Tag: thief

  • I’m not a thief, says Diezani, faults EFCC

    I’m not a thief, says Diezani, faults EFCC

    •Anti graft agency ‘taking advantage of my silence to try me by media’
    •Denies withdrawal of $153m from NNPC accounts
    •Yenagoa estate is family compound built in 2011

     

    Embattled former Petroleum Minister, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, is not taking allegations of massive corruption leveled against her by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) lightly.
    She rose in her own stout defence yesterday, denying the allegations.
    She accused the EFCC of taking advantage of her silence all this while to put her on media trial and declared in a lengthy statement from her London home.
    She said given the “level of deliberate inaccuracies”, she had now been forced to break her silence and respond to some issues.
    She specifically denied ever withdrawing $153million from the accounts of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) while in office and said the Yenagoa estate, which the EFCC ascribed to her is her family’s compound built in 2011.
    The EFCC, according to her, is only out to convict her in the court if public opinion based on “false reports.”
    She said: “I have up till now chosen to maintain my silence and not to respond to inaccurate press reporting.
    “However, given the level of deliberate inaccuracies, I am now forced to respond because it is clear that the EFCC is taking advantage of my silence to try me by media and to convict me in the eyes of the public on false reports.
    “I am deeply disturbed and bewildered by recent media reports (Premium Times Thursday 12 January, 2017 and other dailies about the same time) claiming that by virtue of an order of the Federal High Court, I have forfeited to the Federal Government, the sum of $153.3m which I purportedly stole from the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC.
    “First and foremost, whilst the reasons for my being out of the country are public knowledge, the principle of fair hearing demands that I should have been notified of formal charges if truly there was a prima facie evidence or indictment against my person linking me with the said issue, so as to ensure that I had adequate legal representation. This was never done.
    “I wish to state that I cannot forfeit what was never mine. I do not know the basis on which the EFCC have chosen to say that I am the owner of these funds as no evidence was provided to me before the order was obtained and they have not in fact served me with the order or, any evidence since they obtained it.”
    She went on: “As at the time of my writing this rebuttal (Thursday 19th January, 2017) the EFCC have still not furnished me or my Lawyers, with a copy of the order.
    “I am also informed by my lawyers that the legislation under which the EFCC obtained this order is for situations where the funds are believed to be the proceeds of crime and the owner is not known.
    “I do not therefore understand how the EFCC can in the same breath say that the monies in question are mine.
    “If they had evidence that the monies were mine then they would not /should not have used the procedure which applies only to funds of unknown ownership.
    “If indeed they used this particular legal procedure because they did not know who owned the monies, then how can they now be falsely attributing the ownership to me.
    “Let me re-state categorically as I have always maintained for the record, I have not and will never steal money from or defraud the Federal Government of Nigeria.
    “I am willing to respond to any charges brought against me that follow duly laid down procedures.
    “However, in their typical manner and style, the EFCC have gone to the media to attempt to prosecute their case as trial by TV and other media, rather than go through the onerous but tried and tested means of the Judicial Court process.
    “In the face of the obvious falsification of facts and misinformation, it is only right and proper that the EFCC should publish the details of the $153.3M lodgements, the bank account numbers and the account beneficiaries, showing proof of my link to them.
    “Having also alleged that the said $153.3M was ‘wired’ from NNPC, the EFCC should also publish details of the NNPC accounts from where the said $153.3 million was taken from with proof that I authorized such a transaction/transactions acting either in my private capacity or, as The Honourable Minister of Petroleum.
    “Let me state for the record that as Minister of Petroleum, the operation and management of NNPC finances were outside my purview as outlined in both the Petroleum Act and the NNPC Act.
    “The only involvement I had in NNPC Finances was in terms of statutory matters where the Petroleum Act prescribed that as Minister, there were certain duties or actions which I had to perform or take in relation to NNPC.
    On alleged $700million found in her house and some mansions traced to her, Diezani accused EFCC of witch-hunt.
    She added: “On the 13th of June 2016, the EFCC once again took their well-trodden path to the media. This time claiming that they had ‘discovered’ a mansion in Asokoro, Abuja, worth $18million (approx. N9billion) which they purported to belong to me.
    “The EFCC went to the extent of bringing in Aljazeera, an International TV Station, to air a damaging documentary against me in this regard, showing a particular residential building in Asokoro, Abuja, which they told Aljazeera belonged to me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIQdZfz_JdA.
    “The EFCC Chairman Ibrahim Magu, personally took the Aljazeera reporter to the building, alleging that it belonged to me.
    “It has since become apparent that the house belongs to a company owned by Mr Kola Aluko.
    “If this is not a witch-hunt or a personal vendetta against me, how is it that one of our Country’s premier investigative agencies were unable to avail themselves of facts that are freely available in the public domain?
    “Since the EFCC claims that the alleged $18million Asokoro property belongs to me, then they should kindly produce the ‘Authentic’ Certificate of Occupancy and Land Registry information and any other relevant information, as proof of my ownership of the property.
    “On the 9th November 2016, the EFCC visited our family home in Yenagoa (Bayelsa State) as pre-agreed and they were escorted around the premises.
    “I was therefore completely shocked to once again see my name sensationally splashed across the Front Pages of Newspapers and widely circulated on the internet, with blaring Headlines such as “EFCC UNCOVERS DIEZANI’S MULTI-BILLION NAIRA ESTATE” – Nation Newspaper, January 8, 2017 (Annex- 4A). There was absolutely nothing ‘Hidden’ or ‘Concealed’ about the home.
    “I had declared it openly as required by Law, in my Asset declaration forms (Annex-4B). Yet the EFCC have announced that they ‘Just Discovered’ my ‘Hidden Estate’! And labelled it a ‘Multi-Billion Naira Estate’! Even though they had been given the Bill of Quantities, showing actual amount spent.
    “It is accepted tradition across the length and breadth of Nigeria, for people to own Country/Village homes. Given the size of the land and the location of the compound, the buildings thereon cannot by any stretch of the imagination be a “Multi-Billion Naira” palatial estate, as the news mongers would want to portray.
    “The EFCC were taken on a tour of the compound which consisted of a Main house, and two outhouses – An Obi (meeting bungalow) and a staff quarters(BQ) building – above which we built 3 guest rooms and a parlour.
    “The only other two structures are the gate and generator houses. Construction began in late 2011 and was handled in phases.
    “During the visit the EFCC was given the bill of quantities, which up until the time construction stopped in early 2015, due to my illness, was at approximately N394million which was declared in the code of conduct documentation, attached (the costs were partially funded by a loan – see code of conduct – Annex4B, the work is still uncompleted and the contractor is still being owed).
    “Building costs escalated as a result of delays in construction and external factors such as the extreme flooding of late 2012 that covered most of our areas in the Niger Delta.
    “It is the accepted norm when building in the Niger Delta, that due to the topography of the land and the heavily waterlogged and marshy terrain, construction is infinitely more expensive than in other parts of the country, as by its nature it requires the building of extensive piling/raft foundations before any structural work can commence.
    “The flooding of 2012 compounded the problem and further increased the cost of construction.
    “Stories were circulated by unscrupulous agents of calumny that the EFCC found a mind boggling $700million in cash in my home in Abuja.
    “Would the videos of this $700 million cash discovery not have made good viewing? Or should those who recovered this money not tell the public where exactly the money has been kept?
    “Perhaps the Central Bank should corroborate that it is in custody of these monies allegedly found in my house
    “But then, it is now patently apparent that Nigerians are no longer easily led to believe fables and sensational untruths.”
    The ex-Minister said despite the criticism of her tenure, she left $5.6billion LNG dividends for the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari.
    She said: “I would like to state for the record that I performed my duty as Minister of Petroleum Resources with the utmost sincerity and sense of responsibility, ensuring that all Nigerians irrespective of creed, gender or tribe enjoyed their rightful benefits from the Oil and Gas Sector.
    “It is pertinent to note that at the end of my tenure, I left behind in the LNG dividend fund, for the incoming Administration, the sum of $5.6billion (five billion six hundred million US Dollars)(Annex-6A).
    “I did this to ensure continuity in the crucial gas sector development which underpins the entire Power and Energy Sector and which was and still is, absolutely imperative for the Country’s current and future economic development.”
    Regarding Malabu oil block (OPL 245) , the ex-Minister said her was a “purely statutory one as required by Law in the Petroleum Act.”
    She said she did not benefit in any way from the transactions or negotiations on the oil block.
    She said: “With regards to the various news reports published in both the online and print media, insidiously inferring that I was indicted by Italian prosecutors for, as they put it, ‘ sharing in the Loot’ of the $1.3bn OPL 245 oil block deal that involved Malabu and the Joint Venture Multinational partners, ENI(AGIP) and Royal Dutch Shell.
    “Let me once again state for the record that this is another figment of the author’s imagination, which given the persistent bid to ensure my destruction and stick all of the sins of the Corruption plagued Oil and Gas Sector of over the last 30years upon my head, probably emanated from the EFCC itself!
    “Let me clarify the position are the history of OPL 245, otherwise known as Malabu. You will find a full chronology in the attached report that I made to the House of Representatives in late 2011 (Annex 2A/Annex-2B).
    “In 2010, shortly after I was appointed as Minister of Petroleum Resources, the issue of OPL 245 was brought to my attention.
    “I looked into the case and immediately became aware of the inherent and long standing sensitivities around this issue.
    “It became clear from the onset that this case was not within the direct purview of the Minister of Petroleum Resources but in the main was centered around issues of Law.
    “By this time there was already an ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) investigation and claims against the FGN running into billions of dollars.
    “Therefore, we took directives from the Chief Legal Officer of the nation; the Attorney General and Minister of Justice. In all of these matters due process was followed to the letter at all times.
    “I wish to categorically state that I have never held any discussions on this matter with any individuals or entities outside of official channels.
    “As Minister of Petroleum Resources, I did not participate in any activity relating to financial payments on the Malabu matter, other than those statutorily mandated to the Minister of Petroleum Resources by the Petroleum Act.
    “My role in this matter was a purely statutory one as required by Law in the Petroleum Act.”
    In an emotional tone, Diezani expressed confidence that she will be vindicated at the end of the ongoing investigations at home and in the UK.
    She added: “It is saddening that after eight years of serving my country, my experience as a public servant has been fraught with continuous malicious castigation and character assassination, all in the name of ‘personal vendettas’ or political horse trading.
    “It has become apparent to many that these untruths told were at best well-crafted fables.
    “The most dramatic and damning accusation was the infamous missing $49.8 Billion Dollars, that went from to $12billion and then up to $20 billion and which was alleged missing from NNPC.
    “Today, we all know that the PWC report that was published cleared me of any wrong doing and no one up till now has been able to controvert the PWC report nor has anyone found the “missing” 20 billion, or who took it.
    “In addition, the Makarfi-led committee in the Senate of The Federal Republic of Nigeria, in a series of publicly-held hearings, also vindicated me on the matter of the purportedly missing funds.

    She said: “I would like to state for the record that I performed my duty as Minister of Petroleum Resources with the utmost sincerity and sense of responsibility, ensuring that all Nigerians irrespective of creed, gender or tribe enjoyed their rightful benefits from the Oil and Gas Sector.
    “It is pertinent to note that at the end of my tenure, I left behind in the LNG dividend fund, for the incoming Administration, the sum of $5.6billion (five billion six hundred million US Dollars)(Annex-6A).
    “I did this to ensure continuity in the crucial gas sector development which underpins the entire Power and Energy Sector and which was and still is, absolutely imperative for the Country’s current and future economic development.”
    Regarding Malabu oil block (OPL 245) , the ex-Minister said her was a “purely statutory one as required by Law in the Petroleum Act.”
    She said she did not benefit in any way from the transactions or negotiations on the oil block.
    She said: “With regards to the various news reports published in both the online and print media, insidiously inferring that I was indicted by Italian prosecutors for, as they put it, ‘ sharing in the Loot’ of the $1.3bn OPL 245 oil block deal that involved Malabu and the Joint Venture Multinational partners, ENI(AGIP) and Royal Dutch Shell.
    “Let me once again state for the record that this is another figment of the author’s imagination, which given the persistent bid to ensure my destruction and stick all of the sins of the Corruption plagued Oil and Gas Sector of over the last 30years upon my head, probably emanated from the EFCC itself!
    “Let me clarify the position are the history of OPL 245, otherwise known as Malabu. You will find a full chronology in the attached report that I made to the House of Representatives in late 2011 (Annex 2A/Annex-2B).
    “In 2010, shortly after I was appointed as Minister of Petroleum Resources, the issue of OPL 245 was brought to my attention.
    “I looked into the case and immediately became aware of the inherent and long standing sensitivities around this issue.
    “It became clear from the onset that this case was not within the direct purview of the Minister of Petroleum Resources but in the main was centered around issues of Law.
    “By this time there was already an ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) investigation and claims against the FGN running into billions of dollars.
    “Therefore, we took directives from the Chief Legal Officer of the nation; the Attorney General and Minister of Justice. In all of these matters due process was followed to the letter at all times.
    “I wish to categorically state that I have never held any discussions on this matter with any individuals or entities outside of official channels.
    “As Minister of Petroleum Resources, I did not participate in any activity relating to financial payments on the Malabu matter, other than those statutorily mandated to the Minister of Petroleum Resources by the Petroleum Act.
    “My role in this matter was a purely statutory one as required by Law in the Petroleum Act.”
    In an emotional tone, Diezani expressed confidence that she will be vindicated at the end of the ongoing investigations at home and in the UK.
    She added: “It is saddening that after eight years of serving my country, my experience as a public servant has been fraught with continuous malicious castigation and character assassination, all in the name of ‘personal vendettas’ or political horse trading.
    “It has become apparent to many that these untruths told were at best well-crafted fables.
    “The most dramatic and damning accusation was the infamous missing $49.8 Billion Dollars, that went from to $12billion and then up to $20 billion and which was alleged missing from NNPC.
    “Today, we all know that the PWC report that was published cleared me of any wrong doing and no one up till now has been able to controvert the PWC report nor has anyone found the “missing” 20 billion, or who took it.
    “In addition, the Makarfi-led committee in the Senate of The Federal Republic of Nigeria, in a series of publicly-held hearings, also vindicated me on the matter of the purportedly missing funds.
    “Yet, we are all silent as if these events never occurred! The allegations that I have addressed above are no different, the character assassination continues, this time with a new set of hirelings.
    “One of the basic tenets of the human trait is that we all have shortcomings and we all make our fair share of mistakes, whether we are in positions of leadership, or not.
    “However, one error that cannot be ascribed to me is stealing from Nigeria and defrauding my country!
    “It is therefore sad and distressing that in spite of all that I tried to do in the best interest of our nation, I continue to be faced with constant demonisation, unproven accusations and deeply personal insults.
    “In response I have chosen not to insult, accuse or demonise anyone, any person or persons. In spite of all the allegations that have been made against me, not one has been factually proven.
    “I remain very proud of the fact that all the policies, tenets and plans that I initiated in the Oil & Gas sector are still underpinning the entire structure.
    “This is because they were put in place with the good of the entire nation and its people in mind. They were not factional, or tribal, neither were they based on religious bias.
    “I can therefore, no longer sit back and allow the fabricated accusations against my person designed by unscrupulous persons with a vengeful agenda go unchallenged.
    “As a Christian, it is my sincerely held belief that in the coming months, history will be the judge of exactly who lied and who told the truth. By the Grace of God, I shall be here to see the day when truth prevails.
    “The fight against corruption in Nigeria will be far better served if the EFCC focuses on incontrovertible facts, as opposed to media sensationalism and completely distorted stories, in their bid to demonize and destroy a few specially chosen Nigerians.”

  • Man to court: My wife is a thief

    Man to court: My wife is a thief

    A 42-year-old businessman, Livinus Uwa, has told an Igando Customary Court in Lagos that he married a thief.

    Uwa made this known when he testified in his divorce petition against his wife, Chineye, on Wednesday in Lagos.

    He urged the court to dissolve his four-year-old marriage to Chineye because of her penchant for stealing his money in the wardrobe.

    “I married a thief, on severally occasions, my wife stole my money from my wardrobe, rendering me broke. The last time she burgled my room and stole N350, 000.

    “I reported the theft at the police station and she confessed to the theft, but the money was not recovered,

    “I have reported all her attitudes and stealing habits to both families, they called her but she refused to change,’’ he said.

    The petitioner accused his wife, who failed to appear in court after several summonses of abandonment, adding that since they married, Chineye had been appearing and disappearing.

    “When she was pregnant, she left the house to an unknown place and came back after she was delivered of the baby.

    “She abandoned our baby when she was 10-month-old; I have to engage a baby sitter to take care of her. When the baby was two years, I enrolled her in school and my wife reappeared,’’ he said.

    He described his estranged wife as a lazy and dirty woman, adding that “Chineye is lazy, she cannot cook, wash or sweep and I do the house chores.

    Uwa pleaded with the court to dissolve the marriage, since he could no longer condone her stealing habits, adding that he was no longer in love with her.

    In his judgment, President of the court, Mr Adegboyega Omilola, dissolved the marriage.

    Omilola held that it was obvious from available testimony and the respondent’s refusal to appear in court that the marriage had hit the rock.

    He said throughout the duration of this case, the respondent refused to honour court summon, adding that the court had no other choice than to dissolve the marriage.

    “The marriage between Livinus Uwa and Chineye Uwa is hereby dissolved from today, both parties are no longer husband and wife, they are free to go their separate ways without any hindrances and molestation,’’ Omilola said.

  • RRS nabs suspected streetlight cable thief

    RRS nabs suspected streetlight cable thief

    Rapid Response Squad (RRS) operatives have arrested a vandal for allegedly digging up the armoured cable for the Ojota Street light and removing its silver protector.

    Obaji Christopher, 23, from Benue State, was caught last Saturday by RRS men on routine surveillance of Ojota loop, inward Ketu-Alapere Road around 11:20am while allegedly pulling out the cable.

    Obaji, who claimed to have arrived in Lagos two weeks ago, was said to have dug up the cable with hoe. He was said to be with an accomplice, who fled.

    In a statement yesterday, RRS said: “Early on Saturday morning, during our daily patrol routine, we saw the suspect where he was vandalising the armoured cable meant to electrify Lagos in Ojota.

    “The cable was buried after it was laid. We saw him and his accomplice digging up the cable. He was using hoe to bring the cable to the surface while his friend had on him a broken saw, cutting some part in the cable,” he said.

    The suspect, the RRS said, claimed that poverty led him into the act.

    It quoted Christopher as saying: “I just arrived in Lagos about two weeks ago. When I had nowhere to sleep, I started sleeping inside Ojota park. It was at this park that I met one guy, simply identified as Anago, who introduced me to this job.

    “Anago told me that if I was able to go for two to three operations, I will have enough money to take care of my present predicament. On this very day, we went together to Ojota for the operation. When we got there, both of us dug the ground where the cable was buried.

    “We had successfully pulled it out. But to my surprise, I didn’t know how my friend escaped from the scene. When I was about to be packing the cable into a sack, I saw policemen appeared. At this point, I didn’t know what to do again. That was how I was arrested”.

    Last April 2, the RRS arrested Lucky Udeagwu for allegedly stealing a 35-meter-long armoured cable meant for the Light up Lagos’ project in Ogudu.

    Police spokesperson Dolapo Badmus, a Superintendent (SP) said the government would not tolerate vandalism and saboteurs.

    The suspect has been transferred to Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS’s) office in Ikeja.

     

  • Who is the thief?

    SIR: I wonder if Cameron sometimes takes the time to read that Holy book since it’s written in his own language. If he does, I wonder what he thinks about the banks under his sphere of control who reap the bloodied loots ferried into their vaults from impoverished nations that are “fantastically corrupt”.

    It’s seasons like this that fills me with the bile that threatened to drown us in my days as an active journalist. We would pound the streets trying to expose the rot in the country. As young me, our one dream was to make our country better. It was a frustrating endeavor because the closer your nose gets to the stench, the wider your eyes open and you realize that the thieves of Nigeria have a safe harbour in Britain and other developed nations. You can write all you care and expose the high and mighty. The British embassy is busy stamping their passports with visas so they can go spend the looted funds in London.

    And, you wonder – who is the thief?

    Any day Cameron takes a stroll from his hallowed 10 Downing street residence, down the pricey streets of London, he knows most of those mansions are owned by men and women who have bled their country dry. Some of them are Nigerians. Anyone who cares knows their names. Some of them are even in the Panama Papers that Cameron is very familiar with.

    You wonder what Cameron does about the thieves strolling his streets? Does he care about the impoverished people in the lands where the funds were stolen or does he care about the property tax flowing into British coffers? Why hasn’t Britain joined other European Union states in imposing sanctions against British overseas territories and crown dependencies that continue to act as tax havens for the wealthy?

    Go to the museums in London and you’ll see artefacts stolen from Nigerian cities. The museums make millions of pounds annually from tourists eager to see these amazing works of our forefathers. What does Nigeria get from these exhibits? Nothing. Would Britain do the honourable thing and return the artefacts to where they rightly belong?

    Or, would it be business as usual with uppity rhetoric tumbling down from the bloodstained mountains?

    Is Nigeria corrupt as a nation? Yes. Are we as a nation trying to correct the ills of our recent past? Even a man lost in the space knows the answer is a resounding yes.

    We have a president in Muhammadu Buhari who has had opportunities to be one of the world’s silent billionaires but resisted the temptation. We have a leader who wakes up every morning thinking of how to get the looted funds overseas back into Nigeria so we can develop our country. We have a man who goes to bed at night wondering if any child went to bed hungry because of the mismanagement of past leaders. We have a patriot traversing the globe in search of a way to move his country into the league of advanced nations.

    Now you know what they mean when they say talk is cheap. It’s cheaper when you hold a glass of wine in one hand and force errors out of your ministerial mouth, all to impress her majesty.

    I serve at the pleasure of a president who is not afraid to ruffle feathers. But, I was exceptionally proud of his stance on Cameron’s error. “I am not going to demand an apology from anyone, what I will demand is the return of our assets,” the president said.

    The ball is firmly in the court of Saint Cameron? What does the Prime Minister do? Does he take up President Buhari’s challenge and help return the stolen wealth back to Nigeria where they belong?

    And, that makes me wonder – who really is the thief? Is it the man or woman who steals from his country and flees overseas with his loot? Or, is it the country who stashes that money in the bank, shelters the looter and provides him safe haven?

    Now, if you can answer that, you would have stumbled on something truly fantastic.

     

     

    • Babafemi Ojudu,

    Abuja.

  • Thief caught after falling in love with victim’s daughter

    A notorious burglar, identified as Samson Ugbusun, has been arrested after he made love overtures to the daughter of one of his victims.

    Samson, a bricklayer, had stolen two mobile phones from his victims after breaking into their homes at Etete in Oredo Local Government Area of Edo State.

    After the successful operation, he called a number belonging to the daughter of one of his victim and invited her to spend the night at his apartment.

    Samson was nabbed after the girl, who had played along, revealed his whereabouts.

    Speaking to newsmen after his arrest, Samson said he took to crime to raise money to carry out the burial ceremony of his late father.

    According to him, “I stole handsets at Etete, through the window around 11pm. I removed the handset through the window of the house by tearing the net. This is my first time.”

    “I saw her (victim’s daughter) number on the phone I stole. I called the girl and told her that I love her. She came and spent the night with me and went back to school.

  • RRS arrests Light up Lagos Project cable ‘thief’

    RRS arrests Light up Lagos Project cable ‘thief’

    Rapid Response Squad (RRS) operatives have arrested a 29-year-old man for allegedly stealing a 35 meter-long armoured cable for the Light Up Lagos Project in Ogudu.

    Udeagwu, from Delta State, with two others, now at large, was seen on Saturday coming out of the bush around Ogudu Bus Stop by RRS operatives on routine surveillance at 3am carrying a big sack containing the armoured cable.

    RRS Monitor, led by Inspector Bello Kabir, on patrol of Oworoshoki Expressway inward Alapere said:  “We saw Lucky and two other guys carrying a big sack coming towards Ogudu Bus Stop. Because it was a straight road, we could see them from afar. They dropped the bag at the Bus Stop as they sighted RRS vehicle and ran in different directions but we caught Lucky. We were suspicious that what could make them run when they saw us must be something criminal. We checked the bag and we saw a 35-meter long armoured cable. Beside the bag was a camouflage cap.

    “On the spot, we searched him. We found in his small bag, a screw driver, 10 spanners and a T-shirt. The 10 spanner is the size of the bolts covering the street lights in this area.”

    RRS quoted Lucky as saying: “I got to Ogudu Bus Stop around 3am on Saturday. It is true those boys watched the express before dropping the sack containing the cable. I wanted to get to Ikorodu early so that I can get site job. I saw those two boys brought that bag from a nearby bus stop and as soon as they saw the police, they ran and I followed them. Those working tools in my bag are what I use to service my generator. I am not one of those boys.”

    Police spokesperson Dolapo Badmos, a Superintendent (SP), said the suspect had been transferred to the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) office in Ikeja.

  • Suspected cable thief electrocuted

    Suspected cable thief electrocuted

    A suspected thief was electrocuted last Sunday in Oke Ureje area of Ado Ekiti, the Ekiti State capital, while allegedly stealing cable from a transformer located in the area.

    The area had been plunged into darkness after some unknown persons vandalised the transformer but the residents felt some sense of justice in the wake of electrocution of the suspect.

    Not a few residents gathered to catch a glimpse of the body of the late cable thief before it was later taken to the mortuary.

    The Chairman of the Ajegunle/Ureje Landlord Association, Alhaji Arijoyo Olowoyo, who spoke with reporters, said residents were shocked to see the lifeless body of the suspect.

    He said:  “It was just about 6.20 am today. We saw a ladder but didn’t see anyone on it. We moved closer to the transformer to see who could be working on the transformer and we were shocked to see the body of a strange man by the transformer. It was then we knew that the deceased must have been the thief who was electrocuted while stealing from the power equipment.”

    Another community leader, Prince Ojo Adewale (aka Ogo Oluwa), revealed that the community had been in blackout since December, 2014.

    He said efforts to get government and the Benin Electricity Distribution Company (BEDC) to come to their aid has been futile.

    Adewale said:  “Since December 24, 2014, we haven’t had power in this community because the thieves have vandalised the transformer, carting away vital parts of it. They even pulled down the up-riser connected to it.

    “We have gone to the BEDC and asked them  to repair the transformer but they said we should off-set our huge debts first but these were individual debts of people owing power bills.

    “Now that this has happened, we want the government to assist us and prevent further damage to the power cables of our transformer. We promise to protect the transformer if the government helps us. ”

    BEDC Public Relations Officer, Mr. Kayode Ilori,  explained that the deceased must have started his evil business very early in the morning when there was no power on the up-riser.

    “But unfortunately for him and fortunately for us, power suddenly got to the cables and that must have electrocuted him”, he said.

    The BEDC spokesman, who debunked the speculation that most of those who vandalise power cables are from the power offices, said that residents must be at alert to challenge anyone they see at the transformer posing as an official of their firm and ascertain if indeed he has come from them.

    He promised that provided the people of the community are not owing huge debts of power bills, the damaged transformer would be fixed and power would be restored to the area in a few days’ time.

    Policemen from the Odo-Ado Police Station in the area, who had arrived the scene early enough when informed by the residents, disclosed that a cell phone and some electrical appliances were recovered from the deceased.

    They promised that investigations would be conducted with a view to finding out accomplices of the deceased. They later took the corpse and the ladder away from the scene in their van while the teeming crowd who had thronged the place rained curses on the deceased.

  • Omatseye’s To catch a Thief

    SIR: You correctly pinpointed the main reason the war against corruption in this country has not become a movement: Buhari is fighting the corruption war virtually alone – a situation worsened by his past military toga. Consensus can only happen the same way he and the APC won the last general elections – by intentionally and strategically enthusing and mobilizing the common people in this country a la public opinion polls and social media to massively push for the final demise of institutionalized corruption.

    This is where Lai Mohammed, who knew how to say and use the right words to oust the opposition out of power, but appears to be groping for words currently, comes in. President Buhari and Mohammed should deploy the National Orientation Agency (NOA) to galvanize the people; because the Machiavellian multi-nationals (including the banks who accepted large deposits of money in spite of extant anti-money laundering laws) in our clime will never wholeheartedly cooperate to fight corruption! Are they not the graders and custodians and beneficiaries of slush funds and  fuel subsidies? The confidence citizens have in them is at an all-time low, to say the least?

    All this present time when the unique opportunity for PMB to appeal to his large swath of supporters nationwide to join this anti-corruption fray; the moment when PMB still enjoys the support of many Nigerians at home and abroad, even across ethnic, political and religious divides; the moment when, ironically, the somewhat ‘balanced’ arrests of Dasuki, Kanu and El-Zakzaky lend credence to PMB as a man serious about fighting corruption – this is the opportune moment when the APC’s change mantra should be sold to the man in the street! “To kill corruption before corruption kills us” is a task that must be done”!

    Buhari should also establish something of a Leadership Forum, the ideals of the kind of transformative needed in a largely sit-tight, corrupt and unprincipled third world!

     

    • ‘Tunde Smith,

    Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State

  • To catch a thief

    To catch a thief

    The law embraces the apparent thief. The thief catcher, however, has to answer to the law. That is a paradox with a Nigerian DNA.

    So we saw Sambo Dasuki, bright-eyed but subdued, in his dark-hued danshiki walk voicelessly out of the court, flanked by lawyers and associates. We wonder what roils inside his billion-dollar soul. He has said little. He has neither denied the flurry of statements from so-called miscreants who famously crackled out of his office with choice dollars. Neither has he defended himself.

    Like a ram on sacrifice day, his face only reflects a muted melancholy. In dazed stupor, the ram keeps mum before the ominous eyes of butchers, the ferocious glitter of knives, the bowl awaiting its entrails and offal, the platform on which its neck will squish under the descending blade, the innocent giggle of children drooling for a happy meal.

    Of course, a small dug hole that indicates that burial is not an option except for the waste and blood that will rush out of the buxom flesh when the sullen ceremony of cutting and slashing is over.

    All of the butchery represents the people, who have already made judgments on Dasuki. But that is the majority opinion, but not the majority opinion of the law. Two majorities? By law, majority opinion is the opinion of a few people on the bench. It reflects the superciliousness of lawyers and judges that they equate their narrow standpoint with the viewpoint of all of us.

    President Muhammadu Buhari must be privately moaning this. He believes the guys stole. They broke the law. They farted on our holy of holies. They danced on the grave of our fighting men. They adorned themselves for that. Everybody knows it is wrong. So, why are they surprised when they are not allowed on the streets, but away in outer darkness, the key thrown away somewhere in the marshes of Bayelsa?

    With his septuagenarian laugh and martial eyeballs, Buhari is still not a temperament for 2016. He is a romantic of the 1980’s. In the presidential chat, the ramrod man of still winsome mien sparked fire in the eye when he reminded the questioners that somebody took N40 billion from the Central Bank, that the IDPs are groaning, that a man call El Zakzaky with his rambunctious men defied the army, and a good government is not supposed to sit idle and watch impunity like a Nollywood show.

    A deep chasm lay between the questioners and the former general. For him, it was a case of good versus evil. That made him into a sort of messianic force. The others thought good began with law and you could not be right with mere appeal to might like Greek philosopher Meno. If they invoked law, Buhari echoed law and order.

    Yet those who want law believe also that the good ought to be punished. The irony is that the law, as Thoreau famously said, never made anyone a whit more just. So, there. Kanu, by common consent, railed against the law. The Shiites have no right to deny anyone the right to move. Those who stole our money must account.

    But this is a democracy, and one of the lies of democracy is that majority always wins. This is one of those test cases of majority in a coma. Buhari’s war on corruption is a noble cause. But by defying the courts, it is a case of impunity chasing impunity. Two wrongs, where is the right?

    The real problem is that the war against corruption is not a movement. For now, it is still Buhari’s war. He is cheered, but from afar. It is a war of one for all, but the one is lonely. In a democracy, a sense of consensus can help drive the battle. It happens in what political scientists and sociologists call corporatism.

    That implies that all institutions instinctively work as one to pursue a collective interest. Liberal thinkers suspect such ideas because they bear the seed of tyranny. John Stuart Mill in his famous book, On Liberty, calls it the “Tyranny of the majority,” but Marxists wear it as an epaulette of honour.

    It has happened many times where a shared value or set of values is enshrined into the spirit of the law. But Buhari lacks the charisma, the strategy and even energy of moral suasion to spark such firelight of fervour across the land. If he had it, he would not have to disobey the judges.

    The bench would understand that thieves and miscreants have no place on the streets and they will find the law to keep them under lock and key. Gani Fawehinmi once told me in his chambers that, “if there is a case between a rich man and a poor man, I will find the law for the poor man.” It was a statement of values.

    The United States had a movement in the Progressives Era at the turn of the 20th century. With the big corporations running rampant with men like Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, etc, a spirit bubbled in the country to checkmate the acquisitive excesses of capitalism. Journalists, courts, businessmen, churches and a cadre of politicians were caught in this redemptive aura. The most famous member was Theodore Roosevelt who became president, one of their best ever. The movement succeeded.

    The danger is the possibility of a slide into dictatorship. Mussolini, Franco, etc exploited it. They did not triumph. French philosopher Rousseau designated it as “collective will” or “general will.” Mills objected and craved individual sovereignty.

    But both men, while denying it, agree that unfettered individuality and state-backed totalitarian control will destroy society. As Machiavelli – no lover of freedom – noted, “where everyone is free, no one is free.” French philosopher Michel Foucault noted test cases in his book, Madness and Civilisation, and concluded that inside freedom creeps subtle malignancies of tyranny.

    Buhari will have to look for the laws to help him. Or exercise patience. The civil society and media also need to isolate such judges as moral pariahs. They may know the law. But they might not know justice. Law is meaningless without justice. The individual is important. We cannot pursue the law without a Dasuki, or a Kanu or an El-Zakzaky knowing that the law took its full course.

    That is the essence of liberalism and the strength of democracy. Sophocles’ The ban play, Antigone, pursued the subject of individual right and state right. There was a famous line that “under the cover of darkness” the people support Antigone against the king. Zulu Sofola’s Wedlock of the Gods pursues the conflict of the individual and collective will.

    In his column, my former teacher Biodun Jeyifo (Happy 70th Birthday, by the way) reflected on a law now in the cooler to fast-track corruption cases, a thing Femi Falana has also harped upon. It is the measure of Buhari’s advisers that the legal framework for this battle was not put in place before launching the warfare.

    Not even the emotional framework is ready. Part of the problem is that Buhari is part soldier, part democrat, but the soldier has failed to part ways with the past. It’s a schizophrenic tension. He can learn from Churchill, De Gaulle, Eisenhower, etc who sloughed off their martial coats.

    If, for instance, Buhari steps down today, there is not a structure, not even a whiff of it, to point to the debris of his legacy. Not yet. He can start now.

     

  • ‘My wife is a thief’

    A middle-age man, Friday James, has prayed an Agege Customary Court in Lagos to dissolve his marriage because his wife, Linda is a thief.

    James said his wife was not caring, claiming that she spent their children’s school fees on several occasion.

    “Not only does my wife spend our children’s school fees she also steals from me. Whenever our children’s school proprietress calls me on phone, I know there is a problem.  She once stole N83, 000 from my wardrobe,” he said.

    The petitioner also said his wife spent the money she was to use to buy foodstuff.

    He said: “The painful thing is that she wouldn’t give account on what she spent the money on and it is annoying because I can’t continue to give her monthly allowance while I starve with our children. If she truly respects me as her husband, she won’t be doing all this.”

    James said he brought his wife to court to see if she would change.

    Linda said she disrespects her husband would because he is fond of harassing her in front of neighbours.

    “I didn’t steal from him. I only took N10, 000 from his wardrobe without his knowledge because I was told my father was ill and I thought I could refund it before he got to know. Whenever I requested for   money from him, he asks me to be patient till month end.

    “I think I have also made up my mind for dissolution because whenever our tenants misplace anything, my husband refers them to me and it is not right. I don’t know why he is complaining because when he knew I took his money, he took me outside and called me a thief in the presence of almost everyone who lives on our street,” Linda said.

    Linda also said her husband went to the extent of telling her boss she steals which led to her sack.

    She said: “As if all he had done wasn’t enough, I was sacked from my place of work because of his actions. I now sell noodles and eggs. I can’t continue to put up with his attitude.”

    The marriage produced three children.

    The court’s President, Pa Adekunle Williams, fixed a chamber discussion for after the whole proceedings.