Tag: Omoyele Sowore

  • Sowore: Activist with penchant for self-glorification

    Sowore: Activist with penchant for self-glorification

    Sir: The Inspector General of Police (IGP) has shown strong leadership by promoting over 20,000 Inspectors to the rank of Assistant Superintendents of Police (ASP). This major promotion has earned him praise from many quarters, as it reflects genuine concern for the welfare and morale of police officers across the country.

    But, as usual, Omoyele Sowore is trying to take the credit for himself. He claims that the promotions were a result of his #IGPMustGo protest and other demonstrations he has led against the IGP.

    This is simply not true. Police promotions are guided by clear procedures based on merit, years of service, and institutional needs, not protests or social media noise. Giving credit to Sowore for these well-earned promotions is not only misleading but also an insult to the thousands of officers who have worked hard for this elevation, and to the police leadership that made it happen.

    Sowore has a habit of trying to make everything about himself. While protests can be useful in drawing attention to issues, twisting facts to stay in the spotlight is not activism, it’s deception. It misleads the public and stirs unnecessary controversy.

    Read Also: UK-based FCV Academy thrilled with talented Nigeria’s youngsters

    The recent promotions were not a reaction to any protest. They were the result of deliberate planning by the IGP and his management team to reward diligence, boost morale, and enhance operational efficiency in the Force. At a time when the country is facing serious security challenges, these kinds of proactive steps deserve commendation, not baseless attacks.

    Unfortunately, Sowore has made it his mission to unfairly target the IGP with constant abuse, even resorting to calling him unprintable names, all because the IGP remains in office lawfully. And I keep asking myself: where was Sowore when former president, Muhammadu Buhari allowed the then Chief of Army Staff, General Tukur Buratai, to remain in office long after reaching the statutory retirement age, without any constitutional backing?

    That’s why I take Sowore’s campaign of calumny against the current IGP with a pinch of salt—and I urge well-meaning Nigerians to do the same. We must not confuse senseless, irrational attacks on public officials with genuine activism.

    Criticism is welcome in a democracy. But it must be based on facts, not personal grudges or the hunger for relevance. It’s time we learned to separate attention-seeking from advocacy, and truth from noise.

    •Hassan Yahaya, Hassanyahaya@gmail.com

  • Police charge Sowore with calling Egbetokun ‘illegal IG’

    Police charge Sowore with calling Egbetokun ‘illegal IG’

    The police have filed a criminal charge against a former presidential candidate and activist, Omoyele Sowore, for describing Kayode Egbetokun as an “illegal” Inspector-General of Police (IGP).

    It was learnt that Sowore may be arraigned today before Justice Abdullah Liman of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Read Also: Police probing 179 suspects laundering of N11b, says spokesman

    The police detained the activist and Sahara Reporters publisher after he refused stringent bail conditions granted him while honouring their invitation in Abuja.

    Count One of the charges reads: “That you, Omoyele Sowore, on December 13, 2024, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, did intentionally and knowingly send messages through your verified X handle account, ‘Omoyele Sowore’, and caused a publication against the Inspector General of Police, where you called him ‘illegal IGP Kayode Egbetokun.”

    The police said he knew the statement to be false and intended “to cause a breakdown of law and order”.

  • Sowore to remain in Police detention over refusal to accept bail conditions

    Sowore to remain in Police detention over refusal to accept bail conditions

    Former presidential candidate and activist, Omoyele Sowore, was on Monday night detained by the police authorities in Abuja after refusing to accept bail conditions imposed on him after interrogation.

    Sowore announced on his verified Facebook page that the police were holding him in custody until further notice following his “refusal to accept their illegal bail condition”.

    The Nation learnt he is being detained at the Abattoir police station in Guzape, Abuja.

    He said: “It is a wrap! The Nigeria Police Force is holding me in custody until further notice, following my refusal to accept their illegal bail condition.”

    The police, on Monday, granted Sowore bail after interrogating him at the Force Intelligence Department (FID) complex in Abuja.

    But the activist described the bail conditions, including the provision of a level 17 civil servant as a surety and surrendering his passport to the police, as “illegal”.

    Sowore, on his Facebook page, said: “The interview revolved around Sowore’s comments on police officers in Lagos, who were operating an unauthorized checkpoint to extort motorists, thereby causing significant traffic congestion at the busy international airport road.

    Read Also: Funke Akindele, Wunmi Toriola make 2024 highest grossing lead actresses

    “Sowore admonished the officers, pointing out that their actions were causing traffic and urging them to cease their illegal activities. When instructed to park, seemingly to facilitate extortion, Sowore refused, requesting to speak with their supervisor, the Commissioner of Police in Lagos.

    “The police subsequently asked Sowore to leave. The incident was captured on camera, and Sowore uploaded the footage to his Facebook page and other social media handles. During today’s interview, the two police officers were unable to provide a basic response to Sowore’s initial question, which asked them to identify the location of the alleged crime in Lagos.

    “Further questioning was suspended, and Sowore was asked to prepare a written defense. However, Sowore chose not to provide a written statement and instead requested that his statement be electronically recorded and transcribed for his verification.

    “The police team conducting the interviews temporarily left and returned with their supervisor, Mr. Galandanchi, who stated that Sowore’s bail had been approved and that the conditions would be communicated by the interviewing officers. Sowore notified Galandanchi that he would not accept bail under conditions that jeopardized his innocence, integrity, and fundamental rights.

    “As anticipated, the police officers returned with typewritten conditions that stipulated Sowore surrender his international passport and provide a senior civil servant employed by the federal government at level 17; Sowore promptly declined these conditions and informed the police officers.

    “Several hours later, the police officers returned and stated that Mr. Galandanchi had reviewed the bail conditions, revising the requirement to a level 16 officer in the civil service, and asserted that Sowore’s lawyer, the prominent Nigerian human rights attorney Femi Falana SAN, had negotiated with them.

    “However, Mr. Falana shared a note he sent to Galandanchi, reminding him that courts have consistently ruled that requiring civil servants to serve as guarantors in police bail processes is unlawful.

    “At the end of the interrogation, Mr. Sowore was taken to a police detention center, specifically the “Abattoir” unit. The PoliceNG team assigned to my case has informed me that the DIG of FID, Dasuki Galandachi, has reevaluated my bail conditions, necessitating the production of a level 16 civil servant and the surrender of my international passport, a condition I have declined outright.

    “I refuse to participate in any arrangement that undermines my personal integrity.”

  • ​JUST IN: Sowore arrives Police HQ for interrogation

    ​JUST IN: Sowore arrives Police HQ for interrogation

    A former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) Omoyele Sowore has arrived the Force Headquarters in Abuja to honour a police invitation.

    Sowore arrived at the police headquarters around 9.45 am on Monday with his lawyer and some supporters.

    The Nigeria Police Force summoned Sowore for questioning last week.

    The invitation, dated January 23, 2025 was signed by CP Ibitoye Rufus Alajide on behalf of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Force Intelligence Department (FID).

    Read Also; How to unlock untapped potential in oil industry, by Tinubu

    The invitation letter reads: “This office is investigating case of resisting and obstructing public officers, disobedience to lawful order, acts intended to cause grievous harm or prevent arrest, compelling action by intimidation, reckless & negligent acts, refusal to assist public servant and cyberstalking in which your name featured, prominently,” the letter reads.

    According to the letter, Sowore was directed to report to Room 212 of the FID Complex, opposite Force Headquarters in Abuja by 10 a.m. 

    The letter emphasised that the invitation was within the police’s constitutional investigative powers and Sowore was informed of his right to bring legal representation.

  • Sowore arraigned on seven-count charge

    CONVENER of the #RevolutionNow protest Omoyele Sowore and a defendant, Olawale Adebayo Bakare (aka Mandate), were on Monday returned to the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS).

    A Federal High Court in Abuja ordered the remand after Monday’s proceedings and fixed Friday for the hearing of their bail application.

    The duo had been in the DSS custody since August 3 after Sowore’s arrest, prior to the day set for the protest in some cities across the land.

    Sowore and his co-defendant are charged with conspiracy in the suit marked: FHC/ ABJ/CR/235/2019, money laundering, cyber-stalking and allegation that the African Action Congress (AAC) candidate in the February 23 election insulted President Muhammadu Buhari.

    They are alleged to have committed the offence of conspiracy to commit treasonable felony, contrary to section 516 of the criminal Code Act Cap C38 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and punishable under the same section of the Act.

    The charge reads: “That you Omoyele Stephen Sowore , Male Adult of No 1 Mosafejo Street, Kiribo, Ese-Odo LGA, Ondo State, Olawale Adebayo Bakare  (aka Mandate) Male, Adult of Olaiya Arca, Oshogbo LGA Osun State and others at large, under the aegis of Coalition for Revolution (CORE), sometimes in August 2019 in Abuja, Lagos and other parts of Nigeria within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, did conspired amongst yourselves to stage a revolution campaign on 5th day of August 2019 tagged #RevolutionNow”  aimed at removing the President and Commander -in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria during his term of office otherwise known than by constitutional means.”

    The prosecution accused Sowore of committing “cyberstalking”, contrary to section 24 (1) (b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention) Act, 2015 and punishable under the same section of the Act.

    Sowore was alleged to have on April 2, at Lagos and Abuja, transferred by means of swift wire, the sum of $19, 975 from his United Bank of Africa Plc Account No. 3002246104 credited by City Bank, New York City, USA, into Sahara Reporters Media Foundations GTB Account No. 0424048298 with the aim of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the funds,

    It further alleged that he also transferred $16, 975 from the same UBA Account credited to him by LANDRUM of 7e 146 W 29 Streeet, New York, NY10001, USA, via City Bank Plc, the aim to conceal the illicit origin of the funds.

    It was learnt on Monday that the prosecution has lined-up six witnesses against the defendants, including bank officials from UBA and GTB.

    The DSS had, while applying for an order to remand Sowore, told the court that Sowore got foreign sponsorship to wage war against the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari.

    It tendered evidence to prove that Sowore held meetings with both the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu and members of the proscribed Islamic Movement of Nigeria, (IMN).

    The court’s decision to return Sowore and Bakare to the DSS custody followed the plea by their lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika (SAN) that the defendants preferred the DSS custody to either Suleja or Kuje prison.

    At the commencement of Monday’s proceedings, Sowore and Bakare declined to plead to the seven-count charge brought against them by the Federal Ministry of Justice on the grounds that the government was in breach of a subsisting order of the court for them to be released on bail.

    Objecting to the defendants’ arraignment, Olumide-Fusika urged the court not proceed with the arraignment because the DSS has kept Sowore in its custody since August 3 and prevented the defendants from consulting with their lawyer after the charges were filed.

    The defence lawyer, who frowned at the conduct of the DSS for allegedly refusing to obey court order, argued that “no body, no matter how mighty, is above the law.”

    Olumide-Fusika urged the court to protect its integrity by refusing to allow the arraignment, arguing that the state has continued to disobey the order made by the court on September 24, 2019 for the release of the defendants.

    He added that lawyers to the defendants were denied the opportunity to interact with their clients since the charge was served on them, and that the DSS ought to have obeyed the order of the court before approaching the court for any benefit.

    Olumide-Fusika said: “When we served them with forms 48 and 49, they went to the press to say they will petition against the Judge before the NJC. It is not appropriate to say we are talking to the press.

    “We were in their office. They did not tell us they will be arraigning the defendants in court today. We got to know of it on the pages of newspaper that they will be arraigned today.”

    In a counter-argument, prosecution’s lawyer Hassan Liman (SAN) urged the court to disregard the defence’s objection to the planned arraignment.

    Liman insisted that what was more important was that the defendants have been served with the charges and were present in court.

    He contended that the order, referred to by the defence lawyer, had lapsed since the defendants had been produced in court for arraignment.

    Liman said it was unfair for the defence lawyer to say he was not aware of the charge, which was served on the defendants.

    He urged the court to allow the defendants’ plead to the charge, adding that it would be a disservice to the administration of criminal justice to say that the defendants will not take their plea.

    Read Also: Sowore, Malami and the DSS/NJC angle

    Liman added: “The court of law is a very serious place of business and not where we play to the gallery and talking to the press.”

    In a ruling, Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu overruled the defence and ordered that the defendant’s pleas be taken in respect of the charge.

    Justice Ojukwu was of the view that there was nothing wrong for the defendants to plead to the charge.

    Following the ruling, the defendants pleaded not guilty to the counts relating to each of them in the charge.

    After the defendants’ arraignment, Olumide-Fusika (SAN) prayed the court to allow Sowore to be allowed to continue with the bail earlier granted him by Justice Taiwo Taiwo, on September 24 and for the second defendant to be allowed on a fresh bail, a request the judge rejected.

    Justice Ojukwu said since the bail earlier granted Sowore was not predicated on the charge now before her, a fresh bail should be prayed for, since the defendants have now been arraigned before the court.

    The judge said the defendants must also formally request for bail by filing formal written applications, but not to apply orally.

    Justice Ojukwu ordered the defendants   to file formal bail application, which should be served on the prosecution.

    The judge asked the defence lawyer to choose between Kuje and Suleja prisons, where his clients should be remanded pending the next hearing date.

    In response, Olumide-Fusika urged the court to allow the defendants to return to the custody of the DSS, a request the judge granted and adjourned until October 4, 2019 for the hearing of the bail application.

    While being led out of the courtroom, after the proceedings, Sowore, dressed in a shirt and a pair of trousers, tried to address a battery of reporters, who had   gathered and positioned their gadgets, including cameras and microphones, at the foyer of the fourth floor, directly opposite the entrance to the courtroom.

    He was, however, prevented by security men, who led him on. As he was being led out of the court room, Sorowe kept speaking, urging Nigerians to rise against bad governance.

    His supporters, who attended the court session, hailed him and condemned the way the government was treating their leader.

    The defendants were led straight into a security vehicle parked right by the foot of the entrance to the court building.

  • Detention while awaiting trial? – Freedom for Sowore and the tens of thousands detained in Nigerian prisons illegally

    I am writing this piece on Friday, September 27, 2019. It will appear in print and online on Sunday, September 29. There is a very slim chance that by that date, the government of President Buhari would have obeyed the order of an Abuja High Court granting bail to Omoyele Sowore while standing trial for, among other alleged offences, treasonable felony. Given the current administration’s poor record of obeying court orders pertaining to release on bail of its many “enemies”, this is highly unlikely. But it may happen. If it does, some of the things I shall be saying in this piece would have been overtaken by events. If, however, Sowore is still in forcible and illegal detention by the time that this piece is read in print and online, then much of my observations in the essay will, sadly, be validated by yet another act of deliberate and unwarranted rubbishing of the rule of law by the government.

    In this piece, I am joining my voice to the voices of people in Nigeria and abroad that have called for Sowore’s his immediate release. Furthermore, I call for all charges against him to be dropped by the government because his call for massive and prolonged demonstrations is protected by the Nigerian Constitution. Moreover, I declare that the call of Sowore and the organization known as #RevolutionNow for protests constitute an act of civil disobedience that not only is a valid and honorable part of the political history of this country but also a tradition that President Buhari himself has deployed in pursuit of both his political ambitions and his vision for the country’s development and progress. But if it is the case that the government will not drop the charges Sowore, I join others in demanding that he should be freed now and be given a manifestly fair and credible trial. Free Sowore now! His continued detention is unjust, unlawful and profoundly anti-democratic.

    Since both the detention of Sowore itself and the alleged offences for the detention have been widely reported – and protested – in Nigeria and abroad, it is useful for me to begin here with the things that I find particularly noteworthy in the still unfolding saga. For this, I ask the reader to please take note of the first part of the title of this piece: detention while awaiting trial. As I shall demonstrate in the course of my reflections in this piece, Sowore is only one of tens of thousands of Nigerians languishing in prison, in detention, while awaiting trial. Among all the profoundly unconstitutional and anti-democratic aspects of governance in our country, this is one of the worst. Thus, Omoyele Sowore’s case is only the currently most talked about and scandalous instance of this extremely anti-democratic pattern or, indeed, tradition. Permit me to make a short elaboration on this particular case before coming to the more general aspects, especially as this has been manifested in the past and present political career of President Buhari.

    Sowore has been in detention since early August. As a matter of fact, after his arrest, the order for his detention was granted by a court for 45 days while investigation of his alleged offences was being conducted, with the proviso that if the investigation was not yet concluded in 45 days, the government prosecutors in the case could ask for extension of the detention. But this week – about the 6th or the 7th week of Sowore’s detention – the prosecutors announced that all investigations into the alleged offenses had been concluded. Moreover, the prosecutors did not ask for Sowore’s detention to be extended – presumably because they have no legal basis to do so. Instead of this, they are saying something more chilling, more sinister, this being the declaration that some of the alleged offenses for which Sowore is being charged are capital offenses that carry the death penalty, an assertion that Sowore’s lawyers have stoutly contested. The implication of this is as clear as daylight: in the absence of any valid legal basis for the continuation of Sowore’s detention, any excuse, any concocted rationale must be found to perpetuate this Nigerian tradition of detention while awaiting trial that the current administration has taken to hitherto unprecedented levels.

    I must quickly correct the last sentence. There is nothing uniquely “Nigerian” about detention while awaiting trial. In many other countries, we do find the phenomenon of so massive an over-congestion of criminal cases in the courts that the judicial system has to either release accused persons before they can be tried or keep them detained for as long as it takes for their cases to be tried and brought to a conclusion. The peculiar “Nigerian” dimension of this phenomenon lies in two remarkable factors. These are, respectively, the sheer scale of the phenomenon in terms of the total population of Nigerian prisons and the effect that long stretches of autocratic military rule has had on human and constitutional rights violations in our judicial order under both military and elective governance. What does this mean in concrete terms?

    Well, with regard to the first factor, consider the estimate made by some scholars and experts that have studied the issue that sometimes, between 63 to 70% of the population of Nigerian prisons are persons awaiting trial, some of them spending months and years in excess of the stipulated penalties for the crimes for which they were charged! And with regard to the second factor, the refusal of government to obey explicit court orders granting bail for persons awaiting trial, such as we have it in the current case of Sowore, began with military autocracy. Indeed, the two greatest exemplars of tradition of disobeying court orders by elected Nigerian heads of state, Obasanjo and Buhari, had their “training” for this propensity during their tenures as military dictators. As a matter of fact, the single most pernicious military decree on this phenomenon – the dreaded Decree No 2 of 1984 – was promulgated by Buhari as military ruler. Infamously, the decree called for indefinite detention for any acts intended to cause embarrassment or disrepute to the government, regardless of whether the allegations are true or false!

    Wole Soyinka has stated, perceptively and clamantly, that the government’s kneejerk response to Sowore’s call for massive protests is indicative of the increasing paranoia of the Buhari administration. As if to give proof to this declaration of Soyinka, one of the alleged offenses for which Sowore is to be charged is insulting the President and seeking to foment disrespect and hatred of Buhari: echoes of Decree No 2 of 1984! There is a big unintended irony here because, as I stated at the beginning of this piece, Buhari as both a military person and a civilian citizen has been an avid, passionate user of the tactics and strategy of civil disobedience in pursuit of his ambitions and goals. As a matter of fact, of all the 13 executive heads of state we have had in Nigeria since independence in 1960, none has been more of a practitioner of civil (and uncivil) disobedience than Mohammadu Buhari! Permit me to briefly provide a fact-based illustration of this declaration.

    Fact: Of all the military coups carried out by executive heads of state in this county, only Buhari’s coup of December 1983 against the government of the late Shehu Shagari was against an elected government. All the other coups by executive heads of state were “soldier come; soldier go” coups against other military autocracies. The coup led by Major Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu was also against an elected civilian government, but as it only partially succeeded and neither Nzeogwu nor any of his fellow coup-makers became head of state, this is different from Buhari’s successful coup against Shagari. I neither condemn nor endorse Buhari’s coup against Shagari’s government. I am merely drawing attention to its uniqueness among all other military coups in Nigeria because of the element of paranoia that has been such a prominent feature of the rule of the President as both a military and civilian head of state.

    Fact: In 2015, close to the presidential elections of that year that he eventually won, Buhari made his infamous statement of militant, chiliastic civil disobedience in which he stated, inter alia, that the “dog and the baboon will be soaked in blood”. Even the diehard defenders of the President have found it difficult to explain and/or justify the taint of bloodshed as means or ends of resistance to rigging in that statement. But that is Buhari for you, at least before he acceded to rulership for the second time: forget the courts, forget election tribunals, forget appeals to the international community; there will be blood, there will be fire if the elections are rigged. Looking back now to the declaration and its context in 2015, I remember that nobody took this declaration by Buhari as an empty threat, least of all the government of Ex-President Goodluck Jonathan and his political party, the PDP. I think Jonathan was shaken by the declaration and shocked into inaction about it primarily because he thought that he could not be sure of the readiness of the security forces of the state under his control to overwhelm or even match the bloodiness promised in “the dog and the baboon will be soaked in blood” speech. For his part, Buhari, I think, sees every potential challenge to his rule in the shadow of that speech, especially if he deems such challenges or threats as potentially or actually popular.

    Think about this, compatriots. Sowore and #RevolutionNow, together with their supporters, are numbered in dozens and at most hundreds, not thousands and definitely not millions. But they could grow into millions and multiple of millions, given the state of affairs in the country, especially with the overwhelming majority of our peoples. This is the cause of the fear and the paranoia behind the government’s decision to keep Sowore locked up and deprived of his freedom – while he is awaiting trial. Incidentally, the great majority of those detained in Nigeria’s prisons while awaiting trial are poor and powerless Nigerians, the very class of people on behalf of whom Sowore and #RevolutionNow are struggling. This is the reason why in this piece I have linked the call for Sowore’s release from detention to the call also for the release of all persons in Nigerian jails awaiting trial in the law courts.

    Any Nigerian who is not rich, not influential and is without connections to those in power is a potential member of the hundreds of thousands of those in prison while awaiting trial. All it will take to join the ranks of these damned and wretched of the land is for a person to be arrested on a fateful day, rightfully or wrongfully, for a criminal offense. The elite, the educated, the famous and influential can also be forcibly thrown in this throng. All that is needed is for you, like Sowore, to insist that you and others will march and protest and demonstrate against the injustices in the land without asking or waiting for the permission of the state to do so in a tradition of moral and altruistic citizenship known all over the world as – civil disobedience. The continued detention of Sowore is intended to discourage, indeed to criminalize civil disobedience by making Sowore a warning to others who may inspired by him and the acts of #RevolutionNow. I do not think that in the long run the government will succeed in this calculation. But that is an issue that only time and history will tell. Right now, we must insist that Sowore must be freed immediately and be allowed to face his trial not as a detained prisoner.

    In the late Festus Iyayi’s collection of short stories titled Awaiting Court Martial, we find many tales evoking and protesting the harrowing emotional, spiritual and ethical landscapes in which not only those literally awaiting trials are in limbo but the whole nation as well. Fear and paranoia are everywhere, among the people and definitely in the innermost recesses of the government. In one story titled “When they came for Akika Lamidi”, the journalist for whom the security police have come in the middle of the night thinks at first that it is armed robbers knocking on his door and trying to beak it down. He soon finds that it is the secret police. And then he discovers that they are like armed robbers in their mercilessness, only a hundred times worse. They have come now for Sowore. They will not come for you but that is only if you give up your rights and obligations as a human being and a citizen.

    • Biodun Jeyifo         bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu         
  • FG to drag judge before NJC for granting Sowore bail

    There were indications last night that the federal government was contemplating reporting Justice Taiwo Taiwo, to the National Judicial Council (NJC) on account of his decision to grant bail to the convener of #RevolutionNow protest, Mr. Omoyele Sowore.

    Justice Taiwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja admitted Sowore to bail on Tuesday and dismissed the objection raised by the Department of State Security (DSS) to the bail.

    The Nation gathered last night that a shocked Nigerian security and intelligence community met on the matter yesterday and resolved to appeal the judgement.

    It also decided to petition the NJC on the issue.

    A top government source, who spoke to The Nation, on the condition of anonymity, said that anyone standing trial for treasonable felony is not entitled to bail.

    He said :”Sowore’s bail is likely to bring trouble for that judge. A report has been prepared to report him to NJC in view of the fact that, as far as this country, it is known that a person charged treasonable felony has no bail option.

    “So, the security and intelligence community in the country is shocked by the judgement.

    “And there is a consensus that the judgement should not only be appealed, but that the NJC should be petitioned about the conduct and abuse of power by the judge.”

    Sowore was arrested and kept in the custody of the DSS since 3rd of August, 2019, for allegedly calling for “revolution” through the group’s protest fixed for 5th of September 2019.

    Read Also: BREAKING: Court orders Sowore’s release

    Sowore on Thursday, commenced a contempt suit against the Director-General of the DSS,Yusuf Bichi, for allegedly disobeying the order granting him bail.

    On Wednesday his lawyers submitted his passport to a Deputy Chief Registrar of the court.

    Meanwhile Sowore remained in the custody of the Department of Security Service (SSS) last night, 72 hours after a Federal High Court granted him bail.

    His lawyers claimed yesterday that the DSS refused to comply with the court order even after his bail conditions had been met.

    It was gathered that a court bailiff bearing the documents confirming that the bail conditions had been met was not allowed into the DSS premises Abuja yesterday morning.

    He was asked to come back at 12 noon which he did.

    This time,the document was collected from him and Sowore’s lawyers at the gate,yet he was not released.

    Sowore is facing trial for treaons -related charges.

    Justice Taiwo Taiwo ordered the release the convener of #RevolutionNow protest on Tuesday on the condition that his lawyer , Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), will produce him for arraignment whenever he is required.

  • ‘Activist’s release victory for rule of law’

    SOCIO-ECONOMIC Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has applauded the ruling by Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja that the Convener of #RevolutionNow protest, Mr. Omoyele Sowore, be immediately released from the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS).

    The organisation described the ruling as “a victory for the rule of law, human rights and judicial independence”.

    In a statement by its Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said: “It’s a huge relief that Sowore will be freed and can finally return to his family and journalism work. He should never have been detained in the first place. The Nigerian authorities should now withdraw all the charges against him and allow freedom of expression and media freedom to flourish. It’s good for everyone.

    “The Nigerian authorities now have to fully comply with this ruling by immediately releasing Sowore. The decision is a timely reminder of Nigeria’s constitutional and international obligations to protect journalists, activists and Nigerians in general, and to put a stop to its current practice of restricting the civic space.

    “We hope this decision will make the Nigerian authorities and state governors stop and reflect on their crackdown on freedom of expression and media freedom, including online, and help to end other human rights violations of journalists and (other) citizens in general. Other journalists, like Agba Jalingo and Ekanem Ekpo, currently being detained, must be immediately and unconditionally released.

    “If a court found it possible to release Sowore, we are sure that all the circumstances were studied, and an objective decision was made.”

    Last Saturday, SERAP sent an open letter to the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Mr Abukabar Malami (SAN), urging him to use his position “to without delay enter a nolle prosequi (unwillingness to pursue) and discontinue the prosecution of Sowore, who is also the publisher of Sahara Reporters, and Olawale Bakare (aka Mandate) for apparently politically motivated charges of treason, fraud and ‘insulting President Muhammadu Buhari’”.

    Read Also: Sowore’s trial negates progressive ideal, says Sani

    SERAP added: “We urge you to use your role as a trustee of the public interest under Section 174 of the Nigerian Constitution of 1999 (as amended) to end several of similar trumped-up cases going on in several states.

    “Sowore’s case and several similar cases instigated/brought by state governors make a hideous mockery of Nigeria’s criminal justice systems, rule of law, freedom of expression and media freedom. These cases are persecution and not prosecution. As guardian of the public interest, you have a role to end this travesty now and to maintain the sanctity and integrity of Nigeria’s justice system.

    “These cases set a dangerous precedent for the misuse and subversion of the justice system, which may lead to the politicisation of the Judiciary. This will be bad for everyone -ordinary citizens, journalists and even the politicians in power – as they may themselves become targets of these repressive and abusive tactics when they are out of power/in opposition.”

  • SERAP faults charges against Sowore

    Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has sent an open letter to the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Mr Abukabar Malami (SAN), on the detention of Sahara Reporters publisher Omoyele Sowore.

    The organisation urged him “to without delay enter a nolle prosequi (the dismissal or termination of legal proceedings by the Attorney General) and discontinue the prosecution of Sowore and Olawale Bakare (aka Mandate) for apparently politically motivated charges of treason, fraud and ‘insulting President Muhammadu Buhari’”.

    Read Also: FG charges Sowore with money laundering, treasonable felony

    SERAP said: “We urge you to use your role as a trustee of the public interest under Section 174 of the Nigerian Constitution of 1999 (as amended) to end several of similar trumped-up cases going on in several states.”

    In the letter, dated September 21 and signed by SERAP’s Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare, the group said: “Sowore’s case and several similar cases instigated/brought by state governors make a hideous mockery of Nigeria’s criminal justice systems, rule of law, freedom of expression and media freedom.

    “These cases are persecution and not prosecution. As guardian of the public interest, you have a role to end this travesty now and to maintain the sanctity and integrity of Nigeria’s justice system.”

    Also, a group of activists, under the aegis of Peoples Alternative Front (PAF), has demanded the unconditional release of Sowore and Olawale Bakare from the Department of State Services (DSS) for alleged terrorism and treason.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Group demands unconditional release of Sowore, others

    A group, Peoples Alternative Front (PAF) has demanded the unconditional release of Omoyele Sowore and Olawale Bakare detained by the State Service (SSS) for alleged terrorism and treason.

    They described as unfounded, allegations of terrorism, treason and money laundering against Sowore insisting he was arrested for insulting President Muhammadu Buhari.

    A statement released on Sunday by PAF secretary Alloysius Eze said Sowore had been detained for almost two months contrary to the 45-day granted by a Federal High Court, and the DSS was yet to substantiate its allegations against him.

    “After detaining Mr. Sowore for almost two months the SSS found no evidence to substantiate the reckless allegations. Instead of releasing him from illegal custody Mr. Sowore has now been charged with insulting President Buhari by criticizing him at Arise Television interview and treasonable felony by planning to stage protests against unpopular government policies on August 5, 2019.

    “Mr. Sowore has also been charged with money laundering for transferring the sum of $19,975 (N7.2m) from his personal bank account to Sahara Reporters, an online medium published by him!

    Read Also: Release Sowore now, Ondo Monarch tells Buhari

    “With respect to Mr. Olawale Bakare (aka Mandate) he was arrested in Osogbo, Osun State during the revolution protest on August 5. Other comrades arrested with him have been charged with unlawful assembly at the Magistrate Court, Osogbo, Osun State by the Nigeria Police Force.

    “All efforts to contact Mandate since then have proved abortive as the SSS had denied detaining him. Mandate who has been held incommunicado contrary to Section 2 of the Anti-Torture Act, 2017, has now been charged with treasonable felony along with Mr. Sowore.

    “Since it has been established that both patriots have been detained for several weeks for terrorism without any legal basis we hereby demand for their unconditional release from the illegal custody of the SSS.

    “We also call on the Inspector General of Police to release Messrs Agba Jalingo and Ekanem Ekpo being detained in police custody for terrorism for insulting Gov. Ben Ayade of Cross River State by publishing allegations of official corruption in Cross River State.

    “We agree with Mr. Femi Falana (SAN) that there can be no legal or moral basis for harassing patriotic citizens by the Buhari regime which is currently negotiating with terrorists and bandits, bribing them with public funds and granting them amnesty for arson and looting, gang raping women, kidnapping and killing innocent people.”