Tag: Yoruba

  • New face of Yoruba monarchy

    For about six years now, tradition and youthfulness have been cohabiting in some notable Yoruba kingdoms, and the result of this is visible civilisation within these environs. The practice, which commenced with the enthronement of Oba Saheed Ademola Elegushi (Kesenla III), was not without initial criticisms because no one would have thought that a youthful mind was capable of the vast intelligence and maturity that became manifest in the Elegushi’s ability to continue to keep Ikateland together, and attract development to the kingdom.

    The enormous responsibilities of kingship is enough reason to inspire doubts about the aptitudes of new generation of Yoruba Kings to act as custodians of our traditions, and perhaps consider them unworthy of ascending the thrones of their forefathers.  Now, time has come to establish as myopic, the thinking that youthfulness could rob these middle-aged kings of the capacity to provide appropriate leadership and exercise sound judgement. The blinkered minds, predicated on deep-seated attachment to culture and tradition, have changed dramatically to embrace the freshness of youthfulness.

    Like other people, I had thought that his Master’s degree in Economics and extensive public service experience could not have sufficiently prepared him for a reign over three million people – a kingdom which is almost the size of Kuwait, although not as endowed, but as demographically diverse Kuwait. It was natural to reason that the incumbent Elegushi might not fittingly glide into the expansive shoes of the former Elegushi, Oba Yekini Adeniyi Elegushi, his father whose influence cut across ethnic and religious barriers.

    Alas! Oba Saheed Ademola Elegushi (Kusenla III) has demonstrated that youthfulness midwifes innovation. His reign over Ikateland has shown that  Nigerian  youths are ready for leadership responsibilities. As the mascot of his generation of Kings, Kusenla III’s selfless and practical outlook is telling of the depth and resourcefulness of our generation of youths. In realistic terms, the perceived risk of entrusting Ikateland, a historically significant town, into the hands of a 34-year old man six years back, is now widely adjudged an advantage.

    Ikateland would have lost the benefits of Oba Ademola Elegushi’s mental agility to a cosmetic barrier mounted by age, but the progenitors of Ikateland would not renege on their covenant of development and progress. Accordingly, they made possible his ascension to their throne for activation of the age-long agreement of advancement and relevance cut with his predecessors.

    Just as Oba Ademola Elegushi, fate singled-out youthful Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi for rulership of Ile-Ife as the Ooni. The new Ooni, a self-made and hardworking youngman, is not just expected to steer the affairs of Ile-Ife as seamlessly as the enigmatic and stylish Oba Okunade Sijuade  (Olubuse II),  he also has a divine mandate to fosterthe unity of the Yoruba race.

    Oba Ogunwusi’s ascension to the supreme throne of Ooni comes with huge responsibilities. His tasks are  herculean  and compounded by some deep cultural issues  with complicated age-long rivalry amongst  Yoruba  Kings. But in his ‘youthful’ wisdom, the Ojaja II from Giesi Ruling House has signalled the birth a new Yoruba race with his unscheduled visit to the Alafin of Oyo, Oba Lamidi Olayiwola Adeyemi on his 45th coronation anniversary. As the first Ooni to visit Oyo town since 1937, it is clear that the Arole Odua is a different kind of king and a man ofgreat wisdom.  Ooni Adeyeye is a youthful royal father gifted with the wisdom of King Solomon, like his royal brother, Oba Saheed Ademola Elegushi (Kusenla III).

    Now, Ile-Ife will have more than heritage and Obafemi Awolowo University, my alma mater, as  attractions. With the N7.2bn estate and resort centre which will potentially employ 5,000 indigenes and empower 20, 000 widows, Ooni Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi is turning Ile-Ife into a major tourist attraction.  Should I ask if you perceive the socio-economic development championed by these young kings? Okay, wait till Oba Saheed Ademola Elegushi unfolds his transformational plans for Ikateland in the coming months!

    Iwo town is the new centre of youth empowerment. The newly installed Oluwo of Iwo, His Royal Majesty, Oba Rasheed Adewale Akanbi is another man from this generation of youths who signposts our collective vision to take Nigeria to the next level.  After his coronation, the Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Akanbi (Ilufemiloye Telu1), announced that his reign would take Iwo to the “Promised Land”, and his subjects understood that the ancient town of Iwo has commenced a journey to renaissance.

    This theme vibrates across the land because it is the song on the lips of every Nigerian youth. We need to involve youths more in governance and social administration for better results. Now is the time to take advantage of youthfulness for national growth, economic development and better infrastructure. The energy, resources and knowledge to take Nigeria out of doldrums abound in this generation of youths.

    The soothing wind of transformation is blowing across the land even though the esteemed throne of Olubadan might not immediately be available for manning by a middle-aged man because of the town’s unique traditional system of governance. The route to the throne is hierarchical ascension  from two lineages (Egbe Agba and Egbe Balogun), through alternating system and each lineage has 23 positions before the throne.

    From the records, it takes between 38 and 40 years, for a Mogaji (thenext-in-line to the Olubadan) to become an Olubadan, and progression to Mogaji also takes about 40 years too. Therefore, the probability of a young man being king over Ibadan is slim. However, with Chief Abiodun Kola Daisi, the Ekarun Olubadan, rumoured ceding of his position to one of his sons who is a little over 40, Ibadan might just be getting ready for an unusually young Olubadan. This indicates belief in the capacity of this generation of youths to lead transformation, and champion developmental initiatives.

    The young Elegushi of Ikateland, Oba Saheed Ademola Elegushi, (Kusenla III), has proven through his conducts that youthfulness is an ingredient of social development.  Arole Odua, Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi, the Ooni of Ife showed the world that this generation is about peace, progress and unity. Just within that frame, the Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Rasheed Adewale Akanbi amplified the aspiration of every Nigerian youth to turn Nigeria into the promised land.

    Except we want to shy away from the truth, culture is more delicate and complex than governance, and youths are acting as better custodians and harbingers of our traditions. I reckon that for Nigeria to record the long-sought transformation that will bring happiness to every citizen, youth empowerment and involvement in social administration, might just be the key.

    • Fafure writes from Lagos. 
  • Ooni, Afenifere Renewal Group call for Yoruba unity

    The Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi Ojaja II, and the Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG) have called for unity among the Yoruba.

    The frontline monarch spoke at his palace in Ile-Ife, Osun State, when he hosted During ARG members.

    Oba Ogunwusi said peace was an essential nutrient that would help Nigeria and the Yoruba race to grow.

    The monarch noted that one of the major things he set to achieve during his reign is unity among the Yoruba, adding that peace would be achieved when Yoruba leaders work together.

    He said: “I have been praying to God for unity among the Yoruba race and in the land because our unity is germane to the progress of the world. The Yoruba are gifted and will always make impact anywhere they go. Now, there is a challenge about who will make sacrifices by leading others to resolve crisis among the Yoruba, mostly as a result of our bravery.

    “Love and unity among the Yoruba will bring about many positive things. It is time for unity to return to Nigeria and we must all return to the source to achieve it. If we forget our source, we may go astray. To bring love, I have decided to work with leaders in Yoruba land.

    “Growth is not difficult in Yoruba land; unity is the challenge. With my emergence, unity is returning to Ife and it is gradually spreading to other places across Yoruba land.”

    The head of ARG delegation Olawale Oshun said the focus of the meeting was to look into how unity could return to Yoruba land and the development the race should witness during Oba Ogunwusi’s tenure.

    Oshun urged traditional rulers to work for peace among the Yoruba in the country and in the Diaspora.

    He said: “It is important that across the Yoruba-speaking area there should be unity. When there is unity, there will be peace and when there is peace, you can facilitate development.

    “We are interested in the development of our people. We want to stop managing rancour; we want to manage development and growth. We want peace – and not rancour – to enhance positive things.”

     

  • ‘It’s time for Yoruba to honour Tinubu’

    ‘It’s time for Yoruba to honour Tinubu’

    A pressure group, Yoruba-Home and in the Diaspora Initiative (YOHID),  has urged Yoruba people to honour the National Leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, for his  selfless contributions.

    The group, in a communiqué issued after its meeting in Lagos  by its coordinator, Prince Peter Oyeleye Fasua, and secretary, Mr. Tunde Fajimbola, said Tinubu as an agent of change, is a transformational political leader who has been championing the cause of possibilities.

    “Besides, he has helped bring the Yoruba race to a strategic reckoning in the affairs of this country, to the extent that no Yoruba man can claim that his race is marginalised in any way.

    “For such a man who is never discouraged, who has been spending his money, resources and time to ensure that the Yoruba race is lifted to a heroic status in the politics of the Nigerian nation is spectacular.

    “Here is a man who has helped everyone to one political victory or the other, to various appointments and elevation; yet he has refused to go for any position or contest for anything. Therefore, the best the Yoruba race can give back to him in appreciation is to openly celebrate him by dedicating monuments, institutions and Foundations in his honour,” the group prodded.

    It continued: “A race without the guidance of a star will miss its way in darkness. It’s time for the Yoruba to open eyes and recognise the guidance star for its race. We have recognised this star in Asiwaju!”

    “We are, therefore, determined to help open the eyes of Yoruba-Home and in the Diaspora to see our guidance star: Asiwaju,” the group explained.

    Reacting to current agitations in some quarters for the sovereignty of a Biafra state, the group called for caution, saying the various ethnic groups in Nigeria have become inter-twined through marriages, business transactions and sundry investments outside their aboriginal locations.

    It, therefore, called on the Federal Government to bring those agitating to a roundtable for rapprochement, stressing, “our strength as a country lies in our big size.”

  • Desperate challenges facing Yoruba South-west

    One of the major foibles of Nigeria’s development management since independence is that Nigeria’s federal rulers generally prefer to adopt an integrationist attitude to the issues of development.  Every group that somehow steps into the control of the Federal Government assumes that it has been given the duty and authority to micro-manage all development issues and all sections of Nigeria.

    Such an integrationist stance ignores the huge size of Nigeria as well as Nigeria’s intense diversity in geography, people, culture, history, levels of development, people’s orientations, desires and development choices, etc. Each people, region and section of Nigeria has its own package of development challenges, and each package evolves along a logic and trajectory of its own, and keeps perpetually producing its own peculiar kinds of new challenges. In the final analysis, therefore, the aggressive integrationist orientation of our federal rulers has been wasteful and foolish, and it has generated enormous waste and discord. In fact, to spell out fully how foolish, wasteful and destructive it has been, one would need to write a whole book – a book that could become a worldwide text on how to lead a country to failure.

    But the theme of this column today is not the folly and destructiveness of the Federal Government’s mismanagement of Nigeria but the peculiar and urgent development needs of the South-west region of Nigeria. The Southw-est came into the 20th Century and into Nigeria as the most developed part of tropical Africa. Its defining strength was its urbanism, with towns and cities at short distances from one another, a situation that did not exist in any other part of tropical Africa. Partly because of this, what is now the South-west of Nigeria was better able to absorb and utilize the incoming transformations at the beginning of the 20th Century. There were already schools in probably most Yoruba towns by 1900. In fact, Yoruba people had been producing new college-educated elite in Engineering, Law, Accountancy, Medicine and so on. By 1859 Yorubaland already, had a newspaper and by the end of the century, there were newspapers in many Yoruba towns. Yoruba authors had written books in various subjects all the way from History to Fiction to the Sciences etc. Then in the 1950s, a peculiarly business-like regional government pulled the South-west much further ahead still. Fortunately also, the Yoruba had a culture that respected the religious choices of individuals and accepted and included people from any other culture of the world.

    The consequence of all these, as Nigeria has declined since independence and as poverty has intensified all over the country, is that people have been fleeing from all parts of Nigeria to the South-west. Within only the past few decades, many Yoruba towns and cities have become almost unrecognizable as a result of rapid increases in population. Most who come, do so because of what they believe to be abundant opportunities waiting for them in the South-west. But sadly, many of them are now discovering that the opportunities are not as abundant as they expected. The level and intensity of poverty in the South-west is becoming frightful. Many Yoruba towns are losing all of urban beauty and many parts of many cities are simply growing slums. The crowds of young people peddling little handfuls of articles in the streets represent an underemployed mass.

    In a better managed federation with more sensitive leaders, a region that comes under such bombardment would be considered for special input and assistance by the Federal Government. However, nobody who knows Nigeria would ever expect that Nigeria’s Federal Government will make such special considerations for the South-west or any other part of Nigeria. The summary then is that the South-west is being asked to bear a burden it is unable to bear, and the result of this is that the quality of life in the South-west is deteriorating rapidly.

    Of course, we in the South-west have a lot to criticize our state and local governments for but the bigger problem is from the federal source. This bigger problem is not merely that the Federal Government will not help the South-west, but that in fact they are forever trying to hold the South-west back. The examples of federal efforts to hold the South-west back are legion and the result is that life is being made difficult not only for the people of the South-west but for the millions flooding in from other parts of Nigeria.

    There is no point asking anything of the Federal Government. A new situation has arisen now, however, in which the party holding power at the centre may be fairly reasonably expected to relate more sensibly and more productively to the South-west than ever before. We in the South-west are expecting and waiting for that to happen and hopefully it will happen. But even if it happens, the main burden is still on us the people of the South-west, our state and local governments and the traditional Yoruba institutions that served the interest of our communities.

    The first direction we must go is to make our masses of educated youths seriously productive members of society. By our youths I do not only mean the indigenous Yoruba youths but all youths. We need without further delay to establish programmes whereby our youths will be equipped with modern job skills in various directions as artisans, machinists, modern farm hands and farm managers, builders, plumbers, masons, computer operatives and so on. We need to empower some of our businesses to offer such training in-house. We also need to encourage private individuals who are interested in contributing to education to participate in the establishment of technical and skills institutes. Side by side with these skills, our youths need to be educated to be good workers – loyal to their employers, ambitious for the companies they work for and dependable in the performance of their duties.

    The investment world out there is already interested in the South-west, but the fear is that the workers are not there. If we could create the skilled and dependable workers, we could turn our fortunes around in just a few years. Then we need to dig deep into the resources of our culture in order to carry out this transformation. We must assist those of our people already in small businesses to improve the quality of their services. An American who travelled widely in the South-west recently remarked that the small business culture (not just in trading) already exists and is an ancient culture with the Yoruba people. For example, he pointed out that if public authorities would assist the countless thousands of Yoruba women who cook food for sale in ‘bukas’, this industry could attract a lot of foreigners to the South-west.

    The South-west also has one of the richest resources for cultural tourism on earth. This is an industry that people of the South-west can develop at little expense. Thirdly, the Yoruba produce a whole range of traditional products, garments, fabrics and works of art which is another area which the governments of the South-west should look into. Moreover, Yoruba women have the reputation of being, in history, some of the greatest traders on the African continent – another area in which their governments should help them to improve and modernize.

    The summary is this. The people of the South-west command the capabilities and the means to transform their region and to help Nigeria to pull ahead. Those who hold the reins of power in the region owe their people and the world the duty of attending to all these possibilities without delay. That is the challenge of the Southwest today. The situation can be changed quickly and radically. But if we delay, it can become too complicated to handle. Nobody can stop the many millions coming to the South-west. The onus is on the South-west to seek urgently to command the strength to accept and include them constructively.

  • When ‘ll Yoruba have another Awo?

    When ‘ll Yoruba have another Awo?

    As the nation celebrates the passage of Yeyeoba Hannah Dideolu Awolowo, Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU reflects on the life and times of her husband, Chief Obafemi Awolowo the political colossus, who has remained the pathfinder and role model to progressives.  

    Twenty eight years after his death, he remains a household name. His legacies have endured. His good works have constantly reminded the people that a great leader had passed through the political firmament. Before and after his death, he has remained the main issue in politics.

    His achievements as the premier of the defunct Western Region and war-time Federal Commissioner for Finance have remained the benchmark for successive administrations. Young ideologues in search of heroes perceive him as a mentor and role model. Every day, references are made to his indelible contributions. To his adversaries and conservative rivals,  he was a tribal champion and symbol of ethnic politics. But, to his admirers, he was a foremost nationalist and man of ideas deliberately under-utilised by a beleaguered nation-state thirsty for transformation.

    While Former military President Ibrahim Babangida described the indomitable Chief Jeremiah Obafemi Oyeniyi Awolowo as the main issue in Nigeria’s politics, former Biafran warlord, the late Dim Chukwuemeka Odimegwu-Ojukwu, described him as the best President Nigeria never had. However,  the dark side of the post-Awolowo era is that the political machinery he built is in now in disarray. Awoists are now scattered across some political parties like sheep without shepherd. Things have continued to fall apart and the centre cannot hold. The political idea subsists, but the men and women on the field in the Awoist political vineyard are at loggerheads. They are not divided by the idea, but by conflicting approaches to the targeted goal.

    Awo’s road to fame was rough. His personal style of self-confidence, intolerance of injustice and avowed commitment to principle also made life uncomfortable for him. A historian, Insa Nolte, noted that whole Awolowo continues to be admired for his steadfastness today, it did not always make life easy for him. It is an understatement. As Nolte recalled, when Awolowo asked the wealthy Ijebu-ode merchant and NYM leader, Timothy Odutola, to finance his UK law degree, he framed his request as a business proposition. “Refusing to acknowledge his position as a hard-up young man from a small Remo town when he was addressing one of the most prominent citizens of Ijebu-Ode, Awolowo’s leeter was astonishingly irreverent and, perhaps, not surprisingly, unsuccessful. It ended with a precis, both of his proposal and his own sense of merit”. Awo wrote to Odutola: “You have my request before you, and thee reasons why I make the request, It is left to you to decide whether it is worth your while to take the risk of helping me in the manner outlined above or not.” To the wealthy man, the letter smacked of arrogance.

    Awolowo was a man of many parts. He was a teacher, stenographer, journalist, produce buyer, philosopher, author, and nationalist politician. He came into limelight as the irrepressible secretary of the Nigeria Youth Movement (NYM), Ibadan branch, at the same time when the late Chief Ladoke Akintola was Lagos NYM secretary. He had acquired a bachelor’s degree in Commerce through private study before travelling to London to study Law at the School of Economics and Political Science. He was the moving spirit behind the formation of Egbe Omo Oduduwa, which later metamorphosided into the Action Group (AG).  In 1947, he released his book, ‘Path to Nigeria’s Freedom,’ which is contains panacea to the multi-ethnic challenges, which give clear expression to the core national questions critical to the survival of the fledging federation.

    Awo took off as a grassroots politician. He had a base. The Ilishan-born politician started elective political career as a councillor in old Remo District Council presided over by the Akarigbo, Oba Christopher Williams Adedoyin. Like his colleagues, who were pioneer members of the Western Regional House of Assembly, he became a legislator at a time when township associations and unions serve as political platforms. However, when AG was formed, these legislators, many of who were members of Egbe Omo Oduduwa, and some who had intimate relationship with Dr. Nnamidi Azikiwe’s National Council of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC), formally joined AG on the floor. When AG commanded the majority in the House, Awo became the Leader of Government Business and Minister of local Government.

    As Premier of Western Region, Awolowo presided over a dynamic, path-finding and productive administration that was second to none in Africa. His free education programme gave the region a head start. Two years after ZIk replicated it in the Eastern Region, he retraced his steps due to failure. Awo tarred more roads in Western Region within eight years more than the British did in forty years. At a time France did not have a television station, Western Region had opened a station at Ibadan, the capital. Cocoa House, Liberty Stadium, schools, farm settlements, hospitals sprung up. Before he left for the House of Representatives in 1960, paper work on the proposed university of Ife was ready.

    Awo was aided by the cabinet of talents he assembled. He had the vision of building AG, which was one of the best organised parties in Africa,  to rival foremost democratic socialist parties in Europe and America. While alive, Awo’s camp was not for the feeble-minded and intellectually lazy elements who suffered from ideological malnutrition. Foremost Awoists were therefore, competent experts in diverse fields ready to devote and deploy their talents, wit and energy towards the propagation and furtherance of AG causes and implementation of its laudable programmes as encapsulated in its slogan of ‘Freedom for All, Life More Abundant’. The careers of these disciples blossomed, with Awo serving as their collateral assets during electioneering.

    As the Leader of Opposition in the Federal Parliament, Awo and other AG members and their allies were like sheep among wolves. He proffered the alternative route to national greatness, but his suggestions were ignored to the country’s peril. Unable to withstand his power of logic, he was roped into a ‘coup plot’ and jailed for treason. A pall of darkness enveloped the nation for four years. By the time he left jail, leading actors who arranged his imprisonment had been consumed by the effects of inferno they engineered.

    Awo met Yorubaland in turmoil as members of the farmers’ union, “Agbekoya” was on rampage. The Odemo of Isara, Oba Samuel Akinsanya had been chased out of his palace. The Soun of Ogbomoso, Oba Jide Olayide, was not that lucky. Awo promptly restored order into the state of pandemonium. Yoruba elite were impressed by that outstanding performance, and during the preparations for the ad-hoc conference, he was nominated by the late Chief Adeniran Ogunsanya for the honorary position of ‘Asiwaju of Yoruba’. Later, as Finance Minister and Vice Chairman of Federal Executive Council under Gowon Administration, he successfully managed the war economy. Before the administration derailed, he had called it quits. In 1979 and 2003, he lost the presidential contest  to Alhaji Shehu Shagari. In May 1987, he bade Nigeria farewell.

    However, cracks have appeared before the wall before Awo died. The first test was the split in the AG in 1962, when Awo and Akintola could not agree on principle. It was evident that, though AG leaders believed in the same principles, they differed on how to attain the goal. Tension brewed between the protagonists of mainstream politics, represented by Akintola, Chief Ayotunde Rosiji, Oba Cladius Akran, Chief Adisa Akinloye and others  and Awo, Enahoro, Chief Ohu Akin-Olugbade, Alhaji Soroye Adegbenro, Dr. Samuel Ikoku, Chief Bola Ige and others who loathed fraternity with the conservative forces. Efforts to find a common ground failed woefully. Ahead of the critical party congress in Jos, Awo and Akintola’s friend, Canon Emmanuel Alayande, the AG chaplain, had in a letter admonished the Party Leader to demonstrate “extreme sacrifice and self-abnegation”, adding that Awo should be less inflexible and more condescending. The appeal came too late. The struggle within the fold led to polarisation and parting of ways in the Jos Convention, with dire consequences for political unity and national progress.

    In the Second Republic, old allies had deserted Awo in droves. When he resigned from Gowon government, it was curious that his associates; Chief Anthony Enahoro and Joseph Tarka, stayed on in the cabinet. In 1979, when UPN was formed, the seats of Enahoro, Akin-Olugbade, Ikoku, Toye Coker, Akanbi Onitiri and Tarka were vacant. Enahoro, Ikoku and Onitiri, who were heroes of the treasonable felony trial had gone to NPN, PRP and NPP. However, in their new parties, they did not fire any salvo at their former leader. Also, in Remoland, two promising lieutenants; Chief Ola Yesufu and Chief Olu Awotesu; quarreled with him over the Constituent Assembly election of 1978. Awo, who had declined to participate in the constitution making exercise, supported  Chief Awoniyi. But Yesufu and other Awolowo boys supported Awotesu who defeated Awoniyi, the candidate of Awolowo. Reflecting on the incident in his memoir, Yesuf said that Awo later discouraged them from joining his party, UPN, when it was being formed and he and other ‘rebels’ joined NPN.

    In 1983, Awo’s camp was further decimated by the internal struggle for power. Deputy governors and commissioners led onslaughts against governors ahead of the governorship nominations. When the five UPN governors; Adekunle Ajasin (Ondo State), Bola Ige (Oyo), Bisi Onabanjo (Ogun), and Ambrose Ali (Bendel) and Lateef Jakande (Lagos) won nominations again, hell was let lose in the party. At that critical stage when Awolowo was seeking the highest office for the last time, he was deserted by hitherto trusted allies, including Chiefs Akin Omoboriowo, Sunday Afolabi, Soji Odunjo, Busari Adelakun, Joel Babatola, Olawumi Falodun, and Sikiru Shitta-Bey.

    Before his passage, a succession battle had started among core loyalists, especially Jakande, nicknamed ‘Baba Kekere’, Ige, who was described by fans as ‘Arole Awolowo’, and Onabanjo, the veteran journalist with the pen name, ‘Ayekooto’. Out of envy, Ige’s political career was to be liquidated at the UPN congress in Yola, when Adelakun reported his romance with former Military Head of State Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo to the party. Obasanjo had waded into the conflict between the former governor and his deputy, Afolabi. To the UPN, that amounted to anti-party activity. Awo saved Ige during that night of long knives. When Onabanjo died, his family complained that the testimony of a top UPN member before the military tribunal made the military to send him to prison where his health suffered.

    However, when Awo died, the mantle of leadership fell on the First Republic federal parliamentarian, Ajasin, who in 1966 was the last President of Egbe Omo Oduduwa. This did not go down well with some young turfs who continue to hold meetings in the Ikenne home of the late sage because they felt that the widow, Yeyeoba Hannah Dideolu Awolowo, should lead the political family.

    Of course, Awo’s children had exhibited the same feeling, but their argument was ignored. In Lagos, when his last born, Dr. Tokunbo Dosunmu, aspired for the governorship of Lagos, she was rebuffed by Jakande, who said he was not ready to serve father and daughter in quick succession.

    At a ceremony in Ibadan, Oluwole Awolowo, had also canvassed the dynasty route to power, wondering why Nigeria refused to take after India and other Asian countries, which gave permission for political authority to flow from one family for generations. In reaction, Ajasin, who fired back, queried; “Is any of them deep enough for political leadership?”. Of course, circumstances made Ajasin as the natural successor to Awolowo at a critical time in history when the military chose to toy with the destiny of the country.

    It appeared that Awo’s men were in a hurry to embrace the dubious transition programme of babangida Administration, contrary to the sage’s counsel. Awo had warned his camp to dine with IBB, the evil genius, with a long spoon. When the Political Bureau chaired by Dr Cookey set out, Awo declared that the country had embarked on a fruitless search for democracy, stressing that when they imagined that the new order had arrived, they would be terribly disappointed.  To avoid the danger of political exclusion, Awo’s disciples participated in the prolonged exercise which culminated into the annulment of the most credible presidential election won by the late business mogul, Moshood Abiola. Ajasin died during the imbroglio. The mantle of Afenifere leadership fell on Senator Abraham Adesanya, a staunch National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) chieftain and man of principle and honour.

    Predictably, Awo’s camp rejected the interim contraception led by Chief Ernest Shonekan. However, the group somersaulted when two foremost members, Jakande and Ebenezer Babatope, former UPN Director of Organisation, were accepted ministerial appointments under Abacha regime, following persuasion by Abiola, who deluded himself into thinking that the military would hand over power to him. When representatives of Yoruba race asked them to resign at the historic Ibadan conference, they turned a deaf ear, because, as it was later rationalised, it was dangerous to pull out. However, when the tempest was over in 1998, Jakande and Babatope, who had been kicked out of the cabinet, could not be re-admitted into the Afenifere, the pan-Yoruba socio-political group, where Awolowo aides called the shots. In the absence of the time-tested culture and machinery for reconciliation in the fold, the door was effectively shot at them. Babatope joined PDP and Jakande, who first stayed in APP, and later another mushroom party, could not regain his lost political influence.

    However, Afenifere/Alliance for Democracy (AD) did not fare better.  When its 23 wise men selected by Adesanya, Ige, Adebanjo, Olaniwun Ajayi, Solanke Onasanya and other elders converged on D’Rovans, Hotel,  Ibadan, little did they guess that their action would forever affect the future of the group. Then, the presidential ticket was zoned to the Southwest, apparently to placate the zone for Abiola’s demise and accord it a sense of belonging.  Confidence and trust were cripples among the men of the old order who were to choose between Ige, former AG National Publicity Secretary and Olu Falae, former Secretary to Federal Military Government and Finance Minister. It was not clear why Ige decided to travel out during the shadow poll through collegiate system. When he was rejected by his colleagues in preference for Falae, he cried foul, saying that it was the second fall of man. Apparently to spite them, he accepted a ministerial appointment under President Olusegun Obasanjo. His colleagues said he was on his own. Although plans to suspend him as the deputy leader of the group was mooted, Adesanya objected to the idea. In Ondo and Ekiti, two progressive politicians; Mrs. Mobolaji Osomo and Chief. S.K. Babalola, left AD for PDP, saying that the governorship primaries were conducted in a manner that edged them out.

    Promptly, there was renewal of old rivalries in the Awolowo political family. Two Afenifere chieftains; Venerable Alayande and Justice Adewale Thompson; rejected Adesanya’s leadership of Afenifere and they became President and secretary of Yoruba Council of Elders (YCE), which people thought had the backing of Ige. “is it because we asked him (Adesanya) to carry the gown of Dingle Foot that he now sees himself as Yoruba leader?”, Alayande queried.

    Ige, who was bitter, decided to wield more influence in AD, having lost the confidence of the Ijebu Igbo mafia, which Wale Oshun described as the “controlling Leadership” of Afenifere.  He anointed Ahmed Abdulkadir as the national chairman. Lam Adesaina and Bisi Akande, governors of Oyo and Osun States also sponsored Michael Koleoso for the deputy chairmanship, thereby robbing Adebanjo the chance of bouncing back to the position. Adebanjo, Dawodu, Okunrohunmu bloc queued behind Ambassador Tanko Yusuf as chairman.

    The state chapters of Afenifere/AD were also not at peace. Remarkably, many politicians who did not believe in Awo credo had joined the Afenifere/AD to realise their ambitions. But even among the old order, there were suspicions. In Osun, Akande and his deputy, Iyiola Omisore, were locked in a war of attrition. In Lagos, former Governor Bola Tinubu and his deputy, Senator Kofoworola Akerele-Bucknor, never saw eye to eye. in Ondo, the 2003 governorship battle had divided Governor Adebayo Adefarati, Health Commissioner Olusegun Mimiko and dr. Akerele Adu. In Ekiti, there were frictions between Governor Niyi Adebayo and two Afenifere chieftains; Dayo Adeyeye, national publicity secretary and Funminiyi Afuye. Fed up with the protracted crises, Afenifere advised deputy governors who could not cope with their bosses to resign. Omisore and Bucknor later went to PDP.

    Reconciliation and crisis solution are usually difficult in Afenifere. As Ige and Adebanjo/Ajayi were fighting at the national level of AD/Afenifere, Tinubu and Dawodu were fighting a battle of supremacy in Lagos AD. Dawodu wanted to retain his seat as party chairman, but Tinubu, who wanted a second term ticket, acted fast. He urged Dawodu to accept appointment as chairman of two big parastatals and yield the ground to Abiodun Ogunleye. Dawodu refused. two parallel congresses were held in Lagos, but the electoral commission gave recognition to Ogunleye leadership.

    Two Afenifere chieftains had warned that the group was running out of ideas. Former Foreign Affairs Minister Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi and another diplomat, Dr Dapo Fafowora, who had joined the fold, bowed out. They were surprised that Afenifere was not adapting to modern trends and ideas in this age of dynamism. “Nigeria and Africa have been plagued with the tensions arising from making a transition from political systems dominated by founding fathers to systems managed by first among equals’, noted Akinyemi, whose father, Canon Akinyemi, was an AG regional and federal legislator.

    Others in ige’s camp were later to allude to double standard in the fold, for while Senator Cornelius Adebayo, a non-AD member of Afenifere, was appointed minister by Obasanjo, criticisms by Afenifere did not trail his acceptance of the slot, unlike when Ige accepted similar offer. Also, some people felt that the former secretary, Ayo Opadokun, was asked to vacate his position for fracternising with former ANPP Kwara State Governor Mohammed Lawal, pointing out that the punishment was rather too harsh by the same organisation that approved of a pact with PDP President Obasanjo. Instructively, as crisis polarised Afenifere/AD, politicians who had come on board in 1998/99 because of the group’s popularity left for the PDP, citing the crisis in the party as reason. Among them are Senator Adeseye Ogunlewe, Senator Wahab Dosunmu, Mrs. Patricia Etteh, Hon. Onimole and Sunday Fajimi.

    Adesanya saw danger coming ahead of 2003 polls, urging a truce in Lagos. That was in post-Ige era, the colourful politician having been assassinated in December 2001. The Ajayi Committee, which was set up suggested a 60:40 formula for distribution of appointive and elective offices. It was turned down by Tinubu/Hamzat/Ogunleye/ camp. Dawodu ‘pulled’ out of AD, but Tinubu won re-election, making people to now embrace the fact that, with or without Afenifere, political success was still possible in Lagos.  Although Afenifere backed other governors, they all lost their deposits to the curious pact sealed between them and Obasanjo, with Afenifere as witness. AD, owing to this understanding, did not field a presidential candidate in 2003.

    Shortly after the 2003 elections, the crisis deepened as AD prepared for national convention. Now, Ige’s camp had split, with Akande and Senator Mojisolowa Akinfenwa, slugging it out. Afenifere leadership and Obasanjo government backed Akinfenwa, but the five AD governors supported Akande. At separate conventions in Abuja and Lagos, Akinfenwa and Akande emerged as factional chairmen. When Adesanya died, the Acting Leader of Afenifere, Chief Rueben Fasoranti, inherited the crisis. However, at the Akure meeting of the group, Fasoranti, declared Akinfenwa as the authentic AD national chairman, claiming that the convention that produced him appeared to have satisfied laid down requirement.

    AD was seized by tension. The party was finally balkanised. Akande/Tinubu/Osoba/Adebayo forces rejected the ‘Akure Declaration’. However, by the time a High Court pronounced Koleoso as the authentic chairman, Ad had become a shadow of itself. Tinubu and other governors, except Adefarati, formed Action Congress (AC) and other Afenifere leaders floated Democratic Peoples Alliance (DPA). Then, the battle shifted to Afenifere, he umbrella group. Tinubu, Adesina, Akande, Osoba, Olabiyi Durojaye and Niyi Adebayo rejected Fasoranti’s leadership and proclaimed Senator Ayo Fasanmi, who is based in Osogbo, as the Deputy Leader in succession to the late Bola Ige. But, Ajayi, Adebanjo, Okunrounmu and Falae insisted that Fasoranti was appointed by Adesanya to deputise for him before he passed on, based on the counsel of Adeyeye and Afuye, who complained that making another Ijebu or Remo man his deputy would make other sub-Yoruba ethnic groups feel that they lack a sense of belonging.  Both Fasoranti and Fasanmi joined AG in 1951.

    Amid the crisis, Fasoranti announced at a meeting held in Jibowu office of the group that the door of the group was opened to all Yoruba under 18 years, irrespective of political leanings. The decision infuriated some members who believe that believe in the progressives ideas of Awo should have been the baseline for recruiting new members.

    The 2007 governorship contest also took its toll on the group.  Ahead of the general elections, Niyi Owolade and Adeyeye called it quits and teamed up with the PDP in protest against the handling of governorship primaries in Osun and Ekiti states. During the funeral of Adesanya in Ijebu-Igbo, Fasoranti and Fasanmi factions went to the ancient town to demonstrate their strength. Clerics who officiated at the ceremony shook their heads for Afenifere, which had completely lost its cohesion, unity and peace.

    When it appeared that the two Afenifere factions would not close ranks, concerned young men and women who had looked up to them for direction and leadership decided to regroup under Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG). The group led by Oshun, former Social Democratic Party (SDP) Chief Whip of House of Representatives brokered peace, but without success. The Ibadan retreat, which was organised for that purpose, failed to achieve the goal of reconciling the two factions. Key members of the two factions appreciated the need for reconciliation, but they backed their dream of unity with hypocritical commitment.

    On the eve of the reconciliation meeting called Yeyeoba Awololo, Fasanmi’s group stormed Ikenne, tendering reasons why key members would not be able to attend the meeting. Adesina and Olusi were asked to represent the group at the meeting. The meeting failed to achieve truce. Although the 80th birthday of Adebanjo provided another opportunity for both camps to come together, the inflammatory  interview by the celebrator angered Tinubu and Osoba because the octogenarian put the blame for the crisis in Afenifere on the two former governors, who he described as new comers into the fold who did not know Awolowo. Returning the missile, Osoba reminded Adebanjo of his contributions to the progressive cause in the country as a journalist, stressing that, though he may be his senior in the Awolowo political family, he was very close to the late sage who had categorised him, Peter Ajayi and Felix Adenaike as the three media musketeers.

    In 2011, Afenifere finally lost its grip and influence. The Controlling Leadership, which had become an ally of the PDP governor of Ogun State, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, supported the governor’s candidate on a new platform outside PDP. When Akande, Tinubu, Osoba, Adesina, Adebayo, Durojaye, Hamzat, Olusi, Koleoso, Rafiu Ogunleye, Gbenga Kaka and others were locked in battle with the PDP for the soul of the Southwest, the absence of the Afenifere Controlling Leadership was not felt.

    Today, what unites Awoists are not Afenifere or any political group, but the yearly post-humus birthday of the revered sage and activities of Awolowo Foundation set up to immortalise him. Personal interest has often displaced collective interest in post-Awolowo era. But Awo lives on in the minds of the people, nation and country he served diligently for almost 60 years of active politics. Also, his ideas are imperishable, serving as guide to progressives. They also evoke passion and loyalty arising from what Prof. Akinyemi described as “fond memories of freedom for all, life more abundant; a lasting benefit of this being free education”.

    But, Awolowo added more value to politics through his moral values. For example, Babatope noted in his book, “Awo and Nigeria-Setting the records straight”, that the old man had admonished his to flee from corruption. “When you are in government, do not enjoy all those things you will be able to afford while out of office”, said Awo, who shunned the use of sirens, official government quarters , cars and travelling ecstacode or foreign travelling allowances  while in public office. In fact, when former Governor Ali made use of public money for his father’s burial, the UPN leader frowned at it and directed that he should refund the money to government’s coffers.

    Born on March 6, 1909, Awolowo passed on on May 9, 1987. He founded Nigerian Tribune in 1949. He was Pro-Chancellor of University of Ife, named after him, and Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. In 1976, be became a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). He was the Asiwaju of Yoruba, Asiwaju of Remo, Losi of Ikenne, Apesin of Osogbo, Odole of Ife, Ajagunla of Ado-Ekiti, Odofin of Owo, and Obong Ikpan Ibong of Ibiobioland. In 1982, he was given the highest national honour, the Grand Commander of the Order of the Federal Republic (GCFR).

    Awoloeo disciples, associates and members of Awo political family still alive include Jakande, Adebanjo, Sir Olaniwun Ajayi, Fasanmi, Fasoranti, Professors C.O Taiwo, Akin Mabogunje, David Oke, Banji Akintoye, Muyiwa Igbalajobi, Hon. George Sadiku, Tayo Soyode, Akande, Akinfenwa, Adesina, Koleoso, Olusi, Segun Adegoke, Adu, Rafiu Jafojo, Ehinafe Babatola, Osoba, Opadokun, Sesan Soluade, Dr. Bolarinwa Balogun, Okunrounmu, Adegbonmire, Alhaji Karimu Laka-Orelope, Hamzat, Alebiosu, Babatope and wife, Biola, Akin Omojola, Olorunfunmi Basorun, Bimbo Awofeso, Supo Sonibare, Femi Lanlehin, Tunde Onakoya, S.K Kolawole, Olawale Idris and Willy Akinlude.

     

  • Yoruba elders congratulate Ooni

    Yoruba elders congratulate Ooni

    The Yoruba Council of Elders has congratulated the Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi.

    The group, in a letter by its President, Maj.-Gen. Robert Adebayo and Secretary Idowu Sofola (SAN), recalled Ogunwusi’s achievements in the corporate world.

    “With profound felicity, we wish you a long, peaceful and eventful reign following your feat as a successful tycoon and your notable contributions to the corporate world.

    “We have no doubt that the people of Ile-Ife and indeed the Yoruba race will be extremely blessed by your reign.

    “We are convinced that your time will bring growth and development to Ile-Ife, Osun State and the Yoruba nation.

    “We urge you to do your best to ensure fairness, justice, unity, peace and harmony among the Yoruba race and Nigeria.

    ‘’We urge that you never relent in championing the cause of the common man and the betterment of their lives at all times,” the group said.

  • Unity Summit: another theatrics in Yoruba politics 3

    Unity Summit: another theatrics in Yoruba politics 3

    If those promoting the recommendations of Jonathan’s conference want the support of citizens in the Yoruba region, this will be a good time to start consultations with those whose lives are likely to be affected should such recommendations become the basis for a new federal constitution.

    In the last twenty years, the Yoruba have gotten together under various auspices to examine the structure of the polity. The exercise leading to the production of the Yoruba Agenda is the most memorable of such efforts. The Yoruba Agenda contains ideas that can be reviewed and improved upon. There may be some things that are no longer applicable and need to be taken out at this Assembly. There may be other issues that need to be considered and added to the position taken by our traditional rulers, elders, professionals, and other patriots when the Yoruba Agenda was put together during the pro- democracy struggle of the 1990s. We need to brainstorm about how to make sure that “the architecture of governance”, to borrow a phrase from Chief EmekaAnyaoku, is designed to strengthen the unity of the country through a constitutional system that favours restoration of regional autonomy that made it possible for our region to create the largest pool of manpower in sub-Sahara Africa half a century ago. –General Alani Akinrinade, Rtd at the opening of the Yoruba Assembly in Ibadan on August 30, 2012.

    In the last twenty years, the Yoruba have gotten together under various auspices to examine the structure of the polity. The exercise leading to the production of the Yoruba Agenda is the most memorable of such efforts. The Yoruba Agenda contains ideas that can be reviewed and improved upon. There may be some things that are no longer applicable and need to be taken out at this Assembly. There may be other issues that need to be considered and added to the position taken by our traditional rulers, elders, professionals, and other patriots when the Yoruba Agenda was put together during the pro- democracy struggle of the 1990s. We need to brainstorm about how to make sure that “the architecture of governance”, to borrow a phrase from Chief EmekaAnyaoku, is designed to strengthen the unity of the country through a constitutional system that favours restoration of regional autonomy that made it possible for our region to create the largest pool of manpower in sub-Sahara Africa half a century ago. –General Alani Akinrinade, Rtd at the opening of the Yoruba Assembly in Ibadan on August 30, 2012.

    Over the 26 federal countries housing about 40% of the world’s population had used various methods to move from unitary to federal system. Nigeria was one of such countries. Representatives of the three regions that constituted Nigeria adopted through representatives a federal constitution, preparatory to obtaining independence from Britain in 1960. The country remained a functioning federal system until the emergence of military rule, under which the country lost its federal constitution and was moved gradually from federalism in 1975 to a quasi-federal system in 1999 through a constitution birthed and nurtured by the Abacha-Abubakar 1999 Constitution. The problem facing Nigeria today, according to some Yoruba activists, is how to move Nigeria from its current quasi-federal or quasi-unitary system back to the federal system upon which it became an independent country in 1960. The recent call by some Yoruba leaders and organisations in Ibadan for adoption of recommendations of the Jonathan national dialogue of 2014 is one of the most recent attempts to bring back to the nation’s conversation the issue of restoration of federalism. Today’s piece will conclude discussion of the need to re-start an inclusive process of mobilising citizens for a regional debate on a matter of such importance to all citizens in the region.

    Chief Obafemi Awolowo established a method of making a multilingual and multicultural society adopt a federal political system that many countries had used before him and which many more borrowed from after him. He created a political party that had as part of its core goals, establishment and sustenance of Nigeria as a multicultural federation. Whether it was his Action Group or the Unity Party of Nigeria, Chief Awolowo was consistent in asking for a federal system that promotes equality of majority and minority nationalities. Chief Awolowo did not at any time believe that sustainable federalism could be achieved through a national dialogue that did not have any legal backing nor input from citizens or their representatives. He stated in his speeches and writings that only a duly negotiated federal constitution by representatives of the federating units could lead to a sustainable federal governance. Therefore, the elation of some of his followers at the sudden convocation of a national dialogue of invitees of President Goodluck Jonathan in 2014 would have been an anathema to Chief Awolowo if he were alive, not to talk of the religiosity of some of his former followers in recommendations of a conference of appointed delegates.

    Long after the exit of Awolowo, the Yoruba region in 1993 took part in a protracted struggle against the imposition of military dictatorship on the country after the annulment of the presidential election won by Chief M.K.O. Abiola. Yoruba leaders-traditional and modern-took part in the construction of a list of demands, called the Yoruba Agenda, referred to in the quotation above from General Akinrinade’s address to the Yoruba Assembly in 2012. The major demands of NADECO during the four-year struggle were restoration of Abiola’s electoral mandate and re-federalisation of the country/negotiation for a federal constitution created by representatives of the people.

    It is important for those canvassing for wholesale adoption of recommendations of the national dialogue of 2014 to remember the process of mobilising citizens and their cultural and political leaders during the pro-democracy struggle. Town meetings were held; traditional leaders, professional men and women; and civil society organisations in the Yoruba region were consulted and persuaded to take part in open debates before the document calling for return to a federal system was presented to the public. It is also worth noting that after the death of Abacha and ‘assassination’ of Abiola, many of the Afenifere leaders in NADECO called for participation in the political transition programme initiated by Abacha’s military ruler, General Abdusalam Abubakar. Some of the Afenifere leaders now calling for immediate and wholesale adoption of recommendations of the national dialogue of 2014 were vocal in making cases for an end to  the struggle, promising that once democracy was restored (even without Abiola), the path to federalism would be assured.

    The same narrow band of unelected leaders also pleaded in 2003 for wholesale support of President Obasanjo’s second term. Afenifere leaders discouraged their party from fielding a presidential candidate to contest against the candidate of the PDP, General Obasanjo. Obasanjo, like Jonathan, organised a political reform conference that did not involve citizens’ representatives and the recommendations of which are now in the archive. If those promoting the recommendations of Jonathan’s conference want the support of citizens in the Yoruba region, this will be a good time to start consultations with those whose lives are likely to be affected should such recommendations become the basis for a new federal constitution.

    In many of the countries that had moved from unitary to federal system: Canada, Spain, Germany, and the latest poster-child of devolution, the United Kingdom, the process of demanding shared power and sovereignty had been inclusive. Citizens and their representatives had created and nurtured the process of struggling for federalism. Ethiopia is perhaps the only country that became a federal country by military fiat. And this was after a civil war. No country has been able to shake off an undesirable unitary constitution through press conferences and communiques or by holding on to a document from a conference of appointed delegates.

    If the Yoruba region wants Nigeria to return to a sustainable federal system, its elected and unelected leaders need to stop fighting a civil war over the outcome of Jonathan’s conference. If the party in power in the region does not appear to be sufficiently serious about re-federalising the country, nothing should stop federalists in groups and movements from identifying with any federalist party as it was done in Scotland. But the PDP which President Jonathan led and which did not support him with a covering legislation for the 2014 conference is not a pro-federalism party. Many Yoruba public affairs observers still view the leaders at the recent Ibadan conference as members or supporters of the Jonathan version of PDP.

    Using a political party as a vehicle for struggling for change cannot be avoided or replaced by quarterly or daily communiques. In 2012, a Yoruba Assembly was called in Ibadan at which citizens, civil society organisations in the Yoruba region, and elected representatives in the region agreed to start a Yoruba Constitutional Commission. Most of those calling for a Jonathanian model of federalism or nothing chose to stay away from what was a regional conversation on the type of federal system the Yoruba put before the central government. It is rather too late in the day for individuals to claim they are leaders, if such individuals have not been chosen by citizens, regardless of how brave and honest such self-appointed leaders might be.

    Returning the country to a federal system is important, not only for the Yoruba region but also for Nigeria’s political and economic health. But there is a need for a more inclusive conversation than the one being conducted by Jonathan’s invitees to the 2014 conference. There is nothing wrong with Afenifere calling for federalism. What is not right is narrowing such call to adoption of recommendations of the 2014 conference of delegates handpicked by Jonathan. This is a right time to call another Yoruba Assembly to bring federalists from various political parties and movements together to fashion out how to engage elected representatives of Yoruba people.  Such an assembly can mandate elected representatives of the Yoruba region in state and federal legislatures to table Yoruba demands for a people’s constitution to replace the current military constitution that was designed for administering a quasi-federal Nigeria when revenue from petroleum appeared infinite to military dictators.

  • Yoruba elders and herdsmen

    For sometime now, there has been speculations and reports that following the abduction or kidnapping of Chief Olu Falae, an elder statesman, some Yoruba leaders were contemplating and agitating over what action to take against the Fulani herdsmen in, not only, Ondo State, where the old man was kidnapped but the entire South-west.

    The alleged kidnapping of the former Secretary to the Federal Government and one-time Minister of Finance, by the herdsmen in the first place did surprise not a few Nigerians, in view of the fact that no arrest and interrogation of any herdsman or men were made by anybody, including the Nigeria Police and other security agencies in the country.

    So, a lot of reasonable people did not take this matter of the allegation that the Yoruba ethnic nationality was taking or preparing to take any umbrella decision to expel any herdsmen from any part of Nigeria seriously.  The allegation sounded like a movie.  The best way to handle such long tale was to ignore it in the interest of your time and sanity.

    Otherwise, how could any Nigerian contemplate the expulsion from another part of Nigeria of any Nigerian to another part of it?  What could be the constitutional and national consequence of such an action within the country as a body corporate?  For the sake of argument let’s assume that the wild allegation was true – that it was the herdsmen, six of them that kidnapped the chief. Would the action of these six demented criminals justify the blanket action on the entire herdsmen in the South-west?

    Every tribe, ethnic group has her own share of the good, the bad and the ugly.  And that is why there has never been and there will never be any law that will be enacted to force people as a whole to carry any vicarious liability on behalf of others. People will continue to bear liability for their own actions only – either positive or negative.  This is the standard of any civilized society. People must be assumed to be innocent until proven otherwise.

    One question that has been agitating my mind and I believe most Nigerians is – how did Chief Olu Falae come to the conclusion that it was Fulani herdsmen who kidnapped him?  What incontrovertible evidence did he have or put forward to Nigerians that it was truly the herdsmen that kidnapped him?  To say they dressed like herdsmen or spoke Fulfulde (the Fulani language) or they looked like Fulani was not and shall never be tenable for various reasons.

    Since when did it become a law that only Fulani should speak Fulfulde, dress in any particular clothes or manner?  Under what law did the Fulani get any different colour identity or any other identity that is legally and lawfully exclusive to them as a mark of a tribal identity?

    It is one of the commonest things to find better Fulfulde speakers among the Fulani who are not Fulani.  There are still those who look like the Fulani in all their physical features but are not Fulani. There are also those who dress like the Fulani but are not Fulani especially during cultural festivals.  There are also other tribes that dress like the Yoruba, speak Yoruba fluently, yet they are not Yoruba.  We also have other tribes such as the Berom, Tarok, Shuwa, Mandingo, Tuaregs both local and international who are herdsmen but they are not Fulani.

    Are the Yoruba elders telling us today that the Fulani or their herdsmen who have lived for hundreds of years in Yoruba land who speak the Yoruba language and have become almost entirely absorbed in the Yoruba culture of dress, dance and other Yoruba activities should today go out and commit any criminal activity and the Yoruba as an ethnic group be forced to take a mortal liability for it as a people?  The dress, the language, even the marks (meant to identify different tribes) have failed as the marks of most tribes look alike. As for physical attributes you need to ask people sometimes before you know where they come from or who they are tribally or even ethnically.

    Do we need to remind these respected, educated, enlightened, cosmopolitan and urbane Yoruba elders that the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria clearly spelt out under Section 41(1) thus: “Every citizen of Nigeria is entitled to move freely throughout (my emphasis) Nigeria and to reside in any part thereof, and no citizen of Nigeria shall be expelled from Nigeria or refused entry thereto or exit therefrom”.

    As Nigerians, we must try as hard as possible, no matter, our ethnic, tribal or other differences to respect the laws of the land and refrain from doing anything that can cause ill-feeling, disunity, ethnic or religious crises where it is absolutely dangerous to do so like it is in this case.  There is nowhere that the herdsmen in the South-west in general or Ondo State in particular held any tribal, ethnic or any corporate group meeting where a decision was taken to kidnap Chief Olu Falae or any Yoruba man or woman for that matter.

    It is also true that so far there is no identity parade or security report that identified and verified that it was the herdsmen of the village farm of Olu Falae that kidnapped him.  Even if there were such facts, they would still be subjected to the rigours of our law courts to establish the level of the culpability of such herdsmen, their sponsors, if any, and their motive for such criminal act.

    Even with that, there would not be any vicarious criminal liability on anybody, including the blood relations of such criminals.  It is a very dangerous thing to lump an entire ethnic group together and accuse them of committing a crime that only six crazy and deranged criminals committed. They should be found and fried for their criminal action.

     

    • Bayari, a former national officer of the Myetti Allah Association, sent in this piece from Jos.
  • Yoruba elders warn Fulani herdsmen to leave Southwest

    Yoruba elders warn Fulani herdsmen to leave Southwest

    Yoruba elders yesterday called for an end to the activities of Fulani herdsmen in the Southwest, following the abduction of the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chief Olu Falae, on his farm in Ilado, Akure, Ondo State.

    They made their position known in a communiqué at the end of an emergency summit at the Parliament Building of the Oyo State secretariat complex, Agodi, Ibadan yesterday.

    At the meeting were the President of the Yoruba Council of Elders ( YCE), Gen Adeyinka Adebayo, Sir Olaniwun Ajayi, Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Chief Idowu Sofola, Dr Frederick Fasehun, Bishop Ayo Ladigbolu, Prof Banji Akintoye, Prof Adetowun Ogunseye and Dr Kunle Olajide. They described Falae’s abduction as unacceptable.

    The enraged elders emphasised that failure of the herdsmen to heed their warning could lead to dire consequences.

     In the communiqué read by Olajide, who chairs the Planning Committee, the group also called for the arrest and trial of Falae’s abductors.

    Reiterating that the incessant invasion of farmlands by the herdsmen and subsequent killing of farmers were part of the flawed federal system, the Yoruba leaders restated the call for true federalism and restructuring of the nation to enable each region develop at its own pace.

    The communiqué reads: “Yoruba leaders of thought both at home and in diaspora had an emergency summit in response to the clear and present danger to the continued existence of our people.

    “After an extensive and inclusive debate on the threat to our survival, especially after the unprovoked, unwarranted, mindless and serial attacks on the economic rights of our people by the Fulani cattle rearers which has led to loss of precious lives, rape and criminal abduction of our people.

     “Despite the non aggressive disposition of the Yoruba, we have been victims of violent violations from our hostile neighbours from pre colonial days to modern times.

     “From the 18th century, the Fulani jihadists’ onslaught against the Yoruba through the travails of Chief Obafemi Awolowo through the June 12 saga with the latest wars declared on our people, we have always risen above board as we strive to make our neighbours see the need to deal justly and fairly not because we are cowards but because God created us to fight only as a last resort.

    “Despite the untold injustices meted on us over the years, we remain the only one of the numerous tribes that has ever questioned the corporate existence of Nigeria.

    “Falae’s abduction was sequel to the running battles he has had with these Fulani herdsmen, who had invaded his farmland and destroyed his produce.

     “The return of the herdsmen is a declaration of war on the Yoruba, Falae’s abduction is a continuation of attacks which these herdsmen have unleashed on our people over the years.

    “We cannot afford to leave our people at the mercy of violence of these herdsmen who came to destroy their economic rights and kill them.

    “We demand immediate end to lawless cattle razing in Yorubaland and ask all those who want to engage in cattle business to do animal husbandry, to establish ranches, our people are no longer prepared to allow further encroachment on their farmlands.”

    Governor Abiola Ajimobi decried the ex-Finance minister’s abduction and appealed to the people not to take laws into their hands.

    He, however, warned that our “simplicity as a nation should not be taken for granted”.

    He said: “We are all Nigerians, regardless of tribe and differences. The fight is not between the North and the South but legality against illegality.

    Ajimobi urged the Yoruba to remain law-abiding in the midst of provocation.

    The governor said the time has come to address the issue and ensure peaceful coexistence between the various ethnic groups.

    Ondo State Governor Olusegun Mimiko restated the call for true federalism.

    Mimiko, who was represented by the Commissioner for Environment, Sola Ebiseni, said a situation where a governor cannot appoint a commissioner of police was unacceptable.

    He warned that unless a solution was found to the incessant incursion on farmlands by the Fulani herdsmen, peace might continue to elude the land.

    Gen Adebayo said the Yoruba  must close ranks to fight this cause.

    The YCE chief said: “Our actions have continually pulled us back as a race, we need to close ranks and fight for our common good.”

    Taking his turn, Sir Olaniwun lamented that since Falae’s kidnap and subsequent release, no northerner has openly associated with him.

    “The question is, if it were the other way around, would the nation still be one?”

    Sir Olaniwun urged the governors to come together and shed the toga of politics and affiliation to deliberate on the way forward.

    Also at the summit were Gen Raji Rasaki, factional leader of the Odua Peoples Congress (OPC) Gani Adams and former Police Affairs Minister, Jelili Adesiyan.

  • Yoruba movie practitioners sign MOU

    Yoruba movie practitioners sign MOU

    The Yoruba Video Film Producers Marketers Association of Nigeria, (YOVIFPMAN), and Theater Arts and Motion Picture Association of Nigeria, (TAMPAN), last week signed a Memorandum of Understanding, to work together to get rid of non-professionals in the Yoruba film industry.

    Present at the ceremony were popular Yoruba actor, Adebayo Salami, YOVIFPMAN President, Alhaji Abdullahi Abdulrasaq and TAMPAN President, Mr Dele Odule. The MoU was signed at the YOVIFPMAN secretariat at The Arena, Oshodi, Lagos.

    Speaking at the signing ceremony, Odule said it became necessary to sign the agreement when they discovered that non-professionals were taking over the market.

    “We have done this to appreciate professionalism and drive away mediocrity. If you look at it critically, you will discover that the Yoruba movie producers are marketers have not done too well but these days we cannot differentiate between the professionals and non-professionals. This is why we have decided to come together so that we can do away with the mediocre and be able to identify the professionals,” Odule said.

    He also noted that now that they have signed an MoU, there will be better production from the producers which will in turn lead to acceptability by the marketers and cinemas.