Tag: STATE POLICE

  • Kwankwaso wants state police

    Kano State governor, Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso, has advocated the creation of state police in the country, saying the existing police force has veered from serving Nigerians to protecting the interest of occupants of the Presidential Villa.

    Kwankwaso, who had hitherto opposed the creation of state police, lamented that what, happened last week, when the police walked in and asked five out of the G-7 Governors to disperse from a justifiable meeting at his lodge in Abuja, demonstrated the inclination and ineptitude of the nation’s police.

    Receiving the Senate Committee on Police affairs, led by its chairman, Chief Igwe Paulinus Nwagu, who visited him in Kano, the governor described the police disruption of the meeting as upsetting and an insult on the people who voted them into power.

    “I am not advising the police to pitch their tent with any side. They should be seen as neutral. The police and other security agencies must not be used by anybody to intimidate others or perpetuate injustice,” governor Kwankwaso said.

    Lamenting that the Nigerian police is recklessly being involved in national politics, the governor warned that such action will not augur well for national unity and will continue to erode the integrity of the institution.

    He maintained that even though the Federal Government is taking largest share of the total national revenue at the moment, state governments are the major financiers of the police in their respective states.

     

     

  • Still on the state police

    The on-going political impasse in Rivers State and its implication on the socio-political stability of the country has once again brought to the front burner the need for a more scientific and better managed police force.  The fact that an elected governor of a state is not sure of his safety under the present arrangement makes it expedient for the creation of state police.  Indeed, if  it is true, as it is being alleged in certain quarters, that the Rivers State police authorities are guilty of complicity in the crisis, by joining forces with the powers- that- be to make the state un-governable for Governor Rotimi Amaechi, then it is time for us to give serious consideration to the whole question of state police.

    If the governor that is constitutionally regarded as the chief security officer of his state could no longer enjoy the trust of his state’s police commissioner, it is obvious that the system that is currently being operated is weak and faulty. One finds it rather absurd that the Rivers State police commissioner, Mbu Joseph Mbu, who was quoted in some national dailies to be calling Governor Amaechi a despot still occupies his seat. If the Inspector General of Police should by any means publicly insult the person and the office of the president, would he have stayed a day longer on that seat?

    A state governor, as the chief security officer of his state, in an ideal setting, ought to have the control of police stationed in his state. The current trend where the Police Commissioner in a state will have to take orders from Abuja concerning security issues in a state, is, to say the least, quite pathetic and unfortunate. Imagine the many agonies of Governor Amaechi as he helplessly watches the police authorities in his state, which is being partly funded by his government, turn against his administration. Imagine what he, as chief security officer of the state, could have done to stem the dangerous drift in his state. Poor man! What a frustrating experience it must have been for him when he could not even vouch for the loyalty of men that police his official residence and even his person.

    Paradoxically, almost all the governors in the country are investing heavily in the various police commands in their states. In Lagos State, for example, the government in the last 13 years has invested billions of naira on the state police command as well as other security organs in the state. In fact, the first Security Trust Fund to be established by any government in the country was initiated by the Lagos State government. Similarly, the governments of Akwa Ibom, Rivers, and Ogun states, to mention but a few, are examples of states that have invested hugely in security. Now, does it not amount to double standard that a governor bears such a huge responsibility, which in the first place should be that of the Federal Government, only for the system to turn around and deny him unhindered control of the same institution?

    It has been argued in some quarters that state police is nothing but a recipe for anarchy. Those who hold this view believe that it could lead to abuse of power and political vendetta by the various state governors. Others are of the opinion that it could lead to political turmoil. The reality, however, is that the present centralised structure has, over the years, been subjected to limitless abuse by the central authority. If state governors could manage other institutions of governance there is no reason why they cannot manage state police. The combined team of LASTMA, Federal Road Safety Commission officials along with the police are all collaborating and complementing one another on Lagos roads to maintain traffic and instil discipline in motorists. Just imagine Lagos roads with just only traffic police in control!

    The truth is that Nigeria is too large and complex to be policed centrally. In an ideal federal system, the issue of state police should not be a contentious matter, after all, in the First Republic, there were regional police and local police existing side by side the federal police. If we are really serious about overcoming current security challenges in the polity, the time to embrace state police is now. If our country must progress, the big question should be who is even afraid of state police and why?  Could it be that some people are comfortable harassing their real and perceived enemies with the current arrangement, or why is it that the police is always the ready tool of oppression whenever the Abuja lords want to settle scores with their opponents?

    State Police is an important component of true federalism and emblem of authority of governance, since sovereignty is divided between the central authority and federating state authorities.  It is not a new concept in Nigeria, but is rather a clamour for modification to the colonial legacy of Native Authority Police which successfully worked alongside the Nigeria Police Force till the 1970s before it was abolished and integrated into a single Nigeria Police Force by the military oligarchy (who had an infamous sojourn into politics) to achieve their unitary command system. The Native Authority police was very effective as a tool for combating crime and maintaining orderliness that time, though with some excesses and abuses typical of the party politics as it was played at that time.

    Today, party politics is more mature and robust than it used to be in time past. Though the 1999 Constitution provides for a single federal police, this precludes states from taking charge of the protection of lives and properties of their people as Chief Security Officer and denied them the emblem of authority.   It was this central nature of the police that gave the killers of the former Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Uncle Bola Ige opportunity to hatch their plan with ease. If Nigeria is really a federation, centralized system is a constitutional lacuna that must be addressed through constitution amendment to pave way for State Police.

    It has also been argued that many states cannot afford the cost of establishing and maintaining state police. It is worthy to note that the primary and most fundamental responsibility of any government at whatever level is the protection of lives and property of its citizenry. This is the cross they swore to carry and fortunately, no State has complained that it is too heavy for her to address.

    On a final note, State Police is a necessity in a federal system like Nigeria if we are to effectively combat crime as it is being practiced by other federating units the world over.  Given the required political will, we can successfully and efficiently operate State Police in the country. The time has come for us to give the subject the desired attention and we can no longer shy away from this.  God bless Nigeria!

    • Ibirogba is Lagos Commissioner for Information and Strategy

  • Minister rules out state police

    Minister rules out state police

    Nigeria cannot have state police until the existing central policing system is stabilised, Police Affairs Minister, Caleb Olubolade has said.

    Olubolade stated this while briefing the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on Tuesday.

    “I believe we should first stabilise the existing police before considering the creation of state police. We should wait till the time the Nigerian people and the National Assembly see the need for the establishment of a state police.

    “My candid opinion is that we must make the present arrangement work before we talk of introducing new methods.

    “The existing police must be trained and properly equipped so that we can be proud of the police we have. Our policemen are good and they have demonstrated this during peace keeping operations in other countries,” Olubolade stated.

    According to the minister, the Federal Government is presently focusing attention on training and equipping the police for effective policing, adding that crime fighting has become scientific.

    “Fighting crime globally has become scientific and we need qualified people who can fight crimes through intelligence gathering,” he added.

    Olubolade told the party leaders that the police authorities have been working towards upgrading the existing police institutions nationwide.

    He appealed to Nigerians to assist the police in the duty of protecting lives and property.

     

     

  • Why I advocated for state police – Plateau governor

    Why I advocated for state police – Plateau governor

    Plateau State governor, Jonah David Jang, has explained the reasons for his strong advocacy of a state police.

    Jang, who made a remark during a public lecture to mark his 69th birthday, said his advocacy for a state police was not for selfish intention but for the improvement of the overall security of Nigeria citizens.

    Jang said, “My support for a state police is if Nigeria aspires to be among the top 20 economies and nations, we must do the right things the top countries have done in combating crime.

    “If a state under a federal system cannot be protected by the federal police and armies, then the next option is the state police. In the first place, there is no central police in any of the known federal government in any advanced democratic society.

    “The Nigerian Constitution ascribed the governors the status of chief security officers of our state, yet we have no control over the federal police, yet we are asked to support in funding the federal police.

    “My colleagues in the north misunderstood my request for state police. They alleged that I will use my police to kill all Muslims on the plateau, and I will use my police to kill all settlers in Plateau State.

    “But my colleague did not know that I practically grew up with Muslims, they did not know I come from the tribe that is most accommodative than any other tribe in this country.

    “By the way, what do I gain by killing all Muslims in Jos, or driving away all settlers from Jos? I am a Christian, I know God created all human beings be you Muslims, Christians or pagans. So, who I’m I to take life created by God?”

     

  • Dons, lawyers disagree on state police

    Dons, lawyers disagree on state police

    Section 214 of the Constitution which established the Nigeria Police Force (NPF). Sub-section 1 states: “There shall be a Police Force for Nigeria which shall be known as the Nigeria Police Force, and subject to the provisions of this section, no other Police Force shall be established for the Federation or any part thereof.” In accordance with this provision, Nigeria has operated a unified central police force since independence in 1960. However, with time, there has been increase in population, criminal activities, economic and political spheres of life, which calls for close policing of the citizens. In addition, new waves of crimes and criminal activities such as kidnapping, terrorism, armed banditory and sundry high-tech criminal activities have brought the need for policemen to be familiar with their areas of operations, culture, customs, among others. This has led to calls for the amendment of the Constitution to make provision for state police. This call has received different reactions from different parts of the country. While some believe state police is what Nigeria requires to tackle its security challenges, others argue that Nigeria is not yet “ripe” for it. Legal Editor, JOHN AUSTIN UNACHUKWU sought the views of university dons and lawyers on the issue.

    Prof. Nnamdi Aduba of the

    University of Jos, said: “Any

    observant commentator would have long noticed that what we have at the moment is not Federal Police, especially in our situation where they are almost exclusively funded by the states. In recent times, Lagos, Niger, Rivers and Delta states have been leading in that respect. Although the Constitution states that there shall be a Nigerian Police Force controlled by the President, in reality the states’ involvement in its operation is there for all to see. The major problem against state-controlled police has always been the possibility of abuse by governors and the past experience in the then Western and Northern Regions. It is my considered opinion that instead of having a poorly-funded federal Police Force with doubted loyalty, it is better to have a fully-funded state police, accountable to the state governor. For now, what we have is a police that is unable to perform its primary role of security of property and life of citizens.

    “The current situation that the military is assisting regularly is not healthy and the public has not been too enthusiastic and would rather they move back to their barracks. For effective policing, local knowledge is very essential and that can be ensured with state policing. The fears expressed can be minimised by professionalism. The greatest threat currently facing Nigeria is local terrorism and kidnapping. Culprits are not spirits. Trust which is essential in policing can be gotten from a kinsman in our tribally divided society. That is another advantage in having a State Police.

    “The point must be made that a constitution can never be a perfect document. It is an organic document meant to endure for a long time. It responds to situations. Whilst the past should guide the future, it should not be a clog in the wheel of progress. Federal government, it must be admitted, is biting more than it can chew. In a balanced federation the most capable organ of government should assume the responsibility. In the case of Nigerian federalism, the Federal government for now is performing below average in certain areas vital to our existence. It will not be cowardice to seek for a relief. The image of a failed or failing state which is starring us in the face is as a result of the perceived and real impression of members of the society that nobody is safe in this country anymore.”

    Prof. Cyril Ndifon of the University of Calabar said: “Why are we always concerned with issues of ownership and control rather than matters of good governance and service delivery? Sadly, to say that this issue is what drives our debates and influences our politics is to state the obvious. It is either someone is talking about control of resources exploited from his area or the funds which accrue to local governments or funds collected by a particular tier of government and put into a joint account. The stories are all the same and too predictable: control, share, share and share, but with nothing to show for it. Indeed, the present debate on the desirability or otherwise of state police fits into the same mould and I must confess that am sick and tired of it.

    “The main problem with policing in Nigeria is that we have failed to realise that the driver of any good product and/or project is measured by the impact it makes on the consumer. If we see policing as a service which must be invariably measured in terms of the quality it can give to the end –consumer- the citizenry, then, our concern should be more on service delivery and less on control and ownership. Who among us would want replicated in our locality the police force ( with all its inefficiency, corruption and failures) we presently have in the country? I guess the answer is obvious.

    “The urgent need of our time is simply to have a police force that is professional both in outlook and content. So, what we need is a reform that will be targeted at addressing structural, institutional and attitudinal challenges. Few of these pressure areas are those that relate to recruitment, nature and content of the curriculum and internal discipline. The training manual must be civilian -friendly and 21st century compliant, especially as regards the human rights content. For recruitment purposes there must be a deliberate policy to undertake an effective background checks.

    “It is clear that there is a strong relation between the quality of candidates and the quality of police personnel, no doubt, a case of cabbage in and cabbage out. Let us realise that we cannot afford to play politics with our security and for those who point to the earlier 60s when regional policing was the norm as an example of good policing need also to be reminded that this period had its downsides. More importantly, some of us have failed to recognise that Nigerians, in particular the young ones, have moved away from that period where ethnic and tribal ties were the basis of doing business or engaging in any relationship (at least not with the high level of inter-ethnic marriages) . Now is the time we search for the true and authentic Nigerian. Politicians Beware!”

    Dr. Samson S. Ameh (SAN) said: “We should maintain the Nigeria Police on the exclusive legislative list of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. The idea of having a state police is a good one but the time is not ripe for it yet. We should remember that Nigeria started as a British colony, indeed a creation by a foreign power and thereby any institution like the Nigeria Police which emphasizes our image as a nation, as one country should be encouraged for now.

    “The argument in favour of State Police is understandable in the sense that with the knowledge of their environment, the State Police will be more efficient and effective in crime detection and investigation. But the disadvantages are more and especially State Police will be subject to abuse by local champions or overloads.

    “The advantages of having State Police; that is, efficiency and effectiveness of crime detection and investigation as a result of local knowledge can equally be achieved administratively in the existing structure of the Nigeria Police. Indeed, there is a policy which I believe to be still in place that as much as possible officers of the rank of Inspector of Police and below should be posted to their local government of origin. By so doing, the advantages of local knowledge or knowledge of the environment will be assessed by such officers who are actually the field men/women in the Nigeria Police who perform the task of crime detection and investigation and not the superior officers.

    “On a last note, I wish to appeal to Nigerians to appreciate the role of the Police in the society. Nigerians should cooperate with the Police in all aspects of their work instead of being skeptical and critical of the Police all the time. We must not stay aloof from the Police because after all police are part of the society.

    “For now, the Police must remain national but for the future and when the time is ripe, State Police is the ideal.”

    Nella Andem-Rabana (SAN) said: “I have no doubt in my mind that decentralisation of the Nigerian Police Force by empowering the states to conduct law enforcement activities statewide is the ultimate way forward. However, whether Nigeria is ready to take that step just yet is the question. My response is: I think not’.

    “Unless Nigeria thinks through the necessary amendments/provisions to be made with   regard to the following: (a) 2011 Constitution (as amended) (b) the Revenue Allocation Formula; and (c) infrastructure, and until it puts into effect those amendments for effective state policing it may not be expedient to whimsically dismantle the existing police structure.

    “The fact that the Nigerian Police Force is under the command of the IGP, an appointee of the President of the Federal Republic, means that all Commissioners of police report directly to him and have limited powers/authority to make on-the-spot or far reaching decisions and in maintaining and securing public safety and order. This is a constitutional matter, which must be expressly addressed in order to discentralise the Police Force.

    “Also of constitutional significance, are matters such as purchase of fire arms, ammunition, explosives, banking, financial crimes, fingerprinting, identification and criminal records, all of which are on the Exclusive Legislative list in the 2011 Constitution (as amended). These matters should be put on the concurrent list to give states necessary and relevant powers to enable them prevent, investigate and prosecute such crimes independent of Federal police. This would give the Federal police the opportunity to concentrate on Federal crimes which would have by then been clearly determined such as, Interstate, cross-border crimes and national security issues.

    “I note also that the 2011 Constitution (as amended) provides that only the National Assembly has power to legislate on Police and criminal matters so the need for amendment to enable the State Houses of Assembly powers to set down modalities for establishing, administering and organizing a state police force is of critical importance.

    “Whether the police force remains as it is or it is decentralised, adequate budgetary provision to meet their operational challenges is a sine qua non but if the states are to set up their Police commands the Revenue sharing Formula has to be revised to give the states more funding to cope with the additional cost of running an effective state police.

    “Meanwhile, strengthening the police to cope with current insecurity in the country requires optimal professionalism. The need for up-to-date technological and scientific expertise, robust and comprehensive criminal justice training especially in areas like psychology, forensic investigation, report writing, handwriting analysis, voice analysis, interrogation, negotiation, fingerprinting analysis, study of bomb composition and disposal, Cybercrime, deep sea diving etc. has to form part of the ongoing training programme.

    “Adequate funding to ensure more strategic infrastructural development such as functional air (helicopters) water (marine boats) and road transport(vehicles) adequate housing (barracks), academies, uniforms, communication gadgets and research laboratories and modern equipment are to be made accessible to all commands.

    “The recruitment process for prospective police officers should be reviewed to benchmark entry into the Police Force at Post Ordinary level qualification and pre-commissioning training should be one year intensive training, which would   cover report writing, basic investigative techniques, criminal justice skills, decorum/grooming and sociably acceptable conduct/attitude to the public as well as physical training.

    “More transparency in the management of the Police Equipment Fund is imperative. These Funds should be used for capital projects such as the purchase of CCTV cameras in strategic locations and highways, provision of helicopters, marine boats, vehicles, and hi-tech equipment throughout the country.

    “It is my belief that under effective governorship; each state Police Force would be able to independently protect its citizens without the unnecessary bureaucratic delays in decision-making, as is presently the case. With unfettered powers of arrest and apprehension they can effectively detect and prevent crime within the state and for offences, which they have no Jurisdiction to prosecute, they would transfer accordingly.”

    Chief James Ogwu Onoja (SAN) said: “To have a State Police will definitely require the amendment of the Nigerian Constitution. That is the smallest of all the problems. I am against the creation of State Police. It is an invitation to anarchy and will surely complicate instead of solving the security problems of this country. Ours is a nation that creates excuses for failures. The creation of State Police is not the prescription for the discontent and inefficiency of our system of policing in Nigeria neither is it an alternative to a well-funded and highly trained police force that can fight crime and corruption head on. Those who are clamoring for State Police have failed to appreciate the history of this country regarding the atrocities of Councils and Emirates police under the colonial administration. Instead of castigating the police force as it is constituted, we need to fund, empower, retrain and give them job security to do their constitutional roles. The citizens of this country should stop running the police down, they should co-operate with police to fight crime, give useful information and expose criminals. Police do not bribe themselves. Corrupt Nigerians bribe the police.

    “Whether we create State Police, Local Government Police, clannish or family Police, they will all police the same corrupt Nigerians, who will eventually claw their effectiveness through institutional corruption and serial neglect. We should be courageous to address the problem of the Nigerian Police; lets stop playing games with our security. Police cannot do magic, they cannot act above their intellectual and institutional capacities, we can only get back what we have invested in them. If you put little in the Police Force, don’t expect a big result. The government, particularly, the politicians are obliged to act as a matter of urgency to improve the capacity of the Nigeria Police or else very soon we would start asking for State Army, State Airforce and Navy. We are the problems, not the institutions. As bad people, we deserve our leadership and all the institutions, the Nigeria Police Force inclusive”.

    For Chief John Ochoga:

    “The Nigeria Police Force is

    the creation of Section 214(1) of the 1999 Constitution as a sole police force for Nigeria. It is headed by the Inspector-General of Police with subordinate officers and commissioners of police in charge of the states.

    “The habit of policing has always been an integral part of human existence since creation. The instinct for human to protect themselves and their acquisitions has always been there, however rudimentary. Since people live in group and communities, there was always the need to check the excesses and aggression of others. The breakdown of individual discipline that endanger the larger society led to various forms of social control ( informal policing), in which members of a community became responsible for their collective protection and security. Rules, norms or custom that guaranteed individual interest but protected the survival of the group as a whole, became formalised.

    “Modern type policing began in London with the establishment of the Metropolitan Police by Sir Robert Peel  in 1829, whereas the Nigerian police force started as a body to meet the British colonial needs. The Consular Guards was established in Lagos in 1861 and later by 1879 became the Hausa Constabulary, an armed force. Subsequently, there was the Northern Nigerian Polic (1886), Royal Niger Constabulary (1888), The Niger Coast Constabulary (1894) and The Southern Nigerian Police Force ( 1906). By 1906, three distinct police forces existed in Nigeria. And in 1930 there were amalgamated thus the present name of The Nigeria Police Force.

    “It is, therefore, clear that our colonial history produced our current policing status. We can therefore not separate our political development from our police force.

    Nigeria’s 1966 political experience of coups, counter-coups, civil war and military regimes have made our democracy “a learning process”, even at the age of 53 years.

    “In northern nigeria, opposing politicians and their lawyers were detained at electoral/pooling unit to ensure nomination forms and documents were not filled against the ruling NPC (Northern people congress). Multi-party democracy was nothing but a big sham.

    “The little success of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has all been wiped out by the electoral fraud machines called State Independent Electoral Commission (SIÈC) nationwide.

    “Nigeria can not remain united and democratic unless democratic elections can be held and sustained. The primordial nature of Nigeria still makes State Police an idea whose time has not come. Our leaders are still emperors in pretentious democratic garbs. The degrees of abuse and their anti-democratic tendencies do not call for state police yet, until we stabilise our democratic culture. Most  of the advocates for state police are local and regional power seekers or people who did to experience our first republic police abuses that influenced the military intervention”.

    “On how to strengthen the existing Police structure to improve their efficiency and the safety and security of life and property of Nigerians, Ochoga said: “We need immediate implementation of the community policing training programme in the states.

    “We need better professional training and equipment of the Nigeria police force, establishment of police command committees at state level to give state governors greater input in security matters with state police commands and formations; Create a culture of service delivery and effective discipline within the police force.”

    Chief Godwin Obla, said: “The discourse on the propriety or otherwise of amendment of the Constitution to allow for state police has clearly revealed the duplicity and insincerity of some Governors especially those from the core North who have incorporated aspects of the Sharia in their legal systems and created apparatus for the enforcement.

    “These are states where the Hisbah an acronym for Islamic police seize alcohol, impose fines, apply lashes as physical punishment in accordance with “Islamic injunctions.” What more evidence of state police do we need?

    “If State Police had existed, the responsibility for apprehending the Boko Haram and similar insurgent organistions would have been on the states. The extent of their complicity or support for these groups would have been obvious.

    “The world has moved on and if we are practising the American style federal system then state and even local government police is a sine qua non. The argument about misuse is as lame as it is disingenuous. We can anticipate possible abuses and put in place legislations to address them. Is the police as constituted not being abused?”

    J. Ihe Amajuoyi, who is Chairman NBA Umuahia branch, said: “I am seriously opposed to the idea of State Police now, not because it is bad per se, but basically because of the use to which our politicians will eventually put it. They will definitely abuse it unless there are strong legal frameworks and dependable assurances to the contrary.”

    On how to strengthen the existing police structure to get the best out of it, Amajuoyi said: “ A very strong reorientation and outright change of the present police force will make it more nationalistic, heal all suspicion and reassure Nigerians that their lives and property are safe”

    Garun Gabbas said: “This is a sensitive, indeed, difficult subject for the simple reason that while it has its advantages, the odds against the option in our very peculiar situation as a nation make it somewhat unworkeable in Nigeria.”

    According to him, some governors have shown a propensity to abuse their powers. Therefore, they could do worse with the police under their control.

    “It will be very unwise to entrust these leaders with the most important aspect of concern to the citizens, I.e. security.

    “Moreso, in certain parts of our country, the fear can be expressed, and rightly so, that state police could even be used by governors to settle religiuos, tribal or sectional scores. For these reasons it is my view that the disadvantages of creating state police far outweigh the benefits.“

  • Why I support state police, by Amaechi

    Why I support state police, by Amaechi

    Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi has said the country will be better policed, the people better secured and crime reduced, if the constitution allows states to have their own police.

    He spoke at the opening of the State Security and Technology Innovation Forum 2012 in Port Harcourt yesterday.

    “We are doing our best to secure the citizens. Our investment in security is very huge, that is why I am an apostle of state police, because if you give us state police, we will do far better,”he said.

    Amaechi urged the Federal Government to fund the police and provide them with the necessary facilities to enable them combat crime across the country.

    “The Federal Government must fund the police. It is not good enough to give them uniforms and they will be walking on the streets, in a community where you have robbers carrying AK-47 rifles.

    “The police are overwhelmed by the number of crimes committed in the country.

    “Police are not being properly funded in Nigeria. Even the man on the street knows.”

    “No matter how you abuse the police, I do not believe that their reward is in heaven, like teachers. Every reward is here on earth. I will continue to pray for you (policemen) to get your reward.

    The governor also said the state has acquired two police security helicopters to provide 24 hours d security network across the state.

    Amaechi called for the collaboration between the government and the private sector to create employment for the citizens, which he explained would reduce the spate of crime in the society.

    “We must realise that one thing is necessary, government and the private sector must fight poverty, because if you don’t create employment, jobs for the citizens, they will create their own jobs, so if we collaborate, the more jobs we create, the lesser the spate of crime in our society.

    “So while we provide physical protection, we must also provide social protection, that is why we are pursuing free education, free healthcare, to reduce funding by parents on their children,” Amaechi added.

     

     

     

  • State police

    The recent report that the President of the Nigeria’s Senate, David Mark is now in support of state police calls for some comments. We do not know the PDP’s position on state police but it seems most of the northern PDP governors are opposed to state police. I have never understood their reasons for this except that they will want the federal government to remain awesomely powerful.

    Supporters of over-concentration of power in the centre see nothing wrong in it being overused. This has been the practice in the past that even a genial and gentle person like Shehu Shagari used the federal police to bulldoze his way in the states of the country that were under the UPN, GNPP and the NPP during the second republic. But times have changed and the security problems in the country have increased geometrically and the Nigerian police and even the Nigerian army have not been able to do much about it. This calls for a total overhaul and a review of the organs responsible for peace keeping and enforcement.

    In the past, we had native authority police (yandoka) and even local government police in the North and the West. It was only in the East that for cultural reasons that there was no local government police during the first republic. It is true that there were attempts to misuse this local police against political opponents in the North and in the West and this was the reason why these forces were abolished and their members absorbed into the Nigerian police force after the coup of January 15, 1966. But a lot of water has passed under the bridge since that time. We now have 36 states and Abuja and the population of Nigeria has grown from the initial 36 million in 1956 to a purported 160 million now. About 50% of Nigeria’s population now lives in urban areas with attendant growth in criminal activities. The economy of Nigeria has more than quadrupled and Nigeria is now closely linked to the international communities with consequent increase in international crimes. Nigeria has also become more sophisticated and the wealth of the country is equally more concentrated in a few hands thus creating problems of inequity and inequality with attendant growth in envy and crime. The number of the proportion of the young under 35 to those above 35years is probably in the ratio of 60 to 40 and many of the young people are unemployed and unemployable thus swelling the population of the disgruntled elements in the society.

    In short, our society is primed for crime and the challenge is for our government to react appropriately to this. Nigeria is a federation and like all federations all over the world, maintenance of peace must be concurrently pursued by the states and the federal government. In most civilized parts of the world, policing is not only a matter for government at the center but it also involves regional, local, city and county authorities. In the United States that we like to compare ourselves with, there is the Federal Bureau of Investigation; there are state police, county police, city police and sometimes campus police in many of their universities. These organizations work hand in hand in order to preserve peace and they have their jurisdiction properly demarcated. Interstate crimes are handled by the FBI while the local crimes are handled by the state police or city police. They all share information and work hand in hand for the interest of the people. I do not see why the same thing cannot happen here. State, local and city police would of course recruit people with the knowledge of the local areas and local language. This would give them intelligence advantages that are fundamental in policing.

    Critics of local police and advocates of federal police on the grounds of funding are totally mistaken because right now most states contribute equipment and money in support of the federal police assigned to their states. Recently I had an experience in the problem of federal policing. There was a crisis in Ekiti State University. We had information that students might riot and destroy university properties. We alerted the state police commissioner who said he could do nothing unless the Inspector General of Police orders him to. We had to alert the state governor who in theory is the chief security officer of the state and he had to call the IGP to give orders to the commissioner of police to protect his state. While we were going back and forth, the students invaded the university and destroyed facilities worth hundreds of millions. If our governor was in control of the police in his state, this unnecessary chaos would have been avoided. This is a practical example of how our current policy is not working. Lives are being lost in the process of this bureaucratic rigmarole while our leaders are busy disputing the limit of power of federal and state police.

    On the question of misuse, we have the judiciary to rein in any attempt to misuse state police. In fact, we are more in danger of misuse of centralized police power as has been done in the past and is still being done today as I write. We are supposed to be a federation. A situation in which police federally recruited and consisting in most cases of people not speaking the language of the areas where they are deployed is totally unacceptable. It is the continuation of the divide et imperia of the old colonial system where southern soldiers and police were deployed in the north while northern police and soldiers were deployed to the south so that there will be no sympathy for the locals by the colonial police and army. Is this what we want to continue in the 21st century of heightened awareness of cultural nationalism? This is not working in Nigeria and the more we bind ourselves together by force, the more resentful people will get. The result is the kind of resentment leading to problem against non-natives every time there is a misunderstanding or accident involving people of different tongues. We have to be realistic in this country. Our founding fathers knew the fundamental differences of our society and that was why they opted for the federal system of government with all that goes with it, namely separate and coordinate police, judiciary, civil service etc.

    In the words of Sir Ahmadu Bello, ‘‘we cannot forget our differences, we must understand them”.

  • Nigeria not ripe for state police – Maku

    Nigeria not ripe for state police – Maku

    The Minister of Information, Labaran Maku, said on Tuesday that Nigeria was not ripe for state police.

    Some governors have continued to clamour for state police, using the argument that the step would empower them, as chief executives of their states, to effectively secure their domains.

    But Maku, who led the national good governance tour team, currently in Plateau, to a visit to the Police Staff College, in the outskirts of Jos, said that the nation lacked adequate facilities to handle that.

    He said the nation’s police force was doing well in spite of the enormous challenges, stressing that advocates of state police had never looked at the area of training.

    “Training is key to success, unfortunately those asking for state police have not looked at that area, “the News Agency of Nigeria quoted the minister as saying during the visit.

    He rejected incessant allegations of corruption slapped on the police by members of the public, and declared that there was no human institution that may not host some bad eggs from within it.

    In his remarks, the Commandant of the college, Mr. Bala Hassan, said that 53 intervention projects were being carried out in the institution.

    He expressed optimism that the projects would address the challenges of the 36-year old college.

     

  • Aregbesola, Okiro disagree over state police

    Aregbesola, Okiro disagree over state police

    •Falana, Oyebode decry lopsided federalism

    Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola and former Police Inspector-General Mike Okiro yesterday disagreed over the necessity for state police as an essential element of true federalism.

    Aregbesola, who called for devolution of powers, decried the lack of control over the police by the state chief security officers. Okiro, who canvassed devolution of police control to the Deputy Inspectors-General, said state police would be abused by governors.

    However, Lagos lawyer Femi Falana (SAN), Prof. Akin Oyebode and Mr. Opeyemi Agbaje said that true federalism would remain an illusion in the absence of state police.

    The Osun State governor and Okiro spoke at a debate on the policing system held in Lagos. The theme of the discussion organised by MC Connect, a public relations firm, is: “State police: To be or not to be”.

    Other speakers at the event, which was held at the Agip Recital Hall, Muson Centre, Onikan were Dr. Tam George and Chairman of Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Ikeja branch, Mr. Onyekachi Ubani and a social commentator Mr. Opeyemi Agbaje.

    Aregbesola, who was represented by his Commissioner for Physical Planning, Muyiwa Ige, described state police as a lingering issue that had troubled Nigeria’s federalism. He said the federal police had been repeatedly used for election rigging, repression of opposition and quelling legitimate protests.

    He claimed that, if law making, agriculture, education and health are enshrined in the Concurrent List, governors who receive security votes monthly should have control over the police.

    Dismissing the fear of likely abuse of state police by governors as baseless, Aregbesola pointed out that the federal police is also susceptible to abuse.

    The governor canvassed community policing, stressing that it is unhelpful to draft people from several kilometres away to police a given environment.

    He said: “It is wrong for commissioners of police to decline the directives of governors and invade his territory with mobile policemen. In the United States, there is the Federal Bureau of Information (FBI), but there are state, local government and even police on the campuses. State police is good for federalism”.

    But Okiro, who retired in 2009, disagreed with the governor, emphasising that it is premature to establish state police because governors would abuse the security agency.

    He also said that states lack adequate resources to fund state police because they depend on federal allocations for survival. Okiro also said that community police would throw up indigenes in the police who would be used to oppress non-indigenes.

    Okiro favoured the decentralisation of police, but suggested that police powers should be devolved to the DIGs.

    The former Inspector-General said: “Some lingering constitutional issues should be settled first before creating state police. Governors are fighting for absolute control of police to coerce opponents to dance to their will. If we don’t have effective federal police, we cannot have effective state police.

    “Desperation for power, when it is not moderated, creates insecurity. Governors who wake up one morning, suspend council chairmen and councillors and appoint their stooges will do worse things, if there is state police.”

    Dr. George, who supported Okiro’s view, said governors were clamouring for autonomy from the centre which they are reluctant to give to the local governments.

    Falana, however, objected to the former Inspector-General’s position, stressing that decentralisation of the police is a key element of federalism.

    Dismissing the fear of likely abuse of state police, he added: “It is an indolent approach. They argue that we are mature to use private jets and jeeps, but we are not mature for state police. All those who are opposed to a decentralised police are heavily guarded by the police. But the mases are left without security. When you get to State Houses, you think you are in police barracks. 419 kingpins even have police escorts and riders.

    “Their argument is diversionary. We should end controlled and regulated federalism. We must address the fear of those who believe that governors will use state police to intimidate and oppress their opponents. The fear of ethnicity is also unfounded. When they loot our money, they don’t talk about ethnicity. But when it is state police, they say it will subvert nationhood.”

    Falana called for the democratisation of police control, adding that no President or governor should appoint the Inspector-General and commissioners of police. He said the task should be handled by an expanded body that is representative of the people.

    Prof. Oyebode observed that the current police structure mirrored the defective federalism which had foisted a crisis of nation-building on Nigeria.

    He said: “You call governors chief security officers, but they cannot exercise power over police. He has to plead with the IG for help. Militarism and federalism are hot bed fellows. It appears some people are feeding fat on the present structure.”

    Ubani supported state police, saying that strong institutions with clearly defined powers and limits would check its excesses.

    He said the fear about state police funding is unfounded, pointing out that governors are currently supplying equipment to the distressed police.

    Ubani added :” Under former Military President Ibrahim Babangida, they said private radio and television were dangerous. They said it would lead to strife and deepen tribal sentiment. Today, we have freedom to tune to stations of our choice. They say governors cannot fund the police. But they buy vehicles, office equipment and helicopters for them in Lagos and Rivers. Governors can fund police. They should stop stealing money and there will be money to run the system.”

    Agbaje, who also supported state police, said that would herald effective and efficient policing system.

    He lamented that 12 northern governors were opposing state police after enacting Sharia law and created Hisba, which is a de-facto police to enforce the Islamic law.

    Agbaje added: “ Police is similar to NEPA and NITEL. Why saddling a single agency with the task of policing Nigeria? Police is an unwanted monopoly. If Nigeria could liberalise NEPA and NITEL, we should not continue with the dysfunctional system of a single, federal police. It is a constitutional aberration. Even in unitary Britain, their police is decentralised.

    “Federal Government makes laws and have police to enforce them. The states and local governments make laws, but lack powers of enforcement. Laws that cannot be enforced is a worthless proclamation.”

     

  • Atilade kicks  against state police

    Atilade kicks against state police

    •Seeks abolition of Senate

    The country will boil in no time if the clamour for state police becomes a reality, Chairman South West region of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Archbishop Magnus Atilade, has declared.

    Nigeria, he said, is unripe and unprepared to operate a police structure under the control of state governments.

    Atilade said politicians will seize advantage of the situation to suppress their opponents, thereby creating a tensed situation.He spoke last week with reporters in Lagos.

    According to him: “As a student in UI then, we went to the North and were shocked by the powers of Alkali police. “If we have state police, we will be in troubles.

    We should find another way of diffusing power from the centre but we should never ask that states should have direct control over police officers.” He acknowledged state police structure is the best for a complex nation as Nigeria but expressed worries over the political maturity to make it work.

    He added many Nigerians will be victimized outside their states, saying the dichotomy between the South and the North will not help either.

    The President of Gospel Baptist Conference of Nigeria and Overseas (GBCN) also called for reduction in cost of governance, saying the first way out is to disband the Senate.

    His words: “What purpose is it serving again? We already have the State Assemblies and Federal House of Representatives. Why the senate again? “We should let it go and I challenge anybody to a public debate on how helpful the senate has been.”