Tag: STATE POLICE

  • State police will only work for local issues —Senator Abu Ibrahim

    State police will only work for local issues —Senator Abu Ibrahim

    The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Police Affairs, Senator Abu Ibrahim, on Friday said that State Police can only work for local issues like arrest of local thieves and security.

    According to him, national elections and other issues would be beyond State police when created.

    He spoke with State House correspondents after observing Jumat prayer at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Expressing his reservations about the creation of state police, he said: “I have my reasons. I am Chairman, Senate Committee on Police Affairs and I have made a lot of research on the issue of state police and regional police. It was on before, there was a Willink Commission in 1954  which decided for fear of minorities not to allow regional police.

    “Of course, if you want to do state police, you may do it but it must be confined to specific aspect of law enforcement, you can take away things like national elections but probably local issues, arrest of local thieves, local control of security, but it must be limited.” he said

    On the declaration by the SGF that  President Buhari will contest, he said “Well, SGF is SGF, so he has better ears of the President than me, so they might have discussed. But I think President Buhari has started a lot of good things for this country and he needs second term to continue to consolidate what he has achieved so far and I am in support.

    Asked whether senators will support Buhari, he said “Well, senators are senators but I know the majority will do so. All the promises he has made about anti corruption, security, he has finished Boko Haram although there are lingering security problems now which I am sure he is taking serious action to stop.”

    Speaking on the report of El Rufai Committee on restructuring, the senator said, “This is going to the party and the party will most likely pass it to the Senate or the National Assembly but what I realised from my investigation is that, there is serious opposition to state police from the National Assembly and that is as a result of the relationship between some governors and their National Assembly members.

    “They feel they are not handling local government elections democratically let alone if they have state police. So obviously if the governors want that portion to pass, they must have good relationship with the National Assembly members.

    According to him, the alteration of the sequence of election by the National Assembly has not created any problem but democracy in action. He however, pointed out that the amendment done so far is illegal.

    “First, the amendment of the sequence of the election was passed from the House. When we set for harmonisation, the House version was adopted. But those of us who are old in this chamber know that it was absolutely illegal. If you look at Section 72 of the constitution, it is clear that it is INEC that is mandated to fix date, already INEC has fixed date and nobody can change it.

    “There was a legal case in 2003 during Obasanjo’s regime, when the National Assembly passed a law to hold all elections in one day. That matter went to court because Obasanjo refused to sign it, they over ruled his veto by two-third, then INEC went to court.

    “Court in its jurisdiction declared that nobody can interfere with INEC. That was upheld by court of appeal and we didn’t go to Supreme Court, so it stopped there. Therefore, that judgement is still subsisting that nobody can interfere with the functions of INEC in terms of fixing dates of elections.

    “Now, I learnt the committee erroneously used the aborted constitutional amendment which was made in 2014.

    He described as the alteration as ” too costly” and stated further that: “Look at the amount of money that will be spent, where will you get that amount of money, what about the timing?

    “It will expose some of our colleagues to danger. If you have a senator alone will contest the election, he must pay his agents, he must pay for security, he must pay for everything. And if he is afraid of his governor, his governor is now free to deal with him.

    “Of course if he contest together with the president as put by INEC, for the presidential election, the security aspect, even the funding, will cover him up. So, obviously my colleagues have not thought much on this issue. It is not legal at all.” he said

  • State police will only address local issues –  Abu Ibrahim

    State police will only address local issues – Abu Ibrahim

    The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Police Affairs, Senator Abu Ibrahim, said on State Police would only work for local issues like arrest of local thieves and local control of security.

    He said national elections and other issues would be beyond state police when created.

    He spoke with State House correspondents after observing jumaat prayer at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Asked if he was opposed to creation of state police, he said: “Yes and I have my reasons. I am Chairman, Senate Committee on Police Affairs and I have made a lot of research on the issue of state police and regional police. It was on before, there was a Commission in 1954 which decided for fear of minorities not to allow regional police.

    “Of course, if you want to do state police, you may do it but it must be confined to specific aspect of law enforcement. You can take away things like national elections but probably local issues, arrest of local thieves and local control of security, but it must be lineated and limited.”

    On the declaration by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Boss Mustapha, that President Buhari will seek re-election in 1999, he said: “Well, SGF is SGF, so he has better ears of the President than me, so they might have discussed. But I think President Buhari has started a lot of good things for this country and he needs second term to continue to consolidate what he has achieved so far and I am in support.

     

     

     

  • Governors, National Assembly to interface on state police

    Governors, National Assembly to interface on state police

    The Nigeria Governors Forum (NGF) is to nominate a team from their members to interface with National Assembly over the creation of State Police.

    State governors and the federal parliament had agreed to allow states to have their police at the closing of a two-day summit last week on national security organised by the Senate.

    They had supported  Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo who stated at the opening of the event that state police was “the way to go.”

    The NGF meeting holding at the old Banquet Hall of the State House, Abuja on Wednesday night will raise the team.

    Other issues on the agenda NGF’s  meeting was the Recovery of stamp duties and Improving Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) through harmonized motor registry/traffic management system by Dimensions Information Technology.

    The meeting which started around 9pm is presided over by the NGF Chairman and Zamfara State Governor, Abdulazeez Yari.

    Those in attendance as at the time of filing this report were, governors of Bauchi, Mohammed Abubakar, Borno, Kashim Shettima, Kebbi, Atiku Bagudu, Kogi, Yahaya Bello, Kwara, Abdulfatah Ahmed, Jigawa, Ibrahim Hassan, Ondo, Rotimi Akeredolu, Kaduna, Nasir El-Rufai, Nasarawa, Tanko Al-makura, Kano, Abdullahi Ganduje, Edo,  Godwin Obaseki.

    The deputy governors in attendance are Benue, Benson Abounu, Ebonyi, Kelechi Igwe, Enugu, Cecelia Ezeilo, Plateau, Sonni Gwanle Tyoden, Osun, Titi Laoye-Tomori, Rivers, Ipalibo Banigo, Ogun, Yetunde Onanuga, Akwa Ibom, Moses Ekpo, Ekiti, Kolapo Olusola, Sokoto, Ahmed Aliyu,  and Lagos, Dr. Oluranti Adebule.

  • State police and public security

    The debate over the necessity for the establishment of state police has been on for quite some time. A latest disclosure by the vice president, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, at the security forum organized by the National Assembly about the expediency for state police has, however, suddenly given hope to advocates of a decentralized police system that victory is near.

    State police is an important component of true federalism and emblem of authority of governance, since sovereignty is divided between the federal authority and federating components. Though the 1999 Constitution provides for a single federal police, this precludes states from taking charge of the protection of lives and properties of their people as chief security officer and denied them the emblem of authority. If Nigeria is really a federation, this is a constitutional lacuna that must be addressed through constitutional amendment to pave way for state police.

    Considering recent level of threat to public security across the country, taking recourse to state police seems a more attractive option. Without a doubt, the centralised policing system has not really been effective and it is only logical that we consider other plausible options.

    Aside the well accepted philosophy that that policing is essentially a local matter, every crime is local in nature. Hence, it is only rational to localize the police force. No matter its form, crime detection needs a local knowledge that state police can better provide.

    Similarly, police officers who serve in their indigenous communities are stakeholders with vested interests in such places. Considering the reality that they will always be part of their respective communities, even after retirement, it is doubtful if they will perpetrate anti-social activities in such communities. A recent Human Right Watch survey reveals that most of the accidental and other extra judicial killings that have taken place in the country were perpetrated by officers posted outside their states of origin.

    Knowledge of the local environment is needed for effective policing. It is only logical that to fight crime in the locality, you need law enforcement personnel familiar with the terrain. Using police officers from Jalingo, for instance, to burst a crime in Onitsha could at best be counter- productive. The local criminals with good knowledge of the area will always outwit such ‘foreign’ police officers.

    Intelligence gathering is an indispensable necessity in crime fighting. But this seems to be currently lacking in the system. It is difficult to access high-quality intelligence, unless you know the people very well, and they in turn trust you. The present arrangement certainly negates credible intelligence gathering. We live in a society where people treat perceived strangers with lots of reservation.

    This, no doubt, is quite understandable.  It is difficult to trust somebody whose language, culture and tradition you are unfamiliar with. The truth is that people will always be afraid of passing on information to those they don’t trust, and this is for obvious reasons.

    Perhaps more importantly, it is important that a state governor who ought to be the chief security officer of his state has the control of the police command in same state. The current trend where the police commissioner in a state takes orders from Abuja concerning security issues in a state is not too tidy.

    Ironically, almost all state governments in the country invest significantly in the diverse security agencies in their respective states. In Lagos, for example, the state government has in the last 17 years invested billions of naira on public security. In –fact, the first Security Trust Fund to be established, by any government, in the country was initiated by the Lagos State government. Many other states have since followed the Lagos model, in the process committing several billions of naira into the project.

    Now, will it not amount to double standard that a governor bears such a huge financial burden, which in the first place should be that of the federal government, only for the system to turn around and deny him un-hindered control of same institution at crucial moments?

    To properly address current security question in the country, we need to tackle the touchy issue of state police. No matter how much a state government spends on security, the reality is that it has no direct control over any of the national security organs. The current centralized police structure in the country will continue to limit the capacity of states to effectively and clinically address security issues.

    It has been argued severally that state police is nothing but a recipe for anarchy as it could lead to abuse of power.  This argument is neither here nor there. The reality, however, is that the present centralized policing arrangement has, over the years, equally been subjected to limitless abuse in diverse ways. At some periods in our national history, we have witnessed instances of distasteful use of police by the appropriate authorities to perpetrate gross injustice.

    In an ideal federal system, the issue of state police should not be a contentious matter. If we are really serious about overcoming current security challenges in the polity, the time to embrace the option of state police is now. A viable and dynamic security system is required to sustain significant development and ensure adequate security of life and property.  The police as we currently have in the country might not be able to ensure effective security across the nation.  Currently, the police does not have up to 400, 000 personnel in a nation whose estimated population stands above 180 million. This is the clear picture of an institution that is in dire need of restructuring.

    Let’s face the fact; Nigeria is too large and complex to be policed centrally. In the First Republic, there were regional police and local police existing side by side the federal police. If we are really serious about overcoming current security challenges in the country, we need to re-examine the issue state police more earnestly and objectively. If Nigeria is really a federation, this is a constitutional lacuna that must be addressed through constitution amendment to pave way for state police.

    We need to come to term with the fact that, state police is a necessity in a federal system like Nigeria if we are to effectively combat crime as it is being practiced by other federating units the world over.  Given the required political will, we can successfully and efficiently operate state police in the country. The time has come for us to give the subject the desired attention.

     

    • Ogunbiyi is of the Ministry of Information & Strategy, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos
  • Governors back state police

    Governors back state police

    •’States capable can go on’

    Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) Chairman Abdulaziz Yari yesterday said creation of state police would help in addressing the spate of insecurity in the country.

    Yari, who is Zamfara State Governor, stated this at the end of a two-day summit organised by the Senate Ad hoc Committee on Review of Current Security Infrastructure in Nigeria.

    He said:, “Today, we have reiterated the position of Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and the position of the security summit we held in August, that there is a need for the state police; we can say it is the only answer.”

    The Vice President had during the opening of the summit last week drummed  support for state police.

    He had said: “We cannot realistically police a country the size of Nigeria centrally from Abuja. State police and other community policing methods are clearly the way to go.”

    The governor said internal security was supposed to be handled and managed by the police, and that the police of today were inadequate.

    “There are about four million people in Zamfara and we have fewer than 5,000 policemen.

    “We in governance agree that we can find a way through which we can fine-tune the issue of state police,” he said.

    On the cost implications, Yari explained: “It is not all the states that are supposed to have the state police, those that could should be able to have it.

    “It is something we cannot take off at the same time.  We were created differently.”

    He said the issue of security was not something to play with, adding that the primary responsibility of any government is to ensure that lives and properties of citizens are protected.

    “Many challenges of Nigerians for the past 10 years ranging from Boko Haram, cattle rustlers, armed banditry and militancy in the Niger Delta are dwindling the Nigerian economy and threatening the unity of the nation,” Yari said.

  • Governors back creation of state police

    Governors back creation of state police

    State governors on Monday expressed their support for creation of state police as solution to the nation’s security challenges.

    However, they insisted that the implementation of the policy would be in phases to enable states with limited resources to continue with Federal Police pending the time they would be in better position to fund state police.

    Vice President Osinbajo had last week declared that creation of state police is the solution to the multifaceted security challenges in the country

    The governors’ decision was part of the resolutions taken at the just concluded national summit convened by the Senate in Abuja.

    The Chairman of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, Alhaji Abdulaziz Yari, told journalists at the venue of the summit, that they were in support of state police as suggested by Osinbajo last week.

    Yari, who is also the governor of Zamfara State, noted the 36 governors had given the go ahead for creation of state police since 2014.

    He said: “The first primary responsibility of government anywhere in the world is to ensure that the lives and property of citizens are protected. And there has been so many challenges in Nigeria for the past 10 years ranging from Boko Haram, cattle rustling, armed banditary and militancy in the Niger Delta, dwindling the economy and even threatening the unity of the nation.”

    “The take home from this summit is that the state police is something we have agreed during the constitutional amendment but at a later time when the Forum divided into two, some governors played to the gallery, which is unfortunate.”

    Yari said the governors admitted that the police force as presently constituted is inadequate.

     

     

  • Mixed feelings trail proposal for state police

    Mixed feelings trail proposal for state police

    Ijaw leaders, lawyers and other stakeholders, Friday, expressed mixed feelings over the possibility of establishing state police to tackle crime waves in the country.

    A former President of the Ijaw National Council (INC), Prof. Kimse Okoko, said without factoring other ingredients of restructuring, establishing a state police would be an exercise in futility.

    Okoko, the immediate past Pro-Chancellor, University of Uyo, insisted that the country was in need of a brand new constitution to accommodate all requirements for true federalism including the state police.

    He said: “State police alone without changing the constitution is a waste of time. We cannot do it in piece meal. If we restructure, every state will has its own police side by side with the federal police as we have in other countries.

    “We have the Federal police in the U.S. and the state police. They all have their own jurisdiction.  The state police can ask for assistance from the federal and invite them. They can come only on invitation.

    “The constitution needs to be re-written. We need to have a new constitution where some of other aspects affiliated with the state will also be taken care of. Amending one part of it as the National Assembly is trying to do is not going solve the problem”.

    Also the immediate past President, Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) Worldwide, Mr. Udengs Eradiri, said though the state police have their advantages, they should be part of the general clamour for restructuring.

    Eradiri said: “In a true federal system, state police is one of the ingredients. Much as you cannot rule out politics, state police has its advantages. The state government can use the state police against perceived opposition. We have seen that the federal one is not working as it should be, I think it is time to try something different.

    “But taking out the state police as one ingredients of federalism will not make it a success except other aspects of federalism that have been canvassed are also put into considerations. So, that when you are talking about state police, other issues of devolving power to the state and local government will also be put in place.

    “Once all the machinery begin to play where the people begin to take ownership of the political situation in their environment, then the issue of checks and balances and control will begin to be paramount.

    “Once there is effective checks and balances in the system, it will be difficult to abuse the state police. But within this system we are operating and arising from the conflicts we are experiencing, picking only the state police will not yield the desired fruit”.

    In his submission, a prominent Yengoa-based lawyer, Mr. Somina Johnbull, said the country could borrow a lead from other developed countries such as South Africa, USA and Britain to effectively implement state and community policing.

    “It is laudable that finally someone from the federal government has acknowledged state police to solve the incessant security problems that we have. We cannot do without state and community policing.

    “Contrary to the requirement of one policeman to 400, our is a way beyond that and the complexities of our local environment make it necessary that the task of policing must be shared by all divisions of government.

    “However, the fear of abuse will have to be addressed. How can this be addressed? It is by borrowing from the model of South Africa and other institutions like America and Britain where the issue of security has independence”, he said.

    He said such independence must be in words and in deed adding that it should include financial autonomy.

    To avoid conflict between the federal and the state police, he said there must be proper delineation of jurisdictions.

    Johnbull, who is also the Secretary, Bayelsa State branch of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) said: “The independence of the state police is not just in name but also in deed. It works in financial independence and they are required only to obey the law as it is not under the direction of any political figure.

    “The truth is that those opposed to state police are afraid that the state governors may bring their weight to bear and it might also lead to regular confrontation between federal police and the state police.

    “First, there will be proper delineation of what state police can do areas they can enter and matters they have jurisdiction over. In the US, crimes in federal buildings are off limit for state police. There need to be proper delineation to minimise conflict.

    “Just as in the judiciary, where you have federal and state courts, however, there is a central control authority which can regulate and make everybody fall in line. There should be similar authority that can regulate the activities of state police. They shouldn’t be solely loyal to their states; there should be some measure of control in a way that it should not be abused”.

    Another famous lawyer and former Bayelsa State Chairman, NBA, Mr. Stanley Damabide, said the Federal Government must grapple with the task of amending the constitution before it could enthrone state policing.

    “The first issue is the constitutional framework. Unless the constitution is amended we can’t have state police. The implication then is that the federal government cannot go it alone. It has to collaborate with all the state before it can effectively ensure the constitution is amended.

    “It can work. More than two third of the state’s and their state executives will want state police. It gives them more powers. But we must brace up to meet possible abuses and see what we can do about them because he who pays the piper dictates the tune”.

  • Prospects and constraints of state police

    Prospects and constraints of state police

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) Committee on Restructuring has recommended state police. MUSA ODOSHIMOKHE examines the prospects and constraints of a ‘federalised police  structure.’

    THE agitation for state police is not new. It was one of the issues that received prominent attention during the 2014 National Conference. So, when the All Progressives Congress (APC) panel on restructuring recommended that the Federal Government should implement the policy, Nigerians said it was a step in the right direction.

    The precarious security situation in the country has further amplified the need to have a functional state police that would meet global best practices. The views of Nigerians are that it will stem the tide of criminal activities and speed up the judicial prosecution of those who take the law into their hands.

    The report submitted by the chairman of the APC’s restructuring panel and Kaduna State Governor Nasir el-Rufai to the party hierarchy have been applauded within the party and beyond. Observers urged the President Muhammadu Buhari to immediately implement the policy, to stem the threat in security.

    Lagos lawyer Mr. Festus Keyamo (SAN) said the APC needs to lobby the National Assembly to implement the recommendation. He said: “It is not enough for the APC panel to make recommendation on state police. The party must initiate a move to amend the constitution, to actualise its plan. Therefore, the party has to lobby its members both at the National Assembly and state assemblies, to amend the provision of the constitution. The APC should be able to lobby their members to achieve this, because it is to their own advantage.”

    Keyamo said the introduction of state police would assist the APC in addressing the current security challenges facing the country. The administration is currently under fire over the dwindling security situation.

    He added that an ideal society must embrace state police. He added: “But, African leaders are power drunk and are likely to abuse the power. He, however, urged the National Assembly to moderate the practice.

    He said: “Ideally, in a true federal system, state police is the requirement to run a true federation. My only worry and I am just putting this smack caveat, is whether our governors will not use it as a serious instrument of oppression to run the opposition out of their state.

    “This is my major worry, even the small power given to them to organise local government elections, they don’t even concede one councillor to the opposition. Without mentioning names, you have governors who behave like mad men. If they now have absolute control of the police force, none of the opposition will come and pass the night in their state. This is my worry about that, but ideally it is the best requirement for a federation.”

    Protagonists of state police believe the practice is not new, as community policing has been in existence for a long time. They said those who form the bulk of the security outfit were men with sound knowledge of the environment.

    A semblance of state police was used by the Native Authorities after 1914 and up till 1924, when residents guarded their communities. The colonial masters depended on them. Local chiefs also relied on their own police for protection.

    A member of the 2014 National Conference, Chief Femi Okurounmu, said the idea of a state police was not out of place, if the APC was sincere with its panel’s report.  He said Nigeria needs state police at this point because it could be the key solution to the growing insecurity. He said the country is at a crossroads.

    He said: “The country needs a state police very badly. Those of us who believe in restructuring have been saying this for years. The APC panel that recommended it is not to be taken seriously. They are just saying this to get votes in 2019.

    “They do not have any intention to restructure the country or carry out those measures they have recommended. They just want to feel public opinion, because they know where the public opinion lies. Again, if every state has its police there will be adequate security in place. The Fulani herdsmen will not be killing people with impunity.

    “People are being killed and the Federal Government is doing nothing about it. It controls the police, but it has done little or nothing to stem the tide of violence. If states have their own police, I am sure all that is going on in the country like kidnapping, ritual killings, robberies and other dangerous crime will not be happening. They would have arrested those behind the killings and brought to justice.”

    Afenifere chieftain, Amos Akingba, said since the federal police was not meeting the expectations of Nigerians, it was time state police was introduced. He said: “There is nothing wrong with state police; we used to have state police and it is not novel in this situation. So, if we go back to what is good there is nothing unusual about that. If we have a federal police and it is not working accordingly then you go back to state and federal sharing police.

    “At the 2014 National Conference reports, we recommended that there should be state police. So, for the APC to recommend it again means it has advantage. These are just parts of the bigger picture; we used to have a constitution that was federal before 1966.”

    The Chairman, Lagos State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Hon. Moshood Salvador, said the party has never hidden its candid opinion on how best to run the country. He said the APC was merely running away from the truth, because state police is the way forward.

    He said: “Let me tell you, we have agreed on this thing at National Conference, the APC is only hiding behind the finger. We have told them the right thing to be done in this country, to make it better. State police is the way forward.

    “If you have state police, you will not be waiting for the Nigeria Police or the army to come and fight Boko Haram. Without state police you are not even independent as a state. You cannot do anything, if we keep depending on the Nigeria Police alone.

    “Let me tell you, you cannot know the terrain of the compound more than the owner of the compound. In our communities, we know those who are good boys and the bad boys. You cannot bring somebody from outside and tell me he will know all the corners in my area than I know it. Therefore, you cannot bring somebody that is outside the environment to come and police you. We must stop deceiving ourselves.”

    Former Minister of Transport and PDP chieftain, Chief Ebenezer Babatope, called for a consensus on the matter, noting that, if Nigerians agree it was state police they wanted, the country would not get better, except the people’s voice is heeded.

    Babatope said there should be checks and balances to make it work. He said state police could be regulated through rules and regulations that would be enshrined in the constitution. He added: “If there is a consensus in Nigeria that there should be state police, we shall have state police. There is nothing wrong with it as long as it is put under certain control by a superior force which will guarantee stability and peace in the country.

    “If there are constitutional checks and balances the initiative will function effectively. There is no governor that can override whatever that is in the constitution. As far as I am concerned, I believe that Nigeria is ripe for state police.

    “We should make sure that the state police we are going have is not going to be the one that is primitive, by subjecting the federal laws to ridicule and it is not going to be the one that will bridge the rights of the individuals.”

    Others say Nigeria should follow the the American model. Arewa Youth leader Alhaji Shettima Yerima said the country would get better if it decides to fashion its state police after that of the Americans. He said: “It is a welcome development. In place like America, where we copied our presidential system of government, state police is in place. Apart from the federal police they have other group like Sheriff and other community police. I don’t think it is bad idea.

    “The number of policemen that we have on ground is not even enough to provide adequate policing for the country. A police man is expected to protect between 30 and 40 people, I don’t think this is proper. Even though, I know that politicians will abuse the privilege, it is long overdue. We must ensure that there is a law backing the introduction of police.

    “The current system of policing is wrong. For instance, if you take Mohammed from Kaura, Sokoto to place like Warri, Delta State and you ask him to tackle crime, he will face problems, because he is not used to the terrain. If you have a community police where the people from that environment operate within that confine, they will be able to police the the various communities properly. If crimes are committed you will be in the best position to know who to hold responsible after due investigation. It is a welcome development by the party.”

     

  • Insecurity: FG backs state police

    Insecurity: FG backs state police

    A major breakthrough may have been achieved Thursday by those agitating for the creation of state police.

    The Federal Government threw its back behind the agitation saying that creation of state police is clearly the way to go in the face of multifaceted security challenges in the country.

    Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, stated government’s new thinking on the security architecture of the country at a summit on national security organised by the Senate in Abuja.

    Osinbajo’s pronouncement on the need to create state police, which received spontaneous applause from participants at the summit, came as Senate President, Abubakar Bukola Saraki, told the gathering that the sharp increase in murderous violence, over and above the relatively manageable level of insecurity that has plagued the country for some time, jolted the Senate out of any last vestiges of complacency or denial of the challenge.

    Saraki noted that there can be no denying the horrific reality in many parts of the country today.

    He lamented that people who should be neighbours are turning on one another and taking up arms.

    For him, “these attacks and reprisal attacks are an intolerable cycle of hell that must be broken. Killings, kidnappings, mayhem and general lawlessness cannot be the new normal. We must take this country back and restore order.”

    Saraki noted that though there was no doubt that Nigerians possess the capacity to change the narrative, to end the violence and bring succor, what is required is the political will.

    Saraki said: “The coming together of the Executive and Legislative arms of government for this discussion about security is a pointer to the seriousness of the situation, and our determination to tackle the problem. The Summit is also unique, because never before have we had such an inclusive platform for appraising security-related matters in this country.

    “The spike in the bloodletting over the New Year period injected another note of urgency into the matter, and further served to augment the mandate of the Committee, whose members suspended their recess to conduct a fact-finding visit to Benue State, scene of one of the recent killings.

    “It was envisaged that the Summit would provide a platform for critically examining the problem of insecurity, to help collate views and ideas in aid of the search for solutions. It is most reassuring to see us all here – people together – coming together to come up with a national response to a grave problem confronting our nation.

    “To the Executive, I say this: you cannot do it alone – and this is why we are all here to join efforts. It is all hands on deck. No one person, organisation or arm of government can single-handedly tackle the hydra-headed monster of insecurity. The Constitution makes it clear that the safety of lives and property of citizens is the responsibility of government. We in government must therefore do everything in our power to ensure that Nigerians are safe from harm, and their livelihoods and belongings protected.

    “Permit me to observe that those who are in this room have the capacity to bring about a change in this situation, to end the violence and bring succour. We have the capacity. But, do we have the political will? I daresay political will is what is required; and it is my hope that we shall marshal it as a legitimate instrument against this problem. Indeed, there is no reason why that should not be the case. This is not a Summit to trade blames – in no way is this a blame game. Neither is it convened so that any person or entity can take credit. We just want solutions. Solutions only. That is all Nigerians require of us.

    “It is expected that at the end of our deliberations and submissions, we will have a more profound understanding of the nature of the crisis; as well as a realistic assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of our security assets. We should also have a more accurate assessment of challenges to the current disposition of the Nigerian state – through the level of preparedness of all its law and order agencies to security threats.

    Let me add that this Summit should help us achieve some consensus around what needs to be done, in the short term as well as in the long term, to bring comfort and relief to those affected, and assurances of security throughout the country.

    “Distinguished ladies and gentlemen, we would have failed in our responsibility if – by the end of this Summit – we didn’t succeed in triggering higher levels of collaboration and cooperation among all stakeholders, of a character that can be sustained and placed at the service of the nation. This spirit of collaboration and cooperation is, therefore, key.”

    The Senate President said that Summit programme has been designed to allow full and unfettered discussion.

    All participants, he said, are encouraged to be forthright in expressing their views, and show commitment to the need for solution.

    “Let me reiterate that we are not here to indict anybody. This is not an indictment, it is not to lay blame or point fingers, and it is not to take credit for what goes well. This process is very much solutions-driven. In order for us to ameliorate the current difficulties, therefore, it is important that people speak frankly.

    “In that vein, let me say to those who will make contributions during the sessions: please, do not be on the defensive. Nobody is on trial here. Let us make our submissions with openness, in good faith and with an attitude that is forward-looking. When all is said and done, this is a worthy exercise, for the good of Nigeria, and we should all strive to do our best, – and that work begins at this Summit.

    “What our country needs at this time is leadership that will work to douse the flames and reduce tension in the land. It is essential that we lower the barriers in our actions and rhetoric, and refrain from playing politics with a crisis situation in which Nigerian lives are being lost, tragically and needlessly, on a regular basis,” Saraki said.

    On his own, Prof. Osinbajo said, “The nature of our security challenges are complex and known. Securing Nigeria’s over 900,000sq km and its 180 million people requires far more men and material than we have at the moment. It also requires a continuous reengineering of our security architecture and strategy. This has to be a dynamic process.

    “For a country of our size to meet the one policeman to 400 persons prescribed by the United Nations would require triple our current police force; far more funding of the police force and far more funding of our military and other security agencies.

    “We cannot realistically police a country the size of Nigeria centrally from Abuja. State police and other community policing methods are clearly the way to go.”

    The Vice President added that Nigeria must intensify existing collaboration with her neighbours in the Chad Basin by strengthening security especially at border communities to prevent the movement of small arms and disarming armed pastoralists and other bandits who go through the borders day after day.

    He warned that the country must avoid the danger of allowing the crisis to degenerate into religious or ethnic conflict which he said is the responsibility of political, religious and all other facets of the country’s leadership.

    On the upsurge of killings, the Vice President noted that the recent incidents of killings across the country are a reminder that there is no room for complacency in the task of securing Nigeria.

    Osinbajo said: “This is against the backdrop of the remarkable improvements we have recorded on the most dreaded security challenge we had at a time – the fight against Boko Haram.

    “In 2015 when the Buhari administration came on board, much of the North Eastern Nigeria lay in the shadows of the terrorist group. In two and half years since then, our military has done a remarkable job of reclaiming Nigerian territories, rescuing tens of thousands of civilians and routing the Boko Haram. Today, the group is a shadow of itself and has resorted to suicide bombings and other attacks on soft targets in a desperate attention seeking.

    “Boko Haram was by no means the only security challenge that we inherited when we took office 2015. Cattle rustling, pronounced especially in the North West of Nigeria, clashes between farmers and  herdsmen in the North Central region; militant activities in the South South and parts of the South West, ethnic agitation in the South East region; there was also the Islamic Movement of Nigeria in the Northern Nigeria increasingly emboldened to challenge the authority of the state.

    “I want to say that because of the spread and because of the diversity of these threats, the nation’s security architecture was over stretched as our security became engaged on different battle fronts at the same time.”

    He noted that the Federal Government has since assuming office prioritized the anti-terrorism campaign in the North East “and understandably, Boko Haram has receded in public consciousness.”

    He noted that in 2017, the Global Terrorism Index reported that deaths by terrorism dropped by 80 per cent in Nigeria.

    He however acknowledged that other security threats have of course move up to take the place of Boko Haram.

    “This does not mean that the challenges are newly emerging; what is new is our approach and our determination to contain these threats to protect the lives and property of Nigerians. This determination can mostly be seen in the way that our security forces in particular, have dealt with Boko Haram and several of the threats of the country,” Osinbajo said.

    The Vice President said that since the beginning of the year following the massacre in Guma, Gwer and Logo local governments in Benue State, the issue of herdsmen and farmers clashes have dominated the public space.

    Every Nigerian, he said, is entitled to adequate security from government of their livelihoods.

    He said, “Government fails in that responsibility often but I must say, never deliberately. Every killing diminishes us as people; every killing undermines the authority of the state. This is why the saying sometimes that because the President is Fulani he has ignored the killings by herdsmen is both untrue and unfair.

    “In any event, the herdsmen and farmer clashes resulting in deaths has been with us for at least two decades and I have been working with him  for three years now and I do not know any other issue that has given him more concern or on which he has spent more time than this particular issue?

    “What then is being done. The approach of the government has been to deploy more mobile police force to flash points and also, both the Army and Air Force.  The Nigeria Army units in Benue State for example have consistently maintained Forward Operating Bases at the flash areas in Guma, Logo, Katsina Alla and Agatu LGAs.

    “The operation has a genetic name, Operation Zenda . The Army has in the last few days scaled up its personnel and equipment in Agatu,  Guma, Katsina Alla and Logo LGAs . The Army has also recently deployed troops to Awe and Tunga LGAs of Nasarawa State in order to monitor and block the gaps in areas believed to have been used at flash points by armed herdsmen to attack communities in Benue State.”

    He noted that next week as earlier been announced, the Nigeria Army will flag off Exercise Ayan Akpatuma to checkmate the activities of armed bandits on Benue, Taraba  and environs.

    He said that generally, the security forces have performed creditably given the resources available to them.

    Osinbajo noted that the problem is that in some of the worst cases of killings, the security agencies were simply not there in time.

    He said that whenever that happens as was the case of Logo and Guma as well as in Mambilla last year, the failure to protect the lives of citizens is inexcusable and cannot be rationalized by the security apparatus of government in any way.

    Osinbajo quoted President Muhammadu Buhari to have said over the Benue killings  “I am a soldier, I have seen death in warfare but the callous killing of innocent people especially women and children is cowardly and despicable in the extreme and it must be prevented or stopped and the perpetrators must be punished”.

    He noted that in his statement of commiseration to the Governor of Benue State President Buhari said “This is one attack too many, and everything must be done to provide security for the people in our rural communities, I have ordered the security agencies to find and capture the perpetrators, they must face justice.”

    Osinbajo said that anyone who has seen the viciousness of the killings, and the wantonness of the damage to property, is bound to be stupefied by the horror.

    “I was in in Dong village in Adamawa, where herdsmen had attacked the village and killed many. But the vicious killing of Fulani women and children in the same local government in Adamawa State is worthy of mention.

    The Vice President said that one thread running through all of the security challenges in Nigeria is the proliferation of light arms and small weapons.

    “This age-old problem appears to have intensified in recent years on account of the fall of the Libyan Government under Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. These events unleashed large numbers of well-trained fighters, as well as the contents of Gaddafi’s armories,” he said.

    He noted that because they know that the security solution is only one dimension of a multifaceted issue, government is also working with the State Governments and Local Communities.

    He said, “In January the Ministers of Interior and Agriculture, on behalf of the President, met with the affected State Governors, and Security and Intelligence Agencies, to discuss workable solutions.

    “The President and I have at various times this year held Stakeholder Meetings to bring all concerned parties to the table and discuss ways of ensuring peace and security.

    “On January 15, President Buhari met with Benue political, traditional and religious leaders. A week ago, I met with traditional leaders from the Batta and Bachama Communities of Adamawa State. I also met with Fulani groups, the Myetti Allah and several other such groups.

    “These meetings and consultations are crucial; human beings have not yet to my knowledge, developed another way of reaching understanding aside from dialogue.  There can and will be no lasting peace without dialogue, and that there can never be too much dialogue regarding a matter that involves the safety of the lives and property of Nigerians.

    On farmers/herders clashes, Osinbajo said that they are also, with the collaboration of States, and the Governors of Benue, Plateau, Adamawa and along with seven other Governors, have constituted the working group which being chaired by him, where they have been seeking to proffer solutions to some of the problems associated with farmer/herdsmen clashes, but in particular, how to ensure that there is a plan for cattle breeding and rearing which takes into account, contemporary methods of doing so in other parts of the world.

    He noted that also in collaboration with the States and other stakeholders, “we have been developing solutions to the issues of resource scarcity which is at the heart of the conflicts – the increasing competition for grazing land and water heightened by climate change.

    He said that all stakeholders agreed that “we must now develop new ideas to prevent clashes between herdsmen and farmers; in particular enabling the cows and herders to become more sedentary.”

    He added that it is obvious that the physical movement of cattle in an endless journey on the move must now begin to take a different shape.

    The country, he said, cannot afford it even from the economic perspective, there must be another way.

    He said “We believe when cattle is sedentary, it will improve the productivity of the cattle. Our beef cattle Sokoto Gudali adds 0.5 Kg per day while the Brahma in Brazil which is bred in a ranch adds 2.5kg per day. Our dairy cows produce 1 litre per day, whereas in other parts of Africa, there is production of almost 15 – 20 litres per day.

    “There is also a clear sense which I think must be appreciated, that the Federal government cannot dictate to States what to do with their land. This is so because the Land Use Act of 1978 puts land under the control of Governors on behalf of their States. Also, the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney General of Lagos State versus the Attorney General of the Federation in 2004, held that use of land resources and permits for such use, lie firmly in the hands of State Governments. Even for use of Federal lands in the States according to the Supreme Court, building or development control permit must be sought from the Governors of the States.

    “However in several States, especially in the North, there are duly gazetted grazing reserves. A majority of these grazing reserves are degraded and are without pasture or water especially in the dry season.

    “Grazing routes leading to these reserves must also be secured. The grazing reserves to be effective and operate effectively, should operate as ranches or livestock production centres on a commercial basis.  The ranches will have adequate water from boreholes, salt points and pasture.

    “The locations would serve both as forage points, but also centres for providing extension services to boost animal care, feeding and veterinary facilities, and even abattoirs. Because the ranches are commercial ventures, cattle owners will pay for its use.

    ‘It is important to note that by and large, in consultation with stakeholders, all agree that where adequate provision is made on a commercial basis, there is no reason why there won’t be cooperation to use those ranches because there are both economic and social benefits for everyone, including herders.

    “Aside from States that have gazetted grazing areas, so far about 13 States have agreed to allocate 5,000 hectares of land for the ranching or livestock production. We must emphasis that in arriving at any of these decisions in the States, the States, Federal Government and all of the Stakeholders have to seat together and work out solutions that will benefit everyone. This cannot be done by fear or force, people have to work together to ensure that there is adequate consultations.

    “Let me reiterate, that on no account will any lands be seized or forcefully taken to create these ranches or grazing areas. All insinuations to that effect should be disregarded. No one is giving land to herdsmen, as is being falsely alleged. Instead, it is in our view that States that are willing and which have set aside land for development should cooperate with willing investors into commercially viable, government-supported ranches or livestock production centres for commercial use.”

  • State police: Soyinka backs call

    State police: Soyinka backs call

    • •‘Second term call hasty’

    Nobel Laureate Prof Wole Soyinka has added his voice to the on-going agitations for restructuring of the country, saying that Nigeria is over-centralised.

    The eminent writer also gave his backing to the clamour for the decetralisation of the police.

    “My own position is that people shouldn’t allow themselves be put up by those who try to cheat on the expression, ‘restructuring.’ It doesn’t matter by what name you call it. We all know that this nation was deconstructed and what we live in right now, as a nation, is not allowing structuring that expresses the true will of Nigerians,” he said.

    Soyinka spoke yesterday in Lagos, when he announced the 10 Nigerian writers, who would be leaving for Lebanon in a cultural exchange programme, The Sail Project, between The Wole Soyinka Foundation and Cedar Institute, University of Lebanon.

    According to him, every Nigerian knows what restructuring is all about, whether it is called reconfiguring, return to status quo, or reformulating the protocols of association.

    He however decried those who try to divert away attention from the main issue by mouthing platitudes like it is the mind that needs restructuring.  To him, this is a constant process, both as individual exercise as well as even the theological exercise. “People go to churches and mosques for their minds to be restructured. Restructuring the mind is not the issue; nobody is saying restructuring the mind should not be undertaken; anybody who is involved in examination already engages in mental and or attitudinal reconstruction.

    “So people should not try to substitute one for another. I find it very dishonest and cheap, trivialising the issue when people said it is the mind, which needs to be restructured. Who is denying that? So, why bring it up? We’re talking about the protocol of the association of the constitutive part of the nation. We’re talking about decentralisation, that is, another word. This country is over-centralised and that has been the bugbear of development, even of issues like security.

    “Even if it is one state, that state has the right to say, listen people, let us restructure this state; the protocols that went into the making of this state are no longer viable or have been distorted along the way or have been abandoned and we want to go back to the original set of protocols that created what we call his national entity. You can say you want to reinvent the wheels completely or you want to go back to the original protocols of association,” he added.

    He noted that an average citizen felt less secure than a few years ago, yet ‘when people talk about state police, there are reasons for it. When they talk about bringing policing right down to the community level, they know what they are talking about; this is also part of restructuring or reconfiguration of the articles of association.’

    When asked to comment on the clamour for a second term in office for Buhari by his aides and supporters, Soyinka said he was shocked by the move just midway into the president’s administration.

    “Why are we talking about second term, for heaven’s sake? I don’t understand this; we have hardly gone half-way or barely gone half-way and people are already talking about positions. I refuse to be part of that discussion and absolutely refuse to be part of that discussion.”