Tag: report

  • ‘Land Use Planning Report’ll ease land use’

    ‘Land Use Planning Report’ll ease land use’

    The President, Nigerian Institute of Town Planners (NITP), Dr Femi Olomola, has assured that the Land Use Planning Report (LUPAR) will expand Site Analysis Report (SAR) applications.

    He spoke during the institute’s 17th Mandatory Continuing Professional Development Programme (MCPDP) in Kaduna, Kaduna State.

    The forum had as a theme: “Development of a Multi-User Template for Land Use Planning and Analysis Reporting (LUPAR) in Nigeria.”

    He said the initiative, conceived by his administration, would build on the SAR’s processes and procedures, add references and other information on buildings, title deeds, the local land use and development, and permits on property.

    According to town planners, the new LUPAR format, in addition to other benefits, can become a useful and authentic instrument that supports applications for opening of corporate bank accounts, process bank loans, make requests for insurance cover, and incorporate/register new companies with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).

    Besides, it would address the applications for building plan approvals/permits, issuance of certificates of occupancies (C-of-Os), and value to security and regulatory agencies, among others.

    “With LUPAR, it is hoped that 95 per cent of all problems related to lack of data, inadequate personnel and stress on development control will be significantly addressed. This shall lead to situations where our colleagues in government can now rely on LUPAR as a companion in their decision making processes. A combination of two or three LUPARs in the same neighbourhood will, if carefully joined together, provide an updated base map of the neighbourhood at zero cost to the Town Planning Authority,” Olomola explained.

    He added that the expanded areas of its application cut across various sectors of the economy, many of which have relevance to the financial sector and regulatory agencies.

    He said the MCPDP was aimed at building consensus on the new template among the practitioners and to allow for input before the report will be presented in October.

    He said a draft of the report would be ready before the institute’s national conference and yearly general meeting in October in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital.

    “Be rest assured that a draft of the LUPAR will be prepared and made available in time for our next conference in Ilorin in October. All suggestions bothering comments, observations and corrections made during this MCPDP and the previous ones in Port Harcourt and Ibadan will between now and October be looked into and possibly adopted so that will have a robust LUPAR that we will present to a full house of the NITP in Ilorin,” Olomola said.

    Kaduna State Chapter Chairman, NITP, Muhammad Lawal Ubale,  said the state has been fortunate since its inception in having plans for its development.

    He recalled: “The first plan was drawn in 1913. The Kaduna master plan was prepared in 1967 to cover the planning period from 1961 to 2017. In 2010, the master plan was reviewed and Kaduna Spatial Development Framework was prepared for a planning period from 2010 to 2050. You may also wish to know that Kaduna became the administrative capital of Northern Nigeria from 1917 to 1959. It became the regional headquarters of Northern Nigeria from 1960 to 1966. In 1969, Kaduna became the capital North Central State up to 1975. Kaduna also became the capital of old Kaduna State which included the present Katsina State.

  • The Report  makes a  debut

    The Report makes a debut

    EMERGING men’s wear fashion label, DAMSCO by Damilola Otufodunrin, has presented its debut collection, The Report.

    This particular collection was majorly inspired by his father’s profession.

    “I grew up in a home filled with newspapers. It is no surprise that my mind was focused on a newspaper print fabric while preparing for this collection.

    Damilola
    Damilola

    “The Report aims at achieving two things: first, reporting that DAMSCO has come to stay as a men’s wear fashion brand and second, helping the non-adventurous fashion lover to stay within the confines of what he perceives to be the safest colours, white and black,” Damilola said.

    Damilola, a graduate of History and Strategic Studies from the University of Lagos, is an extreme lover of arts. He started out as a fashion illustrator and later established himself more as a designer with focus on men’s wear.

    His ultimate aim is to be able to produce ready-to-wear men’s wear that would match international standard and raise the bar of the Nigerian fashion industry as an integral part of Africa’s economic growth.

    Damilola hails from Ogun State.

  • ‘Land Use Planning Report’ll ease land use’

    ‘Land Use Planning Report’ll ease land use’

    The President, Nigerian Institute of Town Planners (NITP), Dr Femi Olomola, has assured that the Land Use Planning Report (LUPAR) will expand Site Analysis Report (SAR) applications.

    He spoke during the institute’s 17th Mandatory Continuing Professional Development Programme (MCPDP) in Kaduna, Kaduna State.

    The forum had as a theme: “Development of a Multi-User Template for Land Use Planning and Analysis Reporting (LUPAR) in Nigeria.”

    He said the initiative, conceived by his administration, would build on the SAR’s processes and procedures, add references and other information on buildings, title deeds, the local land use and development, and permits on property.

    According to town planners, the new LUPAR format, in addition to other benefits, can become a useful and authentic instrument that supports applications for opening of corporate bank accounts, process bank loans, make requests for insurance cover, and incorporate/register new companies with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).

    Besides, it would address the applications for building plan approvals/permits, issuance of certificates of occupancies (C-of-Os), and value to security and regulatory agencies, among others.

    “With LUPAR, it is hoped that 95 per cent of all problems related to lack of data, inadequate personnel and stress on development control will be significantly addressed. This shall lead to situations where our colleagues in government can now rely on LUPAR as a companion in their decision making processes. A combination of two or three LUPARs in the same neighbourhood will, if carefully joined together, provide an updated base map of the neighbourhood at zero cost to the Town Planning Authority,” Olomola explained.

    He added that the expanded areas of its application cut across various sectors of the economy, many of which have relevance to the financial sector and regulatory agencies.

    He said the MCPDP was aimed at building consensus on the new template among the practitioners and to allow for input before the report will be presented in October.

    He said a draft of the report would be ready before the institute’s national conference and yearly general meeting in October in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital.

    “Be rest assured that a draft of the LUPAR will be prepared and made available in time for our next conference in Ilorin in October. All suggestions bothering comments, observations and corrections made during this MCPDP and the previous ones in Port Harcourt and Ibadan will between now and October be looked into and possibly adopted so that will have a robust LUPAR that we will present to a full house of the NITP in Ilorin,” Olomola said.

    Kaduna State Chapter Chairman, NITP, Muhammad Lawal Ubale,  said the state has been fortunate since its inception in having plans for its development.

    He recalled: “The first plan was drawn in 1913. The Kaduna master plan was prepared in 1967 to cover the planning period from 1961 to 2017. In 2010, the master plan was reviewed and Kaduna Spatial Development Framework was prepared for a planning period from 2010 to 2050. You may also wish to know that Kaduna became the administrative capital of Northern Nigeria from 1917 to 1959. It became the regional headquarters of Northern Nigeria from 1960 to 1966. In 1969, Kaduna became the capital North Central State up to 1975. Kaduna also became the capital of old Kaduna State which included the present Katsina State.

    ‘’Finally, Kaduna became capital of the Kaduna State from 1989 to date. The experience of Kaduna as a regional capital and the role it is playing in Northern Nigeria and Nigeria in general cannot be overemphasised.”

  • Lawyers seek release of report of investigation

    Lawyers seek release of report of investigation

    •Fault PDP, Fayose’s attack on DSS

    Lawyers in Abuja have requested the Department of State Service (DSS) to make public the report of the search conducted by its men on one of the guest houses of the Akwa Ibom State Government in Uyo.

    The lawyer, under the aegis of Akwa Ibom Lawyers Forum, said releasing the investigation report would end the doubt over the DSS true intention.

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Governor Ayo Fayose of Ekiti State accused the DSS on Friday, of unlawfully invading Akwa Ibom State Government House.

    The group, led by Leo Ekpeyong, made its position known in Abuja on Saturday. The lawyers condemned “the incessant attacks by the PDP on the DSS for performing its statutory responsibilities.”

    Ekpeyong said the group’s findings showed that the DSS did not invade the Akwa Ibom Governor’s official residence, as alleged by the PDP and Fayose, but a guest house of the state government.

    He said release of the search report would shed light on the actual intention of the DSS and what its men found in their investigation.

    “We urge the leadership of the DSS, under the leadership of Mallam Lawal Daura, who has brought professionalism and expertise in the discharge of its duties, to expedite action in the course of this investigation.

    “We urge the leadership of the DSS to complete its investigation speedily and let Nigerians know the outcome.

    “The safety of the life and property of Nigerians cannot be negotiated. We urge the leadership of the DSS to make public the outcome of its investigation so that Nigerians will know the true state of affairs because it is clear that only the guilty are afraid.

    “We condemn, in strong terms, the incessant attacks on the DSS by the PDP.

    “Contrary to false media reports that the DSS invaded the Akwa Ibom Government House, which is the official residence of the Governor of Akwa Ibom State, I make bold to say on behalf of the Akwa Ibom Lawyers’ Forum in Abuja that  the DSS gained access to one of the guest houses of the Akwa Ibom State Government and not the official residence of the governor.

    “This was as a result of the intelligence report of incriminating items found in one of the guest houses of Akwa Ibom State government.

    “I want to say that these incessant attacks by the PDP against the DSS is one too many and it is a calculated attempt to obstruct and impede lawful execution of duties within the purview of the DSS?

    “It must be clear that it is no more news in Nigeria that the security situation is becoming embarrassing to the nation, even in the international community.

    “So every well meaning and patriotic Nigerian should be interested in giving support to security forces to stem the tide of recurring insurgency and insecurity,” Ekpeyong said.

  • N183.7 billion: NDDC faults AGF’s report

    N183.7 billion: NDDC faults AGF’s report

    The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) yesterday faulted the Auditor General of the Federation’s report which claimed that N183.7 billion could not be accounted for by the commission.

    The Auditor-General of the Federation, Mr. Samuel Ukura, told journalists in Abuja after submitting three special reports to the National Assembly that N183.7 billion could not be accounted for between 2008 and 2012 audit years.

    But NDCC’s  Executive Director, Finance and Administration, Dr. Henry Ogiri said the report by the AGF was premature and did not follow the ethical standards of accounting profession.

    Dr. Ogiri questioned the timeliness of the report and its motive, adding that the AGF was only playing to the anti corruption tune of President Muhammadu Buhari by releasing the report.

    He wondered why the AGF had to wait five years to audit the commission’s account, adding that the report, which covered 2008 – 2012, did not fall under the current management of the commission.

    Ogiri,who spoke on Focus Nigeria, a weekly programme on African Independent Television (AIT), described the queries in the report as ‘ridiculous,’ adding  that the commission will respond to the queries raised by the AGF’s report.

    He said: “The report did not conform with ethical practices in the accounting profession. It is premature because it has not gone through the process yet. For a report to be meaningful for whatever reason management or board or government will need to use, it must be specific, it must be measurable, it must be accurate, it must be reliable and it must be timely.

    “A five-year report will not be very reliable and accurate for making decisions in 2015. And so I believe strongly that the Auditor General’s report is out of tune with the ethical profession of accountancy discipline.

    “This is a 307 pages document with so many queries with some of them trivialities. But we are determined to respond to them to show that we are in good faith; we are managers indeed and we will take responsibility for explaining the records as far as the records are available.

    “Can we be able to say for certain about the allegation of extra budgetary allocation from which from his report they actually traced the projects done but that money were spent when budget has not been passed. He has reported that as part of the missing money, N90 billion. His argument in his report is that while these payments were made there was no budget.

    “Let me go to some of the other specifics from which clearly we have replied as well; the N70 billion. Now the auditor general has reported that N70 billion was diverted by that management, not our management. “We have a compendium of projects where advance payment guarantees (APGs) were applied. The total APG value covered by this report is in excess of N70 billion. Of that N70 billion, only N11.7 billion is the amount as at when we concluded our audit, our forensic investigation, from which monies have been paid to  the bank but the contractors are yet to mobilise to site. The N11.7 billion is not missing, it is in the bank. We held a meeting and involved our legal department to write to the contractors to refund the monies if they fail to mobilize to the site.

    “We have started the recovery the money. We have dedicated a special account in Heritage Bank on all recovery of APGs. We are not spending it. These are issues we met on ground. The issue of N70 billion pocketed or diverted or missing is completely out of place even though it was done by previous management. The N70 billion is not missing that I can say with all degree of certainty.

  • NDDC Auditor‘s Report: Matters Arising

    The recent controversial 2008 – 2012 report of the Auditor General of the Federation (AGF) on the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) has thrown up questions of procedure, propriety and due diligence in the overall conduct of the AGF in the matter. Did the AGF follow the normal procedure in the audit process, whereby queries, if any, are first presented to the relevant organisation and responses received before a final report? Is the AGF aware that the NDDC does not write cheques and give same to contractors, but that everything to do with payments is between duly certified contractors and the banks, which must verify the specific details of extent of work before payments? Is it true that banks only make payments after the respective contractors have met the specific and specified requirements for every tranche of payment and that it is the banks, not the NDDC, that must see to this even in their own interest as responsible corporate citizens?  Did the Office of the AGF even take the trouble to ascertain the paradigms governing many of the issues it chose to comment upon, and without recourse to those who could have explained the issues? Fortunately, the Director of Finance and Accounts of the NDDC has put a couple of things in proper perspective.

    Until this audit report of questionable credibility, all news about the Commission was always either about the new approaches of its current leadership to ensure probity, or the commissioning of hitherto abandoned projects. The new school hostels in eight universities was one such intervention that recently took over the media space, in addition to the completion of projects suspended by previous leadership. Road networks rehabilitation and completion in several states have been going hand-in-hand with employment creation and youth empowerment programmes. There are legacy projects, the Partnership for Sustainable Development (PSD) Forum – and much more – under the current leadership. That is why Nigerians must be careful, especially since mischief-makers may use the misinformation and half truths of the audit report to undermine the very impressive strides and reputation of the current focused and hard working NDDDC leadership team.

    The fact that the Report in question covers the period 2008 – 2012, the reading public must make a distinction between the endemic problems of the NDDC long before its current management, and the performance of this current leadership. In fact the Auditor‘s Report is perhaps the best proof that all had not been well with the Commission, until very recently. The period under review by the AGF (2008-2012), recorded a total of almost half a dozen chief executives. This epidemic of Acting Managing Directors and substantive Managing Directors gave the NDDC a total of five Chief Executives between 2008 and 2013, when the current Managing Director assumed office.

    Timi Alaibe was in charge from 2007, until 2009 when P. Z. Aginighan took over. Aginigham was Acting MD from April to August, 2009, when he was replaced by Chibuzo Ugwoha. The latter held forth from August 2009 to September 2011. Then came Mrs Osatohamwen Iyasere-Arenyeka as Acting MD from September 2011 to November of the same year. Dr Chris Oboh was MD from November 2011 to September 2013, when Mrs. Christy Atako took over. The incumbent Managing Director, Bassey Dan-Abia, took over in December 2013 and has a four year tenure that will end in 2017.

    We would only be further disabilising the place if energies are now focused on management change, rather than service delivery, which the current team is doing so well and recording remarkable achievements within the last 18 months.

    As I write, some people are busy right now spreading the falsehood that it was only the Board of the NDDC that was dissolved by the Federal Government. This is incorrect. The decision of the Federal Government to dissolve the Boards of parastatals and agencies affected all Boards. Besides, the Board of an organisation is not the same as its management. It is also important to note that the government’s decision is not a condemnation of the NDDC Board, or any Board for that matter, but an action deemed necessary by the current political dispensation. It is not new. It is also not peculiar to the Government of President Buhari, as a cursory look at our political history from independence, shows that this is part of the national political process in other nations of the world.

    The Federal Government must not be misled into overlooking the fact that the last two years of the Commission‘s life has been the most eventful, in terms of positive impact and a structured reversal of the hitherto prevailing bad reputation of the organization. That is why the ongoing, and clearly sponsored, attempts to smear the NDDC as an institution, and impugn the integrity of its management, should be seen for the campaign of calumny that it is.

    Is it not a matter of public record that the first step taken by the current management after its inauguration was to notify all stakeholders that it needed a calm reassessment of all that had been going on in the NDDC, with a view to ascertaining the number and spread of uncompleted projects? The emphasis has been on completing outstanding projects with measurable impact on the lives of the people, rather than starting new ones. The Dan-Abia team, on inauguration, proceeded on a well-organised retreat and came out with enough information on what had gone wrong and what it needed to do in order to straighten things out. The new helmsman began by taking sure, steady and measured steps. The steps are also in the right direction.

    Being a brilliant, well exposed and experienced hand in his own right, the current MD‘s previous stints in various capacities gave him a certain managerial advantage. That is perhaps why he gave himself the historical role of redefining the profile, reputation and trajectory of this agency of government, while remaining faithful to its raison d‘etre. This commitment to real goals of the Commission has made the new NDDC MD’s approach a major beacon of hope for communities long frustrated by still-born projects that were abandoned by previous managements.

    Instead of taking off on a tangent with emphasis on new contracts, Dan-Abia chose to face real issues. Over time, since assumption of office, the new management has been solving the problems it identified after that initial four-day retreat, the communiqué of which noted “… weaknesses in management systems and procedures, corruption, defects in the organisational structure, disconnect between staff performance and reward system, weak interface between head office and state offices, poor corporate communication culture and in-fighting within the commission.”

    This truth, which the current leadership discovered and is dealing with, is what a lot of people connected with the agency over the years have done everything to deny. The effect of the denial is that all attempts at revamping the NDDC and giving it a new lease of life always failed, because they all began with a denial of the problems. Now that the problems have been properly identified and real work has begun, with the visible increase in the number of ongoing and completed projects across all the NDDC states, the Federal Government under Buhari should simply know that those who wish to distabilise the NDDC, under the mistaken impression that it is a place for free booty, should be made to look elsewhere for such booty and leave the hard working leadership of the Commission alone.

  • Synagogue: Ambode right on coroner’s report

    SIR: The propensity of Nigeria as a nation to do well is an acknowledged fact. The country has everything going for it, or should have. The drawback is the absence of the political will, the needed resolve to do the heavy lifting. Unfortunately, no sense of nationhood is ever going to be achieved without the resolve to do the necessary. This will require that the government does more than just pandering to vested interests of every type and just playing to gallery. This is the definition of leadership.

    This is why the decision of the governor of Lagos State, Akinwunmi Ambode, to enforce the verdict of the coroner’s inquest on the September 12, 2014 Synagogue Church building collapse, is most welcome. It should send out an unambiguous statement that the government will set out parameters under which rules have to be obeyed and enforced. This after all is the basis for the construction of what is generally regarded in conventional wisdom as society.

    The governor stated his resolve in a statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Habib Aruna , that his government would uphold the sanctity of the rule of law in the state, urging residents of the state to also respect the rule of law.

    Ambode said: “The coroner’s verdict of July 7, made a number of recommendations which the state government would act upon accordingly. One of the provisions of the Coroner’s law, 2007, is the provision that empowers a coroner to commence an inquest to find out the cause and manner of death which occur in an unusual manner”.

    There are no pulling of punches here. The government has placed the concept of the acceptance of responsibility by all on the front burner. Ordinarily, the position of Ambode should not warrant any comment. Unfortunately, the prevalence of the abdication of a sense of responsibility has led to the comments becoming newsworthy. The position of Ambode is certainly in alignment with the concept of “change” which was overwhelmingly endorsed by the electorate a few months ago.

    Our own interpretation of “change” is that it represents a yearning, by the electorate for the incorporating of the concept of not just old – fashioned moral values, but in addition, of the very much needed acceptance of the need for social cohesion as a pathway to social solidarity. Hitherto, our repudiation of this has been debilitating. It has led to a society anchored on licentiousness, as well as a pervasive feeling that, well, “anything goes”. This is why the country is mired in perennial underachievement.

    The pervasive manifestation exhibits itself in many hideous ways. For example, how else can one interpret the action of those who carry placards to the effect that those who are perceived to bear vicarious liability for the slaughter of over a hundred innocent souls should be allowed to go scot-free? This is disturbing! Presumably, everyone is free to do as they like which is not on. In the meantime, buildings will continue to implode. They will continue to collapse until the issue of the acceptance of vicarious liability is reinstated. Restitution also has to be made. It also has to be stated that indictment is very much routine. Fortunately under our laws, unlike the French civil law, the presumption of innocence is enshrined. Those under indictment have the means to get eagle-eyed lawyers to get them off the hook. There is therefore no need to carry placards because of an indictment.

    The continuous appeal by the government of Lagos State to the people that they should obey the building codes is commendable. It however also indicates a problem. It need not be so. People should obey the law.

    Governor Ambode’s position is salutary, welcome and timely. In many areas he has started off on the right note. The present intervention should also be supported by everyone. We must have a sense of order in our society; otherwise we will descend into anarchy.

     

    • Ayo Aladesanmi

    Badagry, Lagos.

  • El-Rufai demands report on Zaria water works

    Kaduna State Governor Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai at the weekend directed the contractors handling the multi-billion naira Zaria Water Works to present details of the project to his government.

    He said the project consumed billions of naira, yet it was not completed. He, however, promised that his administration would complete it.

    The governor, who spoke when he visited the project site in Zaria, directed the contractors to present to him its details.

    The non-completion of the project is also responsible for the lack of water in Zaria and the neighbouring seven local governments.

    El-Rufai said: “We are here to see things for ourselves. The Zaria water project has been on for years without producing a drop of water. We must work hard to ensure its completion.

    “We are committed to ensuring efficient and quality service delivery to the eight million people in the state.”

    Reiterating his commitment to the completion of the project, the governor said: “By the power of the almighty God and support of the people, we will break the Zaria water project jinx and bring potable water to Zaria and the neighbouring local governments captured in the project design.

    “We have directed those handling the project to give us details and the progress report. The non-completion is causing hardship for our people. We need to solve the problem.”

     

  • ‘Why National Conference report must be implemented’

    ‘Why National Conference report must be implemented’

    Dr. Rotimi Oladele was a member of the National Conference convened by the immediate past administration last year. In this interview with Musa Odoshimokhe, he highlights the importance of the outcome of the conference and why the present government should implement it. 

    As a member of the National Conference, are you bothered about the fate of the conference recommendations?

    My feeling is that the change that we are ultimately looking for as Nigerians has come, whether we belong to the governing class or those of the governed. The ingredients that will make the change possible are embodied in the report of the conference. It will be the wisest thing, for the new government to look diligently into the report and implement those aspects that have not been overtaken by events. It was a thorough job by people from all walks of life. We disagreed to agree on issues, but I can tell you that the conference was one of the best things that have ever happened to Nigeria. Apart from the way former President Goodluck Jonathan conceded defeat and handed over power, the conference is another plus for him. I want to put it on record that I recognise his contribution to nation building, by establishing that conference and by also conceding defeat. These are the two sides of the coin that I will like to look at in term of nation building.

    Which of the constituencies did you represent at the conference?

    I represented the professional group. I did not belong to any political group or religious interests. I was one of those who represented the professional group. We were after the betterment of the economy. We were concerned about the improvement of Nigeria and for the country to be respected in the comity of nations. We were after Nigeria being self reliance as a nation.

    What would be the implication of not implementing the report by the new administration?

    I believe very sincerely that President Muhammadu Buhari will run his administration with a team and as an individual in a government. I also believe he will listen to the ideas of others. I equally believe he will work with intelligent and patriotic Nigerians. If anybody will jettison the whole content of that national conference report, the person will not be doing this nation any good. I don’t see President Buhari as someone who will do that. I believe sincerely that he may not take everything in the report, but he will take what is good for Nigeria, especially since he has promised us change. He has promised to move this nation forward. He has promised that all that he will do will be to look for what will help Nigeria. Based on the promises he has made during the campaigns and his antecedents, I don’t expect him to throw away the report. If the report is thrown away, anything good that anybody will do to move Nigeria forward would amount to recycling the content of that report. It will be a political manoeuvre to say I did not use the report. But, when you go back to the report, you will find that what was done by such a person would be in the report.

    What were the most important things the report highlighted?

    The report actually addressed a lot of Nigeria’s challenges. And I can tell you that we looked at governance, the future of governance and cost of governance. We looked at education, gender, infrastructure, resource control, political agenda, historical challenges and how to correct them. We looked at religion as a challenge and so many other things. We looked at the economy, transportation, industry and security.

    What are the critical areas you want the new government to focus on?

    For me, President Buhari should not see himself solving all our problems. It should not be a generalist; he should be a selective combatant. He should identify energy, security, education, agriculture and transportation. If he concentrates on these five areas, we would be able to overcome them, I can tell you that this country will be a paradise. And other things will take effect and change naturally. If there is effective transportation system, where we can leave our home and get to work by the next one hour, then there will be adequate use of time which is often being wasted. You will discover that entrepreneurship will grow when the infrastructures are available. I know everybody will be able to engage himself. It is important for us to redesign our education curriculum. We should look at the education that can put food on the table from primary to tertiary levels. We should look at a situation whether a man or woman can have access to his or her rights. So, it is important he knows that he cannot solve all the problems. Under the situation, all the resources that the environment can give the country will be fully developed. This is what I expect from the new government.

    How can the new leader get patriots to work with him to achieve his set goals?

    To get patriot to work with him, first of all President Buhari must assist to de-emphasise the monetisation of politics. We must let the system of getting patriots on board come by ensuring that we are not over pricing political offices and the benefit of the office. People who want to serve the nation, those who have contribution to make, should be the ones that should come forward. It should not be that people who want to make money, people want to milk our country dry, people who want to mortgage our future that seek to hold political offices. It should not be people who want to borrow money that our children and grand children will be paying. Such people should not be encouraged into governance. We just need to de-monetise politics and governance.

    With defectors rushing to the ruling party, there are fears that Nigeria may become a one-party state…       

    It is because the politics we are playing is monetised. They are not playing politics of philosophy, ideology and services. They are only playing politics of stomach infrastructure. The assignment and primary role of the opposition is to find the alternative ways of doing things better than the government in power. This is by putting the party in power on its toes by preventing them from making mistakes and by ensuring they make no mistakes. You pass information to them by way of criticising and not condemning them.

    Today, some states in the country cannot pay their workers. What is the way out?

    This is the reason why the report of the National Conference is important. This issue was debated robustly and the committee that worked on it brought out a very good report. We don’t have reason to even create some states in the first place because they are not viable. They are just drainage pipes; they are just political support instruments. They were created to appease certain people. That is why the conference was looking at a programme, a structure that will give the country structural capability and ability to make the states self-reliant.

  •    National Confab report not enough to endorse Jonathan

       National Confab report not enough to endorse Jonathan

    Chief Niyi Akintola(SAN) is a former deputy speaker, Oyo State House of Assembly and member National Conference. In this interview with ADEBISI ONANUGA, he speaks on the conference and why the Southwest could not present a common agenda, among other issues

    .

    Briefly itemise the demands of the Yoruba at the last National Confer-ence and their current status?

    Let me say that there was no concrete agenda by the Southwesterners before we left for the 2014 National Conference. I am saying this against the backdrop of the fact that we went there as a divided house. Forget about the claim of some people that we had an agenda. There was sectional agenda, no doubt, but we must appreciate that our interests in Yoruba land as at today are not joint but several as it used to be. There was a meeting at Iperu Remo in Ogun State that was supposed to have been attended by credible representatives of the states in the Southwest to aggregate our positions that we will take to the conference. Only Senator Abiola Ajimobi and Dr. Olusegun Mimiko, governors of Oyo and Ondo states were present, out of all the governors in the region. Many of the opinion leaders were absent. Invariably, the credible opinion leaders of the various segments of Yoruba nation were not at that meeting where supposedly the decisions to present the common front were taken. So, by the time we got to Abuja, it was a divided house. Sincerely, we never really got there as a united geo-political zone. Of course, there was a paper that was taken away from Iperu meeting that was meant to be foisted down the throat of every Yoruba man which was resisted.

    As a matter of fact, Governor Ajimobi warned those present at Iperu meeting that they had no mandate to think, speak and take decisions on behalf of the people of Oyo State without consultation and consent of his people. He used the analogy of chief Imams and told them that the mere fact that there were learned scholars in Islam at Ilorin should not qualify one to be imposed as Imam of Ibadanland. He said that certainly, Ibadan people will want to appoint of one of their own as their own Imam, meaning that the fact of having elders sitting at the Iperu meeting does not necessarily means that what was being said there would be acceptable to the elders in Ibadan. In a nutshell, he told them clearly that there must be wide consultations among the people of Yorubaland before any decision was taken. He even reported back to us in Ibadan that his counterpart from Ondo State was not allowed to speak as he was regarded as a small boy who knew very little of Yoruba needs. To that extent, our own mandate from Oyo State was clear and direct. It was to go there and protect the interest of Oyo State and it has nothing to do with party politics or political affiliation. For instance, over 50 percent of the delegates from Oyo State were apolitical. Of the remainders, leaders like Senator Rasheed Ladoja, Brig-General Raji Rasaki, and the likes belong to Accord party and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) respectively. All of us spoke with one voice on what we considered to be the best interest of Oyo State people.

    The situation wasn’t different with the delegates from Ondo, Lagos and Ekiti states. For instance, on the issue of regionalism, the people of Lagos State said Gedegbe leko wa, meaning that they are on their own. Quite unfortunately, we no longer have the likes of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Adekunle Ajasin, Chief Abraham Adesanya, Chief Bola Ige, and co. For example, Ige knew everybody that was somebody in Yorubaland up to Kogi and Kwara States. We don’t have that kind of leaders that have community value across the region again. Things are changing, everybody is becoming a local champion in his own area of birth or influence and we must appreciate that. Take, for instance, the delegates from Ekiti State, led by my teacher, Professor Akin Oyebode, who said that they were not ready to be going to Ibadan to take instruction again.

    But he who understands the political arithmetic of Yorubaland as at today will know that power has even moved away from Ibadan to Lagos. We must accommodate, respect and appreciate our differences, including the changes that are taking place. We had crisis there because we didn’t appreciate our difference and individual state challenges.

    In summary, from what you have said, there was no Yoruba agenda contrary to what is being peddled around?

    There were but there were disagreements along the line. There were also conflicts of interest in the entire Southern part of the country. We had agreement in terms of restructuring but interests were at variant. Take for instance, the issue of Land Use Act. Southwest didn’t buy into the idea of removing Land Use Act which the people of South east and Southsouth wanted. Those of us from Oyo, Osun, and Ekiti states never believed in the Southern solidarity nonsense which they call Southern Solidarity movement because it has not paid the people of Southwest in any form. If there has been any benefit of the movement, the marginalisation of Yoruba wouldn’t have been this pronounced. Not even under Abacha did we have it this bad and rough.

    Today, the financial sector of the country is in the hand of just one ethnic group, so also the power sector of the economy. Unfortunately, when they are trying to satisfy the constitutional requirement by picking one minister from each state, they ensure that they pick only technocrats who have no community value from the Southwest. Though these are highly gifted world class people in their own right and various disciplines and we are very proud of them but they have no political education like their counterpart from the Southeast. If you are in doubt, check the ministries being headed by these Southwesterners and the parastatals under them, compare and contrast these with the ministries being headed by their Southeast counterpart, the parastatals under them and the appointments made therein, the outcome will be too obvious to you. So, what friendship do we have with the Southern Solidarity Movement that is not bothered about our interest apart from using and dumping us?

    Again, some people put up a paper over state creation and they were recommending another state from Ogun State as the only state proposed from the Southwest region when it was thought that only six states would be created. How can anybody who understandS the geographical arithmetic, and knows the political arithmetic of Nigeria and Yoruba land think of creating a state in Yoruba land without mentioning Oyo State first considering the size, population and other criteria? That is another area of disagreement. Ondo State does not agree with most of the things that emanated from Iperu axis because they have their own interest to protect. So, we didn’t really aggregate our interest before leaving for the confab but we all believe in restructuring the country.

    Along what line?

    Along the independence of each state, devolution of power and parliamentary system. The people from the Iperu meeting came there with regionalism and parliamentary system which delegates from Oyo, Ogun and Osun keyed into but which Ondo and Lagos states didn’t believe in. Ekiti was in between.

    What is the status of regionalism?

    It failed.

    So, what did Yoruba bring back from the confab?

    Of all the Yoruba states, Ondo State was the most prepared but generally, we didn’t have that cohesive front. There were those that wanted us to toe the line of South South people which some of us resisted. Our position from Oyo State which Lagos State supported was that if you want resource control whole sale, it must be all embracing. It must include tax, VAT, charges from the ports, and collections from the borders, which some people were not comfortable with.

    What was the outcome of the resource control?

    Stalemate. It did not scale through. The status quo remains. We didn’t get parliamentary system, and full decentralisation. State police scaled through. We also have decentralisation of the court system where we recommended creation of state Court of Appeal. Local government should not be a tier of government in a federal state. The type of what we are having today was a creation of the military. That is why we have a state with 42 local governments as against another with more population having 20.We liberalised it. A state can create as many as 1000 if it can sustain them. If the recommendation is implemented, this country will not remain the same. It will improve greatly. The issue of corruption was tackled headlong. We are having so much at the centre which everybody is scrambling for. Statistics shows that over 80 percent of the landed property in Abuja belongs to the civil servants. In fighting corruption, we have concentrated so much on political exposed persons without looking the way of civil servants that are the source and master minds of corruption. We have had a situation in this country where N20billion was found in the account of an NYSC director who died in a plane crashAmerica and Europe are saturated with the houses of your generals, serving and retired.

    What was the level of success of the conference?

    I will say we achieved between 55 and 60 percent in relation to Yoruba demands and it is not correct to say that we didn’t achieve anything.

    How do you juxtapose your rating with the position of Afenifere, using the implementation of the confab’s report to endorse Jonathan on behalf of the Yoruba?

    Give it to Mimiko. As for the confab, he was the most proactive governor from the region. Mimiko knows and goes for what he wants as a pragmatic man. But I disagree with him for using the confab as a yardstick to endorse one presidential candidate over the other. We should not forget that in 2011, we were railroaded into voting for Jonathan without any demand. I am guilty of it too. We canvassed for him without a charter of demand placed before him unlike our Southeast counterpart, who was more than represented at the federal level. Southeast has Secretary to the Federal Government who coordinates practically all the appointments to the parastatals. Southwest was short changed down the line in terms of appointments. Look at the financial sector, Minister of Finance, and virtually all the heads of parastatals under the ministry go to the East just as it happens in the power sector. Every institution that works today was established by a Yoruba man. For instance, television was first established by a Yoruba man and they took it away from us, ensuring that no Yoruba man gets there, until I made it an issue at the plenary session of the confab after which Sola Omole was appointed to head NTA. BPE was the brain child of Kekere Ekun. They used and dumped him after establishing it. Uncle Fola Adeola was the man who wrote paper on pension, Pension Board has now become the drain pipe which they siphone our money, hardly can we find a Yoruba man there today. In fact, Onagoruwa was removed unceremoniously as DG. Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC) was the brain child of Wole Soyinka. It was established only for Oyo State. I don’t know anywhere in the world where Road Safety issues licenses and plate numbers except in Nigeria. We are not asking for too much. We are only asking our compatriots across the country to allow us to do our own things in our own way and they are denying us. Take for instance, if the dream of our forefathers about Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) was allowed to materialise, we would have been at par with China today. Imagine if Mathematics is being taught in Yoruba Language. In 1982/83, we were to have metroline even before South Africa; it was scuttled by the General Muhammadu Buhari regime. If not for the resilience and pragmatics approaches to infrastructural development in Lagos by Tinubu and Fashola, we would not have that bridge across the Lagoon that links Admiralty Way and Victoria Island and the 10 lanes road to Badagry. We wouldn’t have heard Lekki today because some people somewhere did everything to frustrate those projects hiding under federal might. In fact, at a stage, a minister came from Abuja to stop Lagos-Badagry project.                                                                                                                    I don’t believe that having the Speaker would have improved our lot. No, it doesn’t follow. Bankole was a speaker; the road leading to his home town was not tarred. Olubunmi Etteh was a speaker, her home town, Ikire, had a gully that was killing people every day. The roads are still bad there. It doesn’t follow, it depends on the personality. That was why I advocated the inclusion of technocrats that have community value. Technocrats like Okonjo-Iweala, not a technocrat that is out of touch with his own people. Look at the financial sector, SURE-P, CBN, budget and planning, Stock Exchange, and Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), they are filled with easterners. That we are not well represented in the government shows that we are not as political literate as our people from other zones.  It is very sad that we don’t have leaders to coordinate us like our brothers from the East. Of recent, there were altercations between former CBN governor, Charles Soludo and Okonjo-Iweala, the people that matter in that region came in and said look, the two of you should stop the altercations and we never heard anything from them again. No leaders and no media to defend Yoruba interest again. Before, Tribune used to do that but it has abandoned that role unlike what the Sun Newspaper is doing for the East. Do you know that the MD of Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency, is more prosperous, three times than a governor or a minister?  All l have been saying is that the Yoruba in government must draw a line between their political interest and the interest of their people back home. They should stop behaving as if they have all the solution to Nigeria’s problems. They should start behaving like their counterparts from other zones.

     How do you see the roles of the monarchs in this dispensation?

    We have passed through this route before. The Yoruba monarchs have a lot of issues. Some of them don’t see eye to eye. A lot of ego issues. Of course, some of them are pragmatic, highly cerebral and well informed. They need to appreciate and respect each other’s differences. Most of the obas take decisions to spite each others. In any case, how many of them have community value? When you talk of traditional rulers that have community value, Awujale is a deity that every Ijebu person obeys, respect, adore and he doesn’t do anything without consulting his people. Alaafin is on ground “gidigba” among his people up to Oke Ogun. And Olubadan is surrounded by the elites called the CCII, who call the shots. But when you have a republican oba that is highly republican but doesn’t have the followership, then you will appreciate the Yoruba monarchical challenges. Our society is a bundle of contradictions and is characterised by illiteracy: be it political illiterate, economic illiterate, social illiterate, and legal illiterates. That is why you find supposedly educated person but a legal illiterate saying somebody without a university degree should not contest when constitution ordinarily requires aspirant to be educated up to, not necessarily need to pass the exam or produce the certificate.

     Are you still maintaining your position about the Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC) that they are one of the forces that can protect the Yoruba? 

    I respected the then OPC as it was. You will recall that the respect and the encouragement we gave the body during the years of the locust otherwise known as Abacha era. The OPC then was not exposed to the lure of political patronages. The OPC then was highly principled, focused on the ideology of Yoruba nation, and believed in the concept of “Omoluabi”. The OPC of today is not the same as the OPC of the yore. The present day OPC is factionalised. The leadership has tasted the forbidden fruit and the body is now the OPC of anything goes. It is my prayer that the body will retrace its step to the path of honour and gain the respect it commands among various Yoruba national among Nigerians extraction irrespective of their political lineage and ideology. The recent happening among the ranks and files is very saddening and no Yoruba man of impeccable character should be proud of the development. The fault really did not emanate solely from the leadership of the body but rather the blame should be put at the door step of Yoruba political elites whom on gaining political ascendancy with political power, money and influence started inciting the OPC members and indeed erstwhile benefactors started treating them like lepers. This ingratitude on the part of most Yoruba political office holders infuriated the leadership of OPC. Frustration now set in and the leadership, to have it back on this political office holders, seceded to depart from the path of “Omoluabi”, which was the set goal of the movement at its inception.  It is rather unfortunate that most of the political office holders turned out to be ingrate and forgot where they were coming fromThey started maligning friends at the expense of the older ones thereby turning many former friends into sworn enemies and the resultant effect is what we are now witnessing in Yorubaland. It is simply a matter of failed leadership at all levels.

    What is your advice to the people of the Southwest?

    Yoruba should stop playing God over the affairs of Nigeria. I think it is time Yoruba people start behaving like their counter parts from other zones who will sacrifice anything for the common people of their region. We should not go to vote blind folded. We should play the game the way it is being played by other zones because we can’t be the only sane person in the midst of six mad people or the only virgin in the maternity ward. Again, we should learn to talk less and stop revealing our strength and wining strategy until when it is right to so do. For those that do the dirty jobs, they should appreciate the fact that there is a thin line between honour and dishonour in Yorubaland and once you cross it, you are a goner. If anyone is in doubt, he should go and learn from those that went against the wishes of Yoruba nation during the Abacha regime. The people concerned are still fighting the battle of their lives for relevance. My brothers and kinsmen, Governor Ayodele Fayose and Femi Fani-Kayode should thread softly in carrying out their national assignments. They have the right to hold different opinions from that of their compatriots, but they should thread softly in carrying out their assignments and pursue same within the concept of “Omoluabi”. They should stop selling their kinsmen cheaply because they may not be able to buy them back at a very high price.

    With the way things are, the marriage between the South and the North seems not to be working. Why is it difficult to divorce?

    My brother, the life span of Nigeria is not up to 20 years unless we change our ways. Except there is total devolution of power, and decentralisation of powers, the marriage will collapse. It is not the question of marriage between the North and the South, even among the Southerners, there is injustice, and lack of respect for each other differences. The problem of Nigeria is not caused by the North but rather it was caused by the structure which we are operating at present. There is too much injustice and where there is injustice, there can’t be peace. Unfortunately, our political leaders don’t read. It was over centralisation that killed the old Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Sudan. It is over centralisation that is killing Britain, even the state of Texas is asking for its marriage to be dissolved in USA.

    At every slightest opportunity, you say that you can’t contest election. Why?

    Yes, for now l can’t. Apart from the fact that I don’t have enough money for such venture, I am too blunt even against myself. I am a realist. I believe in what it is as against what ought to be. Many elites out there are living in self-denial and they play the ostrich most of the time. For instance, most of those who fraternised and benefited immensely from Alhaji Lamidi Adedibu, General Olusegun Obasanjo and Asiwaju Ahmed Tinubu are now turning out to fight the same system that brought them to limelight. The question is: why must you smell something you can’t swallow? When you are benefiting from the system, you are not asking questions only for you to cry blue murder when the same method is being used to shortchange you. I hope I have answered your question.