Tag: Trump

  • Trump tells Iranian protesters ‘help is on the way’

    Trump tells Iranian protesters ‘help is on the way’

    • EU leaders threaten tougher sanctions on Tehran

    President Donald Trump called on Iranians to keep protesting and promised “help is on its way”  yesterday, a sign that he may soon authorise U.S. military strikes against the country’s leadership.

    “Iranian Patriots, keep protesting – take over institutions!!!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters stops. Help is on the way.”

    Trump has repeatedly threatened military action against Iran if the country’s leadership continues to crack down on protests.

    Demonstrations began two weeks ago in Tehran’s bazaars over rampant inflation, but have since spiralled into wider protests across the country against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his regime, which has ruled the country since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

    Read Also: Tinubu targets $30b green finance toboost electricity access

    An internet blackout across the country has prevented effective communication with the outside world, but some estimates of the death toll from the crackdown have reached thousands.

    A volunteer group of analysts, working from Tehran hospital reports, told TIME the death toll nationwide could be as high as 6,000. Images smuggled out of the country showed a Tehran-area morgue packed with hundreds of bodies from Thursday night alone.

    Over the weekend, Trump was reportedly briefed on a number of military options to strike Iran, but had not yet made a final decision.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a close ally of Trump who has been influential in shaping his policy on Iran, shared his prediction on what an attack on Iran might look like.

    “No boots on the ground, but unleashing holy hell — as he promised — on the regime that has trampled every red line. A massive wave of military, cyber and psychological attacks is the meat and bones of ‘help is on the way’,” he wrote on X.

    “What am I looking for? Destroy the infrastructure that allows the massacre and slaughter of the Iranian people, and take down the leaders responsible for the killing,” he added.

    Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, warned on Sunday that both Israel and “all American military centers, bases and ships in the region will be our legitimate targets” in the event of an attack.

    “We do not consider ourselves limited to reacting after the action and will act based on any objective signs of a threat,” he added.

    Also yesterday, the European Union said it is drafting new sanctions against Tehran as the death toll continues to rise from a crackdown on anti-government protests throughout Iran.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen yesterday said the number of casualties was “horrifying.”

    “I unequivocally condemn the excessive use of force and continued restrictions of freedom,” she said on X.

    According to Iran Human Rights, an Oslo, Norway-based advocacy group, at least 648 protesters, including nine children under age 18, have been killed by government security officials in Iran since the protests began more than two weeks ago.

    “The European Union has already listed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in its entirety under its human rights sanctions regime,” Ms. von der Leyen said. “Further sanctions on those responsible for the repression will be swiftly proposed.”

    She didn’t specify what additional restrictions could be imposed on the Islamic Republic. The EU has already placed arms embargoes, oil and entry trading bans, and financial constraints.

    European Commission Vice President Kaja Kallas, a former prime minister of Estonia, said Iranians are fighting for their future against a repressive regime in Tehran.

    “Images from Tehran reveal a disproportionate and heavy-handed response by the security forces,” Ms. Kallas said this week on X. “Any violence against peaceful demonstrations is unacceptable.”

    Trump’s message comes just over a week after the U.S. military removed Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro from power. The U.S. continues to mass an unusually large number of troops in the Caribbean Sea.

  • Trump says nations doing business with Iran face 25% tariff on U.S. trade

    Trump says nations doing business with Iran face 25% tariff on U.S. trade

    President Donald Trump said any country doing business with Iran would face a tariff rate of 25 per cent on any trade with the U.S..

    Trump’s threat is coming as Washington weighs a response to the situation in Iran which is seeing its biggest anti-government protests in years.

    “Effective immediately, any Country doing business with the Islamic Republic of Iran will pay a Tariff of 25 per cent on any and all business being done with the United States of America,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

    Tariffs are paid by U.S. importers of goods from those countries.

    Iran, a member of the OPEC oil producing group, has been heavily sanctioned by Washington for years.

    It exports much of its oil to China, with Turkey, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, and India among its other top trading partners.

    “This Order is final and conclusive,” Trump said without providing any further detail.

    There was no official documentation from the White House of the policy on its website, nor information about the legal authority Trump would use to impose the tariffs, or whether they would be aimed at all of Iran’s trading partners.

    The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

    The Chinese embassy in Washington criticised Trump’s approach, saying China will take “all necessary measures” to safeguard its interests and opposed “any illicit unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction.”

    “China’s position against the indiscriminate imposition of tariffs is consistent and clear.

    ”Tariff wars and trade wars have no winners. Coercion and pressure cannot solve problems,” a spokesperson of the Chinese embassy in Washington said on X.

    Japan and South Korea, which agreed on trade deals with the U.S. last year, said on Tuesday they are closely monitoring the development.

    “We … plan to take any necessary measures once the specific actions of the U.S. government become clear,” South Korea’s trade ministry said in a statement.

    Japan’s Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Masanao Ozaki told reporters that Tokyo will “carefully examine the specific content of any measures as they become clear, as well as their potential impact on Japan, and will respond appropriately.”

    Iran, which had a 12-day war with U.S. ally, Israel last year and whose nuclear facilities the U.S. military bombed in June, is seeing its biggest anti-government demonstrations in years.

    Trump has said the U.S. may meet Iranian officials and that he was in contact with Iran’s opposition, while piling pressure on its leaders, including threatening military action.

    Tehran said on Monday it was keeping communication channels with Washington open as Trump considered how to respond to the situation in Iran, which has posed one of the gravest tests of clerical rule in the country since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

    Demonstrations evolved from complaints about dire economic hardships to defiant calls for the fall of the deeply entrenched clerical establishment.

    U.S.-based rights group, HRANA, said it had verified the deaths of 599 people – 510 protesters and 89 security personnel – since the protests began on December 28.

    While air strikes were one of many alternatives open to Trump, “diplomacy is always the first option for the president,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday.

    During the course of his second term in office, Trump has often threatened and imposed tariffs on other countries over their ties with U.S. adversaries and over trade policies that he has described as unfair to Washington.

    Trump’s trade policy is under legal pressure as the U.S. Supreme Court is considering striking down a broad swathe of Trump’s existing tariffs.

    Iran exported products to 147 trading partners in 2022, according to World Bank’s most recent data. (Reuters/NAN)

  • Trump govt revokes over 100,000 visas amid crackdown on immigrants

    Trump govt revokes over 100,000 visas amid crackdown on immigrants

    The United States revoked the visas of more than 100,000 foreign nationals last year, the State Department said yesterday.

    This came to light as the Trump administration continues to enforce stricter immigration curbs.

    The U.S. has been actively revoking visas for Nigerians and other nationals under the Trump administration, citing national security and criminal concerns like DUI, assault, and theft, with reports of thousands affected, including professionals and students, often without detailed explanation, creating significant disruption.

    DUI means Driving Under the Influence, a crime for operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol or drugs, leading to penalties like fines, license suspension, and jail time, with related terms like DWI (Driving While Intoxicated) and OWI (Operating While Intoxicated) used in different places for the same offence.

    It applies to alcohol, prescription meds, or other impairing substances, and even minor impairment can result in a charge.

    This intensified scrutiny is part of a broader policy to curb immigration and enforce stricter vetting, impacting various visa types and leading to concerns about transparency and due process,

    “In less than one year, the State Department revoked over 100,000 visas from foreign nationals, marking a new record and more than a 150% increase in revocations since 2024,” deputy spokesman Tommy Pigott said in an emailed statement.

    He added that the revocations included thousands of foreign nationals charged or convicted of crimes, including assault, theft, and driving under the influence.

    Read Also: How Funke Akindele made over N6bn at Nigerian box office in five years

    “The State Department’s recently launched Continuous Vetting Centre works to ensure that all foreign nationals on American soil comply with our laws — and that the visas of those who pose a threat to American citizens are swiftly revoked,” Pigott said.

    “The Trump administration will continue to put America first and protect our nation from foreign nationals who pose a risk to public safety or national security,” he added.

    The statement came amid the administration’s broader crackdown on immigrants, which has extended to international students and activists critical of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. Legal challenges have pushed back against these actions.

    Turkish PhD student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested on the street by plainclothes ICE agents after co-authoring an op-ed on Gaza, was later released from ICE detention, and a federal judge restored her student record in December.

    Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful U.S. resident and pro-Palestinian activist at Columbia University, was also released and has legally challenged the revocation of his visa.

  • Cuba defiant after Trump says island to receive no more Venezuelan oil, money

    Cuba defiant after Trump says island to receive no more Venezuelan oil, money

    UNITED States (U.S.) President Donald Trump on Sunday said no more Venezuelan oil or money will go to Cuba and suggested the Communist-run island should strike a deal with Washington, ramping up pressure on the long-time U.S. nemesis and provoking defiant words from the island’s leadership.

    Venezuela is Cuba’s biggest oil supplier, but no cargoes have departed from Venezuelan ports to the Caribbean country since the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by US forces in early January amid a strict US oil blockade on the OPEC country, shipping data shows.

    Meanwhile, Caracas and Washington are progressing on a US$2 billion (S$2.57 billion) deal to supply up to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil to the US with proceeds to be deposited in US Treasury-supervised accounts, a major test of the emerging relationship between Trump and interim President Delcy Rodriguez.

    “There will be no more oil or money going to Cuba –Zero! I strongly suggest they make a deal, before it is too late,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Sunday.

    “Cuba lived, for many years, on large amounts of oil and money from Venezuela,” Trump added.

    Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel rejected Trump’s threat on social media, suggesting the US had no moral authority to force a deal on Cuba.

    “Cuba is a free, independent, and sovereign nation. Nobody dictates what we do,” Diaz-Canel said on X. “Cuba does not attack; it has been attacked by the US for 66 years, and it does not threaten; it prepares, ready to defend the homeland to the last drop of blood.”

    Read Also: Nigeria produces 18.12mb/d in 11 months, says NUPRC 

    The U.S. president did not elaborate on his suggested deal.

    But Trump’s push on Cuba represents the latest escalation in his move to bring regional powers in line with the United States and underscores the seriousness of the administration’s ambition to dominate the Western Hemisphere.

    Trump’s top officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have made no secret of their expectation that the recent US intervention in Venezuela could push Cuba over the edge.

    US officials have hardened their rhetoric against Cuba in recent weeks, though the two countries have been at odds since former leader Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution.

    Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez said in another post on X on Sunday that Cuba had the right to import fuel from any suppliers willing to export it. He also denied that Cuba had received financial or other “material” compensation in return for security services provided to any country.

    Thirty-two members of Cuba’s armed forces and intelligence services were killed during the US raid on Venezuela. Cuba said those killed were responsible for “security and defence” but did not provide details on the arrangement between the two long-time allies.

  • Still on Nigeria’s re-designation as ‘country of particular concern’

    Still on Nigeria’s re-designation as ‘country of particular concern’

    • By Hafiz Bakare

    In October 2025, the re-designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) by the Trump administration sparked significant debate regarding its tone and intent.

    Nigeria and the United States subsequently found common ground to collaborate on the airstrike which took place on Christmas Day 2025. This collaboration was a direct result of diplomatic engagement that followed significant Nigerian and international reservations about President Donald Trump’s initial communication, which many saw as threatening and misinformed.

    The primary reservations regarding President Trump’s communication re-designating Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) on October 31, 2025, focused on its *inappropriate tone, selective framing of the security crisis as purely religious persecution, and a perceived threat to Nigerian sovereignty.

    The Nigerian government, led by President Bola Tinubu, strongly refuted the U.S. characterization that Christianity faced an “existential threat,” stating it did not reflect the country’s reality or values. Officials stressed that violence affected citizens of all faiths, including Muslims, and was tied to broader issues like terrorism, resource conflicts, and governance challenges.

    Read Also: Raising financial services standards with consumer awareness, protection

    Many Nigerians, including ethnic organizations and diplomats, viewed Trump’s subsequent threat of potential U.S. military intervention (“guns-a-blazing”) as an insult to national sovereignty and a dangerous oversimplification that could exacerbate sectarian tensions.

    Nigeria’s initial, more assertive diplomatic response was soon replaced with a toned-down version to de-escalate tensions, highlighting internal government deliberation on how to manage the diplomatic friction.

    Analysts and some U.S. lawmakers argued that framing Nigeria’s complex security landscape in narrow religious terms was counterproductive and detracted from the wider problem of tackling jihadist violence and widespread insecurity affecting everyone.

    Trump’s rhetoric, including threats to enter the country “guns-a-blazing” and instructions to the “Department of War” to prepare for action, was seen as inflammatory and a violation of diplomatic decorum.

    Some observers viewed the move as an attempt to appeal to Trump’s domestic religious base in the U.S. rather than a nuanced foreign policy effort.

    A visiting bipartisan delegation of U.S. Congress members later clarified that the CPC designation was intended to foster reforms through dialogue and partnership, not military force, dismissing any plans for U.S. troops on the ground.

    Experts urged the U.S. to use its leverage to pursue a broader, more nuanced approach to religious freedom that acknowledged Nigeria’s complex, multi-layered crises rather than a single-issue focus.

    The two countries did find common ground, leading to a collaborative operation. The U.S. airstrikes on December 25, 2025, targeting ISIS in Sokoto State, were conducted in coordination with and with the approval of Nigerian authorities.

    Nigerian Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar confirmed that President Tinubu gave the “go ahead” for the operation after discussions with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and the Nigerian government officially described it as a “collaborative effort” and “precision strike operation”. Nigeria provided intelligence and strategic coordination, while U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) carried out the kinetic action at the request of the Nigerian government.

    While collaboration was confirmed, a slight divergence remained in the public framing. President Trump’s statements emphasized targeting those “persecuting Christians”, while Nigerian officials stressed the operation was about general counterterrorism and ensuring the safety of all innocent civilians, irrespective of religion.

    Yes, the initial reservations have been addressed to a reasonable extent through ongoing dialogue and practical security cooperation. The shift from Trump’s initial threats of unilateral military action to a coordinated operation with Nigerian consent indicates successful diplomatic de-escalation.

    Following a high-level meeting in Washington, D.C., in November 2025, both nations agreed to a non-binding cooperation framework and the creation of a Joint Working Group to unify their approach to counter-terrorism and civilian protection.

    Since late November 2025, the U.S. has conducted daily intelligence-gathering flights over Nigeria using contractor-operated aircraft to monitor militant movements and support Nigerian tactical operations.

    High-level engagement and bipartisan congressional visits have helped clarify the U.S. intent as partnership and capacity-building rather than “punishment” or “invasion”.

    The incident has spurred more concrete actions from the Nigerian government, including a declaration of a nationwide security emergency and planned recruitment of more police officers, demonstrating a commitment to addressing security concerns internally.

    In November 2025, Nigeria unveiled its National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC) Strategic Plan 2025–2030, which prioritizes bilateral cooperation with the U.S. to enhance intelligence analysis and modernize Nigeria’s security architecture.

    However, a few Nigerians still have sovereignty concerns despite the collaboration while the fundamental disagreement over whether the violence constitutes “religious persecution” or “regional insecurity” persists, with the U.S. administration and Nigerian government continuing to use different language to describe the same conflict.

    Overall, both nations ultimately chose pragmatism, leveraging the moment of diplomatic tension to reinforce their shared interest in counterterrorism, ensuring the bilateral relationship remains a strong, albeit complicated, partnership.

    •Bakare is a consultant and a former bank chief executive.

  • Trump becomes bull in a China shop

    Trump becomes bull in a China shop

    Two contrasting theories have been advanced to explain United States president Donald Trump’s greed for foreign lands and resources. One, that his rapaciousness accords with his private and natural inclination for coveting other peoples properties. Alarmingly for the rest of the world, this greed sits very well with America’s historical fundamentals that saw their founding fathers seize and expropriate native Indian and Mexican lands. For both the US and Mr Trump, eyeing, co-opting and seizing other people’s resources have become an existential necessity. Mr Trump knows no other way of existence than to plunder and pillage, while explaining that malfeasance away as a display of strength in a world populated by weak, undeserving and expendable people. His private business is a litany of plunder, and his personal life an exemplification of cruelty and unscrupulousness. It, therefore, gives him immense pleasure to now sit atop the American throne and project that greed around the world, receiving plane gifts here, signing private and national contracts there, and attempting to buy or coerce lands in Greenland or elsewhere for the US.

    A second explanation relates to what some experts have described as the strategic projection of America’s national security interest. America now has a president totally averse to democracy and one who has not once enunciated any lofty ideal of democracy. Seizing Venezuelan oil, dispensing with that country’s controversial and repressive leader Nicolas Maduro, and exerting total and long-term control over the world’s largest deposit of crude oil is said to be a ploy to weaken China, neutralise Russia and Iran, and determine the price of oil. But China is transiting to clean energy at a bewildering rate, buying over 11 million electric vehicles of the 18.5m sold globally, at a time when the US is fixated on oil production at home and engaged in costly military adventures for oil abroad. Years ago, former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez had explained American hostility to his country as inspired by the desire to control Venezuelan oil. While that desire has finally been accomplished, and regardless of the pacification of Venezuela’s weak, colluding and greedy elite, no one can accurately what the long-term consequences would be.

    Many European countries have equivocated on the US attack on Venezuela, blaming the victim for its domestic antidemocratic practices, repression of the opposition, and rigged elections. But nothing really justifies US outlawry, for as it has become immediately obvious, Mr Trump who ordered the attack on Caracas had no interest whatsoever in democracy, fair elections or the rule of law. He knew what he wanted, and he had the boldness and defiance to go for it. In 1938 and 1939, much of Europe also condoned the adventurism of Adolf Hitler whose policy of Germany’s living space or Lebensraum took the continent apart and sucked the world into a devastating maelstrom. The predictable end was a war that led to the death of an estimated 50-80 million people, nearly half of whom were civilians. The world sees a disturbing parallel between Mr Trump and Hitler, but it is unclear how a vacillating Europe, which has also been bullied and derided by the American president, sees him. The US president expresses the fear that he might be impeached should his unpopular policies lead to the Republicans losing the midterm elections. In other words, he is already signaling that the ossification of US political divisions could be exploited to thwart democratic change.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Nigeria advance to AFCON semifinals, beat Algeria 2-0

    The world order has been destroyed, as this column concluded last week, but eventually the US will face resistance, and from resistance will flow alliances that will inevitably trigger another major conflagration. Great war is the natural outcome of the destruction of world order, a cyclical inevitability to redefine, reorder and impose a new global order, whether it has the capacity to last or not. For now, the US has lost virtually all its friends as well as global respect, accompanied by the even heftier losses of democratic ideals and cultural imperialism it had projected for decades. Mr Trump’s first term was viewed as an aberration. His second term, not to say his domestic popularity that is underscored by racism, has cemented the view of America as an imperialist bully, a danger to world peace for its scores of sponsored terrorism against many countries, and completely destitute of the principles and ideals it had sold the world. Might had always been right, as history shows, but that might remained right only until a mightier force came along. From the Assyrians to the Babylonians, and on to the Chaldeans, and then the Greeks and Romans, it is a long, bloody history of one empire usurping another.

    The world is not about to shed its toga and change its trajectory. As contemporary history shows, particularly as exampled by the despairing responses of France’s Emmanuel Macron to the US provocation, Britain’s keir Starmer’s, and Kemi Badenoch’s feeble twaddle over the morality of the attack, there are few brilliant and perceptive leaders left anywhere. Great leaders were not always in abundant supply even before now; but the scarcity is now so sever and punishing that the world must blanch with horror at the ubiquitousness of mediocre leadership. The US president has shown that the world is clearly more endangered by visionless and incompetent leadership than by the challenges nations relentlessly face, whether economic, social or political.

  • Trump warns of more US airstrikes on Nigeria

    Trump warns of more US airstrikes on Nigeria

    US President Donald Trump has cautioned that he may authorise further airstrikes in Nigeria if the ongoing killings in the country continue.

    The warning follows the United States’ Christmas Day strikes on two camps operated by Lakurawa, a jihadist group active in Sokoto State, near the border with Niger. 

    Neither the US nor the Nigerian government has released casualty figures, and no further details have been provided on the impact of the operation.

    In an interview with the New York Times, Trump suggested that additional military action remains on the table.

    Read Also: Trump announces cancellation of second wave of attacks on Venezuela

    “I’d love to make it a one-time strike. But if they continue to kill Christians, it will be a many-time strike,” he said.

    While the Nigerian government has consistently rejected claims that it is failing to protect Christian communities from jihadist violence, it has pledged to work with the US and other allies to address the country’s security challenges.

  • Trump announces cancellation of second wave of attacks on Venezuela

    Trump announces cancellation of second wave of attacks on Venezuela

    President Donald Trump said on Friday that he had cancelled a “previously expected” second wave of military attacks on Venezuela, attributing the decision to the country’s cooperation with the United States. 

    The announcement comes nearly a week after he ordered a military operation to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who is now in U.S. custody in New York along with his wife, Cilia Flores, facing federal charges. 

    Shortly after that initial action, Trump stated at a news conference that the United States was prepared to launch a second, larger attack if necessary. 

    He acknowledged at the time that such an escalation was assumed, but suggested on Friday that it may no longer be required. 

    In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the United States and Venezuela were “working well together, especially as it pertains to rebuilding, in a much bigger, better, and more modern form, their oil and gas infrastructure.” 

    “Because of this cooperation, I have cancelled the previously expected second wave of attacks, which looks like it will not be needed. However, all ships will stay in place for safety and security purposes,” he added. 

    Trump further said Venezuela was releasing “large numbers of political prisoners as a sign of ‘seeking peace,’” describing the gesture as important and strategic in easing tensions. 

    The Venezuelan government began releasing high-profile prisoners on Thursday, including opposition figures, characterising the action as part of efforts to pursue peace and cooperation. 

    Read Also: Trump warns of more US airstrikes on Nigeria

    U.S. officials previously told lawmakers that, in exchange for de-escalation, the interim government in Caracas was expected to free detained political figures as part of broader discussions following the military operation. 

    Following the initial ousting of Maduro, Trump had indicated that the U.S. would effectively “run” Venezuela, suggesting a prolonged involvement. When asked how long such control might persist, he said it could extend “much longer.” 

    The president also has not ruled out longer-term military involvement and has said his administration will soon expand actions targeting drug cartels on land after months of maritime strikes. 

    Trump announced plans to meet with executives from major oil companies at the White House on Friday to encourage increased Venezuelan oil output and new investments. 

    He claimed in his Truth Social post that “at least 100 billion dollars will be invested by BIG OIL,” although industry representatives have expressed skepticism about committing such substantial capital to the country’s energy infrastructure. 

    Senior Trump administration officials, including Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have outlined an ambitious strategy for Venezuela’s oil sector that would involve significant U.S. influence and no definitive timeline for success. 

    Separately, the U.S. Senate advanced a bipartisan resolution on Thursday to limit future military engagements in Venezuela without congressional approval, marking a symbolic rebuke to Trump’s actions. 

    The measure, supported by a coalition of Democrats and Republicans, is expected to pass next week. 

  • Trump’s oil push widens with seizure of Russian-flagged tanker linked to Venezuela

    Trump’s oil push widens with seizure of Russian-flagged tanker linked to Venezuela

    The U.S. seized an empty Russian-flagged, Venezuela-linked oil tanker in the Atlantic Ocean yesterday as part of President Donald Trump’s aggressive push to dictate oil flows in the Americas and force Venezuela’s socialist government to become an ally.

    Trump said Tuesday that Venezuela will hand over tens of millions of barrels of oil to the United States, just days after a U.S. raid toppled the country’s anti-American president, leaving a more cooperative leader in charge.

    Trump said 30–50 million barrels of “high‑quality, sanctioned” Venezuelan crude will be shipped to US ports, with the revenue — perhaps more than $2 billion at current market prices — placed under his personal control.

    It was not immediately clear whether Venezuela’s new ruler — interim president Delcy Rodriguez — had agreed to hand over the oil, how the plan would work, or what its legal basis would be.

    If confirmed, it would be the first major sign that Venezuela’s new leader and her military-backed government were willing to meet an extraordinary set of US demands.

    Venezuelan authorities did not immediately respond to request for comment.

    After capturing Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in an attack on Caracas on Saturday, the U.S. is continuing to blockade vessels under sanctions off the South American country, a member of the OPEC oil group.

    Read Also: DisCos raked in N570b in Q3, install 228,614 meters

    The U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. military Special Forces apprehended the Marinera tanker, which had refused to be boarded last month and had switched to Russia’s flag, officials said.

    The U.S. operation was supported by Britain’s Royal Air Force and one of its military vessels, which British Defence Secretary John Healey said was part of “global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.”

    With a Russian submarine and vessels nearby after a two-week pursuit in the Atlantic, the move risked more confrontation with Russia, which has condemned U.S. actions over Venezuela and is already at odds with the West due to the war in Ukraine.

    Russian state broadcaster RT showed an image of a helicopter hovering near the Marinera, originally known as the Bella-1, as U.S. forces began boarding the U.S.-sanctioned tanker. It was empty, but Washington says it has been used to transport sanctioned Venezuelan oil.

    The U.S. Coast Guard also intercepted a tanker carrying Venezuelan oil, the Panama-flagged M Sophia, near the northeast coast of South America, the U.S. officials said, in the fourth seizure in recent weeks. The tanker was fully loaded, according to records of state oil company PDVSA.

    “The only maritime energy transport allowed will be that consistent with American law and national security,” Stephen Miller, deputy White House chief of staff, said in a statement on social media. “There is unlimited economic potential for the Venezuelan energy sector through legitimate and authorised commercial avenues established by the United States.”

    Trump’s administration was also pressing a deal with Venezuela to divert supplies intended for China, Venezuela’s top buyer, and import up to $2 billion worth of crude oil.

    “The United States’ brazen use of force against Venezuela and its demand for ‘America First’ when Venezuela disposes of its own oil resources are typical acts of bullying,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said at a press conference.

    Trump has openly spoken of controlling Venezuela’s vast oil reserves, in conjunction with U.S. oil companies, after arresting and jailing Maduro, whom he has cast as a drug-trafficking dictator in league with Washington’s foes. Maduro pleaded not guilty this week to drug crimes in a federal court in New York.

    Maduro’s Socialist Party allies remain in power in Venezuela, where Acting President Delcy Rodriguez is treading a fine line between denouncing his “kidnapping” and kick-starting cooperation with the U.S. under explicit threats from Trump.

    The Republican president said the U.S. would refine and sell up to 50 million barrels of crude stuck in Venezuela under a U.S. blockade as a first step in his plan to revive a sector long in decline despite sitting on the largest reserves in the world.

    “This Oil will be sold at its Market Price, and that money will be controlled by me, as President of the United States of America, to ensure it is used to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States!” Trump posted on Tuesday.

    Sources at PDVSA told Reuters negotiations for an export deal had progressed, though Venezuela’s government made no official announcement.

    Crude oil prices fell on world markets due to anticipated increased supplies released by Trump’s plan.

    China, Russia and leftist allies of Venezuela have all denounced the U.S. raid to capture Maduro, which was Washington’s biggest such intervention in Latin America since the 1989 invasion of Panama to topple Manuel Noriega.

    Washington’s allies are also deeply uneasy at the extraordinary and precedent of seizing a foreign head of state, with Trump making a slew of threats of more action – from Mexico to Greenland – to further U.S. interests.

    Venezuela has not confirmed its total losses from the attack on Caracas. The army posted a list of 23 of its dead and ally Cuba said 32 members of its military and intelligence services died.

    Maduro, 63, who had ruled Venezuela since the 2013 death of his predecessor and mentor Hugo Chavez, pleaded not guilty on Monday to narcotics charges in a Manhattan court where he was shackled at the ankles and wore orange-and-beige prison garb.

    Trump appears to be calculating that it is better for stability in Venezuela to work with Maduro’s senior allies for now. He is stressing revival of the oil sector with the help of U.S. firms as the priority, not the freeing of political prisoners or a new vote for a democratic transition.

    Venezuela’s main anti-Maduro figure Maria Corina Machado, who left in disguise to pick up the Nobel Peace Prize in October, wants to return home where she says the opposition would easily win a free vote.

    But she is also taking care not to antagonise Trump, saying she would like to personally give him the Nobel Prize, which he had coveted and which she dedicated to him at the time. She backs Trump’s desire to make Venezuela a major ally and the energy hub of the Americas.

    While working with Rodriguez and other top Venezuelan officials, the U.S. has warned they must cooperate or risk sharing Maduro’s fate.

  • China slams Trump’s plan to control Venezuela’s oil as illegal move

    China slams Trump’s plan to control Venezuela’s oil as illegal move

    China on Wednesday sharply criticised U.S. President Donald Trump’s planned intervention in Venezuela’s oil industry.

    The “outrageous use of force against Venezuela” by the United States and the demand that the country should manage its oil resources according to the “America first” principle constitute harassment, violate international law, and harm the rights of the Venezuelan people, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said.

    Venezuela has full sovereignty over its mineral resources and economic activities, Mao continued, stressing that China’s rights and interests in the country must also be protected.

    China is a key ally of Venezuela and the largest buyer of the South American country’s oil.

    Read Also: Trump not planning to occupy or nation-build in Venezuela – Republican U.S. lawmakers

    In a post on his Truth Social platform on Tuesday, Trump said Venezuela’s interim government would hand over between 30 million and 50 million barrels of “sanctioned oil” to the U.S.

    The U.S. president said he would control the proceeds to ensure they were used “to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States.”

    The U.S. attacked targets in Venezuela on Saturday, seizing authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores over alleged drug offences and removing them from the country.

    After the operation, Trump said that the U.S. would temporarily run Venezuela.

    The U.S. president had previously highlighted the economic potential of the country’s oil industry, stating that major U.S. oil companies would invest in repairing infrastructure and developing production.

    (dpa/NAN)