Tag: Omoyele Sowore

  • Alleged cyberstalking: Court rejects Sowore’s documents in trial on false claim against Tinubu

    Alleged cyberstalking: Court rejects Sowore’s documents in trial on false claim against Tinubu

    • Frowns at report of live-streaming of proceedings

    In two rulings yesterday, a  Federal High Court in Abuja rejected two sets of documents tendered by politician and online publisher, Omoyele Sowore, in his ongoing trial on a cyberstalking charge.

    Sowore is being prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS) for allegedly making a false claim against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu by referring to him as a criminal in a post he made on his “X” and Facebook accounts.

    In the first ruling, Justice Mohammed Umar declined an oral application by Sowore’s lawyer, Marshall Abubakar, that a set of documents, comprising printouts of publications, be admitted in evidence.

    The publications included media reports about DSS’ dismissal of 115 officials for misconduct, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) charging five ex-governors with corruption, EFCC’s sacking 27 of its officials over fraud and misconduct and EFCC’s arrest of some former workers of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) over N7.2 billion fraud.

    In the ruling, Justice Umar agreed with prosecuting lawyer, Akinlolu Kehinde (SAN), that the best opportunity for the defendant to tender the documents is during his defence.

    The judge held that since the first prosecution witness (PW1), being cross-examined by Abubakar, said he knew nothing about the publications contained in the documents, such documents could not be tendered through the witness.

    Read Also: PDP condemns Senate’s rejection of electronic transmission of results

    “You cannot tender a document through a witness who said he did not know anything about it.

    The document is marked as rejected,” Justice Umar said.

    In the second ruling, the judge rejected another set of documents, which comprised the printouts of publications.

    Abubakar said the documents showed that President Tinubu had in 2011 called then President Goodluck Jonathan a drunkard and a sinking fisherman; he also called former President Olusegun Obasanjo an expired meat.

    The judge marked the documents rejected for the same reason he gave in rejecting the first set of documents.

    Justice Umar frowned at the report by the prosecution lawyer that a member of the defence team had live-streamed previous proceedings in the case and urged the court to order an investigation to identify the person behind it.

    Although Abubakar denied that any member of the defence team was involved and claimed that it could have been done by the DSS or people in the presidency, the judge said such conduct amounted to contempt of court.

    Abubakar urged the court to only caution against a repeat of such an incident but to decline the request by the prosecution lawyer that an investigation be ordered by the court.

    Justice Umar said it was easy to identify the person behind the incident and that he could direct security agencies to investigate the issue because it was a serious matter.

  • JUST IN: Police declare Omoyele Sowore wanted

    JUST IN: Police declare Omoyele Sowore wanted

    The Lagos State Police Command has declared activist and politician Omoyele Sowore wanted over alleged plans to incite public disorder and obstruct major roads across the state.

    Commissioner of Police, Olohundare Jimoh, announced this on Monday while addressing journalists at the Iyana-Oworo end of the Third Mainland Bridge.

    According to him, the police are closing in on Sowore and other individuals accused of coordinating activities aimed at disrupting public peace.

    Read Also: Sowore reacts as Police declare him wanted

    “Sowore should surrender at the nearest police station or face arrest wherever he is found.

    “Anyone attempting to cause disturbance or block our roads will face the full weight of the law,” Jimoh warned.

    The police chief said intelligence reports revealed alleged plans by Sowore and his associates to stage demonstrations at key locations, including Third Mainland Bridge, Lekki Tollgate, and Freedom Park.

  • Cowardice on four feet

    Cowardice on four feet

    Just as well: it ended a damp squib — Omoyele Sowore’s much touted rally to willy-nilly spring Nnamdi Kanu, the IPOB leader, on trial for grave terrorism charges.

    Just as well, too: Kanu announced the start of his defence, never mind his soap opera stunts — and taunts.  The trial court has ordered, and his defence he must enter.

    Both developments reinforce a critical canon of civil society: that the majesty of due process can never be halted by cynical agitations — or how else do you describe the Sowore rascality of October 20, pushing the democratic right to citizen protest, to stall the sacred principle of due process: the hallowed backbone of any democracy?

    Still, Shakespeare was right: it was all “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”! A juvenile scheme to stall a court process was never more asinine!

    Indeed, Kanu’s cowardice, on four feet, is never clearer!  No less clear is his arch-delusion — and his proxies’ — that their braggadocio could indeed stop a criminal trial.

    Simon Ekpa, already nestling in jail in Finland, on his judicial day of reckoning, blabbed he was a content creator — a content creation that claimed lives and hewed limbs, of prominent Igbo folks as Dr. Chike Akunyili, the late Dora Akunyili’s husband; and non-Igbo, as Adamawa’s Ahmed Gulak!  Ekpa got his due.

    Kanu too has pushed his glorious right to agitation. Perhaps the Nigerian court would find for him, though the Finland court trashed Ekpa’s fib of content creation? 

    So, those busy hailing his juvenile showmanship in the dock, after he had sacked his lawyers, had better warn him he might just be nailing himself. The severe beauty of the judicial process is real.  It’s no Nollywood movie!

    Still, to float or to sink is a democratic choice.  But those first to scream and bawl and screech and screed “injustice!”; those who zealously boom “victimhood!” must apply their minds to the grim sequel of cynically skewing a court process; and the blatant injustice that grinds on the civil society, which apogee is that legal process.

    That’s what Kanu is up to. It’s in-your-face cowardice on four feet!  But when the sure outcome descends, let no one go berserk with cheap moans.

    After a long rigmarole that dates back to 2015, the present case is nearing a climax. The prosecution has closed its case, after calling witnesses; and tendering documents.

    But Kanu blustered with of a “no-case” submission, which the court threw out. To start his defence, Sowore hopped in with stunts, starry-eyed Kanu zealots  in tow.

    Clearly, Sowore and Kanu think the court is a place to catch a cruise, with thrilled plebs on the sidelines thundering with cheers.

    Take Sowore.  In fashionable lack of introspection, he’s nonpareil.  As if caught by a bug, he worked himself into a lather, drawing “Revolution Now!” graffiti all over the place!  It was his signal of an anarchist’s paradise! 

    But the late President Muhammadu Buhari would have none of that rubbish.  What followed was a period of arrest, detention and trial, until new President Bola Tinubu’s Justice Minister, Lateef Fagbemi, entered a nolle-prosequi.

    But not even that could wean Sowore off hare-brained agitations, hyped by brazen lies, spewed by his Sahara Reporters, now a virtual rag.

    During the so-called “Days of Rage”: the “End Bad Governance” protests, of 1-10 August 2024, Sowore and his “Take it Back” ensemble plunged into the fray!  Less than one year later, 7 April 2025, another “Take it Back” comedy, which drew little traction.

    From Sowore and co, it’s anarchy yesterday, anarchy today, anarchy forever.  With that troubled mindset, he romped into the Kanu matter.  Still, who in his right senses would follow Sowore in anything?  Apparently, though the “Free Kanu Now” protests proved a burlesque, many Kanu zealots still fell for it.  Gullible!

    Like Sowore, Kanu has not shown much sobriety, since his unfortunate saga broke on us.  Those blaming others for his prolonged trial are entitled to their crass pity party.  But even they know such a stance is a fraud.  Nnamdi Kanu is Alpha and Omega of his own fate.  No other one!  The facts are there for all to see.

    On 28 April 2017, he got bail on certain conditions: not to address any gathering, or grant a press interview. But he scorned his bail terms with a frenzy, abusing and traducing everyone, while those that stood surety for him looked askance.

    He claimed the Army invaded his space allegedly to kill him — maybe: and you can only be alive to fight any battle.  That would appear his prime reason for jumping bail.

    But does that also justify, from a safe haven abroad, the rabid launch of unvarnished sedition: raw hate against the non-Igbo: beasts, he claimed, in a zoo called Nigeria? 

    Does that justify the slaughter of fellow Igbo, caught in IPOB-decreed wrong places, during the so-called Monday sit-at-home strikes? Kanu himself — on record — bragged that anyone caught would be killed — a sickly threat the jailed Ekpa took to a grotesque new low from Finland!

    Read Also: Prioritise impact over building mega churches, Pastor Tobi urges Nigerian clerics

    Does that justify the mass slaughter in Orsu, in Imo, whose folks claim they had lost no less that 5, 000 kith-and-kin, over four years?  Their forest bore brazen criminality, allegedly by IPOB and the Eastern Security Network (ESN): rotten and smelly skulls and bones, and decayed remains of fellow Igbo!

    Does that justify the Kanu 2020 EndSARS pure lunacy: his deranged order to “burn down Lagos!” — and the high casualty figure of security agents on lawful duty?  Why, that Kanu mob even torched The Nation head office in Lagos!

    Does that justify Kanu’s endless uncourtly drama?  He lampooned the trial judge, Justice Binta Nyako, in the open court; and abused Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN — old enough to be his father, and, on all counts, far more accomplished — and all for what?  To press his democratic right to be rude, crude and uncouth?

    He would later apologize for his arrogant excitability, after the judge had stepped down.  But did he think that delinquency would halt the process?

    Then, the latter-day bombast of sacking his entire legal team, growling at his lawyers to “shut up! while I’m talking!”, the infantile “threat” to defend himself though he is no lawyer, and finally — on October 27 — his comic back-off from even that; and his claim (even after a definitive court ruling), that his “no case” submission was valid!  What hubris!

    Again, is he so delusional to think all this vile drama would make the case vanish?

    Let’s be very clear.  Nnamdi Kanu is no Obafemi Awolowo, whose 1962/63 treasonable felony trial, and the suspect way it was conducted by the then powers-that-be, are still a subject of controversy, some 62 and 63 years later.

    Nor is he MKO Abiola, who some misguided political soldiers thought they could cheat, annul his hard earned June 12, 1993 presidential election, and live happily ever after.  It took MKO’s martyrdom — a most costly act of cowardice from Abiola’s oppressors — to violently kick them out of their even costlier delusion. 

    They — too late — found out there’s no rest for the wicked!

    Whatever Nnamdi Kanu does in the dock is all on him. But he is charged with terrorism.  Those charges won’t just vanish, because he and his supporters are are playing games. And no evil can turn to good, because of the comedy of ethnic exceptionalism, as not a few are foolishly blabbing. 

    The law will take its course and heavens will not fall!  That’s due process: justice for Kanu, justice for the state, justice for the rest of us.  No more.  No less.

  • JUST IN: Police re-arrest Omoyele Sowore after bail

    JUST IN: Police re-arrest Omoyele Sowore after bail

    Politician and publisher Omoyele Sowore, has been re-arrested by the Nigerian Police shortly after his court appearance at the Kuje Magistrate Court on Friday.

    He was reportedly re-arrested on a fresh charge.

    Sowore, with Nnamdi Kanu’s brother, Prince Emmanuel Kanu, a former member of Kanu’s legal team, and ten others, had earlier met their bail conditions.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Court grants bail to Sowore, 13 others at N500,000 each

    The court granted them bail in the sum of ₦500,000 each, with two sureties residing in the Federal Capital Territory and possessing valid identification and three years of tax clearance.

    Despite fulfilling the bail conditions, only Sowore was reportedly picked up and whisked away by police officers to the Kuje Prison shortly after the proceedings.

    Details shortly…

  • Omoyele Sowore: Making business of dissent

    Omoyele Sowore: Making business of dissent

    SIR: Behind the façade of activism lies a business model built on foreign sympathy. Omoyele Sowore knows exactly what he’s doing — not out of conviction or genuine ideological drive, but as a calculated effort to sustain the image he has carefully built over the years. He understands that the stream of funding from certain international organizations and advocacy groups depends on his ability to remain visible and loud in Nigeria’s political space. Having positioned himself as a champion of democracy and human rights, he continues to draw attention — and by extension, financial support — from institutions that thrive on narratives of state repression and civic struggle in Africa.

    Organizations that typically fund such ventures include press freedom groups, democracy and governance foundations, and human rights watchdogs based in North America and Europe. These bodies often provide grants for activities framed as civic enlightenment, media independence, or grassroots mobilization. Sowore has mastered the art of speaking the language that resonates with them — words like resistance, liberation, and citizen awakening. Yet behind the slogans, his activism increasingly resembles a performance designed to justify the inflow of donor funds rather than a sincere crusade for reform.

    Read Also: Tinubu mourns Christopher Kolade, describes him as “one of Nigeria’s intellectual treasures”

    Over the years, Sowore has been associated with or has helped organize protests such as the #RevolutionNow movement, the End Bad Governance campaign, and several other demonstrations calling for “Days of Rage.” Each episode garners headlines, sparks fleeting social media fervour, and reinforces his standing as a dissident figure — the kind that international funders like to identify with. But beyond the noise, there is little in terms of structured engagement or measurable transformation.

    What emerges, sadly, is a brand of activism that has become a livelihood. It thrives on outrage and spectacle rather than on disciplined organization or lasting policy influence. His theatrics may keep him in the headlines and his accounts credited, but they do little to move Nigeria closer to the ideals he claims to defend. The real heroes of reform are those who work quietly, without foreign sponsorship or self-promotion — Nigerians who labour daily for change without needing to perform it.

    • Femi Adefemiwa, New York, United States.  
  • UPDATED: Why we arrested Omoyele Sowore in Court — Police

    UPDATED: Why we arrested Omoyele Sowore in Court — Police

    The Police have explained why its Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Command arrested 2023 presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore.

    The Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Benjamin Hundeyin, said Sowore was taken into custody for allegedly leading protesters into a restricted area in Abuja in defiance of a subsisting court order.

    Hundeyin, who addressed journalists in Abuja on Thursday, said the activist would be charged to court once investigations are concluded.

    According to him: “Today, Omoyele Sowore has been arrested by the Nigerian Police Force. You may ask why he was arrested. The reason is straightforward. 

    “The thirteen people previously arrested all mentioned that Sowore led them into the restricted area,l in clear contravention of the court order”.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Police pick up Sowore at Court premises

    He added that it would be unjust to prosecute those earlier arrested while leaving out the person alleged to have led them.

    According to him, eight persons were initially arrested on Monday in front of Transcorp Hilton, Abuja while five others were picked up around the Ministry of Finance, bringing the total number of suspects to thirteen.

    “They were arraigned the very next day and did not spend up to 24 hours in our custody,” Hundeyin said, adding that Sowore would also be arraigned soon.

    The police spokesman stressed that the protest breached the restriction order issued to maintain public order within parts of the capital.

  • Kanu’s ‘delayed’ trial: Whose fault?

    Kanu’s ‘delayed’ trial: Whose fault?

    On Monday, some people led by Omoyele Sowore protested what they called the ‘delayed’ trial of Nnamdi Kanu of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) fame. Kanu was first arrested in October 2015. In November, he was arraigned in an Abuja Magistrate’s Court. In December, he was ordered released by a Federal High Court. That same month, the government brought a fresh treasonable felony charge against him.

    In 2016, three different courts ordered that he be remanded on grounds of national security. In May of the same year, he took his case to the ECOWAS  Court. In April, 2017, Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, Abuja, granted him bail. He fled from his home in Abia State shortly after in September when soldiers came calling. So, when his case resumed in October, he was not in court. Some four years later, Kanu was brought back home in June 2021 as a ‘fugitive’. His case resumed before Justice Nyako about three months later and his bail was revoked.

    Read Also: Kukah: why Nigeria should not be linked to religious genocide

    Following series of theatrics and his allegation of bias against Nyako, the case was transferred to Justice James Omotosho. Before the transfer, Nyako had in 2022 asked him to answer to seven of the 15-count charge preferred against him, after expumging eight. Kanu appealed and the Court of Appeal found in his favour. The appellate court discharged, but did not acquit him of the offence. Under criminal law, such a discharge is temporary; the defendant risks being retried if there is fresh evidence to do so. To say that Kanu was freed by the appeal court is, therefore, wrong since he was not acquitted.

    His trial began afresh (de novo) in 2024 before Omotosho. The prosecution closed its case in March 2025. Since then Kanu has not opened his defence. Rather, he brought a no-case submission which Omotosho dismissed in September. The judge ordered him to enter his defence. Kanu did not. He claimed that he could not stand trial because he is ill. The court invited the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) to examine him. NMA did and reported back that he is fit to stand trial as his ailment is not life-threatening. The court consequently gave him between today and October 30 to open and close his case.

    Will he avail himself of this grace period to open his case or will he, his lawyers who should know better, and the rabble rousing protesters still resort to extrajudicial means to politicise a criminal case? Sowore and co. should stop this public show which will not get Kanu anywhere. They should let the law and not sentiment speak. Kanu, who has been in custody for over four years now, wears the shoe and he knows where it pinches.

  • Sowore: When activism becomes complicity

    Sowore: When activism becomes complicity

    Sir: Omoyele Sowore’s decision to mobilise Nigerians to “free” Nnamdi Kanu, an individual whose words and followers have brought blood and terror upon innocent citizens, is not activism. It is a dangerous act of moral blindness that insults the memories of the dead and the pain of the living.

    Let’s be clear: no one is attacking Sowore’s right to protest. Peaceful dissent is the cornerstone of democracy. But when a so-called protest glorifies someone who, on record — both in video and audio — called for Nigerians to be killed, properties to be burned, and the nation to be torn apart, then that protest becomes a national disgrace.

    Freedom of expression is not a licence to excuse terror.

    The facts are undeniable. Under Nnamdi Kanu’s directive, mobs took to the streets of the Southeast, enforcing illegal sit-at-home orders, burning markets, attacking police stations, and murdering innocent people — including the very Igbos they claimed to defend. The region once celebrated for commerce and education now lives under a reign of fear.

    Parents are afraid to send children to school. Traders are afraid to open their shops. The blood of countless Nigerians cries out for justice.

    Read Also: Blaqbonez’s diss track ‘ACL’ tops Apple Music Nigeria Chart

    And yet, instead of standing with victims, Sowore has chosen to side with their tormentor. What does he seek to achieve — chaos? Relevance? A new round of unrest? History will remember that when Nigerians needed moral clarity, a man who once fought for liberty decided to flirt with anarchy.

    Even more telling is that Kanu’s right-hand man, Simon Ekpa, has been convicted and jailed in Finland for promoting terrorism — a conviction that further exposes the global dimension of this criminal enterprise. If a European court, after fair trial, can recognise the terror this movement unleashed, why should any responsible Nigerian pretend otherwise?

    True activism demands conscience, not convenience. You cannot claim to defend human rights by defending a man who trampled on the rights of others. You cannot preach democracy while empowering those who destroyed democratic order in their own homeland.

    Leadership comes with responsibility, and words have consequences —especially in a nation still healing from division and bloodshed. If there are genuine concerns about Nnamdi Kanu’s treatment, let the courts handle it. Let his lawyers pursue justice through the proper channels. But no Nigerian with a conscience should march in support of someone whose followers turned towns into war zones and villages into graveyards.

    The Southeast deserves peace, not propaganda. Nigeria deserves healing, not hostility. And Sowore must be reminded that no one — not even a self-styled revolutionary — has the moral right to defend those who have waged war against their own people.

    Activism without conscience is complicity. And any protest that ignores the blood of the innocent is not freedom — it is betrayal.

    •Chief Abiola Falayajo, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Alleged misinformation: DSS urges X to deactivate Sowore’s account

    Alleged misinformation: DSS urges X to deactivate Sowore’s account

    •Activist’s lawyers ask service provider to ignore request

    The Department of State Services (DSS) has written X to suspend and deactivate the account belonging to controversial activist and publisher, Omoyele Sowore.

    It accused him of spreading false information capable of inciting violence and threatening national security.

    The DSS gave X Corp. 24 hours to act on the demand.

    But Sowore’s lawyers have urged the international service provider to ignore the request by the secret police.

    In a letter, dated September 6 and addressed to the Chairman and CEO of X Corp. in Bastrop County, Texas, by B. Bamigboye on behalf of the Director General of the DSS, the secret police referred to a post Sowore made on his verified handle, @YeleSowore, on August 25. The letter was posted on the verified DSS handle, @OfficialDSSNG, yesterday.

    The post by Sowore reads: “This criminal @officialABAT actually went to Brazil to state that there is NO MORE corruption under his regime in Nigeria. What audacity to lie shamelessly!”

    The DSS described the comment as a direct attack on the President through his official communication channel, @officialABAT, and said it “has attracted widespread condemnation by majority of Nigerians, some of whom may resort to unwholesome activities to vent their grievance over it, especially supporters of the President who have started taking to the streets in protest, thereby creating political tension and threatening the country’s national security”.

    The secret police maintained that the tweet violated several Nigerian laws, including Section 51 of the Criminal Code Act; sections 19, 22, and 24 of the Cyber Crimes Act, 2025, as well as provisions of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

    “It is not in doubt that the (use of) words employed by Mr. Omoyele Sowore is misleading information, online harassment and abuse, willful intention of furthering an ideology capable of serious harm, hate speech, cause disunity, discredit/disparage the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria within the Comity of Nations to damage the image of Nigeria and cause serious threat to national security of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” the letter stated.

    The DSS insisted that X Corp. must “immediately take down the tweet and its attendant retweets,” and further demanded the ban or deactivation of Sowore’s verified account as well as any other accounts maintained by him.

    “This demand is unequivocal with its attendant consequence. Should you fail, neglect and refuse to comply with the command in this notice, the Department of State Services will be compelled to take far-reaching, sweeping, and across-the-board measures through our Organisation, whose mandate covers such criminal acts,” the letter warned.

    Reacting to the request by the DSS, Sowore’s lawyers, Tope Temokun Chambers, urged X to disregard it.

    In a post yesterday, Sowore said X officially contacted him about a letter from the DSS demanding the removal of his content.

    In a letter addressed to X, the law firm described the DSS request as “unlawful, unconstitutional, and without legal foundation”.

    Citing Section 39(1) of the 1999 Constitution, Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and several judicial precedents, the law firm noted that only a court of competent jurisdiction can restrict expression.

    Read Also: How Jindu Peter Elueze is bridging human, animal welfare from Chicago to Nigeria

    “The DSS is not a court of law and cannot arrogate such powers to itself,” the letter said.

    The law firm accused the Nigerian government of a “historical pattern of repression” against Sowore, referencing his repeated arrests, detentions, and ongoing trials since 2019.

    “This request is not an isolated incident but part of a pattern of harassment and censorship designed to silence a critic of the government,” the letter said.

    It noted that complying with the request of the DSS would make X “complicit in the violation of human rights obligations”.

    The lawyers urged X to ignore the directive of the DSS, saying any compliance would amount to “aiding and abetting state repression”.

    It added: “We must emphasize that Mr. Sowore is a U.S.-based permanent resident, which makes this issue one of not only Nigerian constitutional law but also of international concern. To comply with the DSS request would make X complicit in the violation of both Nigerian and international human rights standards.

    “In view of the above, we demand that X disregard the unlawful request of the DSS. Any compliance with this censorship attempt would amount to aiding and abetting state repression in violation of binding human rights obligations.

    “Our client reserves the right to seek redress before competent national and international fora should any action be taken that violates his rights.”

  • Activists slam Sowore for attacking Tinubu

    Activists slam Sowore for attacking Tinubu

    Some civil society organisations (CSOs), led by the Independent Public Service and Accountability Watch (IPSAW), have berated former presidential candidate of the African Alliance Congress (AAC) in the 2023 election, Omoyele Sowore, for attacking President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    A few days ago, the President addressed investors in Brazil, where he declared that his reforms and initiatives have left no room for corruption in Nigeria.

    But Sowore, on his verified Facebook account, debunked President Tinubu’s statements and called him a liar for declaring Nigeria corruption-free.

    Addressing reporters in Abuja, the Leader of the group, Taiwo Olugbenga Adeniran, denounced Sowore for using uncouth language against the President.

    Members of the group staged a protest to the headquarters of the Federal Ministry of Justice,  calling for the immediate arrest and incarceration of Sowore.

    Read Also: INEC chair tasks NIMC on unified citizenship database for Nigeria

    Speaking during the protest, Adeniran said: “In addressing a duly elected and legitimate President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, a liar, Sowore has crossed the red lines. This is beyond constructive criticism and opposition politics. This is madness and bitterness taken too far.

    “Of course, freedom of expression is sacred, but it is not a licence for lunacy. Our constitution protects speech, not sabotage. Omoyele Sowore’s actions are not activism but a deliberate assault on Nigeria’s soul. Branding our nation as hell abroad is not dissent; it is betrayal.

    “For someone who aspired to be the President of this country, Sowore doesn’t build Nigeria’s image; he defaces it. He is not aiming for a better Nigeria but an opportunity to settle scores with political rivals and mislead a few gullible Nigerians.