Tag: Xenophobia

  • On Xenophobia in South Africa

    On Xenophobia in South Africa

    This is, of course, not the best of time for a section of the estimated 15 million Nigerians who reside abroad. This is because, apart from the fact that some of them have been passing through self-inflicted ordeals, many are truly victims of xenophobic attacks by the citizens and the governments of their host countries. For instance, the tales brought home by those Nigerians recently deported from Libya have been those of woes – rape, forced labour, forceful prostitution, modern slavery and physical attacks. Forty-three Nigerians were also on February 23, deported from Europe to Nigeria. While Nigeria is still awaiting more deportees from Libya as reported by the Nigerian media, then came the bad news report (The Nation of Sunday, February 19, P.5)that, “businesses operated by Nigerians came under attacks by South Africans in Pretoria West of the country. According to Ikechukwu Anyere, President, Nigerian Union in South Africa as quoted in the report, “as we speak, five buildings with Nigerian businesses, including a church have been looted and burned by South Africans”. “One of the buildings , a mechanic garage with 28 cars under repairs, with other vital documents, were burned during the attacks”.
    As a phenomenon of hate, xenophobia is the hurling of anger, fear and hatred towards foreign objects or people in a country; at its extreme, it entails killing of aliens. Indeed, xenophobia is not an eerie phenomenon in human relations even in global context for it has manifested in numerous parts of the world under different guises and circumstances. The anti-blacks antics of the Ku Klux Klan in the USA; the incident of Japanese internment camps in the USA during the World War II which culminated in the inhumation of thousands of Japanese-Americans; the killing of over six million Jews by the Nazi government in Germany between 1941 and 1945; and the killing of nationals, such as the Poles and Gypsies during the Third Rich in Germany among others, are clear manifestations of xenophobia.
    The xenophobic attack of February 18 in South Africa was of course not the first of its kind in recent times in that country. It will be recalled that in April 2015, large scale attacks were targeted at African immigrants from countries such as Nigeria, Mozambique, Somalia, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo. It was reportedly provoked by the lamentation of Zulu King, Goodwill Zwalithini that foreigners were making life difficult for South Africans as they had taken over the South African economy. In that incident, the News Agency of Nigeria reported that, apart from lives, Nigerians lost properties valued at about 1.2million rand (about N21million then). Several other incidents of xenophobic attack had earlier been recorded in the country between 1995 and 2006.
    Traced to racial discrimination which prevailed in the country in apartheid years between 1948-1994, xenophobia today, has assumed the national character of the South African state. According to a study based on a citizen survey across member states of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) published by the South African Migration Projects (SAMP), South Africans have been found to hold the most intense anti-foreigner sentiment, with 21% disposing to complete ban of entry by foreigners and 64% expressing preference for imposition of stringent conditions for foreigners to be granted “entry visas” into the country. The germane question at this juncture is this: what are the underlining causes of this attitude of hate towards aliens particularly towards fellow Africans, by South Africans?
    The undercurrents of this attitude of no love lost, range from the serious to the unserious, though with very serious consequences too. According to a report of the Human Sciences Research Council, xenophobia in South Africa can be hinged and blamed on the quartet of: relative deprivation of South Africans allegedly caused by the aliens in the country which is a consequence of keen competition for jobs and social facilities; group processes, including psychological categorization processes that are nationalistic rather than superordinate; South African exceptionalism, or a feeling of superiority in relation to other Africans and exclusive citizenship or a form of nationalism that excludes others. Prominent among the frivolous ones though with equally damaging consequences is the competition between South African young men and other rich African young men especially Nigerians, over South African girls, a game in which Nigerians have been adjudged winsome because of their munificence.
    Indeed, the challenge of xenophobia has far reaching implications not only for the development and standing of South Africa in Africa and in the world at large, but also for the lofty goals of integrating the continent of Africa and promoting sustainable development. For example, in a paper presented by Professor Akinsola Alaba Agagu and I, on: “The Challenges of Xenophobia and Terrorism for the Development of Higher Education in Africa” , at a Conference held in the 95-year-old University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, in 2015, we had raised the sobering alarm that, following incessant incident of xenophobic attacks in South Africa, the image being created for the country to the outside world is that of a state that is hostile to foreigners. This we observed might discourage fellow Africans to gravitate to South Africa for the pursuit of any form of socio-economic activities including higher education. This being so, the cross fertilization of ideas and values which ought to occur through cross-border seminars, workshops and conferences among other web of interactions , may be slowed down. Besides, as xenophobia is also against the philosophical underpinning of the concept and processes of African Union, proper integration of the continent cannot of course take place in an atmosphere of hate.
    Let it therefore, be said that , the South African authority should realize that other African countries also have the capacity to retaliate. Should this be done, South African economic interest and of course the interests of the countries hosting South African investments will be in jeopardy. Thus both ways, the continent is the loser.
    If this growing wave of xenophobic attacks is not arrested, it may constitute a major setback on the parts of higher education institutions in Africa to provide common front in strengthening themselves in capacity building as well as solving the continent’s sustainable development challenges. As the emergence and growth of xenophobia is largely attributable to perpetuation of relative deprivation and misrule by many African leaders, it is recommended that African leaders embark on restorative justice; cultivation of liberal political attitude; eschew politics of winner takes all; creation of empowerment and employment opportunities for the teeming jobless youths and enthroning social security system to mitigate the problem of acute poverty. In addition, genuine Africa leaders must frontally fight corruption. Successful war against corruption will certainly free more resources to the states which can be used to promote development and reduce poverty and by extension stem the tide of violent actions. Furthermore, it is also imperative for African regional and continental bodies like the African Union, the Economic Community of West African States and the Southern African Development Community to use their platforms to evolve mechanisms which can enhance the African philosophy of “be your brother’s keeper”. African governments should re-orientate their citizens that humanity is one. We are all one in the family of souls. If Africans do condemn Europeans discrimination against Africans, discrimination among Africans should therefore be unjustifiable under any condition or circumstance. As a book of life has asserted, anybody who says a man’s place of birth is necessarily the only place he must earn a living, is guilty of war. True it is that, the reality of African politics is ethnic struggle, however, it is high time our ethno-political relations are tempered with love and sense of oneness.

    •Dr. Adebisi is of Federal College of Agriculture, Akure, Ondo State.

  • Xenophobia: NSCDC uncovers plans to attack MTN in Bayelsa

    The Bayelsa State command of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) has uncovered plans by some persons to attack investments of MTN in the state as a reprisal for ongoing attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.

    The state’s Commander of NSCDC, Mr. Desmond Agu, said in a statement in Yenagoa on Monday that the corps was on red alert to stop aggrieved persons from destroying MTN’s facilities in the state.

    Agu said intelligence reports revealed that such persons were planning to vent their anger on MTN’s masts and other facilities.

    He advised persons behind such plots to desist from toeing a violent path and appealed to members of the public to report suspicious persons to the corps.

    He said: “Our attention has been drawn to an intelligence report that some persons are planning to carry out an attack on South African investments especially the MTN’s telecommunication masts and other facilities following the ongoing xenophobia attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.

    “Members of the public especially Bayelsans are hereby advised to desist from such acts and avoid taking laws into their hands.

    “As an organisation saddled with the responsibility of protecting our critical national infrastructures, the command remains committed to deliver on its mandate.

    “Members of the public are hereby advised to report persons or group of persons suspected to be planning such attacks to the command.”

  • Xenophobia or Afrophobia

    Xenophobia or Afrophobia

    IN a statement issued by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and the Diaspora, Abike Dabiri-Erewa, some 116 Nigerians have been murdered in South Africa by angry South Africans in jealous, supposedly xenophobic rage in the last two years. In 2016 alone, the statement said, 20 Nigerians lost their lives to the horde of bitter, angry South Africans, some of whom were policemen carrying out extrajudicial killings against Nigerians. While some of the murdered Nigerians owned respectable businesses, a few others admittedly lived on the edge of the law. But whatever the reasons, the killings are unjustified because they were done outside the rule of law.
    It is only in recent times that Nigeria has been up in arms against the tormentors of her citizens abroad. Previously, the country had been extremely slow in coming to the defence of Nigerians overseas, with the government sometimes arguing that Nigerians engaging in criminal activities were simply getting their just deserts. That cynicism was a long-standing one. Nigeria was not only eager to betray its citizens abroad, it even sometimes openly damned them and cheapened their worth. Worse, by also engaging in extrajudicial killings within the country, sometimes flagrantly, and with the world horrified by Nigeria’s indifference to those killings, it seems an irony that it is also now complaining of extrajudicial killings carried out by other country’s security forces and their angry and sometimes unreasonable public.
    Nigeria needs a fundamentally different approach to understanding the rights and privileges of citizens. Extradition must not be carried out with the kind of levity observed among Nigerian leaders and law enforcement agencies. The worth of a Nigerian life must be reiterated wherever Nigerians are living or sojourning, and the government must as a rule come to their aid regardless of whether they are accused of crime or not. That support must be taken for granted. But in order not to be guilty of hypocrisy, Nigeria must also banish extrajudicial killings within its own borders, whether carried out by security agencies or lynch mobs, and scrupulously respect the rule of law, regardless of who is concerned and no matter how unpleasant abiding by the law is.
    Nigerian leaders need to recognise that the attacks against Nigerians in South Africa for what they are: they are not just xenophobia, for other foreigners from other continents are not being similarly murdered; it is in fact Afrophobia. Like Nigeria, South Africa also has contempt for black people. The continent has a low self-esteem, and its rulers have contempt for their citizens. It is time African leaders consciously remedied the problem. Nigeria should take a lead in doing this, not just because its citizens are the most affected in South Africa, but because it is the wise thing to do. For Nigeria to offer that leadership, however, it must come into equity with clean hands, for equity does not aid a party at fault.

  • Xenophobia: S/African police fire rubber bullets at protesters

    Xenophobia: S/African police fire rubber bullets at protesters

    South African police yesterday fired rubber bullets, tear gas and stun grenades to break up violent clashes between machete and rock wielding protesters and migrants in Pretoria at an anti-immigration march.

    That was shortly after President Jacob Zuma condemned acts of violence by his fellow countrymen  against foreigners, particularly Nigerians.

    Shops and homes owned by Nigerians have been looted and torched over the last two weeks.

    Some South Africans branded  the properties as brothels and drug dens.

    The violence is the latest in a series by South Africans who are groaning under high unemployment and dire poverty.

    Riot police in Pretoria formed lines to keep apart about 1,000 protesters as tensions rose  between some South Africans and migrants from Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Somalia, Pakistan and elsewhere.

    South African marcher Aysha Ali, 25, daubed  Nigerians “very bad.”

    “They are bringing drugs into our community. I support the protest,” he said.

    Some officers shot rubber rounds at close range at protesters lying on the ground.

    President Zuma condemned the xenophobic unrest and acknowledged the  ”destruction of property directed at non-nationals.”

    “Residents in some communities blame non-nationals for the escalating crimes, especially drug trafficking,” he said in a statement issued by his office.

    He added:”Many citizens of other countries living in South Africa are law-abiding and contribute to the economy of the country positively.

    “It is wrong to brandish all non-nationals as drug dealers or human traffickers.

    “The threats and counter-threats on social media must stop.”

    He asked South Africans to refrain from using migrants as a scapegoat for the country’s widespread crime problems, but was quick to add that government would crack down on drug-dealing and illegal immigrants.

    Nigeria earlier  in the week told  the African Union to step in to stop “xenophobic attacks” on its citizens in South Africa and recalled that  20 Nigerians were killed last year.

    Pretoria disputed  the figure  and blamed  many violent deaths in the country on  criminal activity rather than anti-immigrant sentiment.

  • Violence erupts at anti-migrant protest in South Africa

    Violence erupts at anti-migrant protest in South Africa

    The Police in South African on Friday fired rubber bullets, tear gas and stun grenades to break up clashes between local protesters and immigrants at a rally in Pretoria against foreigners.

    Several South Africans marched toward the foreign ministry calling for the deportation of foreigners who they claim have taken their jobs, an incident which has led to the killing of several Nigerians.

    “We don’t have hate! We don’t have hate!” one foreign man was heard shouting in a video posted by eNCA, a local broadcaster.

    Police tried to keep protesters, some of them armed with sticks and pipes, apart from foreigners who were gathered to express alarm about recent attacks.

    [quote color=”#000000″ bgcolor=”#a4c47d” bcolor=”#b2b2b2″ arrow=”yes”]There was a standoff between 100 protestors and 100 or so mostly Somali nationals who had come out onto the streets … saying they would defend themselves, their families homes and businesses, said Al Jazeera’s Tania Page, reporting from Johannesburg.[/quote]

    South Africa’s unemployment rate is above 25 percent.

    While some foreigners are blamed for “stealing jobs”, others are accused of crimes such as drug-dealing.

    Resentment against foreigners has sometimes turned deadly.

    In 2015, anti-immigrant riots in and around the city of Durban killed at least six people. In 2008, similar violence killed at least 62 people.

    The main group behind Friday’s protests, Mamelodi Concerned Residents, remained peaceful.

    But Pretoria’s police said in a statement that another group of people from Atteridgeville, which is west of Pretoria, “blocked roads, burnt tyres and threw stones”.

  • Xenophobia: Nigerians must restrain from violence – Bongo

    Xenophobia: Nigerians must restrain from violence – Bongo

    An expert in development economics at the Lagos Business School, Dr. Adi Bongo, has implored Nigerians to resist the pressure of embarking on reprisal attacks on South African installations and companies in Nigeria.

    Bongo, a UNU Fellow and a World Bank scholar stated that if Nigerians should go ahead in attacking the companies, they might be denying their fellow citizens their source of livelihood.

    “As Nigerians, we understand better and we must restrain ourselves from going ahead to attack South African owned companies in Nigeria because the people employed there are Nigerians. When these businesses are destroyed, the source of livelihood of the Nigerians who are working in those companies will be affected,” Bongo said.

    Concerning what could have been responsible for the renewed attacks on Nigerians having recently had the same issue, Bongo said, “The violence of that scale is often a symptom of deeper social malaise. South African economy is also as badly hit as that of Nigeria.

    “The country is also affected by the downturn in economic situations of countries across the world, particularly African countries. There is a large scale of drop in the prices of commodities. Unfortunately, the poor in the society becomes restive and look for whom to vent their anger on and unfortunately, Nigerians who have businesses in South Africa, this time are affected.”

    On the threat of reprisal attacks by the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) and other groups in Nigeria, he said, “We should discourage any move that will lead to violence. The Nigerian government should quickly explore all diplomatic means at resolving the issue.

    “The Federal government must objectively engage its South African counterpart to protect the lives and businesses of Nigerians in South Africa. We must not encourage incivility.”

    It would be recalled that a group of people on Thursday staged a protest which eventually turned violent at the MTN Nigeria regional office in Abuja, Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory.

    The protesters were expressing their discontent based on the xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa.

  • Xenophobia: South African police fire rubber bullets at protesters

    South African police on Friday fired rubber bullets, tear gas and stun grenades to break up violent clashes between machete and rock wielding protesters and migrants in Pretoria at an anti-immigration march.

    That was shortly after President Jacob Zuma condemned acts of violence by his fellow countrymen against foreigners, particularly Nigerians.

    Shops and homes owned by Nigerians have been looted and torched over the last two weeks.

    Some South Africans branded the properties as brothels and drug dens.

    The violence is the latest in a series by South African who are groaning under high unemployment and dire poverty.

    Riot police in Pretoria formed lines to keep apart about 1,000 protesters as tensions rose between some South Africans and migrants from Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Somalia, Pakistan and elsewhere.

    South African marcher Aysha Ali, 25, daubed Nigerians as “very bad.”

    “They are bringing drugs into our community. I support the protest,” he said.

    Some officers shot rubber rounds at close range at protesters lying on the ground.

    President Zuma condemned the xenophobic unrest, and acknowledged the “destruction of property directed at non-nationals.”

    “Residents in some communities blame non-nationals for the escalating crimes especially drug trafficking,” he said in a statement issued by his office.

    He added: “Many citizens of other countries living in South Africa are law abiding and contribute to the economy of the country positively.

    “It is wrong to brandish all non-nationals as drug dealers or human traffickers.

    “The threats and counter-threats on social media must stop.”

    He asked South Africans to refrain from using migrants as a scapegoat for the country’s widespread crime problems, but was quick to add that government would crack down on drug-dealing and illegal immigrants.

    Nigeria earlier in the week told the African Union to step in to stop “xenophobic attacks” on its citizens in South Africa, and recalled that 20 Nigerians were killed last year.

    Pretoria disputed the figure, and blamed many violent deaths in the country on criminal activity rather than anti-immigrant sentiment.

     

     

  • Seun Kuti blames Mandela for Xenophobia

    Seun Kuti blames Mandela for Xenophobia

    Followig recent reports of violence against Nigerians and other nationals in South Africa, Seun Kuti, son of Afrobeat legend, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, has accused the late president of the country, Nelson Mandela for the xenophobic attacks.

    Seun, the charismatic leader of Fela’s legendary Afrobeat orchestra, Egypt 80 questioned the attacks in a Facebook post.

    He asks; “Hey Black South Africans aren’t you ashamed of yourselves? Has your spirit of revolution completely destroyed by your rudderless ANC to the extent that you have become cowards who bully fellow Africans? Fellow Brothers?”

    The post further reads: “Ok answer me this. If every Nigerian is deported out of South Africa there will be no more crime in South Africa? There will be no more injustice and inequality? Mandela once again thanks for your rainbow nation. Thanks for teaching your people to love whites but forgot to tell them to embrace blacks.”

    Though his father passed on almost two decades ago, his spirit still lives on in Seun Kuti as he has proven himself to be an outspoken political activist.

     

  • Xenophobia and Nigeria/South Africa relations

    The latest wave of violent attacks on the Nigerians living in South Africa has generated local and international condemnation. This article examines the   core issues of racial intolerance and dislike for foreigners, particularly Nigerians in South Africa, within the broader historical framework of the apartheid regime and the post-apartheid socio-economic relations which have over time shaped the existential notions of false community, vague entitlement and empty sense of belonging amongst a number of black South Africans. It further highlights and provides fresh perspectives to addressing reverse migration and building for Nigeria a positive foreign policy template that promotes genuine national pride and national interest.

    Indeed, the issue of xenophobia in contemporary South Africa in my view is profound psychosomatic carryovers and the negative product of the apartheid regime that cannot be wished away from the collective consciousness of the people of the rainbow nation. This is even more so, given the attendant dispossession of their heritage and personal pride by the despicable and repugnant apartheid regime, which exploited them in their own land. The reality of these historical facts has continued to obstruct the wheel of progress and development. Furthermore, the political crisis of that dark era led to social dislocation, which in turn affected their economic means, educational advancement and developing the required skill sets that would have prepared them for high-level jobs and proper integration into a new South Africa promising a brighter future.

    While xenophobic violence is not a new phenomenon in post-apartheid South Africa, the sudden explosion of violence has been attributed to a combination of factors which include local political pressures over time, increases in prices of basic goods, high levels of unemployment estimated at 25 percent and growing concerns and frustrations at the inability of the South African government under incumbent President Jacob Zuma to provide essential services to poor people and the resultant economic hardship and tensions surrounding crime and competition over scarce resources by non-national population. The continued socio-economic issues are pushing the average Black South African into extreme poverty in the midst of plenty and there is a high level of dissatisfaction with the scheme of things after the fall of the apartheid regime.

    It would be recalled that between May and June 2008, there were 135 separate violent incidents that left 62 people dead, at least 670 wounded and unfortunately, dozens were carnally assaulted and many properties destroyed and looted. In addition, the South Africa domestic environment has been hostile to non- nationals particularly, undocumented migrants and there is implicit culture of impunity, which encourages mob justice in most communities. Interestingly, South African state security institutions such as the police and immigration services show no sympathy to black settlers from other African countries; the xenophobia appears institutionalized. Therefore, Nigeria’s international diplomacy should not dwell much on the criticism of the recent xenophobic attacks in South Africa, but rather much attention should be placed on understanding the dynamics of international politics, which is a game of selective morality, outrageous paradox and double standard. Hence, concrete efforts should be made at home to culture an enabling environment that would create jobs and livelihoods for the common people in Nigeria. In addition, Nigeria must re-jig her diplomatic institutions to engage the South African government.

    It is important to note that people migrating in search of safer and more prosperous living conditions is as old as man and the right of any person to leave any country is enshrined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

    While it is not possible to eliminate social tensions in any country, it is expedient on the part of the South African government and its nationals to respect universal and regional treaties, declarations, norms, protocols and conventions rather than resort to barbarous acts that have outraged the conscience of Nigerians and Africans. Indeed the unwholesome politicisation of migration as an excuse for xenophobia in South Africa must be addressed by diplomatic means by both countries. The issues and factors of migration that include increased unemployment, poverty and greed must be top in re-tooling the new Nigeria-South Africa partnership. Both countries must promote and sustain protection mechanisms for human rights and conducive environments for decent work by migrant workers and their families whether documented (economic) migrants or undocumented migrants.

    Sadly, one major challenge in Nigeria-South Africa relations over years, beyond the recent violent attacks on Nigerians and other Africans, is lack of mutual diplomatic and tactful reciprocity on the part of the South Africa government and the country’s non-state actors for the strategic role Nigeria played in the struggle against apartheid. In addition, this is why Nigerians are angry at the latest attacks. Nigeria played a frontline role in ensuring freedom for black South Africans through the mobilisation of international opinion to isolate the apartheid regime in the global community, business and sports.

    Equally, Nigeria has also provided a robust and unrestricted market for South African businesses like MTN and Multichoice. Therefore, Nigeria must also forge strategic business alliance in South Africa to balance the insalubrious business equation. Furthermore, beyond the existing skewed bilateral and economic relations in favour of South African businesses in Nigeria, there is an urgent need for both countries to initiate a liberalised migration regime and a robust migration management capacity towards enhancing and strengthening the strategic role of Nigerians in the diasporas as development partner and factoring their contributions to the overall Africa development agenda for sustainable peace and security.

    The two countries in my view are not exploiting their leadership and governance roles in sustaining the African dream and indeed the drive for poverty eradication through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Indeed, South Africa and Nigeria, representing the two leading economies in Africa, must play leading roles in driving a sustainable green revolution that would provide food security thereby contributing significantly to overcoming hunger and social tensions that have fueled African emigrations. It is imperative for the government under the leadership of President Muhammadu Buhari to escalate and mainstream key external relations that are mutually beneficial in ties with South Africa, while respecting all treaties and obligations on persons and related matters.

    Crucially, sustained job creation particularly for youths at home and positive image-building abroad would enhance the respectability of Nigerians in the Diasporas and indeed address the negative way the world sees us as a people and a nation. Furthermore, our government at home must understand the relationship between poverty, irregular migration and the overall issues of xenophobia, which is not new in South Africa.

    Nigeria’s relevance within the global system depends on relative strength and control at the domestic level and our continued relevance within the Africa continent and indeed the changing world. Against this backdrop, Nigeria’s international communication and reputational image-building mechanisms must be hinged on diplomatic caution and decency to safeguard our nationals wherever they are in the globe, beyond the xenophobic realities in South Africa.

    In addition, the African union (AU) has to be alive to its continental responsibility for the emancipation of Africans from the clutches of poverty, walking the talk of development for its people across the continent.

    Overall, Nigeria’s international engagement strategy should be done with diplomatic finesse and dexterity and pragmatic efforts should be pursued to improve on our foreign relations mechanisms, particularly on the issues of cross-border migration. Nigeria should desire to play by the rule of international obligations in spite of its visible failings at home in providing basic social welfare and essential services for majority of its people who live on less than one dollar a day. The challenge of xenophobic attacks again is wake up call for the Nigerian government to organise its affairs by improving living conditions at home, as well as strengthening its foreign policy objectives.

     

    • Orovwuje is founder, Humanitarian Care for Displaced Persons, Lagos.
  • Xenophobia: Proposed protest by S/Africans, Nigerians seek refuge

    Xenophobia: Proposed protest by S/Africans, Nigerians seek refuge

    The Nigerian community in South Africa on Thursday urged the Nigerian Mission in that country to provide refuge for women and children,  ahead of a proposed march by South Africans.

    The President, Nigeria Union, Mr Ikechukwu Anyene, and Secretary, Adetola Olubajo, made the request in a letter to the Nigerian Mission in South Africa.

    The letter stated that the union was aware of the proposed march in Pretoria on Friday, adding that it could turn violent.

    Nigerians, it said, were still living in fear because of inadequate protection by the police.

    “We are requesting that women and children that are Nigerian citizens living in Pretoria West and its environs should be allowed to take refuge at the High Commission on Friday.

    “We are making this request to ensure their safety as the protest march may turn violent,” it said.

    It stated that members of the union had accompanied Nigeria’s Consul General in South Africa, Amb.  Uche Ajulu-Okeke, on a fact-finding visit to the affected areas on Wednesday.

    Ajulu-Okeke said after the visit that a contingency arrangement would be made to accommodate Nigerian women and children at the High Commission in Pretoria and Consulate in Johannesburg during the march.

    [feature_slider display=”tag” tag=”Xenophobia” count=”6″ caption=”on” nav=”thumbs” animation=”crossfade” easing=”easeInOutCubic” arrows=”on”]