Author: The Nation

  • Language activism (III)

    Language activism (III)

    The greatest threat to language diversity in the world is the English language as it spreads across the globe in the manner of a plague. Close to a quarter of the world already speaks the language and many more are learning it. Even then, there are probably more Chinese speakers than English speakers but Chinese speakers are restricted to one country and their language does not carry the threat of global domination which is associated with the English language.

    The situation with the English language has created a debate within communities, especially in Africa in which the language was established through colonialisation. The acquisition of the language in those countries was at the expense of local languages which were reduced to the status of vernaculars labouring under a massive inferiority complex. English was after all, the language of conquerors who had demonstrated what at the turn of the twentieth century were regarded as signs of superiority to the colonised peoples. If the British had been able to seize all the power within their colonies, it stood to reason that their language was superior to the local languages. This conclusion appeared to be reasonable at the time and as the Yoruba have taken to saying, the world has become the property of the oyinbo people to do with it whatever was their wish. As it happened, the British did not need to belabour this point as the colonised people themselves saw this as a matter of course and regarded the acquisition of English as a desirable exercise. After all, they had been pushed into a position of weakness if not abject subservience. It is interesting to note that unlike the French, the British, at the beginning of their colonisation exercise, did not attempt to force their language on the colonised. This was radically different with the French. You will find that more than fifty years after the end of colonisation, French is still spoken in former French colonies as the language is spoken in France. This is because language transfer was part of the assimilation process which the French imposed on their colonial subjects. The nonchalant attitude of the British has given rise to a situation in which there are Nigerian Englishes, that is, English spoken with various local flavours. It appears that we have been able to domesticate the English language and clothed it in locally fabricated robes. The history of the English language lends itself to this treatment. The propagation of French in the French colonies was both methodical and rigidly controlled so that there was very little danger of the development of African varieties of French. The difference between the two colonial powers was historical.

    READ ALSO: Benin Republic demons

    The original inhabitants of Britain spoke various Gaelic and Celtic languages, at least until Anglo-Saxon tribes arrived from parts of present-day Germany. They brought with them their Germanic language, a version of the language which, because of its simplicity, was regarded as low Dutch. It was controlled with only rudiments of a grammatical structure and looking back now, it is clear that this grew in time to be the major strength of the language as it aided its spread within the British isles. This being the case, it pushed the earlier indigenous languages into the fringes of what is now Wales, parts of Scotland and across the Irish sea into Ireland.

    The new Brits or English had hardly settled down in their new island home when they started receiving unwelcome visits from their Scandinavian cousins from across the North sea. Better known in history as Vikings, they were sea faring brigands who swept in from time to time to pillage seaside towns from which they were also not averse to kidnapping the odd young maiden after killing the men of course. So great was their menace that the locals also thought it wise to pay some indemnity to their tormentors so as to be left in peace or, at least some semblance of peace. Known as danegeld, this payment bought peace for certain parts of England until the Danish king decided to incorporate the ransom paying parts into his kingdom. This shows the wisdom of not negotiating with terrorists! In the meantime, many words of Scandinavian origin were incorporated into the expanding English lexicon.

    At the time that the Danish king was casting his awful shadow on parts of England, other Vikings were menacing Ireland and parts of France. Thoroughly intimidated and beaten down, the Vikings who were called Normans in France were given a large portion of land adjacent to the English Channel. They therefore became the owners of Normandy and settled down as rulers of the place and began to cast covetous eyes across the English Channel. After all, the place was part of the Danish empire at one time, they saw conquering and incorporating it into Normandy could only be considered logical. It fell to William the conqueror, also known as William the bastard to fulfil this enterprise. On October 12th 1066, William crossed the English Channel accompanied by an army under the command of 21 noblemen and by evening of that day had destroyed the English army under King Harold and became the ruler of all England. He distributed the kingdom to his generals whose descendants still own the lands gifted to their forebears in 1066.

    The Normans settled in Normandy and rather than continue to speak their own Scandinavian language, they switched over to French, the language of their reluctant hosts. The Normans brought the French language with them and for more than three centuries made it the language of the English court. It was not until those three hundred years had passed that English was promoted to be used in official documents. By the sixteenth century however, English had become the only official language of the realm.

    As with all the other conquerors who had darkened the shores of Britain before them, the Normans came over with their own version of their adopted French language. And, as with all the languages that came before, the English refused to adopt the language of the conquerors. What they did was to incorporate the French language into English. They did it so well that up to 40% of English as it is spoken today is either French or French derived. This has enriched English to such an extent that if those French words did not exist within it, it would not be English. For example, a live cow is cow in English, meat from the dead animal is called beef in modern English and it is French derived. In the case of deer, the borrowed word is venison. There are thousands of other examples which give a roundness to the English language, a roundness which you are not likely to find in other languages from other parts of the world. There are also almost as many Latin words in English as are French. So, what you have is a Germanic language that is almost as Romance in character as it is Germanic. There is no language that is half as promiscuous as the English language. It went to North America and came away with a multitude of words including tomato, chilli, tobacco, lacrosse, tomahawk and very many more. From the other side of the world in India, the English picked up a slew of words such as verandah, bungalow, thug, loot, calico and many more.

    When I suggested that we should be able to teach science subjects in Yoruba to a friend he just could not wrap it around his head. How would you say Chemistry or Biology in Yoruba? What he did not know is that Chemistry is an Arabic word, so is Algebra. We talk of algorithms these days but how many of us know that it is of Arabic extraction. Many of the words we encounter in science are also derived from Greek and Latin. Consult a modern English dictionary and you will find that japa, okada and other Nigerian origin words have been admitted into the English language. Strip English of all those stolen and borrowed words and just what do you have left?

  • BUSINESS PERSONS OF THE YEAR 2025: Abdul Samad Rabiu – Accomplishment  with benevolence

    BUSINESS PERSONS OF THE YEAR 2025: Abdul Samad Rabiu – Accomplishment  with benevolence

    Abdul Salam Rabiu, is not exactly the typical businessman whose impact, wealth and reach terminate within the family and enclave. No. His spans the larger segment of the populace, and not restricted to near family circles alone. His businesses have lifted many from lack and want, and provided employment to thousands, both direct and indirect engagement. He has shared and continue to splash his resources in numerous community social responsibility projects, including roads construction, schools, scholarship awards and building of health facilities, thus endearing his companies to people in areas of their operations. These qualities among others, singled him out for selection as one of The Nation’s Business Persons of the Year, 2025, writes Group Business Editor, Simeon Ebulu.

    The story of Abdul Samad Rabiu’s rise to the zenith of Nigeria’s list of business moguls, cannot be told only in the context of his achievements, be it as a businessman, or a philanthropist. Most of what is acknowledged today as his accomplishments are the outcomes of a resolute determination to fight to retain his space, and a resolve to succeed. 

    His rise to his present status wasn’t by accident, or luck; it was a journey laced with obstacles, both from the private sector business community and the public service, with clear connivance and acquiescence from senior government officials.

    The intrigues started early from the time he took over from his father, until lately when he had a brawl with the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) over the concession of jetty and space at the Port Harcourt Port, in Rivers State. He literarily fought his way through various roadblocks to the enviable position he occupies today.

    Suffice it to say that these battles were fought and surmounted in virtually all segments of his businesses, from flour mills, to sugar refining, ports operations, and cement production,  just to mention but a few. It’s been battles of wits and brawn.

    Today, Rabiu is listed among very few Nigerian leading businessmen whose exploits and accomplishments in manufacturing, trading and logistics, under its trade mark – the BUA Group, have transcended the nation’s boundaries. They are rated currently as global brands in virtually all the segments they are engaging.

    The BUA Group which he founded and sits atop as Executive Chairman, over three decades ago, boasts of leading corporations which in themselves are leaders in their respective fields of operations.  These companies include BUA Foods, BUA Cement and Real Estate, among others. Each segment of the business is programmed to meet specific needs of Nigerian households and the larger international community. 

    BUA Foods, for example, is committed to bridging the supply gap of the nation’s sugar requirement and staple foods, such as rice, among others. To this end, the group has established the BUA Sugar Estate located in Lafiagi, Kwara State, which also includes a large sugarcane plantation and integrated sugar mill, refinery and an ethanol plant. BUA also has other sugar-related facilities, including a refinery in Port Harcourt and Apapa in Rivers and Lagos states respectively.

    READ ALSO: Dominant APC waits with bated breath

    The group, typified by BUA Cement, has also risen up to meet the nation’s and others’ construction requirements, as well as the build-industry with the commissioning of new the lines in Edo and Sokoto States. The company is continuing on its expansion plans through new projects.

    Over the years, the BUA Group and its associated companies, have shown class in the Nigerian Capital Market, the NGX group with the outstanding performance of their stocks, at times providing market leadership.

    In making investment decisions, Rabiu takes into consideration the need to diversify his portfolio by spreading investments across different sectors. Adopting this strategy minimises risk and maximises profit potentials. Also, investment in high-demand sectors is one of his preferences. He leveraged on this strategy in his decision to embrace cement production, and it has paid off handsomely.

    Making cement available and at affordable price, dovetails into one of his dreams of contributing to making housing available to the low and moderate income earners in our communities. It is for this reason that he advocated some years ago for reduction of cement prices, and went ahead, on his own to slash the price of his brand to enable access to the product for buyers.

    One of his strengths equally lies in his understanding of the Nigerian market and its challenges. His collaboration, particularly with government and international firms, has fuelled BUA Group’s growth. For real estate investors, forming strategic partnership has brought additional resources, expertise and access to larger projects. Rabiu’s success in the cement and real estate industries highlight the value of investing in sectors with consistent demand.

    His investment decisions are known to be guided by a long-term vision, centered on industrialisation, backward integration, and social impact within Nigeria and across Africa. His philosophy emphasises self-sufficiency, efficiency, and job creation over short-term profits. Also, he sees backward Integration as a core strategy which involves focusing on local production and sourcing raw materials within Nigeria which ultimately reduces reliance on imports and foreign exchange, and adds value to the local economy

    Philanthropy, awards and honours

    Rabiu has earned several awards across the spectrum. These include the Nigerian National Honors of Commander of the Federal Republic (CFR) and Commander of The Order of The Niger (CON). At the International level, he has received the ‘African Industrialist of the Year Award’ at the All-Africa Business Leaders Awards held in 2016. Others are Business and Leadership Awards, and has also been recognised as “CEO of the Year” by the African CSR Awards in 2022 and has equally received the ‘Sun Man of the Year Awards’ in the same year.

    In philanthropy, his exploits are unassailable. He was named ‘New Telegraph Philanthropist of the Year’ n 2021 and received numerous awards for his philanthropic work, including the ASR Africa Initiative awards for Social Impact and Human Capital Advancement. He has equally been honoured with the PEARL Lifetime Achievement Award for National Economic Development.

    His philanthropy extends beyond this single act. Through the Abdul Samad Rabiu Africa Initiative (ASR Africa), he has channelled significant resources into healthcare, education, and social development. Whether through funding research institutions, equipping hospitals, or supporting young entrepreneurs, his approach reflects a structured vision for national growth.

    What sets Rabiu apart is his ability to balance business success with social responsibility. His decision to lower cement prices, despite resistance from some special interest groups, was driven by a desire to make homeownership more accessible. For those benefiting from his generosity, he represents more than wealth – he is a force of change, making prosperity more inclusive.

  • CONTROVERSY OF THE YEAR 2025: Akpabio vs Akpoti-Uduaghan

    CONTROVERSY OF THE YEAR 2025: Akpabio vs Akpoti-Uduaghan

    It all began like a routine legislative action on February 20, 2025: a change in sitting arrangements in the Senate chamber necessitated by an alteration in the upper legislature’s composition after the defection of some opposition members to the majority wing. But by some strange alchemy, an otherwise simple exercise metamorphosed into a storm that shook the red chamber to its very foundation.

    At the heart of the brouhaha was Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the Senator representing Kogi Central, who declined the new seat that was allocated to her and was consequently denied audience by Senate President Godswill Akpabio as she made to address the chamber from her former seat. The stage was thus set for an altercation between her and the Senate President.

    Asked to be escorted by the Chief Whip out of the legislative chamber, the Kogi Senator, reputed for wearing controversy like a cloak, launched into a tirade, protesting loudly and accusing Senator Akpabio of setting out to silence her. “I don’t care if I am silenced,” she wailed. “I am not afraid. You have denied me my privilege!”

    The matter, however, assumed a whole new dimension with an allegation by the female senator that Akpabio was trying to get at her because she previously turned down his advances, accusing the Senate President of sexually harassing her. She said: “Mr Senate President, ever since the night club incident, you have deliberately silenced my voice. My bills have not been able to scale through to second reading. I am not afraid of being silenced, but I will do so in honour.

    “As a senator duly elected by my people, I chose to remain on this seat, come what may. The worst you can do is to suspend me from this sitting, and that will not stop me from contributing my quota to my constituency, the Senate and Nigeria as a whole.”

    With a finger pointed at Akpabio, she added: “Mr Senate President, I have taken a lot from you. If you don’t want me to speak publicly, I will let the whole world know how you have discriminated against me, maligned me, dehumanised me.

    “Your choice of words has embarrassed me. Mr President, do what you may, I will not leave this seat.”

    All the while, the Senate President maintained a calm mien and only instructed the Sergeant-at-Arms to lead her out of the chambers. “Please, take her out so that we can continue with today’s activities,” he said.

    READ ALSO: Benin Republic demons

    Anyone who thought the matter would end within the Senate chamber soon found out how mistaken they were as Akpoti-Uduaghan fanned the smouldering crisis into an inferno that threatened to consume the Senate. Like a bolt from the blue, she changed the narrative from legislation to romance and sexual harassment became her sing-song as she internationalised the issue, dragging Akpabio to the Inter-Parliamentary Union to reiterate her allegation of sexual harassment even without a scintilla of evidence.

    The social media and indeed the national landscape were soon polarised into those in support of the Senate President and those backing Akpoti-Uduaghan as the latter launched a serious campaign against the Senate President, expanding his sins to include an attempt on her life and linking him to the killing of a young female undergraduate whose killer had since been arrested in Akwa Ibom State.

    It later turned out that Akpabio was not the first man the Kogi senator would accuse of sexually harassing her without any evidence or justification. Popular media consultant turned ambassador-designate, Reno Omokri, had revealed how the same woman previously accused him wrongly of flirting with her at a state banquet held in Aso Rock Presidential Villa by then President Goodluck Jonathan in honour of visiting President Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya on a date and time he was not even in the country.

    He said: “On Tuesday, 12 October 2021, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan had a dispute with me, and after the dispute, she went on social media and accused me of sexually harassing her.

    “Now, the thing is a month before, the Chibok girls were abducted. As one of the President’s spokespersons, Goodluck Jonathan sent me to the United States as a special envoy to try to clean up Nigeria’s image. I left in April and was not back in Nigeria until the end of May. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan lied.

    “So, what I did was I went on social media and published my passport stamps with my passport leaving Nigeria and then entering the United States showing the stamps. I also published a First Class British Airways ticket showing that I left Nigeria for the United Kingdom and from there to the United States. I wasn’t in Nigeria until Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan accused me.”

    He noted that after publishing his evidence in national dailies, Akpoti Uduaghan deleted all her accusations across all her social media handles.

    He added: “They (the senator and her husband) appealed to me and quoted scriptural references about Christians taking each other to court. I listened to them and settled the matter out of court, and I was paid a huge amount of money as damages, and I let the matter go.”

    In the case involving her and Akpabio, the Senate sent her on six-month suspension from which she only recently returned. The matter on the legality of her suspension remains yet in court. On Friday, Akpoti-Uduaghan in a social media post disclosed that Akpabio just slammed a N200 billion defamation suit on her. Clearly, the battle between the two is only just beginning.

  • DISASTER OF THE YEAR 2025: The Mokwa flood

    DISASTER OF THE YEAR 2025: The Mokwa flood

    Mohamed Adow, director of Kenya-based think tank Power Shift Africa, described the scenario appropriately as a “cruel irony” that parts of Africa can be “baked dry and then suffer from floods that destroy lives and livelihoods” and said “The terrible floods in Nigeria are another reminder that Africa stands on the front line of the climate crisis.”

    It was like the days of Noah.

    I am here talking about the torrential rainfall that submerged Mokwa, a market town in Niger State on May 28. The resultant flood claimed about 500 lives, injured no fewer than 200 while more than 600 persons were declared missing as a result of the flood. More than 4,000 others were rendered homeless.

    The displaced people faced severe food shortages, strained medical infrastructure that ultimately led to health risks such as cholera, typhoid fever and malnutrition. President Bola Tinubu had to activate the National Emergency Response Centre and deploy federal agencies. Relief materials and temporary shelters were also provided.

    The rain that triggered the devastating flood started on May 28, following several hours of torrential rainfall in Mokwa and surrounding areas. The entire town was submerged while many residents and homes were washed away, some in and with their vehicles. As a matter of fact, many motorists were stranded as early as May 28 when the Mokwa Bridge collapsed even as another bridge and two major roads were washed away, thus paralysing economic activities in the state.

    The state emergency management agency (NSEMA) listed the Tiffin Maza and Auguwan Hausawa districts as worst affected. At least 1,000 people, including a family of 12 where only four members were accounted for, and all 100 children from a madrasa (an Islamic school), were reported missing. Search and rescue went on for weeks.

    Unfortunately, like the floods of Noah, there was early warning signal that should have mitigated the disaster if it had been heeded. A piece written by Musa Baba Alhaji, an MSc student, Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Bayero University, Kano, published in Daily Trust of June 10 asserts: “The Mokwa flood didn’t come out of nowhere. It was not an act of God. It was a predictable and preventable disaster. For the past six years, federal authorities have consistently identified Niger State as one of the country’s most flood-prone areas. Just this past June, the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet) and the Nigerian Hydrological Services Agency (NIHSA) again issued early warnings: Niger State, because of its proximity to River Niger floodplains, is at high risk of flooding.”

    READ ALSO: Dominant APC waits with bated breath

    So, how come the flood still came and caught everyone napping? That is the million naira question we may not get an answer to. And we may not get answer to this and similar questions because, as soon as we do the subsequent lamentations and graveside orations after the fact, we return to business as usual.  The Mokwa flood has come and gone. Our leaders have done the predictable rituals and we have since moved on. No one is likely to be reprimanded, not to talk of punished. Until the next disaster strikes and the rigmarole is repeated.

    Lest we forget, in the same Mokwa town there had been a previous flood about six weeks before; that was precisely on April 16. The flood, caused by release of water from Jebba Hydroelectric Power Station claimed at least 13 lives, destroyed paddy fields, put the efforts of some 5,000 dry-season farmers in Kebbi, Sokoto, Katsina and Kano states in jeopardy. Naturally, the destruction of critical infrastructure and more than 25,000 acres of paddy fields and croplands seriously affected regional food supply chains. The economic losses ran into billions of naira. Forty-five schools and 44 health centres were destroyed while the flood also led to the collapse of Eppa Bridge.

    The April 16 flood, said to be the sixth caused by the release of water from the dam, ought to have taught the relevant authorities some lessons in a country where people are taught something and learnt something.

    But that is not in Nigeria.

    However, nothing I have said should be taken to suggest that Niger State is the only place in the country where this taught-nothing learnt-nothing syndrome recurs. It would seem a Nigerian malady. In 2024, flooding in Nigeria killed more than 1,200 people, injured at least 2,712 others, and displaced 1.2 million. Many states have experienced devastating floods despite early warnings by NiMet and the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA). The problems have had to do with failure of citizens to obey the relevant environmental laws, or absence of proactive measures by state governments to mitigate the impact of the floods, among several others.

    Rainfall is a part of life. As a matter of fact, we cannot be comfortable in prolonged dry season. There had been instances when people have had to engage rain makers to ‘send down the rain’, to paraphrase Reggae musician, Majek Fashek. Christians and Muslims alike have also had cause to plead with God or Allah, as it were, to let rain fall when there is a dearth of rainfall and the weather is unbearable. And we know that whenever it rains, the water must find its level. Floods occur when the outlets for rain water to pass through are blocked or inadequate.

    To be fair, Nigeria is not the only country where flood has wreaked havoc. There has been heavy flooding even in some advanced countries, with equally devastating consequences. For instance, as recently as July 4, destructive and deadly flooding took place in the Hill County region of the U.S. state of Texas. Water levels along the Guadalupe River rose rapidly during the flooding, which claimed at least 135 people, about 117 of them in Kerr County alone.   

    The difference between our own experience and experiences in other places, particularly the advanced countries, is that theirs are not recurring decimals as in our own case. People heed early warning signals in those places just as environmental laws are enforced. When people are asked to evacuate a place due to an expected disaster like flood or earthquake, they obey such directives. Unlike in our own situation where people keep asking where the government wants them to move to and would rather wait till the disaster strikes.

    Now that floods have wreaked havoc in Mokwa and some other places in the country this year, are we to expect that we would not have similar experiences with the next rainy season? This is a question in the womb of time. Suffice it to say that as we lay our bed, so we lie on it. If we respect environmental laws by not building on floodplains, by not dumping refuse in drainages and the governments also play their own part, then, we can heave a sigh of relief and sleep with our two eyes closed even if it rains cat and dog next year, or whenever.

  • Tinubu okays new Nigerian Army depot in Abakaliki

    Tinubu okays new Nigerian Army depot in Abakaliki

    • 3,439 recruits graduate, ready for deployment

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has approved the establishment of a new Nigerian Army depot in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State.

    The Chief of Army Staff (COAS), Lt Gen. Waidi Shaibu, while disclosing this on Saturday, described the establishment of a new army depot as part of the Nigerian Army’s efforts to expand manpower and enhance operational readiness nationwide.

    Shaibu made the announcement during the passing out parade of 3,439 recruits at Depot Nigerian Army Zaria, emphasizing that the new depot is a strategic initiative to ensure a continuous supply of well-trained soldiers for deployment across the country.

     “The approval for the new Depot in Abakaliki is part of our plan to increase the number of trained personnel available for national service and security operations. It will complement existing depots and enhance the Army’s capacity to address evolving security challenges,” he said.

    The COAS noted that the new facility would provide specialist and mission-oriented training, with a focus on marksmanship, fieldcraft, and combat readiness, aimed at producing disciplined, professional, and operationally capable soldiers.

    The COAS added that the new depot aligns with the Nigerian Army’s ongoing reforms to modernise training curricula, improve welfare for recruits, and strengthen the institutional capability of the Army to safeguard Nigeria’s territorial integrity.

    He also commended President Tinubu for his unwavering support to the Nigerian Army, describing the presidential approval as a major milestone in boosting the country’s defence infrastructure.

    READ ALSO: Benin Republic demons

    The COAS said the new depot in Abakaliki is expected to come on stream in due course and will play a key role in complementing the existing depots at Zaria, Osogbo, and other training facilities across the country.

     “This establishment of this depot is geared toward increasing the strength of the Nigerian army. The reasons are not far fetched; there are security challenges across the length and breadth of the country. Now with this additional 3,439 coming on board as well as next week we will have another 3,500 coming on board from Oshogbo, they will be giving advance infantry training before their deployment to the various theatres of operation.

    Army graduates 3,439 recruits

    Also, the Nigerian Army has strengthened its operational capacity by injecting 3,439 new recruits into ongoing operations nationwide.

     The recruits were members of the Nigerian Army’s 89 Regular Intake and had successfully completed six months of intensive training at the Depot Nigerian Army in Zaria on Saturday.

     Speaking at the Passing Out Parade (POP), COAS charged them to uphold the highest standards of loyalty, discipline, and professionalism as they formally join the service.

     The COAS, who was the Special Guest of Honour and Reviewing Officer, described the parade as “a testament to your dedication and perseverance,” showcasing the skills, discipline, and esprit de corps instilled in the recruits over the course of their training.

    Shaibu added that their successful training reflects hard work, dedication, and discipline.

     The COAS also urged the recruits to maintain integrity and respect for human rights in all operations, stressing that these values are the cornerstone of professional soldiering.

     He reminded them of the Oath of Allegiance they took, stressing that :”By that oath, you are now bound to uphold both civil and military laws. Avoid any act that may tarnish the image of the Nigerian Army or the nation. Serve with honour, dignity, and unwavering loyalty to constituted authority.”

     He noted that as the Army continued to confront emerging domestic and transnational threats, the new recruits are vital to sustaining operational readiness across the country.

     “Your successful training reflects hard work, dedication, and discipline. You have been moulded to meet the highest standards of soldiering and are now entrusted with the sacred duty of safeguarding the territorial integrity of our nation.

     “I have no doubt that you will rise to the challenges ahead and serve with honour, courage, and professionalism,” the COAS said.

     He commended Depot Nigerian Army for its historic role in producing professional soldiers since its establishment in 1924, adding that the premier institution remains the backbone of the Nigerian Army’s training capabilities.

     “I assure you that it will continue to receive unwavering support in terms of logistics, training infrastructure, and personnel welfare to maintain its high standards,” the COAS said.

  • Army boosts operations with 3,439 new recruits as COAS emphasises loyalty, discipline

    Army boosts operations with 3,439 new recruits as COAS emphasises loyalty, discipline

    The Nigerian Army has strengthened its operational capacity by injecting 3,439 new recruits into ongoing operations nationwide.

    The recruits were members of the Nigerian Army’s 89 Regular Intake and had successfully completed six months of intensive training at the Depot Nigerian Army in Zaria on Saturday.

    Speaking at the Passing Out Parade (POP), the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), Lt.-General Waidi Shaibu, charged them to uphold the highest standards of loyalty, discipline, and professionalism as they formally join the service.

    READ ALSO: Benin Republic demons

    The COAS, who was the Special Guest of Honour and Reviewing Officer, described the parade as a testament to the recruits’ dedication and perseverance, showcasing the skills, discipline, and esprit de corps instilled in them during their training.

    General Shaibu added that their successful training reflects hard work, dedication, and discipline.

    The COAS also urged the recruits to maintain integrity and respect for human rights in all operations, stressing that these values are the cornerstone of professional soldiering.

    He reminded them of the Oath of Allegiance they took, stressing that, “By that oath, you are now bound to uphold both civil and military laws. Avoid any act that may tarnish the image of the Nigerian Army or the nation. Serve with honour, dignity, and unwavering loyalty to constituted authority.”

    He noted that as the Army continued to confront emerging domestic and transnational threats, the new recruits are vital to sustaining operational readiness across the country.

  • Osun 2026: APC picks Oyebamiji as consensus candidate

    Osun 2026: APC picks Oyebamiji as consensus candidate

    • Tinubu congratulates ex-NIWA boss, urges unity, inclusivity ahead poll

    • Adeleke will fail in re-election bid, says APM guber candidate

    • 39-year-old entrepreneur wins AAC governorship ticket

    Former Managing Director of the Nigeria Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA), Bola Oyebamiji, has emerged as the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) for the 2026 Osun State governorship election.

    Oyebamiji, who leads a political movement known as AMBO, was presented as the sole aspirant of the party to the APC Governorship Primary Election Committee, chaired by Edo State Governor, Monday Okpebholo.

    The party’s primary election was held on Saturday at the Ebunoluwa Event Centre, where nine aspirants of the party withdrew from the race in his favour.

    On their behalf, Kunle Adegoke, SAN, formally moved the motion for withdrawal and nominated Oyebamiji as the sole candidate, a motion that was seconded by Senator Jide Omoworare.

    Following the endorsement, 1,660 delegates drawn from the party’s 332 wards across the state affirmed Oyebamiji through a voice vote, which was subsequently authenticated by the APC Governorship Primary Election Committee.

    Announcing the outcome, the chairman of the committee said: “By the power conferred on me as Chairman of the primary committee, I hereby declare Bola Oyebamiji, AMBO, as the candidate of our party.”

    In his acceptance speech, Oyebamiji expressed appreciation to the primary election committee, party leaders and delegates for the confidence reposed in him to fly the APC flag in the forthcoming election.

    He pledged to prioritise poverty reduction, revive the health sector and address the infrastructural deficits confronting the state.

    Reacting to his emergence, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu urged Oyebamiji to be magnanimous in victory by reaching out to all party leaders and former aspirants.

    In a statement issued by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, the President praised the Osun State chapter of the APC for the unity, maturity and spirit of reconciliation that preceded and permeated the primary election, which was conducted through affirmation.

    READ ALSO: Benin Republic demons

    President Tinubu commended other aspirants in the race for their decision to step down in favour of Oyebamiji, describing the move as a demonstration of party loyalty and collective commitment to the ideals and goals of the APC.

    “The journey to reclaim Osun State for the progressive fold in the 2026 governorship election has begun. I urge all members and leaders of APC in the state to remain focused, united, and resolute. Victory is achievable, and together, we will succeed,” he said.

    The President also acknowledged the orderly conduct of the primary election, which was chaired by Edo State Governor, Senator Monday Okpebholo, in Osogbo, the Osun State capital, where party delegates unanimously affirmed Oyebamiji’s candidature.

    President Tinubu expressed confidence that the unity displayed by the party during the primary would strengthen its prospects ahead of the 2026 governorship election, calling on all stakeholders to sustain the momentum and work collectively toward electoral success.

    Meanwhile, a real estate developer, Hon. Adewale Adebayo, has emerged as the governorship candidate of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) for the 2026 election.

    Adebayo’s emergence was ratified by the Chairman of the APM Primary Election Committee, Idowu Babarinde, after party members presented him as the sole aspirant at the party’s state secretariat in Ogo-Oluwa, Osogbo.

    According to Adebayo, “The current government has failed. Public trust is gone. Promises are empty. The people are tired. The same way the PDP failed Governor Adeleke, Osun will do the same for him for his re-election bid come August 8, 2026. APM is ready to send him back where he belongs.”

    Also, a 39-year-old entrepreneur, Olajide Esan, has clinched the governorship ticket of the African Action Congress (AAC) for the Osun governorship election.

    The Osun State Chairman of the AAC, Tayo Adeyemi, disclosed this while addressing journalists after the party’s primary election held at its secretariat in the Powerline area of Osogbo, noting that Esan emerged with the backing of party members across the state.

  • Kanu: Igbo groups question UK

    Kanu: Igbo groups question UK

    Pursuant to the Nnamdi Kanu affair, an amalgamation of Igbo diaspora groups has condemned the indifference of the United Kingdom (UK) to the trial and jailing of the controversial IPOB leader. Mr Kanu, they reminded the UK government, holds a British passport in addition to being a Nigerian. As the groups put it: “A British passport holder was abducted from Kenya without legal extradition, subjected to a sham trial under a repealed law, and sentenced to life imprisonment; yet London remains silent…This silence is deeply troubling and undermines the credibility of the UK as a global human rights champion… But when a British citizen faces unlawful detention and a life sentence, the government’s indifference is deafening. Silence here reads as complicity.”

    READ ALSO: Benin Republic demons

    All this is just emotional bilge water. Mr Kanu does not hold a British passport only to merit the intervention of the UK. In this case, and given the nature of the charges, he is also Nigerian. Which one, in the estimation of the British, should supersede the other? Terrorism, everyone now understands, is a grave subject that neither the British nor any other serious country would fool around with. The groups idolise Mr Kanu. Good for them. But they should have restrained him during his wild days of inciting his supporters to mayhem. Blaming the British or accusing them of passivity in the groups’ misreading of the situation and ignorance of the law will not change anything or give freedom to the jailed ‘freedom fighter’.

  • CONFLICT OF THE YEAR 2025: Wike vs Fubara

    CONFLICT OF THE YEAR 2025: Wike vs Fubara

    The Nation editors branded the Nyesom Wike-Siminalayi Fubara high-octane war as Conflict of the Year 2025.  It pitched a mentor against his mentee; the godfather against his godson. It raged from October 2023 till March 2025: heading into the Rivers emergency rule that ran from March 18 to September 18 vide Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

    But as that hissing, fizzing and whizzing combat singed into an underdog surrender, as craven as his ill-fated rebellion was roaring, it could well be dubbed – and creditably so – the Resolution of the Year.

    Post-settlement, Governor Fubara has been as dovish as he was hawkish, at the zenith of the conflict.  That’s not bad – is it? – except that his conflict proxies, fair-weather allies that pumped him with much combat steroids, with disparate motives, wailed at what they deemed his craven collapse!  Some conflict entrepreneurial blues!

    Still, the combat thawing hasn’t been one-sided.  Wike, the clear victor, sure permitted some chips on his shoulders – if subdued – for bringing to heel a noisy rebel. 

    Even then, the eternally bruising, high-octane Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister may have moved on to other executive brawling to save the soul of Abuja, under his watch.  But on Rivers, he has been temperate and conciliatory – a big deal!

    If this is not the lull before the storm – and it may well be, since the 2027 sweepstakes loom on the horizon – Nigeria may have scored big in political conflict resolution. 

    Is that a sign of a maturing polity?  Or just a misleading blip – given the lasting havoc the Obafemi Awolowo-Samuel Ladoke Akintola (SLA) feuding wreaked on the polity?

    The Awo-SLA conflict, which forced the first emergency rule in Nigerian history in May 1962 in the defunct Western Region, led to the collapse of the First Republic (1960-1966). 

    READ ALSO: Benin Republic demons

    That ancestral feuding has calcified today’s South West into two – eternal? – camps: the progressives (Awo’s proud political scions); and the conservatives (SLA’s misbegotten offspring), with the progressives in clear dominance. 

    Even beyond the South West: the PDP loss of power (2015) to the APC, under the late President Muhammadu Buhari; and, from 2023, the full arrival of the “June Twelvers” at the federal corridor – with President Bola Tinubu at the helm; and Governor Uba Sani running the manor in Kaduna, the North’s political capital – being “progressive” or “conservative” has acquired a new national hue to drive political legitimacy.

    Still, whither Rivers politics, long after both Wike and Fubara are gone; and their “war” the sound byte of history?  That, for now, is in the womb of time! 

    Suffice it to say, however: the resolution, even with the Rivers emergency rule, seems far neater than the Western Region crisis.  That, for now, appears a plus for Nigeria’s democracy and conflict resolution. But we’ll see how it pans out in the very long run!

    How did it all start, the Wike-Fubara war?  After the evil Lady Macbeth had goaded her husband, the tragic Macbeth, into regicide against his King, Duncan, the doomed Macbeth muttered to himself: “To be thus is nothing/But to be safely thus”! By that, his tragedy was cemented.  From that spot, he worked extra hard to self-ruin.

    A similar sentiment must have fired Fubara into the fight – you’re governor, act like one!  But, to be fair, Wike himself, by his public persona, was no less overbearing.

    So, when the Wike-Fubara hostilities broke out on 18 October 2023, it seemed a fight-to-finish.  Fubara had his gubernatorial pride – more of hubris! – to protect. Wike had his political structure to defend.  It was the classic clash between the rabid executioner and the intrepid suicidal, with neither as much as blinking an eye lid!

    Fubara’s stalled impeachment, despite Wike controlling 27 out of 32 Rivers legislators, was the underdog’s first skirmish victory, against a baleful over-dog and overlord. 

    To further cement that victory and crow as premature lord of the manor – a godson just overthrew his godfather! – Fubara moved to pull down the legislative sanctuary, the Rivers State House of Assembly, a strategic error that would cost him dear!

    Eager to protect the “structure” that pushed back everyone to gift Fubara the gubernatorial diadem, the Wike camp almost blundered into own strategic error: the 27 loyal legislators’ declaration that they had left PDP for APC.  But beyond that bluff, the move wasn’t consummated – at least going by the final court verdict.

    Meanwhile, hoping to roast Wike by his rather notorious disagreeability, a concert of Wike foes leapt into the fray as protector-garrison: to shield the rebel godson from his intemperate godfather.

    That was quite a medley: Ijaw nationalists and supremacists (led by the late Edwin Clark, from Delta State), Rivers Ijaw homers, sworn to unhorsing the explosive Wike (witness: Madam Ann-Kio Briggs and El-Hajd Asari Dokubo, now monarch of his community), a living godfather wary at the emergence of another: former Rivers Governor, Peter Odili (1999-2007), and even opportunistic trade groups, as the Nigerian Bar Association (that have sundry grouse to grind with the Bola Tinubu order), using the Wike-Fubara tiff as the perfect proxy war, to unleash own bombs! 

    Still, as Wike put fire to Fubara’s behind; and as Fubara, riding on the crest of popular sentiments in Ijaw and sundry anti-Wike circles, unleashed insane boasts, one person appeared to be thinking clear: President Bola Tinubu.

    Aware of the fatal distraction a Rivers crisis, between Wike (his ministerial appointee) and Fubara (a non-hostile governor) to his government, he summoned both to an Abuja parley.  The result was the 18 December 2023 Rivers peace accord.

    No matter the imperfections of that accord, it was the Rivers and South-South homers, led by the late Clark that shut it down.  Indeed, Clark wrote apocalyptic letters, which claimed the President sided with Wike and delivered an Ijaw son on a platter!

    That’s hardly true, though the harsh reality was that the Wike “structure” was far more dominant in the Rivers’ landscape than the governor it installed.  It was give-and-take, yes.  But the Abuja document reflected that reality, which the Fubara camp took with hysteria.

    What followed was a rash of terrible errors: the governor passing the Rivers budget – for two years’ running – through a legislature of four, out of 32; conducting a doomed local government election; and thoroughly abusing the courts, and even the Inspector-General of Police, because the governor felt they stood in his way; and finally, when the chips were down, signalling to violent players – the so-called “youths” – to ready selves for action on the governor’s side! 

    That was the proverbial last straw that broke the camel’s back – for no sooner did the governor brag than oil-pipeline explosions rent the air!  Brewing violence prompted the Rivers emergency rule.  But ironically, it also saved Fubara from political decapitation.

    After the Supreme Court had declared all of Fubara’s actions before it null and void, the 27-member Assembly, all Wike loyalists, moved for the kill.  They served Governor Fubara and Deputy, Ngozi Odu, with impeachment notices.  The freezer was the Rivers emergency rule, which President Tinubu imposed on March 18.

    So, when deep in emergency rule, a war-weary, suspended Governor Fubara started warning against “Oshobey” – loud but brainless populist bawling – students of political drama knew it was one way or another, heading for some denouement. 

    That eventually came on June 26, when the President again herded the combatants to a peace meeting in Abuja to jaw-jaw, after a futile war-war!  Talk of the biblical stone that the builders refused, yet turned the fundamental cornerstone!

    Post-emergency rule – the emergency ended on September 18 – it has all been quiet on the Rivers front!

    Unlike the 1962 Western Nigeria experience, the 2025 Rivers emergency seems to have negotiated some peace – a peace of the graveyard?  No one knows! 

    But however it turns out, whereas the federal authorities back in 1962 sided with the godson (SLA) to politically bury the godfather (Awo), to gain his political empire, the Abuja order of 2025 appears more circumspect. 

    However, Fubara’s ever-grumpy proxies, chafing at a lost cause, insist agreeing to a one-term governorship, to placate the Wike structure that fired him into office, was no peace but a craven collapse – maybe!

    But at least, the emergency crisis didn’t lead to a “wet-ie” arson and mass anarchy that eventually torched and gutted the First Republic.  Though no one knows what the future holds, the Rivers’ experience is a clear improvement on the Western Regions’, even as 2027 looms.

  • Igbo Leaders’ numbing fulminations

    Igbo Leaders’ numbing fulminations

    Two presumably respected professors signed the communiqué of the last meeting of the Igbo Leaders of Thought (ILT) held in Enugu last week. One is well known: Prof. Elochukwu Amucheazi, president of the group and pioneer Director-General of the National Orientation Agency (NOA). The second professor is not quite as popular in the media, now or in the past: Jerry Chukwuokolo, secretary and a former head of the Department of Philosophy and Religion, Ebonyi State University. He is reported to have done a lot of work on socio-political and developmental philosophy, particularly within Igbo culture. Prof. Amucheazi is a political scientist who once taught at the University of Nigeria, Nnsuka, but is now retired. They may have signed the communiqué, but there is nothing to show that they authored it, or whether they didn’t have any reservations about sections of the draft.

    But the views expressed in the communiqué amounted to sweeping generalisations. Three items stand out in media reports of the communiqué. One, citing what they describe as escalation in killings across Nigeria, especially of Christians, and needing to prevent Nigeria from full-scale collapse, they posit: “The U.S. must not hesitate to intervene physically, including invading Nigeria to disperse the numerous bandits now harassing the nation. We cannot watch history repeat itself. We owe it to future generations to halt this slide into genocide and war.” Two, they condemn what they believe is “genocidal profiling and economic strangulation” of Igbo businesses, linking it to anti-Igbo policies, perhaps in Lagos, and Fulani expansionism. They then conclude that if injustices against the Igbo prevail, the ideology of Biafra will remain attractive. Three, they reject the life sentence imposed on IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu as “unjust, illegal, and politically motivated,” insisting that the conviction is “sad, indefensible and speculative,” and capable of turning him into a “Mandela-like symbol of resistance.” They ask for his release, rehabilitation and compensation.

    READ ALSO: Dominant APC waits with bated breath

    The eminent professors obviously spared nothing. To them Nigeria is heading for collapse, the bedraggled United States is the knight in shining armour, Kanu is right and justified, and the Igbo are once again, perhaps as always, the victims of budding, if not full-blown, genocide. No communiqué can be more tendentious, and no analysis can be so offensively opaque. It is unlikely the professors wrote the communiqué, or read it with the attentiveness it deserves. And if they wrote or read what they finally disseminated to the public, they perhaps submitted unwillingly to the herd mentality of excoriating outsiders than engaging in the self-contemplation and careful examination which the occasion and Nigeria demand.

    Start from their call for US invasion of Nigeria as a means of correcting the country’s many paradoxes and conflicts. Is the US president Donald Trump, in their view, a paragon of democratic leadership? And is the US itself an exemplar of good behaviour at the international level, especially with its gunboat diplomacy against Venezuela, the auctioning of Ukraine to Russia, and the insults and threats to friends and allies alike? Just how sagely does Mr Trump appear to be to the two Nigerian professors in light of his ongoing castration of the United Nations and the almost total demolition of the rules-based order? Mr Trump is abusive, uncouth, disorganised, contemptuous of Blacks and developing economies, and lacking in depth. Is this the same man Professors Amucheazi and Chukwuokolo are inviting to restore sanity and order to Nigeria?

    It is not certain who the other attendees were at the ILT meeting last week, whether they were jaded and ageing academicians or mid-level rabble-rousers from the streets co-opted into making up the numbers at the meeting and giving teeth to the communiqué. Whoever they were, it is shocking and disappointing that they joined many unthinking others to advocate the release of the self-absorbed Mr Kanu whose organisation, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), unleashed mayhem against mostly the people of the Southeast. And comparing him with Nelson Mandela? Well, what kind of hyperbole is that? Not only is the trial still ongoing, and the outcomes at the appellate courts predictable, it is astonishing that the professors could describe his conviction as illegal, unjustifiable and politically motivated. Did the ILT follow his trial, and if they did perhaps absentmindedly, did they read the judgement? Even if the ILT does not care about the lives destroyed in the Southeast and the families shattered, nor the gargantuan economic losses and the humiliating IPOB-midwifed Monday sit-at-home order that locked down the region and paralysed business and social activities every week in the name of securing freedom for Mr Kanu and freeing Biafra, surely they should care about what the law says and how the trial judge interpreted it.

    Finally, the professors and their communiqué speak to what they describe as genocidal profiling and Fulani expansionism to justify the retention of the ill-fated idea of Biafra in Southeast minds. These two superficial tools of incitement are quite popular in the region and among the Igbo worldwide. Instead of the Igbo intelligentsia carefully deconstructing these tools and helping the region to heal and move on even in the face of non-closure of the Biafra War, they have decided to join the rabble by boosting its presumptions. But is it the Igbo alone that are facing Fulani expansionism? And in the face of refusal to return the country to ‘true’ federalism, a departure first articulated and advocated by some Igbo politicians in the First Republic, has every major ethnic group in Nigeria not felt the pangs of ‘genocidal profiling’?

    While Mr Kanu may be the hero of many south-easterners, the other regions see in him a tragic cult hero. The Southeat may view Mr Trump and the US as knights in shining armour, the rest of Nigeria and the world see him as a flawed and superficial leader masking his inadequacies under aggressive pro-Americanism. They cannot and will not save anyone. The professors should seek solace elsewhere rather than chase a chimera.