Tag: VAT

  • South Africa raises VAT for first time in 25 years

    South Africa’s new leadership has announced it was taking the politically risky step of raising value-added tax (VAT) for the first time in 25 years to cut the deficit and stabilise debt under new President Cyril Ramaphosa.

    The government of Africa’s most industrialised country has to plug a revenue hole in its budget and repair its economy after nine years of mismanagement under the scandal-plagued Jacob Zuma.

    The move to raise VAT to 15 per cent from 14 starting in April is expected to generate more 23 billion rand ($2 billion) of revenue in 2018/19.

    But with the VAT rate unchanged since 1993 the move was likely to prove unpopular ahead of a national election next year.

    “This is a tough, but hopeful budget,” Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba said, acknowledging the reality in his budget speech to parliament on Wednesday.

    “We decided that increasing VAT was unavoidable if we are to maintain the integrity of our public finances.”

    As Gigaba read his budget speech, the rand extended gains to 0.81 per cent against the dollar, government bonds firmed and retail shares on the stock exchange fell.

    Whatever cabinet Ramaphosa finally settles on will face an uphill battle to revitalise growth and create jobs in a nation still polarised by race and inequality more than two decades after the end of white-minority rule in 1994.

    Much of the blame for the state of the economy has been laid at the door of Zuma and his allies.

    He was forced to step down as president this month by the ruling African National Congress (ANC), following a series of scandals. He has denied all wrongdoing.

    But treasury officials sought to project a relatively optimistic outlook as they assessed economic prospects for the immediate future.

    Gigaba said poor households would be cushioned against the VAT rate rise through a zero-rating of basic food items such as maize meal and beans, and welfare payments increases.

     

  • ‘OPS ‘ll oppose duplication of VAT, taxes ’

    ‘OPS ‘ll oppose duplication of VAT, taxes ’

    Nigeria Employers’ Consul-tative Association (NECA) has expressed displeasure at attempts by the government  to strangulate businesses through multiple and duplication of taxes and levies in the country.

    It specifically took a swipe at the enactment of Kano State Revenue Administration (Amendment) Law 2017, which imposed Consumption Tax on goods and services bought or rendered in a hotel, restaurant, eatery, bakery, takeaway, suya spot, shopping mall, store, event centre and other similar businesses in the state.

    Reacting to the law, NECA Director-General Mr. Olusegun Oshinowo,  said: “The imposition of Consumption Tax by Kano State amounted to a duplication of Value Added Tax (VAT), which our Laws frown against, as stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Attorney-General of Ogun State vs. Aberuagba and Ors.

    “We do not agree with the imposition of such tax due to the existence of Value Added Tax (VAT) in the country. This is because VAT is a consumption tax collectible by the Federal Government (and shared among the states) in respect of sale of goods and provision of services within the Federation.”

    Oshinowo said in response to this, NECA has instituted an action to challenge such imposition by Kano State government.

    He explained further that the cause of the recent development is the Taxes and Levies (Approved List for Collection) Act (Amendment) Order 2015, which several states are misinterpreting and now leveraging to enact laws that clearly amount to and promote duplication of taxes. This trend, according to him, is spreading like wild fire, going by the recent actions of Kogi and Delta states, just to mention but a few.

    The initiative, he said, is killing business, wealth creation and entrepreneurship, adding that it is equally a clear disincentive to foreign direct investment.

    He said: “While the private sector is not opposed to taxation, it is, however, against illegality and unreasonable taxes through imposition of multiple taxes as well as duplication of taxes. The private sector will not accept a duplication of VAT in any guise, irrespective of the name given to it by state governments”

  • ‘Lagos contributes more than half to VAT’

    ‘Lagos contributes more than half to VAT’

    Over half of Nigeria’s Value Added Tax (VAT) is collected from Lagos State alone, the Minister for Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, has said

    Speaking at the parley between the Federal Government and Progressive Governors Forum (PGF) in Abuja yesterday, Mrs. Adeosun said the 87 per cent of Nigeria’s VAT is derived from four states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    In other words, only 13 per cent of the VAT comes from 32 other states in the federation.

    she said no country in the world with high tax compliance rate is poor, and no rich country has a low tax compliance rate.

    “There is no poor country that has a high tax compliance rate, and no rich country that has a low one,” Adeosun said.

    Quoting VAT collection data across the country, the minister said: “Fifty per cent of Nigeria’s VAT is collected in Lagos State; 20 per cent in FCT; six per cent in Rivers; five per cent form Kano; one per cent in Kaduna.

    “I’m hoping that one day Finance Commissioners will stop needing to come to Abuja monthly to share FAAC, because IGR (internally generated revenue) will be sufficient.”

    earlier, the minister complained about the country’s abysmal tax-to-GDP ratio, which she said was at six per cent, stating it to be one of the lowest in the world.

    Speaking on: The funding Nigeria needs, the minister said the states must do more to generate revenue from with and not depend on the Federal Government for federal allocation.

  • Our VAT plan for domestic airlines, by FIRS

    Our VAT plan for domestic airlines, by FIRS

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has opened a payment window to assist domestic carriers meet their Value Added Tax (VAT) remittance obligations, its Chairman, Babatunde Fowler, has said.

    He made this known during a meeting with a delegation of the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) in Abuja.

    The window, according to him, is where airlines can structure payment of their VAT after two months of billing.

    Fowler described the window as a soft landing for domestic carriers, which will allow for payment reconciliation.

    Under the new arrangement, he said, payments collected by airlines will require two months for reconciliation and remittance to enable the carriers recoup sales.

    The new system, according to him, will allow operators remain in business in the face of economic challenges.

    To him, there is a need for FIRS to support domestic carriers because they are catalysts for economic development.

    This is the first time the tax agency will be partnering AON and IATA to stimulate the growth of aviation.

    Fowler said:“We agree that the airline industry is challenged. Government is not out to make profit, but to make life more comfortable for the people. Exemptions on tax issues  are beyond FIRS as we do not make the law. So, all we can do is to make it easier to give domestic airlines a soft landing by meeting them halfway in order to obey the tax laws.”

    He added that he understood the challenges and multiple charges airlines are faced with, urging the AON to engage the Presidency through the Department on The Ease of Doing Business, the Senate and the Minister of Finance to dialogue on how the laws could be amended to make airlines competitive. Doing this, he said, was one of the ways of achieving lasting solution.

    On his part, AON Chairman, Capt. Nogie Meggison, said the airlines’ body was excited over the partnership, but would want  the tax agency look into complaints lodged by its members.

    He called for more dialogue between the FIRS and AON in order to enhance  understanding of the automation process and allow smooth operations by both parties.

    He said:“Airlines have no issue with paying or collecting the statutory VAT for FIRS, but there was need to take a look at the issue of fairness against our competitors, clarity on the automation as well as a 30-day period to allow for invoicing, reconciliation and billing before payment.“

    Meggison praised  the FIRS boss for the concessions to airlines, noting that it was a step forward in alleviating challenges that have consumed over 25 airlines.

    The AON Chairman appealed  to the FIRS boss to take a closer look at VAT for domestic air transportation in Nigeria, adding that if VAT were to be removed, it would make air fares cheaper.

    His words: “Accra has become the hub for doing business in West Africa today due to the fact that Accra has adopted a deliberate economic policy to make the city a hub for West Africa and as a way of achieving this, it adopted zero VAT for air transportation.

    “ This has also  lowered taxes on aviation fuel by 25 per cent, which has attracted more airlines to fly into Ghana for technical stops and connections to cities around the world. This has had a multiplier effect on the economy and the country at large.

    “Nigeria, therefore, needs to take a bold economic step to jumpstart aviation,”he said.

    Meggison said going by a recent study, the greatest challenge for airlines in Africa is not low cost carriers, but road transport.

    He said this is despite the fact that operators in road, marine and rail transportation do not pay VAT. “It is even painful that  foreign airlines don’t pay VAT,” he added.

    The IATA Area Manager, Southwest Africa,  Samson Fatokun, said  the tax agency should assist airlines in Nigeria by evolving measures that will ensure their sustenance. Absence of such assistance, he said, has led to the collapse of many airlines.

    While identifying multiple charges as part of the problems airlines grapple with, Fatokun said Nigerian carriers have an average mortality rate of 10 years.

    He said there was an inherent problem in the operating environment that increases the high mortality rate.

  • FIRS seal off hotels in Makurdi over unpaid tax

    FIRS seal off hotels in Makurdi over unpaid tax

    The enforcement team of Federal Inland Revenue Service, FIRS from Abuja, on Thursday sealed off a five star Hotel located at No24 Aitku Abubakar Way, in Makurdi. Benue state.

    The team, led by Chinazor Edeh said the hotel belonging to a prominent person has refused to remit VAT to government since 2011; a development he said was unpatriotic.

    He gave the management of the hotel 30 minutes to do the payment before executing warrant on them.

    The hotel, according to a Warrant of Distraint used by the FIRS team to seal it off, was owing about N13, 518,493.00 unpaid tax liabilities.

    The amount was made up of unpaid/unremitted liabilities of the hotel in Company Income Tax, Education Tax, Withholding Tax and Value Added Tax between 2011 to 2016.

    Sealing off the hotel was a heavy task for the FIRS team as the management of Hotel led by Mrs. Margaret Hinger insisted that the company is not owing federal government such amount of tax liability.

    Hinger admitted that the Hotel is aware of the tax liability saying there was delayed in the payment of the said VAT because the figures were duplicated by audit firm mandated to audit the Hotel’s accounts, disclosing that they have already paid the sum of N700, 000.00 to the tax office in Makurdi and appeal to the team to unseal the hotel as they are willing to pay the over N13 millions.

    According to Mr. Edeh, ”I Am ordered by my boss, the Chairman of FIRS Mr. Fowler to seal off the hotel and and am under instrument not to speak with anyone on phone. Please pay the money, we can leave your premises”

    The team ordered the Hotel to discharge its guests and the enforcement team locked up the gates while workers of the hotel instantly closed for the day.

    Consequently, when the period of grace granted to the hotel management elapsed, the enforcement team has no choice but to proceed with the sealing and closing down of operations at the hotel.

    It was at the process of sealing off the premises that a guest who identified himself as Mr. Chukwuemka Chikera  disagreed with the FIRS team, saying he is not checking out of the hotel that the action of FIRS was a violation  human right and infringement on his privacy.

    It took the intervention of security personnel who are members of the team to move him out of the premises.

    The team left a part of the entrance to the hotel opened for guests who may not be in when the warrant was executed and may return to pick their properties later.

    The team warned the security officers at premises that no business should be allowed to take place inside the premises until the payment of the tax liability.

    The next point of call for the team was Treaties Bukka located at Old Otukpo road Makurdi, which according to the Warrant shown to the management of eatery joint, was owing N52 million in unremitted Withholding Tax and VAT from 20013 to 2015.

    The team sealed off the kitchens and all other entrances leading to joint.

    But the Chief Executive officer of the eatery who refused to identified himself but said he was a government appointee, disputed the warrant insisting the name that was written on the warrant is disputable because his company name is not limited company but admitted that his company collects VATs on behalf of government without remittance.

    The enforcement team also sealed off Gwalina Suites Nigeria limited  in unremitted Withholding Tax and VAT from 20012to 2016.

  • SMEs fret over likely increase in VAT

    Small business owners are bracing for a tougher operating environment as they fear the Federal Government will increase Value Added Tax (VAT) to shore up dwindling revenue from crude oil.  Some of them have expressed concerns that the current tax system is costing much as they grapple with scarce foreign exchange (forex) to do business.

    The President, Association of Small Business Owners of Nigeria (ASBON), Dr Femi Egbesola  lamented the tax burden on the frail necks of small, medium enterprises (SMEs)  and wondered  what will happen to small businesses if the government decided to increase VAT from the present five per cent to a higher rate as is being speculated.

    He noted that with their limited resources, SMEs bear higher proportion of the burden in meeting tax compliance obligations.

    He and other small business owners feel that the additional effects of a complex tax system are a detrimental impact on micro businesses and a contribution to the growing existence of tax avoidance schemes seeking to exploit loopholes in existing legislation.

    Furthermore, he added that the tax compliance burden on SMEs is   affecting the nation’s economic growth.

    Making the tax system simpler, he argued, would help to lift this weight, diminishing the operating costs that SMEs face. This, according to him, would give SMEs the space they need to invest in growing their business and hiring more staff.

    It was learnt that some firms are facing challenges with limited availability of forex to buy raw materials.

    Some companies complained that where they have opportunities to procure forex, it was at a black rate which meant that everything it imported now would cost more along with VAT.

    The President, Association of Micro Entrepreneurs of Nigeria (AMEN), Prince Saviour Iche said the challenge was that majority of the inputs into manufacturing were all imported items.

    He said with limited forex, companies were unable to procure raw materials and it placed a significant strain on the manufacturing end of the business.

  • Nigeria can realise N6.7tr yearly from VAT, says ANAN

    Nigeria can realise N6.7tr yearly from VAT, says ANAN

    If the administration of Value Added Tax (VAT) is decentralised to allow states administer tax law, Nigeria can realise average total revenue of N560 billion monthly.

    This is an equivalent of N6.7 trillion yearly, at the five per cent VAT rate, founding President, Association of National Accountants of Nigeria (ANAN), Mr. Omoba Olumuyiwa Sosanya, has said.

    He said the VAT generated by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) is about N58 billion monthly, pointing out that revenue accruable from VAT could increase 10 times if states are authorised to collect VAT with FIRS.

    Sosonya said decentralising VAT administration would capture the informal sector, which is over 85 per cent of the economy into the VAT net. “If our economy must reduce its dependence on oil money, the time has come to reform the tax system and other sources of revenue generation,” he said.

    Sosonya, who spoke during The Nation’s First National Economic Forum in Lagos, said while VAT has brought fortunes to most developed countries and some African countries, such as South Africa and Ghana, “the FIRS is overwhelmed and struggling to find its bearing to turn the administration of VAT into goldmine for Nigerians”.

    He said while South African Revenue Service (SARS) realised R813.8 billion (about N12.5 trillion) in the 2012/2013 fiscal year, Nigeria’s FIRS realised a meagre N861 billion in 2014.

    He regretted that while the funding of Britain’s economy depends mainly on revenue generated from taxes and customs duties, the Nigerian experience is that most revenues generated end up into the private pockets of government officials instead of government coffer.

    Sosonya, therefore, sought the separation of tax and other revenue generation from the Ministry of Finance and a new Ministry of Taxation and Revenue created to handle such matters. This, he said, would make room for proper fiscal transformation and effective management of taxation and other revenue generation.

    He pointed out that the creation of the new ministry was part of the recommendations of Dr. Pius Okigbo’s Task Force on Tax Administration set up in 1978 and implemented by Alhaji Shehu Shagari administration in 1979. “In the UK, there is Secretary for Treasury who is responsible for taxation and allied matters,” he added.

    He also said the Lagos State government has benefited from the increase of its Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) since the appointment of a Special Adviser on Taxation and Revenue in 2007.

    The ANAN founding chief also canvassed the appointment of seasoned professionals as consultants to lay proper foundation for the implementation of the tax reforms over a period of time. “Civil servants should not be mandated to implement these reforms,” he added.

  • ‘Economy too fragile to support VAT, IGR increase’

    ‘Economy too fragile to support VAT, IGR increase’

    The economy is unproductive and can’t support raising internally generated revenue (IGR) or increasing value added tax (VAT), a public affairs analyst, Obiora Akabogu, has said.

    He said raising IGR and VAT to cushion the effects of the cash crunch that gripped federal and state governments following the continued slide in oil prices would not work because Nigerian masses are already impoverished by the economy’s unproductiveness.

    “VAT is derived from a productive, but an economy that is near comatose makes it difficult for federal and state governments to raise money by increasing IGR and VAT, because the masses are impoverished,” he said, adding that “Nigeria is operating a mono-cultural and precarious economy, which is dependent on one major revenue source, which is oil.”

    The exepert was reacting to a recommendation by the Managing Director, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Ms. Christine Lagarde, who, during her recent visit to Nigeria, advocated the broadening of the country’s revenue base by increasing the VAT paid for goods and services.

    According to the IMF chief, Nigeria’s VAT rate was not only among the lowest in the world, but also well below VAT rates in other countries of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), a recommendation that appears to enjoy the support of the Senate, the upper chamber of the National Assembly.

    Senators had during the second day of debate of the  principles of the 2016 budget of N6.08 trillion, last week called for heavy taxation of Nigerians to make up for the shortfalls that may arise in the projected revenues.

    One of the projected revenues in the budget already crashing is the N820 billion oil revenue that is at a deficit of N395 billion, following the drop in oil price to $27 per barrel as against $38 per barrel benchmark in the budget.

    Senators argued that instead of relying heavily on borrowing to implement the budget, which goes by average of N500million daily, heavy taxation is a better option. Senate Chief Whip, Olusola Adeyeye (APC Osun Central), who led the debate, said without spreading the dragnet of taxation, there would be no money to fund the budget, especially in the face of dwindling oil revenues.

  • VAT: MAN backs govt’s decision

    The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) has praised the Federal Government’s decision not to increase the Value Added Tax (VAT).

    In a statement by its President, Dr. Frank Jacob, the group described the manufacturing environment as very unfriendly, saying it has many challenges that have lingered on for decades.

    “Manufacturers in Nigeria are faced with the challenges of providing their infrastructure which in some states of the federation are subjected to taxes by the government.

    “A situation where a manufacturing company is forced to run on generators most of the time is, to say the least, unacceptable. This accounts for about 40 per cent of the cost of production whereas in some climes, these are taken for granted. Lending rates in Nigeria, especially to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), are about the highest in the world. Major challenges include infrastructure, cost, environmental and social challenges. With these challenges and the consequent high cost of production, Nigerian products cannot be competitive in any way,’’ he said.

    Jacob said increasing the VAT rate would only exacerbate the challenges of the sector as well as the cost of production and make local products less competitive.

  • VAT on services of banks and other financial institutions

    VAT on services of banks and other financial institutions

    The Value Added Tax Act Cap V1 LFN 2004 (as amended) imposes a tax known as Value Added Tax (VAT) on taxable goods and services.  Part 2 of the First Schedule to the Act only exempts services rendered by Community banks, Peoples bank and Mortgage institutions from VAT. Accordingly, all banks and financial institutions, except those exempted are required to charge VAT on services rendered by them to their customers and account for same to the Federal Inland Revenue Service.This is in line with Section 2 of the Act, which stipulates that “the tax shall be charged and payable on the supply of all goods and services (in this Act referred to as “taxable goods and services”) other than those goods and services listed in the First Schedule to this Act.

     

    Definition of Bank and other Financial Institutions

    These are legal entities incorporated under the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA)of 1990 and engage in banking and financial activities as defined by the Banks and other Financial Institutions Act(BOFIA), 1991.  They are companies within the financialsector of the Nigerian economy and are either publicly quoted or private companies.  Banks will ordinarily include commercial banks, merchant banks and development banks while other financial institutions will include; finance houses, insurance companies, re-insurance companies,stock-brokerage firms, investment companies and financial consultants.

     

    VAT Liability

    Banks in particular, charge commission, fees, or other charges for services rendered to theircustomers.  VAT calculations are expected to be based only on the charges made forservices rendered.  It should however, be noted that the focus of VAT is on the charges leviedon customers for the consumption of services rendered by Banks.

    The provision of loans and advances does not in itself constitute a vatable service but thereare other ancillary services to the provision of bank loan/advances or bank overdrafts, which arevatable.  The documentation and perfection of loan/overdraft agreements are examplesof such ancillary services and fees charged,which would attract VAT. The resultant interest chargeable on the loans and overdraft is however not vatable.

    Insurance companies’ brokers/agents earn commission, loss adjusters earn fees, surveyors earn fees, brokers earn commission and agents earn commission for various services rendered to the Insurance Companies.  The services which generated these income are vatable services, andeven though the premium received on policies is not vatable as it represents cost of risk tothe insured, the commission paid to brokers/agent from premium will attract VAT; with theburden of VAT being borne by the insurance company itself.

     

    Vatable Services Rendered by Financial Institutions

    In arriving at what constitutes vatable financial services, a distinction should be made betweenactivities that constitute return on investment and consumption of services rendered by financialinstitutions.All charges arising from the services of banks and financial institutions will ordinarily attract VAT and they include among others, the following:

    • Commissions/fees charged on forex trading or remittance;
    • Commission on turnover (COT), ledger fees etc;
    • Legal and other fees chargeable on lease arrangements;
    • Fees charged for advisory services e.g. mergers and acquisition, financial strategy counseling etc;
    • Fees chargeable on public/private issues;
    • Debt conversion fees;
    • Fees/commission on asset trading;
    • Fees earned on fund management;
    • Fees and commissions earned on letters of credit/documentary collection to finance import/export;
    • Commissions on sale of Bank drafts/certified cheques;
    • Fees chargeable on stock-brokerage and trust services;
    • Commissions paid to brokers, reinsurers, underwriters and other insurance agents by an insurer.

     

    Services of Banks and Other Financial Institutions not Liable to VAT

    A simple criteria for determining whether a service is vatable or not is the identification of those activities that constitute return on investment as distinct from those that represent consumption of services. The services of Banks and other Financial Institutions that willnot attract VAT include:

    • Premium on insurance policies;
    • Interest on loans/advances and overdraft facilities;
    • Interest on savings accounts;
    • Interest on bank deposits;
    • Dividends;
    • Interbank placements; and
    • Profit/gain on disposal of government securities.

     

    VAT Registration and Rendition of Returns

    Banks and other Financial Institutions are taxable persons within the provisions of the VAT Act and all services rendered by them are taxable with the exception of the servicesof Peoples Bank, Community Banks and Mortgage Institutions, which are exempted by theVAT Act. These Banks and Other Financial Institutions are to register for tax with the relevant tax office and obtain TIN. VAT returns are tobe made regularly to the relevant tax office within twenty one (21) days after the month oftransaction.

     

    Accounting Procedure and Records to be kept by Banks

    The mode of operation in the banks does not permit the issuance of tax invoices to customers. The VAT charges therefore have to bereflectedin the customers’ statements of accounts in order to enhance disclosure and easy verificationby tax officers. Banks and other Financial Institutions are required to adopt the following simple methods of recording their transactions for VAT purposes:

    (i)      When any service is identified as vatable, internal entries are raised by the Bank for the cost of the service plus 5% VAT.

    (ii)     The Bank is expected to debit the account of the customer accordingly with the cost of the service plus the 5% VAT charged.

    (iii)    Credit the Income account of the Bank or Institution with the income elementof the charge excluding the VAT

    (iv)Credit the FIRS VAT account in the particular Bank or Institution with the 5% VATdeducted from (ii) to arrive at (iii).

    Section 16 subsection (b) provides that where input tax exceeds output tax, the taxpayer will be entitled to refund of the excess tax from the FIRS on production of such documents as theFIRS may, from time to time require.  With regards to banks and otherfinancial institutions, thisis not applicable because of the provision of Section 17 of Value Added Tax Act on allowable input tax, which provides that input tax on any overhead, service, and general administration of any business which otherwise can be expended through the income statement (profit and loss accounts) shall not be allowed as a deduction from output tax.

    It is a common knowledge that the bank and other Financial Institutions render services; they do not produce goods and therefore regarded as final consumer of those goods purchased or servicesrendered to them.  In this connection, all input VAT payable in respect of assets purchasedfor use in the banks and other Financial Institutions should be added to the cost of the assets on which capitalallowances may be claimed.  Similarly, all VAT payable in respect of services consumed by the bank should be regarded as part of normal operational expenses chargeable to Statement of Profit or Loss Account. Under no circumstance should input tax on such items be claimed or deducted from output tax collected.  Banks and other Financial Institutions cannot claim or deduct any input tax suffered.  The entire amount collected on behalf of the FIRS should be promptly remitted in whole as prescribed by the law.

     

    The Central Bank

    The position of the Central bank with regards to VAT payment is not different from that of otherbanks in the system.  The Central Bank performs nearly all the services listed in paragraph 4 aboveand also acts as banker to other banks.  It is therefore expected that VAT would be charged on payments made to it by the banks for vatable services rendered to them.  This makes it necessaryfor the Central Bank to register for VAT purposes.

     

    Offences and Penalties

    Banks and other Financial Institutions have obligations to fulfill under the VAT Act like other taxable or registered persons.  Part V of the Act contains the list of offences and penalties to be imposed.  These include among others:

    • Failure to register within six (6) months of the existence of a bank;
    • Failure to issue tax invoice (debit note showing amount of VAT collected in the case of banks); failure to charge and remit VAT collected;
    • Failure to keep proper records and accounts;
    • Rendition of incorrect or false returns.

    For these offences, stringent penalties are imposed to check possible defaults.

    Banks and other Financial Institutions are taxable persons within the provisions of the VAT Act and all their services are vatable except those specifically mentioned in the First Schedule. Bank officials are strongly advised to familiarize themselves with the provisions of the VAT Act.  Whatever is peculiar to any Bank or Financial Institution in terms of procedures which has not been dealt with in this circular should be referred to the FIRS without delay.

    Finally, where computerization has been established and it is likely to skip these procedures, the FIRS should be notified of the system in operation and how it would take care of all procedures without leaving out anything uncaptured.