Author: The Nation

  • 25 journalists  for Access Bank Marathon

    25 journalists for Access Bank Marathon

    In line with Covid-19 protocols and working with the Lagos State Safety Commission and relevant agencies, organisers have announced that only 25 journalists will be allowed to cover the 2021 edition of the Access Bank Lagos City Marathon race and Press Conference.

    Olukayode Thomas, Head Communications and Media for the Access Bank Lagos City Marathon. explained that the decision is in strict compliance with laid down rules by the Federal and State ministries of health and other relevant agencies.

    Thomas said the usual applications for media accreditation will not be entertained this year but a rigorous selection process will be adopted to select 25 media platforms to cover this year’s race as well as the press conference.

    “There will be no accreditation process for journalists this year, we would only be selecting 25 media platforms with a pedigree in athletics and road races reporting to cover this sixth edition” Thomas explained
    Now in its sixth edition, the Access Bank Lagos City Marathon, the biggest one-day event in Africa usually attracts over 100,000 runners but the number has been reduced to just 300 runners for the 2021 edition slated for April 10.

    “As we already know, the number of runners was trimmed down from almost 100,000 to just 300 elite runners, this is the reality we find ourselves in, so we appeal to everyone to bear with us at this time” he added.
    Thomas revealed that the accredited journalists must also adhere to the protocols of COVID-19 by wearing their face masks at all times and also observe the mandatory social distancing.

    “We won’t even be entertaining interviews at the finishing line, all audio-visuals and pictures will be disseminated via all our platforms so our people can use them appropriately,” he assured.

  • NFF thanks  stakeholders, partners on Eagles

    NFF thanks stakeholders, partners on Eagles

    The Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has expressed appreciation to the Federal Government as well as the governments of Akwa Ibom, Edo and Lagos States for their immense contributions towards the Super Eagles’ qualification for next year’s Africa Cup of Nations finals in Cameroon.

    Success in the qualifying race will see the three –time champions make their 19th appearance in the biggest football tournament on the African continent.

    For the third consecutive major tournament, the Super Eagles qualified ahead of the final day of hostilities, this time with two matches to spare, doing better than even the one-match-to-spare accomplishments ahead of the 2018 FIFA World Cup finals and the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations. Captain Ahmed Musa and team mates dropped only four points from a possible 18 (draws at home and away to Sierra Leone) and never looked in danger of failing to reach Africa’s flagship tournament.

    NFF President Amaju Melvin Pinnick, said: “Our heartfelt appreciation goes to the Federal Government, right from His Excellency President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR. Without the total support and encouragement of the government, it would not have been possible. Our appreciation also goes to all agencies of government who have been of help along the way.

    “We are also very appreciative of the Chief of Staff to Mr. President. He has continued to be a pillar of support. The Presidential Task Force on COVID-19 and the Nigeria Council for Disease Control provided huge assistance and guidance in a difficult period for the whole world; certainly, things would have been impossible without their understanding and co-operation.

    “The Governments of Akwa Ibom, Delta, Edo and Lagos States played the role of good hosts to the Super Eagles before and during the campaign and were very magnanimous to the players and officials. The NFF is very, very grateful to them because without them, the task would have been close to insurmountable.”

  • 2021 AFCON: Five-star Osimhen listed  joint-top scorer

    2021 AFCON: Five-star Osimhen listed joint-top scorer

    By Olalekan Okusan

    Victor Osimhen has finished as joint top scorer of the 2021 AFCON qualifiers with five goals, same as Zambia’s Patson Daka.

    It will be recalled that Odion Ighalo also finished top scorer of the 2019 AFCON qualifiers with eight goals.

    He will also go on to finish top scorer of the tournament proper in Egypt with five goals.

    Alex Iwobi scored three goals, while Paul Onuachu and Samuel Chukwueze netted two goals apiece.

    A total of 334 goals were scored in 150 matches sans the postponed tie between Sierra Leone and Republic of Benin in the qualifying tournament for the AFCON to be staged in Cameroon in January.

    Meanwhile, Napoli-based media Tuttosport has hailed Osimhen’s contribution to the Eagles win in Lagos which also fetched him the Man of the Match award with N2m prize.

    “The bomber Osimhen is expected today in Castelvolturno , finally at the best of his condition after the three months spent between doctors and the playing field.

    “Victor was the protagonist in Nigeria’s victory against Lesotho (3-0), a valid match for qualifying for the next African Cup, with a goal scored in the first half, as well as an assist for Etebo.

    “Great performance by Victor Osimhen in Nigeria-Lesotho, qualifying match for the next African Cup won 3-0 by the hosts. Osimhen is unleashed again and for Gattuso it represents the best news, lifeblood for the 22-year-old who could start on Sunday , with Mertens ready to take over,” wrote the newspaper.

    Meanwhile, Osimhen has expressed his satisfaction with support from the Lagos fans during the tie against Lesotho.

    The Napoli striker wrote on his Instagram handle: “Been (sic) able to play in front of my whole family and friends in a city that I LOVE so much is something I will cherish for the rest of life. Thank you NIGERIA big shout out to all LAGOSIANS (EKO o NI BAJE).”

  • The Onnoghen challenge

    The Onnoghen challenge

    By Lawal Ogienagbon

    In the dead of night sometime early in October 2016, hundreds of security operatives stormed the homes of some judges in Abuja, Port Harcourt, Gombe, Kano, Enugu and Sokoto. It was something that had never happened before in the nation’s history. Raid a judge’s home? It was unheard of, and incredibly not only a home, but homes were raided. The operation came with much ado, with the security people going about it in their usual gragra manner.

    The raid, it later emerged, was informed by the need to expose the judges, who are believed to be corrupt. Among them were two Justices of the Supreme Court (JSC), Sylvester Ngwuta, who died last month, with just three weeks left then to his retirement, and John Okoro. As a nation that loves such drama, the public lapped up the story. Immediately, people started calling for their lordships’ heads. How can such corrupt people sit in judgement over us? Many wondered. In short, the judges were convicted before they were tried.

    Two other homes raided in Abuja that night belonged to Justices Adeniyi Ademola, as he then was, and Nnamdi Dimgba of the Federal High Court. The homes of Justices Kabiru Auta, Muazu Pindiga and Samia as well as Chief Judge A.G.Umezulike, as he then was, were raided in Kano, Gombe, Sokoto and Enugu. In Port Harcourt, the operatives could not access the home of Justice Mohammed Liman because Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike came to his aide. Whether the raids achieved anything we can never say. What the people heard was that some incriminating pieces of evidence were recovered from the judges. These were to form the basis of their trial from which nothing has so far come out.

    Unbeknownst was that the raid was the forerunner of the treatment to be given to former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen. With the 2019 elections around the corner then, the rumour mill was abuzz with his meeting with the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, in Dubai. Atiku faced President Muhammadu Buhari in that election. The implication of such meeting, if true, was not lost on the people. They wondered why the CJ would meet with a candidate in an election that may end up in the Supreme Court. Surely, if it is true, he does not deserve to remain in his exalted office a minute longer. Even, the media swallowed the story hook, line and sinker.

    In discussions in newsrooms, it was a hot topic, but there was no proof. It seems there is still no proof of the allegation, as Onnoghen has come out, at last, to deny ever meeting with Atiku in Dubai or anywhere else one-on-one. Where then did the tale emanate from? Although, the government never said anything about Dubai when it suspended Onnoghen from office in January 2019, the name of that tiny, but rich country in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) was never far from the surface whenever the issue was discussed. What the people were told was that Onnoghen did not declare his assets in line with the Code of Conduct for public officers before he assumed office.

    The issue was raised in 2019, two years after he became CJ in 2017. Should issues like this not be raised before public officers take office? Should they be sworn in when they have not declared their assets? Who should be blamed for that lapse? Is it possible that Onnoghen became CJ without being screened? If he was given security clearance before assuming office, does that not amount to a clean bill? Questions, questions and questions. The answers should not be hard to come by, if the government is ready to take up the Onnoghen challenge. By coming out in public to speak on the rumour which many believed led to his exit from office, Onnoghen is drawing the government out to tell the world its own side of the story.

    Onnoghen has given his own account, which many, who have become tired with the Buhari Presidency, may tend to believe.  They cannot be  blamed if they toe that line. Onnoghen laid his cards face up on the table, holding nothing back as he spoke, at a book launch in Abuja, on what could have amounted to his darkest hour in office. He spoke as a pained man and that is understandable. Who will be treated in that manner and not feel aggrieved? “Prior to my suspension,  I was confronted with no allegation. There were rumours that I met with Atiku in Dubai.  As I am talking here today (March 19), I have never met Atiku one-on-one in my life…”, Onnoghen said.

    Hinting that his exit was politically motivated,  he said: “Let me make it clear that the office of the CJN was not for Onnoghen but for all Nigerians who have sworn to guide and protect the Constitution of the Federal Republic…judicial officers must be courageous. I want to beg all judicial officers not to be discouraged by what happened to me in the hands of the executive arm of government. Emerging brand of Nigerian judges should not go the direction of injustice because without courageous judges, Nigeria is doomed. Democracy will be dead”.

    Onnoghen was tried and convicted by the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) in 2019, but the case was full of intrigues, raising doubts about its fairness. He gave vent to this at the book launch. He said he was not surprised when all of a sudden his trial at the CCT was arranged even when he had not been invited to defend the allegation (of non-declaration of asset) or any wrongdoing. If this can happen to the CJN,  who then can be sure of justice? Onnoghen has taken his case to the court of public opinion. Will the executive which he has pointedly accused of doing him in, despite “not committing any offence” take up the gauntlet?

    It is even surprising that the executive, which is quick to react to anything under the sun, has not deemed it fit to respond to Onnoghen’s weighty allegation, which he made 13 days ago. He did not stop there. He left the nation with a message: “if the judiciary is not freed from political manipulation, the dispensation of justice in accordance with the rule of law would be a mirage”. This, unfortunately, has been unfolding in our eyes and in an administration that prides itself on integrity for that matter.

  • Iyaye credits Wike for Rivers’ sports development

    Iyaye credits Wike for Rivers’ sports development

    Rivers State Commissioner for Sports, Barrister Boma Iyaye, said sports development, promotion and organisation stand to benefit more following the numerous road and land reclamation projects being executed by Governor Nyesom Wike.

    Speaking at a briefing in Port Harcourt with sports journalists on Team Rivers’ preparation for the forthcoming National Sports Festival in Edo, Iyaye noted that with the projects spread across the local government areas, the state is in a position to seamlessly host national and international sports competitions.

    He noted that with the plethora of solid road networks within the state capital and beyond, Rivers State was in a position to host local and international marathon races and cycling competitions, in addition to beach soccer and volleyball at reclaimed lands.

    The Commissioner emphasised that one of the parameters of awarding hosting rights to cities are good road networks, which ease movement of officials and participating sports men and women.

    Iyaye added that to further deepened his love for sports development and economic growth, the governor built a world-class football academy; the Real Madrid Football Academy.

    He said: “We must commend Governor Nyesom Wike for his vision and sense of responsibility. His broad approach to developmental issues has also triggered opportunities in the sports sector.

    “We can now host national and international marathons because we have solid road networks that include no fewer than eight flyovers, just as cycling can also take place in our state. “

    He added: “The governor is reclaiming lands in many riverine communities and these can also serve as breeding grounds for talents in beach soccer, volleyball and other beach-related sports.

    “We are proud of our governor, who understands that there is a nexus between provision of infrastructural facilities, sports development, harnessing of talents and wealth creation.

    “We all know that when you engage the youth, they have no time for social vices and when they are productive, they earn means of livelihood and become useful members of the society.

    “On our part as a Ministry, we are ready to collaborate with local and foreign sponsors who want to organise sporting activities in the state in line with the NEW VISION. Our doors are open for partnerships and collaborations in developing sports in the state,” he stated.

  • Fire ravages farmlands in Ekiti communities

    Fire ravages farmlands in Ekiti communities

    In Ekiti State, the rate at which farmlands go up in flames is alarming, making farmers and experts call for action, writes BUNMI ADULOJU

    All his life, 85-year-old Nicholas Komolafe, an indigene of Oya quarters, Omuo-Ekiti, Ekiti East Local Government Area of Ekiti State, has been a farmer. Sitting under the shade that this tree provides outside his home, he engages Lawrence Ekunode, his peer, in a conversation. A closer look at him revealed that he is strikingly aged.  With a shaky yet steady voice, he recounted, “I inherited my farmland from my forefathers and that is my only farmland. The farm is my only source of income to cater for my wife and children. My survival now depends on God. I will appreciate any help that the government renders to us.” Komolafe’s farmland was among the about 1000 hectares of farmland gutted by fire on the 19th of February, 2021 at the Oya Quarters of Omuo-Ekiti, Ekiti State.

    Like Pa Komolafe, about 2400 farmers have not recovered from the shock of the wildfire that destroyed their farmlands in the State. These farmers bemoan the wrath of fire as it spreads its tentacles. According to the State Environmental Management Agency (SEMA), about 1000 hectares of farmland has been burnt to the ground in Isinbode, Idogbe, Oya, Ijero-omu, Iludofin, and Iworo quarters in Omuo-Ekiti. Cash crops destroyed include cocoa, banana, oil palm and coffee. When some farmers at Oya Quarters were asked how long it takes for Cocoa to grow, they all laughed at the reality of the question. “It will take about 10years,” they chorused.

    This incident is only a fraction in the larger equation of farm fires in the state.

     

    More farmlands burn

    At the time of filing this report, there had been four confirmed cases of farm fire in three Local Government Areas in the State, according to the State Environmental Management Agency (SEMA). Officials of the agency had done four damage assessments at Iloro Ekiti and Ikoro Ekiti in Ijero Local Government area, Ekiti State, Omuo-Ekiti, Ekiti East Local Government and Omu Ekiti, Oye Local Government Area, Ekiti State. However, the agency had received news of other cases in five other Local Government Areas in the State. The cause of the fire had not been ascertained by the agency.

    In 2020, the annual fire disaster report collated by the State Environmental Management Agency (SEMA) shows that fire ravaged farmlands twice in 2020 on the10th February, 2020 at Eemo Community, Efon Alaaye, Efon Local Government and 3rd December, 2020 at Oke Aso (Formerly Igbo-Aso) Ado Local Government in Ekiti State.

    In 2021, there has been a quantum leap in the number of farm fires in the State. This could be as a result of increased activities of uncontrolled bush burning or indiscriminate hunting activities. Mr Olusegun Afolayan, head of operations at the  National Environmental Management Agency (NEMA),  blames the farmers for most of the farmland fire incidents. “When you tell them to take certain precautions, they won’t do it. The government is making some efforts to make sure that fire disasters don’t happen. We envisaged it and it is happening now,” he blurted.

    Abigail Akomolafe, a 76-year old mother of ten children, shared her ordeal with weariness. She is also an indigene of Oya Quarters, Omuo-Ekiti. Vividly recounting the ordeal at her destroyed farmland, she failed to smile at the jokes her relatives threw at her to provide succor to her pain. Instead, she passionately narrated her woes. She said, “When I got to my farmland, I fell to the ground weeping profusely. For three days, I had a fever. In fact, as I speak to you, I am downcast.” She is a typical example of a hard working African woman. She spoke of how she goes to her farm before the dawn of the day only to return at dusk. “I used the proceeds from the farm to educate my children. I don’t have any other occupation apart from farming. Temporarily, I can’t work”, she complained. When asked what the possible cause of the fire was, she said, “Only God knows what caused the fire. It could be the activities of cigarette smokers, it could be hunters who put bushes to fire in order to hunt.”

    “I used to eat three-square meals before the incident happened and I used to give my little children 200 naira each as pocket money to school but now I can’t do so. I told my children in the university that I would send money to them when I sell the batch of plantain that got burnt in the farm fire. I can’t send the money to them again and I have a child who is in the final year”, Modupe Omodara narrated. The middle aged business woman is a wholesale distributor of bananas to Abuja. According to her, she used to earn at least 25 thousand naira on each trip that a truck makes to Abuja. Now, she has no hope on her business.

    Olu Omotosho, a Professor and Head of Department, Geography and Planning Science, Ekiti State University, Ekiti State, noted that the prevalence of this type of fire disaster is common during the dry season which occurs from the month of December to March. He stated the possible causes of wildfire in the State.

    “Majority of the people are farmers and this is the time they prepare for the next farming season. It is possible that the farmers burned certain areas which might escalate and it might not be easily put under control. This is the time hunting activities are common. In an attempt to get bush meat or bush animals, some of the land might be set on fire and it might not be controlled,” he said. His opinion corroborates that of Mrs. Kemisola Laka, Director, Relief and Disaster, SEMA.  She said, “The major cause of farm fire is bush burning. Other causes are smoking and hunting and they are subsidiaries.”

    Olalekan Olowoyo, an environmental economist and the executive director, Green Global Environmental Network, explained the myth surrounding soil fertility amongst local farmers. He explained, “The reason why people set bushes on fire is a result of the traditional way of farming. The farmers believe that there will be more productivity as a result of the potassium from the ashes and that it enhances the productivity of that land. But unknowingly, when you set a place in your farm on fire and you burn it, though there will be production of potassium and some other elements that are useful but invariably you have destroyed the ecosystem.”

    He further explained  alternative means which farmers can deploy on their farmland. “The farmers can slash and then allow it to decay. When you allow it to decay, the decaying of that debris will have added to the organic content of that soil and then, there will be a resurfacing of other microorganisms that can enhance productivity. Another option is using machineries, tractors or any other machines you want to use just to incorporate the debris into the soil. There are a lot of other means that they can use instead of burning the bush,” he opined. With a note of finality, he noted, “We are discouraging the act, it is not good to set bushes on fire.”

     

    A call to action

    A victim of the Oke Ayo, Omuo-Ekiti farm fire disaster, Mr Peter Ayodele, appealed to the government to sensitise the locals to mitigate future occurrences of farm fire. He said, “The government is supposed to appeal to our people that during the dry season, farmers should not go to the farm with fire lighters like matches and other fire instigators. The hunters should be very careful.”

    Mr Olalekan Olowoyo noted that the government should discourage bush burning. “One of the things I believe the government is doing but not to an expected level is constant awareness. Though, there are regulations but the regulations are not being monitored or implemented. If you burn bush, there should be a penalty but how many people have been prosecuted for bush burning? The government should educate the farmers on the consequence of bush burning. It needs monitored regulation,”

    Prof. Olu Omotosho discouraged the practice of bush burning practiced by farmers and hunters. He urged environmentalists to take up the responsibility of sensitising the farmers. He said, “We can discourage farmers from bush burning by advising that after a portion of land is cleared, it should be allowed to decay. It will naturally decay if they could exercise a little patience instead of setting that portion of land on fire and wait till it decays. It will even serve as manure to the land and fertilize the soil. Hunting activities, especially hunting for bush meat, should be discouraged.”

     

    The bigger picture of climate change

    A random inquiry into the activities of farmers revealed that there is a high level of bush burning by farmers. In fact, this reporter was greeted by sites of bushes that are either burning or have been burnt.

    Prof. Olu Omotosho revealed that these activities have an underlying effect on the climate. “The smoke released to the atmosphere automatically will affect the ozone layer within the stratosphere. The ozone layer is what is absorbing the ultraviolet rays. The ultraviolet rays are just like cups but as a result of human activities, especially smoke being released to the atmosphere, leaking occurs and that is why the environment is becoming hotter”, he explained.

    “What contributes to the issue of climate change is as a result of our emission. Bush burning can also cause climate change as a result of carbon monoxide and other ozone gases that are released. During bush burning, there are a lot of gases that we don’t know that we burn. We are not controlling these gases. We are saying we can holistically control these emissions. If you set a bush on fire, you are causing a huge impact on climate change,” Olalekan Olowoyo also explained. He explained further that the changing climate condition is as a result of climate change. Similarly, Mr Olusegun Afolayan, NEMA Head of Operations, Ekiti State commenting on the adverse effects of bush burning, said, “An adverse effect of climate change is abnormal rainfall. By March, the dry season will fade away and by April, it will be signaling the rainy season. Windstorms precede rain and this causes a lot of damage.”

     

    SDG Goal 13:  Climate action

    There are 17 Sustainable Development Goals designed to improve the living conditions of humans and promote the peaceful co-existence between the planet and man. Indiscriminate bush burning violates the SDG Goal 13.1, which aims to “strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries.”

  • X-raying ‘Ilera Eko’

    X-raying ‘Ilera Eko’

    The ‘Ilera Eko’ health insurance scheme introduced by the Lagos State government promises to cater for the health needs of everybody, writes OYEBOLA OWOLABI

    Lagos residents can now rest assured that their hopes of getting expert and adequate medical attention will be met. This is because the government’s newly introduced ‘Ilera Eko’ health insurance scheme is a promise that no one will be left behind.

    The scheme comprises the individual and family bouquets. With N8,500 annually, anyone can subscribe to the individual package while the family package goes for N40,000.

    Though the health scheme was officially launched at the LTV Blueroof in Agidingbi, Ikeja, Lagos, people are already benefitting from it, and they have beautiful testimonies to give.

    Victor Oluranti Odebode, 72-year-old cleric, is a subscriber to the individual bouquet. He underwent a major surgery he could not have sponsored out of his pocket. He, however, didn’t have to bother about money because his premium was able to cover payment for the procedure.

    He said: “I was introduced to the scheme by a staff of the Lagos State Health Management Agency (LASHMA) three years ago. I didn’t listen to him at first because I found it difficult to produce the N8,500 that was required. But when I could afford it, I gave him the money and he registered me.

    “I chose the hospital of my own interest and since going for the procedure, I have been taking treatment, getting consultations and medications. I felt alright. I have also continued by renewing my bouquet.

    “Only those living can serve the Lord. I urge people to take advantage of this insurance scheme to benefit themselves and their family. Our body daily deteriorates, all the functions weaken, but when we have supplements, it keeps us moving.

    “However, I urge the agency to increase benefits in the package to about 90 per cent for the vulnerable and senior citizens.”

    Adeniyi Oyeyemi subscribed to the family bouquet and is grateful for the opportunity.

    “This scheme is very helpful. I started using the scheme in March 2020. I was sceptical and reluctant at first because most people believe that anything coming from the government is inferior. But when I saw the benefits in the package, and hospitals on their list, I believed it was not a child’s play and joined. I also liked the fact that I get to choose the hospital of my liking, and one of the best hospitals in my area is on the list.

    “Since I started using this scheme, I have not regretted it. It has been helpful. I renewed my policy on March 16 so I can continue to enjoy the package.”

    According to the Commissioner for Health, Prof. Akin Abayomi, the scheme was launched to give the poorest of the poor access to basic healthcare.

    “Everyone deserves to live a healthy life. No one should be left behind in the move for better healthcare.

    ”We are very particular in Lagos as we have the financial model that can provide health for those living close to the poverty line so we don’t push people to the point where sickness can cripple their livelihood and affect their opportunities to generate economic well-being here.

    “The health scheme is designed to provide a good spectrum of healthcare delivery services to all Lagosians, but particularly to protect the vulnerable. A lot of people spend out of pocket during illnesses, which can drive the family deeper into poverty. As a result of this, the government has provided the equity fund which is one per cent of our consolidated revenue. This money would provide health and support a health safety net to people who are unable to afford the premium.

    “It has been designed to be as low as possible, and it provides a significant number of services to Lagosians, such as birth control, maintenance of high blood pressure, diabetes, vaccination, and general ailments that affect most people.”

    About 40,000 persons currently enjoy the insurance scheme free, but Abayomi said the number is still low, and so the government has come up with other avenues to ensure people are not left behind.

    He said: “We are providing up to 40,000 Lagosians with a free health insurance scheme at the moment, but this is not enough. We have a long way to go because, according to the bureau of statistics, up to 40 per cent of Lagosians will struggle to pay the premium even as low as it is. So we are reassuring Lagosians that the government is not oblivious to the fact many cannot afford the insurance now, and we are making provisions, both from the budget and several other ways, to raise funds for them.

    “One of such ways is the – Ilera Eko Crowd Funding – where we are looking to those who are better off to support those who need help. The Lagos State Health Management Agency (LASHMA) is trying to encourage Lagosians to be each other’s keepers. If you are well off enough, you can provide funding for people in the community who cannot afford the premium and insurance.

    “Another way is for people to pay in instalments – daily, weekly or monthly – until it adds up for the year.

    “This is providing health through insurance, but the other side of the coin is to ensure our facilities are well equipped, filled with skilled resourceful workers, has drugs, electricity, and has comfortable treatment spaces. So while we are promoting health insurance on one side, we are also ensuring that service providers in the scheme, whether public or private, meet standards that are comparable to anywhere in the world,” Abayomi said.

    The wife of the governor, Dr. Ibijoke Sanwo-Olu, described the health campaign as symbolic of the Greater Lagos journey. She urged the people to sign up for the scheme, saying it is in the collective interest of the state, and the wellbeing of the people, for all to join the train.

    According to her, the insurance scheme aptly signifies the administration’s commitment to promoting human rights to health and a resilient healthcare network.

    She said: “The scheme, which is administered by LASHMA, is to ensure Lagosians have access to the needed healthcare without suffering financial hardship; close the gap between the demand for health spending and available public resources and reduce the prolonged reliance on out-of-pocket spending

    “The evolution of this scheme identifies with the global clarion call to inclusive health make-up, termed Universal Health Coverage. This was conceptualised to close glaring coverage gaps and meet the health targets agreed under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

    “As we embark on this path to Universal Health Coverage, Ilera Eko is passionately calling us to take responsibility for our health. We are determined to leave no one behind.

    “All residents, regardless of socio-economic and ethnoreligious identity, including the vulnerable, are encouraged to make the right choices by signing up for this scheme because our lives, livelihoods and futures depend on it.”

    Packages in the scheme are individual (N8,500 for one year) and family (N40,000 for one year). Subscribers would have to renew yearly.

    Services covered under the scheme include outpatient care for common ailments and conditions; maternal, new-born and child care, including the caesarean section where necessary; access to family planning counselling and services; management of uncomplicated chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, asthma, among others; access to HIV and TB testing services; minor surgeries such as incision drainage, herniorrhaphy, appendectomy; and health promotion and diseases prevention.

     

  • Wike the humorist

    Wike the humorist

    Hardball

    Governor Nyesom Wike is a natural humorist, the sort that amuses in his state of nature. He has been in a state of humour of late. We are all witnesses to his humorous dance of late, or shall we call it gubernatorial kinetics. Those who follow online performances, especially of the VIP types, wouldn’t have missed it.

    It was first a solo act before it morphed into dual whirligig, a sort of duet with another past master of natural humour, former Imo State governor Rochas Okorocha. But what became even more interesting was Wike’s public foray into Pidgin English. He sat with a BBC pidgin host to discuss politics in a grassroots language, and he was rather good at it.

    But what concerns Hardball here is not that he was partisan. No man can be more partisan and even astute at it than Wike, with his scratchy voice. He said he would not support his master, Goodluck Jonathan, if the Otuoke man pivots to APC for his try for a second coming as president. He said it with defiance, and it was clear he was in another mood, if not humour.

    This time he wanted to bite the fingers that fed him. He did that in a broadside at Jonathan. So, he could not spare his familiar foe, his predecessor and transportation minister Rotimi Amaechi. The interviewer did not even mention Amaechi’s reference to the fact that Wike was a member of his staff before Wike broached the subject. Wike practically denied he was a member of the former governor’s staff, even if his position was the only one that carried the appellation of “staff.” He was chief of staff. Maybe he imagined that being “chief” of staff made him above the staff. He did not explain that.

    Before then, he was the director general of Amaechi’s campaign to be governor of Rivers State. Ironically, the man who became chief of staff said he chose that position over any other. He implied that he could not be a member of his staff because he chose to be chief of staff. Laugh!

    He practically competed with God in asserting who made Amaechi governor. He wondered how he could be a member of his staff if he made him governor. Wike became governor once, and then he is serving his fruits of his second victory in his second term. He needs to learn a little humility. He has a chief of staff today. Tomorrow, when Wike will be somewhere in his village in political retirement or limbo, will his present chief of staff say he was not a member of Wike’s staff?

    Wike may be governor today, but before then one Amaechi occupied that chair, and Amaechi was the boss. That is what the hierarchy says. That is what the law commands. That is what history echoes. He cannot deny what was true. The governor signs orders, including the salaries that all members of his staff, including their chief, earn. Wike was at the mercy of Amaechi, who even set the stage for his national spotlight by making him minister and handing him over to the other master, Jonathan, who he banded with to fight his first master, Amaechi. Governor Wike, with all his bluster, can learn a little gubernatorial modesty.

  • Minimum Wage/NLAC and Ngige

    Minimum Wage/NLAC and Ngige

    By Issa Aremu

    Having related with dozens of ministers of labour during my eventful 35 years in the labour movement, I bear witness that Senator Chris Ngige, stands out for his statesmanship in upholding the cherished core values of tripartism, decent work, defense of workers’ rights that Nigeria signed into as a long-standing member of International Labour Organization (ILO).

    ILO membership is a national heritage. Nigeria has been an ILO member since 1960, on attaining independence.  The country has also commendably ratified 40 international labour conventions compared to United States which has ratified only 14 of 189 despite being member of the executive of the ILO governing body. ILO Convention 28, the Minimum Wage Fixing Machinery Convention of 1928 (No.26) and the Minimum Wage Fixing Convention of 1970 (No131) are notable conventions with Nigeria’s signature. The conventions provided international biding framework for the first national minimum wage in 1981 as demanded for by NLC’s Charter of Demands initiated by the founding leadership of NLC led by Hassan Sunmonu. Since 1981, there had been significant four reviews of national minimum wage: 1990 (N250 per month), 2000 (N5,500 per month, N7,500 for federal employees, N6000 for Delta and Rivers states), 2011 (N18,000) and 2018 (N30,000) – thanks to organized labour’s demand and struggles led by the NLC!

    While many enlightened employers in private and public sectors uphold minimum wage in principle, regrettably the notable gain of Nigeria’s working class has come under varying attacks in recent times by few governors who often claim inability to pay the negotiated rate. Ironically, minimum wage negotiation process is inclusive of governors. I recall that at the height of the negotiation for the latest minimum wage in 2018, Abdulaziz Yari, then chairman of the Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF), reportedly said that governors “are not against the upward review of the minimum wage but they only lack capacity to pay it”.

    The received wisdom had it that if there is the will, there would always be some ways. Many governors like Yari, feigning inability to pay minimum wage paradoxically exhibited enormous will to seek “ways” and “means” to finance and refinance serial televised primary and indirect political party primaries with some delegates paid in sundry currencies (and certainly more than national minimum wage!).

    Governors’ forum under Yari had scandalously proposed N20,000.

    Former President Goodluck Jonathan also demonstrated uncommon statesmanship and resisted the pressures of Nigerian Governors Forum under Rotimi Amaechi not to sign N18,000 Minimum Wage Act of 2011. However, the most unhelpful, uninformed and most dangerous controversial attack on the principle of national minimum wage lies in the recent private member’s bill sponsored by Hon. Garba Datti Mohammed representing Sabon Gari Federal Constituency in Kaduna State. The bill seeks to move minimum wage from Exclusive List to Concurrent Legislative List of the 1999 constitution. Some governors have even inexplicably and ingeniously argued that the bill was part of a “national restructuring”, the new buzz word by the political class to escape from the challenge of good governance.

    The controversial bill had passed second reading at the House of Representatives before thousands of members of Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) marched into the National Assembly to protest against move by lawmakers to remove minimum wage matters from the exclusive to the concurrent legislative list. Should the bill become law, the federal government will not have exclusive jurisdiction to determine a national minimum wage and states will now have the power to determine their own minimum wages, preferably downwards. It is to the eternal credit of Minister Chris Ngige that he rose in defense of the principle of minimum wage which is also enshrined in 1999 constitution.  At the inaugural meeting of the newly-constituted National Labour Advisory Council (NLAC) in Owerri, Imo State capital, the minister reiterated the government’s position in defence of minimum wage on exclusive list. He said it was based on the need to comply with the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention 144 to which Nigeria is a signatory. With this singular intervention, Ngige would be credited with the best labour practice legacies, just like some labour ministers who had commendably defended workers’ rights despite political pressures.

    I recall that Dr Emmanuel Udogu was the labour minister under General Abubakar Abdulsalam as the military head of state following the death of the maximum military dictator, Sani Abacha. Despite political pressures by some anti-labour forces in the Abubakar military junta to retain obnoxious decrees promoted by his predecessor, Minister Uba Ahmed, Dr Udogu commendably upheld the sanctity of ILO conventions and progressive labour laws Nigeria had signed into. His predecessor, Uba Ahmed, had enthusiastically promoted obnoxious Decree No. 4 of 1996 which chose to ‘reinvent’ the country’s trade unions by providing legal backing for the restructuring of the hitherto 41 into 29 industrial unions as well as redefining union membership through exclusion of so called “non-card-carrying members”.

    Uba Ahmed also promoted the notorious decrees 9, 1 0 and 24 which dissolved the executive councils of the NLC, NUPENG, PENGASSAN, ASUU and NASU (almost in that order). Dr Udogu as labour minister engaged with organized labour to repeal these obnoxious laws and to restore trade union independence in line with ILO conventions. The point cannot be overstated that Minimum Wage on Exclusive list is a settled national question. since the second republic with the enactment of the inaugural Minimum Wage Act in 1981, only the federal government through the ministries labour and finance and National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), has the data to engage organized labour and private sector before arriving at the national minimum to ensure decent, not slave work and productivity. Twenty-one years after uninterrupted democratic process, it is unacceptable that some legislators lack sufficient knowledge of 1999 constitution which puts critical factors of development like labour, capital and land on the exclusive list with a view of promoting a planned and balanced economic development of Nigeria. All federations of the world maintain minimum labour, health, safety pension, welfare and financial standards failing which sustainable and harmonious development is impossible.

    The key to sustainable development is labour productivity in both public and private sectors which is only possible with motivated paid workers at work and after work through adequate pensions. Nigeria must remain committed to decent work agenda which include payment of a living wage to all categories of workers in the public and private sectors, as an investment in human capital is an investment nation-building. This is why the inauguration of the newly-constituted National Labour Advisory Council (NLAC) is timely. It offers another opportunity to revive tripartism and social dialogue on critical labour issues at times like particularly with the Covid-19 pandemic and its attendant economic recession.

    The rationale for new minimum wage is simple: The ILO Convention 131 and Recommendation No. 135 1970 ratified by Nigeria prescribes that that national minimum wage fixing should constitute one element in a national policy designed to overcome poverty and to ensure the satisfactions of the needs of workers and their families; and that the fundamental purpose of national minimum wage fixing should be to give the earner necessary special protection as regards minimum permissible levels of wage. Many employers have the liberty to pay more as we have seen in year 2000 when federal government, many private sector employers and some states paid beyond the legally permissible national minimum.

    • Aremu mni is a veteran labour activist.
  • Price of intolerance (II)

    Price of intolerance (II)

    By Mohammed Adamu

    Without prejudice to the unfortunate anticlimax of that ill-fated year-2000 youth-reprisal against the New Salem Church of The Lord in Limawa, the history of inter-faith tolerance in my Muslim-majority Minna of the 70s did not actually start or end with the welcoming of a lone church in the midst of a thousand minarets. In fact, even as far back as then, our conservative parents were still known to possess a more delicately-sensitive species of inter-faith forbearance than just accommodating a rival place of worship -because they had also allowed us to attend Christian missionary schools where, because initially we were mostly a minority, we had attended morning assemblies reciting ‘The Lord’s Prayer’.

    And if memory serves right, I had always returned home from my Saint Michael Primary School (later Waziri Primary School) cheerfully singing ‘Our Father Who Art in Heaven…’ and my obviously unperturbed mother had merely always said to me: “whenever you are done with that missionary gibberish you know where to find your food!” Meaning that even at those formative ages, our faithfully tolerant parents had always trusted that they had formidably instructed us enough to keep the faith and that, as the Bible would say, although we might ‘walk through the valley of the shadow of death’, they were sure not to fear that their children might fall or that in fact we too might fear that we might fall!

    In fact by the time I was in class two or thereabout and a sizeable number of Muslim pupils had now been achieved, the missionaries had no hesitation gladly allowing a separate assembly for the Muslims, so that in fact even as the Muslim population thereafter swiftly grew (with their acquisition by government), to outstrip the Christian population, there was no need for a face-saving realignment; everything just went seamlessly without any rancor. Who could have been prescient enough to predict that in some 30 years thereafter, this tolerance quotient would be so low that even a harmless, inoffensive piece of female Muslim ‘head-covering’ could be so intolerably apple-of-discord enough to threaten the peace and security of the whole nation.

    My westerly-illiterate father had once told us how when he was a young boy eking a living in the Kaduna of the 50s, he had no qualms working for Christian missionaries, because, he said, having been lactated on the milk of Islamic faith, he could always brave the biblically parabolic ‘walk through the valley of the shadow of death’ and fear no fall. This had made us more formidably tolerant even of delicate Christianizing situations such as daily reciting the Christian Lord’s Prayer. And it was the reason that when I was to buy my first property in Minna, I had cared less that the house I was about to buy and raise my children in, was at the densely Christian-populated Tunga area of the town, or that in fact not only did it share a fence with an ’Aladura’ Church it was also opposite a Seventh Day Adventist Igbo one.

    How about that for inter-faith tolerance-readiness? And yes, although we should not vainly put out our faith to test, but whenever we have to face the test of faith, we must do so with a mojo of spiritual courage and not the fainthearted trepidation of men of ‘little faith’. It took faith without fear, for the westerly-literate Muslim son of that conservatively tolerant father who had lived adjacent a noisome Church in the 70s, to surpass the faith quotient of his parents by getting ready to live beside and opposite two even noisier ones. Talk about having to bear and raise your children into non-stop daily drumming, singing, clapping, dancing and speaking in tongues, and with the certitude that on Thanksgiving days they may do like you once did, sneak into one for a bowl of rice and Fanta.

    And so it inspires neither interfaith tolerance nor spiritual valor that we should still have, in this age of plural living, some Christian parents with so ‘little faith’ that they should fretfully start their kids off on the intolerant and timid notion that the fabric of Christian faith that they are made of cannot bear the harmless gaze of a simple Islamic head-covering without the fear of losing their spiritual vigour. Or even the ridiculous innuendo that the Muslim kids who wear the ‘hijab’ are themselves a manifestation of the antichrist himself. This, rather than prepare them for that occasionally inevitable walk of faith through the ‘valley of the shadow of death’, instead rips the David out of them and with it, all hope that Goliath may someday be overcome.

    And it is without the least intention to bruise the spiritual pride or ego of some of our Christian brothers that I am constrained to say that, you cannot make a show of trusting in the protection of the ‘blood of Jesus’ and in the scotching vengeance of the ‘Holy Ghost Fire’ but then when the chips are down to walk the talk of faith, you are unable to bear to be eyeball-to-eyeball even with the most innocuous of ‘antichristic’ symbols of Islamic code of decent dressing, namely the ‘hijab’. So much in fact that now the irony of it is that it is us Muslims who appear often to take the daredevil ‘leap of faith’ that most Christians nowadays seem only to pay hypocritical lip-service to, about the parabolic walk in the ‘valley of the shadow of death’, because they are animated always by a needless fear of the imminence of a fall.

    Postscript

    Interfaith tolerance was the reason also, that when I was looking for late admission into any of the four private universities around the FCT for my daughter and a sister-in-law, I had practically no qualms checking out including obviously Church-run Veritas and Bingham universities in Bwari and Karu respectively. Yet both universities had still presented me with the most unbearable case scenario of interfaith INTOLERANCE anywhere around an educational institution in a plural society. And it was not that they would not admit Muslim candidates, or that they would not allow the wearing of ‘hijab’. Far from these. Rather it was the policy that as part of the continuous assessment of students, they are required weekly, at Veritas, to participate in a VC-conducted Christian Mass and, at Bingham, to belong to and ‘actively’ participate in the activities of a chapel.

    The best way of knowing the obnoxious import of this interfaith kind of INTOLERANCE is to imagine that any one of Abuja’s Turkish (Nile), or Kwara’s ‘Al-Hikma’ or Katsina’s ‘Al-Qalam’ universities requiring that as part of the institutions’ continuous assessment, every student –irrespective of whether they are Muslims or Christians, must record a certain percentage of ‘active’ daily mosque attendance where the records must show that they are actively involved in the saying of the five daily Salat. No private university in Nigeria –not even if it is Ka’aba-run- which admission is open to all irrespective of their faiths, dares to impose such intolerantly exclusive policy and does not risk being touted especially by CAN and the media as enthroning a policy of islamization in a citadel of learning.

    I have asked and I am assured that none of these Arabic-name-bearing universities of Turkish (Nile), ‘Al-Hikma’ or ‘Al-Qalam’ make such outrageous demand even of their Muslim candidates, let alone their Christian ones. And the irony of it was that when I finally found ‘Baze University’, the only private one around Abuja owned and run by a Nigerian Muslim family, I would find the environment there virtually more secularly pluralistic in policy than even any of the most notoriously laissez-faire public universities you would know. And since most Christians I have argued the hijab issue with have always demonstrated a queer –even if amoral- sense of the secular, I should give them the ‘good news’ that the skimpiest skirt I ever saw worn by any university undergraduate, was by a Christian girl I saw at ‘Baze University’. Needless to say that it is inconceivable that such a liberal institution will demand salat willy-nilly even by Muslim students, let alone Christian ones. In fact, it is virtually certain that Christian students, no matter how few they will be here, will be free even to run their Churches and chapels without any hindrance.

    • Concluded.