Tag: Trump

  • FULL LIST: Countries that have joined Trump’s Board of Peace

    FULL LIST: Countries that have joined Trump’s Board of Peace

    U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed Board of Peace is gradually taking shape, with several countries formally accepting invitations to become part of the new and controversial global initiative aimed at resolving international conflicts.

    Trump first announced the idea in September last year while presenting his strategy to end the war in Gaza. He later broadened the mandate of the Board, saying it would address conflicts beyond the Middle East and serve as a global platform for peacebuilding.

    According to a draft charter reviewed by Reuters, Trump is set to serve as the inaugural chairman of the Board, with wide-ranging executive powers that include the authority to veto decisions and remove member states. Membership is designed to last for three years, although countries willing to contribute $1 billion to fund the initiative would be granted permanent membership.

    The White House has already named several high-profile figures to the founding Executive Board, including U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

    A senior White House official disclosed that about 35 countries have so far agreed to join the Board, out of roughly 50 invitations issued. The countries span multiple regions, including the Middle East, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America, and include both long-standing U.S. allies and more controversial participants.

    Middle Eastern countries make up a significant portion of the early supporters, alongside nations whose leaders maintain close political or personal relationships with Trump. Armenia and Azerbaijan have also accepted invitations, following a U.S.-brokered peace agreement between the two countries last year.

    Read Also: Trump rules out force, renews Greenland demands at Davos

    One of the most controversial acceptances came from Belarus, whose president, Alexander Lukashenko, has faced years of diplomatic isolation from Western governments over human rights concerns and his support for Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    Here is a list of Countries That Have Accepted Trump’s Invitation:

    Middle East & North Africa

    Israel

    Saudi Arabia

    United Arab Emirates

    Bahrain

    Jordan

    Qatar

    Egypt

    Morocco

    Europe

    Turkey

    Hungary

    Kosovo

    Armenia

    Azerbaijan

    Belarus

    Asia

    Pakistan

    Indonesia

    Uzbekistan

    Kazakhstan

    Vietnam

    Latin America

    Paraguay

  • US ‘annihilating’ terrorists in Nigeria, says Trump

    US ‘annihilating’ terrorists in Nigeria, says Trump

    United States President Donald Trump on Thursday claimed that American forces were ‘annihilating’ terrorists in Nigeria whom he accused of killing Christians in large numbers.

    “Many good things are happening,” Trump said. “In Nigeria, we are annihilating terrorists who are killing Christians. We’ve hit them very hard. They’ve killed thousands and thousands of Christians.”

    Trump made the remarks at the Board of Peace signing ceremony held on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, as he spoke on what he described as progress in global peace and security efforts.

    Nigerian authorities, however, have consistently rejected such a framing of the country’s security challenges.

    The Federal Government has maintained that terrorism and violent extremism affect all communities, regardless of religion, and that victims of insurgency include Muslims, Christians and others.

    National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu, Defence Minister General Christopher Gwabin Musa, Chief of Defence Staff General Olufemi Oluyede and Inspector General of Police Kayode Egbetokun have all stated in various briefings that Nigeria’s security crisis is driven by a complex mix of terrorism, banditry and organised criminal violence, rather than a singular religious agenda.

    Read Also: Trump rules out force, renews Greenland demands at Davos

    Speaking at the ceremony, Trump emphasised the significance of the newly unveiled initiative, saying, “What we’re doing is so important. This is something I really wanted to be here and do, and I could think of no better place.”

    Trump also spoke extensively about Gaza, insisting that the territory must be demilitarised and rebuilt.

    “Gaza has to be demilitarised and rebuilt nicely,” he said, warning militant groups to disarm. “If Hamas doesn’t do what they promised, they must lay down arms, or it’ll end them. They grew up with rifles.”

    He linked developments in the Middle East and Nigeria to the work of the Board of Peace, which he said was drawing growing international interest.

    On the composition of the new peace body, the US president said participation was expected to expand.

    “Everybody wants to be on the Board of Peace. These are just the countries here now; loads more will join,” he said.

  • Trump rules out force, renews Greenland demands at Davos

    Trump rules out force, renews Greenland demands at Davos

    • • U.S. President rebukes Carney

    United States (U.S.) President Donald Trump said yesterday he would not take over Greenland by force, but stuck firmly to his demands for control of the Danish territory during a speech in Davos and hinted at consequences if his ambitions were thwarted.

    “People thought I would use force, but I don’t have to use force,” Trump said at the World Economic Forum annual meeting in the Swiss Alpine resort. “I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force,” he added, without mentioning his threat of tariffs.

    Trump said he wanted immediate negotiations on a U.S. acquisition of Greenland, which is a Danish territory, and warned: “They have a choice. You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative, or you can so no, and we will remember.”

    Trump, however, took a swipe at the Canadian prime minister when he said Canada should be “grateful” to the U.S., following Mark Carney’s widely praised speech at the World Economic Forum (WEF).

    “We’re building a golden dome that’s going to, just by its very nature, be defending Canada. Canada gets a lot of freebies from us, by the way. They should be grateful also, but they’re not,” he said in Davos, Switzerland.

    Referring to Carney, Trump added, “I watched the prime minister yesterday. He wasn’t so grateful.”

    “They should be grateful to the U.S. Canada lives because of the United States. Remember that Mark the next time you make your statements,” he said.

    Read Also: Our strategies for Tinubu’s victory in 2027, by Yilwatda

    It came after Carney’s speech drew global attention and a standing ovation after he warned that the post-war rules-based international order is fading and said middle powers like Canada must adapt to a world of growing rivalry and coercion.

    Saying that “the old order is not coming back. We shouldn’t mourn it,” said Carney. “Nostalgia is not a strategy.”

    “Canadians know that our old, comfortable assumption, that our geography and alliance memberships automatically conferred prosperity and security — that assumption is no longer valid,” he said.

    Relations between Canada and the U.S. have been strained after Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian goods and later halted talks because of an anti-tariff advertisement aired in the US.

    U.S. stocks staged a modest recovery after the sharpest equities selloff in three months, with the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab up about 1% after Wednesday’s remarks by Trump, who attributed the prior dip in markets to his comments on Greenland.

    Rather than focusing on the economic message his aides had previewed, Trump delivered more than an hour of scolding and threats aimed at countries already unnerved by his push to seize territory from Denmark, which is a longtime U.S. NATO ally.

    He chastised Europeans on issues ranging from wind power and the environment to immigration and geopolitics, while casting himself as a defender of Western values.

    And while he took the threat of force off the table for Greenland, Trump bragged about U.S. military might, citing recent operations such as the shock ousting of Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro earlier this month.

    Calling Denmark “ungrateful,” the Republican U.S. president played down the territorial dispute as a “small ask” over a “piece of ice” and said an acquisition would be no threat to the NATO alliance, which includes Denmark and the United States.

    “It’s clear from this speech that the president’s ambition is intact,” Denmark’s Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Copenhagen, adding: “In isolation it’s positive that the president says what he does regarding the military, but that does not make the problem go away”.

    Trump said Greenland is crucial to the “Golden Dome” missile‑defense system and urged immediate negotiations.

    “No nation or group of nations is in any position to be able to secure Greenland other than the United States,” said Trump, who on four occasions mistakenly referred to Greenland as Iceland, another NATO member state.

    Trump, who marked the end of a turbulent first year in office on Tuesday, is set to overshadow the agenda of the WEF, where global elites chew over economic and political trends.

    NATO leaders have warned that Trump’s Greenland strategy could upend the alliance, while the leaders of Denmark and Greenland have offered a wide array of ways for a greater U.S. presence on the strategic island territory of 57,000 people.

    His threat at the weekend to impose rising tariffs on eight European countries, including NATO allies, if they do not support his acquisition of the Arctic island has rattled politicians in Europe and jolted markets.

    The European Parliament is suspending its work on the European Union’s trade deal with the United States ⁠in protest at Trump’s Greenland demands.

    “We want a ⁠piece of ice for world protection, and they won’t give it,” Trump said in his speech to a congress hall filled with what he called “so many friends, a few enemies.”

    His remarks drew uncomfortable looks and light laughter from the audience in Davos, but most were silent.

    Meanwhile, hundreds of delegates gathered in the lobby to listen to or watch Trump’s speech on video monitors or on mobile phones. After an hour, most had tuned out and resumed chatting.

    Trump also used his speech to settle scores on other grievances. He rounded on Britain over extracting insufficient oil from the North Sea, Switzerland over its trade surplus in goods with the U.S., France over its pharmaceutical policy, Canada for what he saw as its ingratitude and NATO for its unwillingness to bend to U.S. interests.

  • Türkiye, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, others join Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’

    Türkiye, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, others join Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’

    The foreign ministers of eight countries – Türkiye, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – have welcomed United States President Donald Trump’s invitation to their leaders to join the “Board of Peace” for Gaza.

    “The ministers announce their countries’ shared decision to join the Board of Peace,” said a joint statement issued by the Turkish Foreign Ministry.

    “Each country will sign the joining documents according to their respective relevant legal and other necessary procedures, including the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates, that have already announced to join,” the statement said.

    Read Also: Our strategies for Tinubu’s victory in 2027, by Yilwatda

    The ministers, it said, reaffirmed their countries’ support for the peace efforts led by Trump and reiterated their commitment to supporting the implementation of the mandate of the Board of Peace as a transitional administration, as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict and endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2803.

    The plan seeks to consolidate a permanent ceasefire, back Gaza’s reconstruction, and foster a just and lasting peace rooted in the Palestinian right to self-determination and statehood in accordance with international law, thereby promoting security and stability for all states and peoples of the region.

    Last week, the White House announced the formation of the Board of Peace alongside the approval of a National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, one of four bodies designated to manage the transitional phase in the enclave.

    The creation of the board coincided with the launch of phase two of a ceasefire agreement, which halted Israel’s war on Gaza that has killed more than 71,000 people and injured over 171,000 others since October 2023.

  • Trump and the politics of brinkmanship

    Trump and the politics of brinkmanship

    It seems the American president, Donald John Trump, is determined to change the world if the rest of us permit him to without United Nations notice of a reason for belligerency or the interest of global peace or threat to the security of the USA. Therefore, having to embark on retaliatory action in the interest of self-defence and without declaration of formal war on Venezuela approved by the US Congress, he nevertheless sent an armada of a carrier group of ships, frigates, air armaments and the Delta Strike group and assorted coastal ships and previous deployments of the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) and FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) and DIA (Defence Intelligence Agency) to the coast of Venezuela. It did not come as a surprise when on the morning of January 3, the USA government announced the capture of the president of the Republic of Venezuela, his wife and one of his children while asleep and brought them to New York where they were detained in a New York prison for drugs and gun running thereby putting, at risk the security of the United States. 

    Legally, the US was violating international law and the norms of international diplomacy. The situation was made more surprising when Donald Trump announced that he was going to run the country and invite big American oil companies to return to Venezuela and redevelop the oil wells which they owned before the oil business was nationalised by previous governments of Venezuela. Then while the public was wondering how he would single-handedly run a whole country three times the size of California, it was announced that the US government was leaving virtually intact, the government of President Nicholas Maduro in power without Maduro because his vice president, of Delcy Eloina Rodriguez Gomez was sworn in as president. This was rather bewildering because people expected Madame Carina Machado, the new Nobel laureate for peace would play some important role in post-Maduro government but Trump dismissed her as not popular despite the fact that the democratic coalition she organised won democratic elections last year in Venezuela which Maduro rigged against her.  

    It seems the American government had learnt a bitter lesson from its experience in Iraq where it dismissed the entire Saddam Hussein government only to face in later years, rebellion under ISIS and the Al Baghdadi Caliphate. This may be understandable but is it wise and justiciable? The case is still in court and postponed to start litigation in March.  The case remains unresolved while the whole world is watching and waiting. Trump directed his attention to other areas of the world as if he is driven to action by unseen forces. He picked on annexation of Danish Greenland and war on the Islamic Republic of Iran following street demonstration against the government of Ayatollah Khamenei. Any intelligent observer would ask on how many fronts of war can the US fight on? It was known at the time that a big fraction of the naval strength of the USA was committed and tied down in the Caribbean front in Venezuela. Trump unfortunately encouraged the Iranians to continue their demonstration against their government and promised that help was on the way from the USA. Some days later he backed down saying the Iranian government had not carried through execution of about 800 people arrested for demonstration against the Iranian regime. Then to palliate the anger and discontent of Iranian rebels, he began to say the time for looking for a new Iranian leader was ripe to which the Iranian government in a withering  attack told him if he killed their Ayatollah Khamenei, he would pay dearly for it.

    Read Also: Bello Turji in panic, disarray amidst intensified onslaught -Military

    Now apart from sending ICE paratroopers to Minneapolis and threatening war against  states run by the Democratic Party and threatening to issuing a declaration of insurrection and sending troops to put down demonstrators against forceful deportation of illegal immigrants, as I am writing this piece on the birthday of Dr Martin Luther King (January 19) who in the 1960s led protests by black people and their supporters against more than a century of denial of rights and economic opportunity and equality which culminated in the Civil Rights laws of 1965 which Donald Trump has been eroding gradually, his government has one by one undermined rights of black peoples to equal education by getting rid of rights reserved for minorities in education and employment describing them as racist attack on whites. He has been getting rid of black peoples through so-called reduction of the federal government and blocking opportunities for blacks even in sports.  While doing this, he is imposing psychological damage on blacks because he is banning African people from coming to the US because Trump is characterising them as people from “shit-hole countries” while appealing to countries in the Scandinavian region to come to the USA since they will be welcome. He is also asking whites from South Africa to leave the republic and emigrate to the US because he said they were being killed or victimised in the Union of South Africa without evidence. He invited the president of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphoza and humiliated him before the whole world.

    He is totally unaware that he is building a black bomb for future explosion of discontentment. He has started threatening Greenland which he said the USA needs to protect itself from threats from Russia and China in an increasingly strategically important sea route because of the melting ice in the Arctic. We are also aware of Trump’s secret plan to build on Greenland an anti-nuclear shield to protect the USA against possible nuclear attack either by Russia or China. We now have a situation in which European countries, formerly solid allies like Denmark, Norway and other Scandinavian countries and also France and Germany and other allies of the USA which are members of NATO are opposed to Trump’s policy on Greenland and are ready to resist Trump’s braggadocio.

    Although nobody expects American troops to start shooting Europeans but anything is possible in a situation when Trump’s cabinet ministers and even the American vice president, JD Vance openly say America represents strength and power while Europe is a symbol of weakness. If Trump goes ahead with his so-called military option against the Kingdom of Denmark in order to seize Greenland, that will signal the end of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

    Sometimes one wonders if one should take President Trump seriously. How does one interpret the seriousness of a man who accepts the Nobel Prize from Machado and hangs it prominently in the White House even though everyone knows it is not transferable? How serious can one take him when he publicly writes an open letter to the Norwegian prime minister for not ensuring that an independent body like the Nobel Committee did not give him the Nobel Prize for peace which he claimed he has earned for stopping eight wars which everyone disagrees and disputes? It seems as if he feels this justifies his bellicose relationship with Denmark a sister Scandinavian country!

    With US piling pressure on European countries in order to force them to support the possible seizure of Greenland, Europe is beginning to ask whether America is a worthy ally or a bully using them in its struggle and competition for world power. It is becoming clear that European support for America is no longer guaranteed. Yet America would need European support if America decides to stop justified Chinese future unification with the island of Taiwan. The same America is alienating India by putting up tariff against it and China for buying oil from Russia and thus helping Russia to have money in prosecuting the war against Ukraine.

    I personally think it will get to a point when the Chinese that holds substantial portion of American debt in form of Treasury Bills, the Norwegians and others begin to unleash on the market their holdings of American treasury bills and treasury bonds and this will simply expose the fact that for years, America has enjoyed living on the backs of the rest of the world by using the dollar as a reserve currency without controlling the printing and issuance of the currency. The whole world since 1945 has been working to support the American economy and to allow Americans to live well to the disadvantage of the rest of the world.

    President Trump’s rambling policy may usher in the end of the American global military but most importantly financial domination. What is Africa or Nigeria’s response to what the Canadian Prime Minister Mike Carney says?  He said there is a rupture in the world order and not a transition and countries have to determine to forge economic ties with groups with similarities of ideas goals and needs instead of fixed and rigid permanent organisations dominated by global or single hegemon doing whatever pleases it at any given time without considerations of the interests of other members of the global community. Nigeria must organise, albeit clandestinely, without too much noise. I hope we are not just going to continue with our old politics without ideas, plans or goals as long as we get elected into office.

  • Trump on Greenland: “We’ll work something out”

    Trump on Greenland: “We’ll work something out”

    President Donald Trump has said that the United States (U.S.) and its NATO allies would “work something out” over the Greenland dispute.

    “I think that we will work something out where NATO’s going to be very happy and where we’re going to be very happy,” Trump said.

    He said this few hours before departing for the World Economic Forum in Switzerland.

    At the same time, Trump reiterated his view that the U.S. needed Greenland for security purposes.

    Asked how far he would be willing to go to bring the island under U.S. control, he replied: “You’ll find out.”

    Read Also: Trump links Greenland threat to Nobel Peace Prize snub

    Trump also said the U.S. had planned a number of meetings on Greenland during the high profile gathering in the Swiss alpine resort of Davos.

    He has previously said that talks involving the parties to the dispute between the U.S. and Europe would take place on the sidelines of the forum, but did not specify who would attend.

    The Republican president has left little doubt that he wanted to bring Greenland, which belongs to Denmark, under U.S. control.

    After European NATO allies voiced solidarity with Denmark and Greenland, Trump said he would impose punitive tariffs from Feb. 1, to pressure opponents of a sale of the Arctic Island to the U.S…

    Asked about opposition among Greenlanders to joining the U.S., Trump said: “When I speak to them, I’m sure they’ll be thrilled.”

    (dpa/NAN) 

  • Trump links Greenland threat to Nobel Peace Prize snub

    Trump links Greenland threat to Nobel Peace Prize snub

    • European Union prepares to retaliate

    United States (U.S.) President Donald Trump has linked his drive to take control of Greenland to his failure to win the Nobel Peace Prize, saying he no longer thought “purely of Peace” as the row over the island threatened to reignite a trade war with Europe.

    Asked by NBC News in a brief telephone interview yesterday if he would use force to seize Greenland, Trump said “No comment,” adding he would “100 per cent” follow through on plans to hit European nations with tariffs without a Greenland deal.

    Trump has intensified his push to wrest sovereignty over Greenland from fellow NATO member, Denmark, prompting the European Union to weigh hitting back with its own measures.

    The dispute is threatening to upend the NATO alliance that has underpinned Western security for decades and which was already under strain over the war in Ukraine and Trump’s refusal to protect allies which do not spend enough on defence.

    Trump’s threat has rattled European industry and sent shockwaves through financial markets amid fears of a return to the volatility of 2025’s trade war, which only eased when the sides reached tariff deals in the middle of the year.

    In a text message on Sunday to Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere, Trump said: “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”

    Read Also: Alleged terror financing: DSS arrests ex-AGF Malami

    Norway’s government released the messages yesterday under the country’s freedom of information act.

    Stoere had sent an initial message on behalf of himself and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, calling for de-escalation of tensions and suggesting a call, eliciting a response from Trump less than half an hour later.

    The Norwegian Nobel Committee annoyed Trump by awarding the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize not to him but to Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado.

    In his message, Trump also repeated his accusation that Denmark cannot protect Greenland from Russia or China.

    “… And why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway?” he wrote, adding: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”

    Trump vowed on Saturday to implement a wave of increasing tariffs from February 1 on EU members Denmark, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Finland, along with Britain and Norway, until the U.S. is allowed to buy Greenland, home to only 57,000 people.

    “We are living in 2026, you can trade with people, but you don’t trade people,” Denmark’s Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said during a visit to London  yesterday.

    In a post on Facebook, Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said the territory should be allowed to decide its own fate.

    “We will not let ourselves be pressured. We stand firm on dialogue, on respect and on international law,” he said.

    Denmark’s military told Reuters that planes carrying Danish soldiers and Army Commander Peter Boysen would land in Kangerlussuaq, western Greenland,  yesterday, describing it as a “substantial contribution” to the Arctic Endurance military exercise.

    Norway’s Stoere amended his schedule, announcing that he would attend the World Economic Forum in Davos on Wednesday and Thursday, overlapping with Trump’s planned appearance at the annual gathering of the global political and business elite.

    Trump is expected to deliver a keynote address on Wednesday in his first appearance at the conference in six years.

    German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said he too would try to meet Trump on Wednesday, adding that a trade dispute was not wanted. “But if we are confronted with tariffs that we consider unreasonable, then we are capable of responding,” Merz said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said it would be “very unwise” for European governments to retaliate.

    “I think it’s a complete canard that the president will be doing this because of the Nobel prize. The president is looking at Greenland as a strategic asset for the United States,” he told reporters in Davos.

    EU leaders will discuss their options at an emergency summit in Brussels on Thursday. One option is a package of tariffs on 93 billion euros ($108 billion) of U.S. imports that could automatically kick in on February 6 after a six-month suspension.

    Another option is the “Anti-Coercion Instrument” (ACI), which has never yet been used and which could limit access to public tenders, investments or banking activity or restrict trade in services, in which the U.S. has a surplus with the bloc, including in digital services.

    The EU said it was continuing to engage “at all levels” with the U.S. but said the use of its ACI was not off the table.

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer called for calm discussion between the allies, adding that he did not believe Trump was considering military action to seize Greenland.

    Russia declined to comment on whether the U.S. designs on Greenland were good or bad but said it was hard to disagree with experts that Trump would “go down in… world history” if he did take control of the island.

  • Europe, Greenland and Trump

    Europe, Greenland and Trump

    Since his assumption of office in January last year, the unrelenting United States (US) president Donald Trump has continued to insist on annexing Greenland, an autonomous Arctic territory under Denmark, the hard way or easy way. He absolves himself of the huge responsibility of taking the right decision on a matter that exemplifies his personal greed rather than US national security interest. Just when it seemed his interest had waned, it resurfaced even more virulently. He justifies his hard line position by citing competing and countervailing Chinese and Russian interests in the Arctic and minerals-rich territory.

    Mr Trump did not say how many territories he would take if competing great powers showed some interest. Was anyone competing for Canada when he desired to make that country the 51st US state? And would he have shown interest in Venezuela had that country been arid, poor and ridden with problems and disease, like Haiti for instance? And what of Mexico, over which he has shown no interest in making the US’s 52nd state? Why, of course, it is Hispanic, and that race of people war against his racist inclination. But over Greenland, he will likely come a cropper. European countries in NATO have signaled that any attempt to forcibly possess Greenland would spell the end of the Atlantic alliance. Regardless, the US president has sworn to punish with tariffs anyone who stands in the way of Greenland annexation.

    Read Also: Trump as Europe’s nemesis

    Unsure that Mr Trump is not as hard of hearing as he is greedy and megalomaniacal, European NATO members have begun to take tentative steps to back their commitments to Denmark and Greenland with action. Germany and France have sent military teams to Greenland to look at all probabilities and possibilities, including preparing grounds for military deployments. After interacting with Mr Trump for a few years and seeing how mean, intransigent and incorrigible he is, they have probably begun to realise that the only way to stop a bully is to stand up to him, not yield inches and yards. In other words, Mr Trump will have to determine whether to fight Europe over Greenland or shelve the greed that has defined much of his adult life.

  • Bad times for bandits as Trump’s example catches on

    Bad times for bandits as Trump’s example catches on

    These, surely, are not the best of times for bandits, terrorists and other heartless anti-social elements who for years have made life unbearable for innocent Nigerians in Borno, Yobe, Katsina, Adamawa, Niger, Benue, Kogi, Kwara and other parts of the country. Their cup is full and the security agencies, aided by unprecedented support from America, are poised to return their ‘favours’ in the same measure as they had dished out to hapless citizens. They gave no quarter in the execution of their evil agenda and would get none from the military.

    From Sokoto and Niger to Kogi and Kwara states, the marauding beasts are finally feeling the heat. Their camps are in disarray from ground and air offensives launched by security agents. If the age-long submission of famous physicist Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion was previously lost on them, they must by now have embraced the reality that every action must necessarily provoke an equal and opposite reaction.

    In the perspective of a patriot, the optics from the nation’s security situation in recent weeks can hardly be more gratifying. It all began with American President Donald Trump’s famous social media post in which he threatened that American forces would invade Nigeria “gun-a-blazing” to end what he called genocide against the Christian population. While the debate raged on his flawed claim that only Christians were being killed by terrorists and bandits, the American President made good his threat in the night of December 25 last year with the launch of precision strikes on terrorist camps in Sokoto State. The American President would later announce the gesture as his Christmas gift to bandits who a few days earlier had vowed to make Christmas a moment of grief for the hapless Christian population.

    Trump’s action became a shot in the arm for the nation’s security agents who have since taken the fight to the terrorists in their enclaves in Borno, Kogi, Kwara, Niger and elsewhere. In Kogi State, for instance, the residents could heave a sigh of relief for the first time in many months after a recent invasion of some forests in the state where Ayere and Obajana, two previously obscure communities, suddenly became household names on account of their notoriety as hotspots for kidnapping. The two communities, which are gateways between the northern and southern parts of the country, had become nightmares for travellers.

    READ ALSO: How to budget for 2026

    A day hardly passed without a heart-rending story of commuters waylaid by dare-devil bandits who goaded them into the bush and subjected them to untold torture while also demanding as ransoms from their anxious relations sums huge enough to build a modern stadium. In a particularly pathetic instance, the bandits abducted a nursing mother from a passenger bus on her way from Lagos to Abuja, forcing her to leave her teething baby in the commercial bus they were travelling while they marched her and other travellers into the bush.

    The foregoing considered, it is difficult not to be excited by the will Kogi State Governor Ahmed Ododo has demonstrated in the fight against banditry in the state. Announcing government’s breakthrough in a press statement, the Kogi State Commissioner for Information and Communication, Hon. Kingsley Fanwo, attributed the success of the sustained war against banditry and terrorism in the state to series of highly successful precision operations carried out by coordinated joint security forces including the Nigeria Army, the Nigerian Navy, the Nigerian Air Force, the Department of State Services (DSS) and the National Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) with support from the Nigeria Police Force.

    He said: “The coordinated strikes and ground battle led to the destruction of several bandits’ camps, the dismantling of their criminal networks and the neutralization of many criminals with several others sustaining varying degrees of injuries. Initial feedback from affected communities has shown renewed confidence in the capacity and commitment of our security forces to decisively end banditry and kidnapping, not only in Kogi State but across the country.”

    Besides Kogi, there have been reports of precision air interdiction operations in Zamfara State, striking Turba Hill and Kachala Dogo Sule’s camp in Tsafe Local Government Area, which, according to the Director of Public Relations and Information of NAF, Air Commodore Ehimen Ejodame, engaged multiple active structures, “triggering intense fires that destroyed bandits’ facilities, neutralized many of them and crippled the group’s IED production and deployment capacity. In Sokoto, troops of the Lakurawa terrorist group are being forced to migrate towards Niger Republic as the heat from air strikes becomes unbearable.

    Unfortunately the security agents have not only the bandits and terrorists to contend with but also the army of cynics who see nothing in the successes being recorded against the anti-social elements. The cynical reactions, especially on the social media, are such that leave one wondering who their authors are supporting between terrorists and the nation. In extreme cases, many of them serve as informants to bandits and even supplied food, fuel and weapons to them in their hideouts. Even the traditional media is complicit in many cases. They gleefully report every incident of killing or kidnapping by terrorists but look away when security agents turn the table.

    But whether they like it or not, Nigeria is winning the war against banditry and terrorism. Only last week, Nigeria took delivery of new weapons from America; a reassuring development after Trump’s pledge to work with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for an end to the dare-devil groups.

  • Trump’s epiphany

    Trump’s epiphany

    United States President Donald Trump is strongly opinionated, verging on bigotry. He is hardline in perspective and makes no apologies about his dispositions that contradict other people’s realities. And so, when he shifts ground – even if grudgingly so – it is a noteworthy recalibration of his worldview.

    For the first time since the American leader took interest in the challenge of insecurity in Nigeria, he recently conceded that Muslims are also victims of killings by bandits. Contrary to the reality on ground, he had repeatedly claimed that Christians were being targeted with genocidal attacks. Following his designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, he threatened to deploy US troops to the country, saying they would come in “guns-a-blazing to wipe out the terrorists killing our cherished Christians” amid repeated claims by some US politicians that Christians are subjected to systematic persecution in Nigeria.

    The Nigerian government and many Nigerians rebutted the allegations that Christians were being targeted for killing. Bandits have operated more virulently in the northern areas of the country where Moslems happen to predominate, and they attack their targets indiscriminately and without premeditation based on religious affiliation or ethnic consideration. The point Nigeria has strained to get across is that the challenge of insecurity in the country is cross-cutting and requires a sweeping counteraction, not selective remedying as Washington wanted to make it.

    Read Also: Atiku’s son defects to APC, vows to mobilise for Tinubu’s re-election

    Trump had seemed impervious to Nigeria’s argument, even though his administration struck a working pact with the Nigerian government to hit at terrorist hideouts. On Christmas Day 2025, US forces launched missile strikes against Islamic State (IS) militants in northwest Nigeria in a “joint operation” with the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    In an interview with the New York Times published on the newspaper’s website last week, the American leader was asked whether the missile strikes against the IS signalled the start of a wider military campaign, to which he responded that his country could launch additional military strikes in Nigeria if attacks on Christians persists. “I’d love to make it a one-time strike,” he said, adding: “But if they continue to kill Christians it will be a many-time strike.”

    In October, Trump’s senior adviser for Arab and African affairs, Massad Boulos, said extremist groups such as Boko Haram and IS were killing more Muslims than Christians in Nigeria. Asked about his adviser’s remarks, Trump responded: “I think that Muslims are being killed also in Nigeria. But it’s mostly Christians.”

    The American leader need be advised to face up fully to expert information about Nigeria’s reality from within his own orbit. Accepting that reality will not in any way demean the value of his country’s assistance to curtail Nigeria’s insecurity challenge. Rather, discounting the reality with bigoted inaccuracy complicates the motive for the assistance and detracts from its worth.