction of the appellant for the offences of forgery and criminal trespass by the trial court cannot stand.
“Consequently, this appeal against the judgment of Halilu, J. of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja in Charge No. FCT/HC/CR/171/2018 delivered on 11th October, 2021, succeeds in part.
“The conviction and sentence of the appellant in respect of counts one and two of the charge whereby the trial court imposed a sentence of two years imprisonment with an option of fine of N50,000.00 in respect of count one, and one year imprisonment with an option of fine of N50,000.00 in respect of count two, is hereby upheld and
affirmed.
“The conviction and sentence of the appellant in respect of counts three, four and five of the charge, whereby the trial court imposed a sentence of 14 years imprisonment without option of fine for counts three and four, and sentence of one year imprisonment with option of fine of N50,000 for count five, is hereby set aside.
“The appellant is hereby discharged and acquitted in respect of the conviction on counts three, four and five,” Justice Obiorah said.
Justices Hamma Barka and Abba Mohammed, who were also on the panel, agreed with the lead judgment.







