Tag: PRESIDENCY

  • Automatic Senatorial tickets: Presidency under pressure to review list

    Automatic Senatorial tickets: Presidency under pressure to review list

    Barely four days after automatic second term deal was reached with Senators, the Presidency and the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are under pressure from governors and leaders of the party to review the list.

    Also, the PDP governors, who have rejected the pact, will meet with the President anytime this week.

    But a source in the presidency said the President and the National Chairman of PDP, Adamu Mu’azu, only made political concession to the Senators but not an electoral commitment.

    After a three-hour meeting on Thursday night, President Goodluck Jonathan and the leadership of the PDP conceded automatic tickets to 40 Senators to return to the Red Chamber.

    Some of those who may return are Senate President David Mark, Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu; Ahmed Makarfi, Nenadi Esther Usman, Smart Adeyemi, Atai Idoko-Ali, Barnabas Gemade, Barth Nnaji, Pius Akinyelure, Boluwaji Kunlere, Philip Aduda, Enyinnaya Abaribe, and Uche Chukwumerije.

    The list includes the Senate Leader, Victor Ndoma-Egba, Bassey Otu, Benedict Ayade, Zainab Kure, Simeon Ajibola, Adeseun Ayoade Ademola, Agboola Hosea Ayoola, Emmanuel Bwacha, Umar Abubakar Tutari and Suleiman Adokwe.

    But following pressure, the Presidency is singing discordant tunes.

    One of the top aides in the Presidency claimed that the President deliberately said he believes a “reasonable percentage” of the Senators should be returned.

    The source said: “Since the outcome of the talks at the Villa filtered out, there had been pressure on the Presidency and leaders of the party. Everyone wanted to know the nitty-gritty of the agreement. But it was really not a sealed deal at all.

    “The party may still tinker with the list of those the Senate wanted back in 2015. You know by the Electoral Act, there are variables to consider before fielding a candidate for any elective post.

    “If a Senator is lazy or unproductive or unpopular in his or her Senatorial District, how do you foist him or her on the people?

    “At least, Thursday session laid a foundation for the need to return some Senators to the Upper Chamber to enrich the 8th National Assembly.

    Another source said the President and Muazu only made political concession and not an electoral commitment to the Senators who came to the Villa.

    It was learnt that PDP governors may meet with the President again this week on the pact with the Senators.

    A governor, who spoke in confidence, said: “We have also decided to seek audience with the President on the real picture of the pact with the Senators.

    “We are directly in touch with the grassroots and local dynamics. We know what people want and how the party can win in 2015. Abuja cannot determine winning formula at the state level.

    “We are giving the President the benefit of doubt on this pact. We want to hear from him. I know between Sunday and Tuesday, we will have audience with the President.”

  • FG unprepared for insurgency – Presidency

    FG unprepared for insurgency – Presidency

    The Federal Government was totally unprepared for the insurgency that has ravaged the northern part of Nigeria, the Presidency has said.

    Speaking at the public forum on the impact of Jonathan’s administration on Tuesday in Abuja, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Public Affairs, Dr. Doyin Okupe, said those that were bent on rating the present government based on the worsening insurgency in Nigeria were wrong.

    He said: “Somebody wants us to believe that the only testimony of performance of this administration is insecurity, (but) that’s not true. This government was totally unprepared for the insurgency.

    “Nobody planned for insurgency. And yet insurgency is a serious problem on its own to contain. America with all their power and resources were in Iraq for up to about five or six years with over 400,000 soldiers put on ground and yet see Iraq the way it is today.”

    He noted that it was a national misfortune that the Chibok girls were still held captive by the terrorists, and stressed that the cease fire agreement between the federal government and Boko Haram was at the instance of the sect.

    “Yes a cease fire was announced and it was at the instance of the insurgents. What the President has demonstrated today is that he said that all options are on the table. So when the insurgents call for talk, how can anybody blame the government for that? If it doesn’t work out, that is not the fault of the government. That is actually the nature of the insurgents. Because they are factionalized, their line of command is not clearly defined.

    “So this government’s capability and performance cannot solely be represented on the outcome of the insurgency in Nigeria. There is agriculture, education, infrastructure, health, social development and many other component parts,” he said.

    Okupe further argued that Nigeria had three tiers of government and Nigerians should start demanding for the dividends of democracy from their respective state and local governments.

    “There are three tiers of government – federal, state and local. The federal government only takes 48.5 per cent of the total revenue for the country. The other 48.5 per cent is taken by the states and all the local governments put together.

    “But everybody puts their eyes on only that of the federal government and that is wrong. It is right to put their eyes on the federal government, but it is wrong to put their eyes only on the federal government because the share of the money for development and administration is equal. And out of the federal government’s share, about 15 per cent goes to foreign affairs and military, which the states do not bear at all,” he added.

     

     

     

  • Presidency threatens Amaechi

    Presidency threatens Amaechi

    The Presidency yesterday threatened  Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi with legal action over his comments on President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration.

    Speaking during the 7th anniversary of his Supreme Court victory in Port Harcourt, the state capital on Saturday, Amaechi, among other accusations, claimed that corruption under Jonathan has reached an industrial scale.

    But, in a statement issued yesterday, the President’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Dr. Reuben Abati, maintained that the claims were false and baseless.

    The statement accused Amaechi of making “totally false and baseless vituperations against President Jonathan, the First Lady and the Federal Government”.

    It described allegations as “completely unfounded and off-the-mark” and alleged “demagoguery, libel, blackmail and incitement of public disorder”.

    The Presidency maintained that Amaechi was using falsehood to incite the people against his perceived political enemies.

    The statement said: “We can only assume therefore that he is deliberately spewing malicious falsehood in a desperate effort to incite the people of Rivers State and Nigeria against his assumed political foes.

    “We warn him that there are legal, constitutional and moral limits to political rascality beyond which he will not be allowed to go without repercussions.

    “The immunity which he currently enjoys notwithstanding, Governor Amaechi should be under no illusions:  A day of reckoning will surely come when he will answer for all his actions and false allegations against President Jonathan, the First Lady and the Federal Government.”

    Continuing, the statement reads: “He should also know that Nigerians are aware of the truth and will never be fooled or swayed by his arrant opportunism and anti-Jonathan rantings.

    “Nigerians know that while Mr. Amaechi falsely accuses others of corruption, he cannot show or explain to the people of Rivers State what he has done with the billions of Naira that has accrued to the state under his tenure.”

    It went on:  “Nigerians will know too that while he falsely alleges that Rivers and other states have not received funds due to them from the Federation account, the only outstanding allocation was for September, which was released to all states well over a week ago.

    “The governor should stop trying to make President Jonathan the scapegoat for his woeful performance in Rivers State and look to his own very apparent failings and incompetencies.

    “He should also stop blackmailing the First Lady who has demanded nothing from him other than good governance, justice, equity, fairness, real development and progress in Rivers State.”

    Also yesterday, First Lady Patience Jonathan denied asking for money from the Rivers State governor.

    Amaechi had, while speaking in Port Harcourt at the joint graduation of the students of University of Ibadan and pioneer graduates of Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, at the weekend, was quoted as saying that his problem with Mrs. Jonathan started after he rejected her demand.

    “I refused to give them money in Abuja because if I did that, I won’t be able to carry out any development project or finish the road from Rumuolumeni to Rumuepirikom.

    “The quarrel between me and the wife of the President is because she said I should bring your money, Rivers people’s money and share with her,” the governor reportedly said.

    But Mrs. Jonathan, in a statement by her media assistant, Mr. Ayo Adewuyi, said the statement was a deliberate attempt to malign her.

    The statement read: “Having waited patiently for Governor Amaechi to refute the statement credited to him about the First Lady, (with the assumption that he was misquoted), it has become clear that it was a deliberate attempt to malign Dame Patience Jonathan and score cheap political point.

    ”The governor may have been beclouded by the political uncertainty surrounding him to make such a jaundiced and unsubstantiated allegation that the First Lady asked him to bring Rivers State money to share.

    “This is a blatant lie designed to denigrate the person of Dame Patience Jonathan and undermine the Presidency. This is to say the least most unfortunate.

    “It is crystal clear that Governor Amaechi is looking for cheap excuse for his failure in the governance of the state. We say without any iota of equivocation that the First Lady never made such a request and could not have done so in any way either directly and indirectly.”

  • Jonathan’s confused presidency

    SIR: President Goodluck Jonathan administration is a labyrinth of confusion. Nigerians’ aspiration that he would someday put himself in the right column of history has been dashed, once more. He ought to be the fate of Nigeria and the fate could not be sustained. Now, a thousand years will pass and the guilt of his government will not be erased.

    By his ceasefire deal with the Boko Haram, President Jonathan has practically exaggerated the malevolent power of Boko Haram in an effort to legitimise his bankrupt rule. Pitifully, he has openly disembowelled his government by his disdain for the armed forces for which he is a commander-in-chief.

    In 2011, a Presidential Committee on Security Challenges in the North-East Zone, set up after bomb attacks by the Islamic sect, submitted its final report, asking President Jonathan to consider granting amnesty to members of the sect wishing to surrender their arms to the federal government. The panel, headed by Ambassador Usman Gaji Galtimari, recommended that the federal government consider the option of dialogue and negotiation which should be contingent upon the renunciation of all forms of violence and surrender of arms, to be followed by rehabilitation. In November 2012, the sect said it was willing to cease all hostilities and attacks if the federal government would arrest a former Borno State governor, Alli Modu Sheriff and meet its other demands.

    Sheriff has since become a PDP financier.

    On January 7, 2013, the insurgents for the second time restated its commitment to ceasefire in order to pave the way for dialogue. One Sheikh Abu Mohammad Abdulazeez Ibn Idris, who claimed to be a top member of the major faction of the group led by Sheikh Abubakar Shekau, spoke on behalf of the group.

    In April 2013, the Federal Government set up another committee to consider the feasibility or otherwise of granting pardon to the sect and to collate clamours arising from different interest groups who wanted the presidency to administer clemency on members of the barbaric group.

    The president followed this up in May with a promise to release a number of Boko Haram members, including all women in prison custody. In July, Nigerians happily looked forward to the end of the insurgency when the federal government said it had signed a ceasefire agreement with the militant group. Minister of Special Duties and Chairman of the Peace and Dialogue Committee in the North, Alhaji Tanimu Turaki, announced the ceasefire agreement on the Hausa service of Radio France International.

    Since then, there has been no cessation of hostility.

    In May this year, Minister of Youth Development, Boni Haruna, told the country that President Jonathan had granted conditional amnesty to the terrorists group with a view to putting permanent halt to insurgency in the North-east. He added that series of integration programmes had been lined up for the members of the sect who would surrender their arms and embrace peace. Shortly after he made the statement, the Presidency debunked the statement. Special Adviser to the  President on Media and Publicity, Dr. Reuben Abati, said the President did not mention the word amnesty in his Democracy Day broadcast that Boni Haruna relied on to make the statement.

    Is it really difficult to put the Boko Haram rabble to rout? Is it just that the Jonathan

    administration is profiting politically from the insurgency? That is why the purported ceasefire reached between the militia sect and the Federal Government is comical.

    You can now understand why Nigerians have been hankering for a strongman; a leader who would stamp out insecurity, corruption, reverse growing inequalities and make the country tall in the comity of nations. A president with common touch and toughness who can snare the sacred cows that have fed fat from the common till.

    • Erasmus Ikhide,

  • Presidency: no plan to  elongate Jonathan’s tenure

    Presidency: no plan to elongate Jonathan’s tenure

    The Presidency denied yesterday some online reports alleging that President Goodluck Jonathan was plotting to elongate his tenure by two years.

    Addressing State House correspondents, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Public Affairs Dr. Doyin Okupe said the report was false.

    The presidential aide said the report was a calculated attempt to embarrass Dr Jonathan.

    He said: “We have read the news as published in Sahara Reporters that the President is trying to elongate his tenure through means other than democratic means and that he is trying to use the excuse of the insurgency in the Northeast as the basis for doing so.

    “This type of falsehood is quite characteristic and is the hallmark of Sahara Reporters in particular. But still, in order that the world and Nigerians in particular are not misled, I want to state categorically here that there is no truth whatsoever in that report. It is not true. There is nothing like that on the board. This is not the President who will do a thing like that.

    “There is no reason for this President to do that. This is the same President, as you must have recently heard, over 12 million Nigerians have put their signatures to papers that he should come out and run.

    “All the agencies and levels and stakeholders, authority in his party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), have endorsed him and they are actually asking him to come out and make a declaration and run.

    “It is quite a logical thing to do because there is no reason why anybody should be thinking of changing a winning team.

    “The issue also is that ever as it is everywhere in the world. Endorsement itself is not undemocratic. It is the normal pattern in democratic parlance that when you have a sitting President and he is interested in a re-run, usually, he is given the choice of first refusal.

    “The President is yet to make public his desire but this news from Sahara Reporters is absolutely untrue. It is falsehood and we deny it in its entirety. It’s part of the calculated attempt by the opposition to try and throw everything into the arena to embarrass this President.”

  • $9.3m arms deal: Presidency exonerates Oritsejafor

    $9.3m arms deal: Presidency exonerates Oritsejafor

    ‘He has no case to answer’

    The Federal Government vindicated yesterday the President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, in the alleged involvement of his aircraft in the controversial $9.3m arms deal in South Africa.

    The Senior Special Assistant to President Goodluck Jonathan (Public Communication), Dr. Doyin Okupe, told reporters in Abuja that Oritsejafor, the Founder of the Word of Life Bible Church, has no hand in the deal.

    He said: “Most Nigerians do not respect the sensibilities of other people. Oritsejafor is the President of CAN and head of all Christians in Nigeria, who is representing at least, 50 per cent of people in this country. When it comes to a man like that, people should be cautious and circumspect.”

    Okupe advised Nigerians not to play politics with issues of national concern, saying it was not patriotic.

    According to him, the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) did well by telling the truth.

    The presidential aide said it would not be proper for the government to make public its plans on how to tackle insecurity.

    Okupe said: “The linking of Pastor Oritsejafor with the controversial $9.3m arms deal is the most unfortunate thing. To put the very respectable, responsible, honest and sincere CAN President in this matter is the extreme of mischief. It shows what Nigerians can do. They go to any extent to politicise everything. What bothers me is the manner people want to bring down Pastor Oritsejafor on this matter. It is pure absurdity.

    “Oritsejafor has no business in this matter. It is true that he owns the aircraft, but there are over 200 Nigerians, who have jets. Besides those who use them frequently, some give them out to get money and defray costs. If you park your jet, you pay parking charges everyday.

    “He gave the jet to a company to manage. The company is managing it and these people gave out the plane. What has this to do with Oritsejafor? If I have many cars at the airport and decide to give one to a car hire service and he decides to carry somebody having Indian hemp, would you link me with the man who gave it out? Excuse me, this is ridiculous.”

    He also responded to criticisms that the issue went out of hand because government did not speak on the issue before embarking on the adventure.

    Okupe said: “Government cannot share all information about the issues because it is a security matter. It is an issue, which we cannot just bring to the public domain. For goodness sake, we need to have some quiet innocent support. I am surprised that Nigerians want to discuss security issues publicly when a war is still going on.

    “These are very serious national security affairs and running a government is not the same thing as running a Shoprite, where everything is on the table and on display. There is nothing shady about the South African deal and the Office of the NSA has done very well because at the appropriate time, they came in that, ‘yes, this money belongs to us and this was what it was meant for’. That explanation itself was okay. There is no hanky- panky on this matter.”

    He said the second controversial deal had legitimised the first because it was a normal banking transaction.

    “A company was mandated to do a national security assignment for the Federal Government and because of the extant laws in South Africa, that company was unable to deliver its contractual agreement with the Nigerian government. The company wants a refund, which is normal.”

  • Presidency holds land reform workshop in Southeast

    Stakeholders in the Southeast geo-political zone have converged on Enugu on the promptings of the Presidential Technical Committee on Land Reform (PTCLR) to brainstorm on Land Reform and Systematic Land Titling and Registration (SLTR).

    The workshop, which was coordinated by the Enugu State Ministry of Works, was attended by top government officials, traditional rulers, heads town unions as well as professionals on aspects of land from the five Southeast states. It was aimed at explaining the benefits of Systemic Land Titling and Registration (SLTR) and to convince them to adopt it.

    It is the first in the series to be held in all the six geo-political zones of the country.

    The benefits, according to the Presidential Technical Committee include significant enhancement in tenure security for all land resources, help to properly plan and manage the country’s land resources, generating reasonable revenue from land through land tax and land transaction fees, helping the development of land/mortgage market and promote economic growth, addressing the massive social inequities and issues that stem from the informalities in the land system and reducing land conflicts and attendant loss of lives and properties arising from tenure insecurity.

    Other benefits include improving food security by empowering farmers to access funds through the use of their lands as collaterals, enhancing rural and urban planning and boosting investment generally because of easier access to land.

    The Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Anyim Pius Anyim, on the occasion made a startling revelation. Anyim, who was represented by Senator Ben Collins Ndu, shocked everyone when he said only three per cent of Nigeria’s approximately 923,768 sq. km of land has been duly documented, titled and registered. Anyim was declaring the workshop open on behalf of the Federal Government.

    He said land ownership was a critical factor in the socio-economic and political life of any country, even as he regretted that documentation and registration have been low.

    He told participants that due to poor documentation, titling and registration of the country’s land, the country has continued to be rated poorly among the comity of nations “with regard to the speed and efficiency in the processes and procedures for land governance.”

    The implication, he said, was that the land resources in Nigeria have not been put to optimal economic advantage, pointing out that the primary focus of the land reform effort was that the result would empower individual land holders and enable them to harness the wealth inherent in their land asset.

    He further said it was gladdening to know that the pilot Systematic Land Titling and Registration (SLTR) projects already embarked upon by the Land Reform Committee in collaboration with Ondo and Kano state governments respectively, were yielding remarkable results.

    Also commendable, he said, was the fact that the international development partners such as Growth and Empowerment in States (GEMS) which, he said, was funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), have supported the projects in these states while embarking on similar projects in a few other ones.

    “The pilot projects have proved that land titling could be transparent and quick,” Anyim remarked, adding that “the process of recording every parcel in the presence of adjoining owners is also expected to significantly reduce endless litigations. We are expecting that the first set of Certificate-of-Occupancy shall soon be rolled out from the pilot projects.”

    Anyim explained that the comprehensive inventory of land holdings across the country that would be generated from the ongoing titling projects should also aid housing census and provide data for planning.

    “It is pertinent to state that the greatest beneficiaries of the land reform programme are states and local governments…the revenues arising from the processes shall also accrue to the respective states,” he said.

    Advising state governments to understand the programme and sincerely key into the project, Anyim said the country has reached a stage “where appropriate inventory of our land holdings should be the concern of all.”

    The Minister of Lands, Housing and Urban Development; Mrs. Akon E. Eyakenyi, commended the Presidential Technical Committee on Land Reform for organising the forum, thereby providing stakeholders the opportunity to engage on issues of reforming the land governance and administration processes in the country.

    The minister, who was represented by a director in the ministry, Mrs. Margaret Okolo-Ebube, said the aim of the workshop was to provide full understanding of the land reform processes and benefits to facilitate buy-in and ownership by all stakeholders, especially those in the Southeast zone.

    She said land was strategic and central to the national development process, emphasising that it was the “bedrock for the success of all government programmes and therefore the current transformation agenda of the Federal Government.”

    She recalled that President Goodluck Jonathan reconstituted the Committee on land reform in 2011, and noted with satisfaction the monumental successes that have been recorded by the committee since reconstitution.

    According to Eyakenyi, such successes recorded by the committee included drawing up the draft regulations under section 46 of the Land Use Act which is “awaiting consideration of the National Economic Council before submission to the National Council of States and the ongoing pilot schemes of the Systematic Land Titling and Registration in Kano and Ondo states.”

    At the end of the conference, a communiqué was issued and read by the Chairman of the Presidential Technical Committee on Land Reform, Prof. Peter Adeniyi in which it was resolved that the SLTR “is a process that enables complete inventory of land holdings and subsisting interest in a declared area.

    It was resolved that there should be continued sensitisation and mobilisation of stakeholders on the issue, even as there was the urgent need to embrace the process across all the states of the federation.

    The participants, according to Adeniyi, noted the importance and indispensable role of traditional rulers in land governance in Nigeria and appreciated that such role was being recognised in the implementation of SLTR.

    “It therefore called on the royal fathers and community heads to live up to expectation and play such role effectively when the process commences in their domains.”

  • Atiku declares for presidency today

    Atiku declares for presidency today

    •Southwest APC caucus endorses bid

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar will today declare his presidential ambition on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    His declaration is, however, coming against the backdrop of his bid to be endorsed by a Southwest caucus of the party.

    A statement by his media office in Abuja said the former Vice President would make his formal declaration at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre in Abuja at 10am.

    According to the statement, the activities marking the declaration would be a largely youth-focused event to emphasise Atiku’s passion for the challenges facing young men and women in the country.

    Youth economic empowerment is one of Atiku’s cardinal objectives because he regards them as the fulcrum around which the development and future of the country revolves, the statement noted.

    “In particular, the former Vice President is concerned about the alarming youth unemployment and he focuses on his policy objectives on the development of entrepreneurial skills for our youths so that they don’t have to depend entirely on the limited, if not elusive government jobs,” the statement added.

    A caucus of the APC in the Southwest has endorsed Atiku as the presidential candidate of the party.

    The caucus, known as the Atiku Abubakar Collectives, spoke at an interactive session with Atiku yesterday.

    The group, whose members were drawn from the six states of the Southwest and Kogi State, and led by Chief Bode Ajewole, said its endorsement of Atiku was predicated on the former Vice President being the most experienced among the likely contenders for the party’s ticket.

    Ajewole said: “Atiku has shown that he has the capacity to restore the unity, peace and prosperity of our great country.

    “At such a time like this when our country is at the threshold of disharmony, fuelled by mutual suspicion along ethnic and religious line, we need a strong leadership. A strong leadership by a bridge-builder; someone who understands the intricate nature of our geo-politics and strengthens the bonds of our unity as a people who share a common hope in a Nigeria for all Nigerians.”

    The Director-General of the Atiku Abubakar Campaign Organisation, Prof. Babalola Borishade, said it was important for supporters of Atiku to engage everyone within the APC and mobilise support for Atiku to emerge as the standard-bearer of the party.

    According to him, “our focus now is how we win the primaries of the party. In doing so, we have to thread very carefully. The strategies for each state are different. I understand that some of you are national delegates of the party. But what is important is to build the momentum in the party that will make our candidate emerge victorious and avoid being confrontational with other contestants. We should make sure that the party stands united during and after the contest for the presidential ticket.”

  • 2015: Presidency, PDP plot against Tambuwal

    2015: Presidency, PDP plot against Tambuwal

    Irked by an alleged plan by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, to contest the 2015 Presidency, the Presidency and the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are working on different options to cut him to size, reports Assistant Editor, Remi Adelowo

    he stage appears set for what promises to be an epic battle between the Presidency, the national leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on one hand and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, on the other.

    The Speaker had, last week, stirred the hornets net when he gave what many considered as his clearest hint yet that he may be bidding the PDP goodbye soon.

    Three years after he rallied forces within the PDP and other opposition parties to emerge as Speaker in contravention of the PDP’s zoning formula, which zoned the Speakership to the South-West region, the relationship between Tambuwal and the Presidency has been frosty at best.

    Months before he spoke last week on his future political ambition, the rumour mill has been agog on Tambuwal’s planned defection to the major opposition party, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and alleged intention to contest the 2015 Presidency on the platform of the party.

    Albeit for tactical reasons, the Sokoto State-born lawmaker refrained from speaking on this subject, leaving his spokesman and political associates to talk on his behalf. And even at that, statements volunteered by these people have been ambiguous thereby leaving room for more speculations on the Speaker’s post-2015 game plan.

    But with his last week’s comments where he reportedly said that Nigeria deserves a better leadership in 2015, the Presidency and the PDP, sources revealed, have allegedly reached the conclusion that Tambuwal must be checkmated ‘before it is too late.’

    The many plots against Tambuwal

    The checkmating strategy, when it comes into effect, would not be the first in the many plots against Tambuwal in the last three years.

    Banking on his broad-based support in the House, which defies political affiliation of his colleagues, Tambuwal has successfully survived several plots by forces allegedly backed by the Presidency to remove him from office.

    About three years ago in the aftermath of Hon. Farouk Lawan bribery scandal which rocked the House of Representatives to its foundation, some House members, allegedly backed by external forces, made attempts to link the Speaker to the scandal. But this move was thwarted following a vote of confidence passed on Tambuwal by his colleagues.

    Another instance was cited of an alleged plot allegedly spearheaded by a lawmaker from the South-South to impeach Tambuwal.

    The lawmaker, who is said to be the Chairman of a ‘Grade A’ committee, had attempted to pitch House members against the Speaker on the excuse that Tambuwal had been less than transparent in the purchase of Toyota Camry cars purchased for all the committees in the House in the discharge of oversight functions.

    To douse tension and put the record straight, the Speaker allegedly convened an executive session during which he reportedly laid bare all the facts of the case.

    But rather than mete out sanctions against the lawmaker as canvassed by majority of House members, the lawmaker was let off the hook after he tendered an apology to the Speaker.

    “Aside from the apology offered by the member, who is still occupying his position till date, no punitive measure was taken against him by the Speaker,” said a lawmaker, who was present while the whole drama played out.

    When all moves against the Speaker in the House failed, his antagonists shifted their plot against him to his home state, with alleged attempts to instigate the local chapter of the PDP to expel Tambuwal from the party.

    The alleged plan, it was gathered, was for the PDP local chapter to announce Tambuwal’s expulsion, with the national leadership coming into the picture later by ‘magnanimously’ converting the expulsion to suspension “pending further investigation.”

    Sources said the local executive members of the party, however, saw through the plot and declared that it was beyond them to expel him.

    The Nation learnt that days before the execution of the plot, some chieftains of the party in the state had allegedly gone round urging PDP members in Tambuwal’s local government to append their signatures and names to a “vote of no confidence” motion meant to be passed on the Speaker after his planned expulsion.

    But like a cat with the proverbial nine lives, the Speaker again survived the plot through the intervention of Governor Aliyu Magatakarda Wamakko.

    The governor, according to sources, reportedly prevailed upon the party chieftains in Tambuwal’s local government not to allow themselves be used to disturb the peace of the state.

    New offensive in the offing

    Not deterred on the many failed plots against Tambuwal in the past, sources revealed that Presidency strategists are exploring fresh options to get rid of the Speaker within the next two months.

    Buoyed by the recent defections of some APC, Labour Party (LP) and All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) members in the House of Representatives to the PDP (with more allegedly in the offing), hawks in the Presidency are said to be convinced that with the numerical advantage enjoyed by the PDP in the House, an impeachment move should be launched against Tambuwal as soon as possible.

    The calculations, it is said, is to put the Speaker on the defensive, giving little or no ample time to mobilise on his alleged presidential project.

    A source said, “The PDP leadership is eager to get rid of Tambuwal and seems confident of actualising the plan. What may likely happen is that PDP members in the House will be issued a stern directive to move against Tambuwal once the coast is clear.”

    Tambuwal’s counter-strategy

    Aware that the Presidency and the PDP leadership can’t wait for too long to see his back, sources disclosed that the Speaker’s camp has also devised measures to save his job.

    The Speaker’s greatest strength is his close relationship with his colleagues, which transcends official or party matters.

    For most of the House members, particularly those committee chairmen, The Nation gathered that they have vowed to remain loyal to the Speaker, who despite pressure from some unnamed forces, have consistently declined to remove them.

    This tactical decision, more than anything else, has ensured the stability of the 7th National Assembly and consolidated the support base of the Speaker.

    How Tambuwal will continue to navigate the landmines laid on his path in the months ahead remains to be seen.

  • ‘PDP can’t foist life presidency on Nigerians’

    ‘PDP can’t foist life presidency on Nigerians’

    Kano State Governor Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso spoke with reporters in Kano, the state capital, on what he described as the alleged plot by the Presidency to impose a new constitution on Nigerians through the National Conference. He also spoke on the resolve of the All Progressive Congress (APC) to sack the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from Aso Rock in next year’s election. KOLADE ADEYEMI was there.

    What is your view on the latest controversy in the National Conference over the constitution amendment?

    In my last chat with you, when I mentioned the issue of the new constitution and the conference, many people thought it was a joke. But, this is a very bitter reality. Today immediately after the Council meeting, I received so many calls from Northern delegates attending the National Conference in Abuja that the issue of new constitution is now a reality at the confab. Of course, people who love this country and really understand the situation we are today; and the likely consequences of another brand new constitution, which the President wants to use to start another eight years, beginning from 2015. Certainly, it is a very dangerous development.

    Let me take this opportunity to thank all those who have rejected the issue of new constitution. Let me also take the opportunity to thank the National Assembly members because they were the ones that have received the earlier plan, earlier efforts by those at the Villa to have one single term of six years beginning from 2015, which they rejected. Now, they are smuggling it into the confab. Now, I believe that the delegates, whether from the North or from the South, whether they are Christians or Muslims, whether Igbo, Yoruba, Hausa or any other tribe, should help in rejecting that constitution because that will not help this country. That is why we told our delegates very clearly that they owe this country a duty of rejecting that new constitution. We have seen some of the things contained in the new constitution, especially the issue of the six-year single term. And the issue of 50 per cent derivation, the scrapping of 774 local governments, listing additional 18 states, and limiting the number of ministers to 18. The only good thing that I saw there is the limiting of ministers to 18.

    Is the North not monitoring its delegates?

    We only hope that those who are pretending to be representing us there in Abuja will have no place when they will come back or remain there in Abuja. We will send them to the almajiri schools that were being built by Jonathan. And I believe that all of us should come and join hands and save this country. It is difficult to know their thinking in Abuja. The saying that the higher it goes, the cooler it becomes is very apt in apt in describing the situation in Abuja today. Those that are very high are in a very cool atmosphere while the masses, the people of this country, are suffering from poverty. Illiteracy is killing this part of the country; and of course, the issue of insecurity. Every day, people are being killed and maimed; everyday, properties are being destroyed. As we are sitting here, displaced Nigerians in Borno are now taking refuge in the forest. Many of them are in Cameroon, many are in Chad, and also thousands are in Niger Republic. What we are talking here is to change the tenure of Jonathan to life Presidency. It is very sad that this thing is happening now and I am one of those that have travelled across the world or have the opportunity to read a lot; the Nigeria’s history, geography and of course, political situation across the world. What is happening today in Nigeria, if 10 per cent of it can happen anywhere, that leadership cannot stand; and it is very dangerous for all of us. We are very happy here with what we are doing for the people of the state; but we are very angry because we have read the minds of our people because they are not happy with what Aso Villa is doing. We have never seen anything like this in this part of the country; and they seem not to care. They seem not to understand, they are very busy in the air, working for themselves and helping themselves to steal forever. I always remind people that, when terrorism started in the Northeast, little did many people know that, one day, it will come to this part of the country. We have it here; it is also in the Northcentral, and now, it is crossing over to the South. I am sure that you are aware that some parts of this country now have flags other than green-white-green. This is terribly ugly and unprecedented. It is up to us to appeal to our delegates and Nigerians to resist the temptation of the so-called dollars people are distributing in Abuja to come and save this country. Any constitution rather than the 1999 Constitution should be rejected because any thing less than that is an instrument designed by those who think it will help them. But, it will not.

    As an opposition figure, what steps are you likely to take to ensure that the new constitution does not see the light of the day?

    One of the steps is what we are doing here. We want to make our position very clear to them and the entire world, especially our friends across the world that we believe that what is happening now is very dangerous, not only in Nigeria, but for our neighbours. I believe the consequences will affect the continent. That is why I thought I should take this opportunity to appeal to all Nigerians to shun the divisive tendency that we are seeing in Abuja. We have seen the division of the North and the South, the division of Christians and Muslims, the division and division of tribes. That is the keyword. The keyword now is the divide-and-rule, and I don’t think that will help. And from the information I have, which is not correct, that many people are saying those who are not supporting the new constitution are the minorities and that, whether they like it or not, tomorrow, they will push it to Nigerians, and the next thing is to organise a kangaroo referendum. They will cook the figures like they did in Ekiti and force themselves on us. I don’t think that is good enough. I appreciate the elasticity of Nigerians, but I think that elasticity has a limit. When you keep on pulling and pulling, there will come a time when it will not take anymore. That is why I think the good people of this country should speak because some of the consequencies, as many people are now seeing, will affect everybody.

    Your party, the APC won the Osun governorship election. What is the implication of that victory for 2015 general elections?

    Well, my party won the elections. My opinion and the opinion of my party is that we won the Ekiti governorship election. I think that is why the party is in court. The experience that we had in Ekiti worked for us in Osun because people came en mass and defended their votes and that is exactly what is going to happen in 2015. People will vote, and not only vote, they will stay and defend their votes. Let me thank the social media. Those who have cooperated with us and those who have supported us as a party that made it very very difficult for anybody to change the real figures. If they had done that in Ekiti, I am sure they wouldn’t have had the chance to rig us out. But to us, the Ekiti experience is a lesson. Also that of Osun. We have learnt from our mistakes. The INEC is improving and I hope the security agencies should also improve. We always tell them that, instead of militarising Ekiti and Osun with mass security agents, they should go to southern Borno and do their job there so that we can have free and fair elections and also have a peaceful country. So, we are happy that the people of Osun and Ekiti came en mass to vote for the APC, and I am sure, given an opportunity again, especially in Adamawa where they used the executive power from Abuja to force Nyako out of office because of his opinion, I believe that, when the election comes, people will come out en mass and support the APC so that we can have peaceful Northeast, different from what we are seeing now like the emergency in the state and other states in the Northeast, so that people can continue their normal businesses, people can come down from the rocks and hills and forests to go to their towns and villages. In that part of the country, nobody is talking about education, nobody is talking about agriculture, nobody is talking about business. People are talking about survival; what to eat and how to see the next day. These are the things that, by the grace of God, the APC will provide in 2015.

    From what is happening, there are indications that 2015 may be violent. What are your fears?

    Our fear is not only about 2015. We are also praying for this President to take the ship to the shores of 2015. I think we are more concerned about that because the way things are going now, the way people are dying, the way people are being kicked out of their homes; when we are seeing the picture, I believe it is not the best; and I believe that Nigerians are being taken for granted. And we hope that 2015 is going to be peaceful and we will do everything possible to ensure that it is peaceful from our own end because we believe that everybody wants a united Nigeria where an Igbo man will continue to stay in Kano. You know here in Kano, we have what we call New Enugu. If you go close to the airport, you will see a whole area that we called New Enugu. It is looking like any part of Abuja. We are very happy that we have them here; and we hope one day, we will have New Kano in Enugu, New Kano in Port Harcourt, New Sokoto in Adamawa, and so on and so forth. Here, we are working to integrate our people, here we are together as Muslims and Christians, Hausa, Igbos, Yorubas—we are one and the same. We are all Nigerians. That is what we want in this country and that is the best way we can have peace. Otherwise, by the time every party like what they are doing, we begin to divide, I don’t think that it will be good. During democracy, all these tendencies tend to go down while the unity of people based on political parties will come up and that is why I always tell people we should see ourselves as brothers, irrespective of our religion or where we come from.

    Former Chairman of the EFCC, Nuhu Ribadu, has defected to the PDP…

    People ordinarily will think that my brother, Nuhu Ribadu, is a principled person; somebody with good ideology, somebody who is progressive; somebody who is always working towards the unity of this country. I remember during his days as the Chairman of EFCC, he has done so much to deal with corruption. As we are moving into democracy, water is taking its level, people are moving in and out of parties, meaning that people with similar ideologies are coming together, unlike 1998/99 when we were forming parties to deal with the military and install democracy. Everybody from all ideological tendencies came together. Now that we have gone deep into democracy, we are looking at our shoulders to say who is close to who and who is on the other side, and that was why some of us left the PDP to join our brothers and sisters who have the same ideology with us to bring about the desired change in this country. Now, for him who was, in my opinion, in the right place and together with the progressives, if he should just leave because he is looking for position or he is looking for a ticket to contest election, I don’t think that is good for him and I don’t think that is good for the country. At the end of the day, if that happens, God forbid, he will be the biggest loser. He will lose because most of them were jailed by him. I don’t think they will ever want to see him there, but in politics, there is this accommodation of people that they will bring you close, raise you up and dump you. At the end of the day, they will laugh at you and say, look at him now. If Ribadu is joining the PDP, whether he wins election or not, he will be the biggest loser. People can’t believe that all what we said about him was completely wrong. The biggest punishment for a politician is for him to be in a wrong place; because if he goes there, by the time they are talking about how to share $20 billion, I don’t think he will be happy, if he is the kind of person I use to know, unless he was just deceiving all of us. I don’t think Nuhu Ribadu will make that mistake because if he does, it will be the biggest political mistake of his life.

    Is the defection from the APC not worrisome?

    Well, it doesn’t worry me at all. It is something that we should expect. I wasn’t in the APC. I left the PDP because I realised it was not a place that I should be and that was why I moved. And of course, those who were in the ACN, the CPC, the ANPP and the APGA who are now in the APC, they would have moved and don’t forget, we are dealing with a government that has accumulated so much money to the extent that they see everybody as a commodity and attach price tag on him. I believe that not everybody will be on this side. When they start dangling some dollars, you begin to wonder whether you stay or go. That is not the issue. The issue I believe is the people. Some of us are lucky in the sense that we have so many people behind us. So, we are so heavy that it is not an issue for us to be flying from one pole to another. And once we decide to do it, we do all the arithmetic, we do all the calculations that are necessary so that we can go with almost 100 per cent and that is what we have done here in Kano. So, there is limitation, but those who align to it—it is very simple because they believe that their wives and children are behind them. It is very easy for them to change position. You see, in politics, you don’t sit down and start looking around and be chasing luck. Stay where you are and work hard. You don’t have to win elections all the time. I contested elections 12 times, including primary and secondary elections, and I lost one-that was the governorship election of 2003. It was a big lesson to me. I learnt so much. I was humbled and I am very proud of that particular election. One out of 12. I believe any politician who has never won election or never lost election or only had one—that to me is not a complete politician-you need to win, you need to lose election; with that, you have to know how to manage success, you will have to know how to manage failure. You cannot do anyone of them, if you don’t have both experience. That is the position under which I believe that we will continue to work together as progressives to make this country better for all of us.