Author: The Nation

  • Toyota reclaims crown as world’s  biggest car company

    Toyota reclaims crown as world’s biggest car company

    Our Reporter

     

    Toyota sold more vehicles in 2020 than any other car company, edging ahead of Volkswagen Group in a year dominated by the pandemic

    Toyota was the world’s best-selling carmaker in 2020, taking back the title from Volkswagen Group in a year hit by the coronavirus crisis.

    The Japanese auto giant reclaimed the crown thanks to a sales decline that was less severe than its arch-rival during the global pandemic.

    Toyota sales were down 11 percent in 2020, to 9.53 million vehicles.

    Volkswagen Group deliveries fell 15 percent, to 9.31 million.

    It is because Volkswagen is more reliant on the European new car market that led to its greater decline: sales in the region fell 24 percent in 2020 (and they were down 29 percent in the UK).

    Trade body the ACEA described the EU sales decline to less than 10 million vehicles as “unprecedented”, reports Automotive News.

    Read Also: Toyota unveils COVID-19 ambulance

    Toyota performs more strongly in the United States, said the industry title; sales there declined 14.4 percent in 2020.

    It is the first time in five years that Toyota emerged as the world’s biggest car company.

    Automotive News adds that it could be part of a longer-term trend.

    Although VW Group is expected to regain the title again in 2021, Toyota will then pull back ahead every year to 2025, thanks to strong sales in Japan and the US.

    Overall, 76.8 million cars were sold across the world in 2020. This should recover to 84.4 million in 2021, and hit almost 95 million by 2025.

  • Warlords

    Warlords

    By Sam Omatseye

    We are living in the age of the tribesman. An age of biceps, the dagger and the caveman’s eyes. Pity has no role over a corpse. Nor laughter after a slaughter, except to scorn. The tribe is now the refuge, the high tower of the person. The commonwealth has regressed into an antique. Only the mouse goes there. The strong roar: To your fortress, O tribesman.

    Hence today, the men with bandwidths of fame are not the frontline workers in moon clothes, or the doctors on the danger list of Covid-19. It is the people who issued a quit notice to a Bishop for expressing his views like another cleric in another time, in communist Poland, Father Jerzy Popieluszko.  Or a man undistinguished, except for three slashes on each jaw and his resort to counter-hate, sends a group out of town. Both meet a past master in the ring.  He is a young man in solemn attire and a priestly face but whose phrases boil fear into arms.

    So, we hear of the rise of a shadowy man called Sunday Igboho in the west, and an ethnic entrepreneur in the east called Nnamdi Kanu, and in the north, we see quite a few of them who now issue quit notices. It should surprise no one. In Hausa language, it is lokachi. In German, it is zeitgeist.

    It is a time when we extol and serenade hate of the other, and Jean Paul Sartre captures it in an apocalyptic register: “Hell is other people.”

    The pity is that they all have cheerleaders. It is not just a pity. It is the tragedy. Quit notices did not begin today. Not a few years ago, an activist Shetima Yerima issued a quit notice to the Igbo living in the north. It raked up dust of fury from the elite, and it turned out to be another non-event, like the irritant of a fart. It set a precedent though, and now it has become a scourge of the day.

    The fellow from the southwest, Igboho, hit the news wave like a folk hero. He upstaged his governor, the showy Seyi Makinde of Oyo State. Igboho’s people in Ibarapa wanted a voice. They had lived in fear and trembling. They had farms but they could not reap. They had wives, but they were defiled. They had homes but could not sleep in peace. Bandits from another land had snatched away their sovereign pride. They have wailed, but no official ear listened. They became a people without a help. Like V.S. Naipaul’s novel, In A Free State, they were going to be a people without a place. They needed a hero. When Igboho came, they embraced him. They had found a hero. Marxists would not agree that a hero can transcend a people, but the Igangan people will differ. The Marxist Playwright Bertolt Brecht wept in his play Galileo that “unhappy the land that is in need of heroes.” The people would spit at the German’s taunt. Igboho was their man. He embodied their aspiration. He was a messiah in flesh and blood.

    He is a hater. But they see him as their lover. He is the one who made the world know that their community was a kidnapper’s haven, that the marauder enthroned impunity. They made feast out of their sweats, their leader made fortune out of their absences and servitude. Their red-blooded men played David’s eye on their Bathsheba and were smitten by their Babylonish garments. So they raped and were free enough to rape again. And they could do nothing.

    Bonfire ensued, the settlers fled, and their leader dethroned forever. The Seriki Fulani was accused as the broker over the broken. He fattened on their misfortune.

    Governor Rotimi Akeredolu had attracted the Governors to his state, and they agreed that open grazing was not allowed. They gave great speeches. But to this essayist, it was a cosmetic show. Who was going to enforce the law? The headlines did not say that what Akeredolu issued was legal. It did not say it was not legal. They just came to make peace, to paper over the crack. They did not address the bonfire in Ibadan or the incident in Ogun State when soldiers led herders to defy villages like Iggua and Eselu in Yewa North Local Government Area. Neither did they have the power to do anything other than rhetorical grandstanding.

    The place to address the matter is not Governors Forum. They have shown they can do little to ease tensions. They do not control the police. They have no power over the army. They can only cry. Governor Akeredolu’s order was a cry from his people’s marrow. The Ondo State governor was not the sort of chief executive to undermine Abuja. He was under pressure. He must have felt deeper worry when the presidency countered his order out of illiteracy. He did not order them out of the state as another newspaper headlined. The editor of that newspaper, in a professional moment, ought not to retain his job. It was the sort of headline that could set a nation on fire. Newspaper headlines have done so in the past. Like the Spanish-American War in the era of Yellow Journalism. Publisher William Randolph Hearst had said, “You furnish the pictures, I’ll provide the war.”

    The Governor’s Forum forgot a big, wailing elephant in the room: The presidency. Rather than play umpire, Garba Shehu was playing irredentist. He thought he was being a fair interpreter of the governor’s order. He turned out the man was stoking the flames up north. He was doing that on behalf of a president I am sure did not see the release. Or they did not explain to President Muhammadu Buhari the true import of Akeredolu’s words.

    As Barrister Femi Falana (SAN) noted in my television show it was an act of hypocrisy – my words – for anyone to berate Aketi’s order while we are witnessing droves of almajiri being evacuated from state to state in the north. No uproar came from Shehu that someone was violating the children’s rights. The ongoing NIN exercise is a security measure, but no one complained that it was wrong to register. Yet all the Ondo State governor asked for is to register.

    Up north, some fellows have exhibited the same spirit of eviction. Some of them are so-called professor, like one Isa Maishanu  and Abdul Azeez Suleiman. They are riding the wave of xenophobia. Bishop Kukah has said all he has said as a bold man should. But the tribesmen are bristling and drooling. They are baying for blood.

    Nnamdi Kanu must welcome the new firebrands. The Igbo warrior must hug the Igbohos and Suleimans. But they are the warlords of the day. They are not patriots of Nigeria. They are subverts and warriors in closets. They are men of hate. They are opportunists of fear. They are not Nigerian heroes but closet haters. But they are saints to the locals, arbiters of their impulses, channels of their grief. In the words of Poet W.B. Yeats, “He, too, has been changed in his turn/Transformed utterly/ A terrible beauty is born.”

    But they are filling a void. They are replacing a leadership that the centre has left a vacuum. There is an important work to be done. It beckons for a fair and firm control of the proceedings. Ibarapa area is still stark with rage and fear. After a week of silence, fresh attacks were reported. It shows we are on a thin rope between peace and violence, authority and anarchy.

    The Governor’s forum did not give any template of peace and cooperation. I advise them to seek one of their own who is executing a blueprint: the Lalong model. When Governor Simon Lalong became Plateau State’s chief executive, he set up a rubric for all the contending forces. It ensured each group accounted for its own role when peace was breached. It is imperfect, but the difference between his stewardship and what he met tells the story.

    The real danger is making anyone feel less at home when at home. We cannot be seen as a people without roots. As Hannah Arendt wrote in her tome, The Origins of Authoritarianism, “Rootless persons are always violent.”

    • For comments, send SMS to 08111813080

  • Herdsmen: We didn’t seek Sunday Igboho’s help, says Ogun

    Herdsmen: We didn’t seek Sunday Igboho’s help, says Ogun

    Ernest Nwokolo, Abeokuta

     

    Ogun State Government has denied insinuations it requested help from popular Yoruba rights activist, Chief Sunday Adeyemo, aka Sunday Igboho to tackle the menace of herdsmen killings.

    Igboho stormed Ogun on Monday afternoon, declaring war on killer herdsmen across the State.

    Yewa North and Yewa South in Ogun West Senatorial District have been the epicentres of herdsmen attacks, killings, maiming and wanton destruction of farmlands.

    The Nation had reported soldiers accompanied herdsmen to villages and communities in Ketu where they flogged indigenes for not allowing herdsmen graze on their farmland.

    Speaking with his supporters at the Ita Oshin junction, Igboho said he was heading to Yewaland to flush out criminal herdsmen.

    He said: “We observed there is injustice from the herdsmen because they are close to the FG. Any herdsman who engages in kidnapping should be flushed out.

    “Not only Igangan, we are going to visit all Yorubaland. I am going to Yewa because that is where the Fulani are wrecking havoc.

    “Let us thank the governor of the state. His love for people of Ogun State made him to allow us visit the state. If not for his love for the people of Ogun State, he would not have allowed us to come to the state.”

    But the Government said it didn’t invite Igboho to flush out herdsmen.

    Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Abdulwaheed Odusile, in a statement, said: “In the interview, Hon Hazzan had said that the state government, in its usual inclusive approach to governance, would continue to work with all the stakeholders, both within and outside the state, to ensure security of lives and properties.

    ‘’Sadly, however, this statement was disingenuously twisted to mean that the State had invited Adeyemo to help curb insecurity. This is regrettable and totally misleading.

    Read Also: The transition of Igboho

    “Prince Dapo Abiodun’s administration, since inception, has been known to be inclusive in its approach, always collaborating and engaging with a wide range of stakeholders.

    “Security is no exception, resulting in the achievement of the enviable status and recognition as most secure state in the country by many organisations.”

    He added: “For avoidance of doubt, Ogun State Government will continue to deploy all constitutionally sanctioned means to fight crimes and criminals in the state, including working with institutions that the constitution and other statutes have saddled with the responsibility of protection of lives and properties.

    “At all times, the Government will ensure that all security agencies and indeed all stakeholders operate within the ambit of the law and will neither welcome nor endorse any initiative that amounts to self-help or is outside the contemplation of the constitution, which is the ground norm binding on all governments and persons in the country.”

     

     

     

  • Ogun celebrates at 45

    Ogun celebrates at 45

    Ernest Nwokolo, Abeokuta

     

    Activities marking the 45th anniversary of the creation of Ogun State will begin on Wednesday, but on a low-key.

    The state was created on February 3, 1976 by the then Head of State, Gen.  Murtala Muhammed, who announced in a nationwide broadcast the creation of seven states to increase the number of states in Nigeria from 12 to 19.

    Ogun, one of three states created from the old Western State, comprising the six states in the present day Southwest, is a fusion of the old Abeokuta/Egbado and Ijebu/Remo divisions of the defunct Egba and Ijebu provinces.

    Read Also: FG disburses N70m to Ogun rural women

    A statement on Sunday by the Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Alhaji Abdulwaheed Odusile, said the year-long celebration will be low-key due to the precarious public health situation in the country, following the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and in line with the government-declared protocols on how to combat the dreaded disease.

    On Wednesday, there will be a state broadcast by Governor Dapo Abiodun. This will be followed by a virtual colloquium with the theme: “Ogun State: The Legacy of a Great Future”, the statement said.

    The lead paper at the event will be presented by a renowned scholar of public administration and retired federal permanent secretary, Prof. Tunji Olaopa.

    “Other programmes, including school competitions and the inauguration of landmark projects of the Governor Abiodun administration, will take place at different times in the year, especially as we move towards the second anniversary of this people-centred administration,” Odusile said.

     

     

  • Former PDP lawmaker, others defect to APC

    Former PDP lawmaker, others defect to APC

    Our Reporter

     

    A former member of the Enugu State House of Assembly, Mr. Obinna Okenwa, on Sunday defected to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Okenwa represented Enugu South Urban in the state assembly from 2015 to 2019 on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    He declared for the APC with over 500 of his supporters including his father, Chief Emma Okenwa, one-time deputy chairman of the PDP in the state.

    Read Also: Fresh rumble in S/West PDP over 2023

    The former legislator said that he decided to join the new party due to its progressive nature, adding that the PDP had lost touch with reality.

    He solicited the support of the APC to enable them contribute meaningfully to the success of the party in the state and beyond.

    “We are joining the APC with our supporters, family members and well- wishers with a promise to make a difference.”

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Donald Trump ‘parts with  lawyers’ before impeachment trial

    Donald Trump ‘parts with lawyers’ before impeachment trial

    Former United States (U.S.) President Donald Trump has parted ways with lawyers representing him in his impeachment trial in the Senate, U.S. media reports indicated yesterday.

    The departure of Butch Bowers and Deborah Barbier was reportedly a mutual decision, according to a BBC report.

    Trump’s trial for incitement to insurrection starts on February 8.

    Senators will be asked whether to convict him on a charge he incited insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, when five people died.

    Greg Harris and Johnny Gasser, two former federal prosecutors from South Carolina, have also left the team, the Associated Press reports. They were reportedly unwilling to defend Trump on the basis of alleged election fraud.

    Josh Howard, a North Carolina attorney, who was recently added to the team, has also left, CNN reports.

    It is now unclear who will represent Trump during the trial.

    “We have done much work, but have not made a final decision on our legal team, which will be made shortly,” tweeted Trump adviser Jason Miller in response to the reports.

    Read Also: Donald Trump: An American phenomenon

    Trump is the first president in history to be impeached twice. He was impeached by the House in 2019 over his dealings with Ukraine, but acquitted by the Senate.

    Now he is accused of inciting a mob that stormed Congress after he repeated false claims of election fraud.

    A total of 45 out of 50 Senate Republicans voted this week to consider stopping the trial before it even started on the grounds that presidents cannot face impeachment trials once they have left office.

    It would take 17 Republican senators breaking ranks and voting alongside the 50 Democrats to convict the president, potentially leading to his prevention from running for federal office ever again.

     

  • Glorious past

    Glorious past

    Editorial

     

    Right from its inception in 2015, the President Muhammadu Buhari administration has demonstrated its determination to diversify the economy and particularly break the unhealthy dependence on petroleum revenue by investing heavily in the agricultural sector. Thus, apart from strengthening pre-existing agricultural support schemes which it inherited, such as the Agricultural Credit Guarantee Scheme (ACGS) and the Commercial Agricultural Credit Scheme (CACS), it introduced new initiatives to enhance agricultural productivity as well as self-reliance.

    These include the Agricultural Small and Medium Enterprises Loan for SMEs and Agricultural Businesses without Collateral (AGSMEIS), the Anchor Borrowers Programme (ABP) intervention for Agriculture, the Accelerated Agricultural Development Scheme (AADS) Loan as well as the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Fund (MSMEDF). Most of these initiatives target strengthening small holder farming businesses, which constitute the mainstay of Nigeria’s agriculture, especially in the wake of the ravaging COVID-19 pandemic.

    Despite these massive interventions, however, the country remains substantially import-dependent for food and the agricultural sector continues to perform below par in terms of its revenue generating capacity to the national coffers. While this can be attributed significantly to the large scale violence in food producing areas of the country that has devastated and destabilised farms and communities, the Federal Government last week took a major step that, if diligently implemented, will address what is perhaps the weakest link in the sector and give a further boost to agricultural productivity in Nigeria.

    According to the Executive Secretary of the National Agricultural Land Development Authority (NALDA), Mr. Paul Ikonne, the government is set to engage 30,000 graduates to be deployed across the country as agricultural extension workers who will provide technical and strategic support to farmers. To be engaged under the National Young Farmers Scheme, these graduates “will be trained intensively for two weeks on soil sample collection and soil tests as well as other agricultural extension services”.

    Before the advent of petroleum relegated agriculture to the backwaters of the Nigerian economy, agricultural extension services constituted a key backbone of a hitherto vibrant sector. As the link between government, research institutes and farmers, agricultural extension officers helped to update farmers with latest techniques, methods and information to boost their efficiency, effectiveness and productivity. These extension services, particularly in the 1970s and early 1980s were, however, mostly funded by the World Bank through the Agricultural Development Programmes (ADPs).

    The revival of agricultural extension services as planned by government is surely the way to go to breathe new life into an ailing sector. But then, it is not enough for government simply to employ agricultural extension field workers. Efforts should also be made to address challenges that militated against the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in the past. Critical among these was poor funding leading to the unavailability of input materials necessary to support farmers, dearth of skills acquisition and demonstration centres as well as kits and low morale of extension workers.

    Experts have identified a wide gap in extension agent-to-farm ratio in Nigeria. It is thus important that government has an accurate data of farms and farmers in order to have a scientific basis for determining the number of extension agents required and how to deploy them. Again, will these agricultural agents be ad-hoc staff or will they be integrated into the federal and state civil services? This is an area where clarity is required. It is noteworthy and commendable that the government plans to subsidise the amount to be paid by farmers for the extension services such that only N500 will be required to be paid for any sample collected for soil testing.

    No less significant is the job generation potential of this initiative. This is especially as the Minister of Agriculture, Mr. Sabo Nanono, has revealed that 20 young Nigerian farmers have been empowered with a takeoff grant of N30 million sourced through the Bank of Agriculture as seed capital to establish small holder agribusineses.  All these initiatives will go a long way in boosting agriculture if faithfully implemented, if past mistakes are corrected and if the government is able to improve on the security situation.

  • Biden’s likely policy orientation toward Africa

    Biden’s likely policy orientation toward Africa

    By Ejeviome Eloho Otobo & Oseloka H. Obaze

     

    The inauguration of the Biden administration has generated much global interest. Its implications for Africa are highly anticipated. It helps, therefore, to examine United States’ current national context, the views of its leaders on Africa, and the recent history of Africa-United States relations. The Biden administration has come to power at one of the most fraught national moments in recent U.S. history.   The US has an exploding COVID-19 crisis accounting for about 20 per cent of global COVID deaths and 25 per cent of all COVID infections.  The resulting impact on unemployment and income inequality has been devastating.  The U.S. recently witnessed a mob attack on the Congress, one of the major pillars of its constitutional democracy. There is also the issue of racial injustice that the new administration must grapple with.

    This combination of domestic challenges could adversely impact US disposition toward to Africa, but will not constrain its commitment to reassert its global leadership role. Indeed, as a presidential candidate Biden made clear, in his article published in the March/April 2020 edition of Foreign Affairs, the U.S. “will rebuild confidence in our leadership, and mobilise our country and allies to rapidly meet new challenges.” Among those challenges, he listed strengthening democracy around the world, with particular focus on three priorities: fighting corruption; defending against authoritarianism; and advancing human rights. He also indicated that the US will “need to do more to integrate our friends in Latin America and Africa into the broader network of democracies and to seize opportunities for cooperation in those regions.” These concerns were echoed by Antony Blinken, Secretary of State-designate, and members of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee during Blinken’s recent confirmation hearings.  In addition, some members of the committee expressed deep concern about the backsliding on democracy in Uganda and Ethiopia and the deteriorating political situation in Cameroun.

    Lessons from history provide some useful guide on what African countries can expect from the Biden administration.  In the last quarter century, United States policy towards Africa has centred on three main policy areas: conflict management, including combating terrorism; economic assistance through a variety of instruments; and humanitarian medical support. To help combat terrorism in Africa, U.S. deployed military assets in the region, including in Somalia and a few Sahel countries wracked by terrorist violence.  Three important economic initiatives have stood out:  the enactment of Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) in 2000, which offered improved market access for African exports into USA; Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) aimed at helping countries that perform well on governance; and U.S. Power Initiative aimed at doubling electricity for Sub-Saharan Africa, supported by U.S. government and private sector contribution. The humanitarian medical initiatives consisted of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which many African countries were major beneficiaries, and United States dispatched a huge contingent of troops, policy experts and health officials to Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea to support these countries response efforts on Ebola disease.

    The past is often a prologue to the future.  Africa faces a combination of persisting challenges from the past and a daunting array of new problems. The consolidation of democracy in Africa identified by President Biden in his Foreign Affairs article is a prime example of a persisting challenge. The mob attack on the Congress will likely make a few political leaders in Africa to question the moral authority of the Biden administration to “lecture” Africa on the virtues of democracy.  They would be wrong because, as Biden said in his inaugural address, “democracy prevailed.”  The lesson from that experience should inform U.S. democracy initiatives in Africa to strengthen institutional resilience to better respond to challenges to democratic constitutional order, in addition to advancing the cause of the human rights of the citizens. But a United States policy towards Africa that focuses predominantly on democracy will elicit derision by segments of the elite and dissatisfaction by citizens who long for improvements in their livelihoods.

    Africa’s needs are varied and huge. Hence, U.S. support for Africa should transcend the promotion democracy, and include actions on a range of economic-related issues, in particular support for Africa Continental Free Trade Area; renewal of AGOA –which is set to expire in 2025; support for combating COVID in Africa, in particular through the COVAX arrangement that U.S. has now joined; and a strong commitment to supporting Africa in its economic transformation. The past few years have witnessed a bi-partisan concern on China’s growing influence in Africa. The Biden administration will be making a big mistake to perceive China’s role in Africa through the prism of malevolent intent akin to the former Soviet Union during the Cold War. China’s economic influence in Africa has grown largely because it has shown greater commitment than the U.S. in supporting the region’s economic transformation by assisting in building infrastructure; establishing model economic and industrial zones; and nurturing the relationship by the periodic convening of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). China has convened a meeting of FOCAC on triennial basis since 2000 and met at Heads of State level since 2006. By contrast, U.S. convened the first and only U.S.-Africa Leaders’ Summit in 2014.

    Not long ago, the fear was that the U.S. reduced aid to Africa and increased military footprint in Africa might translate to U.S. power in Africa being felt more in its military presence than in development support. Today, the likely combination of reduction in aid and draw down of military support to combating terrorism in Africa will lead to diminished U.S. overall assistance for security and development. Inevitably, U.S. will apply hard power and soft power as its strategic interests warrant. Yet there are many opportunities waiting for the United States to seize in its renewed cooperation with Africa.

     

    • Otobo is a Non-Resident Senior Expert at the Global Governance Institute, Brussels.

      Obaze is Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Selonnes Consult in Awka, Anambra State.

  • How feasible is PDP’s claim of returning to power?

    How feasible is PDP’s claim of returning to power?

    Losing out of power after 16 years at the helms, the opposition Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) believes it can stage a comeback during the next general elections by defeating the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). JIDE ORINTUNSIN looks at the claims and counter-claims by the two leading parties, as Nigerians eagerly wait for another general elections

     

    Although the next general elections is slated for February 2023, some two years away from now, but development in the political circle has shown that the opposition Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) has begun its preparations for the elections. It has bombarded the media space in the last months with the campaign of becoming the preferred political party for the next election.

    “Nigerians desire that the PDP return to power” had been the opening and closing tune at most gatherings of members of the party and in virtually all its press statements. The party chieftains will, at the slightest opportunity, tell whoever cares to listen that Nigerians are desirous of their return to power. With River State’s Governor Nyesom Wike and party spokesman Kola Ologbondiyan acting as the main agent provocateurs. No event of the party or statement from ‘Wadata House’ is complete without a rehashing of the refrain, ‘Nigerians desire our return to power’.

    The party has hinged its dream of returning to power on the insecurity and the economic challenges currently being faced by the country and have predicted doomsday ahead for the country that would necessitate Nigerians to seek refuge under the umbrella in 2023.

    On several occasions during inauguration of some of the projects executed by his administration, the Rivers State helmsman has told the ruling APC to prepare its handover notes at the federal level for the PDP in 2023. Wike boasted that Nigerians were earnestly waiting for the PDP to take over power in order to ensure good governance in the country. He said “the hope of this country depends on PDP” and that the party will kick the APC out of the centre come 2023.

    The party’s National Publicity Secretary has also been in the forefront of the campaign to portray the ruling party in a bad light. He has never hesitated to rubbish the handling of the economy, the fight against corruption and the worsening insecurity situation in the country by the APC-led administration at the centre. For the Kogi State-born politician, by 2023 Nigerians will reject the ruling party and send her out of the villa. He argued that Nigerians are tired of the APC and are anxiously waiting for the PDP to return to power.

    Part of Ologbondiyan’s allegations includes unfulfilled electoral promises, the increasing wave of insecurity across the country, looting of about N15 trillion from the national treasury, despite the war against corruption and the mismanagement of the economy. He said: “Having stripped our national coffers, the APC is now using its illegal caretaker committee to attempt to set the narrative of the empty treasury to validate their further looting of funds meant for the 2021 budget. By now, the APC ought to know that such narratives cannot fly when Nigerians are already aware that its leaders stashed away over N15 trillion stolen from our national coffers.”

    But, the governing APC has described the above criticisms as laughable. The party insists that the claim by the PDP that Nigerians are yearning for its return back to power is nothing but a mere illusion.

    The Secretary of the National Caretaker/Extra-Ordinary Convention Planning Committee (CECPC), Senator John Akpanudoedehe said the APC remains the party of choice for a majority of Nigerians. He counselled the PDP to spare Nigerians the trauma of a reminder of the disaster of its 16 years of misadventure in government.

    Read Also: PDP accuses Buhari of violating COVID-19 law

    APC has therefore cautioned the opposition not to overheat the polity and to desist from further inflammatory statements, so that Nigerians can forgive the numerous transgressions and agony of the years of misrule by the party.

    Akpanudoedehe said the ramblings of the PDP to regain power were nothing but a sound and fury. He added: “It is our belief that Nigerians should be spared the trauma of a reminder of the disaster of PDP’s 16 years of misadventure in government. It should allow Nigerians to forgive it for the numerous transgressions and agony it had put Nigerians through many years of misrule for which their national chairman has rightly and publicly apologised.

    “We would ordinarily have allowed the PDP to wallow in its usual illusion — since its descent from power in 2015 — that ‘Nigerians desire their return to power;’ how laughable! We are constrained to set the records straight because it borders on the collective sensibilities of Nigerians who have consistently and resoundingly proven in two consecutive cycles of general elections as well as other off-cycle elections, their outright rejection of the contraption called the PDP and restated their preference and endorsement of the APC as the party of choice for the majority of Nigerians.”

    The governing party maintained that there was no room for comparison between it and the opposition party. It insisted the opposition lacks the moral authority to compare the APC era with the wasteful years of PDP rule which had nothing to show for the huge receipts from the sale of crude oil for 16 years of its administration.

    “Where lies the moral authority of the PDP to even contemplate comparing themselves to the APC after its wasteful years in governance. But, instead of burying its heads in shame and allow sleeping dogs to lie, its rantings keep reminding us of the ignominious era where: crude oil was sold at an average of $100 per barrel for a consecutive period of four years, which gave an excess of at least $30 per barrel above the budget benchmark and MTEF, and raking in surplus revenues – a windfall, if you like – for the country. Yet, what did Nigeria and Nigerians have to show for that period? Nothing at all!”

    The APC scribe added: “The PDP has decided to play to the gallery in an attempt to play deniability and take away the gaze of Nigerians from the remarkable strides which the APC-led administration of President Muhammadu Buhari is carrying out amidst very trying circumstances. Nigerians are aware that due to the monumental sleaze and leakages of our collective patrimony actively supervised by the PDP, the current administration of President Buhari inherited an empty treasury, coupled with the global decline in oil prices since 2014, which significantly trimmed the well-laid-out plans of the APC.

    “This is elementary economics. When your expenditure outstrips the supply of goods in the economy, inflation will occur in the long run. Just as we were able to pull through, COVID-19 came calling with worldwide economic ramifications. Nigerians understand that this was beyond us. Be that as it may, President Buhari went to work immediately by putting in place building blocks for a virile and sustainable Nigeria; economically, agriculturally, in the ease of doing business initiatives, infrastructural renaissance, the power sector reforms, in anti-corruption, social investment programmes, and of course in building strong institutions that will outlive the present administration.”

    For Akpanudoedehe, a 10-point achievement of the APC since 2015, which he said have culminated in the country emerging as the largest economy in Africa and the 25th largest economy in the world as contained in the IMF Report 2020 has put a lie to the claims of the PDP.

    The achievements include: the Treasury Single Account (TSA), which has successfully curbed the excesses of government officials that are prone to graft; the alignment the budget cycle with the January to December budget window to allow for better delivery of benefits to Nigerians; and the ease of doing business initiatives as implemented by PEBEC has propelled Nigeria’s ranking (moving down 13th place) in the Ease of Doing Businesses Ranking as published by the World Bank Group in 2020.

    In simple terms, this means that Nigeria is the 131st attractive country for investment out of a survey of 190 countries as against 145th it was placed in 2018.

    Besides, the 326km Itakpe-Ajaokuta-Warri railway which has been abandoned for more than 30 years is now fully operational, with modern coaches. The 156.5km Lagos-Ibadan double track standard rail line is also in operation.

    In the power sector, the APC-led Federal Government is battling to reverse years of neglect. This is despite the billions of dollars wasted in the sector in the past. For instance, the 3050 MW Mambilla Power Project, conceptualised over 30 years ago, is now receiving concrete attention. Imagine if all these had been done in the years when excess revenues were at the disposal of the PDP.

    The Siemens Presidential Power Initiative of the Buhari administration seeks to ramp up the nation’s entire electricity value-chain (generation, transmission and distribution) and add about 25,000 MW of electricity to the national grid. This will be fundamental to the growth of the manufacturing sector.

    The metering solutions and the solar home systems are initiatives that are people-centred which seek off-grid solutions to our energy problems by providing power to the rural areas to trigger economic activities by stemming rural-urban migration. Similar interventions in some of popular markets, tertiary educational and medical facilities are fully functional while some are at advanced stages of completion.

    The social intervention programmes of the Buhari administration are massive and unprecedented. These include the 774,000 SPW programme of National Directorate of Employment (NDE), supervised by the Federal Ministry of Labour, which kicked off on January 5, 2021, the N-power scheme that has accommodated over 500,000 beneficiaries thus far and another one million beneficiaries about to be engaged, the Trader-moni, Market-moni, and the schools-feeding programme are all targeted at the poor.

    The various stimulus packages encapsulated in the Economic Sust-ainability Plans of the administration are designed to re-jig the economy which has been dulled by the consequences of the dreaded COVID-19 pandemic with its attendant bottoming out of oil prices and the concomitant loss of revenues for Nigeria. Yet, despite this force majeure, the administration does not owe salaries and is consistently bailing out states, so that no Nigerian is owed salary irrespective of political leanings.

    APC maintained that the result of mid-term concurrent legislative by-elections have further deflated the opposition ego and claim that it is the government in waiting. The ruling party boastfully claimed that, from Imo, Bauchi, Lagos, Plateau and other states where the recent concurrent legislative by-elections were conducted across the country, the massive electoral victories recorded by the APC is a solid display and pointer that the APC remains the only political party with a true national appeal and acceptance by Nigerians, across geo-political zones and sundry groupings.

    Akpanudoedehe said: “It is indeed a true demonstration that President Muhammadu Buhari and the APC government he leads remains massively popular with Nigerians, despite the warped narrative some opposition partisans try to sell.”

    Comrade Jonathan Vatsa, a former Commissioner for Information in Niger State and founding APC Publicity Secretary observed that the recent defection of leaders from various opposition parties in the last six months has further boosted the acceptability of the governing party in the country.

    He said: “By our political culture, a ruling party usually experience members defecting out of it, but here is APC attracting more members as we move ahead towards another election year. Late last year, the Chairman Southeast Governors’ Forum and Ebonyi State Governor Dave Umahi dumped the PDP. Some federal legislators from Rivers State also defected. We are receiving more members across the country daily. For me, PDP is only dreaming and it is in order to dream but the reality is that Nigerians are still for the APC.”

     

  • Poultry farmers bemoan high cost of maize

    Poultry farmers bemoan high cost of maize

    By Daniel Essiet

     

    The Chairman, Poultry Association of Nigeria (PAN), Akwa  Ibom  State, Mr Solomon Ekong  has said  the sector  is facing serious crisis aggravated  the distress of maize farmers, who are producing  enough for the industry.

    According to him,  the  poultry industry was in the grip of a severe crisis due to an unprecedented and unreasonable increase in the price of maize, which is the most crucial ingredient of poultry feed and accounts for more than 80 per cent of the cost of production of eggs and broilers.

    He urged the government to facilitate the poultry industry and support cultivation of  maize, being used raw material for the feed industry.

    He said the cost of production of chicken and eggs is higher and that they  sell poultry at much below the production cost as compared to the prevailing international prices.

    He said poultry farmers must also be involved in maize production, adding that this would  help to stabilise prices of staple foods.

    Read Also: ‘I sold 6,000 dead poultry meat for five years’

    In most parts of the country, production is undergoing normal seasonal declines.

    The recent shortfall in maize production in Nigeria has pushed policymakers to search for viable alternatives. Most of the grains produced locally are consumed in various commercial sectors. About 50 p per cent of the maize produced is used as animal feed, with the poultry industry claiming the bulk of the country’s total feed production.

    Last year,  the  Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) granted import waivers to four agro-processing firms to import 262,000 tonnes of maize to bridge the shortfall in production and augment local production.

    Before the importation, the Federal Government through President Muhammadu Buhari had approved the release of 30,000 tonnes of maize from the National Strategic Grain Reserve to support the PAN at a subsidised rate.

    The volume of maize imported by the four firms was over half of the yearly maize imports of 400,000 tonnes.

    The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has estimated that Nigeria’s maize production for last year would be about 11.1 million tonnes, saying that importers were expected to import 400,000 tonnes to plug the production shortfall.