Tag: Nnamdi Kanu

  • Four judges, one trial

    Four judges, one trial

    Nnamdi Kanu’s trial was filled with intrigues right from the beginning, leading to many recusals by judges.

    He was first taken before Justice Ahmed Mohammed (now a Justice of the Court of Appeal) on December 23, 2015.

    Before any steps could be taken in the case, Kanu objected to being tried before the judge, claiming he was not sure he could get justice.

    The judge withdrew from the case, following which it was reassigned.

    On September 26, 2016, Kanu and his then co-defendants were taken before Justice John Tsoho (who was then the second most senior judge of the Federal High Court).

    Justice Tsoho also withdrew from the case following a petition by Kanu’s lawyers to the National Judicial Council (NJC).

    Read Also: Play-Offs:  NFF tips Super Eagles to subdue Panthers  after pay dispute

    In the petition, Kanu’s lawyers accused the judge of making conflicting decisions in an application by the prosecution to be allowed to shield its witnesses from public view, which they claimed would not guarantee fairness and justice for the defendants.

    Ruling on September 26, 2016, Justice Tsoho (now the Chief Judge) returned the case file to the then Chief Judge, Justice Ibrahim Auta.

    The case was subsequently reassigned to Justice Binta Nyako in 2016.

    On September 24, 2024, Justice Nyako recused herself after Kanu accused her of disregarding a Supreme Court ruling granting him “unfettered access” to his lawyers.

    The case was subsequently reassigned to Justice James Omotosho, who finally delivered judgment yesterday, despite’s Kanu’s efforts to halt it.

  • TIMELINES OF THE TRIAL

    TIMELINES OF THE TRIAL

    The case of the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu has witnessed a series of dramatic events over the years.

    Kanu rose to public consciousness in 2009 when he started broadcasting through the London-based ‘Radio Biafra’.

    First apprehended in 2015 on charges of treasonable felony and membership of an unlawful organization, Kanu’s legal journey has been marked by twists and turns – his bail and subsequent disappearance in 2017 following a raid on his family house in Abia; a controversial re-arrest in 2021, and years of courtroom delays that kept him in custody till his conviction yesterday.

    Here is a timeline:

    October 14, 2015: Arrested in Lagos by the Department of State Service (DSS).

    November 23, 2015: He is first arraigned at the Wuse Zone 2 Magistrate Court, Abuja, on charges of “criminal conspiracy, intimidation and membership/leadership of an illegal organisation (IPOB)”.

    December 2015: Following developments in court, new six-count charges were filed against him, including allegations of criminal conspiracy, treason, illegal importation of a radio transmitter, possession of firearms, defamation of late President Buhari and membership of an illegal organisation.

    April 2017: Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court granted Kanu bail on health grounds and he was released after meeting bail conditions.

    September 2017: A military raid on his family home in Afara-Ukwu Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia State, leading to his disappears from public view and subsequent abscondment while on bail.

    Read Also: Play-Offs:  NFF tips Super Eagles to subdue Panthers  after pay dispute

    March 28, 2019: Justice Binta Nyako revoked Kanu’s bail and issued a bench warrant for his arrest due to his failure to appear in court.

    June 19, 2021: Kanu was re-arrested in Kenya after which was his rendition to Nigeria to answer for his alleged crimes.

    June 29, 2021: He was remanded in the custody of the DSS in Abuja by an order of the Federal High Court.

    April 8, 2022: The Federal High Court in Abuja stroke out eight of the 15-count charges against Kanu for lacking in substance.

    October 13, 2022: The Court of Appeal (Abuja Division) discharged and acquitted him, quashing all charges against him and ordering his immediate release.

    October 28, 2022: The Court of Appeal granted stay of execution of its own judgment, suspending the effect of the acquittal pending the Federal Government’s appeal at the Supreme Court.

    December 15, 2023: The Supreme Court overturned the Appeal Court’s judgment, rescinding the discharge and acquittal. The apex court returned the matter for trial on the remaining seven-count terrorism charge.

    March 21, 2025: The case file was reassigned to Justice James Omotosho, and a fresh trial schedule began.

    May 22, 2025: The Court fixed strict dates (28-29 May; 6, 16, 18, 19 June) for the prosecution to close its case.

    June 2025:  Prosecution called its witnesses and formally closed its case.

    July 18, 2025: Trial adjourned to 10 October 2025 for ruling on a “no-case” submission by the defence.

    October 16, 2025: Court adjourned trial for Kanu to commence defence from 23 October and to close by October 30.

    October 23, 2025: Kanu fired his defence counsel and stated intention to represent himself.

    October 24, 2025: Trial adjourned to 27 October after Kanu said he cannot proceed because his former counsel failed to handover his case file.

    October 27, 2025: Kanu told the court there was “no valid charge” against him; declined to call witnesses or open defence. The judge ordered him to file written address and set November 4 for further proceedings.

    October 30, 2025: Kanu filed a motion arguing that the terrorism charges were invalid because the law under which he was being tried had been repealed.

    November 4, 2025: Court gave Kanu a final opportunity to open defence on 5 November or be deemed waived but he remained defiant.

    November 5, 2025: Court ordered Kanu to open defence or adopt final written address; warning that failure meant waiver of defence rights.

    November 6, 2025: Deadline extended to 7 November; Kanu continued to challenge the legitimacy of charges under the new terrorism law.

    November 7, 2025: Judge ruled that Kanu has waived right to open defence after allocated period expired; judgment fixed for 20 November 2025.

    November 20, 2025: Kanu convicted on all seven counts and sentenced to life imprisonment on five, 20 and five years on the other two. The judge said he would have imposed the death penalty but showed mercy in line with the holy scripture.

  • Nnamdi Kanu: All hope not lost, political solution underway – Deputy Speaker Kalu

    Nnamdi Kanu: All hope not lost, political solution underway – Deputy Speaker Kalu

    Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Okezie Kalu said despite the conviction of the leader of the Indigenous People’s of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu by an Abuja High Court, political solution is under way to set him free. 

    Kalu said in a statement on Thursday that all hope for his freedom is not lost, adding that a political solution is being pursued to ultimately secure Kanu’s release. 

    Kalu also expressed confidence in President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to listen to the pleas of well-meaning Igbo leaders on the matter, saying that the President will not be averse to it. 

    READ ALSO; Senate seeks fresh solutions to rising insecurity

    He urged the people of the South East and indeed, all Nigerians to remain calm, assuring that all hope is not lost. 

    He said, “It is now time to explore political solutions that had been hindered because the matter was before the court. But now that the court has finished, it is time to intensify request for the President’s intervention and we are sure that the President is not averse to it. We are going to get it. All hope is not lost. Our people should remain calm.”

  • Why I didn’t sentence Nnamdi Kanu to death – Justice Omotosho

    Why I didn’t sentence Nnamdi Kanu to death – Justice Omotosho

    Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has explained why he opted for a life sentence instead of the death penalty for Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), who was convicted of terrorism charges on Thursday.

    The judge noted that the sentence for Nnamdi Kanu was the death penalty, but that he had to show mercy because of the teachings of the Holy Book.

    According to him, the death penalty is gradually being abolished in many countries, while religious doctrines also advocate mercy.

    READ ALSO; Senate seeks fresh solutions to rising insecurity

    Quoting a portion of the book of Matthew, Justice Omotosho pointed out that Jesus Christ taught His followers to show mercy.

    Justice Omotosho further held that Kanu’s confinement must be in a facility suitable for his status, noting that the Kuje Correctional Centre would not achieve the intended purpose of the sentence.

    He ordered that the IPOB leader be placed in protective custody at any secure location in the country.

    The court also ruled that Kanu must not have access to electronic devices unless under strict monitoring by the Office of the National Security Adviser.

    In addition, the judge ordered the forfeiture of the transmitter used for Kanu’s broadcasts to the Federal Government, adding that other equipment linked to the case would also be confiscated if no appeal is filed.

  • What you probably didn’t know about Nnamdi Kanu

    What you probably didn’t know about Nnamdi Kanu

    Nnamdi Nwannekaenyi Kenny Okwu Kanu was born on 25th September 1967 in Isiama Afara Ukwu, Umuahia.

    He is the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), which he founded in 2012. The main aim of IPOB is to restore the defunct Republic of Biafra, which existed in Nigeria’s Eastern Region during the Nigerian Civil War of 1967–1970.

    His father, Eze Israel Okwu Kanu (JP), and his mother, Ugoeze Nnenne Kanu, were traditional monarchs.

    He attended Library Avenue Primary School and went to Government College, Umuahia, for his secondary education.

    He studied at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, and moved to the UK before graduating. He maintains that he is a convert to Judaism.

    Kanu began his activism for the freedom of Biafra as a Radio Biafra director and anchor of Biafra awareness under Ralph Uwazuruike, leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), who said while in a meeting in Kaduna, Nigeria on 12 June 2014, that he handed over Radio Biafra to Nnamdi Kanu, leader of IPOB but Kanu disappointed him.

    READ ALSO; Senate seeks fresh solutions to rising insecurity

    Radio Biafra, however, was established by the defunct Biafran government in 1967 to champion the Biafran cause.

    On 18 October 2015, it was reported that Kanu had been arrested by the Department of State Services (DSS).

    Kanu has, since the beginning of his advocacy, made highly controversial comments on various occasions.

    Kanu was finally arraigned on 23 November 2015 in an Abuja Magistrate Court for the first time for charges of “criminal conspiracy, intimidation and membership of an illegal organisation” by the Department of State Services (DSS). The charges violate “Section 97, 97B, and 397” of Nigeria’s penal code. Chief Magistrate S. Usman had, at the last adjourned date, berated the Department of State Services (DSS) over its failure to produce Kanu in court on the two consecutive times the matter came up before the court.

    Kanu, through his counsel, filed an application asking the federal authorities to transfer him from the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) to prison. His lawyer, Obetta, insisted that transferring his client to prison would enable him to have easy access to his legal team.

    While in court, the Department of State Services (DSS) requested the Wuse Zone 2 Senior Magistrates’ Court to discontinue the trial of Nnamdi Kanu under section 108(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015. Idakwo further said the Department of State Services (DSS) had obtained an order from the Federal High Court, Abuja, dated 10 November, to detain the accused in its custody for 90 days.

    In 2017, the federal government designated IPOB as a terrorist organization, a move that Kanu and his supporters have consistently rejected.

    The IPOB leader’s counsel, Kanu Agabi, had expressed concerns about his client’s deteriorating health, citing medical reports that revealed liver and pancreatic complications, a lump under his armpit, and low potassium levels.

    However, the Nigerian Medical Association’s report on Nnamdi Kanu’s health status has revealed that he is fit to continue facing the trial.

    In December 2020, Kanu announced that IPOB had organized the Eastern Security Network (ESN), which was supposed to defend the South East, but the federal government regarded the formation of a non-state-sanctioned paramilitary organization as unacceptable. The situation escalated in January 2021 when the Nigerian military was repelled in an attempt to expel the ESN from Orlu, Imo.

    On November 20, the Federal High Court in Abuja convicted Biafra agitator Nnamdi Kanu for acts of terrorism and his membership of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

    Justice James Omotosho sentenced Kanu to life imprisonment. Omotosho said he ought to sentence him to death, but for his decision to show him mercy.

    He was convicted of carrying out terrorist acts, issuing illegal stay-at-home orders in the southeast region for years, incitement, teaching people to make bombs to be used on government facilities, and membership in a terrorist organisation.

    Kanu was convicted of all seven counts preferred against him, even though the IPOB leader pleaded not guilty to the charges.

  • TIMELINE: Nnamdi Kanu’s arrest, trial, conviction since 2015

    TIMELINE: Nnamdi Kanu’s arrest, trial, conviction since 2015

    The case of the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has witnessed a series of dramatic events over the years.

    He has had a history of arrests and legal battles with the federal government.

    Kanu rose from relative obscurity to public consciousness in 2009 when he started broadcasting through the London-based ‘Radio Biafra’, which was very popular among listeners in the South-East.

    First apprehended in 2015 on charges of treasonable felony and terrorism, Kanu’s legal journey has been marked by dramatic twists – his bail and subsequent disappearance in 2017, a controversial re-arrest in 2021, and years of courtroom delays that have kept him in custody over the years.

    The Nation takes a look at the chain of events to refresh your memory.

    Here is a timeline of Kanu’s arrest, trial, and conviction:

    October 14, 2015 — Kanu was arrested in Lagos and was detained for more than a year.

    He was arraigned by the Federal Government on an 11-count charge bordering on terrorism and treasonable felony.

    November 23, 2015 — Kanu was arraigned at the Abuja Magistrate Court for charges of “criminal conspiracy, intimidation, and membership of an illegal organisation” by the Department of State Services (DSS).

    April 28, 2017 — Kanu was released from detention on bail. He was granted bail by Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    March 28, 2019 — Justice Binta Nyako revoked the bail that was granted to Kanu on health grounds and issued a bench warrant for his arrest.

    September 2017 — Kanu disappeared from public radar after his home was raided by the military.

    He reportedly fled the country after the invasion of his home in Afara-Ukwu near Umuahia, Abia State, during the military’s ‘Operation Python Dance II’ staged to quell agitation for the Biafra Republic in September 2017.

    September 20, 2017 —The federal government obtained a court order to designate IPOB a terrorist group and to proscribe it.

    READ ALSO; Senate seeks fresh solutions to rising insecurity

    February 19, 2018 — The Federal High Court in Abuja ordered that Kanu be separately tried from the rest of his co-defendants.

    He was facing a five-count treasonable felony charge alongside four other pro-Biafra agitators – Chidiebere Onwudiwe, Benjamin Madubugwu, David Nwawuisi, and Bright Chimezie.

    November 26, 2020 — A Federal High Court in Abuja commenced Kanu’s trial, in his absence. Five prosecution witnesses were provided to testify against Kanu.

    January 27, 2021 — The Federal High Court in Abuja continued the trial of Kanu. The matter was initially fixed for hearing on Nov. 26, but when it was called, both Kanu and his counsel, Mr Ifeanyi Ejiofor, were absent in court.

    The notice was served on the federal government’s prosecution team and Ifeanyi Ejiofor, the defendant’s counsel.

    On June 19, 2021, he was re-arrested in Kenya and subsequently returned to Nigeria via alleged rendition.

    June 29, 2021 Court remanded him in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) in Abuja.

    July 26, 2021 — The Federal High Court, Abuja, ordered that Kanu be remanded in the Department of State Service (DSS) facility, pending the trial continuation.

    April 8, 2022 – Federal High Court strikes out eight of the 15-count charge against him, finding they lacked substance.

    October 13, 2022 – Court of Appeal orders his immediate release from detention and quashes the charges against him.

    December 15, 2023 – The Supreme Court of Nigeria overturns the appellate court’s decision and restores the remaining seven-count terrorism charge for trial.

    March 2025 – A new judge, James Omotosho, takes over the trial file. The court orders an “accelerated hearing” of the case.

    May 22, 2025 – Court sets strict dates (28-29 May; 6, 16, 18, 19 June) for the Federal Government to close its case.

    July 18, 2025 – Trial is adjourned to 10 October 2025 for ruling on a “no-case” submission by the defence.

    October 16, 2025 – Court adjourns the trial to commence his defence on October 23 and gives him until October 30 to close his defence.

    October 23, 2025 – Kanu fires defence counsel, to represent himself

    October 24, 2025 – Court adjourns trial to October 27 after Kanu says he cannot proceed with his defence because his former legal team has not handed over his case file.

    Oct 27, 2025 – Kanu tells the court he has reviewed the prosecution’s case and finds “no valid charge” against him, and he declines to open his defence or call witnesses. The judge orders him to file a written address on his position and also set further dates (November 4) for proceeding.

    Oct 30, 2025 – Kanu files a fresh motion seeking the striking out of the terrorism-related charges, arguing there is no law under which he is being tried.

    Nov 4, 2025 – In court, the judge (James Omotosho) gives Kanu one final opportunity to open his defence on November 5 or risk being deemed to have waived his right to do so. The judge again urges him to consult a criminal-law expert. Kanu reiterates his position that no valid law underpins the charges.

    Nov 5, 2025 – Court orders Kanu to either open his defence or adopt a final written address, warning that failure to do so would amount to waiver of his defence rights.

    Nov 6, 2025 – Court extends deadline: Kanu is given until Nov 7, 2025 to open his defence or waive his rights. He again challenges the legitimacy of the charges, saying the relevant law (Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act) has been repealed.

    Nov 7, 2025 – Justice Omotosho rules that Kanu has waived his right to open his defence after the six-day period allotted for that expired. The court then fixes November 20, 2025 as the date for judgment in his terrorism case.

    On the same day, Kanu files a motion challenging the competence of the charge and the court’s jurisdiction, arguing the offence is based on statutes that have been repealed. The judge holds those motions would be determined at judgment, not at this stage.

    November 20 – The Federal High Court in Abuja convicted Biafra agitator Nnamdi Kanu for acts of terrorism and his membership of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

    Justice James Omotosho sentenced Kanu to life imprisonment. Omotosho said he ought to sentence him to death but for his decision to show him mercy.

    Kanu was convicted of all seven counts preferred against him even though the IPOB leader pleaded not-guilty to the charges.

  • UPDATED: Court sentences Nnamdi Kanu to life imprisonment

    UPDATED: Court sentences Nnamdi Kanu to life imprisonment

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced Nnamdi Kanu of the proscribed separatist group Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) to life imprisonment upon his conviction on the offence of terrorism.

    Justice James Omotosho, while concluding his judgment on Kanu’s trial on Thursday, sentenced him to life imprisonment in relation to counts one, two, four, five, and six of the seven-count charge in which he was prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS).

    For count three, relating to the offences of belonging to a proscribed terrorist group, Justice Omotosho sentenced him to 20 years imprisonment without an option of fine.

    READ ALSO; Senate seeks fresh solutions to rising insecurity

    On count seven, bordering on his unlawful importation of a radio transmitter for the purpose of furthering the clandestine activities of Radio Biafra, which is not registered in Nigeria, the judge sentenced him to five years imprisonment without an option of fine.

    The judge, who noted that Kanu had been unruly all through the trial, said the law allowed the court to sentence him to death for the terrorism offences, but that he (the judge), as a Christian, chose to be merciful to the defendant.

    Justice Omotosho ordered that the defendant be kept in protective custody in any part of the country, but not in Kuje prison, Abuja, and that the radio transmitter be forfeited to the Federal Government.

  • BREAKING: Nnamdi Kanu sentenced to life imprisonment

    BREAKING: Nnamdi Kanu sentenced to life imprisonment

    Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu to life imprisonment. 

    READ ALSO; Senate seeks fresh solutions to rising insecurity

    The judgement was delivered in Kanu’s absence after the IPOB leader insisted that the judgement would not be delivered in the terrorism charge the Federal Government entered against him.

    Details shortly… 

  • BREAKING: Terrorism: Prosecution seeks death penalty for Nnamdi Kanu

    BREAKING: Terrorism: Prosecution seeks death penalty for Nnamdi Kanu

    …court to pronounce sentence by 4 pm

    The prosecution in the terrorism trial of Nnamdi Kanu of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to sentence him to the maximum punishment of the death penalty.

    Prosecuting lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) said more than 75 security personnel lost their lives due to the terrorist activities of Kanu, his groups and followers, while many other innocent Nigerians were also killed and public property destroyed.

    READ ALSO; Senate seeks fresh solutions to rising insecurity

    Awomolo said the subjection of Kanubto to the maximum punishment will serve justice to all the victims of his acts of terrorism.

    Justice James Omotosho has stood down proceedings in the case till some minutes to 4 pm for him to pronounce sentence.

    Details shortly…

  • BREAKING: Court convicts Nnamdi Kanu on all seven counts

    BREAKING: Court convicts Nnamdi Kanu on all seven counts

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has convicted Nnamdi Kanu of the proscribed separatist group, Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), on all the offences contained in the seven-count terrorism charge.

    Justice James Omotosho, in his ongoing judgment in Kanu’s trial, found him guilty on all the counts in the charge being prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS).

    Justice Omotosho held that the prosecution led sufficient credible evidence to establish its case against Kanu.

    The judge said the court has no option but to believe the evidence as led by the prosecution since the defendant failed to enter his defence, but chose to gamble by resting his case on that of the prosecution.

    Justice Omotosho is still reading the remaining part of the judgment

    Details shortly…