Tag: protests

  • Protests: Kaduna, Zaria residents jubilate relaxation of curfew, recount ordeals

    Protests: Kaduna, Zaria residents jubilate relaxation of curfew, recount ordeals

    Residents of Kaduna and Zaria on Thursday Thursday jubilated the relaxation of the 24-hour curfew imposed on the two cities by the state government.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) the state government had on Monday declared the curfew on the two cities sequel to the hijacking of the #endbadgovernance nationwide protests.

    NAN also recalls that the obnoxious development resulted in a melee, leading to the destruction of public and private property, including one of the commercial banks domiciled in one of the campuses of Kaduna Polytechnic.

    NAN Correspondents who monitored the situation on Thursday learnt that most banks, markets, motor parks, other private and public offices have opened for business.

    Commercial vehicles and motorcyclists were also seen busy conveying passengers, criss-crossing the two cities.

    NAN also observed the security agencies including the military were not complacent as they were busy patrolling the streets, with so many fixed patrol posts.

    A cross section of the residents told NAN that they were highly elated with the relaxation of the curfew by the state government.

    “It was never easy to survive with the 24-hour curfew. Majority of us struggle with what to feed our families on daily basis.

    “We are happy that it has been relaxed, then our daily hustles and bustles continue,” Salisu Aminu, said.

    For Mrs Ada Joseph, a trader at the Abubakar Sheikh Gumi market, said, “It was really hell these past days.

    ”We are however hopeful that with the relaxation of the curfew, things will gradually return to normal.”

    Read Also: Protests: DSS arrests seven Europeans

    In Zaria, the residents corroborated the submissions by the residents of Kaduna, expressing joy with the happy development.

    NAN also observed that the relaxation of the curfew has reignited business activities in the metropolis.

    “The popular Sabon Gari market has been reopened, with an unusual rush by the customers,” said Malam Mohammed Nura, a cosmetics and perfume dealer in the market.

    Commercial activities have also resumed at the ever-busy PZ and Kofar Doka areas.

    A NAN Correspondent in  the city further observed the return of commercial activities by the commercial tricycle riders along major routes in the city.

    NAN also observed the presence of security personnel at strategic locations, with the atmosphere in the area being calm and peaceful.

    (NAN)

  • Protests: We are ready for dialogue – Arewa Youths

    Protests: We are ready for dialogue – Arewa Youths

    The Arewa Youth Assembly for Good Leadership (AYAGL) has announced its readiness to engage in dialogue with the federal government.

    It also gave the governor until the end of next week to initiate this dialogue process; saying it would have no choice but to resume street protests.

    AYAGL Speaker, Ambassador Andul Danbature, one of the protest organizers, shared this update in a telephone conversation shortly after his appearance on Channels Television, where he provided further insights into the protest and its suspension.

    He said: “We started this movement because we want to express our grievances and anger and the need for the federal government to meet our needs.

    “Some of our demands include the return back of fuel subsidy, creation of employment opportunities for youths, stoppage of payment to ex-governors, relocation of all service Chiefs to North West to address insecurity holistically dress insecurity holistically and reversal of harsh government policies among several others.

    “We however commended the federal government for calling for dialogue which we have agreed to because the peaceful protest which we started has been hijacked by hoodlums which is not part of our plans and that is why we have suspended the protest to take the part of dialogue with the government.

    Read Also: Protests: Abuja NSCDC arrests 12 for vandalism

    “Our major problem is the removal of fuel subsidy and naira inflation which has affected poor masses and resulted in unemployment. There is no single development on the ground that will benefit the poor masses directly, all we know is that money is being released from the federation account to the National Assembly and also to the governors.

    “When we started this movement, we sensitised the youths to understand that our major problem is the governors who sit on allocations from the federal government. We also engaged our coordinator at the local government to engage the governors.

    “We are ready to dialogue with the federal government on our demands and we are giving the government between now and next week, in which failure to do so, we will return back to the streets and continue the protest,” he stressed.

  • Presidency knocks Atiku over comments on #EndBadGovernance protests

    Presidency knocks Atiku over comments on #EndBadGovernance protests

    The Presidency has tackled former Vice President Atiku Abubakar over his comments on the aftermath of the #EndBadGovernance protests against hunger and economic challenges.

    In an X post on Tuesday, Atiku, who was the presidential candidate of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 election won by President Bola Tinubu said: “I wish to convey a stern caution to the distinguished service chiefs and military commanders of Nigeria’s armed forces that those who authorise the use of lethal force against peaceful civilian protesters will be held responsible for committing crimes against humanity, even in the years following their retirement from service.

    “The constitutional right to protest is firmly established within our supreme law and reinforced by the judiciary. It is the solemn duty of the government and security agencies to ensure a safe and protected environment for individuals exercising their right to peaceful protest.”

    However, in a statement late Tuesday, presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga asked Atiku to act like opposition figures in the United Kingdom “who have rallied behind the government to condemn the ongoing riots in the UK”.

    Read Also: Hunger protests: Hold governors responsible

    Onanuga blamed Atiku for not condemning the looting and destruction that trailed the nationwide protests in Nigeria in the last week.

    “As a statesman, his (Atiku) warning ought to be to the looting mob in Kaduna, Kano, Plateau, Jigawa states, who hijacked what was advertised by organisers as a peaceful protest.

    “Our security forces have remained professional, even-handed, and observed every restraint in the face of extreme provocation by the rioters.”

    Onanuga said that Section 40 of the 1999 constitution (as amended) guaranteed the right to protest, but Section 45 of the constitution said that the right is not absolute.

    “They can be abridged and fettered in the interest of public peace, public safety, law, and order,” he said, commending security agents for being professional.

    “We encourage Alhaji Atiku to borrow a leaf from opposition figures in the United Kingdom who have rallied behind the government to condemn the ongoing riots in the UK, calling for the arrest and prosecution of those behind the wanton destruction of public and private assets.

    “Such nationalistic temperament as displayed by opposition figures like Rishi Sunak, the immediate-past Prime Minister of the UK is expected of Alhaji Atiku,” Onanuga added.

  • A protest and its aftermath

    A protest and its aftermath

    In a way, it was good that the so-called #EndBadGovernance protests happened to the just over one-year-old Bola Tinubu government. He was hardly afforded the customary honeymoon period because right from the inauguration podium, he snatched ‘honey’ from many mouths with his declaration that ‘subsidy was gone.’

    It was a move that presidents who came before him were too frightened to make, knowing the consequences in a country that has been dependent on imported fuel for ages.

    But it was a decision around which a national consensus had formed. Leading presidential candidates like the People Democratic Party’s (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, and the Labour Party’s (LP), Peter Obi, committed to scrapping it. The latter even came up with a fancy soundbite – calling the subsidy regime ‘organised crime’ that he would remove from day one.

    In the event, the responsibility fell to Tinubu who won the election to do the honours. If Atiku and Obi had won and were true to their words, they would probably have faced the same inflation demons that were unleashed with more expensive imported fuel.

    So, the question is really not whether removing fuel subsidy was the way to go, because it was killing Nigeria. Even the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) had accepted it had to stop. The only point of cavil was when. They wanted refineries fixed first, an efficient mass transit system in place etc etc. Given that our four public-owned refineries have been under repair for nearly two decades, acceding to the unions’ demands was akin to permanently postponing the evil day.

    We know that up till last year, Nigeria was spending 97% percent of her earnings on servicing debts. A country that deep in the financial hole cannot pay for much else with the miserable three percent that is left; that includes paying for subsidy. The financing to continue delivering cheap fuel to the people would have to come from borrowing or cutting all sorts of unorthodox deals with our crude to raise cash. There were really no easy options left for this country and only those deceiving themselves would pretend there are.

    The new president had the option of continuing with the same old arrangement and face the very real possibility of the country not being able to meet its internal and external obligations, or dare to step where angels wouldn’t even tread.

    He bit the bullet by scrapping subsidies and ending multiple exchange rate regimes. We can argue all day as to whether it was wise to do one, not to talk of the two in one fell swoop.

    The cost of living crisis has been ferocious. We’ve seen in Kenya where President William Ruto pulled off the same fuel subsidy removal gambit, that the impact on prices can be bruising. Ever since, the consequences of those actions have hung over this administration like an ominous cloud.

    Tinubu spent much of the last 12 months staving off a potentially devastating national strike by the unions. But the best of his interventions haven’t slain the inflation monster. Courtesy of the new policies, federal and state governments now have more money to spend. We now know that state governments have received an estimated N570 billion in relief funds aside their higher takings from the Federal Account Allocation Committee (FAAC). This is in addition to other measures calculated to take the edge off the blow to the average man’s pockets.

    Read Also: Kaduna protests sponsored by external forces, says Gov Sani

    The common man doesn’t scrutinise the nation’s accounts and probably doesn’t care that Tinubu stepped in to meet the country spending 97% of her revenues on debt servicing. He is hungry and food prices are out of reach, so he blames the president. Cartels that have been feeding fat on fuel imports, and probably have a hand in ensuring that refineries never work, would certainly not be pleased that the new man wants to snatch the lollipop out of their mouths.

    Conscious of the unrelenting cries about hunger and hardship, Tinubu has even had to execute a u-turn, approving a short term food importation exercise – something he had vowed not to do earlier this year. If so much is being done to assuage suffering, questions have to be asked whether this flood of cash and other palliatives are percolating down to the vulnerable targets.

    Clearly, they haven’t. Meanwhile, the pressure continued to mount with ominous warnings. It would take the Kenyan protests to give coherence to the muttering across the country.

    However, by plunging into a copycat agitation without putting local perspectives into consideration, the organisers saved the Tinubu administration from what could have been a more serious challenge if they had solely framed their agitation around hunger.

    These protests meant different things to different people. That was why the list of demands had at least 15 items. Everyone jumped on the bandwagon: ethnic jingoists, separatists, failed politicians and their supporters nursing hangovers from last year’s polls, rebels without a cause, anarchists, agent provocateurs from the diaspora, idealists with their heads buried in the clouds, ‘experts’ who haven’t successfully run their own lives but presume to have the blueprint for saving Nigeria etc etc.

    Many initially embraced the action because ‘hunger protest’ was something they could relate to. Alas, it was just a smoke screen for those with a more ambitious agenda of making the country ungovernable and ultimately unseating an administration they cannot abide. For such people ‘peaceful protests’ wouldn’t hack it and an uprising had to be manufactured.

    Nigeria has 36 states and six geopolitical zones. The violence has been most pronounced in the Northwest and Northeast. The North-Central zone was largely quiescent with the exception of Plateau State. There were protests in the three Southern zones but not of the feral nature seen up North. Sulking over a multitude of grievances, leading Southeast figures had campaigned in the weeks leading to the protests for their people to stay out of it, sensing that this was actually a political slugfest masquerading as a revolution.

    I am sure that the organisers expected more from Lagos given its peculiar circumstance as Tinubu’s home state and its past history as epicentre for popular agitation. There were indeed protests but the government and stakeholders had for weeks pushed a counter narrative that the state would not allow a repeat of the #EndSARS carnage. That robust and uncompromising message, along with a court order limiting the protests to specific locations, helped in defanging what could have become another episode of burning and looting similar to what happened in 2020.

    As it turned out, the streets were largely empty on the first two days of the protests. This wasn’t necessarily in solidarity with the goals of the agitators, but rather a wise decision by those who had been burnt in the past, to stay out of harm’s way. They knew from bitter experience that Nigerians don’t do ‘peaceful protests.’

    What has played out in Kano, Kaduna and certain parts of the North has been very revealing. Following an age-old pattern, almajiri – many of them not up to 10 years old – have been let loose on the streets in an orgy of looting and destruction by faceless sponsors. In Borno State, Governor Babagana Zulum confessed that 95% of the so-called protesters were underage.

    These are the same sort of children handed Russian or Nigerian Army flags in Kano and Kaduna to solicit a coup or foreign intervention. Those behind this sinister plot would rather it all went to hell than for the current administration to continue in power. They thought to undermine Tinubu but have turned many off by selling the discredited military rule option. Baying for Russia to bail them out is hilarious given that that country is still trying to disentangle itself from its Ukraine misadventure.

    There is abysmal poverty in Northern Nigeria, no doubt, but no one should blame it on a one-year-old administration. Many leaders from the region who have been attacking the president ought to hang their heads in shame having been part of governments that have led Nigeria for the bulk of her years as an independent nation. In all the years they led this nation – especially in boom periods – they did nothing to lift up their people. They created the mess they want the incumbent to clean up in 12 months.

    By politicising these protests, the enemies of the administration have shown their hands and done their worst. They sought to give Tinubu a bloody nose, even unseat him, but failed. The unintended consequence of their actions is that they’ve given him and his team the breathing space to pursue the path of recovery they have chosen.

  • Hunger protests: Hold governors responsible

    Hunger protests: Hold governors responsible

    SIR: While many Nigerians blame the president for the hardships in the country, the real culprits are often overlooked: state governors that actually contribute 80-90% to the current situation. The removal of the fuel subsidy, which many citizens are urging the president to reinstate, was expected to stabilize the economy. However, since the subsidy was removed, each state has seen a significant increase in their monthly revenue from the federal government – the Federation Account Allocations Committee (FAAC).

    Yet, the question remains: Have you seen any positive changes in your state government due to the subsidy removal? Have these leaders done anything extraordinary to improve the lives of their people?

    In Bauchi State, where I reside, there have been no new appointments; no salary increases, no welfare programmes, and salaries are often delayed almost every month. When it comes to minimum wage, many governors claim they cannot pay. So, what are they doing with the increased revenue from the subsidy removal?

    Before the fuel subsidy was removed, the FAAC monthly revenue distribution was considerably lower.

    For example, in April 2023, the FAAC allocation was N655.9 billion. In June 2023, the allocation jumped to N1.9 trillion, more than double the amount from May 2023. A total of N9.9 trillion was shared in the latter half of 2023.

    Here are some examples of state allocations before and after the subsidy removal:

    Nasarawa: Average monthly allocation rose by 185.3%, from N4.34 billion to N12.39 billion. Enugu: Allocation increased by 94.3%, from N3.47 billion to N6.72 billion.

    -Anambra saw a 74.1% rise, from N4.34 billion to N7.56 billion. Bauchi State’s average monthly FAAC allocation increased by 51.5%; from N4.8 billion to around N7.3 billion.

    Read Also: Kaduna protests sponsored by external forces, says Gov Sani

    Despite the increased allocations, there has been no marked improvement in the financial conditions of the citizens. National lawmakers are not taking any significant actions to reduce the public’s anger. Is this the kind of representation we voted for?

    Every citizen has the constitutional right to demand better from their representatives. If your senator or local leader is not serving you well, call for change and replace them with someone who will.

    I urge our leaders to take immediate action to ease the public’s suffering. Implement job creation programmes, social welfare initiatives like the N-Power programme under President Buhari, and make life easier for the citizens. The youth are protesting for a reason; it is time to address these issues to calm the unrest.

    •Yasir Shehu Adam (Danliman),

    Bauchi.

  • Protests: APC condemns attack on Zamfara party secretariat

    Protests: APC condemns attack on Zamfara party secretariat

     The Zamfara chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has condemned the attack on the state secretariat of the party by protesters.

    This is contained in a statement issued in Gusau on Monday by the State APC Publicity Secretary, Yusuf Idris.

    “The Zamfara chapter of the APC has condemned the attack on its state secretariat today, Monday, by miscreants who have taken over the nationwide hunger/economic hardship protests in the state.

    “We recalled that the APC on Friday, cautioned the state government against allowing thugs from venting their anger on the APC and its leaders.

    Read Also: Protests: Kaduna, Zaria calm as residents comply with 24-hr curfew 

    “Recently, thugs used the same protests to attack the residence of Sen. Sahabi Ya’u (APC-Zamfara North) in Kaura Namoda and the attempt to raze  the residence of the immediate past Governor, Bello Matawalle, in Gusau,”Idris said.

    He further said that the party had also pleaded with security agencies to ensure the full protection of people’s lives and property.

    “The most unfortunate incident happened today, Monday when the hoodlums in the name of protests forcefully broke into the APC Secretariat situated along Sokoto Bye Pass Road, Gusau.”

    Idris added that the protesters had destroyed the facility including glasses, doors and carted away furniture, equipment as well building materials that were kept in the office’s stores.

    “They also looted the mini secretariat at the back of the main office, where all the furniture, computers, refrigerators and other valuables were carted away.

    “This is unacceptable and condemnable, we are calling on the security agencies to immediately apprehend and bring the perpetrators of this dastardly act to book

    “We caution our members, supporters and well wishers to continue to remain peaceful and law abiding,” Idris explained.

    (NAN)

  • Protests: Cautious optimism as normalcy returns to Kano, Katsina

    Protests: Cautious optimism as normalcy returns to Kano, Katsina

    There is cautious optimism as normalcy is gradually returning to Kaduna, Kano and Katsina States in the wake up of the nationwide #endbadgovernance protests that began on Thursday.

    A Correspondent of the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that monitored the situation in Kaduna city and its environs on Monday reports that there were vehicular movements, with scores of passengers seen en route their various offices and commercial premises.

    At the Federal Secretariat, Kawo-Kaduna, NAN learnt that only janitors and security staffers were met as at 9:08am.

    “No worker has reported as of now. This may be due to the situation in the country, but I am not sure.

    “Maybe they will come later but I am not authorised to speak to the press,” an anonymous source told NAN at the secretariat.

    It was also observed that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and majority of the commercial banks have opened for business.

    However, some customers were seen grudgingly discussing in groups in front of the gate of one of the banks that has not opened for business.

    However, ATM outlets were operating, with several customers seen patronising them.

    Similarly, security operatives were seen patrolling the streets of the city and its environs, with some of them stationed in strategic locations, armed to the teeth.

    A combined team of the military and other security personnel were also seen keeping vigil in all the roads leading to the Government House, Kaduna.

    NAN recalls that some irate youths had on Thursday attempted to forcefully gain access into the government house on Thursday.

    It was alleged that one person had consequently lost his life in the ensuing altercation between the youths and the security agents.

    The Kaduna State Police Command,however, denied the allegation, insisting that nobody lost his life.

    In Kano State, the residents were  adhering to the recently imposed curfew, which now runs from 8am to 2pm, marking a significant shift from the previously enforced 24-hour curfew.

    This adjustment has contributed to a notable improvement in the security situation in the area.

    Meanwhile, the Katsina State Police Command has reiterated that the government’s ban on all forms of protest, unlawful assembly and curfew throughout the state was still in force.

    This is contained in a statement issued by the command’s Public Relations Officer (PPRO), ASP Abubakar Aliyu, on Monday in Katsina.

    He said: “The 24-hour curfew enforced on Dutsinma LGA and 12 hours from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. in the remaining 33 LGAs of the state, is still in force.

    “This measure is aimed at preventing further escalation of violence, vandalism, looting of private and public property, and at maintaining public safety and security.”

    Aliyu said that the command remained committed to enforcing the ban while ensuring that peace and order would soon be fully restored across the state.

    “We are calling on the good people of Katsina State to continue to cooperate with the command as well as other security agencies in this effort.

    “Your understanding and compliance are crucial to maintaining the safety and security of the state.

    Read Also: Nigerians blast Sowore for insisting protests continue

    “We are calling on the parents and guardians to caution their children and wards against engaging in acts that are in conflict with the law, and to encourage them to remain law-abiding citizens,” he said.

    Aliyu added that the police were urging the public to remain calm and go about their lawful activities within the confines of the law.

    “We will not hesitate to take decisive action against anyone who violates this ban.

    ” Let us work together to ensure peace and stability in Katsina State,” he said

    NAN reports that normal business activities have already continued in Katsina metropolis and other places.

    The residents were undertaking their lawful activities in all the 33 LGAs with the exception of Dutsin-ma where a 24-hour curfew was still in force.

    (NAN)

  • Counting the cost of protests: Billions in losses, widespread destruction

    Counting the cost of protests: Billions in losses, widespread destruction

    In a few days marked by intense protests, Nigeria is facing a mounting crisis of destruction and loss. Infrastructure has been severely damaged, with estimates suggesting a staggering N500 billion reduction in GDP. As unrest sweeps from Kano to Borno, the extent of the devastation becomes increasingly apparent. President Bola Tinubu has called for calm, urging citizens to rethink their involvement in the protests and underscoring the government’s commitment to addressing the underlying issues. In this special report, BOLAJI OGUNDELE writes on the profound impact of the protests on the nation’s economy and social fabric.

    In a single day of intense unrest, Nigeria has begun to tally its losses. Media reports indicate significant damage to public and private property, along with the tragic loss of lives in some regions. Economically, the impact has been severe, with the organised private sector estimating that Nigeria lost at least N500 billion of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on Thursday alone.

    From Kano to Borno, Kaduna, Katsina, Jigawa, Gombe, Niger, and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), the reports are alarming. In Borno, a state still grappling with the aftermath of Boko Haram terrorism, a deadly blast in Kawuri Village, Konduga council area, claimed 19 lives and left many others seriously injured. There had been warnings that protests in such volatile regions could be hijacked by violent elements. Just a month ago, a suicide blast in Gwoza council area killed 18 people. In Kano, widespread looting was reported, and similar scenes of chaos unfolded in other parts of the country. Prior to the protests, various Nigerian groups and individuals had cautioned that the current atmosphere was not conducive to protests, pointing to previous instances in Africa where protests had resulted in further harm to people and their livelihoods.

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and First Lady Oluremi Tinubu were among those who tried to reason with those mobilising for the nationwide #EndBadGovernance protest. In a meeting with a group of Ulamas at the State House, a week before the protest’s commencement, the President acknowledged the citizens’ right to peaceful protest but expressed concerns about this particular demonstration, which had been dubbed “10 Days of Rage” by another group. During the meeting, President Tinubu, who has a history of leading peaceful protests, emphasised his support for peaceful expression but voiced worries about the timing and leadership of the current protest. He highlighted concerns regarding the potential for the protest to be hijacked, especially given the involvement of certain elements with controversial backgrounds, referencing the #EndSARS protest of 2020 and the 2023 elections.

    The President urged for alternative methods of seeking solutions, cautioning that protests could lead to more suffering for ordinary citizens. Addressing the Islamic leaders, who agreed with his concerns and called on the protest organisers to reconsider for the sake of vulnerable Nigerians, President Tinubu stressed that his apprehension was not about the protests themselves but about their potential negative impact on the people and the progress his administration aims to achieve in reordering Nigeria’s socioeconomic trajectory.

    “Nigeria is on the path of recovery. You have heard it from the Minister of Finance, Mr. Wale Edun. We are not afraid of protests. Our concern is the ordinary people, and the damages that will be done. Till today, I cannot forget the brand new 60 and 100 seater buses, down there in Lagos that were burnt down, and we are now complaining of transportation. That is the problem. That is why I must say thank you for talking to the citizens.

    “Yes, it is true that I asked for this job, and I approached some of you to support me. So, I have no excuse not to do the job with sincerity of purpose and honesty. I have committed myself to it diligently, and I will never look backwards. I have accepted the assets and the liabilities of my predecessor. How I will take Nigeria forward should be my concern, and that is my concern. I have been extremely busy. The only exercise I have had here is the walk from the residence to this place and then continue with the work. Nigeria is hilly, and it is the largest democracy in Africa. No other democracy comes close to us in terms of population on the continent. We cannot blame God for giving us these children, and we have to seek peace and better livelihoods,” the President said.

    First Lady Oluremi Tinubu cautioned against ‘unintended harm’ to public peace and appealed to those planning the protest to reconsider their actions, citing the potential harm it could cause to vulnerable Nigerians. Recalling the lasting impact of a similar protest on Lagos State’s economy and psyche, the First Lady urged organizers to consider the welfare of Nigerians who are already facing significant challenges. She emphasized the government’s ongoing efforts to create a conducive environment for all citizens and highlighted the importance of maintaining stability for the nation’s progress.

    “Lagos has not recovered from #EndSARS and it saddens our hearts and what people don’t realise is that when we’re drumming for things like that, we don’t know the backlash and what will happen after. All those things are very distracting and I will appeal to them to be patient; we didn’t come here playing. We came here to work because, one, I know we’ll leave this place one day and I want to go into a Nigeria that will not be a burden to me. I’ll be much older and I want to make sure that I take my rest in a very conducive and nice atmosphere and that’s what we’re doing.

    “This government has been working day and night to make sure that this country is put back on its feet. The respect we have now as Nigerians in international community is higher than what we’ve had in the past. People want to do business with Nigeria legitimately now because they know all cards are on the table. They want to do business with Nigerians legitimately and that will create jobs. So our youth should try to engage themselves, be creative, and do more. So everybody has to be creative, our youth have to be seen doing something, nobody’s going to even encourage and put money into the pocket of somebody who’s not doing anything,” she said.

    Some believe that despite the various cautions from government and other groups, particularly concerning the potential for the protest to be hijacked, the organisers should have reconsidered their actions. Critics argue that if the organisers’ motives were solely to address issues like alleged bad governance, hunger and insecurity, they would have taken the widespread warnings into account. In the days leading up to the protest, leaders from various parts of the country called for caution. Government officials, at multiple levels, repeatedly pleaded with the mobilisers to allow time for President Tinubu’s reforms to take effect.

    During the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting last Monday, it was emphasised that the administration was already addressing the demands cited by the protest organisers through various reforms and programmes. Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, and Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, reiterated that a protest was unnecessary given the ongoing efforts to tackle these issues. At the post-FEC briefing, Idris stated that the council concluded protests were unwarranted at this time, as the Tinubu administration is actively working on reforms, programmes, and projects that address most of the concerns raised by the protest organisers.

    “The position of the FEC is that most of the demands that the protesters are making are actually being addressed by the federal government and therefore it is the view of the government that there is really no need for the protests again because most of those things that the protesters are putting forward are already actually being addressed or are being addressed by government and like we have said repeatedly, this is a listening government.

    “The President has listened to be voices of all those who are planning this protest. And the message is that there is no need for it. Indeed, the President is already protesting on their behalf by doing those things that they want a government to do for example, the effort that government is making, in ensuring that food is being made available. The last Council meeting here at the briefing, we announced that a number of trucks 20 precisely had been given to the state governors for onward distribution to those who actually In need of them to poorest of the poor in society and those who are actually in need, but government did not stop there; there is also rice that is being sold at about 50% of its cost. A bag of rice is being sold at N40,000 as we speak now,” Idris said while speaking to journalists at the State House last Monday.

    Interior Minister Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, in support of Idris’s statements on the Federal Executive Council’s (FEC) decision, detailed the various reforms and programmes designed to rejuvenate the Nigerian system. He praised President Tinubu’s administration for its bold reforms and credited it for the gains made in the last 13 months. The Minister argued that the protests against bad governance are misdirected, as the current administration has made significant progress in addressing long-term problems. He cited examples such as the autonomy of local governments, the unification of the exchange rate, and the removal of subsidies as bold decisions taken by the President. Tunji-Ojo concluded that these reforms and initiatives demonstrate good governance, rendering the protests unwarranted.

    Read Also: Protests may worsen economy, says Urhobo clerics

    He particularly noted that the removal of the fuel subsidy and the promotion of local trade in crude oil or refined petroleum products using the naira are significant achievements poised to boost the energy sector and drive industrialisation. He explained that these decisions will attract industries and refineries to Nigeria, making the country energy-sufficient and a net exporter of refined products. This, he said, will create employment opportunities for youths and enhance their skill sets. Tunji-Ojo highlighted the unification of the exchange rate, a policy that he said has increased the predictability of FOREX and encouraged foreign direct investment. He also commended the President and the Minister of Health for initiatives such as the student loan programme and the provision of dialysis equipment, stating that these measures demonstrate the government’s commitment to addressing critical needs and improving the lives of Nigerians.

    On Day 4, which was Sunday, President Tinubu addressed all Nigerians, including those who saw no reason to join the protests. He called for calm and invited the protesters to engage in dialogue. This appeal came amidst circulating images on social media suggesting some dangerous international implications, as some protesters were seen holding Russian flags. “My dear Nigerians, especially our youth, I have heard you loud and clear. I understand the pain and frustration that drive these protests, and I want to assure you that our government is committed to listening and addressing the concerns of our citizens. But we must not let violence and destruction tear our nation apart. We must work together to build a brighter future, where every Nigerian can live with dignity and prosperity.

    “The task before us is a collective one, and I am leading the charge as your President. A lot of work has gone into stabilising our economy and I must stay focused on ensuring that the benefits reach every single Nigerian as promised. My administration is working very hard to improve and expand our national infrastructure and create more opportunities for our young people. Let nobody misinform and mis-educate you about your country or tell you that your government does not care about you. Although there have been many dashed hopes in the past, we are in a new era of Renewed Hope. We are working hard for you, and the results will soon be visible and concrete for everyone to see, feel, and enjoy.

    “Let us work together to build a brighter future for ourselves and for generations to come. Let us choose hope over fear, unity over division, and progress over stagnation. The economy is recovering; Please, don’t shut out its oxygen. Now that we have been enjoying democratic governance for 25 years, do not let the enemies of democracy use you to promote an unconstitutional agenda that will set us back on our democratic journey. Forward ever, backward never,” he appealed to the protesters.

    He also addressed security agencies, urging them to “continue to maintain peace, law, and order in our country following the necessary conventions on human rights, to which Nigeria is a signatory. The safety and security of all Nigerians are paramount.” The first day of the “10 Days of Rage” had a significant impact, seemingly diminishing the momentum for the remaining days. The second day of protests failed to match the intensity and scale of the first day, which had already caused considerable damage and shock. The events of Day 1, marked by fear and destruction, were exactly what the President had hoped to avoid, leaving many Nigerians, directly or indirectly affected, reluctant for the protests to continue.

  • When protests crossed the line

    When protests crossed the line

    • By Abdulhamid Abdullahi Aliyu

    Sir: The recent nationwide protests in Nigeria, sparked by widespread economic hardship have brought to the forefront the complex dynamics between peaceful advocacy and violent outbursts.

    In Kano State, the protests revealed a troubling transition from legitimate grievances to chaos, highlighting the thin line between civic expression and lawlessness. The movement initially rooted in calls for improved governance and economic relief, quickly escalated into violence in several states, including Abuja, Kano, Niger, Borno, Kaduna, and Jigawa.

    Tragically, at least 17 people were reported dead, with security forces clashing with demonstrators. In Kano, one person was killed, marking a tragic turn in what began as a peaceful demonstration. The protest in Kano, like in other parts of the country, began peacefully but soon spiralled out of control.

    Eyewitness accounts describe a scene of escalating tension, where demonstrators initially blocked highways and harassed motorists.  In a particularly disturbing incident, protesters in Kano targeted the newly established Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) office.

    The building, symbolizing a step towards greater digital connectivity and innovation, was looted and set ablaze. Everything, from office furniture to technological equipment, was taken or destroyed. This act of vandalism not only disrupted a crucial public service but also symbolized a broader collapse of order and respect for public property.

    During the protests, a poignant moment occurred when a female protester, carrying her baby, confronted police officers. Her husband had been killed by bandits in Katsina, and she came to the protest to voice her frustration with the government’s failure to address widespread insecurity and economic hardship.

    “Do they also want to kill my baby?” she asked, highlighting the desperation felt by many Nigerians. Similarly, the presence of pro-government demonstrators added another layer of complexity.

    The government’s response has been a mix of force and appeals for dialogue. Security forces, using teargas and pepper spray, tried to disperse the crowds, while helicopters overhead released additional teargas to control the situation. The use of such measures, however, did little to quell the unrest and instead fuelled public anger and defiance.

    Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike called for dialogue, emphasizing the government’s willingness to engage with the protesters. However, the continued violence and heavy-handed tactics used by the security forces suggest a deeper disconnect between the authorities and the populace.

    Read Also: Protests: Police blast Amnesty over inaccurate casualty figures

    The chaos in Kano and other states serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for economic and social reforms in Nigeria. While the protests highlight legitimate concerns over governance, security, and economic management, the turn to violence undermines these issues’ seriousness. 

    The destruction of public property, looting, and loss of lives cannot be condoned, as they detract from the core message of the protests and harm innocent citizens. Moving forward, it is crucial for both the government and protest leaders to find common ground. The government must not only listen to the demands of the people but also provide tangible solutions to the problems of unemployment, inflation, and insecurity.

    On the other hand, protest organizers must emphasize peaceful demonstration and discourage violence. The recent events in Kano and across Nigeria reflect a broader crisis of governance and trust. It is a wake-up call for all stakeholders to address the root causes of the discontent and work towards a more equitable and just society.

    Only through constructive engagement and mutual respect can Nigeria hope to navigate these turbulent times and build a future that meets the aspirations of all its citizens.

    •Abdulhamid Abdullahi Aliyu,

    abdulhamidabdullahiali@ gmail.com

  • Protests fuelled by partisan hypocrisy

    Protests fuelled by partisan hypocrisy

    • By Wole Olujobi

    Never since the recorded history of King Henry V111 of England have I read about hypocrisy so bland in its audacious cunning than the latest subterfuge by a section of our country Nigeria in its reaction to the politically-motivated “Endbadgovernance” nationwide protests targeted at President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in his economic reform agenda to shape Nigeria for good.

    I had thought that the Pharisees and Sadducees had stretched hypocrisy to its wits’ end when they confronted Jesus Christ and His disciples, accusing them of breaking Moses’ fourth commandment on the Sabbath holy day of rest by engaging in the healing of the sick.

    Responding, Jesus rebuked them, asking: “Who among you will have his sheep lost on Sabbath day without searching the field to find it”?

    Tongue-tied, the Pharisees went home in a subdued, bruised ego after failing that conscience test and succumbing to a superior battle of wits.

    Which leads us to the saying that hypocrisy is setting for others the standards you won’t embrace in the world of infinite protection of self-interest while also hurting the interests of others.

    That again leads us back  to King Henry Tudor of England who was an accomplished Catholic and extremely well-schooled, and who in 1521 published a famous theological thesis  entitled “Defence of Seven Sacraments” in reaction to Martin Luther’s “Ninety-five Theses”, which Henry took a strong view against. Henry’s work was regarded by the Catholic Church as a classic, that Pope Leox even awarded him an ecclesiastical title.

    Yet in a little more than a decade, the same Henry seized the property of the same Catholic Church he defended, dissolved monasteries and establishing himself as the Head of the English Church otherwise called Anglican Protestant Church, all in a bid to legally divorce his wife (Catherine of Aragon) in order to marry another wife who would have for him a son that would inherit the church and its confiscated properties. He succeeded in his hypocrisy of value.

    Hypocrisy of value, which in moral psychology, according to British political philosopher David Runcimab, is the failure to follow one’s own expressed moral rules and principles, and this finds expression in desperate situations bereft of moral suasion, thoughtlessly deployed to achieve selfish motives.

    Hypocrisy is why those who are the architects of Nigeria’s misfortunes are the same people preparing innocent people for the Golgotha to suffer the consequences of the offences they (accusers) committed.

    The proponents of “Endbadgovernance” protests know from the history that any public protests against government’s policy always end up in fatalities, looting and arson. But because they know the motive of their position, they tell us that Nigerians have inalienable rights to protest against unpopular government policies.

    Yet, when it suits them the most, they argue against public demonstration to protest against government policies. It is all a matter of interest even though patriotism is what is most needed for national redemption.

    We saw this in 2020 when the police anti-crime squad, SARS, established to curb criminal activities across the country, turned out to be the arrowhead of criminal gangs terrorising the citizens of the country.

    Nigerians protested against the oppressive mode of operation of the SARS squads. But a section of the country up North refused to join the protest, arguing that the protest was illegal and engineered against President Muhammadu Buhari by the Southern rebellion to sack him from the Aso Rock.

    At a meeting in Kaduna, prominent northern leaders, including top federal government officials, governors, political, traditional and religious leaders, reflected on the state of the nation on the heels of the #EndSARS protests.

    In a communiqué read by the Governor of Plateau State and Chairman of the Northern Governors’ Forum at the time, Simon Lalong, after the meeting, the gathering dismissively referred to the #EndSARS protests as “subversive actions” geared towards “regime change.” Inexplicably, they urged the security agencies to watch the Federal Capital Territory in order to “guard against unwarranted and destructive protests to safeguard critical assets of the nation” according to The Punch report. Conclusively, protest against SARS was declared illegal by the northern leaders.

    Read Also: Protests: Police blast Amnesty over inaccurate casualty figures

    Curious at the meeting was the attendance of top federal officials at the purely sectional and regional meeting.  They included the then President of the Senate, Ahmed Lawan; the Chief of Staff to the President, Ibrahim Gambari, and the Inspector-General of Police, Mohammed Adamu. Also disturbing was their silence on major problems militating again decent living in the North.

    And you now wonder that if their counterparts from the South had taken a cue from them and attended a similar meeting where sentiments and views diametrically opposed to those of the other regions are openly canvassed and promoted, the basis of the unity and oneness of the nation which the Northern leaders canvassed and endorsed at the meeting would have been questionable.

    That was what prompted Southern and Middle Belt Forum to ask: “To where would this country be heading if we had also decided to call our own meeting with our governors and top officials in the federal government?”

    In fact, it is curious that the resolutions of the Kaduna multi-partisan meeting  failed to outline strategic and pragmatic action plans towards addressing the challenges of the region, namely; extreme poverty,  banditry, terrorism, insurgency, malnutrition, almajiri system and illiteracy.

    But reacting to the current endbadgovernance protests, the northern leaders declared in their communique:  “We acknowledge that the primary purpose of any government is to secure life and property, and enhance the welfare of its citizens. Any regime that cannot guarantee these basic rights loses all legal and moral authority of being in power, and would naturally incur the wrath of citizens. It can therefore only remain in office more by default than by public consent.”

    Conclusively, they supported the endbadgovernance protests, which reports indicated had turned violent with many losing their lives while looting and arson were widespread.

    It is gratifying, however, that five socio-political groups in the 19 Northern states composed mainly young elements in the North accepted the Federal Government’s offer of dialogue as a way to find solution to the nation’s problems.

    It is curious that while these young people in the North opted for dialogue to ensure that Nigeria does not slide into the anarchy as witnessed in Sudan, Somalia. Libya and recently, Kenya, where untamed riots have destroyed the daily life of the citizens and crippled the economy, the elders preferred protests that will end in arson, looting and fatality as we now see in some parts of the country.

    In particular, what is the thrust of the “endbadgovernance” protest against Tinubu if not anger against insecurity, bad governance hunger and cost of food that the northern elites supported while they opposed EndSARS anger against the same ills? It is OK to oppose EndSARS protest to protect Buhari because that protest was “illegal” but the current “endbadgovernance” protest is “legal” to hound out Tinubu who knew nothing about the mishandling of the nation’s economy, including the alleged mortgage of the nation’s crude oil, which is at the heart of the present economic crisis in the country.

    That leads to a moral question on the trajectory of poverty crisis in the country that suffers deprivation in the midst of plenty.

    Tinubu is just 14 months as President that inherited agricultural production sector that cannot feed the citizens as a result of fertilisers subsidy scams, terrorist attacks, kidnappings on the farms, and the mother of them all: the fuel subsidy sleaze.

    We witnessed the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) and its devaluation of the naira component when the ruling military elites and their agents swooped on the Central Bank’s vaults to divert the nation’s foreign currency earnings from investment, manufacturing and industrial drive to trading posts in the bureau de change outlets and ubiquitous mushroom finance houses where Nigeria’s foreign currency earnings were being traded like Tom Tom and suya; thus defeating the investment in production drive that informed the structural adjustment programme in the first place. Other development schemes were also botched by the irresponsible military regimes in the country.

    Definitely, the spiral effects of these failings on the present crisis should not be blamed on a man who is just 14 months in office, but who is now being made to carry the can of the inadequacies of the past administrations.

    It is the height of hypocrisy to blame Tinubu for the failings of his predecessors who operated in a clement economic climate but wasted all the opportunities to grow Nigeria to a prosperous nation. It is callous to start scapegoating and plotting the downfall of a man who has the courage to face the nation’s challenges to save the poor from the stranglehold of the leaders whose pastime is milking the nation to her marrow while the citizens die in penury.

    It is only national spirit that can heal the economic wounds inflicted by the past leaders. It is not hypocrisy that will address the present challenges not caused by the present leadership. Nigeria is bound to a collective, national identity and destiny. Definitely, sectional solidarity is a threat to any effort that can bail Nigeria out of her present pitiable economic condition.

    The northern youths’ alliance has set the pace for national salvation to defeat the hypocrisy of the leaders with two faces of a Janus. Let sincerity and nationalism govern our conducts in making Nigeria a great nation.

    •Olujobi, a journalist and Commissioner in Ekiti State Local Government Service Commission, writes from Ado-Ekiti.