Tag: tax reform

  • Presidency: Tax reform bills not anti-north, aimed at economic growth

    Presidency: Tax reform bills not anti-north, aimed at economic growth

    • …debunks claims of scrapping key agencies in tax reform 

    The Presidency has categorically refuted claims that the proposed tax reform bills will undermine the economy of any region, particularly the North. 

    It rather emphasized that the reforms are designed to streamline tax administration and promote equitable economic development across the nation.

    The Presidency has also refuted widespread claims suggesting that the proposed tax reform bills before the National Assembly recommend the dissolution of key federal agencies. 

    Recent debates surrounding the tax reform bills proposed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration have generated significant misinformation, with some critics presenting misleading claims. 

    There have been claims that the reforms disproportionately benefit states like Lagos and Rivers, potentially impoverishing northern states. 

    Some northern governors have expressed concerns, particularly about changes in the Value Added Tax (VAT) sharing formula, viewing it as detrimental to their region’s economic stability. 

    One other prominent allegation is that the bills aim to dissolve key government agencies like the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI), Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND), and National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA). 

    Critics suggested these agencies would lose their funding and cease to operate by 2029, an assertion that the presidency has strongly refuted.

    However, the government clarified that the reforms aim to simplify tax administration, reduce the burden on businesses, and ensure equitable revenue distribution among states, with provisions for equalization transfers to maintain fairness.

    Another contentious issue is the perceived introduction of excessive taxes amidst existing economic hardships. 

    Critics argue that these changes might exacerbate the financial burden on Nigerians. 

    Read Also: Atiku calls for transparency, equity in Tax Reform Bills debates

    The government counters that the reforms will exempt many low-income earners from taxation and streamline the taxation process to support vulnerable businesses and individuals.

    However, in a statement issued on Monday by Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, the Presidency said contrary to misinformation, the reforms do not target northern states or prioritize wealthier regions such as Lagos and Rivers. 

    Instead, the bills aim to simplify Nigeria’s complex tax framework, easing the burden on businesses and fostering an environment conducive to investment and growth. 

    It also emphasized that no provision in the bills seeks to abolish institutions NASENI, TETFUND, and NITDA. 

    The Presidency criticized commentators for spreading inaccurate claims and inflaming regional tensions. 

    According to the statement, the reforms are aimed at improving Nigeria’s economic environment, not at enriching certain states or impoverishing others.

    The proposed reforms include consolidating multiple taxes currently imposed on businesses into a single tax, a move intended to simplify tax administration and reduce the financial burden on companies. 

    The statement highlighted that businesses in Nigeria have long struggled under the weight of numerous taxes, which have hampered growth, deterred investment, and, in some cases, forced companies to relocate to more favorable markets.

    Under the new framework, affected agencies such as NASENI, TETFUND, and NITDA will continue to receive funding through budgetary allocations and a phased sharing of the consolidated tax revenue until 2030. 

    This approach, the Presidency argued, is consistent with global best practices, where government agencies are funded through general taxation rather than earmarked levies.

    The statement urged public figures and stakeholders to base their comments on factual interpretations of the bills, rather than using unfounded claims to polarize the nation or mislead citizens. 

    It called on all Nigerians, including leaders in various sectors, to contribute constructively during upcoming public hearings organized by the National Assembly to discuss the tax proposals.

    President Bola Tinubu reiterated the urgency of reforming Nigeria’s outdated tax system to foster economic growth and development. 

    According to the statement, the proposed changes are essential for creating a more competitive and equitable economic landscape for all Nigerians.

    “Since the public debate around the transformative tax bills before the National Assembly began in the last few weeks, various political actors and commentators have tried to obfuscate the facts, deliberately misinforming and misleading the public. 

    “Unfortunately, most reactions are not grounded in facts, reality, or sufficient knowledge of the bills. While some commentators have attempted to incite the people against lawmakers, others have polarized one section of the country against another.

    “The tax reform bills will not make Lagos or Rivers more affluent and other parts of the country, as recklessly canvassed, poorer. The bills will not destroy the economy of any section of the country. Instead, they aim to enhance the quality of life for Nigerians, especially the disadvantaged, who are trying to make a living.

    “Contrary to the lies being peddled, the bills do not suggest that NASENI, TETFUND, and NITDA will cease to exist in 2029 after the passage of the bills.

    “Government agencies, such as NASENI, TETFUND, and NITDA, are funded through budgetary provisions with company income tax and other taxes paid by the same businesses that are being overburdened with the special taxes. 

    “One reason President Bola Tinubu embarked on the Tax and Fiscal Policy Reforms is the need to streamline tax administration in Nigeria and make the operating environment conducive for businesses. 

    “For decades, businesses, investors, and private sector players in Nigeria have complained of being overburdened by a myriad of taxes and levies, including those earmarked to fund various government agencies and initiatives. 

    “The multiple taxes complicate the economic environment, making Nigeria uncompetitive for investment and preventing many businesses from growing or continuing their operations. Some companies have had to make the rational decision to relocate to other countries. We can not continue on this path or wait for 20 years if this country is to deliver the prosperity we need for our people. 

    “The proposal, as contained in section 59(3) of the Nigeria Tax Bill, only seeks to consolidate some of the earmarked taxes imposed on companies and replace them with a single tax to be shared with the key agencies as beneficiaries in a phased manner until 2030.

    “The time frame offers ample opportunity for the affected agencies to explore other funding sources in addition to budgetary allocations in line with the constitution and international best practices. 

    “It is a misrepresentation of facts to conclude that changing an agency’s funding source amounts to scrapping it. None of the countries leading globally in education, science, engineering, or information technology have similar earmarked taxes. 

    “The government imposes major taxes, be it income tax, consumption tax, or other taxes, to channel resources to its areas of priority at the time. Imposing a separate tax to fund an agency is an aberration that has yet to yield results despite the huge burden on businesses. The tax bill seeks to address this problem. 

    “Relevant stakeholders and public analysts owe it a duty to properly educate themselves about the bills’ contents and avoid misleading the public for any reason. We may be entitled to our opinions, but such views must be informed and based on facts, not emotions targeted at inflaming passions.

    “In a period like this, when our people across the country look up to leaders for guidance and direction on matters of public importance, such as the Tax Reform Bills, leaders should be more measured in their public utterances to avoid heating the polity and polarising the country unduly. 

    “President Tinubu welcomes the public interest these bills have generated. He encourages leaders across the country, including Governors, Traditional rulers, Civil Society Activists, Students, trade associations, professional associations, and the general public, to take advantage of the Public Hearings that the National Assembly will organise to present their views on how best to reform our taxes and fiscal regime. 

    “What is never in doubt is the imperative of changing the existing tax laws and administration that have become obsolete and unhelpful in achieving the growth and development we desire for our country”, the statement said.

  • Why we postponed debate on Tax reform bills, by Reps spokesman

    Why we postponed debate on Tax reform bills, by Reps spokesman

    Spokesman of the House of Representatives, Akintunde Rotimi said on Monday that the House decided to postpone the schedule debate on the tax reform bills to allow for more consultations by members. 

    The House at plenary on Thursday, Nov.ember 28, had scheduled a debate on the tax bills presented to the National Assembly which has generated some level of controversy around the country. 

    Northern leaders, including traditional rulers, governors and some lawmakers have argued that the bills will undermine the development band growth of the north if passed, while the 36 governors asked for the withdrawal. 

    But the Senate has passed the bills for  second reading, while the House had said that it will debate the bills on Tuesday, December 3 after giving members opportunitybtir more! Consultation. 

    Read Also: Tax reform, opportunity for North to be innovative – Arewa Think Tank

    However, in a last minute memo to members, Clerk to the House, Yahaya Danzaria announced that the special. Session to discuss the bills as be postponed to a later date ‘”due to the need for further and broader consultations with all relevant stakeholders”.

    The Nation gathered that some members of the House who were scheduled to travel outside Abuja for oversight functions had to cancel the trip to be part of the scheduled session as members mobilise to take positions on the bills. 

    Responding to an inquiry on monday evening, Rotimi confirmed the postponement of the session, saying it was postponed “to allow for further consultations before the debate comes up.”

  • 23 surprising facts about Tinubu’s Tax Reform that could change everything

    23 surprising facts about Tinubu’s Tax Reform that could change everything

    • By Achimi muktar

    Discover how it affects food prices, school fees, and more

    The tax reform bills proposed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu have ignited a fierce debate across Nigeria. While critics and supporters clash, many remain unaware of the sweeping changes these reforms aim to introduce. From slashing taxes for small businesses to easing the financial burden on low-income earners, here’s everything you need to know—explained in plain terms.

    What’s the Fuss About?

    President Tinubu recently sent four tax-related bills to the National Assembly. These include:

    Nigeria Tax Bill

    Nigeria Tax Administration Bill

    Nigeria Revenue Service Establishment Bill

    Joint Revenue Board Establishment Bill

    While these bills seek to modernize Nigeria’s outdated tax laws, they’ve also stirred controversy, with governors and regional leaders sparring over revenue sharing and fairness.

    Here’s the good news: the reforms are designed to benefit everyday Nigerians, especially the poor and small businesses. Here are 23 things you probably didn’t know about Tinubu’s tax reforms:

    1. Income Tax Relief for Low Earners

    If you earn ₦800,000 or less annually, you’ll no longer pay income tax—saving ₦84,000 yearly.

    2. Higher Threshold for Maximum Tax Rates

    Only those earning above ₦50 million will pay a 25% income tax rate, unlike the current threshold of ₦3.2 million.

    3. Small Business Tax Exemptions

    Businesses with turnovers below ₦50 million won’t pay income tax—a jump from the current ₦25 million threshold.

    4. Reduction in Corporate Tax Rates

    Medium and large companies will see corporate taxes drop from 30% to 25% by 2026.

    5. Elimination of ‘Minimum Tax’

    Companies that fail to declare profits will no longer face a mandatory 1% gross earnings tax.

    6. Lower Burden on Big Firms

    A new 2% development levy replaces the current 3.75% in additional taxes—directly funding student loans from 2030.

    7. Changes to VAT Sharing Formula

    States will now receive 55% of VAT revenue, up from 50%, while the federal government’s share drops from 15% to 10%.

    8. Progressive VAT Increase

    VAT rates will rise gradually from 7.5% today to 15% by 2030—but basic necessities like food and medicine remain exempt.

    9. Affordable Food and Essentials

    No VAT will be charged on food items, electricity, school fees, or medical services, ensuring prices stay low for the poor.

    10. Investment Incentives in Gas

    Tax breaks encourage both associated and non-associated gas projects to boost energy supply.

    Revolutionizing Tax Administration

    The Nigeria Tax Administration Bill introduces new ways to ensure compliance and fairness:

    11. Catching Tax Evaders

    High spenders (₦25 million/month for individuals, ₦100 million/month for businesses) are flagged for tax audits via bank records.

    12. Payment Flexibility

    Taxes assessed in foreign currencies can now be paid in Naira at official exchange rates.

    13. Streamlined Collections

    The Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) will take over tax collection from agencies like Customs, enabling regulatory bodies to focus on oversight.

    14. Tax Refund Guarantees

    Funds for verified tax refunds will be deducted from collections to ensure prompt payments.

    Empowering Local Governments and Simplifying Taxes

    Read Also: Tinubu calls for unified African military front to combat insecurity

    The Joint Revenue Board Establishment Bill is equally transformative:

    15. Local Revenue Committees

    LGAs will manage taxes, fines, and rates within their jurisdictions to boost efficiency.

    16. Harmonized Offenses and Penalties

    Tax laws will now have uniform penalties to improve compliance nationwide.

    17. Dispute Resolution

    A Tax Appeal Tribunal will settle disputes, including disagreements over residency for tax purposes.

    18. Taxpayer Advocacy

    A Tax Ombudsman Office will help citizens seek justice if treated unfairly by tax authorities.

    Why This Matters

    Proponents of Tinubu’s reforms argue they are pro-poor, pro-growth, and pro-efficiency. With exemptions for low-income earners and small businesses, alongside incentives for local economic activities, these bills aim to reduce Nigeria’s reliance on oil revenue while fostering a fairer, more inclusive tax system.

    What’s next?

    The bills have passed the Second Reading in the Senate and now await public hearings. While the debate rages on, analysts agree: if implemented correctly, these reforms could transform Nigeria’s tax ecosystem and uplift millions of Nigerians.

  • BREAKING: Senate passes Tax Reform Bills for second reading

    BREAKING: Senate passes Tax Reform Bills for second reading

    The Senate on Thursday, November 28, passed for a second reading the proposed four tax reform bills by the federal government.

    The resolution of the Senate followed its consideration of the general principles of the Bills during plenary.

    The leader of the Senate, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, sponsored the Bills.

    The four bills include: “A Bill for an Act to Establish the Joint Revenue Board, the Tax Appeal Tribunal and the Office of the Tax Ombudsman for the harmonization, coordination, and settlement of disputes arising from revenue administration in Nigeria and for related matters, 2024

    “A Bill for an Act to Repeal the Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, No.13, 2007 and enact the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act to Establish the Nigeria Revenue Service, charged with powers of assessment, collection of, and accounting for revenue accruable to the Government of the Federation, and for related matters, 2024.

    Read Also: FUOYE Senate passes vote of confidence in VC Fasina

    “A Bill for an Act to Provide for the assessment, collection of, and accounting for revenue accruing to the Federation, Federal, States, and Local Governments; prescribe the powers and functions of tax authorities, and for related matters, 2024.

    “A Bill for an Act to Repeal certain Acts on taxation and consolidate the legal frameworks relating to taxation and enact the Nigeria Tax Act to provide for taxation of income, transactions, and instruments, and for related matters, 2024.”

    After the second reading of the Bills, the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio referred them to the Senate Committee on Finance for further legislative action and to report back to the Senate in six weeks.

    Details shortly…

  • Ningi, Ndume fail to stop Tax Reform Bills’ briefing

    Ningi, Ndume fail to stop Tax Reform Bills’ briefing

    A mild drama ensued on the floor of the Senate yesterday as members of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s economic team honoured the invitation to explain the tax reform bills.

    The Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Zaccheus Adedeji, Director-General of the Budget Office, Tanimu Yakubu and Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, Taiwo Oyedele rallied Senators support for the bill.

    The drama played out when Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, under matters of urgent public importance and relying on Rule 12 (1) of the Senate Standing Orders, moved a motion that the floor privileges be suspended to allow ‘strangers’ into the chambers during plenary.

    He explained that the ‘strangers’ included Adedeji, Yakubu and two others to explain the Tax Reforms Bills before the National Assembly to Senators and Nigerians at home.

    He also informed senators that the House of Representatives had undertaken a similar exercise to enable lawmakers understand the Bills before they are presented for consideration.

    However, coming under the same order, Senator Abdul Ningi (PDP Bauchi) said the ‘strangers’ cannot be admitted into the chambers because they are not part of personalities listed on the Order Paper.

    Read Also: Drama in Senate as FIRS Boss, Oyedele, DG Budget, Yakubu, seek lawmakers’ support for tax reform bills

    However, Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin, who presided over plenary said the Senate Leader called for suspension of the said Order rather than invoking it.

    He, however called on the Senate Leader to cite the relevant additional Order to buttress his motion.

    Bamidele invoked Rule 1(b) of the Senate Standing Orders which gives the Senate powers to regulate its proceedings where there is no relevant rule to support its actions.

    At this point, the Minority Leader, Abba Moro (PDP Benue), seconded Bamidele’s motion.

    Senator Ali Ndume (APC Borno) citing Order 38 opposed the move, saying invitation of the experts to address senators was not reflected on the Order Paper for the day.

  • Tax Reform Bill: VAT as a consumption tax

    Tax Reform Bill: VAT as a consumption tax

    • By Aderonke Atoyebi

    People have been talking about the proposed bill, discussing its potential, the concerns, and the necessary changes it could bring to Nigeria’s tax system. The Tax Reform Bill, with its proposed shift in the VAT derivation formula, is no small matter. The reform has the power to reshape Nigeria’s tax system and, by extension, its economy. It promises to address long-standing issues within Nigeria’s tax structure, with a focus on making the VAT distribution process more equitable for all regions.

    During a recent session at the House of Representatives on the proposed tax reform bills, Dr. Zacch Adedeji, Executive Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), presented an insightful case for restructuring the Value Added Tax (VAT) derivation formula. His explanation highlighted both the advantages of the reform. The Tax Boss explained that VAT is fundamentally a consumption tax, and as such, it should reflect where goods and services are consumed rather than where transactions are recorded.

    Under the current VAT framework, revenue is allocated based on the location of corporate headquarters or business operations rather than where actual consumption takes place. This approach has resulted in states like Lagos, Rivers, and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) receiving a disproportionate share of VAT revenue. For instance, Lagos currently accounts for 42%, Rivers 16%, and the FCT 9% of the nation’s VAT collections. Meanwhile, states such as Borno and Bauchi receive less than half a percent each.

    One of the primary benefits of the new VAT derivation formula is the potential for a more equitable distribution of tax revenue. The current system heavily favours states with high production capacities, such as Lagos and Rivers, leaving other regions with far less. This has created an imbalance where wealthier states continue to prosper while others struggle with fewer resources. The shift to a consumption-based formula means that revenue will be distributed based on where goods and services are consumed, not where they are produced. This change could be especially beneficial for states with large populations but lower production capacities, ensuring that all Nigerians, regardless of where they live, have access to improved public services and infrastructure.

    Read Also: I won’t give up on impactful projects in FCT despite criticism – Wike

    By distributing VAT revenue more evenly, the reform will help bridge the development gap between regions. States that have been marginalized due to their low consumption rates would see an increase in their share of the national revenue. This would allow them to invest in sectors such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, which are essential for improving the quality of life for their residents. The reform also has the potential to promote national unity. By ensuring that all states receive a fair share of VAT revenue, the government could reduce feelings of regional inequality.

    A concern with the reform is that states like Lagos and Rivers, which currently bring in the most VAT revenue, may see a decrease in their share under the new formula. This could strain their budgets and lead to delays or reductions in public services and key projects. However, while these states may face some short-term challenges, they have the means to adjust over time. In the long run, the goal of the reform is to share the country’s wealth more fairly, which will benefit all states, including those that generate the most revenue.

    Under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, Dr. Zacch Adedeji is not just tackling the current problems between regions, but also offering solutions that will help the country grow steadily and stay united in the long run. His goal is to create a Nigeria where all regions have the chance to succeed equally, which is necessary for a better future for everyone in the country.

    •Arabinrin Aderonke is the technical assistant on broadcast media to the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue

  • Tax Reform: We consulted state governors, other stakeholders, says Taiwo Oyedele

    Tax Reform: We consulted state governors, other stakeholders, says Taiwo Oyedele

    Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, said on Monday, November 18, that the Committee consulted the Nigeria Governors Forum, the Nigeria Economic Council, Civil Society Organizations, and a wide range of Nigerians before arriving at tax reform bills currently before the National Assembly.

    Oyedele, who spoke at an interactive session on the tax reform bill organised by the House of Representatives, also explained the idea of increasing the derivation was to give all states equal and fair opportunity and not to give any state any advantage.

    He explained that the bills were not aimed to undermine any region of the country, adding that the current VAT policy requires all companies to pay VAT from their headquarters which he said confer undue advantage on some states.

    He said the Presidential Committee interfaces with all shades of Nigerians, adding that the committee received submissions from all the 36 states of the Federation and the Federal Capital.

    At the end of a meeting of the National Economic Council, governors of the state had asked the President to withdraw the tax reform bills to allow for more consultation in the interest of the while leaders of three North also kicked against the passage of the bills by the National Assembly.

    He said one of the proposed laws aimed to bring all tax laws into one while harmonising all the taxes which he argued has stunted the growth of the nation’s economy.

    Speaking specifically on the payment and sharing of VAT resources, he explained that currently, under Section 40 of the current VAT Act law, VAT revenue is allocated 15 percent to the Federal Government, 50 percent to the States and FCT, and 35 percent to Local Governments

    He said further that the proposed law seeking a reduction of the federal government’s share of VAT while proposing that companies paying VAT should now make their return based on where the services being taxed were carried out.

    He said: “For example, the current law requires that MTN makes its VAT return from its head office in Lagos. But what we are proposing is that such a return should be made based on the location where the calls were made. That will allow smooth computation of the derivation. “

    He said further that the various states believe that VAT should be collected by them which explains why states like Lagos and Rovers have enacted their own VAT laws, saying the VAT policy cannot work well if the states are allowed to collect VAT.

    Oyedele said currently, Nigeria has eight sources of revenue which include “Personal Income Tax, property tax, stamp duties, value added tax and land. These five are mostly being collected by states while the other three are shared among federal, state, and local governments. These are corporate income tax, customs duties, and petroleum and solid minerals revenue.

    “The sad news is that every single one of these eight is significantly underperforming, while the good news is that every single one of those eight is yet an opportunity to change the narrative”.

    He explained that the nation’s budget was very small while expressing regret that the country could not raise enough money to finance its small budget despite its size.

    He said: “Our budget is small. What is even smaller is our revenue. The entire revenue that was generated in 2023 is about N17.5 trillion which is less than 20 billion dollars. What that means is that our small budget is financed by borrowing because we cannot even raise enough money to finance a small budget.

    “The truth is that the 36 states and FCT collected N1.6 trillion as personal income tax in 2023, while South Africa collected about 50.5 trillion naira equivalent of personal income tax that same year. What South Africa collected as personal income tax in one year alone is more than our entire revenue multiplied by two.

    “Even Kenya which is a small country compared to Nigeria generated 5.8 trillion naira in personal income tax alone, which is almost four times what Nigeria collected, yet our population is four times the size of their population.

    “In 2023, Nigeria collected N3.2 trillion from Customs. In that same year, Kenya collected 8.9 trillion naira. If you look at the value of what we import and what Kenya imports, they imported 23 billion dollars worth of imports, while Nigeria imported 66 billion dollars worth of imports.

    “We imported almost three times what Kenya imported and collected one-third of what Kenya collected. Something is not adding up and we must fix those problems if we must move forward as a country.

    “The tax system lacks proper structure. We have obsolete laws which we are still amending. We have laws, but we are not respecting the laws.

    “We have about 60 official tax laws which we have approved in Nigeria as a country. What other countries have approved is less than 10. The solution to our problems can never be to keep introducing new taxes. Rather, it is to get rid of the multiple taxes and maximise collection. As high as the number is, the unofficial ones are even more.

    “First, we want to do away with those taxes that yield low income because they place a lot of burden on poor people and small businesses. Secondly, is to focus on high revenue-yielding taxes that are broad-based and easy to collect. We want a situation where we are able to institutionalise these reforms so that it will be difficult for anybody to undo them”.

    The tax reform, he said further “It is also to ensure simplicity to ensure global best practice. This bill, the Nigeria Tax Bill is trying to help us bring all our tax laws into one book so that you can just go to that tax law and find the taxes you need to pay

    “We have recommended payment of tax by companies that make losses. The way the law is made today, you are making the companies pay tax on their capital and that is the fastest way to kill a business.

    “We proposed that there should be an income from where you get capital gain tax. This will address the abuse of the tax regime. Reduce company income tax from 30 to 25 percent

    “We also have a proposal to collapse all taxes into one single tax called development levy from where the money will now be distributed to the other agencies that we feel need that revenue. We feel that over time, all agencies of government should be funded from the budget. We don’t think any agency should be collecting their own taxes and running their government.

    “The current system of VAT imposes a tax on basic consumption. A lot of the food you buy in Nigeria today has hidden VAT. We are proposing a 0 VAT on food. 82 percent of the income of Nigerians is spent on food, education, and health care. So, why should you be taxing the basic things that Nigerians need to survive?

    Read Also: Can Wale Edun, Yemi Cardoso, Taiwo Oyedele save the Nigerian economy?

    “A lot of states have consumption tax written in different names. We are proposing that the VAT system should be allowed to work and let everybody discontinue every other form of consumption tax in the interest of our people.

    “Nigeria is running on a low budget. For 2024, the budget of the federal government, including the supplementary appropriation which added about N6 trillion, the budget came to about N35 trillion, while all the states combined was N15 trillion and if you add the entire budget of Nigeria, it comes to about N51.1 trillion.

    “If you convert that, it comes up to about 13 billion dollars which is equivalent to the budget of Kenya with about 54 million people and less than one quarter of the budget of South Africa. The South African budget for 2024 is equivalent to 150 billion dollars, with a little of 60 million people.

    “How come that despite our size, intellectual capacity, and population, our budget is still the same things like that of Kenya.”

  • Presidential aide addresses misconceptions on tax reform

    Presidential aide addresses misconceptions on tax reform

    Mr Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, has addressed the misconceptions surrounding the tax reform initiated by the current administration.

    He noted that the Northern Governors’ Forum on Oct. 28, led by Gov. Muhammed Inuwa Yahaya of Gombe State, expressed opposition to the new derivation-based model for Value-Added Tax (VAT) distribution in the tax reform bills before the National Assembly.

    He said the meeting also had traditional rulers from the region in attendance, led by Muhammadu Sa’ad Abubakar III, the Sultan of Sokoto, Onanuga said this in a statement on Thursday in Abuja.

    He explained that the tax reform bills, endorsed by President Bola Tinubu and the Federal Executive Council, aimed to streamline Nigeria’s tax administration processes, enhance efficiency, and eliminate redundancies.

    “These reforms emerged after an extensive review of existing tax laws. The National Assembly is considering four executive bills designed to transform and modernise Nigeria’s tax landscape.

    “First is the Nigeria Tax Bill, which aims to eliminate unintended multiple taxation and make Nigeria’s economy more competitive by simplifying tax obligations for businesses and individuals nationwide.

    “Second, the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill (NTAB) proposes new rules governing the administration of all taxes in the country.

    “Its objective is to harmonise tax administrative processes across federal, state and local jurisdictions for ease of compliance for taxpayers in all parts of the country,” he said.

    According to him, the third bill, the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill, seeks to rename the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) as the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS).

    Onanuga assured that the reforms would not increase taxes, lead to job losses, or absorb existing departments’ duties, instead, they aimed to optimise and simplify tax frameworks, ensuring a more equitable distribution of tax obligations.

    He said the reforms also sought to consolidate multiple taxes into a unified structure, reducing administrative fragmentation.

    Read Also: Still on Tinubu’s economic tax reform

    Regarding the proposed derivation-based VAT distribution model, Onanuga explained that the new proposal aimed to create a fairer system, considering the place of supply or consumption for relevant goods and services.

    He said the reform would benefit states in the Northern region that produced VAT-exempt goods, ensuring they did not lose out on revenue.

    “These reforms are crucial to improving Nigerians’ lives and were not intended to undermine any part of the country, Onanuga stated.

    He said the bills would overhaul the country’s tax systems, generating revenue for all tiers of government to fund development projects.

    (NAN)