Tag: Tax

  • Tax matters

    Tax matters

    Americans are frequently heard to equate death with taxes because as far as their expectations as Americans go, you must pay your taxes as surely as die at the appointed time. You even have to pay your taxes within a specified time frame. The consequences of not doing so are supposed to be so unpleasant as not to make the payment of tax very attractive. That holds true for most Americans but not for all Americans. This piece of knowledge we have been able to extract from the life and times of one Donald J. Trump who has managed to withhold his taxes for long periods and in the end paid derisory sums as tax. He has been able to do this with the connivance of his lawyers and accountants who by all accounts are as clever as a cartload of monkeys. That method will not work for the vast majority of Americans which is why it will not be discussed any further.

    I remember clearly my first encounter with the subject of tax. Not as you may have guessed from a lesson in Economics but as a topic in Religious Knowledge. Or, to quote the correct title, Christian Religious knowledge. As can be expected in a joint Anglican and Methodist owned secondary school which I attended, everyone who passed through the school in my time had to face the WAEC examiners in that subject and so, I did.

    In our study of the New Testament, we were informed that in the year when Quirinius was governor of Judea, the word went out from Caesar Augustus that each person be counted, each one in his own village. This is why a humble carpenter named Joseph loaded his pregnant  fiancée on a donkey which bore this heavy burden all the way from Nazareth where he lived and practiced his trade to Bethlehem on account of having descended from the house and lineage of David. How that story ended is known to everyone and is therefore not worth telling here. It is at this point that we have to veer off into the jungle of taxation.

    The census of Quirinius has been placed around the year 6BC, which means that it took place some two thousand and thirty years ago at a time when the nascent Roman empire was undergoing rapid expansion under Caesar Augustus. This demanded a great deal of money which was squeezed out of the conquered peoples who had just been brought under the umbrella of Pax Romana, which guarantee was provided by the sharp spears and sturdy shields of superbly trained Roman soldiers.

    Taxes are paid by living people and the rulers of the Roman empire were determined to collect the taxes from everyone living within their far flung empire hence the decree that everyone reported in their ancestral homes. There to be counted, meticulously no doubt, and be added to the tax roll. These taxes collected was the money used in providing equipment for the army and the building of those excellent roads along which the army moved swiftly whenever and wherever their intervention was required. It has to be pointed out that the army at that point was not only needed for the upkeep of empire, it was also to be made available for the expansion of empire so that even more taxes could be collected from newly conquered territories. Apart from the expenditure on the army, there were other items of other public works including, for example, the provision of potable water which were of course taken care of by the taxes which were extorted from the subjects of the Emperor on his throne in far away Rome.

    The people of Judea, like most red blooded people everywhere loathed the payment of taxes. This is not just because it deprived them of their hard earned money but in their special case, because it also forced them to work to acquire Roman coins on which the head of the emperor was stamped. This went violently against the tenets of Judaism which forbade the handling of graven images. The combination of these and other circumstances within the principality precipitated extremely brutal revolts which were no less ferociously confronted by the Romans who were not averse to the large scale crucifixion of all those who were found guilty of tax evasion in the course of these revolts. The need for Joseph to be captured in that famous census was all about the payment of tax and it was as compulsive as death itself. I must confess that the connection between the circumstances surrounding the birth of Jesus was not emphasised in the lessons that we were exposed to in those days. I made that connection in later years by which time, I had become exposed to books other than the Bible for further instruction.

    Later, much later, many thousand miles from Judea across the Atlantic, there was another iconic response to the issue of taxation. Then, the altercation was between the settlers in the original thirteen colonies which made up the nascent United States of America and the English king, George III who by the way, was German. This time, nobody was being counted and the conflict was upon a point of principle. The thirteen colonies which acquired statehood existed under the shadows of Great Britain to which as it befitted a budding empire, taxes had to be paid and they were duly collected. The colonies were directly controlled by governors who were responsible to the king and this being the case, those from whom taxes were being collected were excluded from the process by which tax assessments were carried out. In time this became a sore point with the people who had to pay those obnoxious taxes. They voiced their dissatisfaction with this arrangement but rather than try to find ways of reducing tax burdens, they were increased. The situation quickly spiralled out of control and the colonised people decided that since they were not represented in the councils of power, then they should not be taxed. They took up the cry, no tax without representation and went into rebellion which after years of bitter fighting led to the birth of the USA. This, the foundation of the Republic was built on the issue of tax and since they had no king or a hereditary aristocracy, nobody could be exempted from paying taxes and the principle of joining life taxes to life itself became firmly established. An example will suffice.

    Read Also: Nigerians will appreciate Tinubu for Tax Reforms – Reps deputy spokesman

    One of the most powerful but certainly the most colourful gangster in the USA in the turbulent Prohibition era was Al Capone, a ruthless but bloodily successful killer with the blood of many men on his hands. It is thought but never proved to be responsible for the Valentine day massacre, so called because it took place on February fourteen 1929. On that day seven mobsters were shot to death in a Chicago garage by gunmen, two of who were dressed as policemen. The men in the garage who were members  of a rival gang, the head of which was the prime target were lined up against a wall and cut down in a hail of submachine gun bullets. The operation lasted only a few minutes after which the gunmen coolly emerged from the garage with their hands up followed by the fake policemen with drawn guns. Although the target of this mayhem fortuitously escaped the massacre, this was a brazen show of force which showed the perpetrator’s contempt for all the rules of civilised behaviour, a monster who had put himself above all laws, human and divine. Al Capone was conveniently hundreds of miles away from the scene of the crime but a great deal of objective evidence pointed to his instigation of the crime. Almost a hundred years later, this involvement, as his involvement in many other murders has not been proved and could not be proved. Al Capone lived above the law in every way except one; he could not live and at the same time not pay his taxes.

    Al Capone had led a life of crime virtually all his life. He was steeped in prostitution, robbery, gambling, bootlegging, protection racketeering, drug trafficking, not to talk of countless murders. Still, he could not be touched by the law because nothing could be proved against him. There was no doubt however that he had a stream of income as proved by the lavishness of his lifestyle. His belief was that since all his income was illegitimate, he did not have to pay any tax. The ground was cut from under him however when a judge ruled in a separate case that illegitimate income was also subject to tax. The most casual investigation showed that Al Capone had no tax returns for many years. He was promptly charged with tax evasion and sentenced to a long term imprisonment equivalent to the crucifixion he would have been subjected to under the harsh laws of the Roman empire. He paid the penalty for living and not paying tax and found out the hard way that the only two things you could not escape in life were death and taxes.

    The issue of taxes continue to loom large in the consciousness of Americans which is why it featured prominently in the manifestoes of both Harris and Trump leading up to the lately concluded elections. It might have done but it does not seem to have mattered to the electorate in the end. This is because the net takeaways from the two candidates are that under Harris tax paid by all income groups except those in the highest 1% earning group was to be reduced. For Trump on the other hand, tax was going to be increased on all earning groups except for those in the highest 5% group. In other words, taxes were to go up across board except for the richest people and corporations who could look forward to increased income and higher profits. The poor on the other hand had little to gain but higher taxes. And this in a country where the only things that you cannot dodge are death and taxes. Times have indeed changed from the days of Augustus when some people were ready to put their lives into the real danger of excruciating torture and death by refusing to pay their tax. At least now, people do not have to go on any journey to be registered because it is the business of the government to make sure that you are tracked every step of the way from cradle, wherever that cradle may be, until death when you are released from the burden of paying tax even though there is still the small matter of death duties.

  • Reps committee assures local manufacturers on tax incentives, others

    Reps committee assures local manufacturers on tax incentives, others

    The Federal House of Representatives Committee on Industry led by Honourable (Dr.) Enitan Dolapo-Badru has hinted of plans to help local manufacturers to enjoy tax concessions and other incentives as part of efforts to boost the sector.

    The lawmaker gave this assurance when he led other committee members on a tour of the facility to the headquarters of the Origin Tech Group and its subsidiary, Origin Automobile Works (OAW), recently.

    The visit was aimed at assessing challenges in the nation’s automotive and the agricultural mechanisation sectors as well as exploring solutions to boost indigenous manufacturing.

    The discussions during the special visit highlighted Origin Tech Group’s contributions to Nigeria’s agricultural and industrial growth, including local tractor manufacturing, partnerships with Lagos and Niger states, and innovative technology solutions like the Tractor on the Go! app.

    An elated Dolapo-Badru who praised Origin Tech Group as the only fully indigenous company with a tractor and harvester assembly plant, stressed that the company has made significant strides for Nigeria’s agricultural and industrial future.

    He reiterated agriculture’s vital role in national development and commended the company’s efforts to empower farmers.

    Read Also: CBN reforms support strong, resilient African financial architecture – Cardoso

    While responding, Origin Tech’s Executive Director of Corporate Services, Olusesan Ayeni, outlined challenges facing local manufacturers, including funding, R&D, training, and tax incentives.

    The Committee pledged to relay these concerns to the National Assembly for legislative action, emphasising its commitment to fostering a self-reliant economy.

    The delegation, including members of the National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC), also toured the Origin Automobile Works assembly plant, witnessing firsthand the company’s capabilities in automotive innovation.

    For over 25 years, Origin Tech Group has been a leader across verticals which includes engineering design and construction, automotive and transportation, and agri-tech, transforming West Africa’s agricultural and livestock value chains.

    Through OAW, the Group drives sustainable development by producing locally made, cutting-edge mechanisation solutions that enhance food security and industrial growth.

  • National Assembly’ll pass Tax Reform Bills, says Hon Jibrin

    National Assembly’ll pass Tax Reform Bills, says Hon Jibrin

    Chairman of House of Representatives Committee on Housing and Habitat Abdulmumin Jibrin from Kano State yesterday declared that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Tax Reform Bills will be passed by both chambers of the National Assembly.

    Jibrin’s assertion came barely 24 hours after the Northern Elders Forum (NEF) called on federal lawmakers from the region to kick against the bills.

    Jibrin gave the assurance while featuring as guest on national television monitored in Lagos.

    He said that President Tinubu, through the tax reform bills and other economic policies, is giving his today for Nigerians’ tomorrow.

    He said: “I have never had any doubt about the consideration and passage of the Tax Reform Bills. We will pass the tax reform bills.”

    Read Also: Oyo govt to entrepreneurs: evade tax, go to jail or risk asset seizure

    Jibrin added that though wrong perception about the reform bills is very strong in the North where he comes from but sensitization on the merits and necessity for the reforms is being done to correct the wrong notions.

    He said: “For those of us who have read through the bills very thoroughly, the aggregate of their advantages, far surpassed whatever perceived disadvantages by anybody or part of the country.

    “President Tinubu is not out for a battle on the bills just like the Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), but for understanding their objectives and goals, which are all geared towards better revenue generation and distribution for economic survival of the country.

    “Yes, there may be contentious clauses in the bills, but that should not mean that they should be thrown away or not considered by the National Assembly.

    “Since the bills are already with us, the onus lies with both chambers to allow them pass through the required legislative processes which would pave the way for amendment of contentious clauses, since they are not cast in stone in the first place.

    “As I said a couple of days ago in a similar programme like this, many of those kicking against the bills, have not read them but are just listening to wrong narratives being reeled out by some other people.”

    The lawmaker added that the fuel subsidy removal and floating of the naira carried out by President Tinubu last year and the proposed tax reform, will transform the nation’s economy despite the hardships and pains being experienced by Nigerians.

    “President Tinubu, to me, is giving his today for Nigerians’ tomorrow through the courageous and long-term result-oriented reforms being carried out now,” he said.

  • FG introduces new tax regulations to ease burden on businesses

    FG introduces new tax regulations to ease burden on businesses

    The Federal Government has introduced new regulations aimed at reducing the tax burden on the manufacturing sector and small businesses.

    The “Deduction of Tax at Source (Withholding) Regulations, 2024,” signed by Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, streamline the deduction of taxes at source from payments to taxable persons, reduce complexities and promote ease of compliance.

    The regulations cover payments made under the Capital Gains Tax Act, Companies Income Tax Act, Petroleum Profits Tax Act and the Personal Income Tax Act.

    They aim to promote global best practices, reduce tax evasion and curb arbitrage between corporate and non-corporate structures.

    The regulations outline rules for deductions, targeting areas where tax collection has previously been difficult or unclear.

    The Ministry aims to foster an environment where small businesses and manufacturers can benefit from tax exemptions, especially in sectors with low profit margins.

    Furthermore, the regulations address exemptions for small businesses and promotes ease of compliance for manufacturers, with clear guidelines on which transactions and sectors are eligible for deductions. Notably, businesses without a Tax Identification Number (TIN) will face a doubled deduction rate for eligible transactions.

    The regulations specify that various entities, including government ministries, statutory bodies, and public authorities, are mandated to deduct taxes at source for eligible transactions. However, small companies with a turnover of N2 million or less in a calendar month and possessing a valid TIN are exempt from this requirement.

    A key point in the regulations is that tax deducted at source will not be regarded as an additional cost or separate tax but will be treated as an advance payment towards the final tax liability of the supplier.

    Read Also: Nigeria needs $410b for energy transition, says ECN

    This approach is designed to ease the burden on businesses and ensure compliance without adding unnecessary financial strain.

    Failure to remit deducted taxes or to deduct tax at source will incur significant penalties.

    The penalty structure aligns with existing legislation under the Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act and the Personal Income Tax Act.

    Exemptions are also defined under the regulations, covering transactions such as compensating payments under registered securities lending transactions, goods manufactured by the supplier, and telephone charges.

    The regulations are set to come into effect on January 1, 2025, but provisions allow for early application from July 1, 2024, in some cases. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) will issue further guidelines to ensure smooth implementation, subject to the approval of the Finance Ministry.

    The Deduction of Tax at Source (Withholding) Regulations, 2024 reflect the government’s ongoing efforts to modernise tax system, reduce inefficiencies and encourage compliance across various sectors.

  • Windfall tax

    Windfall tax

    • Nigerians, and not banks’ shareholders, should reap the profit

    Penultimate week, the Senate gave expeditious passage to President Bola Tinubu’s request to amend the Finance Act to impose a one-time windfall levy on banks’ foreign exchange profits in 2023. Convinced that the president’s proposal of 50 per cent was not deep enough, the senate had, while giving approval, raised it to 70 percent.

    This has, quite naturally, generated disquiet, particularly, in the financial services industry. While the government was eager and robust in the arguments that it needed the fund for capital infrastructure development: education, and healthcare access as well as public welfare initiatives, those opposed to it have adduced arguments ranging from potential double taxation, its somewhat retroactive nature which it is said violates the tenets of taxation, with fears also expressed that the levy could derail the on-going recapitalisation mandated by the apex bank. Others still, have taken the rather extreme position that the levy will send wrong signals to the usual quarters – investors.

    Unfortunately, logical as some of the arguments, particularly the latter appear to sound, we are far from persuaded of their merit. In fact, we consider them as utterly specious if not entirely spurious. To be sure, a windfall tax is precisely what it is – a levy by the government on sectors or businesses that have disproportionately benefited from favourable market conditions.

    This is where those pushing against the levy miss the premise, which is the responsibility of the government to maintain a modicum of social justice and equity at a time of national distress.

    The point is that these are not the usual profits derived from banks’ normal right-through-the-mill operations. Rather, these were enabled by government’s policy of the floating of the naira as a result of which they literally made a ‘kill’.

    The other part is that the Central Bank of Nigeria had long recognised and had thus served advance notice that the funds were not freebies to be deployed as the banks pleased. Noteworthy here is the CBN circular of September 2023 barring commercial banks from utilising the gains for dividends and operational expenditures. This was restated in March, with a reminder to the banks to exercise “utmost prudence and set aside (foreign currency incomes) FCY revaluation gains as a counter-cyclical buffer to cushion any adverse movements in the FX rate”. The directive was unequivocal: “… banks shall not utilise such FX revaluation gains to pay dividends or meet operating expenses.”

    Read Also: Tinubu addressing demands, no need for protest – FEC

    Flowing from the above is the third part which is whether the banks should have, in the circumstance, been allowed to privatise the windfall, given that the reverse could also have spelt doom for their sector. The position, clearly disingenuous, holds no water. After all, there have been countless instances in the past when banks, facing dire stress situations, had to be bailed out by the government, even when no similar records exist of the banks opting to sacrifice their profits for the public good. In other words, whereas governments in the past have had to step in to ‘socialise’ the profligacy of banks’ executives and the losses that attenuate them, we have not read of similar mechanisms to ‘socialise’ if only a portion of their bumper profits out of generosity.

    More importantly is that other economic players in the manufacturing and the real sectors actually posted unprecedented losses from the same measures. In the circumstance, it only stands to reason that government could not be expected to allow one sector to cash out not so much because they put in the hard work, but because fortune smiled on them. And certainly not when the government already had its hands full clearing the mess it inherited, as indeed the fallouts of its own corrective policies.

    Most certainly, there is nothing in the new Finance Act just passed that the banks can point to as not to have been forewarned about. What the act has merely done is align the intention of the monetary side with the explicit wishes of the fiscal side as spelt out in the act; the only notable exception being the proportion of the sacrifice to be borne by the banks.

    How much are we talking about by the way?

    Estimates have put the windfall at approximately N1.3 trillion. That the government in its wisdom, considers the Nigerian people as by far more deserving of the windfall since they ultimately bore the pains, as against the shareholders of the banks, is hard to fault. It is not something the banks or anyone for that matter should squabble over; certainly not at this time.

  • ANAN, CITN back government on 70% windfall tax on foreign exchange

    ANAN, CITN back government on 70% windfall tax on foreign exchange

    The Association of National Accountants of Nigeria (ANAN) and the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN) have pledged their support for the government’s recent initiative to impose a 70% windfall tax on foreign exchange (FX) gains accrued by banks.

    During the association’s 4th Joint Council Retreat in Abuja, ANAN president, Samuel Agbeluyi, stated that the new tax policy will help address the widening fiscal deficit and bolster national revenue amid ongoing economic challenges.

    The National Assembly had last week announced that President Bola Tinubu requested an amendment to the 2023 Finance Act to impose a one-time windfall tax of 50 percent on banks’ FX gains from last year.

    The president had previously explained that the windfall tax would be used to finance infrastructural projects, education, healthcare, and other critical areas.

    Read Also: Makinde lauds Tinubu for approving Ibadan Airport upgrade, takeover of Liberty stadium

    He said: “Windfall tax is not new. It is what is called a prosperity tax. It was done when during Covid, many were at home and many activities went down and the people in the telecom did very well. So, if you did very well because of this calamity that has befallen the whole world or befallen this country, can you spare a little bit of your prosperity?

    “The reason for taxation is for distribution of income and as a result of that distribution, the banks have done very well. We congratulate them for doing well. But, if we isolate you, and you are the only one doing well and the other business sectors are not doing well and they are declaring losses and the government allows that to continue, what will happen in another two to three years when all the companies fold up? So, let us share in your prosperity.”

    Adeluyi urged citizens not to view the fine as punitive, stating, “It will ultimately benefit everyone. Once these companies thrive, they will be able to open more businesses, positively impacting the banks and contributing to Nigeria’s greatness. The economy is a system, and you cannot isolate one part from the other; a holistic view is essential.”

    Dr. James Ekerare Neminebor, President and Chairman of the Council of ANAN, expressed dissatisfaction with Nigeria’s current tax structure and its impact on citizens.

    Supporting the CITN President’s stance on the windfall tax, Neminebor said, “As my president mentioned, it’s about wealth distribution. If you have significant wealth, paying this tax is acceptable, but it shouldn’t be overly burdensome for the taxpayers.”

  • Finance Act: Windfall tax explainer

    Finance Act: Windfall tax explainer

    • Arabinrin Aderonke

    Why is the Nigerian government introducing a windfall tax, and what does it mean for the economy?  As part of economic reforms, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration has proposed a one-time windfall levy aimed at addressing the substantial gains made by Nigerian banks due to changes in exchange rates.

    The Windfall Tax, recently introduced under Nigeria’s Finance Act, promises many benefits for the nation. By redistributing these unexpected gains, the tax will channel funds into important public services, including infrastructure development, healthcare, and education.

    This redistribution is expected to improve public amenities, support the quality of education and healthcare, and address economic disparities. Moreover, the funds are likely to stimulate job creation and promote economic growth.

    The Federal Government proposal to amend the Finance Act through the windfall tax on the foreign exchange extraordinary gains realised by banks. This measure shows a commitment to ensuring that the financial benefits derived from recent economic reforms are shared with the public. This proposal is framed in such a way as to drive national development while avoiding additional tax burdens on ordinary citizens.

    The concept of windfall taxes is not unique to Nigeria. Globally, windfall taxes have been implemented in many ways with different outcomes. The Czech Republic has levied a 60% tax on energy firms and banks, raising $3.4 billion to help those affected by energy price hikes. Hungary has used its tax to promote government bond purchases and introduced a new social tax. Lithuania allocates its windfall revenue to military funding, while Sweden uses it to strengthen public finances. In the United Kingdom, Parliament is considering a windfall tax on banks to address economic inequality and support public services. All these international contexts indicate that windfall taxes are a standard method for managing and redistributing unexpected profits.

    Read Also: Lagos IGR to rise as strategic agenda on taxation takes off

    In discussions at the National Assembly recently, both Mr. Wale Edun, the Minister of Finance, and Dr. Zacch Adedeji, Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), provided information on the rationale behind this tax. Mr. Edun highlighted that imposing such levies is a common practice worldwide and is designed to ensure that the benefits resulting from government policies are shared with the public.

    Dr. Adedeji, in his own comments, emphasized that the windfall tax would help mitigate economic inequalities, particularly in light of

     recent harmonisation policies in the foreign exchange market. The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has worked hand-in-hand with the Central Bank of Nigeria to ensure the levy supports rather than disrupts the banking sector.

    Moving forward, banks must work closely with the federal government on the windfall tax. This partnership ensures the efficient allocation of funds to enhance public services, promote economic stability, and maximise benefits for all Nigerians. Together, they pave the way for a prosperous nation.

    • Arabinrin Aderonke is an Award-Winning investigative journalist, 2016 finalist, CNN African Journalism Award. She currently serves as the Technical Assistant, Broadcast Media at the Federal Inland Revenue Service
  • FULL LIST: Four items for import without tax

    FULL LIST: Four items for import without tax

    The Federal Government on Monday announced the suspension of duties, tariffs, and taxes on some essential food items imported through land and sea borders.

    The Minister of Agriculture and Food Security, Abubakar Kyari, made this known during a press briefing at the National Press Centre, Abuja.

    Kyari disclosed that the listed food items will enjoy a 150-day Duty-Free Import Window.

    Here is a list of food commodities:

    1. Maize

    2. Wheat

    3. Husked brown rice

    4. Cowpeas

  • Tinubu approves new withholding tax policy

    Tinubu approves new withholding tax policy

    President Bola Tinubu has approved a new withholding tax policy, replacing the old policy established in 1977. 

    Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele announced this on Tuesday.

    The new withholding tax policy introduces significant reforms designed to alleviate the heavy burden that the previous system imposed on farmers and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). 

    According to Oyedele, the updated regime addresses several long-standing challenges and introduces specific provisions, including: Small businesses will now be exempt from withholding tax compliance, reducing their administrative and financial burdens; businesses with low profit margins will benefit from reduced withholding tax rates, easing their cash flow and operational costs and producers, particularly farmers, will receive exemptions, fostering growth and sustainability in these critical sectors.

    Read Also: Oyedele proposes tax exemption for vulnerable, poor people

    Others are the new measures aim to enhance compliance and reduce opportunities for tax evasion and avoidance. The policy streamlines the process of obtaining credit and utilizing tax deducted at source, making it more accessible for businesses. Updates to the new withholding tax regime will reflect emerging issues and align with global best practices, ensuring Nigeria’s tax system is contemporary and effective, and the new policy will provide clear guidelines on the timing of deductions and definitions of key terms, eliminating ambiguities.

    Oyedele identified several issues with the previous withholding tax regime, which evolved to cover more transactions over time, leading to complications and unintended consequences.

    According to him: “Businesses, especially Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), faced ambiguities regarding compliance, eligible transactions, applicable rates, and remittance timing. This complexity resulted in an excessive compliance burden and strained working capital for low-margin businesses”.

    Other identified challenges include previous system treated withholding tax as a separate tax, adding to the list of multiple taxes and increasing the cost of doing business. Obtaining refunds for excess withholding tax was problematic, causing further financial strain on businesses. The lack of an exemption threshold made compliance costs uneconomical for taxpayers and enforcement costs high for tax authorities. Also, the overall structure of the old regime promoted tax inequity, failing to address emerging and contemporary issues effectively.

    The new withholding tax policy is expected to bring significant relief and clarity to Nigerian businesses, promoting a more equitable and efficient tax system. The approved regulations will be published in the official gazette in the coming days, formalizing the changes and providing detailed guidelines for compliance.

    This reform marks a critical step in Nigeria’s ongoing fiscal policy and tax reforms, demonstrating President Tinubu’s commitment to creating a more conducive environment for businesses to thrive.

  • ATAF unveils guide to help African nations boost tax revenue

    ATAF unveils guide to help African nations boost tax revenue

    The African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) has taken steps to strengthen tax collection across the continent with the launch of a new guide on Voluntary Disclosure Programmes (VDPs). 

    This initiative addresses the critical need for African nations to “enhance revenue generation” by providing practical tools to encourage tax compliance.

    The “ATAF Guide on Implementation of Voluntary Disclosure Programme” offers comprehensive guidance for African tax authorities on establishing and implementing VDPs. 

    These programmes provide a framework for “non-compliant taxpayers to regularize their tax affairs voluntarily.” 

    By encouraging disclosure of previously undeclared income and assets, VDPs can lead to “significant disclosures of foreign assets” and “substantial increases in tax revenues.”

    Read Also: Fed govt sets N19.4tr Tax Revenue Target for FIRS in 2024

    The guide draws on successful VDP implementations in ATAF member countries like South Africa, Nigeria, and Kenya.  These case studies highlight the tangible benefits of VDPs, like increased identification of undisclosed foreign assets; significant growth in tax revenue collection and expansion of the formal tax base through improved compliance

    The ATAF guide offers “the necessary tools to navigate the complexities of revenue collection” by providing insights into the benefits and costs of VDPs; key policy design choices and practical considerations for implementation

    The guide includes a “Suggested Approach to Drafting VDP legislation” that African countries can adapt to their specific circumstances.  It is designed to be a “simple and practical tool” with explanatory notes to assist lawmakers and tax administrations.  The guide addresses key considerations for the African context, such as eligibility criteria for participation in VDPs; programme duration, and confidentiality protocols

    Mr. Logan Wort, Executive Secretary of ATAF, emphasized the importance of the new guide, stating, “We believe that this guide will serve as a valuable resource for African tax administrations, empowering them to implement effective VDPs tailored to their unique contexts.”

    The launch of the VDP guide aligns with ATAF’s broader strategy to address the issue of tax evasion, a major contributor to “illicit financial flows” from Africa. 

    By equipping tax authorities with practical tools and fostering knowledge sharing, ATAF aims to “support African tax administrations in navigating the evolving landscape of revenue mobilization.”  Ultimately, this initiative seeks to “foster sustainable revenue generation across the African continent.”