Tag: Tribunal

  • Tribunal upholds Aliyu’s election as Sokoto Gov

    Tribunal upholds Aliyu’s election as Sokoto Gov

    The Sokoto State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal has dismissed the petition filed by Sa’idu Umar, candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) challenging the victory of All Progressives Congress(APC)‘s Ahmed Aliyu as Sokoto Governor in the March 18 poll.

    Sa’idu Umar approached the tribunal to dismiss Aliyu’s victory.

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Aliyu winner of the election, but Umar contested Aliyu’s victory claiming that Aliyu’s Deputy, Idris Gobir, was not qualified and that there was electoral fraud.

    Read Also: Sokoto govt to partner local, foreign investors to exploit solid resources

    But the tribunal, led by Justice Haruna Mshelia, dismissed the petition and upheld Aliyu’s victory.

    Details Shortly…

  • BREAKING: Tribunal affirms Kefas as Taraba Gov

    BREAKING: Tribunal affirms Kefas as Taraba Gov

    The Taraba State Governorship Election Tribunal has ruled that Agbu Kefas of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was legitimately elected Governor.

    The three-man panel of justices of the tribunal said the petition contesting Kefas’ election lacks validity and consequently dismissed it.

    Read Also: Petrol prices highest in Taraba, Borno, Benue

    Details shortly…

  • BREAKING: Tribunal sacks Enugu PDP lawmaker,  orders rerun

    BREAKING: Tribunal sacks Enugu PDP lawmaker,  orders rerun

    The National and State Assembly Election Petitions Tribunal sitting in Enugu has nullified the election of Okey Mbah of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as the winner of the March 18 House of Assembly poll for Nkanu East state constituency.

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had declared Mbah as the winner of the election, but the tribunal in its ruling on Friday, September 29, said the process did not meet the provisions of the 2022 electoral act.

    Read Also: Tribunal dismisses PDP’s petition in Kaduna poll

    The three-man panel led by Honourable Justice Adie Attoe Onyebueke while delivering their judgment on the petition filed by Labour Party candidate, Okwudiri Nnaji, ordered a rerun in some polling units in Ugbawka and Owo wards.

    The tribunal averred that the number of votes returned from the two wards are higher than the number of registered and accredited voters in those areas and faulted the return by INEC.

    It, however, ordered the electoral umpire to conduct a rerun election in the affected polling units within 90 days.

  • Tribunal dismisses PDP’s petition in Kaduna poll

    Tribunal dismisses PDP’s petition in Kaduna poll

    There is confusion in Kaduna State, following judgment of the Governorship Election Petition Tribunal. 

    Two parties in the dispute, Governor Uba Sani of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the PDP candidate, Isah Ashiru, are laying claim to victory and giving antagonistic interpretations to the judgment. 

    While Sani said the tribunal affirmed his victory, Ashiru disagreed, saying that the tribunal has displaced him and he should handover the certificate of return with him to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    After three months of legal fireworks, the tribunal gave two lead judgments on the the March 18 poll. 

    In a split judgment, the three-man panel dismissed the petition filed by the PDP candidate, Isah Ashiru, against Sani because it was filed out of time.

    The tribunal, which also declared the election as inconclusive, ordered a rerun in 22 polling units across four local governments. 

    In other states-Akwa Ibom and Plateau-ruling and opposition parties continued to count their gains and loses at the various tribunals. 

    In Ogun State, Governor Dapo Abiodun of the APC and his PDP challenger, Ladi Adebutu, will know their fate tomorrow at the tribunal.

    The chairman of the Kaduna panel, Justice Victor Oviawie, who delivered the five and half hours judgment, and a panel member, Justice N. Nonye, said since the petition was filed after seven days prescribed by the constitution, it was deemed to have been abandoned. 

    However, Justice K. Damlat, who gave a dissenting judgment, said the preliminary notice was properly filed and not abandoned.

    In compliance with the Supreme Court Standing Order, the tribunal looked at the merit of the petition, noting that the petitioner was able to prove beyond doubt that the election was invalid in 22 polling units across four local government areas.

    Also, Damlat and  Nonye noted that the number of registered voters who have collected their PVCs in the four local governments are more than the 10,806 votes margin with which Sani defeated Ashiru

    According to the tribunal, the election, to that extent, was inconclusive.

    But, Justice Oviawie differed, saying that the allegation that the election was invalid in those 22 polling units within four local governments were not proved beyond doubt.  

    Counsel to the APC, Sanusi Musa (SAN) hailed the verdict, adding that Sani will not appeal it because it favoured him and his party.  

    He said:  “The tribunal has dismissed the petition filed by PDP and its candidate in the lead judgment. The tribunal ruled that the petition has been abandoned and it was dismissed. We are happy with the judgment because it affirmed the election of Governor Uba Sani.”

    On the other aspect of the judgment, which focussed on the merit of the case, Musa said: “When the tribunal looked at the merit of the petition, two of the judges said election in 22 polling units was inconclusive because the number of registered voters in the is more than the margin between the winner and the first runners up”.

    However, counsel to the PDP,  Baba Aliyu, said Ashiru and PDP were not fully satisfied with the judgment, adding Ashiru Kudan should have been declared the winner, based on their arguments and facts laid before the tribunal.

    He hinted that the PDP candidate will appeal because they believed that with the evidence before the tribunal, the election should have been upturned.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Tribunal upholds Uba Sani’s election as Kaduna governor

    Sani: It’s victory for democracy 

    Sani hailed the judgment,  describing it as a victory for democracy, the rule of law, validation of the people’s will and God’s decree.

    But, Ashiru said he will pursue the case to a logical conclusion.

    In a statement he personally signed, Sani said:” On this historic day, I join the people of Kaduna State to celebrate this monumental victory for democracy. I consider this verdict, not only as a win, but a call to action, a call to deliver on our campaign promises as captured in the SUSTAIN agenda.

    “This victory is a testament to the strength of our great judicial institutions and a proud moment for me as one of the pioneer advocates for democratic governance in Nigeria decades ago.

    “The Deputy Governor, Dr Hadiza Sabuwa Balarabe, and I, express our immense gratitude to the good people of Kaduna State for their prayers, support and firm belief in our mandate. Indeed, your unshaken loyalty and confidence in our administration is the propellant to ensuring we continue to deliver on our promises to you.”

    The governor, who commending the tribunal judges for their diligence and steadfastness in handling the case, described their commitment to truth, justice and the rule of law as exemplary.

    He thanked his legal team for their representation, and praised the leadership and members of the ruling party for their unflinching support from the beginning of the tribunal. 

    Ashiru: I will appeal

    Ashiru expressed delight at the judgment, noting the tribunal’s pronouncement that the election was inconclusive and that there should be rerun in 22 polling units. 

    He said:  “First, I give glory to God Almighty for the progress made so far in our effort to reclaim the mandate given to us by the good people of Kaduna State. I also thank the people of the state for widely believing in me and the PDP.

    “Also, given the ruling of the Kaduna state election tribunal, it has become necessary to share with our teaming supporters, the true position of the ruling.

    “On the preliminary objection, the tribunal, based on the majority of 2:1 judges upheld the preliminary objection of the respondent to the effect that the application for pre-hearing was done prematurely, i.e. before the service of the last set of petitioners’ reply to the 2nd respondent’s reply to the petition was served.

    “However, the law enjoins the tribunal, as a trial court, to proceed to pronounce on the merit of the substantive suit so that in the event the court of appeal finds that the trial tribunal was wrong in its decision on the preliminary objection, it would have the benefit of pronouncing on the decision of the tribunal in the substantive matter.”

    He added: “Accordingly, the trial tribunal finds merit in the aspect of the petitioner’s case relative to the margin of win between the two leading candidates. The tribunal by a split decision of 2:1 accordingly, nullified the election of the governor of Kaduna state, ordered that the Certificate of Return be retrieved and fresh elections be conducted in some polling units in 4 LGAs and the outcome thereof be reckoned with before the declaration of the winner of the governorship election in Kaduna state.

    “I want to again thank the people of the state while urging them all to remain lawabiding while we pursue the appeal process.

    “One thing I can assure the good people Kaduna state is that I will pursue this mandate you freely gave me to its logical conclusion and by the grace of God, victory on our side,” Ashiru said.

     Akwa Ibom APC candidate losses

    The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Uyo dismissed the petition by the Akwa Ibom State APC candidate, Akanimo Udofia, challenging the victory of Governor Umo Eno of the PDP.

    Udofia had alleged that Eno presented forged documents to the  INEC, and that he also did not score the highest number of valid votes in the election. 

    He  also accused the 2nd respondent of being convicted by an Abuja Magistrate Court, insisting that he was not qualified to be fielded for elections.

    But the tribunal, in its unanimous decision, ruled that the allegations of substantial non-compliance with the electoral law in the conduct of the elections, was not sufficiently proven by the petitioners.

    The panel, chaired by Justice Adekunle Adeleye, also unanimously upheld  the judgment of the magistrate court, which had nullied Eno’s conviction.

    The tribunal disagreed with the petitioner on the legality of the setting aside of judgment by the same magistrate.

    It said: “It is not the duty of the tribunal to determine if the decision of the magistrate court to upturn its own judgment was justified. That falls under the jurisdiction of the Abuja High Court.”

    On the issue of the qualifications of the 2nd respondent, the tribunal maintained that the Supreme Court had already determined that Pastor Eno was the authentic owner of the WAEC certificates he submitted to INEC.

    The lead judgment  read by Justice Kadi Usman Sikudu, also held that the petitioners, having alleged that Eno was not the owner of the certificate he submitted to the 1st Respondent, INEC, did not produce any other person, as the authentic owner of the said 1981 WAEC certificate.

    The tribunal also expunged the evidence tendered by the petitioners’ subpoenaed witness, an acclaimed Interpol officer, who came to tender a report on the 2nd respondent’s WAEC results.  

    On the petitioners’ allegation that the PDP made use of public office holders such as one Uwem Ekanem as collation agent in Ikot Abasi local government area, the tribunal ruled that Uwem Ekanem’s membership of the board of Ibom Power Company cannot be classified as political office and that a party agent’s membership of a company’s board was not a sufficient reasonsfor a candidate to be disqualified.

    Udofia’s petition, according to the tribunal, lacked merits as the petitioner was not able to establish one polling unit in which there was non-compliance with the electoral law.

    The tribunal also dismissed the ground of challenging the eligibility of Senator Bassey Albert, who came second in the election.

    The tribunal insisted that at the time of the election, there was a subsisting appeal by the convicted YPP candidate and this made him eligible to contest in the election.

    The tribunal also dismissed the claims by APC that Senator Albert was not qualified to be fielded by YPP, having already vied for the same office in the PDP.

    It ruled that the petitioner not being a member of the YPP, had no basis to challenge the candidate fielded by another party and how he emerged as the candidate.

    The panel had previously thrown out petitions by governorship candidates of the New Nigeria, Peoples Party (NNPP), Senator John James Akpan Udoedehe, and African National Congress(ANC), Ezekiel Nyaetok, as lacking in merit.

    Abiodun, Adebutu know fate tomorrow 

    The Ogun State Election Petition sitting in Abeokuta will deliver judgment tomorrow on the governorship litigation involving Governor Abiodun and Adebutu. 

    Adebutu is praying the tribunal headed by Hamidu Kunaza to nullify the governor’s victory and declare him winner.

    Adebutu, among things, is also seeking an order of the tribunal to upturn the election of Abiodun, alleging that the poll was riddled with violence, irregularities and rigging.

    Ogun State APC Publicity Secretary, Tunde Oladunjoye, said justice would be done in respect of the matter.

    He said: “We are feeling very hopeful, having known we worked and earned the victory with the support of God and the good people of Ogun State who voted for continuity.

    “We believe justice would be done. There is no anxiety anywhere as we believe that not only did PDP lose the governorship election, the party also presented a porous petition that can’t stand thorough judicial scrutiny.  We call on our supporters to be calm and prayerful,” Oladunjoye said.

    In the final oral and written address through his counsel, Mr Chris Uche (SAN),  Adebutu, who is not in the country at the moment, had prayed the tribunal to grant all the reliefs, including the disqualification of Mr Abiodun as a candidate. 

    He alleged non-compliance by INEC with the Electoral Act and corrupt practices by the governor and his party, saying that the exercise was sabotaged by thugs who allegedly deployed violence in over 99 polling units to disenfranchise over 40,000 voters.

    But in his written address through his counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN),  Abiodun urged the tribunal to dismiss the petition filed by Adebutu and his party against his victory.

    Also, in their separate submissions, counsels to the 1st respondent (INEC), Mr Remi Olatubora (SAN), and the APC, Mr Tayo Oyetibo (SAN), told the tribunal that the petitioners failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Counsel to INEC, Olatubora, specifically asked the tribunal to dismiss the petition for absolutely lacking in merit and being a waste of the tribunal’s precious time.

    He posited that the allegations of corrupt practices, non-compliance, multiple thumb printing of ballot papers, ballot stuffing, and forgery as alleged by Adebutu and his party were not proved beyond any reasonable doubt

    He also described the testimony of the witnesses brought by the petitioners as heresy, which is not admissible in law.

    Also, Olanipekun, in his final address, described Adebutu’s petition as a mere academic exercise.

    He submitted that the petition was not duly signed or stamped and, therefore, lacked merit to be adopted..He urged the Tribunal to strike it out.

    Olanipekun said: “The document is not signed, not dated, no heading, no title, no identity, no signature, no stamp. The CTC has no signature,” Olanipekun alleged.

    Read Also: Kaduna Tribunal: PDP’s witnesses, evidence prove I won, says Uba Sani

    However, in his counter-argument, Uche told the tribunal that all documents presented by the petitioners were obtained from INEC.

     He urged the tribunal to declare Adebutu the winner of the governorship election or, in the alternative, order a rerun of the election in 99 polling units where he alleged that there were disruptions.

    Plateau tribunal upholds Joseph’s victory 

    The National and State Houses of Assembly  Election Tribunal sitting in Jos,  affirmed the victory of House of Representatives member from Langtang  North State Constituency, Nannim Joseph Langyi

    Justice Emmanuel Nwazunku, in his judgment, said the petitioners failed to discharge the burden of proof of over voting alleged in the petition filed by Nimchak Abel Nansak of the All Progressives Congress (APC), challenging the election of Joseph of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    The Tribunal ruled that PDP has solid structure in Plateau State after the Congress held on the 25th September, 2021, at Langfield Leisure Park Rayfield, Jos South Local Government Council and that the petitioner is neither member of the 3rd respondent and lacked the locus standi to challenge the nomination and sponsorship of the second respondent .

    Dismissing the petition, the tribunal said:”It is a waste of the tribunal precious time.”

    It was learned that, so many documents related to the petitioners were struck out for incompetent and didn’t add probative value to the Tribunal .

    The tribunal added: “ INEC monitored the conduct of the repeated Congresses held by the 3rd respondent in compliance to series of judgments of Hon. Justice Ishaya Kunda, Hon .Justice S.P.Gang and Justice Arum Ashoms of State High Court respectively.

    “The petitioners petition is not satisfactorily proved as required by law.I hereby dismissed the petition for lacking in merit and affirmed the return of the 2nd respondent Hon.Nannim Joseph Langyi of PDP as duly elected member representing Langtang North Constituency in the Plateau 10th Assembly.”

    “Also, Hon.Justice Williams Rotimi Olamide, affirmed the election of Hon.Paul Datugum of PDP for Qua’an-Pan North State Constituency of Plateau State House of Assembly, held on 18th March, 2023, after dismissing the petition filed by Mr.Dakogot Karyat of the APC.”

    Tribunal sacks PDP lawmaker

    The National and State Houses of Assembly Election Tribunal upturned the election of Timothy Dantong of the PDP and declared . Moses Dachum of APC winner of the House of Aselection in  Riyom State Constituency.

    The Justice B.M Tukur-led Panel held that as at the time of the election, PDP had no valid atructure to field a candidate as the party was still in disobedience to court order of Justice S P Gang of Plateau State High Court delivered on November 26, 2020.

    Tension as Oborevwori knows fate today 

    The Delta state Governorship Elections Petition Tribunal will deliver its verdict today on the petitions filed against the victory of Governor Sheriff Oborevwori.

    The Justice C.H Ahuchaogu-led three man panel will deliver judgement in the suits filed by the Labour Party (LP), Social Democratic Party (SDP), and All Progressives Congress (APC) challenging the victory of Delta Governor, Chief Sheriff Oborevwori.

    Dissatisfied with the declaration of Oborevwori as winner by the INEC, the three petitioners approached the tribunal seeking to overturn the victory

    Oborevwori’s rivals include APC governorship candidate (APC), ex Deputy Senate President, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege, Chief Kenneth Gbagi Social Democratic Party (SDP),and Labour Party’s Ken Pela.

    The  lower tribunal had dismissed the Labour Party’s petition on grounds that it abandoned it.

    However, the Appellate Court in Abuja ruled in favour of the petitioner, and ordered a retrial of the petition at the lower tribunal.

    All parties involved in the matter had in August adopted their written addresses wherein they argued for or against their respective clients.

    Justice Ahuchaogu had earlier in August reserved judgment in the petitions by the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Social Democratic Party (SDP).

    Justice Ahuchaogu reserved judgment on the Labour Party’s petition on September 26 following a retrial as ordered by the Appellate Court.

  • UPDATED: Controversy over tribunal judgment in Kaduna Gov tussle

    UPDATED: Controversy over tribunal judgment in Kaduna Gov tussle

    • Governor: my election upheld as petition was dismissed
    • PDP candidate: tribunal declared election inconclusive

    There was controversy on Thursday over the judgement of the Kaduna State Gubernatorial Election Petition Tribunal.

    While Governor Sani Uba of the All Progressives Congress (APC) said his election was upheld, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) gubernatorial candidate, Hon. Isah Mohammed Ashiru said the election was declared inconclusive.

    The judgment, which took five and half hours, saw the three-man panel of judges led by Justice Victor Oviawie, Justice K. Damlat and Justice N. Nonye, struck out the petition because the preliminary notice was filed out of time after the seven days prescribed by the constitution and was deemed to have been abandoned.

    Giving a split judgment, Justice Victor Oviawie said the preliminary notice was filed outside the seven-day prescribed by the Constitution from the day when the main case was filed, adding that the petition was deemed to be abandoned.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Tribunal upholds Uba Sani’s election as Kaduna governor

    This judgment was also backed by Justice N. Nonye while Justice K. Damlat differed, who argued that the preliminary notice was properly filed and not abandoned.

    However, in compliance with the Supreme Court standing order, the Tribunal went ahead to look at the merit of the petition while it has been discussed.

    The Tribunal, in a majority judgement supported by Justices K. Damlat and N. Nonye, said the petitioner was able to prove beyond doubt that the election was invalid in 22 polling units across four local government areas, adding that the number of registered voters who have collected their PVCs in the four local governments are more than the 10,806 votes margin with which Uba Sani defeated Isah Ashiru, thus the election was inconclusive.

    The Lead Judge, Justice Victor Oviawie differed, as he believed that the allegations that the elections were invalid in those 22 polling units within four local governments were not proved beyond doubt.

    Reacting, Counsel to the APC, Sanusi Musa SAN, said they were happy with the judgment adding that they have no course to file any appeal as the judgment was in their favour.

    According to him: “The tribunal has dismissed the petition filed by PDP and its candidate in the lead judgment. The tribunal ruled that the petition has been abandoned and it was dismissed. We are happy with the judgment because it affirmed the election of Governor Uba Sani.”

    Speaking on the other judgment by the tribunal which looked at the merit of the case, Barr. Musa said: “When the tribunal looked at the merit of the petition, two of the judges said election in 22 polling units is inconclusive because the number of registered voters in the is more than the margin between the winner and the first runners up”.

    Counsel to the PDP, Barr. Baba Aliyu said they are not fully satisfied with the judgment adding that they wanted their client, Hon. Isah Ashiru Kudan to be declared winner of the election based on their arguments and facts they laid before the tribunal.

    He however stated that they would probably appeal the judgment because they believed that with the evidence before the tribunal the election should have been upturned.

  • BREAKING: Tribunal sacks PDP lawmaker in Plateau, declares APC candidate winner

    BREAKING: Tribunal sacks PDP lawmaker in Plateau, declares APC candidate winner

    The National State Houses of Assembly election Tribunal has upturned the election of Timothy Dantong of the PDP and declared Moses Dachum of APC winner of the March 18, Riyom state constituency of the Plateau State House of Assembly Election.

    Read Also: BREAKING: Tribunal set to deliver judgment in Kaduna Gov case via zoom

    Justice B.M Tukur-led panel held that at the time of the election, PDP had no valid structure to fill in a candidate as the party was still in disobedience to a court order of Justice S P Gang of Plateau State High Court delivered on November 26, 2020.

    Details shortly…

  • Tribunal quashes A’Ibom APC gov candidate’s petition against Gov Eno

    Tribunal quashes A’Ibom APC gov candidate’s petition against Gov Eno

    The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Uyo on Thursday, September 28, trashed a petition brought by the Akwa Ibom state governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Akanimo Udofia, challenging the election of Pastor Umo Eno of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as the winner of the March 18, elections.

    The grounds Udofia sought for the disqualification of Pastor Eno was that he presented forged documents to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and also did not score the highest number of valid votes in the March 18, 2023 Governorship elections.

    Udofia also accused the 2nd respondent of being convicted by an Abuja Magistrate Court, hence not qualified to be fielded for elections.

    But in favour of Gov Umo Eno, the 2nd respondent, the Tribunal in its unanimous decision ruled that the allegations of substantial noncompliance with the electoral law in the conduct of the elections, was not sufficiently proven by the petitioners in their case.

    Read Also: BREAKING: Tribunal set to deliver judgment in Kaduna Gov case via zoom

    The Justice Adekunle Adeleye headed panel also unanimously ruled that the magistrate court in its judgment, nullified its earlier conviction of Pastor Umo Eno and that once a judgement is nullified, it ceases to exist.

    The tribunal disagreed with the petitioner on the legality of the setting aside of judgement by the same magistrate.

    It read: “It is not the duty of the tribunal to determine if the decision of the magistrate court to upturn its own judgment was justified. That falls under the jurisdiction of the Abuja High Court.”

    On the issue of the qualifications of the 2nd respondent, the Tribunal maintained that the Supreme Court had already determined that Pastor Eno was the authentic owner of the WAEC certificates he submitted to INEC.

    The lead judgement read by Justice Kadi Usman Sikudu, also held that the petitioners have alleged that Pastor Eno was not the owner of the certificate he submitted to the 1st Respondent, INEC, did not produce any other person, as the authentic owner of the said 1981 WAEC certificate.

    The tribunal also expunged the evidence tendered by the petitioners’ subpoenaed witness, an acclaimed Interpol officer, who came to tender a report on the 2nd respondent’s WAEC results. 

    On the petitioners’ allegation that the PDP made use of public office holders such as one Uwem Ekanem as a collation agent in Ikot Abasi local government area, the tribunal ruled that Uwem Ekanem’s membership of the board of Ibom Power Company, cannot be classified as political office and that a party agent’s membership of a company’s board was not sufficient reasons for a candidate to be disqualified.

    Akanimo Udofia’s petition, according to the Tribunal, lacked merits as the petitioner was not able to establish one polling unit in which there was noncompliance with the electoral law in the March 18 Governorship elections.

    The tribunal also dismissed the ground of the petition by Mr Udofia, challenging the eligibility of Senator Bassey Albert, who came second in the election.

    The tribunal insisted that at the time of the elections, there was a subsisting appeal by the convicted YPP candidate and this made him eligible to contest in the elections.

    The tribunal also dismissed the claims by APC that Senator Albert was not qualified to be fielded by YPP having already vied for the same office in the PDP.

    It ruled that the petitioner not being a member of the YPP, had no basis to challenge who that party fielded and how he emerged as their candidate.

    The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Uyo earlier had the previous day, thrown out petitions by Governorship candidates of the NNPP, Senator John James Akpan Udoedehe, and ANC, Ezekiel Nyaetok, as lacking in merit.

  • Tribunal affirms Governor Eno’s victory, dismisses ADC, NNPP’s candidates petitions

    Tribunal affirms Governor Eno’s victory, dismisses ADC, NNPP’s candidates petitions

    The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Uyo has discarded the petition brought before it by the governorship candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Ezekiel Nyaetok, challenging the election of Pastor Umo Eno of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    The tribunal had earlier thrown out suit number EPW/AKS/GOV/03/23, brought by the governorship candidate of the NNPP, Senator John James Akpan Udoedehe, challenging the election of the governor.

    Among other grounds, Nyaetok of ADC sought the disqualification of Pastor Umo Eno, alleging that he was convicted by a Magistrate Court in Abuja and that having been convicted, all votes accrued to him during the March 18 elections ought to be nullified.

    He also challenged other candidates who scored more votes than him, alleging that they were handicapped by litigations and legal bars which hampered their eligibility to participate in the elections. 

    But delivering judgement on the matter, Justice Adekunle Adeleye chaired the panel and unanimously ruled that the same magistrate court presided by Emeka Iyama, delivered a judgment, nullifying its earlier conviction of Pastor Umo Eno and that once a judgement is nullified, it ceases to exist.

    The tribunal also held that Nyaetok’s petition lacked merit as the petitioner was not able to establish one polling unit in which there was noncompliance with the electoral law in the March 18 Governorship elections.

    Read Also: I can’t fight my predecessor, says Governor Eno

    After about one hour and thirty minutes of detailed and considered judgement, the governorship election panel, in a unanimous decision concluded that the petition by Senator John James Akpanudoedehe and his party against Gov Umo Bassey Eno, the PDP, and INEC deserves no less a verdict than a dismissal for lacking in merit.

    The governorship election petition by the former senator followed the defective trajectory of two previous cases dismissed by the tribunal two weeks ago, by virtue of the attempt to resurrect the subject matter of certificate forgery leveled against Governor Eno, which was previously buried by the Supreme Court.

    Counsel to the PDP had told the tribunal that the petition was “most unambitious”, as the Petitioners neglected and or refused to declare what they really wanted.

    Akpanudoedehe of the NNPP had in his arguments claimed that Gov. Umo Eno was a convict by the Wuse Magistrate Court, Abuja, thereby robbing him of the qualification to have contested the March 18, 2023 governorship election.

    He prayed the Tribunal to order that the election be cancelled, and a fresh one conducted within 90 days.

    He also alleged that the Governor was born in Enugu, even though he declined to show proof of this claim as he neither front-loaded nor relied upon any document to back it.

    Surprisingly, of the over 5000 voting units in the state, the NNPP candidate called only 2 witnesses with himself as one of the two.

    Under cross-examination, the NNPP gubernatorial candidate admitted, when shown the enrolled order of the Wuse Magistrate Court repudiating its judgement orders, that he lacked knowledge of the existence of the order before his petition.

    Counsel to the PDP and Pastor Umo Eno had noted in their submission that the NNPP petition is most unambitious, as the petitioner has not only failed to prove the criminal allegation of forgery but also failed to state what he wants.

    The tribunal, presided over by Justice Adekunle Adeleye, ruled that lacking in merit, the petition had to be confined to the trashcan.

    Reacting to the judgement, Counsel to the PDP, Barr Emmanuel Enoidem said the judgement was in strong agreement with the point of law.

    Enoidem said the petitioners failed to prove that Pastor Umo Eno did not meet the constitutional entry requirements for office of the Governor, adding that most of their claims were pre-election matters which they could not also substantiate.

  • Tribunal throws out Sani, APC’s 2nd motion to dismiss Ashiru, PDP’s petition

    Tribunal throws out Sani, APC’s 2nd motion to dismiss Ashiru, PDP’s petition

    The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Kaduna has dismissed the second preliminary objection filed by Governor Uba Sani and All Progressives Congress (APC) to dismiss the petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Isah Mohammed Ashiru.

    Sani and the APC, who are the second and Thursday respondents in the case, argued the petitioners had abandoned their petition.

    The Tribunal however dismissed the motion.

    The Tribunal is delving into determining the main petition.

    The PDP is challenging the election of Uba Sani as the Governor of Kaduna State on the grounds of alleged irregularities and electoral fraud, saying that its Candidate (Isa Mohammed Ashiru) won the election. 

    During the hearing of the petition, the PDP and Ashiru called 24 witnesses and presented claims and documents to prove their case. 

    Read Also: Tribunal sacks Ondo lawmaker

    However, at the close of hearing, all the parties presented their final written addresses before the Tribunal, with APC’s Uba Sani saying that, the petitioners unwittingly helped in proving that, he won the March 18 governorship election, in the course of challenging his victory. 

    Uba Sani’s legal team led by a former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Chief Bayo Ojo, SAN, argued that, the petitioners had helped in proving he won the poll fair and square, pointing in particular to the admission of a star witness for the petitioner, Bonett Gwazah, a senior system analyst (SSA) in the VR/ICT Department of INEC in Kaduna State.  

    In their final address, the PDP and Ashiru argued that, that two conflicting election results emerged from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the governorship election in the state.

    Ashiru through his lead counsel, Oluwole Iyamu, SAN argued that INEC is responsible for the manipulation of election results.

    He equally alleged over voting and abuse of electoral processes and therefore asked for the reversal of the INEC declaration that produced Governor Uba Sani.

    Details shortly….

  • Tribunal rejects Gov Sani’s motion to dismiss Ashiru, PDP’s petition

    Tribunal rejects Gov Sani’s motion to dismiss Ashiru, PDP’s petition

    The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Kaduna has dismissed preliminary objection filed by Uba Sani on the timeliness of the petition  filed by the PDP and its Candidate, Isah Mohammed Ashiru.

    Sani’s legal team argued the petition of the petitioners was filed outside the 21 days allowed by the law.

    The court affirmed that the petition was filed on 10th April 2023. 

    Read Also: BREAKING: Tribunal set to deliver judgment in Kaduna Gov case via zoom

    The three man panel led by Justice Victor Oviawe, therefore dismissed the petition of Governor Uba Sani who is the second respondent in the case.

    The tribunal is deciding on another potion filed by the defendants, which asked the court to dismiss the PDP and Ashiru’s petition for abandoning their petition.

    Details shortly…