Tag: Soyinka

  • Soyinka: nomads cannot place  themselves above the law

    Soyinka: nomads cannot place themselves above the law

    On Wednesday, Nobel Laureate Prof Wole Soyinka gave an address titled “The killing culture of the neo-nomadic” to the National Conference on Culture and Tourism. His conclusion is that herdsmen cannot be above the law. Below is his full address: 

    Culture is closely intertwined with tourism – the former, in fact, often drives the latter. The destination uppermost in the minds of most tourists we know is  – Culture. This means that both share friends and – enemies. Of the principal enemies, seeing that we find ourselves within the precincts of governance, I intend to engage your attention in this brief address to just one: Insecurity. That inability of any vacationist to let go completely, relax, submit oneself completely to the offerings of a new environment – the sounds, sights, smells, textures and taste. Of Culture itself, in and or out of the touristic intent, there is no ambiguity in the mind of its enemies. They make no bones about their detestation – call them Taliban, Daesh or Isis, al Shabbab or Boko Haram. Their hatred is pathological and impassioned to a degree that goes beyond the pale, beyond insanity and sadly beyond cure. The duty of governance towards such retrogressive outbreaks remains unambiguous.

    After Boko Haram, what next?  In fact, at this moment, Boko Haram has no ‘after’ since it is by no means ended, no matter what technical expressions such as “militarily degraded’ means. But let us assume indeed that we are already in the past of Boko Haram. It is now clear that the succession is already decided, the ‘vacated’ space is already conceded, and that the new territorial aspirants are already securely positioned. The entire nation appears to be theirs without a struggle, and the continuity of an established Nigerian necropolis north to south and east to west is being consolidated.

    Some necropoles are actually architecturally fascinating. They attract visitors from distant places, but those are works of veneration, artistry and dedication. They are visual feasts, among whose structures the visitors actually picnic, leave flowers and symbolic gifts to hovering ancestors. Latin America is full of them. The Nigerian widening necropoles leave only the taste of bile in the mouth, the corrosion of hate, stench and rage.

    When I read a short while ago, the Presidential assurance to this nation that the current homicidal escalation between the cattle prowlers and farming communities would soon be over, I felt mortified. He had the solution, he said. Cattle ranches were being set up, and in another 18 months, rustlings, destruction of livelihood and killings from herdsmen would be ‘a thing of the past’.  Eighteen months, he assured the nation. I believe his Minister of Agriculture echoed that later, but with a less dispiriting time schema. Neither, however, could be considered a message of solace and reassurance for the ordinary Nigerian farmer and the lengthening cast of victims, much less to an intending tourist to the Forest Retreat of Tinana in the Rivers, the Ikogosi Springs or the moslem architectural heritage of the ancient city of Kano. In any case, the external tourists have less hazardous options.

    However, there is also internal tourism, to be considered a premium asset – both economically and in spirit of nation building and personal edification. This was an exercise I indulged in in the early sixties as by-product of other engagements, such as research. A lot however was simply under curiosity. I can claim modestly claim to be among the top twenty-five percent internally traveled Nigerians, acquainted with the smells, textures and tastes of their geographical habitation. I wish the late Segun Olusola were around to testify to the sudden bouts of tourist explorations we made in his Volkswagen Beetle in the pre-war sixties.

    But now, would the young adventurous set out to visit the mystery caves of Anambra and its alleged curative pools from mere interest? They would think twice about it. It is not merely arbitrary violence that reigns across the nation but total, undis-puted impunity. Impunity evolves and becomes integrated in conduct when crime occurs and no legal, logical and moral response is offered. I have yet to hear this government articulate a firm policy of non-tolerance for the serial massacres have become the nation’s identification stamp.  I have not heard an order given that any cattle herders caught with sophisticated firearms be instantly disarmed, arrested, placed on trial, and his cattle confiscated. The nation is treated to an eighteen-month optimistic plan which, to make matters worse, smacks of abject appeasement and encouragement of violence on innocents. Let me repeat, and of course I only ask to be corrected if wrong: I have yet to encounter a terse, rigorous, soldierly and uncompromising language from this leadership, one that threatens a response to this unconscionable blood-letting that would make even Boko Haram repudiate its founding clerics.

    It is now close to a year since I attempted to utilise the Open Forum platform of the Centre for Culture and International Understanding, Oshogbo, to launch a national debate on the topic  –  SACRED COWS OR SACRED RIGHTS. The signs were already clear and the rampage of impunity was already manifesting a cultic intensity of alarming proportions. For reasons which are too distasteful to go into here, the forum did not take place. We were already agreed that General Buhari be invited to give a keynote address, based on his long experience in such matters as former head of state, and as a cattle rearer himself who might be able to penetrate the mentality of this ‘post-Boko Haram’ pestilence’. That challenge remains open, but should now involve this gathering, which surely includes tourist and educational agencies. They should join hands with human rights organisations, the Ministry of Agriculture, Farming and local Vigilante associations etc. It is a gauntlet thrown down to be picked up, and urgently, by any of the affected or troubled sectors of society, or indeed any capable and interested party at this conference. The CBCIU is prepared to collaborate.

    Let me narrate a personal experience – just one among many – that was brought home to me, right against my doorstep. Before that specific happening, I had observed a change of quality in forest encounters with cattle herdsmen over the years. These changes had become sufficiently alarming for me to arrange meetings with a few governors and, later, with the late National Security Adviser General Azazi. At the time, we thought that they were Boko Haram, infiltrating into the south under guise of cattle herding. That was then, and of course that surmise has never been firmly proven or disproved.

    Recently however, I returned from a trip outside the country about to find that my home ground had been invaded, and a brand-new “Appian way” sliced through my sanctuary. That ‘motorable’ path was made by the hoofed invaders. Both the improvised entry and exit are now blocked, but interested journalists are invited to visit. In over two decades of living in that ecological preserve, no such intrusion had ever occurred.

    I have no idea whether they were Fulani or Futa Jalon herdsmen but, they were cattle herders, and they had cut a crude swathe through my private grounds. I made enquiries and sent alerts around, including through the Baale of our neighborhood village. There has been no repeat, and hopefully it will remain the first and last of such invasion. What it portends however is for all thinking citizens to reflect upon, and take concerted measures against.

    Herdsmen, let us appreciate, are perhaps humanity’s earliest known tourists. They must be taught however that there is a culture of settlement, and learn to seek accommodation with settled hosts wherever encountered. The leadership of any society cannot stand idly and offer solutions that implicitly deem the massacres of innocents mere incidents on the way to that learning school. For every crime, there is a punishment, for every violation, there must be restitution. The nomads of the world cannot place themselves above the law of settled humanity.

  • Kenyan Airways flies Soyinka’s ‘Ake’ to Cannes

    THE film adaptation of Prof Wole Soyinka’s childhood memoir, Ake, published in 1981, will be screened in Cannes at the ongoing Festival International du Film Pan Africain de Cannes, which opens today.

    Also, the French translation of the film has been undertaken by Alliance Francaise in Nigeria to pave way for a wider participation by the film’s French audience in Cannes.

    Last Monday, Kenyan Airways also announced its partnership with Ake film. The partnership is aimed at helping to transport the film and its team to as many destinations in recognition of the film’s importance as a vital export item for the African continent.

    In a statement by Diran Oloyede of the airline’s corporate department, an airline of Kenyan Airways’ stature is the right carrier for a film of Ake’s calibre that needs to get to as many places on the globe.

    “We are Africa’s star carrier and even though we touch different key destinations globally, our core market is Africa. That is why it is our strategic priority to grow African business,” Oloyede said.

    The film scheduled for worldwide release in 2016 was shown to cast, crew and friends on December 3, 2015 at Muson Centre’ s Agip Hall, Lagos and was well attended by figures in entertainment, government, the diplomatic community and the corporate world.

    Ake, Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka’s childhood memoir  achieved immediate critical and international acclaim. It has been read by millions of people across the globe.

    Set in World War 2 years, between 1937 and 1945, it covers the first eleven years of the author’s life in Ake, Abeokuta.

    Dapo Adeniyi, Executive Producer and director of the film says the screening of the film in Cannes is only the beginning. The film will soon reach its audience in Nigeria, Africa and the world. Press accreditations and festival passes are available at Novotel Cannes Montfleurys.

  • Group backs Ambode’s choice of Soyinka

    Group backs Ambode’s choice of Soyinka

    A group, Coalition of Ibile Professionals, yesterday supported the choice of Nobel laureate Prof Wole Soyinka as co-chair of the Lagos at 50 Celebration Committee.

    The group in a statement by its General Secretary, Wasiu Hassan, described members of Eko Foundation, as “rabble-rousers and noise makers seeking cheap publicity and attention for relevance”.

    Eko Foundation had last weekend criticised Governor Akinwunmi Ambode’s choice of Soyinka to head the Committee.

    Hassan said Lagos State is made up of five divisions -Ikeja, Badagry, Ikorodu, Lagos Island and Epe- adding that all the divisions are relevant for the state’s progress.

    He lampooned insinuation that indigenes had been marginalised just because some Eko Foundation members, who are exclusively from the Lagos Island division, have lost out in the search for appointment.

    “We should be grateful for having Chief Rasheed Gbadamosi and Prof Soyinka appointed by a governor who has recognised their qualities to add glamour and depth to an international event for celebration of a cosmopolitan city such as Lagos.

    “Eko Foundation should purge themselves of their base and narrow sentiments if they expect to be taken seriously. Enough is enough,” Hassan said.

     

  • Soyinka, Nietzsche and Odia Ofeimun’s quest for Ogun (2)

    Soyinka, Nietzsche and Odia Ofeimun’s quest for Ogun (2)

    In the first essay in Odia Ofeimun’s book, ‘In Search of Ogun: Soyinka in spite of Nietzsche’, discussed last week, the poet and essayist, Odia Ofeimun, undertook through a critical analysis of the works of Wole Soyinka his quest for Ogun. We interpreted this as part of a wider and deeper search to rediscover the indigenous spiritual, cultural and knowledge systems that had been largely eroded, discredited and distorted by the violent contact with foreign cultures, values and exploitative economic systems. His second essay in the book, ‘Wole Soyinka: The Writer as Cultural Hero’ was delivered at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, to commemorate Soyinka’s 70th birthday. Perhaps because he delivered the lecture at a foremost citadel of learning named after Awolowo, Ofeimun chose to compare and contrast the similarities and differences of the literary and artistic aesthetics of Soyinka with the political vision, values and ideas of Awolowo. A key factor that emerges from Ofeimun’s discourse is that Awolowo had as much impact on the literary, cultural and artistic terrain particularly of western Nigeria as Soyinka has had on the politics of Nigeria.

    Ironically, the wily ‘Maradona’ of Nigerian politics, General Ibrahim Babaginda, had shortly after coming to power in 1985 described Awolowo, some say patronisingly, as being the main issue in post-independence Nigerian politics. It is difficult to say how the relationship between Awolowo and Babangida would have evolved if the sage had lived longer to see how the military regime was turning out. Soyinka initially agreed to put his expertise at the service of the nation by helping to curb the horrendous loss of lives on our roads as head of a widely acclaimed Federal Roads Safety Corp (FRSC under Babangida). The radical playwright, however, soon became a fierce adversary of the General when his annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election made it obvious that he indeed had no plans to relinquish power to a democratically elected civilian-led administration. But then, as emerges from Ofeimun’s narrative, Soyinka as an impassioned fighter for justice with an instinctual understanding of the dynamics of power and politics, can also be rightly described as a central figure in Nigeria’s political evolution and one of the key shapers of the country’s political history.

    Justifying his decision to focus on these two iconic figures of Nigeria’s artistic and political terrains, respectively, Ofeimun argues that “My tack is simply to relate Soyinka’s performance to the politician who in my view has come closest to being the man of mind and action in Nigerian politics. Described by the journalist, Dan Agbese, of Newswatch and echoed by ex-Biafran leader Odumegwu Ojuwku, as the best President Nigeria never had, Awolowo has a centrality to the national argument which makes him the most consistent reference point for serious engagement with national questions. A lot, I insist, is to be gained by relating Soyinka’s artistic performance to what may be called Awolowo’s politic;l reason”.

    Ofeimun argues that while Soyinka has consistently and easily been the face of the moral opposition to tyranny in post-independence Nigeria, Awolowo has been both the de facto and de jure leader of the political opposition against Nigeria’s tyrannies. The sage’s influence still looms large on the country’s political stage long after his death. Both Awolowo and Soyinka both served unjust prison terms at different times because of their principled commitment to justice, good governance and the rule of law in the face of conscienceless and malevolent civilian and military despotisms. The two men have written copiously on Nigerian politics, society and economy within their respective spheres of the artistic and the political. As Ofeimun graphically puts it: “Soyinka’s two deathless aphorisms: that justice is the first condition of humanity; and that the man dies in all who keep quiet in the face of tyranny can serve as caption for their civic practices. The aphorisms square with Awolowo’s quote that it is not life that matters but the courage you bring into it”.

    Interestingly, Ofeimun takes on the Afrocentric polemicists like Chinweizu and his self-styled ‘Bolekaja’ collaborators who stridently accused writers like Soyinka, J.P.  Clark, Mike Echeruo and Chris Okigbo among others of exhibiting too much Euro modernist influences to the detriment of African culture in their works. According to Ofeimun, “What is African to the troika is not exactly clear from the nebula of representations that they project as a basis for the assault on Euro-modernists. Nor do they address the problem of how one should view those elements that are to be found in the European traditions and the pre-colonial traditions of many societies. Impliedly, they give these elements away as factors of European influence, thus leaving to Africa’s heritage a more constricted room for self-defence against the widening gyre of western hegemony”.

    Of course, it is difficult to disagree with Ofeimun’s critique in this regard. Several studies have demonstrated that Soyinka’s works are deeply influenced by his native Yoruba language and culture. Indeed, he translated Fagunwa’s novel, ‘Ogboju Ode Ninu Igbo Olodumare’ into English (A Forest of A Thosand Daemons) – a feat impossible without deep immersion in and familiarity with Yoruba cosmological universe and idioms. Even then, as Soyinka himself has argued, he does not have to deny other influences on him beyond his Yoruba milieu for the absolutely needless objective of proving his ‘negritude’. Interestingly, there is also, Ofeimun demonstrates, a nexus between Soyinka’s artistic and literary universalism that does not compromise his African cultural authenticity and Awolowo’s own ideas for language and development in the country’s educational policy.

    In Ofeimun’s words, “None of our languages has a proper conversation, through translation, with the European languages that dominate the world’s knowledge industries and airwaves. The consequence is that we are light years away from the dream of one of our founding fathers, Obafemi Awolowo, who set out believing that if education was given to all with speed, we could arrive at a plateau of development upon which all knowledge(s) of the English language would be domesticated in the indigenous languages and all the knowledge(s) in the indigenous languages would be transferred to the English language. What a rounded personality that could have placed at the centre of our national identity”!

    The author demonstrates this thesis when in the last essay on ‘Taking Naija-movies to the next level’, he decides to address his audience of the country’s leading lights in the film industry through the medium of Soyinka’s collection of poems – ‘SAMARKAND And Other Markets I Have Kno­wn’. Now, this is a collection I had mostly had problems deciphering the Nobel laureate’s rather obscure and dense imagery. Yet, in Ofeimun’s presentation, many of them actually became lucid, accessible and a joy to read. The author believes that such works and other classics would actually be more readable and accessible to a wider public only if we had a viable translation industry and critical publishing infrastructure that makes books available in our indigenous languages. Ofeimun certainly raises in this book issues critical to our quest for mental emancipation, cultural liberation and accelerated national development as a people.

  • Soyinka calls for retrieval of Ife antiques

    Soyinka calls for retrieval of Ife antiques

    Professor Wole Soyinka has called on the Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi, the Ojaja II, to accord attention to the retrieval of Ife antiquities and art objects illegally carted away to foreign land, especially the Ori Olokun.

    Speaking recently in Ile-Ife at the declaration of the city as a free tourism zone, Professor Soyinka, who was represented by Professor Wale Adeniran, stated that steps must be taken to ensure that they are not given replicas in place of the original ones.

     

    Nobel laureate: “Some names have been mentioned, names like Emeka Anyaoku, former Secretary General of the Commonwealth; Koffi Annan, former Secretary General of the United Nations; Henry Leegate, a distinguished Africanist at the Yale, who owns a university; Professor Bolanle Awe; Prof Oyayi; Mr Edison Arantes do Nascimento, Pele of Brazil and the representative of the National Commission for Museums and Monuments.”

    He noted that when these artifacts must have been returned to their original home, the pilgrims will never cease to leave Ile-fe with the dynamism, energy, drive and solomonic wisdom of Oba Ogunwusi.

    Soyinka expressed the confidence that this feat can be accomplished.

    He explained that what is happening now at the palace ground is long overdue given the status of Ife as the city of  art and world’s famed tribe of ancient and modern art.

    He observed that it is the belief of many that Ile-Ife is the centre of the world, and that Olodumare has made Otu Ife a focal point of the universe.

    The erudite professor stated further that with the infrastructure being put in place by Oba Ogunwusi, one can foresee an endless procession of pilgrims and tourists continually converging on the ancestral home of Ile-Ife from far and near.

    He commended the efforts of the Kabiesi, stressing that if this is adopted and supported, it will contribute in bringing back the golden days of 1970s when the then University of Ife used to organise the Ife Festival of the Arts which attracted participants from far and near, including the Negritude poet and the then President of Senegal, Léopold Sédar Senghor, who participated in one of such festivals.

    Soyinka maintained that the Obafemi Awolowo University still has a major role to play in strengthening the organisation of the festival of arts by engaging in sustained research into the history of Ile-Ife.

    In the light of this, we have to bring back the programme of the study of archaeology at the undergraduate and post graduate levels, he said.

    Speaking earlier at the event, Oba  Ogunwusi called for a concerted effort to take the continent out of impoverished level of poverty, “because God gave us everything.”

    He said it is important “for us to come together as one happy family and channel the course and make Africa a better place, not only Ile-Ife, not only Osun State, Yoruba land or Nigeria, but the entire Africa.”

    He explained that today our traditional religion is the fastest growing in the world, faster than Christianity, faster than Islam.

    The Ooni maintained that the entire world is moving towards the African traditional religion, while the custodians do not even appreciate it nor value it.

    He disclosed that it is evident that every square metre of Ile-Ife is full of mysteries.

    The Ooni said the alternative we have is to keep all those mysteries that have been existing for million of years or open them to the world for them to know and experience those mysteries.

    “Out of that, we are going to have movement in terms of tourism because any development in life is all about tourism. Movement of slave trade is now our past, but it was a movement at some point because some humans moved all the way from Africa to Europe, South America and other places. Movement brings every other thing. It brings development, prosperity and progress, so we need to focus well on movement in the entire Africa because every part of Africa is full of mysteries and I will start from Ile-ife”, he said.

  • Pyrates not a secret cult,  says Soyinka

    Pyrates not a secret cult, says Soyinka

    Sixty-four years ago, seven students, among them Wole Soyinka, the 1986 Nobel laureate in Literature, founded the first confraternity on a Nigerian university campus. Last February 25, an ex-member of the confraternity and United Kingdom (UK)-based psychiatrist, Dr. Dolapo Sikuade, launched a book: The Theatrical Aesthetics of Wole Soyinka and the Pyrates Confraternity (a critical work on a unique African cultural paradigm) dwelling on  the intricacies of the Pyrates Confraternity and theatre aesthetics, among others. Paul Ade-Adeleye and Oluwatoyin Ajibola   report.

    SIXTY-four years after the National Association of Seadogs (aka Pyrates Confraternity) was founded, one of its founders, Nobel laureate Prof Wole Soyinka, is worried about its misconceptions by Nigerians.

    He is worried because of what he called their ignorance about the association’s objectives. Soyinka chastised the public, which has given the confraternity a bad name and hanged it.  Soyinka wondered why intelligent and knowledgeable Nigerians chose to equate secret cult with the confraternity.

    He said he would continue to bear with pride the ‘’guilt of’’ being a Pyrates, noting that such “guilt is the guilt of the ignorance and the stubbornness of the outer society”.

    “Who wants to rehabilitate the image of what? There is no image that I know of the Pyrates Confraternity, which needs rehabilitating with anybody. If people choose to be ignorant and yet to pronounce on the object of their ignorance, well, who is to blame for that? If a public as intelligent and knowledgeable as we have in Nigeria chooses to equate the description secret cult with the word confraternity, well, whose fault is that? Go back to school and go and learn the difference between secret cult and confraternity. I am saying that many comments that I have heard and read make it very clear that 99 per cent of those who read or speak in public simply do not understand that there is a world of difference between a secret cult and a confraternity or a fraternity. There is a veneer of the cultic in the Pyrates Confraternity but that does not make the Pyrates a secret cult, and even less an evil secret cult,” Soyinka said.

    The Nobel laureate was reacting to a comment by Prof Femi Osofisan on a book titled: The Theatrical Aesthetics of Wole Soyinka and the Pyrates Confraternity by Dolapo Sikuade during the launch of the book at the Nigerian Institute for International Affairs (NIIA), Victoria Island, Lagos.

    Other scholars at the event included renowned poet Prof J. P. Clark-Bekederemo; Prof Ayo Banjo, Prof Emasealu Dr. Olu Agunloye Dr. Tunde Awosanmi; Prince Ifeanyi Onochie, chairman, National Association of Seadogs; Rear Admiral A. Sode (rtd.) and High Chief Babatunde Rahman who represented Oba Adedotun Gbadebo, the Alake of Egbaland.

    According to Osofisan, Sikuade’s narrative is a lofty ambition indeed and his advocacy powerful, intense and warm. Perhaps, he would succeed at last in rehabilitating the image of this unique group in the history and development of not only the university protest tradition, but, indeed, of all radical socio-political movements in general.

    Be that as it may, if he knew what his and six others brainchild would eventually become, would Soyinka have hidden his light under the cover of for the greater good? Whatever the answer may be, he certainly bears, quite dauntlessly, the guilt of the Pyrates Confraternity.

    He said: “The apportioned guilt of the Pyrates Confraternity is permanent, and I should bear it with pride. That guilt is the guilt of the ignorance and the stubbornness of the outer society. So, even after the Pyrates had left the universities, there was still this commitment, this will, this obsession to fasten everything that was done on campus which was wrong to non-existent fraternities; that is, fraternities no longer on campuses.

    Banjo of the University of Ibadan described the author as a renaissance man, saying: “He has crossed the universe from the scientific field of study to humanistic studies of human beings.”

    On the book, he said: “The question of the important nexus between Wole Soyinka’s genius as a playwright and his experience with the Pyrates confraternity is one which intrigues the country as a whole. Unfortunately, there have been quite unnecessary arguments about the nature of this confraternity and one of the things which I think this book has done is to settle that argument finally by showing us the true nature of the Pyrates Confraternity. Dolapo has also brought to the examination of this work his insights from psychiatry, and from his tutelage under Femi Osofisan. He has shown very clearly that the Pyrates Confraternity has very benign orientation and intentions and is in fact a kind of idealistic organisation, which cares about the community.

    Reviewing the book, Prof Emasealu of the Department of Theatre and Film Studies, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, said: “This magnificent work, while acknowledging that a handful of controversial historical accounts of the pirates confraternity exists, chronicles the evolutionary process of the confraternity as well as establishes the socio-cultural, socio-political and intellectual professional limits that propelled the original seven to float the association against the backdrop of the politics of the Yoruba dominated Western region.”

    He noted that the book must not be made to stand trial for ethnic jingoism saying: “However, conscious of the unhealthy relationship among the diverse tribal leanings that constitute the Nigerian nation, the book is quick to exonerate the Pyrates Confraternity from any form of tribal identity even when it encompasses within its activities, the cultural nuance of many tribes.”

    He said the book draws parallels between the writings of such renowned authors, such as Daniel Defoe and Robert Louis Stevenson, and the semiotics of the confraternity. He noted ‘the huge influence, which such colonial narratives had on the holistic narrative and motif disposition of pyrates’.

    Awosanmi of the Department of Theatre Arts, University of Ibadan, noted that pirate literature is favoured for its rich exploration of imagination into the exotic islands of Europe and the Americas. After tracing the development of the sub-genre of pirate literature, as employed by Sikuade in his book as an introduction, he noted that there are more serious connotations to the book than the fascinating texts.

    He added that Sikuade has demonstrated his belief in the supremacy of art as a depository of history over recorded history. He has engaged the exercise of writing the book to demonstrate the task of philosophy in the provision of a critical explanation of not just a cultural representation but a cultural reality thereby emerging as a critical theory of the over 60 years work stand of the National Association of Seadogs, also known as the Pyrates Confraternity.

    Wittily declining to talk about the book, he commented: “I don’t want to talk too much about the book; there are about 376 pages there. I will leave it for critics to say anything about it. Already, they are criticising. The organisation (Pyrates Confraternity) is moving from one form to another. It’s only fitting to chronicle how we used to play in the past.”

  • Ese: don’t mix criminality with religion, say Soyinka, Falana

    Ese: don’t mix criminality with religion, say Soyinka, Falana

    Nobel laureate Prof Wole Soyinka and activist-lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) yesterday condemned the Federal Government’s failure to prosecute Senator Ahmed Yerima who allegedly married an Egyptian girl of 13.

    Soyinka said failure to punish such acts embolden others to engage in them.

    He also faulted attempts to justify Ese Oruru’s abduction and conversion to Islam.

    At a joint briefing in Lagos, Soyinka and Falana said Ese’s abduction was an act of criminality that must not go unpunished.

    Soyinka disagreed with a professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), Ishaq Akintola, who claimed that Islam has no age barrier in marriage.

    “I want to ask him (Akintola), who invoked religion in the first place? What everybody was screaming was that this was a crime, a criminal act. Who brought religion into a purely criminal act? People should be very careful when they speak. They should take care not to worsen an already inexcusable situation by dragging religion into it,” Soyinka said.

    According to the Nobel laureate, specialists in human physiology had declared that at a certain age, a girl-child is not fit for sexual intercourse with “a grizzled, horny adult”.

    “So, who exactly brings religion into issues of governance, of constitution, of law? We’re saying that there’s something higher than the protocols of any religion, and has to be higher simply because those who inhabit this border called Nigeria belong to more than one religion.

    “There has to be a commonality which directs our conduct, which organises our lives. As inadequate as it is, it is the Constitution.

    “For me – I don’t know about you – the welfare of a child is even more important than money that is stolen. You can always retrieve the money, but when you damage a child with a fistula, which ruins a child for life, if you believe in God, you’re committing a crime against God.

    “If you steal money, you commit crime against the circular society, but when you damage a child because of your own depravity, you ruin that child for life, you traumatise that child, so don’t come and tell me that you’re religious and pious.”

    Soyinka noted that during the Yerima child-marriage saga, scholars highlighted tenets from the Quran which proved Yerima wrong.

    “A governor, now senator, boasts that he has a right to marry and consummated a marriage with a 13-year-old, when it’s proven that he actually paid the father who was a driver in Egypt, and we screamed at the time that this was a crime, not only in Nigeria but in a Moslem country – Egypt; that this was cross-border sex trafficking, in addition to flouting the laws of this nation and Egypt.

    “He took the girl from school and then announces his right to consummate the marriage – that his religion permitted him to do so,” Soyinka said.

    According to him, acts of impunity inevitably lead to problems such as Boko Haram.

    “When you invoke religion, there are others who will say: ‘O, you say you are pious, but I am holier than you, therefore I can interpret that same source the way I want to authorise me to kill you, your wife, your brothers, your family; because I say you’re not holy enough and I can prove it.’ That is what happens when we allow people to get away with impunity based on religion.

    “So, let’s take religion out of this. We’re talking about pure criminality and it is my demand, and will always remain my demand, that until you make an example of people like Yerima, there will be thousands of Yunusa, the man who abducted Ese,” Soyinka said.

    Soyinka said demanding justice for Ese does not mean being against Islam.

    “I sympathise with his (Akintola’s) feeling that his religion is under siege. But he should look for other reasons. He shouldn’t try and suggest that people hate Islam. Don’t say that people are Islamophobic. That’s rubbish.

    “We’re against crimes, defined by the Constitution, the legal structure that bind us all together, and we say leave religion out of it. Any religious practice involves a continuous debate. But when we’re talking about crime please don’t diffuse the subject. When we say Yerima should be prosecuted, don’t diffuse it,” Soyinka said.

    He also faulted the idea that it is culturally acceptable to marry under-age girls. According to him, culture changes.

    “Culture is not static. It’s dynamic. It constantly evolves. There are hard-core materials in any culture, but culture itself, especially the practice, in view of greater knowledge, discoveries, even as a result of learning from other cultures, we adopt what we have always considered sacrosanct, because at the bottom of it all, at the heart of it all, culture is about human beings, about humanity.

    “There’s no culture without humanity. It’s human beings who create culture and who are guided by it and who adapt them.

    “So, when I read anything which suggests that a culture is sacrosanct, I just wonder on what planet they are living, because history contradicts this absolutely.”

    Falana said under Section 38 (2) of the 1999 Constitution, no child of school age should be forced to convert to another religion other than his parents’.

    The section says: “No person attending any place of education shall be required to receive religious instruction or to take part in or attend any religious ceremony or observance if such instruction ceremony or observance relates to a religion other than his own, or religion not approved by his parent or guardian.”

    Falana said Ese was attending a school in Bayelsa State when Yunusa allegedly abducted her to Kano State and forcefully converted her to Islam without her parents’ approval.

    “That is a violation of Section 38 of the Constitution,” Falana said.

    Falana noted that Yunusa’s father had spoken out that he warned his son not to bring Ese to Kano, adding that when the Emir learned of it, he directed security agencies to intervene.

    “There is a United Nations convention for the rights of the child. Nigeria as a UN member ratified the convention and domesticated the law in 2003. Since 2003, we have had the Child’s Right Act. Under Section 15 of the Act, every child in Nigeria shall be educated at the expense of the state from primary to junior secondary school.

    “For the avoidance of doubt, in 2004, we also enacted the Compulsory Universal Basic Education Act that has also imposed a duty on the state to ensure that every child is educated from primary to junior secondary school.

    “In fact, under that law, it is a criminal offence not to allow your child to be educated. What Yunusa has done by taking that girl from her school in Yenegoa is a violation of that law.

    “About 24 states have adopted the Child’s Right Act, and under the law, which is applicable in Bayelsa State, what Yunusa did is purely criminal – kidnapping, forced marriage, rape, sexual assault on a girl who was 13 last year. Now she has been put in a family way. You can imagine the danger to the health of that girl.

    “That is why all Nigerians must rise to retrieve all under-age children that have been forced into illegal marriages. We need a national movement against child marriage in our country,” Falana said.

  • Soyinka, Nieetzsche and Odia Ofeimun’s quest for Ogun (1)

    One of Nigeria’s pre-eminent and prolific poetical and literary voices as well as a consummate and often brutally frank public intellectual, Odia Ofeimun, never ceases to surprise with the range of his scholarship, the dazzling dexterity with which he handles a complex diversity of ideas from an array of disciplines and the freshness of his sometimes unorthodox perspectives in his numerous cerebral offerings. His book, ‘In Search of Ogun: Soyinka In Spite of Nietzsche’, published by Hornbill House, Lagos, in 2014, is another veritable, nourishing and provocative intellectual feast. The three essays that make up the 206-page book constitute a breath taking tour de force traversing diverse areas of specialisation ranging from literary theory, history, philosophy, traditional African religion, Nigerian and world history, arts and culture, political science, political theory, music, drama, theatre and much more.

    Students of Wole Soyinka’s works, ideas and politics will inevitably find this book irresistible and indispensable as the Nobel laureate features prominently in the three extended essays. The first two, ‘In search of Ogun – Soyinka, Nietzsche and the Edo century’ as well as ‘Wole Soyinka: The writer as cultural hero’, were delivered as The 2003 Egharevba Memorial Lecture in Benin and the 2004 70th birthday lecture at the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, in commemoration of Soyinka’s 70th birthday, respectively. The third titled ‘The Beauty of Identity: Taking Naija-movies to the next level’, was a discourse on the Nigerian film industry delivered at the Best of the Best-TV event with the theme- The Arts and National Identity. Even then, Soyinka’s poetry, prose and drama offer the prism through which Ofeimun sheds light on his topic.

    The curious question evoked by the title of the first essay is what the author really means by the Edo century. Thus he understandably prequels his lecture with an intriguing excursion into the both heroic and tragic history of the people of his native Edo land. Ofeimun establishes a relation between Ogun Ewuare, king of the Edo Kingdom for 45 years in the 15th century, and Ogun, the fabled god of iron, war, roads and creativity in Yoruba and several other African cultures both on the continent and diaspora. In 1997, the Edo people decided to commemorate the centenary of the Benin massacre, which took place in 1887. In that incident, nine British war ships were deployed to crush and utterly decimate a people who had been deliberately provoked to act in ways to justify the criminal looting and arson unleashed on them. Benin City, the capital of the Edo Kingdom was set ablaze. The reigning monarch, Oba Overamwin, was sent into exile in Calabar marking the end of a dynasty that had lasted over 500 years.

    Ofeimun was aghast that the centenary commemorating what was a tragic moment in the otherwise glorious history of a proud people took the colour more of a celebration than the mourning he thought it ought properly to have been. Was this an approbation of the superiority of British colonial rule over the traditional system it overthrew as well as subsumption or incorporation of Edo land into the macro Nigerian ‘artificial’ entity that was the product of colonial imperialism? A pained Ofeimun writes: “Whether it was a marking or mourning, I found myself taking it very personal. The commemoration appeared to me like a celebration of the British defeat of the Edo people…what was there to ensure that if the colonisers returned today, there would be no routing of indigenous people as happened in 1897?”

    The writer’s angst is understandable. The Edo Kingdom had a pedigree that went back more than a thousand years. Yet, it suffered a devastating defeat at the hands of nine British war ships manned by thugs of foreign trading companies in a matter of days. Ofeimun metaphorically describes the period between the razing and destruction of Benin in 1897 and the centenary commemoration of 1997 as ‘The Edo Century’ just as historians narrate different phases of history as the European, American or Asian century. While he uses Edo as the anchor or peg for his analysis, Ofeimun has his sights really on the larger Nigerian entity arguing that “It makes no difference whether you are talking about the Edo people or the people of Nigeria. The implications of the Edo century are the same on either side of the flowing river of time. The Edo people are Nigerians or Nigerians are just Edo from the logic of a defeated people who have not overcome their defeat”.

    His fervent and rigorous search for Ogun can thus be interpreted at a deeper level as a quest for the rediscovery of indigenous cultural, spiritual and intellectual moorings or resources that will enable African nationals to regain their self- confidence as a basis for recovering psychologically from the humiliations of their colonial past while reviving and strengthening their capacity for genuinely autochthonous development. This is particularly because Ofeimun believes that the cultural and spiritual depredations suffered by African religions, traditions and social systems in their contact with invading religious and values was no less devastating than military and economic subjugation of the continent. In his words “Since the British overran our geographies, we have all failed, and woefully too, at putting up a liveable, countervailing strategy for dealing with, not just rampant imperialism but our own incapacities, our past and the need always to map the future”.

    Odia’s essay is an interdisciplinary voyage into history and myth not for its own sake but with the hope that “by enabling us to engage roots of development that were abandoned at some point in the past, it might tell us something about how to escape the morass of present tense” because “our self- knowledge and general development as a people have been compromised by the inadequacies of our responses to the challenges of western civilization”. In pursuit of this objective, Ofeimun deploys Ogun as his medium although he also exhaustively discusses Sango, Obatala and the indigenous but subverted knowledge systems of diverse African cultures. He undertakes his intellectual quest for Ogun through the works of Soyinka who has consciously and deliberately drawn inspiration from the fount of Ogun. For him, Soyinka “more than any other writer has plumbed deepest to the core issue of enriching an African world view from the defeat of yesterday and extracting such strategies of self-management from it which belongs to our traditional past and can still belong to our future”.

    In this panoramic survey of Soyinka’s literary corpus from the observatory of Ogun, Ofeimun not only gives insights into the Nobel laureate’s prodigious creative output, he also critically interrogates his several intellectual encounters with the dramatic aesthetics of a Femi Osofisan, the radical, Marxist perspectives of a Biodun Jeyifo, the modernist philosophical vision of the Ghanaian thinker, Akwasi Wiredu and the combative Afrocentric trio of Chinweizu, Onwucheka and Madubuike. He draws parallels between the German Philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche’s resort to the gods in Greek mythology to help re-orientate people away from moral distress in a chaotic and anarchic world in which he assumes the death of God, and Soyinka’s seeking a “return to the African gods as a means of healing the severance that had taken place between humankind and the original Oneness”.

    As Ofeimun puts it, “Just as Nietzsche felt free to bend Greek gods to his will Soyinka felt free to bend the Yoruba gods to his will as a way of engaging spheres of experience in which neither science nor Christianity had any explanatory force”. However, one cannot help but wonder at the practical utility of Soyinka’s intellectual experimentations with Ogun mythology when Ofeimun writes that “For Soyinka, Ogun had become a twentieth century deity, who superintended not only over iron foundries that gave rise to modern civilisation but other scientific pursuits, beyond Metallurgy, in electricity, electronics and related fields. In his metaphysics, Ogun is represented as the modal archetype; not a god of either/or but a force capable of either good or evil through whose feats civilisations may be explored, established or dissolved”. How do we contrast this ‘modernising’ conception of Ogun with the protracted technological and other forms of underdevelopment across Africa where the god is most widely worshipped?

  • ‘Soyinka qualified to chair Lagos at 50’

    ‘Soyinka qualified to chair Lagos at 50’

    The Committee for Democracy and Rights of the People (CDRP) has condemned the position of some Lagos indigenes, under the aegis of Eko Foundation, who kicked against the choice of Prof Wole Soyinka as Chairman, Planning Committee of ‘Lagos @ 50’.

    According to the CDRP, that Soyinka is not an indigene of Lagos is not enough reason to diminish the stature of Africa’s first Nobel Prize winner.

    Describing Soyinka as eminently qualified to chair the Lagos@50 committee, the national coordinator of CDRP, Amitolu Shittu, asked Eko Foundation promoters to stop propagating segregation and disunity among the Yoruba.

    He insisted that Soyinka, as one of Yoruba’s biggest brands, is qualified to chairman the committee.

    “The Eko Foundation is propagating segregation and promoting disunity among the Yoruba. It is not only in bad faith, but also in bad taste and an avenue to promote unnecessary rancour.

    “Lagos is within the Yoruba nation. The good work of (the late Obafemi) Awolowo in Yoruba land is unexplainable. His marks are felt all over the Southwest today.”