Terrorism, politics and security

Dayo Sobowale

There is a saying that you  cannot eat your cake and still  have it. There is  another one that says you cannot    flee with the hunted  and still  hunt with the hunter. That  to me is the state of global terrorism and democracy in the world today  as events that  happened in the last week  will  show vividly in today’s analysis. For  example in Nigeria there is a security operation by the Nigerian army which  claims it is after ‘ cross  border  bandits ‘ but a Nigerian, lawyer a Senior Advocate  at that, has taken the army to court for violating the fundamental human rights of Nigerians. In  the US   while   the  Impeachment   threatened  American President Donald Trump  gloated gladly  that  the ISIS leader Al Baghdadi  had  been eliminated by the US military,  there  was also  the dark  news  of an  announcement by ISIS that  it has not been eliminated  and  that it is indeed at  the door  step of  Europe something  that anti  immigrant  parties gaining  power in Europe  had been dreading and saying all along. In  Britain, where the Mother of Parliament resides, a No Deal  Brexit  came to pass and give great lie to the braggadocio of British PM Boris  Johnson that Britain will  leave the EU, Deal or  no Deal come October 31,  which  has passed  without any  political  earth quake  or even a  wimp.

In  the case of  human  rights lawyer Femi Falana  SAN there is no doubt  that the powerful human  rights  lawyer  knows  his onions and  his law and he  has  my support in fighting any violation of citizens rights by  not only the army    but also   the Police,   and  he  is right in insisting  that  since there  in no insurrection in  most  parts  of the nation,  the  army should  not  expand  the strategy on identification  it used in Boko Haram infested North East  to the rest of the nation. But  the Nigerian Army is in charge of containing  insurrection against  the Nigerian  state  and does not need to wait till  Boko  Haram  rears its bloody head in any  part of the nation  before  proactively and professionally nipping it in the bud. It  is here then that  I say categorically that Femi  Falana’s  freedom ends where  my  nose, as well as those of millions  of  Nigerians looking for  security   of  life and property,   begins.  We  cannot  be attacking the army  of failure  to  contain Boko  Haram in one  breath  and  in another    breath  be ripping  apart  its security  apparatus and strategy  to kill   the  same Boko Haram bloody  terrorism.  Indeed if  some  stringent  measures  are needed to guarantee security over human rights violations in this  nation, most  Nigerians  would  rather forfeit  such   rights as a price  to pay  for the security of their lives  and property. I ask  Mr  Femi  Falana to take a  drive  round Lagos   and some of our cities  and see the number  of Okada  riders and compare  their attitude  as well as  aggression to both their customers and other  road users and  passing   vehicles,  and  he will  see  some sense  in   expanding the  Identification strategy  of the Nigerian army to contain those it called cross  border bandits  for now, and not Boko Haram  infiltrators   as yet, to other parts  of Nigeria.

In  the  US  where the President  scored a huge anti-terror  goal  in terms of the  killing  of  the  ISIS leader,  that achievement was cut  to size by the decision of the House  Of Representatives to impeach him  after  all. Before  now the Republicans and the White House had said   that  using House Committees to launch  the Impeachment  process  was wrong and that it should  be done in open  house.  In  doing it right this time in open  house the House  of Reps  seem  to  have  admitted that  it put the cart before  the horse  before  and it  has corrected that.  We  should wait  for the legal  implications of that error   in due  course and see  if  that is  a fitting response to  a president  who has just  fulfilled  geopolitically  his election promise  to fight  terrorism  and bring to book  those terrorists terrorizing not only Americans,  but the entire  citizens of  the world as we know it today. Indeed  the US  President can  be said to be fleeing from internal  terrorists in his own  nation given the fact  that  he has changed residence  in his  nation and moved from  Trump  Towers  in   New  York  to his   Florida  home  because the political  leaders of New  York,  both the Governor  and the Mayor,  have been  hostile  to  him  despite  the huge taxes  he had paid  as a New  York  resident over the years.  Yet Trump  is known  not to have  disclosed his tax  returns during   his campaigns  and ever  since.  Another  clear  case of eating your  cake  and having it or  talking from  both sides  of the mouth.

Let  us  now round  up  with the most  exciting    development  of  all  – the  demise of a No  Deal  Brexit    the extension of Britain’s membership   of  the EU and election  in  Britain  by  December 12. In  this scenario the clear loser is the British PM  who  has been  roundly  beaten  to pup  by a Parliament  he abused of having outlived its usefulness.  The  winner, albeit  of a pyrrhic victory is Jeremy  Corbin,   the  Opposition   Leader   who  fought for the  exit  of a No Deal  Brexit before asking for  an election and saw  that strategy through  successfully.  Obviously  the election will  be about  Brexit  and for  some   part    of the electorate an opportunity  to  redress or entrench Brexit.  Xenophobia  was part of the genesis  of Brexit  and that fear and anger will be fuelled further  by the announcement  and reaction of ISIS  to  the killing of its leader Al Baghdadi  that the west  should  not  celebrate for long because ISIS  terrorism  is already  at  the door  step of Europe.  That  should resonate in Britain’s  Dec 12 elections as well as in Italy, Czech  and Slovak Republics, ungary and Poland  which  have strong, anti  migrants electorates. In  Britain’s  case the electorate is polarized on Brexit and the nation is divided  with  secessionist sentiments prevalent in Scotland and N Ireland. While  Labor  may  look an unlikely winner in December it is  difficult  to  see the Conservatives winning with a PM whose  credibility on Brexit Deal  or No  Deal,  is in tatters.The  Conservatives  have  blundered twice  on Brexit  and  should  not be rewarded with   power. Under Cameron they  read the political signals wrong and called a referendum they  thought will result in Remain  and lost. Theresa May later called an election to consolidate power, lost her majority  and lost  her way in getting a Brexit Deal. Boris  Johnson  after Oct 31 and  with Britain still in the EU and  No  Deal looks,  like  a wet  cock  at best,  and a good  example on Brexit,  of  someone  who  has  surely eaten  his cake but would still  have it in terms  of power. A  pity indeed.

Once again long live the Federal  Republic of Nigeria.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts