Tag: Political

  • Nigerian political lexicon: Reaching new heights

    Most English words and expressions endure for ages.  Only a few exist for specific climes and regimes.  The standard Oxford English Dictionary and other venerable publications give authenticity and meanings to words and expressions employed in books and used in daily communications.  Nigeria, being an extension of the English language sovereignty has by and large been part of this language heritage.  That is until recently, especially since 1960 when the country assumed political independence.  We have by our ingenuity created vast new political expressions which by their usage convey different meanings.  This literary stride has since gained ground making the Nigerian politician one of the most creative of our time.  Some familiar ones are mentioned here.

    “Well  gentlemen, my government  has an empty mind towards this conference”:   This was Nigeria’s Foreign Minister Jaja Nwachukwu who was attending a Disarmament Conference in Geneva, Switzerland, shortly after Nigeria’s independence.  Europe and the New World were divided into two spheres of influence – the West headed by the U.S and the East by the USSR.  Nigeria, the newest and biggest of the third world countries was invited as ‘observer’ to the conference.  It was an act of humor, but in those days most of the advanced world recognized and loved the gentle and soft diplomacy of Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa.  What our ubiquitous foreign minister wanted to say was ‘open mind’ not “empty mind”!

    “The come comes to become”:  This is from our respected Dr. K.O. Mbadiwe.  A colossal in his time, the politician was a words-worth whose mastery of the English Language especially when lambasting opponents in a formal debate was legendary.  He has been missed badly in the political space.

    Sit tight ministers: This was in early years of independence when parties and especially leaders who lost confidence of their leaders and were expected to step down refused to do so.  Early examples were A.C. Nwapa, S.L. Akintola etc.

    Akintola takuThis was the screening headline of the Daily Times when Chief S.L. Akintola refused to quit office as Premier of the Western Region even though he had lost the confidence of the party leadership and the governor could remove him.

    Wet e. Following the flagrant manipulation and rigging of the 1964 – 1965 elections in the West, voters went on a rampage, destroying and burning  human beings and houses.  It was a sorry picture throughout Western Nigeria where life was no more sacred.

    ‘Next level’ ordinarily means moving to higher space, but now it is almost exclusively used to connote advancement not into space but in progress.

    Moving Nigeria forward’ does not connote physical movement from one location to another, but attaining some national progress.

    “Inconclusive” now has no other meaning except it is tied to an election which is not completed or which does not throw up a winner.

    ‘Padding’: I bought a used Benz car in 2004, the most outstanding feature which made it more expensive than the others was that it was ‘padded’.  This involved adding a thick white metal to both sides of the car.  Today in Nigeria, cars are no more padded, but budget proposals sent    to the Nigeria Assembly are padded by chieftains of the hallowed chamber.

    ‘Sharing’ ordinarily means dividing some tangible objects between or among people.  Today in Nigeria, sharing connotes taking money from the national till and dividing it among rogue politicians or Civil Service mandarins.

    True federalism:  In Nigeria the term relates to those pundits who believe their part of the geographical space will benefit more if the country is constituted into units that allow them to control their national resources.  It does not denote equity, fairness and necessity, but an arrangement that will serve personal or group interest better.

    Restructuring’ is closely related to the above as regards its objective and perceived gains.  It is a political arrangement that would confer benefits on some people.

    Resource Control:  The advocates of resources control have in mind an arrangement where they will control all their natural endowments especially mineral resources, crude oil etc.  It is a self-serving political postulate.

    Ethnic nationality:  This is a euphemism for tribes or clans.  It is an attempt by political modernists to promote, enhance and modernize the term ‘tribe’ which the colonialists used to describe ‘natives’.

    Distinguished Senator: It is the warm affectionate acclamation which members of Nigeria’s upper legislature ascribe to themselves.  It does not matter whether the new member is just about to be sworn in, on entering the hallowed chamber he becomes distinguished.  In the ordinary world, the level of your performances in the job determines whether you are distinguished or not.  Not in Nigeria.

    Oversight functions:  This is an assignment which members of our legislative houses ascribe to themselves.  For it they share luxury cars, fat allowances and generous gifts from targets.

    Constituency projects: Ordinarily preparation of budgets especially items that will be included into the annual estimates is a job for the executive, but our smart and very considerate lawmakers usually include their own for their constituents.

    Recession/depression: This is a worldwide economic situation when growth is stagnated and when the national currency is fighting a lost battle with accepted standard currency of other nations.  In Nigeria it means more.  The palm oil tapper, the gari seller, the vegetable grown around the farm house all have their market prices doubled because of recession, or simply because of the ‘scarcity of dollar’.

    Militant/terrorist:  Hoodlums who kill at will in Nigeria are called militants, not terrorists.  When does a militant graduate into a terrorist?  Perhaps when a whole community has been decimated.  In ordinary language, a militant is not necessarily a terrorist, he can be an activist, fighting or demonstrating for a course.  But a terrorist is a dangerous killer and destroyer.  In Nigeria, the two are not separated.

    Hit the ground running:  This expression became almost a household word during the last election.  It means that the new administration when it is inaugurated would move to establish itself and pursue its programme almost on inauguration day.  No such magic has been observed/even 24 months after inauguration.

    He was the best President Nigerian never had: This was the most dramatic statement made by the legendary Emeka Odumegwu -Ojukwu while paying homage to late Obafemi Awolowo. Throughout history, this expression will be crafted in ageless marble as it represents the totality of the history of Awolowo.  Abraham Lincoln, J.F. Kennedy, Winston Churchill could not have put it better.

    The Nigeria politician is very innovative as he responds to new political situation with appropriate catch-words, slogans and descriptions.

    • Chief Fasuan MON, JP, writes from Ado-Ekiti.
  • ‘Why Igbo political leaders are moving  to APC’

    ‘Why Igbo political leaders are moving to APC’

     Chief Ndukwe Iko was a governorship aspirant and House of Representatives candidate of the  Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA) in Abia State in 2015; an Engineer, businessman and a politician, he is the CEO/MD of Task International Technical Ltd., an engineering company. He speaks on why prominent Igbo politicians are moving over to APC and why Igbo votes may swing to APC in 2019. Oziegbe Okoeki met him

    To many PPA is Orji Uzo Kalu and he is PPA, but recently Kalu defected to APC, so what is happening to the party now if the founder of the party has defected to another party?

    Yes, PPA was actually founded by Orji when he was governor of Abia State. He was actually a PDP person at the point of forming PPA; he was not a member of PPA at that point. PPA was a creation of necessity, the party was established to create a political platform for Orji’s political godsons at that time who eventually emerged the governor of the state in the person of former governor T.A. Orji of Abia State and Ikedi Ohakim of Imo State. So, PPA was founded as a child of necessity to actualise the ambition of these individuals to govern their states, even Senator Uche Chukwumerije went to the senate on the platform of PPA. So, PPA has always been even when Orji was not with them. Orji himself has been moving out and coming back to PPA if he could not find a platform to run his elections. This is not the first time he is moving and I wouldn’t be surprised in future if he comes back to PPA. Right now, Orji has a very urgent necessity to be at the center to play national politics and that is why he made the choice to go to the forefront of Nigerian politics by aligning himself with the APC. And also he has said it recently that he is swayed by the performance of the President when it comes to the aspirations of the Igbos in trying to fix our infrastructural requirement in that zone. Like he said, the President is doing so very well; everything he promised him to do for the Igbos, he is on tract doing them and that is what swayed his allegiance to APC to go help him and do more for the Igbos. I think that is more important at this stage. He wants to work at the center and push forward the cause of the Igbos.

    What do you make of this ease of movement by our politicians from one party to the other; do you agree that our parties lack ideological grounding, which is why politicians move with ease across parties?

    Politically speaking we can’t start in a day and get to our destination. It is wrong to compare Nigeria with advanced democracies like Britain or US because we have not been able to do two decades of unbroken democracy since after independence in 1960 whereas the democracy of these countries have been on for more than 200years. Yes, we could say we are learning from them but the learning process should be given a chance. Political parties at this stage of our national development should have a common ideology with little differences until our democracy is deeply entrenched and that will take time before you see clear ideological differences. I think that is what informs the movement of people from one party to the other at the moment. People are still getting used to the system politically speaking, people are still trying to figure out the best form of ideology that will suit a particular people to move the country forward and until we get to that stage the movement will continue and it takes time. I think if you give our democracy 50years from now, I think political parties will be entrenched in a given ideology and people will work with them according to those beliefs.

    During the 2015 election, APC had a poor showing in the South-East, but recently, we observe the movement of prominent Igbo politicians to the APC with a serving governor from that region saying APC would take over Anambra State in 2019; what is responsible for these movements?

    I believe strongly that the allure of people working with the powers at the center is still very strong in Nigeria. Every state is struggling to get the best attention and interest of the man at the center and that struggle is highlighted strongly in the last 16years when the PDP as a party was at the center of affairs in Abuja. If you are a PDP governor, it appears it was quite easier for you to have the ears of the president. So that notion has continued to drive politicians at the state level to think that if you align yourself to a party with the government at the center that you will get more of the ears of the president and I am sure you can’t agree less. And that is why, given the deprivation in the South-East, the Igbos are now realising that it won’t augur well with us as a people to play the opposition from the center; it has always been better for us to align with the party at the center. This has been the trend since the First Republic. In this republic, the Igbos have remained very inactive at the center, the best being the Deputy Senate President. So, the Igbos are now realising the necessity for us to go back to the center and play our usual role of being at least number two. Coming from number two in the Second Republic to number four now is not progressive for us. It is just important that we go back to the center.

    South-East is a PDP zone, do you think these movements can sway votes to the APC in the zone in the next election?

    You see one of the major reasons why Jonathan lost the last election was the unseriousness of the evaluation of the impact of the South-East vote. If Jonathan had garnered up to 3million votes in addition to what he had, I think it would have been more difficult for President Buhari to emerge but they played with levity and it cost them dearly; you can imagine Jonathan garnering just 300,000 votes in a South-East state with almost one million votes; it happened like that in almost all the five South-East states, so if you look at the votes lost you know you should take Igbo more seriously in the next election, if those votes should count. I believe if the South-East vote is galvanised properly, it can make the difference; that is why any serious party must seriously harness the voting strength of the South-East. So, if APC continues in the stride they have taken recently and maximise the voting resources in the South-East, then Igbo man’s vote would make the difference in 2019. And I think that is the agenda and that is why we have people like Orji Uzo Kalu coming over to get that mission accomplished.

    Yes, the political leaders have their agenda but the ordinary Igbo man needs to be convinced why they must vote for APC in 2019. Is the APC central government doing anything in Igbo land now that will sway the ordinary man’s vote for APC?

    I have not actually gone round but according to media report and the little I have seen, I believe the APC government at the center is doing something seriously to uplift the bad/failed federal roads in the South-East, which has always been our cry since 1999, and which was one of the reasons Kalu fell out then with Obasanjo. But going by recent developments on the roads, the Igbos will not feel neglected again and then add it to the Second Niger Bridge that the present administration will complete before 2019; I think the rest will be history when it comes for Igbo support for APC in 2019.

  • Resolving Gambia’s political impasse

    SIR: The current political impasse in The Gambia is a by product of a democracy-driven political contestation that has gone sour. It was a struggle for power and authority to control the highest office in the land, the presidency. The election in question actually produced a winner in the person of opposition leader, Adama Borrow, who defeated the incumbent, Yahya Jammeh, who is a legend of a sort now in the comity of long-serving African leaders or heads of state.

    The good news, until recently, was that the outgoing president, the defeated “father” of the nation, congratulated the in-coming president immediately after the election. However, when the opposition shouted on their rooftops that, the outgoing elder statesman and president will be comprehensively probed, the papa of the nation smelt a rat, revisited the done election, saw some holes, and shouted back – I will no longer accept the election as a free and fair one. The election must be nullified and a new one must be conducted. So The Gambia landed itself in a deep, still brewing political impasse that may explode the nation.

    All known and well-respected individuals including presidents of all the nations and multinational and multilateral organizations have denounced the volte-face of the out-going president. Some have threatened fire and brimstone. Surely, a war is in our hands. And what do we do as peace lovers and advocates?

    Number one fact is that the in-coming crop of leaders made a mortal mistake. The mistake is this; they began to eat their cakes ever before the cakes are given to them. Why announce to the whole world that the outgoing president will rot in jail? This is an error, The Gambia like most countries in Africa is a near failed state in transition, therefore, an incumbent should be settled/pampered/paid like brutal warlords with comparative advantage, to leave the stage.

    As a solution, the outgoing president, Yahya Jammeh, should be allowed immunity against all probes and prosecution as long as he lives. Former president of Ghana, J. J. Rawlings still enjoys a similar legal cover.

    War, cannot be an option in The Gambia. Let us avoid it. We cannot afford to take actions that would result in loss of innocent lives of ordinary poor Gambians. International terrorists with weapons of mass destruction, drug gangs and other war entrepreneurs such as the “developed” countries’ defence industries, will cash-in on the situation in The Gambia if we let it degenerate into a war.  The result will be a long war that may consume all of us. Therefore, let us together ease the big masquerade with all fanfare out of the village square.

    • Charles, Alfred (PhD)

    Federal University Wukari, Taraba State.

  • Time to rework our political, economic foundations, says Tinubu

    Time to rework our political, economic foundations, says Tinubu

    National Leader of the All Progressives Congress, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has described the 56th independence anniversary of the nation as an opportunity to reflect on ways to rework and strengthen the nation’s political, social and economic foundations.

    In a statement issued by his media office in Lagos yesterday, Tinubu urged Nigerians to support the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari, describing the current economic situation in the country as a necessary rite of passage for any nation desirous of greatness.

    He said although the nation is not yet where it ought to be at this point in her life, it has witnessed appreciable progress in her 56 years of independence.

    The statement reads in part: “Nigeria’s political, social and economic foundations need to be reworked and strengthened.

    “Our institutions are not functional enough to deliver on the goals for which they were set up.

    “This independence anniversary therefore offers us another opportunity at reflections.

    “But beyond that, it demands from us all the sacrifice needed for nation-building and re-commitment to the vision of our nationalists who saw the greatness in this country and worked to advance it.

    “The times are tough, no doubt. The reasons are not far-fetched.

    “However, the journey to recovery has begun in earnest and I enjoin you all to support the President Muhammadu Buhari-led administration in this journey.

    “I ask you all to embark and stay on this journey with us so that we can build up our institutions and our country and indeed our lives again.

    “I congratulate all Nigerians and welcome you all to a new and great possibility.”

     

  • Omorede Osifo in political wilderness

    Omorede Osifo in political wilderness

    While the Edo State governorship elections beckoned and the big players jostled to make contributions to ensure that their parties carried the day, one name that was conspicuously missing was that of Omorede Osifo. The celebrity woman’s political clout has been waning since she was booted out of office by the state’s governor, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, about two years ago.

    It will be recalled that Lady Omorede wielded considerable political influence while she held sway as the Edo State Commissioner for Youths, Sports and Social Mobilisation, until she was kicked out by the governor who was angered by the failure of the floodlights at the Samuel Ogbemudia Stadium during a key function.

    Since the death knell sounded on her political rapport with the former president of the NLC, Lady Omorede has cut down on her participation in top level politics in the state.

    Although she remains a staunch member of the APC, she is no longer the influential force she used to be.

    These days, the beautiful woman is focusing more on her personal life.

  • Political stability in Africa and Middle East

    Recently, US Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump said he admires Saddam Husain the late president of Iraq who was judicially lynched by the successor Shiite government of Iraq during the American occupation of the country. People were aghast at his comment. He also said he sees no reason for America to be an eternal enemy of Russia and that even if the USA does not like Russia, it should cooperate with Russia to defeat ISIL (Islamic state of Iraq and the Levant) and that the USA fought along with the brutal dictator Joseph Stalin during the Second World War to defeat the axis powers of Japan and Germany. One may disagree violently with Trump on almost everything but in this particular instances cited, I can see some sense in his usual madness.  I am convinced that the likes of Saddam Husain maintained some kind of peace in the Middle East in spite of the brutality of his regime. Even though he came from the minority Sunni population and treated all opposition Shiite or Sunni with brutality, he ensured that there was peace which was what the generally apolitical ordinary people of Iraq wanted. The mistake people in the West made was wanting to graft democracy on a traditionally autocratic conservative Arab environment.

    When people in the West were hailing the so called Arab Spring, I had the sneaky feeling that things will not turn out well. This was when I listened to the ambassador of Syria to the UN sometime in 2010 at the plenary of the UN General Assembly pleading for understanding of his country’s problem. He had argued that Syria was a delicately balanced country of Alawites, (Shiite) Sunnis, Christians, Kurds, Armenians and Aramaics and that backing Sunnis who want to overthrow the Bashar -al-Asad regime would bring all sorts of external forces and complications which will not augur well for the future of Syria and the Middle East. After more than a decade of warfare and a whole country with an old civilization destroyed, there has neither been democracy nor peace in Syria; rather a murderous group calling itself a caliphate has emerged bridging the frontiers of Iraq and Syria and imposing its draconian rule and will on a helpless and hapless people leading to the largest migration of a destabilizing horde of people since the end of the Second World War. But for the tenacity of the Sharifian dynasty in Morocco and the FLN government led by the old and infirm Abdelaziz Bouteflika in Algeria who were able to resist the forces of the dissidents particularly FIS (Front Islamique de Salut), the so-called Arab Spring would have engulfed the whole of the Maghreb. The situation in Libya was unfortunately not the same for several reasons. NATO wanted Muamar al Ghadafi to be removed from power because of what was considered as his dangerous ambitions in the past especially wanting to develop nuclear and chemical weapons on the other side of the Mediterranean which Europe considers a European lake. Even though he had given up the ambition, he was never trusted. So when the occasion for his removal presented itself, NATO was not going to allow it to slip from its hand. Their forces instigated a local rebellion which it joined to murder without trial an incumbent head of state. But what has replaced the years of stability in Libya is chaos and the take-over of part of the country by forces pledging allegiance to the Caliphate. The situation in Libya is like the case of Humpty Dumpty and everybody is waiting for which forces will secure the vast country of Libya. Whatever anybody may say about Ghadafi, he secured the country for decades after the overthrow of King Idris -al-Sannusi . Egypt is back in the hands of the military after the initial hoopla of getting rid of President Mubarak. He was replaced by Mohammad Morsi for about a year before he was overthrown by General Muhammad -al-Sisi. It appears that the Egyptians would rather have stability than some wooly democracy or chaotic rule by the Islamic brotherhood of Morsi. The effendiyyah in Egypt is just too sophisticated for that. It is only in Tunisia where the Arab Spring has brought in some form of constitutional regime albeit under an 82 year old president! Yemen is in turmoil and the Saudi army is there fighting a proxy war with Iran that is backing the Houthis who are Shiites. Oman and the other Gulf States including Saudi Arabia are maintaining some precarious peace with their Shiite subjects cowed down by overwhelming Sunni forces. Iran continues to pose existential challenge to the gulf Arab states and even far afield to Sunni domination or threatened domination in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq. Egypt which could have provided Sunni counterweight to Iran is held down by a collapsed economy and terrorist challenge in the Sinai. The chaos in North Africa and Middle East has reverberation in Africa where the Al Qaida in the Maghreb and West Africa, Boko haram in Nigeria, Niger and the Cameroon and al Shabbab in Somalia and Kenya constitute variants of the same Middle East Islamic terrorism. The direct effect of this is the proliferation of weapons of precision that are fuelling insurgency all over Africa.

    One common denominator to the Middle East and Africa is their sit-tight presidents in Museveni’s Uganda, Mugabe’s Zimbabwe, Bashar’s Sudan   Paul Kagame’s Rwanda and other dictators in the inter-lacustrine state of Burundi as well as virtually all the Francophone states of the two Congos , Central African Republic and the Spanish  speaking Equatorial Guinea. Even the new state of Southern Sudan is torn by ethnic war because of the sit-tight syndrome. While this goes on, there is neither growth nor development of the economy. On top of this is the rising population of young people who have no hope of employment. Even countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Ethiopia and Tanzania to mention a few are also afflicted by unimpressive economic performance and joblessness of their ballooning youthful population. This a time bomb in both Africa and the Middle East. The situation is so bad that young people are ready to die crossing to Europe by leaky dinghies and boats across the Mediterranean Sea.

    What is to be done? It seems to me that Africa has largely accepted that the democratic way is the way forward. There may be debate about what style of democracy. It is obvious that the western model may have to be modified to suit the peculiar condition of each African state.  This is not the same as supporting any bastardized democratic contraption called home grown democracy which is a euphemism for dictatorship. The market-driven economic prescriptions of the West may not work because of paucity of foreign and local investors. The state would have to intervene through direct investment by state corporations side by side with private investors like it happened in South Korea. The enforced orthodoxy of market economy will have to give way to practical solution that would also generate employment for the teeming masses of the people.

    But as for the Middle East and North Africa, democracy may not work there for long time to come. The Middle East will only survive if a way is found to satisfy its young people who are suffering from unemployment. This problem would worsen with the decline in the price of gas and oil which will make it impossible for the gulf countries to continue to bribe young people with generous perks because sooner or later they will run out of cash. The future of the almost 350million Arabs is uncertain unless realistic solution is found to the economic and political conditions of those countries. There will also have to be reconciliation between Iran and the Arab states as well as between Sunni and Shiite sectarian traditions in Islam. Finally the question of war and peace with Israel must be resolved by accepting the existence of two states, Israel and Palestine, in old Palestine. Inability to solve this problem may drive Arab youth to extremist tendencies which would not augur well for peace in the Middle East an absence of which could pose a threat to global peace.

  • Sheriff considers political solution to PDP crisis 

    Sheriff considers political solution to PDP crisis 

    After visiting ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo and some former Heads of State,  Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) factional chair  Ali Modu Sheriff and his loyalists are weighing options on political solution to the crisis.

    About six governors of the party were also said to have shifted to Sheriff’s camp and coordinating efforts to find a political solution.

    It was learnt that Sheriff, his factional National Working Committee (NWC), some ex-governors and other key supporters may meet today in Abuja to take stock of the situation.

    It was learnt that all those consulted by Sheriff advised him to consider a political solution to save the opposition from collapse.

    Although three former Heads of State agreed that Sheriff had cogent reasons for sticking to a legal option, they asked him to “sacrifice for the survival of the nation’s democracy.”

    It was learnt that Sheriff felt bad about the alleged plot by Governors Nyesom Wike and Ayodele Fayose to humiliate out of office.

    A source, who spoke in confidence, said: “Despite the fact that we may have legal advantage, Sheriff’s camp is weighing options on political solution to the lingering PDP crisis.

    “All consultations and representations made to our camp so far have pointed to political solution because the PDP crisis is becoming a national security threat.

    “In fact, weekend’s session between ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo and Sheriff focused more on the security implications of a viable opposition going under. Obasanjo was more concerned about the lawlessness the nation might be plunged into without a strong opposition.

    “Some of those who have pleaded with Sheriff believe that there is a political vacuum in the country which PDP is not filling.”

    The source added: “Sheriff will on Monday (today) meet with his loyalists and NWC members to take stock and decide on the way forward. The truth is that if it is about judicial option, Sheriff has an edge but he cannot ignore all those who have advised him.

    “There is likely to be a meeting point soon between the Sheriff Group and Sen. Ahmed Maikarfi Caretaker Committee in order to keep the party united.

    “At the end of the day, the two factions might go for an out-of-court settlement to move the party forward. With the way things are going, most of the cases at hand may remain in court till 2019 going by the slow pace of justice.”

    It was learnt that the six governors who have teamed up with Sheriff were said to have parted ways with Wike and Fayose, allegedly influenced the choice of Abuja for the next National Convention of the PDP.

    Another source added: “These six governors have realized that Wike and Fayose are much more fixated on the 2019 agenda than the survival of PDP. They have shifted base to Sheriff and they are coordinating efforts to resolve the challenges facing the party.

    Ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo on Saturday said PDP was already in coma and needed intensive care.

  • At the gate of political hell, godfather’s last gamble

    At the gate of political hell, godfather’s last gamble

    Ordinarily, the choice before Edo voters on September 10 should not pose a burden heavier than the simple ceremony of sieving the grain from the chaff. The contention is between APC and PDP.

    But given the ongoing legal cockfight in PDP resulting in its iconic umbrella being literally torn in the court of law between Markafi and Sheriff, it is safe to assume that a fatal preliminary own goal is already scored against the Edo branch of the once “biggest party in Africa”.

    Barely a week to the election, no one is able to answer with confidence yet a very simple question: PDP’s votes on the D-Day is for Markafi’s Osagie Ize-Iyamu or Sheriff’s Mathew Iduoriyekemwen?

    If the foregoing observation is legal, the second test is material. From 1999, PDP ruled the acclaimed “heartbeat of the nation” for 114 months, while APC has administered it for 94 months so far.

    However, looking back, whereas the majority of Edo people will ascribe to APC under Comrade Adams Oshiomhole plaudits for improving the human condition appreciably with a surfeit of monuments across the state as further proofs, PDP’s testimonial is hideously scanty besides the cultivation of a small oligarchy whose hierarchs have either successfully completed jail term for colossal looting or are today luxuriating in obscene wealth amassed solely through the grace of Tuketuke politics.

    Based on these verifiable facts, it will not be out of place to submit therefore that PDP is already too morally fractured, facially disfigured to stand a chance in the coming election. But drawing the curtains on the debate there so summarily would rob distant observers the opportunity to fully understand the shape and nature of the real forces now at play, ferociously angling for Edo’s political soul. It is actually a titanic battle between defenders of a movement that boasts of delivering something to the society regardless of its own imperfections and the barons of a discredited past plotting a return to power.

    The historic challenge before the intelligentsia today therefore is to help bring some illumination that the people can make informed choice in the leadership recruitment process. For clarity, yours sincerely does not only hail from that section of the country but also privileged to have served as a commissioner in Edo until one’s resignation last November. During the period, one gained sufficient insight as well as had one-on-one interactions with the key players across the divides.

    So, as a writer, one is not shy to admit one has a professional interest, and as a native a civic responsibility to share one’s perspective for Edo’s advancement.

    True, no one will say incumbent Adams Oshiomhole is perfect. All known angels will be found in heaven. To me, whatever personal inadequacies the Comrade Governor may have pale into insignificance considering the weight and value of his contributions in the past eight years. Really, it is impossible to change society without making some enemies. The tale of transformed physical landscape under his watch is now all too familiar to warrant a recap here.

    This leads us to the next question: so who is better equipped among the gladiators on the field to extend the frontiers? From all the candidates have said, shown or promised in the last three months of campaigns, I make bold to say Godwin Obaseki represents the best hope for Edo tomorrow. For the four years I spent in government in Edo, I happened to have interacted closely with him.

    To be sure, he is not as gifted as Oshiomhole in terms of oratory. He is decidedly a man of short speech whose few words however carry deep intellection and almost evangelical zeal to follow through ideas from conception, incubation, implementation to evaluation in an otherwise treacherous environment where most people view tasks only from the naira and kobo that comes back to their pockets.

    In these economically perilous times, Edo surely needs a conscientious steward who can think and act on his feet to chart a new course, irrevocably committed to working for the poor and not the coven of famished godfathers feverishly seeking to regain a paradise already lost.

    Such sterling qualities are however in acute deficit in PDP, the bastion of Tuketuke politics. For non-speakers of Bini, Tuketute is a generic name for any vehicle on the verge of falling apart, but still commercially exploited by the owner by being forced on the road.

    Tuketuke therefore describes rent-seeking politics where the provincial godfather continues to milk a dysfunctional order in self-aggrandizement at the people’s expense. People famish for the godfather to flourish.

    To sustain the hero-worship of the godfather, Tuketuke politics abhors men of ideas or intelligence or other evidence of demonstrable independence of the mind. In the new world otherwise driven by big ideas, the only skills required in Tuketuke politics are not more than rigging, seamlessly sharing bribes and bottles of Schnapps gin on election’s eve and maybe suborning of the most pathetic species of the media running dogs, eager to plant articles praising the godfather in the newspapers but too ashamed to affix their real names on such panegyric.

    Only the Tuketuke magic could have explained the transmogrification overnight of Chief Tony Anenih. Between 1993 and 1998, it is public knowledge he had fallen on hard times, only surviving on crumbs from the table of Chief Tom Ikimi (who was quite influential during the Abacha junta), and maybe the little return from his “short time” hotel Nova in Uromi. But after just a short career as PDP’s “Mr. Fix It”, Anenih had become so stupendously rich he could by 2014 now afford to lend hundreds of millions to sitting President Goodluck Jonathan! (At least, that is his claim in a statement to EFCC earlier this year when asked to account for his N260m share from Dasuki’s $15b loot).

    It is in this dim light that Anenih’s desperation to have PDP restored to power in Edo today should be situated. Having had his political oxygen mask abruptly demobilized in Abuja, he now seeks rehabilitation at home. As for the other PDP campaigner, Ikimi, parables have been made about an old Chevrolet jalopy, which guzzles 10 litres of gas for a mere kilometer. That Tuketuke contraption is obviously in dire need of affiliation to a big depot for sustenance.

    At corporate level, the Tuketuke spirit is what also manifests in PDP’s continued obsession with building new industries as key campaign promise (as if the chain of phony industries Igbinedion claimed he built ever functioned for a single day)!

    In the market-driven economy of the 21th century, you allow the private sector to take the driver’s seat. On account of its structure and orientation, government no longer has business running businesses. Rather, its remit is to create the enabling environment – like durable social infrastructure and formulate coherent policies – to help businesses grow.

    One can therefore relate with Obaseki’s promise to create 200,000 fresh jobs. The bouquet of durable social infrastructure – including more than 1,000 kilometers of roads – delivered by Oshiomhole in the past eight years already offers a solid foundation to build on. Vast opportunities surely abound in the agriculture sector where the state has comparative advantage. The big mechanized farms will accelerate urbanization of our rural communities, particularly in Edo South, thereby helping to curb rural-urban drift.

    Requiring sustenance is the land reforms started by Oshiomhole which has removed swathes of land from the control of old political godfathers who only use same to secure personal bank loans or sublet to tenants. Genuine agro entrepreneurs who benefit will certainly deliver more jobs.

    Only last Monday, Pat Utomi, the renowned professor of Political Economy, flagged off a $136m farm project located in at Ugbokun Community in Ovia North East in Edo. This will deliver thousands of fresh jobs. It is perhaps instructive that Utomi hails from neighbouring Delta State. In choosing Edo to locate such gigantic industry, the discerning intellectual must have noted Edo’s comparative advantage.

    Apart from Utomi’s Integrated Produce City, there are no fewer than a dozen other mega agro-allied companies including the $750m farm promoted by Idahosa Okunbo that have either taken off or nearing completion stage under an investment-friendly climate Oshiomhole has created in the last eight years. Really, these are the terms Edo’s economy of the future should be discussed, not fantasizing over the new “sharing formula” likely to be approved by the godfather for the state’s next monthly allocation from Abuja as suggested by the incoherent economic agenda so far touted by PDP – high on utopian promises but short on how-to.

    Under PDP’s suzerainty in the past, the state’s land stock was only parlayed into primitive feudal racketeering. In the twilight of Lucky Igbinedion’s administration in 2007, more than 120,000 hectares, representing more than 70 percent of Edo’s reserved land stock, was released and not less than half of that allocated to Esama directly or shell companies linked to the family alone under the guise of utilizing same for agro-allied enterprises. The “His Excellency, sir, chief, doctor of Okadaland” simply added his loot to the stock already sub-let to Yoruba farmers who, in turn, would pay him royalties running into hundreds of million yearly!

    The culture of predation perfected by PDP also explains why whereas state-owned TV/radio station, the EBS, withered during PDP’s reign, Igbinedion’s ITV prospered. And while state-owned Ambrose Ali University floundered, Igbinedion University in Okada flowered.

    On discovering the land scam in 2012, an angry Oshiomhole issued an executive order revoking the allocation. The imperial Esama has not forgiven the governor ever since.

    Well, the aforementioned illustrations are provided today to assist Edo people connect the dots and realize where the rain began to beat them. The desperation to refoist PDP on the state is actually a disingenuous design to restore the old thieving Tuketuke order.

    How ironic that PDP is now whining about the desirability of “a level-playing field” come September 10. But when it had the fabled “federal might” in 2012, it wielded it without the fear of God or man. When Anenih still had his finger on the trigger, raw power and awesome financial war-chest were crudely deployed. State institutions were openly induced and compromised. One of the few exemplars was Major General Obi Umahi, the then Commander of the Fourth Brigade, Benin City.

    A thoroughly professional soldier with steely Christian values (said to carry a small Bible around in his pocket), Umahi (elder brother to the present Ebonyi governor) consistently refused mouth-watering bribes and choking pressures from the PDP godfather already assured by the “Niger Delta militants” they would invade Edo and help orchestrate violence, thereby creating enabling climate for the election results to be fixed, but only on the guaranty that the military would “cooperate”.

    The brave officer threw the final bombshell at the jointsecurity council meeting held on the eve of the July 14, 2012 polls when the time came for him to speak at the gathering attended by heads of all the security and paramilitary agencies: “I’ve told my soldiers to shoot to kill anyone who tries to do anything funny or rig the election!”

    Of course, it is easily recalled today that the exemplary patriotic conduct of officers and men of the Nigerian Army made the difference on the D-Day as all the thugs and mercenaries imported into Edo to enforce the rigging plot chose to keep a safe distance as the battle-ready soldiers kept vigil across the state. Oshiomhole won his reelection by an unprecedented 75 percent.

    Expectedly, Major General Umahi eventually paid a huge price for his principle. In a matter of weeks, he was redeployed from Benin to an obscure post in Lagos through intrigues believed to have been masterminded by the politically wounded Anenih. A kangaroo panel raised by then clearly partisan leadership of the Army to probe Umahi on trumped up charges soon recommended his summary retirement. But apparently pricked by conscience, then Chief of Army Staff, General Azubuike Ihejirika, curiously chose to foot-drag on the implementation. But once Major-General Kenneth Minimah, the favourite of PDP wheeler-dealers, took over, Umahi’s retirement was one of his earliest actions. The rest, as they, is now history.

    Indeed, statecraft remains a work-in-progress. Wherever Oshiomhole may have failed in the past 94 months, I am sure Obaseki has the wisdom, the depth, the range and, most fundamentally, the integrity to make amends if voted.

    So, at the dawn of September 10, the Edo voter should appreciate the enormity of the historic rite ahead. Voting Obaseki is the covenant. It is not a favour to anyone, but the duty of every Edo freeborn to secure a better Edo tomorrow for our children.

     

    Enter Chief Zebrudiah Okorocha alias 3.0

    VIEWERS – particularly the older generations – missing The New Masquerade (what an oxymoron!) should find consolation in the comic turn of events in Imo State today. The nostalgia would most likely be for the lead actor of the old television comedy series, Chief Zebrudiah Okoroigwe alias 4.30. For instance, awarded the coveted national honour “MON”, he would later tease that “EY” was not added to fetch him “MONEY”.

    Overwhelmed by the challenge of governance today, Governor Rochas Okorocha would seem to have resorted to trying on the costume of the old comic, obviously to divert public attention and stave possible civil revolt at being swindled by a political conman.

    When the other day questions were raised over Okorocha’s absence from his duty post Owerri for weeks, the government spokesman rose stoutly to the occasion. With a straight face, he lectured that his boss only travelled abroad to – what else – “attract foreign investment”. But the stark truth finally emerged last week when the new Zebrudiah of Imo landed Owerri airport. Apparently unaware of the lie his publicist had told on his behalf, Okorocha said: “I went to the land of the dead and our ancestors turned me back, saying it was not yet time.” Thus confirming the earlier speculation that he was stretchered out of the country in a grave condition. So, people are now left wondering when “foreign investors” became a synonym of “our ancestors”.

    Earlier, Okorocha had blissfully advertised his poor political education by announcing the formation of the “fourth tier of government” to bring governance much closer to the people. He boasted the idea would catapult rural folks into the boardroom of power. But other than the champagne bottles later popped that night at the Government House in toast of his “wizardry” and “sagacity” for such ground-breaking innovation, nothing else has been seen. The truth: it is only the fulmination of a confused mind.

    The same brainwave apparently led the Zebrudiah of Owerri into his latest brew, which, for ease of reference, we can roughly term “Formula 3.0”. In spite of the billions of naira that the state received from Abuja in bailout funds, civil servants are still owed arrears of salaries. Of course, prioritizing contractors’ pay is far more lucrative to the approving authority for obvious reasons.

    But not to worry, the governor of comedy in Imo soon announced that state workers are now to work for three days and spend the remaining two working days on their own personal farms or in pursuit of anything “to keep body and soul together”. With that, he must have expected to be garlanded as the most ingeniously considerate governor in history.

    But the long-suffering state branch of the Nigeria Labour Congress are not amused and have, in fact, responded by staging yet another march against the governor. The same away the Federal Government – though not exactly known for any profundity of thought either – observed the proposal must be the next worst voodoo visited on Imo after the Otokoto saga of the 90s.

    Without shame or remorse, Okorocha brought more comedy to the debate few days ago by shedding light on the rationale behind his proposal: “Instead of being devoted to the work they (civil servants) are paid for, they use their official hours to loiter about; they sell groundnut, gala, chin-chin and sieve egusi (melon seed chaff), among others in the office. I decided to reduce the working days because I want to enhance agriculture in the state.”

    But myopic Okorocha is unable to appreciate the original idea behind the civil service. Really, in these lean times, the real challenge is how to optimize manpower to create wealth to augment government earnings. If workers were found to be idle, shouldn’t the duty of a wise manager be to reassign them where their energies are better utilized to enhance productivity?

    Myopic Okorocha will not know he invariably shortchanges the state further by suggesting workers would continue to earn full pay for less work. Only a small mind thinks that way.

    Without conscience still, Okorocha took his pontification to another level few days ago by advising President Buhari to declare “state of economic emergency” to revive the economy from the present coma: “We have to declare a state of economic emergency right now in Nigeria and all hands must be on deck… For some us and I think for all Nigerians who travel out, we know that we need to stand up and avoid sentiment and face the issue.”

    Sharp words indeed. But if there is indeed anything to say of the globe-trotting hypocrite of Owerri, it should begin with an admission that elsewhere public accountability would have forbidden him from lying that he travelled abroad to seek investors when in reality he was bedridden at taxpayer’s expense.

    Before asking Buhari to declare emergency in Abuja, one would have thought Okorocha would set a good example by proclaiming one in Imo already overtaken by filth, buffoonery and tales of graft. For instance, before he took over in 2011, Owerri was rated by the Federal Ministry of Environment as the cleanest city in Nigeria on account on an aggressive green advocacy and urban-renewal initiative. But that is now history as the new Zebrudiah literally turns every thing up side down.

    Once upon a time, Imo was a shining beacon in the education industry. Not any more. Nothing perhaps emblematizes the story of a worsening crisis than a statement by JAMB recently that no fresh students would be admitted into Imo State University (IMSU) for the next academic year. Reason: those offered admission for the 2015/2016 are still languishing at the gate since the institution has been under lock and key for several months due to a protracted industrial action that has brought to bold relief Okorocha’s poor managerial skill. Sadly, just as workers wait on Okorocha’s for the arrears of back pay, admission into IMSU will certainly now be conducted in arrears in future!

    All told, what baffles is the air of indifference Okorocha continues to exude at home over these serial derelictions and the shamelessness he exhibits outside. When he arrived Owerri in 2011, he said he came on a rescue mission. But it is obvious the rescuer himself is now urgently in need of a rescue. Meanwhile, the performance of the new Zebrudiah continues. As I heard they say openly in Owerri these days, this Okorocha comedy “has no part II”.

  • Nigeria’s political arrangement requires urgent reform

    SIR: The foundation of Nigeria’s problems is its obsolete political-economic system that sustains rent-seeking and nurtures corruption. The beneficiaries of this system have chosen to turn a blind eye to the folly of maintaining a tragically flawed system, choosing as it were to postpone the evil day. The chickens are already coming home to roost as exemplified by our current economic fortunes.

    This unitary system which was bequeathed to us by our erstwhile military dictators was crafted specifically for the purpose of weakening the then regional governments and the maintenance of a command and control structure in the aftermath of the Nigerian civil war. This system of governance was never intended to deliver the dividends of democracy to us, simply because it was NOT designed for that purpose.

    There are those who have in defence of our ex-dictators suggested that the motivation for the creation of this system was to ensure the unity of Nigeria and extinguish separatist fires. A noble objective at the time, yes, but today’s Nigeria faces an entirely different set of challenges and they require an entirely different set of solutions.

    Today, Nigeria is burdened with a mono-product economy that has given birth to a biting economic recession. It is also burdened with the practice of a political system that is destroying social cohesion and eroding our fragile national unity.

    To remedy the situation we today find ourselves in, we must begin by accepting the failure of the 1999 constitution. The 1999 Constitution ensures that states remain appendages of the federal government, in direct contradiction with the most basic tenets of political and fiscal federalism, which envisages that states/regions are to be free, economically self-sustaining, whilst contributing to the maintenance of the government at the centre.

    One of the primary causes of this aberration is captured by Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) which provides thus:

    (1) The Federation shall maintain a “special account” to be called “the Federation Account”

    (2) The President…shall table before the National Assembly “proposals” for revenue allocation from the “Federation Account”, and in determining ‘the formula’, the National Assembly shall take into account, “the Allocation Principles”…

    (3) Any amount standing to the credit of the “Federation Account” SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED…”on such terms and in such manner” as may be prescribed by the National Assembly.

    The foregoing sections of the Constitution effectively rendered Nigeria’s erstwhile productive regions (now states) into dependants and ultimately stifled the economic development of Nigeria.

    It may be said also that the 1999 Constitution is also the cause of the poor leadership that Nigeria has been burdened with particularly at the state level, with politicians simply aspiring to get elected into office in the knowledge that no mental input or industry is required of them vis a vis the economic development of their states, because frankly speaking there is no incentive to think or to work, when there is free “oil-money” to be “distributed”, by Law.

    The politicians would rather focus their energies on “legacy projects” and grand schemes to attract a larger cut of the corruptly termed “national cake”. Hence, Nigeria may never achieve its famed great potential, IF it persists in practising an obsolete  political-economic system that stifles economic growth and political maturity.

    To correct this aberration, the government is humbly advised to see to the amendment of the 1999 Constitution along the lines of the recommendations of the 2014 National Conference Report.

    Whilst appreciative of the fact that not all the recommendations contained in the report may be perfect, its progressive and nationalistic thrust, leaves no one in doubt, and in its pages, we find an excellent template for the reconstruction of our national political-economic architecture for the attainment of growth and development, under terms that are JUST and agreeable to ALL Nigerians.

     

    • Ugochukwu Amasike,

    Lagos State.

  • Between mind restructuring and political restructuring 

    Between mind restructuring and political restructuring 

    The debate on restructuring is not abating and new thoughts are introduced into the factory of ideas on a regular basis. The latest is from Governor Ganduje of Kano State, who has urged us to bother more about mind restructuring and less about geopolitical restructuring. Presumably once we restructure the minds of Nigerians, either geopolitical restructuring will be added unto it or it would not be necessary after all. To drive home his point, the governor referred us to the United States as a model of diversity without concern for geopolitical restructuring.

    I am sure that Governor Ganduje means well for the country. According to media report, the ultimate goal for which he recommended mind restructuring instead of geopolitical restructuring is “to return the country to the path of progress.” This is also the desired goal of those who believe that absent political restructuring and true federalism, including devolution of power to component entities, the country will not experience the desired progress. Here then we have a conflict of views on the path to progress.

    I commend Dr. Ganduje for offering an alternative perspective towards the same end point, one that is substantive in its recommendation of mind restructuring. There are several issues to raise about the governor’s recommendation of mind restructuring as a substitute for geopolitical restructuring. But before we take on that task, there is a more urgent task.

    In support of his position, Governor Ganduje offered the example of the United States, which “is more geopolitically fragmented with more nationalities than Nigeria” and is the “strongest nation in the world.” Presumably then, diversity is not a liability. If this was the point of Ganduje’s reference to the United States in the context, I do not think he has any opponent, certainly not from advocates of political restructuring of Nigeria. They too see our diversity as our strength, provided it is well managed. By this they mean a truly federal structure, which we do not have now. Hence, the demand for political restructuring for the country to realise the potential strength of our diversity as does the United States.

    But Governor Ganduje meant something else and this is where the facts may not be on his side with respect to the political structure of the United States. The governor argued that “the United States attained its present status because of the ability of its leaders to harness the positive thoughts and actions of its heterogeneous population, and not by the restructuring of the country along geopolitical divides.” That is, it is not the political structure of the United States that helped its development into the most powerful nation on earth. Rather, it is the ability of its leaders to harness the mind and body of citizens that made the difference.

    One philosophical challenge to this position is that it creates a false dichotomy where none is warranted. Certainly if the structure wasn’t right to start with, the mind of the population cannot be harnessed effectively for the task of development. In the case of the United States, we are in a good position to determine which played the leading role in its progress over the years. It is the political structure which was settled early on in the intense debates before its constitution was ratified.

    The debate over the merits of federalism and confederalism engaged the convention delegates for long before they finally settled on federalism with the Bill of Rights enacted as compromise to protect the liberty of citizens. State rights were recognised. Limits were placed on federal government powers, and state and federal governments had dual spheres of authority. Each state has its constitution, state anthem, state symbols and other paraphernalia of governance. States control the minerals under their soil and on the basis of the revenue that accrues to them from taxation on the extraction of such minerals by private companies, some states, such as Texas, choose not to charge their residents state tax. This is how heterogeneity works and diversity benefits the entire country.

    Now, since the structure had been given adequate thought from the beginning and it works, there is no need for restructuring. If it aint broke, don’t fix it! We also opted for federalism in Nigeria at the beginning. But along the way, the country ailed, and in our effort to put it right, we applied the wrong remedy. The military chose to fix the challenge of leadership with a change of structure. It is this wrong move that needs correcting.

    Dr. Ganduje observed that the United States is “more geopolitically fragmented with more nationalities than Nigeria.” To a large extent this is true, but it is also misleading. It is true to the extent that every nation of the world has an imprint in the United States and it has become a nation of nations. But it is misleading because residents and citizens of the United States do not have the sense of place or the sense of origin that many Nigerians are encouraged to have.

    No one asks a United States citizen his or her state of origin when applying for a job or scholarship. Rather the question is always state of residence. That is not the Nigerian experience. Therefore, for Nigerian citizens, place of birth is a barge of identity no matter how long they have resided in another town, city, or state. So, whereas the United States has more sub-nationalities than Nigeria, this sub-national identity means less for a typical American than it does for a typical Nigerian. Americans freely move about states without loss of identity.

    Furthermore, the fact that the United States has a federal system that prioritises the autonomy of states on many governance issues is the most brilliant device which has fuelled its progress. The governor of a state in the United States is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of his or her state. The governor is in charge of the security of the state. The governor appoints the Police Chief who hires his or her team.

    The governor determines the size of civil service the state needs and, based on the size of its economy, the state determines how much it can pay to its workers. The federal government has nothing to do with these state issues. Surely, there are tensions in the relationship and there are times when the United States federal government attempts to overreach and the states resist with law suits. There are also times when states try to play fast ones with regulations that affect their minority populations especially in matters of voting rights. In such cases, the federal government, especially one that is headed by a progressive president, may seek to intervene to make things right, usually by going to the courts.

    The effectiveness of the United States system of federalism is made possible because the states in the federation are viable entities on their own, and the residents of these states and especially the voting population challenge their governments to be effective. They have nothing to complain about if they are not as effective as they are expected to be. They are to manage their bureaucracies and their economies for the benefit of their population. Therefore, as CEOs, governors have to roll up their sleeves and remain competitive to attract investors and make their states business friendly.

    Viability of states makes the difference. In Nigeria, on the other hand, many states are no more than glorified municipal counties. The point of political restructuring is to correct this imbalance. It doesn’t make sense that states just exist on paper with little to discharge their responsibilities without the intervention of the federal government through financial bail-out. Geopolitical restructuring is the prerequisite for the viability of the constituent entities of the federation.

    Mind restructuring, by which Dr. Ganduje means the development of the mind and the harnessing of the positive thoughts of the population, is not an alternative to geopolitical restructuring. They are complementary, and there is reason to believe that if the structure is not right, the development of the mind will suffer. The evidence is too obvious to ignore.